The Full Motion is coming by 2 May 2017.
The Western District Court allowed Defendant Rumbaugh's attorneys to lie with impunity as it failed to analyse Judicial Immunity under the proper Qualified Immunity analysis: Defendant Rumbaugh is not acting in a true Judicial Capacity or adjudicating the rights of any litigant or their representative when deciding where a video reporter should sit or how he or she should operate a goddamn camera.
It's really pretty simple but the Establishment is going to make it as complicated as can be, because they absolutely HATE cameras in the Courtrooms exposing all of their goddamn fucking DIRT.
When I practiced in Federal Court I always wondered why cameras were verboten there, and now I see why State Defendants run off to Federal Court on these types of cases as soon as they can, as they pray for a sympathetic Judge. Well they got one in Judge Ricardo Martinez but last year I won the exact same argument on Remand before Judge James Robart.
Original Title
King et al. v. Stanley Rumbaugh 2:17-CV-0031 Declaration and Rule 59 Motion on Bogus Dismissal of Free Press GR 16 lawsuit.
The Full Motion is coming by 2 May 2017.
The Western District Court allowed Defendant Rumbaugh's attorneys to lie with impunity as it failed to analyse Judicial Immunity under the proper …