Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rejoined.
Nietzsche close to Plato and Socrates. Myth and tragedy together. Nussbaum says is
not tragedy.
Woodruff is dealing with the relationship between Nietzsche and Plato by analyzing
their respective mixture of philosophy and tragedy in their writings. Woodruff
combats the traditional view of Plato as a hyper-rational and ultra-logical by
demonstrating that his dialogues are full of metaphors and myths and the creation
of tragic-comic philosophical dramas in which Socrates plays the role of hero. For
Nietzsche, Plato always remained an enigmatic and ambivalent figure; Woodruff
points out important similarities such as their acknowledgment of the limits of
philosophical reason and the need for tragic art. Woodruff supports this claim by
citing relevant excerpts from Plato in which Socrates realizes the need for art in his
life and how Nietzsche as well needed to recur to a multifarious literary style to
transfer his messages such as Thus Spoke Zarathustra, which combines both tragic
and comic elements. Woodruff engages with critics who have worked on this issue:
she shares the view with Nehamas of the inextricable link between Plato and
Nietzsches works; she disagrees with Nussbaum who thinks that the Socratic death
scene is not tragic theater. [background to my project.]
provides Nietzsches
the sublime as the artistic taming of the horrible, and the comic as the discharge of
the nausea of absurdity.
Both Plato and Nietzsche have a tragic sensibility, as I have tried to show: both are
acutely aware of the limitations of the human mind and the need for tragic art at
the limits of reason.
Comedy.
Notebooks
Nehamas, Socrates