You are on page 1of 12

MSE Soft soil Embankment

Structure Location
wall depth heigth

North
Guapo River No 10 8
South

Southern Main
East and west Yes 8 10
Road Overpass

Mosquito Creek Southern bridge No 6 to 14 5

Black Water Culvert B36 Yes 8 4

Penal Penal IC
Yes 8 11
Interchange underpass

West abutment
Hermitage
Overpass Yes 1 11
Cancelled
East abutment

Soomai

Tulsa Trace
- Yes 10
Overpass
Suchit Trace
Overpass Yes 6 10
Cancelled
Suchit Trace
Overpass New Yes 6 10
Location

North abutment
Mon Dsir I/C
Yes 8 12
Bridge
South abutment

Fyzabad I/C
Underpass
Excavation Yes 2 -
Bridge, stand
by
Siparia I/C
Bridge, stand - 7.6
by
Total
Traffic
loading
Embankment Embankment Unit loading in Total
from
length width weight designer's loading
designer's
report
report

60 60 19 10 162 148

40 40 19 10 200 185

40 12.5 19 68 163 104.525

48 48 19.5 90 168 269

40 40 19 10 219 ?

40 12 19 10 219 209

40 12 19 10 200 190

40 12 19 10 200 190
40 12 19 10 200 190

40 40 19 10 238 ?

- - - - - -

75 75 19 10 154.4
Designer's Ground improvement
Estimated
CPTU estimated
settlement
settlement recommended by the desig

10
IE - B 057 12 No
8

1E-B-27+980-CPT 14 No

8,52 (East) and


1E-B-28+015-CPT 18 11,5 (West)
Yes

1E-B-28+035-CPT 24

P1 - C26 7
P2 - C4 8
P2 - C10 60
98.5 Yes No
P2 - C7 93.6
P2- C8 70
P2 - C 5B 114.9
P2 - C9 90.6

C034 244 1027 No No

1B - B 036 123 ? Yes Yes

39 63

Hermitage overpass Yes Yes

39 119

No CPT available Yes No

Suchit trace road 45 Yes Yes


Suchit trace road 45 Yes Yes

2C - B 049 15 Yes No

2C - B 048b 200 Yes No

1C - B069 0 1.37 No No

CPTU available but


we do not have the No No
data
d improvement Designer's remarks and
ded by the designer recommendations

No treatment because only silts and sands->


immediate settlement, excavation and backfill 3 m

No No

No treatment because only silts and sands->


immediate settlement, excavation and backfill 3 m

No No Wickdrains spaced of 1.2m

Preloading surcharge of 1,5m and wick drains (spacing


Yes No of 1,2 or 2m)

Preloading surcharge, wick drains, stone columns and


No No lightweightfill (no further details)

Over-excavation and replacement of 2m of compacted


Yes No granular soil below MSE wall and wick drains spaced of
1m from each other

No No

No No
No No

No No
Wickdrains spaced of 2m and/or surcharge 1,5-3 or 5m
high
No No

No significant settlement expected since the project is


No No to excavate to build a bridge under an existing road

No Yes Surcharge of 1,5m


Terratek's recommendation

Agreed Stone columns or Geopier, both abutments

Use geosynthetic reinforced


Stone columns or Geopier (impact pier), both
temporary wall, if there is no
abutments
ground treatment

Time contraint leads to


Geopier (Impact Pier), DSM or
stone columns. Need take
into account how much
settlements occurred

Time constraint: Geopier


(Impact Pier), 10 m deep ,
DSM or stone columns.

No time constraint:
wickdrains, 1.4 m spacing,
temporary surcharge 2 m. If
schedule is tight: DSM or
stone column

Wickdrains + 1 m temp
surcharge

Tight time schedule: stone


columns, DSM

No CPT's then final


recommendations waits for

cancelled
wait for site investigation

No time constraint:
wickdrains, 1.4 m spacing,
temporary surcharge 3 m
hight, polyester geogrid
reinforcement minimum 400
kN/m on either direction

No
Additional
Terratek's workflow status
CPTU's

Yes at the North


Yes Report issued on 13 November 2014
abutment

Yes Report issued on 13 November 2014

No No Report issued on 17 November 2014

Additional CPTU
Report issued on 19 November 2014,
Yes received and
rev 2 issued on 8 January 2015
analysed

Yes, a couple
Yes report issued on 26 January 2015
more

No cancelled

Yes CPT's received, on-going analyses

Yes No CPT's yet

Yes cancelled
Yes Issued on 23 January 2015

Yes Issued on 17 November 2014

No Stand-by

Stand-by