You are on page 1of 414

January 1 2009

Irrefutable evidence the RCMP refuses to Investigate Government Organized Crime

BLACK BOOK II (2)

The RCMP Connection Part 2


Compiled RCMP Correspondence November 8 2007 up to September 3 2008
Continued from BLACK BOOK II (1)… The RCMP Connection Part 1

This is correspondence with the RCMP commencing November 8 2007 up to September 3 2008

I had filed November 8 2007 with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP for refusing
to investigate Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and on September 10 2008 I
received the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 signed by RCMP Superintendent
Robert Davis, District Commander Greater Toronto Area that has irrefutably proven the upper echelon of
the RCMP are major players in the Government Organized Crime.

Amongst the evidence provided to the RCMP is the original BLACK BOOK dated September 1 2006
BLACK BOOK II (1) “The RMP Connection Part 1” a compilation of the evidence provided to the
RCMP from January 3 2006 – November 8 2007 and this document BLACK BOOK II (2) “The
RCMP Connection Part 2” a compilation of the evidence provided to the RCMP from November 8 2007 to
September 3 2008 the signing of the document that will go down in history as the

THE CRAP THAT BROKE THE GAVELS WHACK

Compiled RCMP Correspondence November 8 2007 up to September 3 2008

This is copyright © material … See www.URus.ca for restrictions … For Personal Use Only

1
2
3
Memo

Friday December 21, 2007

Bob MacAdam of the RCMP Newmarket called around 2 PM and talked for about 15 minutes.

He has been on the case for 3 weeks but clarified not all the time as he has lots of other cases.
I mentioned that I was expecting the RCMP Commissioner’s 30 day status report which was due around
December 16 2007 but he didn’t know anything about that.

Bob said he is not investigating the conspiracy just the complaint.


“What’s to investigate?” I asked, “Did you talk to Sgt Steinebach…
He’s going to tell you I brought documents down to him about 7” thick evidencing government corruption
and conspiracy and he refused to take the documents and refused to investigate.”

“I had been e-mailing Michael Thomson the evidence but he wouldn’t respond.
Then I noticed on the RCMP web site that they wouldn’t accept documents by e-mail so I printed out the
files and took them down to the RCMP at Newmarket and eventually Sgt Steinebach met with me.”

After talking for about ½ an hour I asked the Sgt. if he knew me and he said yes, that the e-mail documents
I had been sending have been put into a file but they wouldn’t be investigating.

Just before my mother and I left I asked clearly and specifically if he was going to take the documents and
he said no he had them all on file but they won’t be investigating.

That’s my complaint. The RCMP won’t investigate and if he asks Sgt. Steinebach he will tell him the same
thing.
So what’s to investigate about the complaint?

He asked if I could drop down maybe next Friday to discuss the matter which I agreed to at first until I
asked if he had checked the evidence on the web site when he said no.
I asked why not? The instructions clearly stated the evidence was on the web site.

I want the government investigated and the evidence is irrefutable of the government conspiracy.
He mentioned again he was not investing the conspiracy just the complaint.

I told him to investigate the complaint he would have to study the evidence to see if it was a valid
complaint.
Is it trivia, frivolous or vexatious?

There is no need for me to drive down to Newmarket and he said okay but he may call me back.

4
Mad Glad mostly Sad…..WHY?
Start at page 44 if you have read this in BLACK BOOK II (1)
which we recommend you read first and before that the
November 12 2007 original BLACK BOOK 9/01/06

We can not go higher until we Lower the Bar


By Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
June 30 2005 In the Beginning 34 Riverglen Drive
Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal Hearing Keswick, On.
375 D’arcy Street Newmarket Ontario L4P 2P8
Re: TNL-67103 franklyone@hotmail.c

(1) Don Wilson, my former tenant and president, director of BioSafe Natural Technologies Inc. a
company that I had invested in committed fraud over $100,000 and filed false and misleading information
with the ORHT over $43,000 in front of the judicator Nancy Fahlgren who doesn’t give a damn in a
building financed by the people to administer Justice under the Constitution Act, 1982.
WHY?
Evidence
E-mail to Toronto Sun Editor dated October 8 2006 (73 page document)
-commentary and compiled evidence that was provided at the hearing and to Dave Grech- coordinator
Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
-disk copy of recording of hearing for first day June 30 2005 (Start at 3:21:00 +/-)
.Note: The second and final day of the hearing July 28 2005 was not recorded. WHY?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_
(2) September 6 2005
Dave Grech coordinator Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing refuses to commence or cause to commence charges against Don Wilson. WHY?
It took near a month to get Dave Grech to write to explain why he refused to commence proceedings
against Don Wilson and when he finally did his reasons were absurd and incoherent to the evidence.
WHY?
Evidence
- Dave Grech compiled correspondence Sept. 1 2007.doc
- Lawyer File # 2 March 30 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__
(3) September 30 2005
Rick Hennessey Regional Manager OHRT refuses to commence proceedings against Don Wilson stating
the case was closed and wouldn’t be keeping my request on file.
WHY?
-Tampered with evidence- removed part of recording WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 1 March 30 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__
(4) September 26 2006
Hon. John Gerretsen Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing refuses to review Dave Grech’s decision
not to commence proceedings against Don Wilson because he trusts Dave Grech and refuses to investigate

5
the ORHT because they are independent of the government.
WHY?
The Minister’s duty was to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and the ORHT
operates under the ACT.
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 3 March 30 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__

(5) June 9 2006


Ombudsman decline to help for ridiculous reasons. WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 4 March 30 2007

(6) August 16 2006


Julia Munro MPP My representative refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 5 March 30 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__
(7) August 14 2006
Premier Dalton McGuinty Suggests Hon. John Gerretsen but refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 6 March 30 2007

(8) 2006
Michael Bryant Attorney General Ontario Refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 7 March 30 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__
(9) November 14 2006
Det. Sgt. Randy Craig OPP-Anti-Rackets Refused evidence- Biased WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 8 March 30 2007

(10) January 10 2006


Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge York Regional Police Refused to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 9 March 30 2007

(11) November 15 2006


Sheldon Prior Ontario Commission on Police Services Refused to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 10 March 30 2007
6
(12) March 30 2006
General Details the crimes committed - reference to government conspiracy
Evidence

- Lawyer File # 11 March 30 2007

(13) April 1 2007


General The world according to me- an appeal for sanity
Evidence

- Lawyer File # 12 March 30 2007


_____________________________________________________________________________________
__

(14) April 5 2007


Robert McLeary Crown Attorney, Newmarket, On Refuse to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 13 April 5 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__
(15) April 5 2007
Paul Culver Crown Attorney, Toronto, On Refuse to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 13A April 5 2007

(16) April 7 2007


Sgt. Michael Thomson Royal Canadian Mounted Police Refuse to help Why?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 14 April 7 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__

All of the above government personnel have received a copy of the 15 Lawyer Files
as have the government personnel whose e-mail addresses are listed on the last page

They as well as the list of government personnel on the last page have been provided my web site
addresses requesting each person deal with the issues referenced therein in accordance to and
consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982 conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Canadian
Charter Rights and Freedoms

This is pathetically absurd in itself as this is their responsibility but as I detail the story attached to
this it will be humongously clear they do not understand the concept and simply are not competent
to the task .

Contained within these writings is a preponderance of evidence which they voluntarily provided to
me

7
presuming I was under the spell cast by the Office of the Minister of Justice and the Attorney
General of Canada

This spell cast by the Office of the Attorney General of Canada is intended to lull the populace into a
passive state of tranquil trust whilst the government personnel fleece them bare to the astronomical
benefit of the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who have been assigned all the top spots in
the illegitimate legal system of Canada operating in absolute contrast to the Constitution Act, 1982

The success is dependent on their ability to have us believe they are of the spirit of God and administer
and enforce the Constitution (document) as demanded consistent and conducive to it while in fact they
are of the spirit of the Devil and administer and enforce a modus operandi conducive to the benefit of
their members which has created a two tier system as a result to the extravagant benefit of the immoral
minority to the most pathetic detriment to the moral majority.

The irrefutable proof is available on my web sites which has been collected over a period of more than
two years where it all began on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal as a relatively
simple personal matter to evict a former tenant in arrears of $10,000 which evolved to a story of
historical proportions that will change life on earth forever.
The Fiction of the Attorney General of Canada
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force/web/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force/web/law-society-of-lower-tier
This is just one of more than 33,000,000 true stories of the fiction of the Attorney General and every
person in Canada knows at least one of the stories of fiction because they are living it.

Reality is not at all what it seems yet is precisely how it is to each persons unique perception which is a
piece of heaven or hell or some where in between with no way out other than to comprehend any and every
which way they can to break the spell cast upon us by the powers that be who have used their evil against
us as has been the eternal struggle of humankind to control the evil that is inherent to us all.

This story must be told but more importantly must be read, understood and related to all Canadians for the
well being of the moral majority and the well deserved punishment to the immoral minority as gravity
pulls them down to earth to meet us as we rise in financial bliss worthy of our efforts as we seek out
unobstructed, our unique perception of Heaven on Earth

WARNING
It is of the utmost importance that you are aware that once you have read this book your life will
change forever and you will not be able to go back from whence you came for upon recognition of
the fiction it vanishes along with the perceptions of reality you existed and new fiction will be at your
immediate grasp to convert to the reality of your desires which is to the ultimate Ideal of the moral
majority of Canadians who will never look back as they forge ahead to their well deserved piece of
Heaven.

The power in this book is dependent on the power of the mind to comprehend the difference between
what is real due to the fiction lived and what is fiction due the reality lived which is somewhat of a
befuddlement but the more attentive you are to the realism of sanity the sooner you will settle into
my shoes as you gradually ease as one with my mind experiencing emotions bordering on
hopelessness and despair, frustrations and then conviction to the resolve as we retrace the reality of

8
the insanity of more than two years that dispelled the fiction which had obstructed the desired
reality once unachievable manifested uncontested due the befuddlement.

Perhaps now you are more befuddled, but fear not that is precisely where you need be to be with me
for this now relatively quick journey back in time to the promise of a prosperous future equal to
precisely that which you have earned and deserve according to The Law in the spirit of God.

It’s all fundamental and elementary my dear ….even if you are not Watson

It’s the simplest thing you will have ever done yet dwarfed by the simplicity of what’s yet to come in
the new world where

Fiction is Realized by All in Good Faith

Two and Half Years Back …Twelve Hours Forward Far Past Now

Unfortunately the trek is decidedly mundane inciting genocide so it is imperative you have full grasp of
your senses tentative to conviction with fortitude to retain alert consciousness whilst all around one by one
are passing out from attentiveness to monotony necessary combined with the excitement of the promising
eventuality ETA 12 hours with no turbulence expected however wanting due the prerequisite tedium

Well let’s give it a try and if you need a break it’s most reasonable and more so due to circumstance and
remember I have done it a gazillion times already with the promise of as many to come but I take great
solace in the knowing that those who endeavor the trek will go on to blaze the trails ahead for me to follow
when my work is done here.

Perhaps I will come upon someone who comprehends the necessity of my endeavor and will relieve me to
go on to other trails worthy to venture for the well being of the worthy.

It would be prudent to mention some will get it within the hour and some will think they got it but whether
that moment arises 1 hour or forty days it matters not until you take the initiative to make it real by
registering your faith and conviction as a member of our Society which affirms the reality.

You can rush on ahead and perhaps miss some of the necessary ingredients to dispel the fiction but you can
not walk too slow down this trail nor partake of too many diversions for I am there with you every moment
as I was so many times before and should we be parted, will rendezvous at the source of our power in
cyber space with the power of God, our spirits as one communicating in spirit as spirits until we meet face
to face in the world of God’s creation which is ours who are of the spirit of The Law which recognizes the
supremacy of God.

For the benefit of those who don’t get it, we do it for their benefit as well as our own and for those who do
get it most likely have it and to them I say prepare to share it.

9
I don’t hesitate to give the ending away to save you the seemingly long innocuous superfluity of mundane
necessity if your intelligence exceeds the necessity and point will be well made and received when you
become a member of our society whose initiative is to dispel the fiction by simply revealing it, turning the
princesses and princes, kings and queens of the Law Society of Upper Canada into the can of worms they
are and ultimately created, where feeding them to the birds, which most assuredly will be accepted by all
as they take their rightful place “for the birds” as is their ideology.

Do I hear an amen?

For those of you who are excited to the concept but see no need to take the full trek I remind you the cost
is the same either way, or any which way, Free as long as you sign up at the finish line.

Failure to do so will assuredly cost you as you support the status quo, continuity of the Fiction of their
leader which you remain loyal to as the answer to those charlatans’ prayers.

Forgive us for not forgiving you for you drag us with you due to you and others akin who don’t have the
sense or conscience to consider the realities certain as the fiction collapses unwillingly by the immoral
minority as we are incited to immorality for moral purpose once again, with many predictable unhappy
returns before the concept of true democracy under the supremacy of God takes for real.

I wish you all good luck with your conscience and direct you to the shortcut
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force/web/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
For those of you requiring a little evidence to support a conviction, obviously not under the influence of
the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada, I direct you to my web site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force/web/law-society-of-lower-tier
where more than ample evidence is to be found where if you can believe in lies and fiction you will feel
the power truth can bring.

For those caught up in the fiction and seek help from the above, come with me and fill your heads with
truth Then surely you will be nearest to the help you seek as you control your mind in and with the spirit of
The Law which is assuredly the spirit of God which in itself declared supreme.

Who would dare suggest God is Fiction once we can believe in The Law to be administered and enforced
consistent with and conducive to the spirit of God demanded.

Who is to demand it if not us, we the people of Canada?

United here in the Law Society of Lower Tier Canada in faith there is nobody above us but our spirits
united as one in the spirit of God in the Upper Tier where He is heads above us all.

Remember we can not go higher until we Lower the Bar


________________________________________________________________
_
Under Construction - No Hard Hats allowed
A little knock on the head would help
________________________________________________________________

10
Perhaps while I am readying for the 12 hour trek you might want to slip
over to the office http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force/web/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-
of-rights-and-freedoms and have a look around, where this will be found

Maybe you would like to take a kick at the Bar

Go ahead, it’s FREE

Just click on Do your part.doc and then simply do your part

Damn, almost wet my pants

Yes, Johnny…It is that easy. Now go tell mommy and daddy and every
stranger you meet.

Proof of the Government Conspiracy Against the Moral Majority

Pages 1-3 briefly outlines my encounters with government departments and agencies where their personnel
demonstrate a consistency of incompetence to administer and enforce the supreme law of Canada, the
Constitution Act, 1982 consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms.
On these first three pages I have listed encounters (1) – (16) which beg the question WHY? as to the way
they carry out business in the so called Legal System of Canada under the authority of the Constitution and
the following pages relate my initiatives as I set out determined to get the answers the government
personnel would not answer FFF, Forthright, Forthwith, Forthcoming
Their consistency to not be FFF and to avoid addressing the issues caused me to do some research which
led me to the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario Attorney
General’s web site which opened many more questions WHY?
Due to other circumstances beyond my control as Reality will have it I had reason to correspond with the
Law Society of Upper Canada on a completely separate personal matter which left me with more questions
WHY? and when you put all the WHY’s together there is a consistency which answers themselves.

The government personnel who did respond provided the evidence to consistently support that which the
questions WHY’s answered themselves.

That is to say the Constitution (document) which includes Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms which guarantees every individual equality in protection and benefits before and under the law
demands a Constitution (establishment) capable of backing the guarantees to every individual which is
fundamental to the endeavor.
Ultimately the government personnel must be irreproachable to purpose, competent, responsible and
accountable to the Canadian people who finance the whole system from top to bottom, buildings, parking
lots, vehicles, maintenance, utilities, office furniture, supplies, uniforms, equipment, human resources,
their excellent benefits, pensions, medical coverage, vacation pay, and extra holidays.

11
Reality itself is the best provider of the evidence which is commonly known and that is the people pay an
exorbitant amount of taxes to the government to structure the system and the departments are in place with
everything they need to accomplish the task and the following are excerpts from the Constitution
(document) which the Constitution (establishment) must be able to demonstrate due diligence to administer
and enforce the Constitution (The Law) with integrity, FFF consistently, consistent with and conducive to
the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights.

The government (establishment) is guaranteed the finances by the Constitution (document) through the
collection of taxes and the establishment has demonstrated over indulgence to that endeavor.

All things being fair we would expect at the very least due diligence to the application of The Law in
administering and enforcing it consistent with and conducive to the Constitution which ultimately the
individual’s guaranteed rights of equal protection and benefits are dependent on.

I have extracted some excerpts from the Act which are of particular importance which must be addressed
irreproachably with integrity FFF by the government personnel as they are fundamental to the moral
society guaranteed by the Charter and ultimately it is the Federal Government which provided the
guarantee making it their responsibility to put a modus operandi in place capable of backing the guarantee.
This is a matter of common sense and common law where sanity must prevail.

Constitution Act, 1982


Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms


1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject
only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic
society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of
the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Obviously inconsistencies with the Constitution must be addressed immediately and


amended so as no further continuity of the inconsistency can occur depriving someone of
their Charter rights where left unattended an individual would be forced to pay the
extravagant wages of lawyers as they waste time debating something that has been

12
guaranteed and ultimately a huge waste of tax payers money tying up the legal system
paying for all the costs coincidental to it being in itself a humongous deprivation to the tax
payer.

Having said that it is fundamental to the non deprivation of the tax payer that the
government personnel administer and enforce The Law effectively and efficiently proficient
to purpose and consistently be able to demonstrate due diligence to the endeavor.

Reality Attests

The stage is set, the government structured and financed under the authority of the
Constitution, the Revenue department in place to collect the taxes and the government
personnel in place responsible to administer and enforce The Law irreproachably with
integrity FFF consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights.

The evidence you are about to be presented is irrefutable to the fact the government
personnel are anything but the irreproachable responsible people of integrity prerequisite of
the Constitution and it is to this endeavor I have provided the irrefutable evidence to the
government personnel whose e-mail addresses and fax numbers are listed on the last page.

They have all been provided my web site address http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-


force/web/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms which addresses the issues and my
efforts to have them dealt with.

They have all been provided my web site address http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-


force/web/law-society-of-lower-tier where the evidence can be found should they have misplaced the
evidence I had previously sent them.

The purpose of this initiative is to compile and articulate the issues as clearly as I am capable of to
demonstrate the deficiencies and incompetence of the government personnel to structure a legal
system, effective and efficient consistent with their obligation under the authority of the Constitution
(document) to put a modus operandi in place consistent with the Constitution conducive to the
support of the individual’s guaranteed rights as provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.

This document upon completion will not only identify and prove the inherent inadequacies of the
present legal system but will identify the government personnel responsible for the deficiencies and
the government personnel responsible to deal with them in a manner consistent with the
Constitution.

The evidence will prove the government personnel responsible for the deficiencies and the
government personnel legally responsible to deal with the issues have not only been provided with
the evidence but in fact are united in a conspiracy against the Canadian people and have been
deliberately irresponsible to the people and their obligations to The Law for personal financial gain to
the abhorred humongous detriment to the moral majority to the extravagant benefit of the immoral
minority thereby creating a two tier system which is abundantly apparent to which reality attests.

The Rich get Richer and the Poor get Poorer


Government personnel wages and benefits far surpass that of the public sector

That is “HOW IT IS” in reality but not “HOW IT IS” supposed to be by Law
13
This document will irrefutably prove the office of the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of
Canada is behind the conspiracy against the moral majority and the members of the Law Society of
Upper Canada accomplices to the conspiracy which includes the people whose e-mail and fax
addresses appear on the last page of this document.

Upon completion of the compilation of this document I shall forward a copy to each of these
addresses providing them the opportunity to address the issues consistent with their obligation to the
people of Canada to play a major role consistent with and conducive to the authority granted them
under the Constitution where there must be seamless continuity, department to department
consistent with and conducive to the Constitution with emphasis upon the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights of which they have been financed and accepted benefit binding them to their obligation
to administer and enforce The Law consistent with and conducive to the Constitution (document)

Constitution Act, 1982 was enacted by the government personnel of authority under the Constitution
of 1867 who ceded the spirit of The Law to be that of God which is supported by

Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms


1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject
only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic
society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of
the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with
the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Whereas the spirit of God is consistent with the spirit of the letter of The Law
The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada Lawyers Rules of Conduct.

(103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit
as well as in the letter.

With the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 with the inclusion of the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms the government personnel of authority were immediately obliged and responsible to
restructure the Legal System consistent with and conducive to the support of the guarantees made to
the individual as provided by the Charter and I reiterate it is the responsibility of the Federal
Government and their assigns having authority to enact the Constitution Act, 1982 to back the
guarantee consistent with and conducive to it in the spirit of God and The Law which is one and the
same which is inconsistent with the traditional values of the government personnel who enacted it

14
and in fact it is due their inconsistencies with the spirit of God the Charter was included in respect of
the people and their spirits conducive to a moral society in the spirit of God.

The evidence will irrefutably show the spirit of the Office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada and the spirit of the Office of the Ontario Attorney General were not of the spirit of
God and The Law prior to the 1982 enactment of the Constitution and they have not changed today
as required by the 1982 enactment of The Law (document)

Not only will the evidence found or referenced herein irrefutably prove it but they will ultimately
debate it proving unequivocally their consistency to the unscrupulous traditional ways prior to the
1982 enactment being persistently consistent with that which the evidence irrefutably proves that the
government personnel of the Constitution (establishment) administer and enforce The Law
(document) illegally inconsistent with it for no other purpose than personal gain and benefit to the
humongous detriment to the moral majority.

Having said that which is a reiteration upon reiteration, failure of any of the government personnel,
whose e-mail addresses are listed on the last page, to make every effort to address the issues
referenced herein so as to restructure the Legal System consistent with and conducive to the support
of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights will be conclusive proof of their part in the conspiracy
against the people and will be held accountable to the people and immediately be relieved of their
duties along with separation of any rights of financial benefit, in particular pension funds.

These funds will be paid back to the rightful owners, being the taxpayers and any attempt to obstruct
this justice will find them up on charges of treason and conspiracy which will be their responsibility to
finance their own defense for the tax payer is not inclined to defend those who conspired against
them.

Those government personnel who refuse to perform their service consistent with the Constitution as
they have been financed to do will experience the wrath of the tax payer and that is all you will take
to the bank and you can bank on it along with the publication of your shame.

I remind you all, that any traditions, laws, policies, precedence, etal not consist with the Constitution
have no force or effect as per their inconsistencies with The Law.

Any inference that the intent of The Law was not to actually back the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights will be deemed as an admittance of precisely what it is. A government purposely
misrepresenting The Law to deceive the people and representative of that which the evidence
irrefutably proves that the government conspired against the people for personal benefit.

Kind of a Catch 22

You either act FFF with integrity to deal with the issues in Lawyer Files 1-3 in public with the
initiative to expose the Ontario Attorney General for what he is as the evidence irrefutably proves or
you will irrefutably prove that is what he is by not attempting to expose him, with emphasis on what
you are.

To that eventuality I commence with: whereas the evidence printed in blue is to be found at the
bottom of the page on my web site Law Society of Lower Tier Canada http://groups.google.com/group/charter-
democracy-force/web/law-society-of-lower-tier

This is the true story of my venture into futility to seek justice in accordance with the Constitution
(Document)where the individual’s are guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms by the Federal

15
Government whereby upon the Federal Government personnel and their assigns commonly known as
the Constitution (Establishment), upon acceptance of financial benefit in monetary gains and
benefit and sworn to uphold The Law of our country to carry on duties consistent with and conducive
to the individuals guaranteed Charter Rights are bound to that endeavor

The venture into futility is evident in itself as to the irrefutable proof of the incompetence of the
Constitution (Establishment) to structure a system competent to support the provisions of the
guarantee of the individual’s Charter Rights and Freedoms which is fundamental to the Constitution in
the spirit of God which is the very foundation and spirit of the Canadian people where the supremacy
of God is recognized.

Whereas the Constitution (Document) is the Supreme Law of Canada which recognizes the
Supremacy of God it is prerequisite and incumbent upon the Government Personnel,
Constitution (Establishment) be irreproachable in the spirit of The Law and God where
consistency of Moral Conscience is mandatory consistent with the supremacy of
God

This is fundamental to the foundation and spirit of Canada

The evidence contained within these writings and referenced herein is not only irrefutable as to the
Constitution (Establishment’s) incapability to uphold The Law as mandated but it is conclusive as to their
intent which is to have the people believe they are the responsible irreproachable people demanded of the
Constitution (Document), The Law to administer and enforce The Law consistent with and conducive to
The Law as they carry on consistently in their unscrupulous traditional ways so entrenched under the
guidance of the Law Society of Upper Canada who has the audacity to admit to me either stated or
implied for all the world to see they do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights
and Freedoms as theirs members administer and enforce The Law consistent to their belief while having
the people believe they are attentive to their obligations to the people to uphold The Law which they have
sworn to do.

Somewhat of a befuddlement which will remain in perpetuity unless the befuddlement is unfuddled which
the evidence irrefutably does and all that remains is to be read in the spirit of The Law as defined by The
Law as the Spirit of God

The Purpose of The Law (Document) is to define the spirit which must exist in the conscience of minds of
every individual of Canada to be in compliance with The Law and the purpose of The Law (Establishment)
is to assure every individual’s actions are in compliance with The Law.

The conscience of mind is a private and personal thing unique to each individual
where their body functions demonstrate their individual ability to control it consistent
with the spirit of The Law in moral conscience under the supremacy of God.

Upon an individual’s demonstration of ineptness to the endeavor it is the responsibility of the Constitution
(Establishment) each individual of the Government personnel to demonstrate by body function their
acceptance of the responsibility assigned to them which they have accepted in principle demonstrated by
their willing acceptance of financial benefit for the purpose which ultimately requires due diligence

16
attentive to aiding all individuals to be competent to control the conscience of their mind consistent in
moral conscience under the supremacy of God which is the spirit of The Law (Document)

The Constitution (Document) and the Constitution (Establishment) are cohabitants of the supreme law of
Canada, housed in the Constitution where the Document is the dominant tenant and the Establishment the
subordinate tenant.

It is incumbent upon all subordinates to identify any and all insubordinates and evict them from tenancy
due their tendency to be inconsistent of their mandated obligation where every individual of the
government personnel plays a vital role in the seamless continuity of The Law which governs us all
equally as defined and guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Due to the befuddlement of circumstance where the evidence referenced in


these writings and all things in reality attests to a conspiracy perpetrated by the
government personnel mandated to administer and enforce The Law making it
impossible for the individual of Canada to receive the justice guaranteed by the
Charter in the courts of our land where the whole Legal System is under the
control of the conspirators I have taken the liberty under the authority of The
Law to conduct a criminal investigation in the manner of a Public Inquiry
which commenced publicly on September 1 2006 where some of the major
players of the conspiracy were provided copies of the BLACK BOOK, a copy
of said book can be found on my web site BLACK BOOK.
http://groups.google.com/group/black-book

The government personnel addressed in the 15 Lawyer Files which can be found on my
web site Law Society of Lower Tier Canada http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-
force/web/law-society-of-lower-tier have all been provided copies of the BLACK BOOK and during
the course of the Public Inquiry were provided copies of the 15 Lawyer Files, dated March
30 2007 and early April 2007.

The evidence in the BLACK BOOK implicated them in the conspiracy and the evidence in
the 15 Lawyer Files was presented to them providing them the opportunity to address the
issues and respond in defense of the charges laid against them but they declined to do so.

The evidence being irrefutable as to their negligence in performance of their mandates


authorized under the authority of the Constitution (Document) which requires them to act
responsibly consistent in the spirit of The Law which is in the spirit of God consistent with
and conducive to the provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms offered
them the opportunity to deal with the issues but reality itself attests to the fact they have not
and since they have offered nothing in their defense to this day November 11 2007 I upon
the authority of the Constitution (Document) declare them guilty of willfully misusing the

17
powers entrusted to them by the Canadian people to conspire to structure a system
consistent with and conducive to the special interests of the members of the Law Society of
Upper Canada who have by their own admittance adamantly stated or implied their
members do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter of Rights and
Freedoms proving beyond all and any reasonable doubt the Federal Legal System operated
by the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada are incompetent to administer and
enforce The Law in a manner to achieve justice consistent with the spirits of The Law and
God conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as the document Law Society
of Upper Canada asserts and a copy is to be found by going to web site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force/web/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
click on Do your part.doc and go to page 11 where you can click on to said document
proving irrefutably their ineptness to reason let alone sit to judge as to whether evidence
presented to them is beyond reasonable doubt to administer justice in accordance with The
Law they are obliged to administer and enforce..

Due Regard to the credibility of the evidence

To dismiss any allegations by the conspirators or their supporters that the evidence
lacks credibility I offer the irrefutable evidence that the evidence provided during the
course of this trial was submitted by the conspirators themselves demonstrating their
pathetic incompetence to their own defense having been provided all the resources
financed by the Canadian people and being educated in the system of the ins and outs
to access the resources with the support of the members of the Law Society of Upper
Canada all free of charge, compliments of the Canadian tax payer having
astronomical advantage over this individual and ultimately every individual of
Canada is pathetically the greatest laugh of the ignorance of the self proclaimed
intelligence of the human resources of the Constitution (Establishment)

I now present the evidence submitted during the course of the trial and I highly
recommend you have ample change of underwear at the ready as the government
personnel do their Abbot and Costello version of administering and enforcing The
Law

To set the stage

Evidence printed in blue is available for all to see on my aforesaid web sites which the conspirators
have all be informed.

(1) Don Wilson, my former tenant and president, director of BioSafe Natural Technologies Inc. a
company that I had invested in committed fraud over $100,000 and filed false and misleading information
with the ORHT over $43,000 in front of the judicator Nancy Fahlgren who doesn’t give a damn in a
building financed by the people to administer Justice under the Constitution Act, 1982.
WHY?

18
Evidence
E-mail to Toronto Sun Editor dated October 8 2006 (73 page document)
-commentary and compiled evidence that was provided at the hearing and to Dave Grech- coordinator
Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
-disk copy of recording of hearing for first day June 30 2005 (Start at 3:21:00 +/-)
.Note: The second and final day of the hearing July 28 2005 was not recorded. WHY?
_____________________________________________________________________________________

When you read the 73 page document (3) Sun Editor you will know my former tenant committed the
crimes as stated in (1) above.

On pages 37 and 38 of document (3) To: Sun Editor October 8 (Part 2).doc on web site Law Society of
Lower Tier Canada http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force/web/law-society-of-lower-tier is a copy of
the dispute signed and faxed on my telephone line by Don Wilson on June 10 2005 to the Ontario Rental
Housing Tribunal from my basement where he resided as my former tenant.

I have a copy of it because it printed out on my fax machine upstairs where I live at 34 Riverglen Drive,
Keswick, On. L4P 2P8

Don Wilson was filing his dispute to my application of June 6 2005 to have him evicted for arrears of rent
of $8000 at the time (pages 19-23) and for failing to vacate the premises as agreed (Pages 24-26)

You will note on page 38 that if Don Wilson had not filed his dispute within 5 days of receiving my
application to evict him June 6 2005 there would be no reason for a hearing.

He filed his dispute and the hearing went on as scheduled for June 30 2005 and he and I were both present.

I offer this to make it clear that it was Don Wilson who filed the dispute to the ORHT so you will know
when you read the September 6 2005 letter from Dave Grech coordinator of Investigations and
Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing that he erred and seemed to be of the
understanding that I filed Don Wilson’s dispute with the ORHT which is absolutely ridiculous. Right?

After all, I would hardly drive down to Scarborough and pay $150 to have him evicted and then file a
dispute for him to prevent the eviction.

Immediately one has to wonder the competence of Dave Grech who not only works in this field of
endeavor but is the head man.

So upon reasoning this, the answer as to WHY? he did it, with the benefit of all the evidence in hand was
to deceive me in believing he had no reason to commence or cause to commence proceedings against Don
Wilson.
He obviously did not want to prosecute Don Wilson even though the evidence called for it and it is his
responsibility to do so.
This raises another WHY?
Why didn’t he want to perform his duty? This we understand when we answer the WHY’s? in (1) above

During the course of the first day of the hearing June 30 2005 the judicator Nancy Fahlgren was not
prepared for this case which she called Bizarre because there were matters dealing with shares I owned of
a company which Don Wilson was president, ceo, treasurer, director and whatever else he wanted to be.

19
She kept wondering why I introduced documents regarding the shares when we were here at a rental
Tribunal.

That is where the offense of filing false and misleading information with the ORHT under s.206 (2) of the
Tenant Protection Act, 1997 by Don Wilson comes in.

His dispute indicated he had paid up rent to February of the year 2009 due to his fabrication as to how the
shares I bought of his company included rent to the year 2009. This valued at more than $43,000

That is why I was introducing evidence as to how I actually bought the shares which is all covered in the
(3) document Sun Editor document provided in 2 parts, Sun Editor October 8 (Part 1).doc Sun Editor
October 8 (Part 2).doc proving Don Wilson’s dispute to be false and misleading information.

I had attached a copy of the 4 page May 6 2005 agreement to the application to evict and a copy of this can
be found on pages 27-31 where Don and I both signed all 4 pages witnessed by my mother.
Don Wilson agreed to vacate my premises on May 31 2005 on page 1 of the agreement (Page 27) and on
page 4 (Page 30) he agreed he owed me so much rent plus interest to the date of signing.

At first Nancy Fahlgren was mystified as to why she was reading all about shares on the agreement and
what it had to do with the issues at hand regarding rent but I eventually got her to understand that Don
Wilson had signed two different stories.

He had signed the May 6 2005 agreement to confirm he owed me rent and agreed to leave on May 31 2005
and he had signed and filed a dispute with ORHT stating he was paid up until February of the year 2009.

At first she couldn’t even find a copy of Don’s dispute but eventually she found a copy of one page of the
dispute as on page 37 and I asked her to compare it with the copy I had which she did and confirmed.

I was quite a novice at playing Perry Mason but quite surprised at how incompetent she was at playing
Judge Judy.

The case had been going on for a while and she had no idea why I was evicting Don and why he was
disputing the eviction.

Seems to me that information would be fundamental and the place to begin and once I fumbled my way to
bring her into the reality we were attempting to address, things ran a whole lot smoother and soon she
acknowledged that she was coherent to what I was trying to prove.

That’s when I said “There ought to be a law” which I was sure there was and she confirmed “There is” and
went on to articulate how she has the authority to forward the case onto the Investigations and
Enforcement Unit which of course she never did and that portion of the recording is removed
WHY?
On the recording of the first day of the hearing June 30 2005 you will hear Don Wilson denying having
ever seen or signed the May 6 2005 agreement Pages 27- 30) or the April 13 2005 agreement (Pages 31 -
36) which was basically the same as the May 6 2005 which replaced it.

I provided the witness to the April 13 2005 agreement who attested to the fact that Don Wilson had indeed
signed it and of course my mother had witnessed the May 6 2005.

20
The inherent problem here is both of the agreements had identical signatures which Don had signed but
they were not the signature he normally uses as you will see on his dispute and other documents to be
found in the
Sun Editor 2 part document and his denying have ever signed the documents proves his intent was to deny
their validity some time down the road when I attempted to cash in on my investment.

That is clear and simple fraud valued at over $100,000 as is the false and misleading information he filed
with the ORHT which is not only an offense under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 but an offense under
the Constitution Act, 1982 in matters of fraud regarding the $43,000 in his bid to have paid up rent to
February of the year 2009

Toward the end of the first day of the Tribunal hearing June 30 2005 I provided an abundance of evidence
to prove everything Don Wilson had stated on his dispute and reiterated at the hearing was false and he
was asked to respond to a 14 page chronicle (Pages 46-59) I had also provided to the judicator by July 21
2005 to both me and the ORHT before the second day of the hearing July 28 2005 which he never did but
there was nothing he could dispute and he didn’t.

Nancy Fahlgren reviewed the evidence over the month between June 30 2005 and the second day of the
hearing July 28 2005 and when the hearing continued at the beginning of the second day she announced
the hearing would not be recorded that day. WHY?

The ORHT found for me on August 8 2005 in Order TNL-67103 (Pages 60-62)

There was no mention as to whether or not Nancy had commenced or caused to commence proceedings
against Don Wilson so I telephoned her office to find out on August 10 2005 as soon as I had received the
Order TNL-67103 in the mail but I was told I could not communicate with her and nobody could help me
but I did order a copy of the recording of the hearing and paid for it immediately by visa. It was nearly
three weeks before I received a disk copy of the hearing and I had to phone to inquire where it was.
WHY?
WHY did it take so long and WHY was the second day of the hearing not recorded and WHY was
information removed from the recording of the hearing.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__
(2) September 6 2005
Dave Grech coordinator Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing refuses to commence or cause to commence charges against Don Wilson. WHY?
It took near a month to get Dave Grech to write to explain why he refused to commence proceedings
against Don Wilson and when he finally did his reasons were absurd and incoherent to the evidence.
WHY?
Evidence
- Dave Grech compiled correspondence Sept. 1 2007.doc
- Lawyer File # 2 March 30 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__

The document Dave Grech compiled correspondence Sept. 1 2007.doc indicates my efforts to get him to
write me to explain why he would not commence or cause to commence proceedings against Don Wilson.

21
I faxed his office several times commencing August 10 2005 with many phone calls returned from snarly
staff of his office refusing to respond in writing even though I had requested written responses each fax but
eventually Dave Grech wrote me with a ridiculous response incoherent to the evidence which caused me to
drive down town to his Toronto office where he was not available to see me.
I left all the evidence with Raol Pascual as referenced in the document Sun Editor and a-disk copy of
recording of hearing for first day June 30 2005 (Start at 3:21:00 +/-)
He refused to respond so I wrote again and again and he has a copy of all 15 Lawyer Files but no response.

So again the question WHY?


WHY was his staff so snarly and unaccommodating? WHY wouldn’t they write?
WHY would Dave not just do his job as he is responsible to do?
Surely he would not do so on his own. Right?
He must have consulted with someone, probably from the beginning and I am thinking probably back
before the 2nd day of the Tribunal hearing when they decided not to record that day of July 28 2005.
What do you think?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_
(3) September 30 2005
Rick Hennessey Regional Manager OHRT refuses to commence proceedings against Don Wilson stating
the case was closed and wouldn’t be keeping my faxes on file.
WHY?
-Tampered with evidence- removed part of recording WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 1 March 30 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__
Rick Hennessey responded rather quickly on September 30 2005 the same day of my second fax.
The first request being just two days earlier on September 28 2005. WHY so quick
WHY so quick unless he had already consulted someone on the issues?
WHY would he not just do his job and forward the file on to Investigations and Enforcement unless he
had consulted with someone and I am thinking probably back before the 2nd day of the Tribunal hearing
when they decided not to record that day of July 28 2005.
What do you think?

So many WHY’s so let’s see what Hon. John Gerretsen has to say, after all he is the Minister of
Municipal Affairs and Housing whose duty was to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act,
1997 which the ORHT operates under and Hon John charged the Investigations and Enforcements Unit
with that responsibility and Dave Grech heads the Unit.
Surely Hon. John would like to know what’s going on. Right?
_________________________________________________________________________
_
(4) September 26 2006
Hon. John Gerretsen Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing refuses to review Dave Grech’s decision not to
commence proceedings against Don Wilson because he trusts Dave Grech and refuses to investigate the ORHT
because they are independent of the government. WHY?
The Minister’s duty was to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and the ORHT
operates under the ACT.

22
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 3 March 30 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__

Well, I guess that clears it all up. Look Jane see Spot run
Hon. John trusts Dave Grech, even though he read the evidence in one hand and sees no reason not to trust Dave
Grech on the other hand who leaves so many WHY’s unanswered. (See copy of Hon. John’s letter of September 26
2006 on pages 6 and 7 of Lawyer File # 3)
Hon. John states the ORHT is an independent agency at arms length of the government and he has no right to
interfere. WHY?
The government interferes with anything it wants and he suggests they have no right to interfere.
How could Hon. John perform his duty as Minister to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act
if he didn’t interfere so to speak, one way or another?

I believe they were all informed of my concerns prior to their responses and were advised. Do you think?
Well let me inform that they were informed because on September 1 2006 I sent them all a copy of the
BLACK BOOK dated September 1 2006 addressed to Premier Dalton McGuinty, a copy of which can be
found on my web site BLACK BOOK http://groups.google.com/group/black-book

So now what do you think?

When I say they have all received a copy I mean everyone referenced in the 15 Lawyer Files and more
including my MP Peter Van Loan.
So you see, the Federal Government is linked here since September 2006 but Peter Van Loan has never
responded. WHY?
Maybe it was something I said, in the BLACK BOOK that is.

Come on now, we’re only at Lawyer File # 3. You have got to keep up.
If you are not coherent at this point you won’t make it to the finish so go back to the beginning and keep focused or
let your kids handle it. I shouldn’t have to remind any of you of the seriousness of this exercise. Should I?

It’s all been Dick and Janed to you but you are adults and it’s time to accept responsibility to be coherent to the
facts because you certainly will be called upon to act responsibly in your prominent positions of the Canadian Legal
System administering and enforcing The Law consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter
Rights and Freedoms.

So I’ll stop here for a while, catch up on some sleep while you earn your pay and study the material introduced so
far. Let us not forget what Confucius says.

“Learning without thought is labor lost, thought without learning is perilous”

I should mention that this is a reality test and the answers are not in the back or front of the book.
This one you must solve for yourself even though the answers are obvious scrawled this way and that on
every page from front to back consistent with that which is to be made out which is written between the
lines.
It’s best to know the truth because your future depends on you and the decision you make.
Sure it’s difficult to break bad habits but there comes a time ……and it’s closing fast
Well here we go, all up to speed now, Right?

23
Criminal crimes were committed in a building financed by the people as part of the Legal System of
Canada to administer and enforce justice consistent with and conducive to the guaranteed protection of
every individual of Canada where attentiveness to deterrence is priority number one where criminals
unpunished are predictable to spread the word of weaknesses in the system and being more experienced
will be more difficult to be caught the second time and made to pay for their crimes leaving many victims
in their wake not counting the victims dependents and the noticeable change which can reflect upon his
work affecting employers and friends and so on like that.

All things that are most comprehendible once victimized that need not be if you just do the jobs you are
financed and responsible to do.

If you are not coherent to these realities then you can not possibly be coherent to and capable of the job
you are responsible to do where you must not only be irreproachable but be competent of what you are
irreproachable of and required to be.
The person at the top must be most weary and alert to all realities involving human beings especially when
involved in the Legal System dealing with the inherent problems of dealing with the conscience of human
minds where the government personnel of the Legal System are unfortunately human and given the
importance and purpose of your jobs on the moral conscience of society it is of dire consequences and a
most pathetic example of hopelessness and despair if you can’t control the conscience of the God damned
government personnel charged with that mandate.

It is to this endeavor I assert every effort for the benefit of humankind and I must emphasize that I did not
set out on this trek as a career, you people did and financed to do so, whereas I am not but I do it because it
chanced upon me having some experience in the environment 2 ½ years ago learning quickly as I go due
my understanding of purpose other than a reasonable job to support my desires.

As everything I state can be reasoned to be true, I do this because it’s the right thing to do, not to support
me which I make nothing from. The reason is most worthy, though I am no Mother Theresa yet could put
many of such types out of work by dealing with the root of the problems rather than the symptoms.

It’s kind of like when the boat springs a leak, bail as fast as you can, get back to dry land and fix the damn
leak.

Until the leak is fixed take every precaution that some innocent person, obviously naïve to the danger
doesn’t launch it with wife and family.

It’s all too simple if you deal with it simply and when there are clear and imminent dangers to anyone there
simply is no time to meander through the web of deceit you people have woven to find if there is a legal
way to save somebody, for alas your sorrys don’t help and too bad you don’t feel the realities of sorry as
the victims do.

If you can’t figure the ramifications of your conspiracy on the realities of the people because you are
ignorant of the experience don’t worry because your persistence to ignorance will find you there but
unfortunately when you understand the people will understand your nature not worthy of their trust,
destined to roam the earth in hopelessness and despair along with them.

You people are comfortable with every opportunity to do the right thing. You are in a peaceful
environment with food on the table assured tomorrow.
Nothing stopping you from thinking

24
Now stop that, you can’t always be thinking about how to use people.
WHY not help them? Hell, that’s what you are paid to do.

Doesn’t get better than that, being paid to help people. What a novel idea.

Just think, I mean really, Just think.

Okay you have done it and don’t get it.


Have a look in the mirror and look at a pathetic fool and ignorant disgrace for a human being who accepts
money and benefit to help people who helps themself instead and stands there laughing.

Well if you understand that then you will understand when we laugh as others who don’t understand reach
out in revenge.

Oh, I won’t be part of it but I will laugh and most likely will be sorry later but heck, what could I do being
just one individual against the world.

If only there was something that could be done before the predictable, eh?

People are so predictable in general yet individually unpredictable unless of course you know the
individual’s particular perception due to circumstance beyond our knowledge not being familiar with them
and all.

How would we know that the individual hadn’t eaten well for a while assuring his family was okay or
perhaps another couldn’t make it playing your silly games so set out to do the best they could which found
them in jail with the family left to fend on their own and the oldest son thinks he’s smarter than dad and
leaves no witnesses as the family survives and others don’t.

I don’t know, every once in a while I go crazy where I seem to understand reality better and then I give my
head a shake and realize there is no possible way to understand it no matter what I experience because that
is just “How it is” as Randy Craig of the OPP Anti-Rackets tells me. See Lawyer File # 8

WHY? Is the question that persistently pops up.

WHY is the sky blue? Personally I don’t give a damn although I have been taught and don’t remember
because the information is irrelevant to me as is what weather tomorrow brings because I am stuck here
behind this computer trying to get people to give a damn about their jobs which benefit them well but their
incompetence to it does nothing for the people who pay them to help them.

It’s something one isn’t likely to want to think about, is it?

I mean like when we have to go to the hospital we know what to expect and yet every where are sick
people. Some don’t appear to be as sick as one would expect and others appear to be sicker than one could
have imagined unless of course you have been there, done that and survived.

Don’t matter, once you get yourself the hell out of there and back to reality not being a doctor and all, what
can you do?

25
So life goes on to death.

That’s just “How it is” Right?

Lucky there are doctors who act like doctors doing the best they can for what they are paid to do and lucky
for us they have their hearts in it regardless if it is for the money.

There success depends on their ability to be successful with their patients, putting their heart into learning
the job for the purpose intended and each individual gets what they need and deserve.

It all works and too bad there isn’t more of them.


Surprising too because most parents wouldn’t mind their kids growing up to be doctors or at least marrying
one, even though their motives aren’t necessarily directed to help people and in fact more in the nature of
helping themselves.

Too bad success in your business isn’t founded on what you can do for a moral society as the people
desperately need and in fact trust and believe you are competent to the task.

Can you imagine? Yes I suppose you have. Then what would we need you people for, if you ever
accomplished your assignments.

So it becomes a way of life you enjoy and the people suffer until they are so bad off and receive the proper
care of a doctor

Well, got through that and I’m back insanely trying to do my best sanely for sanity and the well being of
all and of course unequivocally me who you all understand when me is you.

_____________________________________________________________________________________
__

(6) August 16 2006


Julia Munro MPP My representative refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 5 March 30 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__

Not a whole lot to say here other than Julia is my Ontario Government representative and she has been
kept apprized of the insanity that is going on and I suppose it’s considered normal to her.

I have copied her letter to me of August 16 2006 to demonstrate the insanity of it all. (See page 24)

Julia informs me that the Ombudsman is considered the last resort, so to speak, and since I have already
been there I am shit out of luck.

Do any of you do anything other than nothing or direct traffic?

I send a preponderance of evidence for you people to read and what do you get out of it.
If the Ombudsman is the last resort and I have covered all the bases WHY do we need any of you?
26
What is it that you do that a kid couldn’t handle and we could assure they are well looked after?

I complain that the Ombudsman does not have a clue how to read a complaint and identify the actual
problem and of course that is the problem that runs rampant throughout the Legal System where there is no
one competent to reality for the Attorney General has cast his spell. See Lawyer File # 4
Lawyers are the enemy of the moral majority led by the Office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada whose actions are monitored by the Law Society of Upper Canada who don’t give a
damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights as documented in the Law Society of Upper
Canada file which you will find by going to web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-
force/web/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms and click on Do your part.doc and go to page
11.

I hardly think a lawyer is about to help, being obliged to abide by unscrupulous traditional values not only
inconsistent with the Constitution and inconsistent with the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights but the
Law Society of Upper Canada adamantly state or imply their members do not give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and they are only obliged to vigorously advance the interests of
their clients or in other words whoever can afford to pay for their services.

I do not know what the statistics are and doubt there are any about how many middle class have to pay for
their lawyers to take a criminal to court who I would presume the majority of them would have their
lawyers paid for by the tax payer and they will get the best defense and appeals the tax payer can afford to
pay while individually they can’t afford a lawyer of their own and often is the case they just write it off as
a lesson learned where the criminal walks and learns nothing other than he or she can get away with
criminal acts and progress on to bigger crimes leaving a great number of victims in their wake before The
Law finally catches up with them.

Lawyers who don’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights are the first to claim
these guaranteed rights for the criminal element as they do everything possible to obstruct the guaranteed
victim’s rights to justice.

Think about it.

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms


1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in
a free and democratic society

This clearly states or implies the individual is guaranteed Charter rights as long as they stay in the
bounds of The Law and should they break them they are subject to sane limitations as can be
justified such as a person allegedly killing someone is likely to be locked up before trial and that type
of thing that is obviously demonstrably justified. Obviously someone is dead who was guaranteed not
to be

They are quite attentive to the individuals guaranteed rights as he or she is innocent with the
evidence stacked against them and yet the innocent victim’s Charter rights are trampled all over
without them giving a damn about it and quite probably the reason there are victims.

I hope I am making myself clear but there is a very good example of reality if you will just study the
aforesaid Law Society of Upper Canada file which proves irrefutably that which I state and in fact I

27
have had to let the matter go because it is not worth putting good money which I don’t have after
bad, good money which is rightfully mine but costs are prohibitive.

The very fact that I would have to pay a lawyer which I can not afford against the particular lawyer’s
client referenced within the said file who can well afford a lawyer obviously because he plays the odds
that I won’t contest the situation and he gains $7000 +or – for his efforts.

Please take the time to read the said file and understand.

The only person who lost is their victim, me who was completely innocent and they did nothing but
bullshit and the Law Society of Upper Canada sees nothing wrong.

This type of thing goes on and on unreported and thusly any statistics would be completely
inaccurate and therefore the issues never addressed.

There obviously is something drastically wrong with the Legal System when the evidence such as
mine in this other matter regarding the criminal acts of my former tenant at the ORHT are left
unpunished and the victim is told how ignorant he is to let somebody take his money and how they
try to warn the public to be careful.

It’s a little too late after the fact and besides that the people are quite aware but regardless criminal
acts happen and when the criminal is caught in the act he or she must be brought to justice for
deterrence sake if nothing else.
But what about the victims rights to justice and in particular the fact is the victim is the innocent
party and his rights surely must exceed that of the criminal element in an intended moral society
which surely must be the intent of the Constitution where Canada is founded upon principles that
recognize the supremacy of God.

The Legal System has everything backwards or any which way it can to benefit the members of the
Law Society of Upper Canada to the great detriment of the moral majority and the facts are
everywhere to prove it but who cares?

Obviously that is what my evidence proves along with many other detriments to the moral majority.

I am not asking anyone of you to present the case before the courts about the conspiracy because
that of course would be futile.

I am asking for a PUBLIC INQUIRY as I have always to deal with the issues realistically.

As I continue to present the evidence you will see it is overwhelmingly irrefutable to that which I
state.

As for Hon John Gerretsen, he must be brought to trial for obstruction of justice which will ultimately
lead to the Attorney General of Ontario and then the Federal Attorney General which would obviously
reveal the conspiracy publicly.

The inherent problem though is documented in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney
General” where the police may consult with the Attorney General or his agents, the Crown Attorneys
but it is up to the police to lay the charges then it is up to the Attorney General whether or not to go
ahead and prosecute.

Now you tell me how the individual can ever expect justice in Canada when the Attorney General
doesn’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights?

Think about it.


Oh, you have and don’t give a damn.

28
Somebody is going to give a damn and then there will be a lot of people giving a damn that they
never thought was within them.

Think about it

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be
deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

It is the criminal who is to be deprived and the evidence discerns who is who

29
30
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_
(5) June 9 2006
Ombudsman decline to help for ridiculous reasons. WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 4 March 30 2007

See Lawyer File # 4


Throughout this file the Ombudsman admit their
limitations to act in a manner their web site falsely
misrepresents to have the people believe they are an
independent agency for the people

31
They affirm that which I allege and the evidence irrefutably proves that the government personnel
mandated to administer and enforce The Law are persistent in their continuity of conspiracy against the
people.
The Ombudsman not only attest to that but by their correspondence to me demonstrates the incompetence
of staff to the challenge even if they were the independent group dedicated to that which their web site
purports them to be.
My first letter to the Ombudsman dated May 31 2006 began Re: Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal and
went on to define the relative issues. See page 8 of Lawyer File # 4
On page 10 of the said document is Janet Ortved’s response dated June 9 2006 listing some of their
precluded limitations and blocked in yellow shows her incompetence to determine the purpose of the
subject matter which began Re: Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal and on 13 demonstrates their
ineptness to investigate in resemblance to that which be considered competent to an investigative authority

_____________________________________________________________________________________
(7) August 14 2006
Premier Dalton McGuinty Suggests Hon. John Gerretsen but refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 6 March 30 2007

On page 6 of Lawyer File # 6 is the response of Premier Dalton McGuinty dated August 14 2006 copied
hereto on the following page 27 who affirms that which I allege that he as well as other government
officials are incompetent to address the issues as presented and remain persistent to have me and others
believe the ORHT and other so called independent agencies are independent and at arms length of the
government.

The Premier begins with the understanding that my case is before the ORHT when actually it was after
and the ORHT had already issued the Tribunal Order TNL-67103 on August 8 2006 which I had received
on August 10 2006 a copy of which is to be found on pages 60-62 of document (3) To: Sun Editor
October 8 (Part 2).doc on web site Law Society of Lower Tier Canada
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

He would have me believe elected representatives such as he the Premier are not permitted to comment on
or intervene in any specific case and must not interfere in the Tribunal Proceedings.

I would have no trouble believing that if that was the issue I addressed to him and repeatedly
addressed to him as documented in Lawyer File # 6 dated March 30 2007 long after Rick Hennessey
of the ORHT adamantly stated the case was addressed and closed as of the Tribunal Order TNL-
67103 dated August 8 2005 (See Lawyer File # 1 page 5)

The Premier has perhaps responded correctly if the Tribunal had been in progress which it was not as
clearly it was done and finished with as far as the ORHT was concerned but not as far I was concerned as
indicated by my online address of the issues to Premier Dalton McGuinty who would have me believe my
concerns were important to him and he sympathizes with my current difficulties at the time.

What I do believe and have every reason to believe given that the Premier has been provided the evidence
that the ORHT Proceedings have been closed as of August 8 2006 he as an elected representative of the
people should deal with the issues in a manner so as to see the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms are guaranteed as demanded by The Law which authorized him to do so.

32
Reality attests to the fact he has not and had no intention to do anything different at the time of his
response August 14 2006 which clearly indicates the attempt to deceive me and the people should the
matter be brought before the people where he could state truthfully under oath that he was under the
misunderstanding the ORHT proceedings were in progress when actually they were not being finished and
done with.

His decline to deal with the issue in Lawyer File # 6 dated March 30 2007 is irrefutable proof to that
endeavor.

It is due to his and others of the government establishment’s persistence to deceive that I compiled the
BLACK BOOK addressed to the Premier and others referenced in the 15 Lawyer Files and my MP Peter
Van Loan among others who have all received copies of the said 15 Lawyer Files which reality attests to
the fact they have all declined to deal with the issues addressed therein, even though the Premier states my
concerns are important to him.

Of course this can not be construed to be a lie either because my concerns are important to him as he will
soon realize just how important they are even though he has addressed them in a manner important to him
as stated consistent with the deception and conspiracy of the government establishment against the people
they purport to serve independent of the importance to me of my concerns, obviously the concerns of every
Canadian individual who he is financed and responsible to address their concerns as per his authority and
responsibility under The Law..

33
And my best wishes to you although I doubt very
much you will be hanged as deserved but a fellow
can’t help but futily wish for the best.

Of course I have addressed the issues to Hon. John


and referred the issues back to the Premier which
persistently accumulate unattended to by the
government personnel whose e-mail and fax
addresses are to be found on the last page herein and
others which will be added to the page in due course
before this publication.

34
_________________________________________________________________________
_
(8) 2006
Michael Bryant Attorney General Ontario Refuses to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 7 March 30 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__
The Office of the Attorney General of Ontario is behind it all in Ontario as it clearly states on their web
site under the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General”

I direct you tohttp://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force/web/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-


and-freedoms Do your part.doc where in due course you will come upon page 8 where you will find a black
bar to click on which defines the presumption that deception is a necessity of Democratic Governments to
control the populace to their way of thinking and benefit which the evidence I have presented irrefutably
proves the Government Establishment are persistent to this ideology today which is illegal and precluded
by the Constitution Act, 1982 whereas the Government personnel of authority of the day ceded to the
supremacy of God with the inclusion of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms where the individual
is guaranteed equality in all matters before and under The Law including equal protection and benefits
whereas the Federal Government personnel and their assigns of the day became responsible to support the
guarantee in diligent manner due the most significant importance vital to each and every individual as their
well being as guaranteed was dependant on the ability of the Government (Establishment) to structure a
system consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guarantee as provided in the Charter and
demanded by the Constitution (Document), the supreme law of Canada which recognizes the supremacy of
God which therefore affirms Moral issues are to be addressed equally consistent with the spirit of The Law
in the spirit of God where they are one and the same and the spirit of the Constitution (Establishment
personnel) must also be one and the same with the spirit of The Law and the spirit of God to which the
Constitution (Document) attests, either stated or implied.

The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” are obvious to be that as to which were in
effect prior to the 1982 enactment of the Constitution and the fact it remains on the web site today
unamended and
restructured so as to remove and reassign responsibilities so as to assure the individual’s Charter
guarantees are diligently supported in a manner due the vital importance to the individual proves
emphatically and unequivocally the government personnel of today are as unscrupulous as they were prior
to the Constitution Act, 1982 where the individual and society as a whole were incompetently protected
under – the rule of law- a well established legal principle of the traditionally unscrupulous members of the
legal profession who the Attorney General was a most prominent member who traditionally adhered to the
protection of -the rule of law- as Guardian of that most elusive concept, hard to easily define which
lawyers depended on for their luxurious life styles as they inanely and superfluously debated an
individual’s rights at their expense and ultimately the humongous bill passed on to the tax payer who is
guaranteed individually not to be deprived
as provided by the Charter who is and predictably so as the Law Society of Upper Canada adamantly
state or imply their correspondence to me compiled in the document Law Society of Upper Canada to be
found by clicking on the aforesaid to be found on page 8 of the aforesaid
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force/web/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
Do your part.doc

35
I reiterate that the Attorney General has been provided all the evidence contained within these writings
including the web sites where the evidence can be found perchance he has misplaced it.

Reality attests to the fact he has not dealt with the issues his web site proclaims his responsibility to do so.

Perchance due the befuddlement it is the responsibility of his agents, the Crown Attorneys I have
addressed the issues to the Newmarket and one of the Toronto Crown Attorneys as per Lawyer Files 13
and 13A

(10) January 10 2006


Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge York Regional Police Refused to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 9 March 30 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__
The York Regional Police are recipients of the evidence referenced within these writings and have demonstrated
extremely well their incompetence to enforce the laws of York Region consistent with and conducive to The Law,
the Constitution which every individual is responsible to abide by and the enforcement officers are responsible to see
to it that every individual accepts their responsibility.

The necessity of each every individual on the Government payroll in the administration and enforcing sector to
accept their responsibility to know The Law is abundantly apparent with the most obvious being impossible to
perform consistent with it as they swear to uphold it.

Having said that the government conspiracy that persists today is due to their persistence to remain ignorant of The
Law they have sworn to uphold to the humongous detriment of the moral society guaranteed by the Constitution
(Document)

Most everyone will cuss and swear in idle fashion which includes the individuals of the Police Forces but to swear to
uphold The Laws of the land which each individual’s guaranteed Charter of Rights is far beyond any realm of idle
swearing which I swear both idly and certain promise they will be held accountable for swearing idly that which
they are responsible to uphold.

It is pathetic how well the Police Forces have extravagantly dipped into the public coffers obviously permitted by
the powers that be to finance Academies to educate their staff and have been pathetically inattentive to The Law
which is their purpose to enforce with integrity FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming, Forthwith which they have no
comprehension of the concept which the evidence irrefutably proves.

I have extracted excerpts from pages 19 and 20 of Lawyer File # 9 being a letter dated January 10 2006 from the
York Regional Police signed by Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge who is clearly intent on remaining under the spell of
the Fiction of the Attorney General as he remains persistently consistent to this day being apprised of the evident
referenced within these writings.

He does however pass the blame to the Legislature which is just one of the irresponsible parties implicated in the
government conspiracy against the people.

He attests to the frustration of his Officers and the victims who are consistently declined the Justice warranted due
the evidence and he has promised to bring the issues of my concerns to the proper authorities when asked and I have
retorted as to why he should wait while another victim is illegally deprived and I questioned as to whether or not he
has addressed the issues previously considering his Officers have learned through considerable experience that
which is acceptable as to be the “Threshold” an invisible line determined at random by the courts which separates

36
who is likely to have a stab at justice in a Legal System where Justice is impossible to achieve as the evidence
contained and referenced herein irrefutably proves.

I have also requested he respond to define what the term “Threshold” means in relation to the evidence I have
presented with regards to the issues in addressed on page 1 (1) with no response ultimately implicating him to the
conspiracy or as Confucius says in so many ways which the following is one
“To see what is right and not do it is want of courage or of principle”
or as I say down right ignorant and proof of his ignorance of The Law he is responsible to uphold leaving
the individual and ultimately every individual deprived as the coffers of public funds are consistently
pilfered and wasted due his and others akin refusal to accept their responsibility conducive to the
guaranteed moral society promised by the Constitution (Document) which they have sworn to uphold.

37
38
39
(11) November 15 2006
Sheldon Prior Ontario Commission on Police Services Refused to help WHY?
Evidence
- Lawyer File # 10 March 30 2007

Sheldon Prior of the Ontario Commission on Police Services cites Ontario laws enacted to address such
issues found herein in a manner consistent with and conducive to the government conspiracy so as to
appear to the people legitimate to purpose which indeed they are legitimate to the persistence of the
government conspiracy which of course is illegitimate to The Law they are responsible to and most
certainly will be held accountable as assuredly as they have absconded with public funds and taken to the
bank can they take the promise of the Constitution (Document) and bank on it with an extraordinary
interest as one by one the individual awakens from the spell initiated by the Attorney General.

With all that has been said within Lawyer File # 10 and all the evidence referenced herein, there is no need
to expand further on their part in the government conspiracy which would only serve to delay the Justice
long waited by the individual’s of the moral majority who are of the spirit of The Law and the spirit of God
as they must be to be incompliance with the spirit of the Constitution the foundation of Canada which
bears so many holes perpetrated by the government personnel of the conspiracy which persistently bang
away at the very foundation of the spirit of Canada which is a most pathetic demonstration of treason
irrefutably proven by the evidence which they have so unwittingly provided assuring either the Credibility
of the evidence or the Credibly of their incredible incompetence to structure a Legal System consistent
with and conducive to the supreme law of Canada where the government personnel must be irreproachable
to the endeavor and are responsible and most certainly will be held accountable as one by one the
unmandated become alert to the fact they have been inundated by the perpetual snow job of the
conspirators and willingly admit to the fact in perseverance of their individual guaranteed Charter Rights
which suddenly become important to them as they are charged individually with treason for their part in
the government conspiracy where the people will be more than reluctant to pay for their defense should
they allow the certain eventually to evolve without their spilling the beans so to speak as to who put them
up to it granting them asylum and continued promise of the pension they so dearly covet and the wages and
benefits they have come to know and so preciously yearn for continuity to that endeavor.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__

(12) March 30 2006


General Details the crimes committed - reference to government
conspiracy
Evidence

- Lawyer File # 11 March 30 2007

(13) April 1 2007


General The world according to me- an appeal for sanity
Evidence

- Lawyer File # 12 March 30 2007


_____________________________________________________________________________________
__
40
These are worthwhile reads if you have not yet shed the spell for as sure as I am certain there is a God in
Heaven which will be believable to all when The Law is administered and enforced in His spirit as
demanded by The Law which authorized your mandates to perform in the service of The Law it demands it
shall for it is written and so shall it be forever and ever. Do I hear an Amen? We are waiting impatiently.
I remind you all this is a legitimate Public Trial under the authority
of the Constitution (Document) whereas the evidence referenced herein
has been provided to the government personnel referenced herein
providing them the opportunity to respond in their defense to the
accusations alleged herein and due their persistence to retain the
consistency loyal to the government conspiracy against the people
obviously inconsistent with their obligations to The Law and the
Canadian people I will have no choice but to find you all guilty as
charged.

Given the very serious nature of the charges I provide you this final
opportunity to make peace with your conscience and ultimately peace
with the moral majority most generously providing you the opportunity
to redeem yourselves in the spirit of The Law and the spirit of God who
are as one as the Constitution (Document)

As per tradition in matters of The Law I have taken the initiative to


address the issues to the supreme court of Canada and the Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada having provided them the
opportunity to address the issues as the Federal Government authority
whereas the Prime Minister Stephen Harper the peoples most highest
representative of authority has declined my invitation to act as the
people’s representative as he has been elected, accepted financial
benefit and sworn to uphold The Law responsibly consistent with The Law
and upon his refusal to do so has willingly left the decision to the
people as to how to deal with the issues and he will be held
accountable in accordance with The Law and I offer his response (see
page 36)to my e-mail to him dated July 19 2007 where his office
responds trusting I will understand that his office is unable to
intervene in any way or provide me with direct assistance in this
matter.

I would like to take this opportunity to assure him I am worthy of his


trust and to extend the courtesy to offer that I trust he will
understand that I trust him to be consistent with and conducive to the
government conspiracy and in fact I trust him to play a major role as
his one and only response clearly states or implies that he can not be
trusted and I do not trust him as he is as inconsistent with his
responsibility to uphold The Law as all the other government
conspirators which the evidence referenced herein is irrefutable to
that most obvious conclusion.

The issues I have addressed are specifically addressed as to the


incompetence of the government personnel to address the issues of

41
government incompetence and the government conspiracy perpetrated
against the Canadian people where each individual is not being
protected in all matters before and under The Law as guaranteed and
provided in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which the
Federal Government and its assigns made signed sealed and delivered to
the Canadian people in the form of a guarantee which is obviously the
Federal Government’s responsibility to back the guarantee being the
guarantors where common sense and common law demands the guarantor back
the guarantee and be able to demonstrate due diligence to that
endeavor.

It is irrational for his Office to even suggest that the issues are of
my personal responsibility requesting the Prime Minister help me
personally when the issues are of such compromise to the well being of
every individual in Canada whereas the evidence has been gathered
during the course of my individual trek for the original purpose of the
acquisition of personal Justice consistent with and conducive to The
Law but once coherent to the government conspiracy and the realization
justice was an improbable conclusion by the present Legal System
personnel as the evidence collected along the way irrefutably proves it
was my intention to help the Prime Minister by providing him the
irrefutable evidence of the government conspiracy even though his
Office has stated fat chance of him helping me.

I gave him an opportunity to back that which he inferred when he


enacted the Federal Accountability Act, 2006 giving him the benefit of
the doubt devoid of sanity where the evidence is irrefutable to the
fact that the government personnel are in on a conspiracy together
against the individuals of Canada of the moral majority.

The very fact he enacted the Federal Accountability Act, 1982 is proof
alone he is aware of the irresponsible unaccountable attitude of the
government personnel but The Law is already in place which demands
responsible personnel be accountable and by enacting the Federal
Accountability Act, 2006 is consistent with and conducive to the
governments persistence to the conspiracy as they would have the people
believe they are acting in good conscience for the benefit of the
people, they who have no conscience and do everything for their benefit
at the extravagant expense to the people.

So in adjourning the Public Trial for today I request you all study and
review the evidence as if your individual person’s well being is the
issue at stake for it is indeed as the evidence clearly indicates and
we meet again which you will be duly notified I request any evidence or
responses in your defense where at that time they will be considered
before final judgment is passed where I reiterate the present available
evidence is conclusive of every persons mentioned and referenced herein
is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt where your reasoning has already
been proven inept to the purpose.

42
Once again I remind you your right to an appeal with the supreme court of Canada is under way and the
evidence to be found at the top of the page of my web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-
force/web/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms has already been presented and I highly suggest
you study this evidence well in conjunction with all the evidence I have presented you before you respond
to me in dispute of that which has been alleged and ultimately proven to be conclusive with no possible
response available to absolve you of that which the evidence irrefutably proves with just one conceivable
exception.
Admit to your role in the conspiracy with explanation as to your involvement
and respond as to how you intend to correct and atone for your part in the
conspiracy, whereas I will study your proposal and upon acceptance and
determined course of action you will endeavor FFF.

Couldn’t be fairer than that? Right?


After all you have been paid to do it since the commencement of your employ
and there is no time like the present. Is there?

It will find you in good stead in retention of your splendid benefits and
pension rather that immediate loss of all and more as you are made to pay for
your own defense and serve due punishment due your part in the crime.

Can’t be a whole lot to think about. Right?

Well don’t just sit there appearing to think about it


It won’t work any more and let’s face it.
It is a most worthy cause which you can relate to.

Yes, that’s right. It is you who will suffer the consequences of your
decisions this time.

No matter your decision you will never be associated to or as an innocent


victim.

Make the wrong decision and you will receive your just reward.
Make the right decision and you will receive your unjust reward as promised
commonly known as plea bargaining for the ultimate purpose of getting to the
bottom as to who is at the top.

It’s all some what of a befuddlement isn’t it?

Anyway, those people who make the right decision will remain anonymous until a
clear and definite plan is established to accomplish the endeavor and of
course once the initiative is under way will have the full support of the
spirit of The Law, the spirit of God and of course let us not forget each and
every individual of the moral majority who will welcome you into their arms as
you help lead the way in the restructured government consistent with the
spirit of The Law conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights as
it should be in a country whose Constitution recognizes the supremacy of God.

How could it possibly get any better than that?

Frank Gallagher
43
January 2 2008

RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Professional Standards Unit


File # 2007-1355445

Dear Commissioner

On November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
complaining that 2 members of the RCMP refused to investigate Government corruption and
conspiracy evidence on my web sites
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
and http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

I received acknowledgement from them dated November 8 2007 Files # PC-2007-2316 and
PC-2007-2317 stating in accordance with the RCMP Act they had forwarded my complaint to
you for appropriate action and you are required to acknowledge receipt of my complaint
within 45 days of receiving it and then provide me a status report every 30 days thereafter.
(See page 2)

I received acknowledgement of receipt dated November 16 2007 from the RCMP


Professional Standards Unit (see page 3)

It appears to me I should have received a status report from you dated December 16 2007 at
the latest making it well over due.

I would appreciate that status report ASAP please

Thank You

Frank Gallagher

44
45
46
January 5 2008

Attention
Staff Sgt Bob MacAdam

RCMP Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam is presently studying the irrefutable evidence of government
corruption and conspiracy against the individuals of the moral majority published on my web site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force.

I have been providing the RCMP the evidence since January 2006 but they have declined to investigate for
the obvious reason the RCMP upper echelon is in on the conspiracy.

The powers that be of the Governments are and have always been the enemy of the world’s population.

2500 years ago Confucius said

“There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVELOCENCE, RIGHTEUOSNESS and MORALITY…finally I began to make out what was
written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE.

The book by Jonathan Swainger explains the Fiction of the Attorney General purportedly necessary in all
forms of government where in a democracy the people are led to believe they have a voice and their
representatives are the people.

The book goes on to state on the unwillingness of the people to suspend disbelief the government will
collapse and rightly so because they are defrauding the people, misrepresenting themselves as they use the
people and their resources for their own personal interests and financial gain.

Law Society of Upper Canada


The 2 Part Law Society document provides the irrefutable proof their members are not required to give a
damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights nor has evidence anything to do with their decisions
regarding their members who are predetermined to be innocent as their job is obviously to diffuse and quash
charges against them. I have e-mailed the said document to the Bar Associations across Canada who see
nothing wrong with the way the Society handled the case proving the conspiracy is country wide.
47
The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” downloaded from the Ontario Attorney General
web site states the Attorney General is responsible to maintain tradition and is responsible to be the
guardian of –the rule of law- that most elusive concept which is a well established legal principle hard to
readily define which is the rule of law that protects the individual and society as a whole.

1) Clearly –the rule of law- is incompetent to protect the individual and society as a whole as defined
in the Charter
2) Clearly the “Roles….Attorney General” has not been revised since the enactment of the
Constitution Act, 1982 with no mention of the Charter.
3) Clearly the laws prior to the enactment were ambiguous as to the rights of individuals and
obviously the government legal personnel didn’t respect the individual or common sense or they
wouldn’t have needed to include the Charter with the 1982 enactment of the Constitution.
4) Clearly the Attorney General was unscrupulous prior to the Charter as indicated in the Jonathan
Swainger book.
5) Clearly the laws prior to 1982 were detrimental to the individuals and clearly the Attorney General
was responsible to Guard it in the traditional unscrupulous manner highly beneficial to lawyers who
debated the individuals ambiguous rights by the most elusive concept-the rule of law- which was hard
to easily define providing them with long lucrative debates to the detriment of a moral society.
6) Clearly if the Attorney General and government couldn’t clearly define it they were incompetent or
unwilling to do it in their best interests.
7) Under such conditions the affluent and influential had a humongous advantage over the moral
majority.

1) Clearly –the rule of law- is incompetent to protect the individual and society as a whole as defined
in the Charter where

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

8) Clearly the Charter was written by the unscrupulous government lawyers attentive to the
fiction of the Attorney General deceptive and misrepresentative to the moral majority.

9) Clearly they weren’t about to stop their unscrupulous deceit, criminally fraudulent ways
cold turkey and the evidence of my encounters with the various government personnel is
irrefutable to the fact with so many unanswered questions in the “Mad Glad mostly
Sad…WHY?” document.

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms


1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and
democratic society.

Regardless, the Charter was included with the Constitution Act, 1982 and the governments must back
the guarantee to every individual as provided in the Charter. That’s the Law either stated or implied.

This is not only Constitutional but Common Law regarding the issuing of a guarantee and all
government employees must comply and administer and enforce it accordingly.

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all
matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and
Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all
matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.
48
The simple fact is they are unscrupulous crooks who thought they could get away with it, but now they are caught with
a prodigious amount of irrefutable evidence against them.

Obviously if the evidence gets out to the people their days of Organized Crime are over freeing the people of the
ramifications of their unscrupulous, deceitful ways of corruption and conspiracy against the individuals of the moral
majority.

That of course is good reason for me to be concerned about my safety and well being and I have considered that
spreading the evidence far and wide.
No guarantee for I suppose my enemies are many with no way of determining who to suspect but it could very well
break the story wide open.

I dare say there may be nary a wink, but regardless I must do what I must do as well as everyone else.

I will continue to spread the word and look for better ways to get the word out because it has been far too long where
the people’s enemy was their own damn government who they trusted and financed as they used their resources to
ransack them.

Obviously we can’t rust their motives when they send our Armed Forces into other countries.

Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam has a particularly daunting task to perform where he has the opportunity to report the
evidence precisely as it shows or report it in a manner consistent with and in support of the conspiracy which will be
obvious, which way he chose to everyone who has studied the evidence.

He is undoubtedly under extreme pressure to report in favor of the conspirators and he knows how Minister of Public
Safety Stockwell Day handled the RCMP Pension Fund scandal when the Standing Committee of Public Accounts
looking into it was ordered to sit on it when it was linked to the DOJ. (Department of Justice.)

Stockwell Day mentioned it in his BENEVELENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY response November 2
2007 to me on the subject where you can find a copy in the “Stockwell Day November 3 2007” document on my
Charter Democracy Force document.

He explained why they decided a Task Force was the best way to go, with tongue in cheek and of course it was the
best way for the government to go as no mention of the DOJ was found in the Task Force report.

The government simply has another agenda not consistent with the Constitution or conducive to the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights which must be immediately brought to a halt, but of course who is there to do it?
That would take a responsible competent irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction to the support of the
Charter guarantee who gives a damn about the hopeless despair of the individual’s of the moral majority.

I am quite sure the moral majority will give a damn and as I say I will do everything possible to assure that eventuality
until my eventuality, untimely or otherwise.

There use to be a person in the services of the government but I retired in August 2004 knowing full well the
harassments of trying to do the right thing as documented in the “BLACK BOOK” and “franklyone” web sites

The situation provided to all you people is rather simple with certain guaranteed security for the work has been already
done, well documented where all you need do is report any harassment while in the performance of your duty which
will escalate and finds its way to the media being the beginning of the end of the Government Organized Crime of
corruption and conspiracy.

Ultimately the beginning of your brand new career in the service of every individual’s government consistent with the
Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights who will be most appreciative as you are justly
rewarded and trusted in the new belated Charter Democracy guaranteed by the Charter Democracy Force having the
power of the people for the people.

Never has the opportunity to do so much by doing so little as to just speak out the truth. Perhaps I belittle the task.
Frank Gallagher 49
1 2
9 0
8 0
2 8

2/16/08
Reality Demands
the Exorcism of the Attorney Generals

Many a tear has to fall


Until the fall of the two tiered system of the bald two faced liars

Fiction Conspiracy Irrefutably Exposed

Comply or Goodbye
50
Constitution Act, 1982
Attorney
Canadian Charter Generals
of Rights and Freedoms

In 1982 the Federal Government enacted the Constitution guaranteeing every Canadian individual rights
and freedoms as defined in the Charter.

With the enactment it was immediately incumbent upon the government personnel to restructure the legal
system to be consistently efficient, irreproachably effective in respect of the support to the guarantee to the
individual whose safety and wellbeing is wholly dependent and guaranteed as per the provisions of the
Charter.

The government personnel employed to administer and enforce the Constitution must be consistently
competent, responsible, efficient and irreproachably effective in continuity from top to bottom coherent
and attentive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular,
without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or
mental or physical disability.
The moral majority is not involved in the administering and enforcing of the law having careers in other
fields of endeavor and they must be able to trust the government personnel of the legal system to do the job
they are financed and must be experienced and proficient to do.

The simple fact is the moral majority is mentally and physically incompetent in varying degrees but all
must be presumed to be incoherent and helpless in respect of the equality of the guarantee without
discrimination whereas the responsibility to ensure the legal system is consistent with the Constitution
conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights is the sole responsibility of the personnel financed
by the people specifically for that purpose.

This is “How it must be” according to the Constitution Act, 1982 the supreme law of Canada which
recognizes the supremacy of God in this Charter Democracy of Canada.

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
http://groups.google.com/group/dear-government

These web sites contain irrefutable evidence the government is not only incompetent to the support of the
Charter Democracy but has in fact conspired against the moral majority in Organized Crime of Corruption
and Conspiracy perpetrated against the individual’s of the moral majority.

I have provided all this information to a prodigious number of prominent members of the government
whose e-mail addresses are listed on the last two pages and their refusal to act appropriately as defined and
demanded of a government elected and financed to administer and enforce the Constitution consistent with
the Charter Democracy conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights implicates them to the
conspiracy.

51
The link to the “Law Society of Upper Canada” 2 Part document published on web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms is indicative of
the M.O. of the government conspirators who adamantly stated or implied their members are not required
to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and evidence is irrelevant to their decisions
where attentiveness is to the support of their members in their persistent effort to ransack the moral
majority.

The web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force attempts to organize the evidence


collected by the http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-
freedoms and the http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society to make it more efficiently and
effectively absorbable for the ultimate purpose of eradicating the conspiracy.

The web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy attempts to expose the conspiracy in a


simple manner but never the less requires a commitment to study the material provided to an honest
conclusion of the analysis.

The web site http://groups.google.com/group/dear-government contains links to some of the other


documents I sent to the members of the government on my e-mail list to demonstrate the efforts I made to
bring them on side with the law, God and the moral majority to no avail as they remain loyal to the
conspiracy irrefutably implicating them.

Lawyer File # 7 (Pages 4-17)


Ontario Attorney General Michael Bryant

The Attorney General has been informed of the government conspiracy which he is a major player and the
evidence on the web sites clearly shows he has acted as any honest to goodness conspirator would do.

“Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” (Pages 12 -15)


The Attorney General wears far too many hats for the Charter Democracy as enacted in 1982

Clearly the Attorney General is a very influential member of the government and is responsible for the
public interest and constitutional matters.

“The Fiction of the Attorney General” by Jonathon Swainger

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

The traditional Democracy described in this book has been superseded by the Charter Democracy 1982
but the Attorney General carries on business as usual in the traditional unscrupulous ways as defined in the
book and the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” as he guards tradition and “the rule of
law” which has made the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada rich at the expense of the moral
majority who get poorer and poorer.

The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and as the "guardian of the public interest".

As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily

52
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.
The rule of law, that most elusive concept is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define
proves the scheming nature of the members of the legal profession not concerned about justice but the
opportunities to make money at the expense of justice and the moral majority who finance the whole
damned legal system.

In 1982 the Federal Government guaranteed the individual rights and freedoms as defined in the Charter
where it is impossible to carry on business as usual in their traditional unscrupulous ways and back the
Charter guarantee.

Overnight these deceiving unscrupulous greedy scum of the earth had to convert to respectable responsible
people, beyond reproach dedicated with fortitude and conviction to the wellbeing and safety of every
individual as guaranteed by the Charter but legal professional tradition is a bad habit to break as the
evidence clearly shows the bullshit of the Attorney General continues to this very day.

Make no mistake; they are in noncompliance with the law no different than pirates, conspirators engaged
in Organized Crime against the moral majority who hold them in trust.

The moral majority finance their overhead by paying for the entire legal system from which they operate in
disrespect of the law, God and the people who elected them believing they represented them and were the
people’s voice.

The web sites identify the conspirators and provide them every possible opportunity to act on behalf of the
people in respect of the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution, which recognizes the supremacy of God
but they remain loyal to tradition which has remained consistent since before Confucius said 2500 years
ago

“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY…finally I began to make out what was written
between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE.”

The democracy of old has been replaced by the Charter Democracy which the government will admit
openly in public to the crowds but refuse to support the guarantee to the individual as they act like a gang
of cowardly bullies beating the individual to the ground.

the Charter Democracy Force


An organization of the people for the people of the moral majority will make them comply with the law
which is in the simplest terms coincidental to the wisdom of Confucius who stated

“Do not do to others what you would not have done to yourself”
“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”

That’s it government conspirators


Comply or say Goodbye

53
To: Province of Ontario March 30 2007
From: Frank Gallagher
Attorney General Lawyer file # 7 34 Riverglen Drive
Michael Bryant Keswick, On.
L4P 2P8
mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org franklyone@hotmail.com

Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom


Canada is founded on PRINCIPLES that RECOGNIZES the
SUPREMACY OF GOD and THE RULE OF LAW

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.
32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the
authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b)
to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the
legislature of each province.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal
benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or
ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Re: Compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997


Compliance with the Constitution Act, 1982

Files to follow (fax)

Lawyer File # 1: Copy of my letter to Rick Hennessey, ORHT


Lawyer File # 2: Copy of my letter to Dave Grech, Coordinator-Investigations and Enforcement Unit, MMAH
Lawyer File # 3: Copy of my letter to Hon. John Gerretsen, Minister of MMAH.
Lawyer File # 4: Copy of my letter to G. Carlino, Ombudsman
Lawyer File # 5: Copy of my letter to Julia Munro, MPP
Lawyer File # 6: Copy of my letter to Premier Dalton McGuinty

Toronto Sun Copy of a file to Toronto Sun dated October 8 2007 will follow in 2 parts under separate cover

Dear Michael Bryant

I am writing to inform you there are serious matters to be dealt with regarding the administration of the “rule of law” in
Ontario and it appears you are the person having the authority to deal with it.
I have downloaded excerpts from the Attorney General Web site which have led me to that conclusion. (See page 9-12)

For the past 19 months I have been endeavoring to find a person with the government who feels they are obliged to take
responsibility for the protection of the people as provided by the Constitution Act, 1982 but all I have heard from those I
have responded to is “Not me”
54
Those who did bother to correspond went as far as to prove they don’t have to give a damn about the people in
Canada.

I am of an entirely different opinion and to support it I downloaded the Constitution Act, 1982 and got to
reading a little and….. Well on the very first line of the Charter I see the words
Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

So the first thing I says to myself “What the hell does that mean?”

I looked up some of the words to see if I could put meaning to this.

founded: - to establish and organize something for the future, for example, an institution or business
- to support something, for example, a conclusion, with evidence or reasoning
- Transitive verb to realize, understand, or locate something for the first time, especially by
studying or observing

principles: – main beliefs, values, philosophies, ideology, morality, ethics, doctrine, principle

recognize: - be familiar with, know, distinguish, make out, identify, be acquainted with, be aware of, be on
familiar terms with

When I first read it I thought perhaps I had to determine who God really was which seemed like a bit much for
one individual to take on considering the scholars have different opinions and when I looked up religions on
the web all I could find is stories and myths that go back before the times of Jesus and I found that the various
religious sects picked up on which ever combinations of these myths that suit their fancy and ran with it.

The religious groups themselves cause people to segregate themselves from each other and provides something
to argue about which has to be the stupidest thing I have ever heard of because they argue about something
which can’t be resolved by present evidence.

Myths gave me a hint right off.

Anyway, when you consider the number of people who faithfully follow their religious beliefs and allow their
leaders to play with their minds it gives me cause for great concern because it sets them up for politicians who
also play with their minds asking them to have faith and trust in them.

Whether or not there is a God and I certainly believe there has to be some explanation to everything but until
we know for fact it is best to keep our wits about us for we are all in this together by no choice of our own.

Doesn’t it make more sense to put emphasis on the choices that we can make and do so with the knowledge
we have and know for sure, to create Heaven On Earth for everyone?
We’d pick up more knowledge along the way and use it for all our benefits which makes more sense than
continually fooling ourselves to a point we would even argue with out the facts.

Such nonsense affects the lives of everyone which allows the leaders who can present the best stories and
make them believable the power to incite their believers into riots which of course is not the best way to go
about finding peace on earth.

So the words “supremacy of God” in matters of THE LAW has nothing to do with beliefs but what the word
God stands for in terms of morality which has to mean the same to each and every one of us if we are to live in
a peaceful law abiding society.

55
The word God must stand for COMMON SENSE and who would argue that yet if we are not all of the same SENSE
there could not be SENSE in COMMON.

Obviously if one’s religion believes they can unite and harm people who don’t share their beliefs, whether they be
based on spiritual or ideological reason then they must ask what soundness they have used in their thinking and answer
it with none at all.

Why have they devoted so much time to their religions: ….for example saying the Lord’s Prayer and not getting the
message?

What do they understand about it and the TEN COMMANDMENTS? Why do people feel they need to worship
someone who they do not know or have ever seen?

Being idolized is a two way street where one struts their pride and ego in front of others who give them the pride and
ego to strut.

God does not strut amongst us in such manner because it is his ways that he wants us to worship and obviously the
only way we will ever live together in harmony is with one COMMON SENSE.

He wants us to think God and his ways, as the only way and obviously He wants us to think for there sure isn’t much
point to things if you don’t

If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery why not mirror God’s way and show Him you truly worship Him.
Insulting His intelligence and wasting the brain He gave us must surely bring tears to His eyes.
Perhaps that’s why oceans are salty.

When kids do something wrong their parents scold them and tell them to think before they act but when they think
remarkably quick and say but you do it they say “Do as I say, not what I do”

That has to be confusing but the most important thing is to think it out to determine what is right immediately after you
do what they say.

It is one thing to obey because your life is in harms way and another to ensure you don’t put it in harm’s way again but
most important is to think it out the whole way to sane conclusion.

In this way there is hope for your future.

By the time we become adults we have struggled for our independence but not until we get out working do we know
what struggle really is.

We think back upon our growing years and remember many times when our parents didn’t seem fair but when we
think about it know they believed they were doing everything for our own good, at least the majorities were.

In the working world we struggle to find a job which pays enough to make life worth while and considering we work a
major part of our waking hours we hope to find a job we can enjoy. It’s quite a balancing act and most of the balancing
goes into lowering our sights.
We plug our way through life, once and while casting a joke about there being nothing certain in life but death and
taxes, put a few more hours in to try to pay down some bills and work our taxes up but we eventually get tired of
complaining and realize we are only bending the ears of others who are trying to forget that the people looking after us
now don’t give a damn about us and are decidedly unfair.

Some don’t give up and continue to vote in a manipulated system where it doesn’t matter who wins for the system will
never be fair as long as the status quo remains.
As we go about our struggles we see films of the starving and people in the hospitals and thank God for our blessings

56
and figure how well off we are comparatively speaking without realizing that God has nothing to do with it for why
would He be giving us who have sinned preferential treatment over the kids that have not yet had a chance to sin.

Go ask your religious leaders for they will give you the answers to help you through it and poor pity those who have
no faith for they will just have to stare at reality with no way to deal with it.

As we finally get to a point where we are able to meet our monthly debt payments with a little left over to reward
ourselves we begin to think a little more about the people starving and many say to themselves it is a battle and I made
it by myself so they can just get up off their lazy asses and do it the same way.

Other’s with their own personal challenges easing have a little more time to think about why reality is as it is, and with
a little more thought past the obvious it becomes abundantly clear that our heads are so messed up that it has to be how
it is.

Isn’t it strange, politicians who know quite well the necessities of people, being people themselves have always
displayed their awareness of our needs by promising remedies for them to get elected and knowing full well how a
hefty raise works wonders for their spirits even though they are not struggling to survive, don’t give a thought to our
spirits, who gave them a descent job in the first place which allowed them to give themselves a raise.
They use our money to take polls and study us to come to a balance of how much they actually have to give out to stay
in power without giving too much, all driven to remain in power for their own ulterior purposes.

I have to admit that low income families need the benefits and I am pleased about that but it is just a patch job like
everything they do with no rational plan to actually change things to how they should be.

Politicians obviously have to appear to be doing something for the people and they are a cunning lot with the
wherewithal to do much more for the people but obviously professionals at slight of hand and skilled at playing with
peoples minds can’t be in it just for the wages and they sure aren’t there to help the people. so……..

Everything they do is obvious to all of them and those of us who are able to assemble a mountain of truths to expose
one humongous lie are few and far between in the general public but the public are far from dumb, just waiting for an
opportunity to pounce where it will make a significant difference..

The evidence I have proves for fact, what they already believe is quite a significant factor in the whole scheme of
things.

I am referring to a society which has many religions and people who are easily led to believe despite the truth will be
pleased to see evidence which supports their beliefs about the government

The key to it all is the COMMON SENSE of God’s way which is not a belief but fact in every way. There is only one
rule to obey which will cover the purpose of THE SUPREMACY OF GOD and THE RULE OF LAW which will
realize HEAVEN ON EARTH (HOE)

DO ONTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO ONTO YOU

We’ve been on a long road to HOE yet it is nowhere in sight, we have no idea where we started from or where we are,
for past and present are full of lies and only when Truth is prominent will we find our past and plot the direct route to
HOE. The priority is to HOE and the past will reveal itself as lies are eradicated, Truth remains in our minds to mind.

They who stretch for a bright future will propel forward when they release the tight grip they have on the past.

How far we have advanced from the ghastly days when four horsemen tied ropes to four limbs of another
and rode off in opposite directions as fast as they could to keep their beliefs together while pulling another’s
drastically apart while today with all that we have learned we can draw and quarter ourselves.

Let go for Christ’s sake and spring on to HOE and passed, onwards to the next HOE and so on like that.
57
God gave us all brains to think, why not? It’s all good.

When you are running as fast as you can yet going nowhere, get off the treadmill.

A dog trying to catch its tail, soon knows the despair of teaching the average human the futility of going round
in circles and by progressive thinking and a wag of its tail it takes the bone and leaves shit for those who follow.

The Constitution Act, 1982-THE LAW


******************************************************************************************
People have the most magnificent brains capable of anything imaginable good and bad and obviously bad is not
good for society.

It’s quite simple and nobody would argue differently as they slip their hands into your pockets.

The powers that be and the well off have a definite advantage over the rest of us and that’s economics 101.

We are all born to earth the same way but one grows up in a castle and another one on the streets with
completely different views of life.

Those born in the well off families don’t have the slightest idea of what it’s like to live in the ghettoes nor do I
but I do know that the crook from the ghettoes has got a lot more reason to be a crook than one from the well to
do and I do know that the well to do crook fairs better in the courts..

But the Charter states we are all equal under the law and that is the only fair thing the people have going
for them and it is up to you people to see that it happens.

There is a huge difference in every day life when those who can afford to push the limits of the laws get caught,
quite often they are not brought to trial simply because you have complicated the system to a cost we can not
afford.

The system is highly influenced by the wealthy and the laws are set up for the lawyers to feast.
In the wealthy world it is complicated I must presume for we the people have no idea, as you are aware but the
simple world we live in doesn’t need such a complicated system and we sure can’t afford to let justice drag out
which again only benefits the well to do and the immoral.

Obviously if the fine for something is $5000, pocket change to one and a year’s savings to another it is not fair
and the wealthy use this to an advantage.

Obviously they have a lot more brain power to keep them out of trouble and they have a lot of connections.

You know what I mean and I am sure you can elaborate and articulate it much better than I but unfortunately me
is all I got.

I do know when somebody has criminally wronged me.


To the people who deal in big money a loss of $150,000 may not seem like a whole lot but it’s a life savings to
people like me who actually had to earn it from scratch. I will never get it back but it doesn’t have to happen to
others
We can’t take it lightly that the system doesn’t care about us. Individually we are nobody and we don’t have the
58
clout, to make our petty little problems newsworthy so we are ignored.

That is not right or fair and when you people try to pass the buck on to us to deal with the likes of Don Wilson.
that is simply not Constitutional. I have been told how the various departments try to warn people like us about
such people but I am quite sure we are aware there is a high proportion of immoral people out there but our
rights are not to be discriminated against the mentally ill if that is what is being implied.

You people are all organized or I should say all assembled and should have a system that runs smoothly and
deliberately to rid society of immoral inclination and I can attest to the fact that you do not and in fact prove
the system is deliberately set up not to provide for us peasants.

I have provided evidence beyond all doubt that Don Wilson defrauded me in a court room financed by the
provincial government, part of the system set up to administer law and they allow criminal acts to happen right
there in front of the judicator without pressing charges.

That says a whole lot about the system and when I tried to bring this to the attention of all those who should be
concerned, most didn’t even bat an eyelash and I would say they do not have an attitude consistent with the
spirit of the Constitution.

When those who did look into it cited various Acts to support their argument that they didn’t have to help, all
they did is support my argument that they do not have a modus operandi in place to protect the people as
guaranteed by the Charter

That is pathetically obvious as is the difference between a person of wealth and one of us peasants.

It’s one thing to be cognizant of the obvious and another to document the fact and it is well documented.

As one of the police departments or crime stoppers state predictable is preventable I have presented an
abundance of evidence which proves crime is predictable under your present system quite contrary to the
Constitution Act.

We people are not at all familiar with the ins and outs of the system and that is for sound reason that we have
different fields of endeavor and we have good reason to believe and trust that the legal system established to
administer the rule of law is competent to that purpose and we have good reason to trust it to be so.

But when the evidence shows differently it must be fixed and every effort must be made to assure it doesn’t
happen again.

The world is propelled by money but in matters of fairness and everybody equal in matters of law, money can
not have anything to do with it and if there is to be any discretionary provisions the wealthy should be hit and
hit hard because they play a big part in others starving.

They certainly have been well educated, certainly should know better than those who are uneducated with
nothing but hopeless despair who are driven to defend themselves from starvation.

There are always two sides to the story but we see only one side in the law because only one side sets it up.
I have downloaded excerpts from the Attorney General’s web site and it appears that you Michael Bryant are
the person to deal with this matter and I reiterate this is not a personal matter it is a matter between the people
and the government

59
I have initially contacted everyone from the York Regional Police to the Governor General, the army and Canadian
Federation of Taxpayers, the legislature and newspapers but of course such a matter is not something that people want to
get involved in because it simply is detrimental to their careers but by not getting involved they support my allegations.

Anyway it seems you wear many hats and in reality one has to presume you associate with influential people and we
ordinary peasants do not have such an insider type of relation even though our elected representatives are obviously
supposed to represent us and they will admit it quite adamantly but the facts are they don’t.

I will be providing you with the evidence but it is important that we understand what is going on here.

This is not a personal matter. It has to do with the inconsistencies of Ontario laws with the Constitution Act, 1982 which
concerns the legislature, you and the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and I am sure many other Acts, laws, etc.

I have come upon evidence in the course of natural reaction, to find someone who actually represents the people to help
us but have proven there is no one to be found, just words, for the people, comes from their mouths and directions that
take me in circles and a consistent determination to make me deal with the matter myself.

Quite often I have been directed to lawyers but how will they help when they are part of what is wrong with the system.

Well, as I say I downloaded your web site and what is immediately obvious is you are the representative of the people
and the government which seems okay since the government is supposed to be representing the people but it obviously
leaves the door wide open to go awry and awry it is.

With all the powers you have as defined and intertwined shown on pages 9-12, I have determined that you hold a very
influential position with the provincial government

Amongst all your duties on page 11 you will find this statement.

Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province

Ultimately I request that you take this opportunity to make things right for the people.

I started out on one simple mission and it has turned into quite a challenge which is beyond all comprehension.

I am not one to cling onto the past so I do not see how any long dragged out debate defending your position will help
move us into the future where we should have been centuries ago.

There is only one clear simple way to approach this is for you to deal with the concerns I have addressed in the Lawyer
Files 1- 7 and the letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006 which clearly shows that Don Wilson committed fraud
under the criminal code on two accounts over $100,000 and filed a false and misleading information $43,000, an offense
under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 in the courts of the land which government staff have declined to act upon which is
intolerable in a moral society where the system is mandated to deal with the immoral. The cards are all there, deal them
out responsibly and lead us into the belated future.

The people mentioned must be duly punished considering the number of opportunities I have provided them to represent
the people which they would have us believe they do

The government staff must know that along with the trust and power they are given the people must be able to trust them
to use the power for the people which is all the power they have been mandated with.

Your attention must be directed to morality within the government and full speed against immorality by due punishment
when they are caught which is the only way to get to the minds of the people that immorality will not be tolerated here in
Canada. Huge problems first appear as little ones. Take them out and the rest will take care of them selves.

60
The thing with thinking is once you get started it is difficult to stop and if it is was focused for good there is nothing to
stop us from making up the time we have lost and when you think about it sanely things will be sane.

When I make reference to morality I am in no way talking about the bedrooms of the people.

Fair and equality is what the law is all about and if you don’t take care of that, who will?

I request that you deal with all matters within the Lawyer Files #s 1-7

Thank you
Frank Gallagher

PS
This is not about attentiveness to dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s

DO ONTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO ONTO YOU says it all.

Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General


The Attorney General has a unique role to play as a Minister.

One part of the Attorney General's role is that of a Cabinet Minister. In this capacity the Minister is
responsible for representing the interests and perspectives of the Ministry at Cabinet, while simultaneously
representing the interests and perspectives of Cabinet and consequently the Government to the Ministry
and the Ministry's communities of interest.

The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming
from this role are unlike those of any other Cabinet member. The role has been referred to as "judicial-
like" and as the "guardian of the public interest".

Much has been written on the subject of ministerial responsibilities and the unique role of the Attorney
General.

There are various components of the Attorney General's role. The Attorney General has unique
responsibilities to the Crown, the courts, the Legislature and the executive branch of government. While
there are different emphases and nuances attached to these there is a general theme throughout all the
various aspects of the Attorney General's responsibilities that the office has a constitutional and traditional
responsibility beyond that of a political minister.

The statutory responsibilities of the office are found in section 5 of the Ministry of the Attorney General
Act. Section 5 states:

The Attorney General,


(a) is the Law Officer of the Executive Council;
(b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law;
(c) shall superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario;
(d) shall perform the duties and have the powers that belong to the Attorney General and Solicitor General

61
of England by law and usage, so far as those powers and duties are applicable to Ontario, and also shall
perform the duties and powers that, until the Constitution Act, 1867 came into effect, belonged to the
offices of the Attorney General and Solicitor General in the provinces of Canada and Upper Canada and
which, under the provisions of that Act, are within the scope of the powers of the Legislature;
(e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and upon all
matters of law referred to him or her by the Government;
(f) shall advise the Government upon all matters of a legislative nature and superintend all Government
measures of a legislative nature;
(g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law connected with
such ministries and agency;
(h) shall conduct and regulate all litigation for and against the Crown or any ministry or agency of
government in respect of any subject within the authority or jurisdiction of the Legislature;
(i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices;
(j) shall perform such other functions as are assigned to him or her by the Legislature or by the Lieutenant
Governor in Council. "

What follows is an overview of the various components of the Attorney General's roles and
responsibilities, primarily as outlined in the Act.

Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a))


The role of chief law officer might be referred to as the Attorney General's overall responsibility as the
independent legal advisor to the Cabinet - and some have even suggested that the role possibly extends to
the Legislature as well. The importance of the independence of the role is fundamental to the position and
well established in common law, statutes and tradition.
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.

The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained
and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.

In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General's
policy advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet. The Attorney General's legal
advice or constitutional advice should not be lightly disregarded. The Attorney General's policy advice has
the same weight as that of other ministers.

Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d))


One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General's role is the responsibility for criminal
prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section 92 gives the
provinces authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justice and thereby gives
the provincial Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal Code.

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General
and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether or
not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the prosecution
should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.

62
It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry out the
Minister's criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political
pressures. The Attorney General's responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken -
and seen to be undertaken - on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations.
Whether to initiate or stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy. This responsibility
has been characterized as a matter of the Attorney General acting as the Queen's Attorney - not as a
Minister of the government of the day.

This is not to suggest that decisions regarding criminal prosecutions are made in a complete vacuum. A
wide range of policy considerations may be weighed in executing this responsibility, and the Attorney
General may choose to consult the Cabinet on some of these considerations. However any decisions
relating to the conduct of individual prosecutions must be the Attorney General's alone and independent of
the traditional Cabinet decision making process. In practice, in the vast majority of cases, these decisions
are made by the Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys.

An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting criminal
prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which includes not only
the community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a distinct responsibility to
the court to present all the credible evidence available.

The responsibility is to present the case fairly - not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of
criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One of the
Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the public in
understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.

Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature, for
decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the
prosecution is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicae rule
bars any comment on a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub judicae rule
strictly prohibits the Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions that are before the courts. Given
the stature of the Attorney General's position, any public comment coming from the office would be seen
as an attempt to influence the case.

Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individual criminal
cases, such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political interference.
Accordingly, it is traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of the Attorney
General's agents, the Crown Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where the public would
expect the Attorney General to be briefed.

Legislative Responsibilities (s. 5(e) and (f))

The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These
responsibilities have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in
accordance with principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) above). This is obviously an
important and broad area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise on the
constitutionality and legality of legislation.

The Attorney General's legislative responsibilities are played out in a variety roles. The Office of
Legislative Counsel reports to the Attorney General. Legislative Counsel plays a key role in ensuring the
63
legal integrity of Government legislation. Although the Legislative Counsel's reporting relationship to the
Attorney General does allow the Attorney General to provide guidance and set standards, individual pieces
of legislation are drafted on instructions from client ministries and are not within the sole control of
Legislative Counsel or the Attorney General. It should also be noted that Legislative Counsel also has a
direct responsibility to the Legislature as the Office also drafts all private member's bills.

The Attorney General has a further role to play as part of whatever Cabinet Committee is formed to review
legislation and regulations. Here the Minister has an opportunity to comment on the technical issues
related to legislation and regulations prior to Cabinet consideration.

The Attorney General's role on legislative matters is as an adviser to the Cabinet. Although unlikely,
Cabinet could, in theory, receive the Attorney General's legal opinion on legislation and choose to
disregard it. The Attorney General's role is not independent of Cabinet decision making as in the area of
criminal prosecutions. As was noted earlier, the Attorney General must make careful distinctions about the
legal opinions and policy or political preferences being offered about legislation.

Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d))


In addition to the specific responsibilities to conduct civil litigation on behalf of the Government and its
agencies (s. 5(h)), the Attorney General has broader litigation responsibilities flowing from the historical
powers of the Attorney General referred to in s. 5(d) of the Act. These powers are based on the Crown's
parens patriae (parental) authority. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only to conduct
litigation in cases directly affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases where there is a
clear matter of public interest or public rights at stake.

This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is well and
independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter challenges to
legislation, even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionally protected
rights.

Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c))

A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice in the
province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison with
the judiciary.

Given the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, the responsibility for courts
administration is often a very sensitive and delicate issue. Great care and respect for the principles of
judicial independence must be exercised in this area.

As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.

64
65
On several occasions I have requested Bruce Herridge inform me as to what efforts he has made to this
promise with no response.

January 17, 2008

Note the word “threshold” often used by members involved in the legal system.

This is the word which often puts me on the threshold of insanity.

On several occasions I have requested the prominent government members define the meaning in the
context it is used in respect of the evidence I provided of the criminal acts perpetrated by my former
tenant but of course they refuse to respond because it confirms the illegitimate two tiered system which
benefits the members of the upper tier highly detrimental to the moral majority inconsistent with the
Constitution and not conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

66
September 18 2006

To: Senator Lorna Milne To: The Right Honourable Chief


Message
Deputy Chair Justice of Canada
Delivery
Senate Committee Beverly McLachlin,P.C.
failure
Legal and Constitutional Affairs Att’n Nancy Brooks
mailto:milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca Executive Legal Officer
media@scc-cscgc.ca
From: Frank Gallagher
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On

Re: Constitution Act, 1982


The legal system in the Province of Ontario is unconstitutional)

Dear Ms. Nancy Brooks

For a year now I have been trying to get a little justice and just a smidgeon of the guarantee called for in
the Charter.

I started out with a relatively simple matter filing an application with the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal
to have a tenant evicted from my home for two reasons.
He was in arrears $8000.
He had signed an agreement dated May 6 2005 to vacate my premises on May 31 2005
He is the president of a company called BioSafe Natural Technologies, Inc. and I am a major share holder,
second only to the President.

I had given him 6 months free rent commencing February 1 2004 ending July 31 2004 when he agreed to
pay me $800 a month beginning August 1 2004. One thing led to another and eventually I realized this
man was a swindler and I wanted him out of my house.

I filed an application with the ORHT June 6 2005 to evict and attached a copy of an agreement dated May
6/05
The tenant filed a dispute with the ORHT which was completely false and misleading (all lies) and during
the course of the hearing he denied having ever seen the May 6 2005 agreement which he had signed.
I proved that he did sign it and I also proved that his dispute was false and misleading.

The important part about the tenant denying having ever seen the document is that he had used a false
signature for the purpose of denying it.

This document also contained matters concerning the Corporation which made the significance of the
document in the $150,000 range for me and my friends.
The document also protected share holders who had invested prior to me.

He had obviously committed the act of fraud right there in front of the judicator and it is all a matter of
record.
His false and misleading dispute is also fraud.

This is where the trouble begins.

67
I attempted to get the judicator to lay charges for these offences but they declined.
I attempted to get the Investigations and Enforcement unit to lay charges but they declined.
I then corresponded and met with the York Regional Police but they declined.
I met with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police but they declined.
I wrote the Ontario Provincial Police and they declined but informed me that the YRP had jurisdiction.

I wrote my MP, the Prime Minister, the leaders of the other parties, the Attorney General, the Governor
General, the Armed Forces, the Canadian Tax Payer’s Federation, OCAP and other charity organizations,
the Churches and all the GTA major newspapers and some TV stations with no response.

I then created a 266 page document with a cover and back page which includes the correspondence from
the various departments with my commentaries.

The evidence in this document proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the legal system in Ontario is not
consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982 and it is in fact a conspiracy against the people to steal their
money through the taxation system.

Within these writings is correspondence with the Law Society of Upper Canada which proves they have no
interest in justice and their only interest is money.
I had written them regarding a lawyer who terminated a landscaping contract I had in Bolsover.
He terminated it under his client’s instructions stating that I had entered into a contract with his client to
build a dock and a deck with the work to commence June 5 and to be completed June 15 2006.

The lawyer’s termination letter was dated June 16 2006 and he goes on to say that I have not completed the
work and in fact has been barely started. He states that I have not attended the site and have left my
workers unsupervised and in fact some have quit and left the site because of it.

There is not one word of truth in this, so I wrote the lawyer asking by what authority does he terminate my contract
and what allowances are provided to lawyers to write so much crap. I requested that he send me a copy of the
contract he is referring to.

I forwarded a copy to the Law Society of Upper Canada and they responded that they understood the urgency of my
letter but in order to give my concerns the attention they deserve it would take 30 days.
Two months later I get their response which states that they see nothing wrong.

During the waiting period I asked both the lawyer and the Law Society if they would send me a copy of the
purported contract which I never received.

The fact is the contract does not have a completion date and further more the contract says that I am to be paid in full
when Charlotte Silverthorne was satisfied that I had completed the work, identified in the contract, to her
satisfaction.

I have written back to the Law Society of Upper Canada letting them know how disappointed I am with them and I
wait for their response. I do not expect to hear from them any time soon because they have a lot of splainin to do.

Anyway, on September 1 2006 I sent this 266 page document to the Premier of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty and I
have also sent copies to: YRP, RCMP and the Ombudsman.
I forgot to mention the Ombudsman earlier when I was listing who I had corresponded with.

On Friday the 15th I sent a copy to my MP and my MPP.

68
I expect it will be quite a while before I hear from them.

Meanwhile I am sending my information to as many people as I can with hopes that the information gets the
attention it deserves.

It contains serious issues regarding the legal system in Ontario and the inconsistencies with the
Constitution Act.

I know it is a lot to ask of you to sit down and read my 266 pages but as I say it is of a most serious matter and I
believe you are the person to look into this.

So, please find attached the index file and the first 50 pages of the file I sent to the Premier dated September 1 2006.

From this day on it will be referred to as the “BLACK BOOK”

This book is finished and I have opened a new file called the “BLUE BOOK”
It contains my commentaries on the correspondence in the BLACK BOOK and it will contain any and all future
correspondence.

I hope to hear from you shortly

Please let me know if you have received the 3 page index, the cover page and the first 50 pages and let me know if
you want me to send the rest.

Thank you,
Frank Gallagher

Thank you for your interest in the Department of Justice Canada.

This confirms receipt of the message which you recently sent. If further action is
required or has been requested, we will respond as quickly as possible. Please note
that because we experience a high volume of correspondence, answers to complex and
multiple questions will take more time.

This is an acknowledgement of receipt of your correspondence and no reply is


necessary at this time.

Web Administrator
Department of Justice
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
webadmin@justice.gc.ca <mailto:webadmin@justice.gc.ca> www.canada.justice.gc.ca 1-
800-O-Canada (1-800-622-6232) TTY/TDD 1-800-465-7735

69
Brooks Nancy [BrooksN@scc-csc.gc.ca]; on behalf of; media [media@scc-csc.gc.ca]

Tuesday 9:49 AM Sept. 9,2006

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

The Supreme Court of Canada cannot give legal advice nor answer the numerous requests for legal information that
we receive from Canada and abroad. We cannot respond to comments on the decisions of the Court or the legal
system. Nor can we provide suggestions on how you may wish to manage your landlord-tenant dispute and related
matters.

Yours truly,

Nancy Brooks
Executive Legal Officer / Adjointe exécutive juridique
Chambers of the Chief Justice of Canada / Cabinet de la Juge en chef du Canada
Supreme Court of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada
301 Wellington Street / 301 rue Wellington
Ottawa K1A 0J1
mailto:brooksn@scc-csc.gc.ca
Tel./Tél.: 613-996-9296 | Fax/Téléc.: 613-952-3092

This e-mail message may contain privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée et confidentielle. Il est interdit de l'utiliser ou de la divulguer sans autorisation.

-----Original Message-----
From: frank Gallagher [mailto:franklyone@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:45 PM
To: media
Subject: Constitution Act

September 20 2006

Dear Ms. Brooks

I thank you for your quick response.

But I am not looking for suggestions regarding my personal concerns with Don Wilson. I have referred to my
personal situation to illustrate that the people’s Rights and Freedoms are not being protected as guaranteed by the
Constitution. This is proven in the 266 pages of the BLACK BOOK which I referred to and sent you the first 50
pages.

My mission now is to find the proper authority to report to. It certainly is an important CONSTITUTION issue. Am I to
record you as not being concerned with the protection of the people’s rights as guaranteed by the Charter? I am
concerned and I am demonstrating that by doing more than just stating the words. I would like to mention that I have
put thousands of hours into this of my own time. Surely someone paid by the taxpayers should feel a little more
concerned for them.

I would appreciate your attention to this matter and if the protection of the people’s rights and freedoms is a concern
of yours I request that you demonstrate that by directing this matter to the proper authority and if there is no such
authority please state so. The people should know that the guarantee of the Charter is just words and that there is
no guarantee leaving them victims of one of the biggest scams ever beset on mankind.

If you are concerned please look at the attached file containing correspondence of the Law Society of Upper Canada
which proves beyond any doubt that they don’t give a damn about the people of Canada.

70
You are obviously in a better position than I to see whatever needs to be done is done. To just say pick a number
from 1 -10,000 and say nope sorry not me and hang up is not exactly illustrating the concern for the people who pay
your wages and the others who are responsible for our welfare. I admit that we people are forced to pay our taxes by
the authority of the Constitution and perhaps would not do our part so trustingly if not for the efficiency of the tax
system and our protection as per the guarantee should be as efficient. You should be obligated to do whatever is
within your capabilities to this endeavor and I would think that this is a priority one.

Although this is a lot of reading and the tendency would be to speed read I suggest that your response indicates that
you did not grasp the serious nature of my writings and if you did it further proves that we people are being ripped off
with nobody to watch over our interests.

Please deal with this matter with the seriousness it deserves.

Please find the portion of the BLUE BOOK dealing with the Law Society of Upper Canada attached if you should find
the time.

Thank you

Yours sincerely,

Frank Gallagher

71
September 25 2006

To: WHOM IT DOES CONCERN


To: To: Senators (Ontario)
The Government of Canada etal
The Government of the Province of Ontario etal PM Art Eggleton
ATTY. GEN John Trevor Eyton
Premier of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, MPP Hugh Segal
The Honourable John Gerretsen MP Marie –P Poulin
YRP P. Michael Pitfield
From: Frank Gallagher RCMP Jeramiel S Graftstein
34 Riverglen Drive Anne C.Cools
Keswick, Ontario
L4P 2P8
Norman K. Atkins
franklyone@hotmail.com Peter A. Stollery
David P. Smith
Re: Charter Rights Frank W. Mahovlich
Marjory Le Breton
Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal
Order under section 69
Colin Kenny
Tenant Protection Act,1997 Mac Harb
File Number TNL-67103

Dear WHOM

This is to inform you that the people’s rights and freedoms under the Constitution Act, 1982 as provided in, Schedule B, Part 1,
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms are not being protected as guaranteed by the Charter.

I filed an application to evict a tenant from my basement apartment on June 06 2005 with the ORHT because he was in arrears
$8000 and he had refused to vacate my premises as he agreed to on May 31 2005.
I attached a copy of the agreement dated May 6 2005 to the application which supports my application.

On June 10 2005 Don Wilson my tenant filed a dispute with the ORHT which I proved to be a false and misleading
information.

During the course of the hearing on the first day June 30 2005 Don Wilson (tenant) committed two acts of fraud.(Actually 3
acts of fraud –dispute and the two agreements)

Don Wilson was shown copies of the May 6 2005 agreement which I had filed and attached to the application and a copy of the
April 13 2005 agreement which was a superseded version of the May 6 2005 which I presented to the Tribunal.

He denied having ever seen them or signing them or initialing them. I provided a witness Dave Kirby
( witness to the April 13 2005 agreement) who identified Don Wilson as the person who signed the April 13 2005 agreement.

Don Wilson had signed both of these agreements with a false signature making it obvious that he was a fraud.

During the course of the hearing I said to Nancy Fahlgren (Judicator) “There ought to be a law.”
She said “There is” and when on to say that she could file with Investigations and Enforcement

I received the Order under section 69, Tenant Protection Act,1997, File Number TNL-67103 dated August 8 2005 in the mail
which found for me.

This order proves that the court concurred with the 2 agreements May 6 2005 and the April 13 2005 agreements even though
Don Wilson had denied ever seeing them and had signed them with a false signature. By doing so the order proved that the
dispute filed by Don Wilson was false and misleading information.

The order made no mention of the fraud so I began my trek in search of my guarantee under the Charter.
I wanted Don Wilson charged for fraud.

72
I began my trek for Justice on or about August 10 2005 beginning with the ORHT and then the Investigations and Enforcement
Unit, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and when they declined to act I took all my files to the York Regional Police
and we had a couple of meetings and much correspondence but they declined to act. I then took the matter to the RCMP and
after much correspondence they declined to act. The OPP declined to act stating the YRP had jurisdiction.

I wrote my MP Peter Van Loan on at least two separate occasions and he declined to respond.
I wrote the Governor General, Attorney General (Federal and Provincial), Armed forces, Canadian Taxpayers Federation
(Federal, Provincial and others) and the list goes on.
They all declined to respond

I wrote the Ombudsman and they declined to act

I wrote my MPP, Julia Munro but no response.


I wrote again to MPP, Julia Munroe who respond but declined to act( I should take care of it myself.)
I put a file together which I now refer to as the BLACK BOOK dated September 1 2006 and faxed it to the Premier of Ontario,
Dalton McGuinty, but he has not responded.
I sent a portion of the BLACK BOOK to Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Honourable John Gerretsen but he has
not responded. I sent full copies of the BLACK BOOK to the YRP, RCMP, Ombudsman and MPP but they have not
responded. MP phone call from his office. She will give it to him

The BLACK BOOK consists of a cover page, 3 index pages, 266 pages and a back cover page.
I have opened a new file which I refer to as the BLUE BOOK

On September 18 2006 I sent the cover page of the BLACK BOOK and the first 50 pages

To: Senator Lorna Milne To: The Right Honourable Chief To:The Minister of Justice
and
Deputy Chair Justice of Canada the Attorney General of
Senate Committee Beverly McLachlin,P.C. Canada
Legal and Constitutional Affairs Att’n Nancy Brooks The Honourable
mailto:milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca Executive Legal Officer Vic Toews
media@scc-csc.gc.ca webadmin@justice.gc.ca

Senator Lorna Milne e-mail message came back not delivered.


Nancy Brooks responded September 19 2006 missed the point-declined to act
Sept 20 06 To: Nancy Brook – I tried again- No response.
No response from the Honourable Vic Toews.

I am now forwarding an excerpt from the BLUE BOOK (see attachment) to the recipients of the BLACK BOOK requesting
an immediate response I will then begin addressing other departments.

The attachment (Commentary highlighted in blue) (I draw your attention to- highlighted in yellow) Pages

Correspondence with the Ombudsman 1-6, 10,11


Excerpts from the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 7-9, 15-24
Copy of Tribunal Order File Number TNL-67103 12-14
Commentary FRAUD 25-.38
Don Wilson dispute (false misleading information) 39, 40
Purchase agreement BioSafe February 4 2004 41-43
Transfer slip from my account to Don Wilson $30,000 BioSafe Cheque to Don Wilson $10,000 44-45
May 6 2005 agreement was attached to application to evict (Don Wilson denied seeing or signing) FRAUD 46-49
Rod Bradbury EcoSafe Owner-President Never was Vice-President of BioSafe - correspondence FRAUD 50-55

I have much more evidence that proves Don Wilson is a FRAUD

I have informed them all but nobody cares.

73
As requested above I would appreciate an immediate response as to your receiving and will you review.
In the meantime I shall continue my search for the infamous guarantee.

Sincerely
Frank Gallagher

To:Michael.Thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; mona.eichman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Cc: citytvhosts@citytv.com; city@thestar.ca; citydesk@tor.sunpub.com; comail@lsuc.on.ca;


dmaclean@taxpayer.com; ed_hird@telus.net; editor@rd.ca; franklyone@hotmail.com; jwilliamson@taxpayer.com;
letters@globeandmail.ca; 'media'; sylviagerl@ndp.ca; shennig@taxpayer.com; sue-ann.levy@tor.sunpub.com;
tkeirddin@taxpayers.com; Vanloan.P@parl.gc.ca; Vanlop1@parl.gc.ca; webadmin@justice.gc.ca

September 29, 2006 sent e-mails 7.43 AM to replace page 1 sent 5:35 AM Dates were corrected 2006 to 2005

To: Michael Thomson Fax to: Premier Dalton McGuinty, Tim Arkell, Ombudsman, Julia Munro, MPP,
RCMP Peter Van Loan, MP Bruce Herridge, York Regional Police
brooksn@scc-csc.gc.ca
From: Frank Gallagher
franklyone@hotmail.com

Dear Michael Thomson

As you are aware I am a Canadian citizen who became victim to a scam.


This scam was identified at a Tribunal hearing of the ORHT on June 30 2005 where I had attached a copy of a May
6 2005 agreement to my application to evict my tenant Don Wilson for refusing to pay rent and for not vacating my
premises on May 31 2005 as per the May 6 2005 agreement which both he and I had signed and my mother had
witnessed.

On June 10 2005 Don Wilson had signed and filed a Dispute with the ORHT which was a humungous fabrication
which was an obvious contradiction of that which was contained in the May 6 2005 agreement
which he had signed.
During the course of the hearing Don Wilson denied having ever seen the May 6 2005 agreement and of course
denied having signed it or initialed it. I then produced another agreement dated April 13 2005 which Don Wilson and
I had signed and a friend of mine had witnessed. I showed it to Don and he denied ever seeing it and also denied
ever signing it.
I then introduced Dave Kirby to the Judicator as being the witness and he identified Don as the person who signed it.
Both of these agreements confirmed that Don owed me the rent money and both confirmed that he had given me
notice to vacate my premises on May 31 2005 quite contrary to the Dispute he had signed and filed with the Tribunal
stating that he was paid up until February 2009 as per special arrangements made in stock negotiations..
The agreements dealt with other matters regarding Don Wilson’s incorporated business BioSafe which I am a major
share holder. The value of the document on paper to me and my friends is about $150,000 but it also protected the
investors who had come before me increasing the value on paper to around $300,000. Probably about 20 investors
in all.
The reason I had him sign them in the first place is because he had given cause for me to distrust him.

The Tribunal was adjourned to July 28 2005 for the Tribunal’s decision and I should make note that Nancy Fahlgren
(Judicator) announced at the beginning of the hearing that it was not being recorded.
th
I do have a copy of the June 30 as you know as I provided you a copy.

On August 10 2005 I received the Tribunal Order under Section 69, Tenant Protection Act, 1997 File Number TNL-
67103 dated August 8 2005 which found for me and Don Wilson was ordered to pay me the arrears and vacate my
premises.

I had asked Nancy Fahlgren on June 30th at the hearing if she would be charging Don Wilson with fraud and in fact I
had said “There should be a law” when it was revealed that Don was a fraud, and Nancy said “There is and she

74
could forward it onto the Investigations and Enforcement Unit”. I should note that this part of the hearing is not on the
recording of the hearing so it was either erased or Nancy turned off the recorder.

The Tribunal Order never indicated that Don Wilson had been charged for fraud which initiated my search for justice
which I have not found to date.( over a year now)

What I have found is that which I am sure the public have been aware of but just unable to prove.

The administrators of the Constitution Act, 1982 have used their authority mandated by the Act for their own
benefit disregarding the Charter rights of the people.

January 17, 2008

To this date I have not found the justice guaranteed and necessary for the support of the Charter
guarantee to the individual but have irrefutably proven justice is not obtainable through the present legal
system in control of the government conspirators of Organized Crime against the moral majority who
have taken advantage of their trust to ransack them in every possible way without causing them to rise in
revolt against them.

The old democracy they operated under is history well documented superseded by the Constitution Act,
1982 well documented which contains the Federal Government guarantee to every individual which they
have refused to accept responsibility for, well documented which will immediately fade them into the
annals of the infamous of history as the moral majority unite with the Charter Democracy Force to
bring them before the people to account for their actions of conspiracy against the moral majority and the
Constitution itself which is a treasonable offence where the moral majority will seek out the maximum
punishment as provided by law to those who persist loyal to the conspiracy.

At this moment I await a response to my e-mail of January 11 2008 from Pierre Leduc, Insp. RCMP - GRC
Executive Assistant to the Commissioner which will either irrefutably prove the involvement of the RCMP
Commissioner with the conspiracy or signal the end of the government conspiracy of Organized Crime as he
realizes his appointment as Deputy Minister is illegitimate inconsistent with the Constitution not conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as are all laws enacted, administered and enforced by the
conspirators of the Organized Crime perpetrated against the moral majority in absolute defiance of the
law.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

75
January 11 2008

Frank Gallagher
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On
L4P 2P8
franklyone@hotmail.com

Pierre Leduc, Insp.


RCMP - GRC
Executive Assistant to the Commissioner /
Adjoint exécutif du commissaire
Office: (613) 993-0882
Cell: (613) 552-1884
Fax: (613) 993-0309
e-mail: pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: File 2007-1355445


Purpose to investigate complaints of 2 members http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
of the RCMP refusing to investigate Government corruption and conspiracy filed with the
Commission
for Public Complaints Against the RCMP: Files PC-2007-2316 and PC-2007-2316

Dear Pierre Leduc

This is a follow up of your recent e-mail to me January 7 2008 which you were addressing my January 2
2008 to the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot. (Copy enclosed See page 6)

It seems the further we get into this the further we get away from it, with the investigation needing an
investigation with more things to look into to determine the truth.

That is what this is all about is it not? To determine the truth, Right? At least that is my objective.

Of course that is not what the evidence on my web sites of the government indicates as the complaint
suggests.
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

Since I filed the complaint on November 8 2007 with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the
RCMP the correspondence with them and the RCMP Commissioner’s office is quite discerning being
indicative of what the evidence on the web sites show.

As the Guardians site will continue to add the evidence as it comes including this document which should
be easy enough to follow for a competent, responsible, irreproachable RCMP investigator with fortitude
and conviction to purpose which in this case is a matter of the government Organized Crime of corruption
and conspiracy against the people where the evidence irrefutably shows the government departments,
agencies whatever do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which is the
responsibility of the Federal Government to back the guarantee since they made it in the 1982 enactment of
the Constitution.

76
The purpose of this exercise is to make them give a damn and restructure the system to be consistent with
the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as is their obligation as per the
Charter and common law in the matter of putting your money where your mouth is as per the guarantee
they made and refuse to back.
This of course is a very serious issue which requires a very sane serious responsible competent
irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction who comprehends the seriousness of the situation,
understands the properties of a guarantee and the spirit intended under the supreme law of Canada which
recognizes the supremacy of God.

The 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document published at the top of web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
is indicative of the way the whole government system works which has been irrefutably proven by the
documents on my web site and would be recognized as such by a person with the necessary traits described
above.

The fact the RCMP have been apprized of the evidence since January 2006 which I have been providing
by e-mail using the Michael.Thomson@rcmp-rc.gc.ca address and Sgt. Roy Steinebach confirmed on October 18
2007 that the RCMP have been receiving it and have been keeping it on file is very disconcerting that they have not
acted upon it and of course is why I filed the complaint.

The fact that the evidence is so clear of the government Organized Crime, corruption and conspiracy it proves one
of two things or both and I highly suspect a combination of both.

The upper echelon is in on the conspiracy because it could not be happening without their cooperation and the rest
of the unit is not competent enough to recognize it or deal with it.

There is the natural course of things where they are all taught to follow the flow routinely with their knowledge of the
law gained through hand me down experience and legal information originating from the Office of the Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada and in Ontario focus is on being alert to Ontario Law.

Therein lays the problem because the Ontario laws are not consistent with the Constitution nor conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which they must be according to the Constitution.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

The point is the correspondence published on my web site which I have received since I filed my
complaint on November 8 2007 with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP,
irrefutably proves the incompetence and or loyalty to the conspiracy by both the Commission for
Complaints and the Office of the RCMP Commissioner who is ultimately responsible for the actions of the
RCMP.

Whether or not it is just incompetence which I shouldn’t say just, because it is a most serious factor that
has allowed the success of the Organized Crime.

The evidence continues to dig the RCMP deeper into the conspiracy and due the very serious nature of the
issues which requires a very sane serious responsible competent irreproachable person of fortitude and
conviction who comprehends the seriousness of the situation, the properties of a guarantee and the spirit
intended under the supreme law of Canada which recognizes the supremacy of God I demand you put a
person of those traits on the case full time which it requires.

77
2 months have passed since the complaint was filed and I get an update report from S/Sgt. Bob MacAdam
not representative of the facts as indicated on copy (page 7) You will see the facts of the telephone
conversation in my notes of the conversation dated December 21 2007 (page 5) (Please respond)
I can not comprehend the manner in which the RCMP are dealing with this very serious matter regarding
the government Organized Crime, corruption and conspiracy which concerns the foundation of the
Constitution of Canada and the wellbeing and safety of the moral majority of the Canadian people.

The RCMP Commissioner has been provided the opportunity to demonstrate the competence of the RCMP
under his command to uphold the law of the land conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
and I now provide you this evidence which demonstrates anything but concern for the law of the land and
the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights indicative of the entire government where their M.O. is
consistent with the M.O. of the Law Society of Upper Canada demonstrated quite effectively in the
document published on my web site “Law Society of Upper Canada Part 1 Part 2”

They are quite adamant their members needn’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights and state their members are not required to assess the validity of a client’s unfounded complaint
before commencing proceedings against his clients adversary causing undue hardship on this individual.

They also state they are not required to look at the evidence in support of my complaint which is absolutely
insane and unfortunately that is just “How it is” in this democracy of Canada where justice is impossible
for the moral majority obviously due to the Government Organized Crime set up well organized against
them.

When I say organized I mean the entire personnel of the Government are loyal to the conspiracy with the
majority perhaps not even aware of it as they just follow routine as they have come to know and presume
the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is legit and who would know the law better than he
and his Office staff.

But damn it, the evidence irrefutably shows he is not the person he is expected to be and refuses to back
the Charter guarantee to every individual as is his responsibility and everyone employed in the legal
system.

He is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada with precisely the same “Mightier than thou and
the law…don’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights attitude”

This is painfully obvious as the prodigious amount of evidence on my web site irrefutably proves including
the cooperation of the RCMP.

The manner in which this complaint is being handled by both the Office of the Commission for Public
Complaints Against the RCMP and the Office of the RCMP Commissioner was predictable because it is
consistent with the entire operation of the government Organized Crime.

You must understand this exercise was initiated only to provide the last length of rope for you all to hang
yourselves with and I am not the least bit surprised you are not cognizant of it for you feel you have all the
loose ends tied up without a court in the land who would convict you without convicting themselves and
blowing the whole conspiracy wide open.

I realize you have control of the media but not the web site as I continue to get many hits every day.

78
The word is spreading to the people where it needs to be and there is no trial required as surely you must
know because it is being held publicly here and now providing you people all the irrefutable evidence and
your actions and responses are far more convincing than anything you may swear under oath with your left
hand on the Bible which means absolutely nothing to you people who do not give a damn about the
Constitution which recognizes the supremacy of God whose aspirations are to the well being of every
individual all being God’s children. Right?
For the record you are being offered the opportunity to distance your self from the conspiracy and given
the extraordinary seriousness of the situation concerning the wellbeing and safety of the moral majority
which are under siege at this moment it is incomprehensible that priority isn’t number one to this endeavor.

There is no middle ground; you are either clearly with the conspiracy or clearly with the law and the moral
majority where clear and decisive action is the only valid response.

This is the fairest trial ever held in Canada, or the world for that matter because you get to decide your
innocence or guilt and we the people will decide your fate.

We follow the “MODEL” set out for us by Confucius


“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”
Who are we?

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

This document will be found on http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-


rights-and-freedoms as usual with all the rest and of course e-mailed to my usual list which now includes
you.
We await your decision. For or against!!
The Charter Democracy Force is assembling the evidence in quick study form to efficiently and effectively
carry on business free of charge in service of the people being the people for the people

Yes really, quite a novel idea. Eh!

79
Memo

Friday December 21, 2007

Bob MacAdam of the RCMP Newmarket called around 2 PM and talked for about 15 minutes.

He has been on the case for 3 weeks but clarified not all the time as he has lots of other cases.
I mentioned that I was expecting the RCMP Commissioner’s 30 day status report which was due around
December 16 2007 but he didn’t know anything about that.

Bob said he is not investigating the conspiracy just the complaint.


“What’s to investigate?” I asked, “Did you talk to Sgt Steinebach…
He’s going to tell you I brought documents down to him about 7” thick evidencing government corruption
and conspiracy and he refused to take the documents and refused to investigate.”

“I had been e-mailing Michael Thomson the evidence but he wouldn’t respond.
Then I noticed on the RCMP web site that they wouldn’t accept documents by e-mail so I printed out the
files and took them down to the RCMP at Newmarket and eventually Sgt Steinebach met with me.”

After talking for about ½ an hour I asked the Sgt. if he knew me and he said yes, that the e-mail documents
I had been sending have been put into a file but they wouldn’t be investigating.

Just before my mother and I left I asked clearly and specifically if he was going to take the documents and
he said no he had them all on file but they won’t be investigating.

That’s my complaint. The RCMP won’t investigate and if he asks Sgt. Steinebach he will tell him the same
thing.
So what’s to investigate about the complaint?

He asked if I could drop down maybe next Friday to discuss the matter which I agreed to at first until I
asked if he had checked the evidence on the web site when he said no.
I asked why not? The instructions clearly stated the evidence was on the web site.

I want the government investigated and the evidence is irrefutable of the government conspiracy.
He mentioned again he was not investing the conspiracy just the complaint.

I told him to investigate the complaint he would have to study the evidence to see if it was a valid
complaint.
Is it trivia, frivolous or vexatious?

There is no need for me to drive down to Newmarket and he said okay but he may call me back.

80
I have sent 18 e-mails to the RCMP Commissioner since December 16 2007 when I
From: Pierre Leduc expected the status report and a number of them made mention of the due date so I wonder
why the 2008.01.02 was the one forwarded to you. This document is particularly germane
Date: 1/7/2008 3:45:04 PM Commission RCMP Complaints Dec. 27 2007.doc
To: frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca
Cc: Diane Fauvelle An example of the incompetence that runs rampant On December 21 2007 during
Subject: Fwd: Correction throughout which allows the success of the government
Organized Crime. a conversation with S/Sgt.
It of course looks like the Complaints Commission is Bob MacAdam I told him the
Good afternoon Mr. Gallagher, involved as well as the RCMP status report was due on
Commissioner
December 16 2007 already
Just to let you know that your correspondence dated 2008.01.02 was late and he had not even
forwarded to me. I spoke with Sergeant Costa Dimopoulos this afternoon. looked at the evidence on my
He advised me that an update had been prepared and had been forwarded to web site yet.
you recently.
Pierre Leduc
Please look into all these issues to clarify these contentious issues Even if 45 days from
Sincerely, I find it inane that a predetermined update stating nothing except the November 16 2007 45 days
investigation is continuing despite the attempt to make it appear I am
uncooperative incomprehensible that it can’t be sent on time. More would be December 31 2007
Pierre Leduc, Insp. incomprehensible is that which all the evidence continues to prove. but didn’t get written until
RCMP - GRC January 7 2008 the day you
Executive Assistant to the Commissioner / Adjoint exécutif du state it was already sent which
commissaire This is a very serious matter being dealt with of course is not true as Bob
Office: (613) 993-0882 routinely in the incompetent manner I am familiar told me on the 8th he still had
Cell: (613) 552-1884 with of government personnel having spent 10 it and was going to be mailed
Fax: (613) 993-0309 years with the province and 14 with City Toronto that day.
e-mail: pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca Please respond clarifying

Tuesday January 8 2008

The update was not in the mail today so I phoned Sergeant Costa Dimopoulos and left a message to call me.
S/Sgt R.B MacAdam returned the call and I asked him when the status report was sent.
He said it’s already and it’s going out today.
I said Pierre Leduc had informed me on Monday the 7th by e-mail that the update had recently been sent.

He also mentioned it really doesn’t say much, basically that the investigation is on going.
He mentioned again that this is not the only case he is doing and he is not working on it all the time.
He did say he was looking at the evidence on my web site and it will take him 6 months to go through it.
He was having some difficulty zeroing in on what the main complaint is.

At first I suggested if he just looked at the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document he would know something is
wrong with the legal system with their members running it.

Then I suggested he start at the beginning and once he knew the crimes by Don Wilson my former tenant were
committed right during the ORHT hearing and not dealt with it the rest will fall into place.
I mentioned the filing false and misleading information an offense under s. 206(2) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997
and when he reads the document to the Toronto Sun he will know the crimes were committed including the fraud for
over $100,000.
Why wouldn’t the ORHT at least deal with the Tenant Protection Act offense?
It’s all a cover up of the fact the Ontario laws are not constitutional. That’s why the cover up.

I also suggested he look at the “Mad Glad mostly Sad Why?” document and he remembered passing by it.
In fact that is the place to start.

Anyway Bob seemed like he was getting the idea and said that what he needed was some help and did I mind if he
called again to be helped through it which I was only too pleased and I would gladly meet with him if he wanted to
81
discuss the evidence of the government conspiracy.
Received January 11 2008

I do not like that statement, “despite the fact I did not


wish to meet “ the investigation is continuing.
That infers I am not cooperating with the investigation.
Talk about turning things 180 degrees around.

2 ½ years I have been trying to get a government person


to cooperate and the same with RCMP as I was looking
for the delinquent status report.
I was of the opinion it was due about December 16 2007.
His reference to a 45 day interim report contradicts the
November 8 2007 from the Complaints Commission
where I accepted the November 16 2007 letter from the
RCMP as the letter of acknowledgement of receipt of
complaint due in 45 days. Which is correct?
Please respond clarifying.
82
The following e-mail addresses will be sent a copy of this document today January 17, 2008 which will be published
on the web site of the Charter Democracy Force under

which waits for the historical decision of Pierre Leduc Insp.RCMP – GRC Executive Assistant to the
Commissioner and the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot who has also been provided a copy of this document.

The Armed Forces have been provided the evidence of the government conspiracy and await along with the rest of
us to see if the RCMP Commissioner will act responsibly in support of the Constitution and the people as demanded
either stated or implied by the Charter guarantee to every individual of the moral majority bringing the identified
members of the immoral minority before the courts and justice of the people where punishment is demanded and
priority number one attentive to deterrence which is fundamental to the individual’s guaranteed protection as
provided by the Charter.

Cover letter

January 17, 2008

Urgent !!
Attention RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and Pierre Leduc Insp.RCMP – GRC Executive Assistant to the
Commissioner

See attachment

Immediate acknowledgement of receipt required.

Immediate response to the January 11 2008 e-mail sent to Pierre Leduc Insp.RCMP – GRC Executive
Assistant to the Commissioner required from both the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and Pierre Leduc
Insp.RCMP – GRC Executive Assistant to the Commissioner

Frank Gallagher

83
pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; attorneygeneral@jus.gov.on.ca;
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
Primetimecrime@gmail.com; webadmin@greenparty.ca;
info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org; edmonton@cba-alberta.org; cba@bccba.org; admin@cbanb.com;
cba-nl@nl.rogers.com; cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca; cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-
pei@isn.net; cba.sk@sasktel.net; cbayukon@internorth.com
ciec-ccie@parl.gc.ca;
ndpaoatlantic@ns.aliantzinc.ca; information@forces.gc.ca; ndpao-pacific@shaw.ca; ndpaocal@nucleus.com;
NDPAO@bellnet.ca; ndpao.mtl@videotron.ca; webmaster@forces.gc.ca;
AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca;
ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca; ascentive_newsletter@noreply.ascentive.com; ayala_disadvantage@hotmail.com;
admin@otla.com; atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca; anguswd@sen.parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca;
bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;
bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca; bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org; bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org; bergeron_hater_1976@hotmail.com;
buoyantly.ewing_1977@hotmail.com; BelleG@parl.gc.ca; bill@wgilmour.ca; complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca;
clgascon@fja.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; communications@ps.gc.ca; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
christine.elliott@pc.ola.org; city@thestar.ca; citydesk@tor.sunpub.com; comail@lsuc.ca; cgrech@yrng.com;
copelandj@scc-csc.gc.ca;
cdavis@relevantknowledge.com; Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca; charrf@sen.parl.gc.ca; coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca;
cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca; chapum@sen.parl.gc.ca; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca;
carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca; campbel@sen.parl.gc.ca; callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca
Day.S@parl.gc.ca; dwatch@web.net; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;
dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca; debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dinovoc-qp@ndp.on.ca; dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca; dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com;
dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca; damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca;
egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca; editor@tor.sunpub.com; ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org; elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;
dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com; dkristie558@toonear.info;
dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca; damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; editor@tor.sunpub.com; editor@rd.ca;; francois-giroux@cas-
satj.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca; fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca; frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca; fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca; fountain.threapers1960@hotmail.com;
Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca
gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;
goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca; grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca; gore.outsnoring_@hotmail.com;
Hill.J@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;
hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca; horton@adlib.ca; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; info@chfc.ca;
info@olderwomensnetwork.org; info@ocsj.ca; info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca; info@ohrc.on.ca; info@libertarian.ca;
justice@socialjustice.org; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca;

84
jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; julia.munroco@pc.ola.org; jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca;
jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca; johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;
jorgensen.unresisting_@hotmail.com; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca;Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca; kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca;
lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;
lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca; lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca; lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;
licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; Lussier.M@parl.gc.ca; Lake.M@parl.gc.ca; Laforest.J@parl.gc.ca;
mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org; machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca; massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca; meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca; mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca; merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca; mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca; munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca; mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca; McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;
nimhinfo@nih.gov; nejmcust@mms.org; prevention@ps.gc.ca; communications@ps.gc.ca;
mcknight.pycnodont@hotmail.com; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca; mphelps@otla.com; Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca;
nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca; ocap@tao.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;
Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca; pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca; pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca; prevention@ps.gc.ca; prognosticatingw371@mobilemessage.com; pwang@adni.net;
PoiliP@parl.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca; russem@sen.parl.gc.ca;
rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca; rattel@sen.parl.gc.ca; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;
spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca;
smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca; smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca; sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca; spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;
stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca; szwebmaster@yahoo.com;
support@besthotfilms.com; Symantec@reply.digitalriver.com; Sweet.D@parl.gc.ca;
terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca;
tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca; tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca; victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca;
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; vanlop1@parl.gc.ca; vanlop0@parl.gc.ca; webadmin@justice.gc.ca;
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; web@ps.gc.ca;
Williams.J@parl.gc.ca; Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca;
philreporter1989@yahoo.ca
editor@philreporter.com; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; info@vivelecanada.ca; nphlstatistician@hotmail.com.com;
press@transparency.org;
ti-can@transparency.ca; askgov@worldbank.org, sprayriver@yahoo.ca; newsroom@globeandmail.com;
news@citynews.ca; newsdesk@metronews.ca; share@interlog.com; admin@georginaadvocate.com;
admin@stouffvillesun.com

85
January 28, 2008

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Your File 2007-1355445


Interim Report of January 23 2008
Government Organized Crime
Corruption and Conspiracy

Dear Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam

This is to inform you I am in receipt of your 30 day interim report of January 23 2008 (copy page 5) and I
am quite appreciative it is more informative and only 16 days since your last report.

I am of the presumption this was induced by your superiors Insp. Pierre Leduc and RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot avoiding the issues but reacting to documents Pierre Leduc,Insp January 11 2008.doc, and
Responsible for your destiny Jan. 20 2008.doc listed below which you will find on my web site Charter
Democracy Force http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

Lawyer File 14.doc


This column was published in the North Shore News on September 13 2000
Stockwell Day November 3.doc
Stockwell Day November 5 07.doc
Commission RCMP Complaints Dec. 27 2007.doc
Stockwell Day January 3 2008.doc
RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Fax RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Pierre Leduc,Insp January 11 2008.doc
Responsible for your destiny Jan. 20 2008.doc

86
I created this site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force following our telephone
conversation of January 8 2008 in an effort to simplify the analysis of the information published on my
other 9 web sites which are listed on the said web site.

This was done to keep a semblance to order so you and all the government personnel could be kept up to
speed and even more important so the public can easily read the facts pertinent to the Government
Organized Crime of corruption and Conspiracy against them.

Your letter of January 23 2008 makes no mention of the Charter Democracy Force web site so I presume
you have not been forwarded the information indicating a break down in communications being quite
disconcerting due the humongous serious nature of the issues.

Telephone conversations are subject to misinterpretations and summaries misleading being of limited
value in analyzing the evidence in search of the truth.

I am aware you have policies and routines to follow being under the thumbs of your superiors but given the
nature of the issues where the RCMP upper echelon are highly implicated to the government conspiracy
having authority over you to orchestrate this investigation I make every effort to eliminate ambiguity by
document, publishing it on the web site expecting responses coherent to the issues and context which are
addressed which have been wanting.

As you are aware all correspondence with government personnel is being published on my web site in a
format far superior to a PUBLIC INQUIRY because it is being documented in real time with the
government personnel being provided the evidence as it happens with every opportunity to react in a
manner consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

The public gets a bird’s eye view of the government personnel in action demonstrating their every which
way but competent responsible irreproachable approach FFF with fortitude and conviction to the support
of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

It is to this endeavor I request your e-mail address so that I can be assured the information I need you to
have is getting to you so you can perform your duty competently and the public will have the evidence that
you did so addressing the issues presented you.

You are aware of the RCMP members who had the courage to come forward about the RCMP Pension
Fund scandal and during the hearing of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts when the DOJ was
linked the Standing Committee was ordered to sit on it while Honorable Stockwell Day Minister of Public
Safety determined a Task Force was the best way to divert attention from the DOJ and mission was
temporarily accomplished but not done with, which the Charter Democracy Force can assure you.

The harassment days of the RCMP upper echelon against the members of the people’s RCMP are over as I
can assure you it will be nipped in the bud if you put all the facts in your correspondence to me.

87
Due to circumstance with the RCMP upper echelon highly suspected of interfering with the RCMP in
performance of their duty to enforce the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights if you were to be more informative in your correspondence as to the circumstance which has
initiated your letter expedience to the resolve will be FFF (Forthright, Forthcoming and Forthwith).

If you were directed by a superior your letter should clearly state so which is significant to this Charter
Democracy Force “PUBLIC INQUIRY”

The truth is what we seek in efficient and effective manner where expedience is vital to the wellbeing and
safety of the individual’s of the moral majority and any interference is obstruction of justice and indicative
of and expected of the government conspirators.

Should anyone harass you in anyway in performance of your duty all you need do is inform the Charter
Democracy Force and the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy is immediately dead
in the new era of Charter Democracy with the RCMP ensuring the wellbeing and safety of the
individual’s of the moral majority assuring the immoral minority will be aggressively attended to curing
them of their immoral inclinations as they acquiesce to conform to the moral society as stated or implied
by the Constitution as guaranteed by the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The conspirators are trapped where they painted themselves into a corner as documented and all you need
do is respond cooperatively FFF in performance of your duty as expected of you by the public in support
of the guarantee to every individual as provided by the Charter.

I will be publishing this document “The End of Government Organized Crime January 28 2008” on
the Charter Democracy Force web site of course under

I will expect an e-mail from you personally Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam immediately on receipt of this document
confirming it has not been obstructed of its intended recipient.

I request confirmation that you intend to cooperate as requested being competent responsible irreproachable FFF
with fortitude and conviction to the wellbeing and safety of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter assuring
the moral majority are in good hands with the RCMP

I reiterate if the RCMP upper echelon interferes in any way it will be immediately recognized in your
correspondence inserting one more nail in the conspirators’ coffin but if you are FFF and inform us of their
interference the last nail will be significantly placed.
To that endeavor I request you include in your response whether or not you were aware of the Charter Democracy
Force web site when you wrote me January 23 2008 (copy enclosed) and if so why you did not mention that in your
letter being attentive to detail and integrity which is imperative to this undertaking. Perhaps you were not cognizant
of the significance but it is important you understand that you do not understand the significance of every issue and
it is simply a matter of you being as informative as you possibly can, not being judicative in your writings censoring
the information, perhaps unbeknownst to you.

I draw your attention to the fact you state you have been busy reading the documents on my web site without
identifying the web site leaving the question as to which web site. Do you see what I mean?

You and I both know it couldn’t be the Charter Democracy Force web site because I had not thought about it until
after our phone conversation January 8 2008, but others are left in ambiguity allowing erroneous perceptions to
develop.

88
You go on to say when you have completed the review of the material the next step is to request a formal response
from the subjects of my complaint where it is very important that we are all clear as to which material you are
referring to which should be the material on web site Charter Democracy Force so that we can all analyze your
response and theirs for coherence to the facts published there which is of course pertinent to the issues being
investigated where the evidence is clearly documented irrefutably proving the Government Organized Crime of
corruption and conspiracy against the individuals of the moral majority as they refuse to support the Charter
guarantee.

A conclusion report prepared by a competent responsible irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction to the
support of the Charter guarantee will be consistent with the facts which they irrefutably prove as published on said
web site or irrefutably prove you are not a competent responsible irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction
to the support of the Charter guarantee.

I have been attentive in an effort to see that you are that competent responsible irreproachable person of fortitude
and conviction to the support of the Charter guarantee where it would be incomprehensible that you be anything but
which is demanded and required in support of the Charter.

So anything other than a competent report of that which the evidence irrefutably shows will implicate you in the
conspiracy and I truly would like to believe you are neither cooperating with the conspirators unknowingly nor
letting them influence your thinking which should be immediately apparent to you as they must do in their
persistence to keep the conspiracy intact.

I remind you there is no logical reason not to e-mail me to keep up to speed in this venture of the utmost importance
to the wellbeing and safety of the individuals of this Charter Democracy of Canada where the government proclaim
integrity, accountability and transparency which I ensure as I publish the documents for all to see in order as it goes
down in history.

Respectfully

Frank Gallagher

PS

The subjects of the complaints are recipients of the correspondence being aware of the said Charter Democracy
Force web site and should now be aware of the truth as clearly and irrefutably documented which should only
require you to immediately request their formal response asking why they refused to investigate the obvious
Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy as irrefutably documented where their response is
required to include who they consulted and who actually influenced their decision not to investigate.

Further delay to the obvious conclusion is adverse to the wellbeing and safety of the individuals of the moral
majority who are presently under attack by the conspirators with their Charter rights seriously compromised.

If you are the competent responsible irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction to the support of the Charter
guarantee you will know the URGENCY.

You, Sergeant Steinebach, Insp.Verheul and many others know the truth of what goes on behind closed doors and all
that is required is to tell it and the conspiracy is over. Once this web site is known to the people the conspirators will
be powerless and the RCMP independent to act on behalf of the moral society promised by the Charter signed sealed
and delivered by the Federal Government.

Trust has a very simple ideology; back the moral majority and they will back you.

I trust you understand.


89
You state you have been busy reading the documents but are you
actually on it full time because it requires your full attention to
comprehend the relativity and significance of each document to
the whole scheme of things which takes considerable
concentration if you are not adept to it.
It comes easy to me due my chosen career which I retired from
after 40 years.
Once you catch on to the consistency of the government
personnel not responding to the facts and evidence addressed, you
will understand why. The conspiracy of course.

“He who is sincere hits what is right, and apprehends without the
exercise of thought”
90

Do not do to others what you would not have done to yourself

Moral Majority Rule

2008

Constitution Act, 1982

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms


Moral Majority Rule
Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

52.(1)The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law


of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the
inconsistency, of no force or effect.
Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness

There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY…finally I began to make out what was
written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE

Government Lawyer
People’s enemy # 1
Organized Crime
Law Law

The Law Society of Upper Canada Democracy


91
January 20 2008 I provide evidence the government is corrupt and in a conspiracy of Organized Crime
against the moral majority and they consider that a personal problem. It is a personal
problem of every individual of the moral majority who are on their own, not being
To: See Pages 12 - 14 organized as we trust our taxes pay for the entire government and legal system to operate
consistent with the Constitution in support of the Charter guarantee to every individual
who is equal in all matters before and under the law entitled to equal protection and
benefit.
The Office of the DOJ is of the mistaken belief the system was financed for their benefit
and the Attorney General is the government’s chief legal advisor and hopes I will
understand he is not able to provide legal advice to members of the public.
For the 1000th time I am not seeking legal advice. I am advising the DOJ and all members
of the government involved in the legal system their M.O. is not consistent with the
Constitution and it fails to support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which of
course they know and this is just another demonstration of their attempt to cover up their
conspiracy against the people.
The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is responsible to see the
administration and enforcement of the Constitution is done according to the Constitution
consistent and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and I have
irrefutably proven during the course of dealing with personal matters he is in direct
defiance of the Law and in fact has illegally commandeered the entire legal system for the
protection and benefit of government staff against the moral majority.
The Ontario Attorney General is responsible to deal with these constitutional issues but
has refused to deal with them in similar fashion, however they are both legally responsible
and will be held accountable by the Charter Democracy Force.
This is just one more piece of documentary evidence which irrefutably proves Rob
Nicholson is the present kingpin of the Organized Crime against the moral majority.

The DOJ has admitted the Parliament of Canada is responsible for enacting federal law while
administering those laws is a provincial responsibility.
Let me state again that I am quite aware who is responsible to deal with the issues and I am
stating the Ontario Attorney General has refused to deal with his responsibilities as clearly and
irrefutably documented and published on my web sites.
The Office of the DOJ and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General have been provided the
irrefutable evidence as published on my web sites and they refuse to back the guarantee which the
Federal Government enacted and are responsible to assure the legal systems are consistent in
continuity in support of the Charter guarantee which the individual depends on for their safety and
wellbeing as guaranteed.
The individual is not responsible for any of the government’s shortcomings in their failure to
structure a competent system of responsible irreproachable competent personnel of fortitude and
conviction required for the support of the guarantee to the individual as provided by the Charter
enacted by the Federal Government which they are financed and responsible to do. It is absurdly
incomprehensible that such a pathetic system, absolutely incapable of backing the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights exists which the evidence irrefutably proves and then when you are all
provided the evidence which a responsible government person would immediately address in pursuant of the structured system demanded of the
guarantee you clearly demonstrate you people never had any intention of backing the guarantee. The evidence irrefutably shows you are very
capable of operating in continuity consistent to purpose however the purpose is not as required and demanded by the Constitution as financed by
the tax payer consistent to a moral society as promised to the moral majority. The evidence irrefutably proves you are bandits hiding your faces in
the pretext of administering the Law when in fact the evidence irrefutably proves you are of a “Mightier than thou and the Law and don’t give
a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights attitude” 92
The Charter Democracy Force does give a damn about the individual and has a hard time giving a damn about you.
The following is a copy of the Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General
which I downloaded from the Ontario Attorney General’s web site.

Undeniably the Office of the Ontario Attorney General is responsible for the pathetic totally incompetent
legal system administered and enforced in Canada which is not only incapable of backing the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights but the evidence irrefutably proves the government under the authority of the
Attorney General never intended to back the Charter and they continue to this day in defiance of the
Constitution Act, 1982 as they conspire against the moral majority in Organized Crime which the
taxpayer pays all there overhead as they administer law for profit to the benefit of the members of the
legal profession who make and administer the laws for their benefit being inconsistent with the Charter.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

It has been one cover up after another since the ORHT hearing June 30 2005 which is well documented.

I have made every effort to get the Federal Government to accept their responsibility for the support of
the guarantee and they have made every effort to cover it up which is well documented.

I have brought the matter of government corruption and conspiracy to the RCMP who refused to
investigate which is well documented.

I filed a complaint with the “Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP” November 8 2007
which they forwarded on to the RCMP Commissioner who is now required to address the issues in
accordance with the RCMP Act and has already been delinquent with a status report.

Both the Complaints Commission and the office of the RCMP Commissioner have proven to be
uncooperative in dealing with the issues being inconsistent with the Constitution Act non conducive to
the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which was predictable but now irrefutably
documented.

I and the public await the responses from the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and Pierre Leduc Insp.
RCMP – GRC Executive Assistant to the Commissioner along with a response from Andree Leduc,
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP (See pages 5-7)

The RCMP Commissioner is under the thumb of Honourable Stockwell Day Minister of Public Safety who has
already provided me with the irrefutable evidence of his involvement with the conspiracy where his M.O.
demonstrated in the document “Stockwell Day November 3 2007” is consistent with the rest of the conspirators who
do the Confucius “BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY” thing without dealing with the issues as
expected and required of government personnel financed in the service of the people to support the individual’s
Charter guarantee.

Of course Minister Stockwell Day is appointed by the Prime Minister as is the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada who work hand in hand on such issues that need to be covered up.

You all have refused to act responsibly in these matters irrefutably proving you are all involved in the conspiracy and
there is still the matter of the RCMP Pension Fund scandal linked to the DOJ and of course the Mulroney/Schreiber
thing linked to the Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

93
It was Mulroney who absconded with the RCMP making the Commissioner a Deputy Minister. Did he get a good
raise?

No doubt there are a gazillion of such scandals which have not surfaced at this point due your fortitude and
conviction to cover them up but they remain to be seen in due course.

By the way I have copied the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” Ontario to pages 8-11
if you care to look up your responsibilities.

Well, that’s enough for now, nothing you haven’t read from me before but I must make it perfectly clear as
to my intentions.

I with the Charter Democracy Force intend to eradicate the government Organized Crime of corruption
and conspiracy with the aid of the RCMP who have been illegitimately commandeered to the services of
the conspirators which is of course inconsistent with the Constitution as are you all and the laws legislated
by you all are subject to close scrutiny as to their consistency with the Constitution as per

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

The RCMP Commissioner has one of two options.

1) Act in a manner consistent with the Constitution


2) Act in a manner consistent with the conspiracy

We of the Charter Democracy Force and the moral majority not yet signed up as members wait
impatiently for RCMP Commissioner William Elliot to make this, what could be a most prolific
event in the annals of Canadian history certain to spread world wide being the greatest stride
against the struggle of humankind.

My intentions are quite clear and can not possibly be misconstrued nor can your intentions as
you do what you must do to attempt to keep your conspiracy and Organized Crime intact.

I remind you all once again the evidence has been distributed far and wide which can not be
traced through my computer and of course you know it has also been distributed to newspapers
across Canada.

Frank Gallagher

94
You government people are well aware of the part you play in this government Organized Crime conspired against
the moral majority creating a two tiered system in favor of the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada, their
affluent and influential friends and their political associates all being in on the conspiracy having been provided
the irrefutable evidence and failure to act in appropriate manner to expose it to the people conducive to their
wellbeing and safety as guaranteed to every individual by the Federal Government with the enactment of the
Constitution Act, 1982 defined in Part 1 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

As you are aware on November 8 2007 I initiated the beginning of the end of the Government conspiracy of
Organized Crime by filing a complaint with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP for
refusing to investigate Government Corruption and Conspiracy evidence on my web sites.

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

Lawyer File 14.doc


This column was published in the North Shore News on September 13 2000
Stockwell Day November 3.doc
Stockwell Day November 5 07.doc
Commission RCMP Complaints Dec. 27 2007.doc
Stockwell Day January 3 2008.doc
RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Fax RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Pierre Leduc,Insp January 11 2008.doc
Attentive
These documents published on the Charter foresight
Democracy trumps
Force solemn
web sitehindsight
clearly links Stockwell Day Minister of
Public Safety to the RCMP where he demonstrates the government conspirators diversionary tactics in the
document Stockwell
January 17, 2008 Day November 3.doc as Confucius informs they are won’t to do.
“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
Ladies and Gentlemen
BENEVOLENCE, of the government
RIGHTEOUSNESS andconspiracy of Organized
MORALITY…finally Crimetoagainst
I began the what
make out moralwas
majority
written
between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
Earlier today I e-mailed a document “the Exorcism of the Attorney Generals” to the e-mail addresses listed
on pages
From there34
onand
the 35 of said
typical documentand
incompetence with cover letter
reluctance to leton
thepage
RCMP33 copied here:
investigate their conspiracy is clearly
understandable, but not wise as they demonstrate their inconsistency with the Law not conducive to the
Cover letterguaranteed Charter rights for the obvious reason they don’t give a damn about the individual’s
individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights as all the evidence published on my web sites irrefutably proves.
January 17, 2008
They are trapped, backed into a corner with no way out but to further demonstrate their unscrupulous ways being
Urgent !! all to see which will be most definitely scrutinized by the Charter Democracy Force.
evidenced for

As we wait
Attention for the
RCMP RCMP Commissioner
Commissioner William
William Elliot and hisInsp.
Elliot Leduc
and Pierre RCMP
partner – GRC
in crime PierreExecutive Assistant
Leduc Insp. RCMP –toGRC
the
Executive Assistant to the Commissioner to bang the final nail in their coffins I highly recommend you people take
Commissioner
initiatives to distance yourselves from them which includes the Office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General
See of Canada and the PMO.
attachment
Any of you who come forward to the public exposing the Government Organized Crime against the moral majority
Immediate acknowledgement of receipt required.
evidence on my web sites will be immediately exonerated by the Charter Democracy Force and play a vital role in
the restructuring of the government conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
Immediate response to the January 11 2008 e-mail sent to Pierre Leduc Insp. RCMP – GRC Executive
Assistant
You are alltoaware
the Commissioner required
of my determination to seefrom both
justice the RCMP
served which Commissioner William
is impossible under theElliot
present Pierre Leduc
andillegitimate legal
Insp.
systemRCMP – GRC Executive
as the evidence irrefutably Assistant
proves andtoI can
the guarantee
Commissioner
any person having knowledge of the Corruption and
Conspiracy of the Government Organized Crime, which of course is everyone of you having been provided the
irrefutable evidence,
Frank Gallagher will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law if you do not immediately come forward
demanding an extensive PUBLIC INQUIRY which will be scrutinized by the Charter Democracy Force.

That you can take to the bank. 95


January 2 2008

RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Professional Standards Unit


File # 2007-1355445

Dear Commissioner

On November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
complaining that 2 members of the RCMP refused to investigate Government corruption and
conspiracy evidence on my web sites
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
and http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

I received acknowledgement from them dated November 8 2007 Files # PC-2007-2316 and
PC-2007-2317 stating in accordance with the RCMP Act they had forwarded my complaint to
you for appropriate action and you are required to acknowledge receipt of my complaint
within 45 days of receiving it and then provide me a status report every 30 days thereafter.
(See page 2)

I received acknowledgement of receipt dated November 16 2007 from the RCMP


Professional Standards Unit (see page 3)

It appears to me I should have received a status report from you dated December 16 2007 at
the latest making it well over due.

I would appreciate that status report ASAP please

Thank You

Frank Gallagher

96
97
98
From: Pierre Leduc
Date: 1/7/2008 3:45:04 PM
To: frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca
Cc: Diane Fauvelle
Subject: Fwd: Correction

Good afternoon Mr. Gallagher,

Just to let you know that your correspondence dated 2008.01.02 was
forwarded to me. I spoke with Sergeant Costa Dimopoulos this afternoon.
He advised me that an update had been prepared and had been forwarded to
you recently.

Sincerely,

Pierre Leduc, Insp.


RCMP - GRC
Executive Assistant to the Commissioner / Adjoint exécutif du
commissaire
Office: (613) 993-0882
Cell: (613) 552-1884
Fax: (613) 993-0309
e-mail: pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information and


is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above
(recipient). If you have received it in error, please advise the sender
immediately by reply e-mail and delete the original. Any further use of
this e-mail by you is strictly prohibited. E-mail/Courriel:
pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

99
January 11 2008

Frank Gallagher
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On
L4P 2P8
franklyone@hotmail.com

Pierre Leduc, Insp.


RCMP - GRC
Executive Assistant to the Commissioner /
Adjoint exécutif du commissaire
Office: (613) 993-0882
Cell: (613) 552-1884
Fax: (613) 993-0309
e-mail: pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: File 2007-1355445


Purpose to investigate complaints of 2 members http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
of the RCMP refusing to investigate Government
corruption and conspiracy filed with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
Files PC-2007-2316 and PC-2007-2316

Dear Pierre Leduc

This is a follow up of your recent e-mail to me January 7 2008 which you were addressing my January 2
2008 to the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot. (Copy enclosed See page 6)

It seems the further we get into this the further we get away from it, with the investigation needing an
investigation with more things to look into to determine the truth.

That is what this is all about is it not? To determine the truth, Right? At least that is my objective.

Of course that is not what the evidence on my web sites of the government indicates as the complaint
suggests.
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

Since I filed the complaint on November 8 2007 with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the
RCMP the correspondence with them and the RCMP Commissioner’s office is quite discerning being
indicative of what the evidence on the web sites show.

As the Guardians site will continue to add the evidence as it comes including this document which should
be easy enough to follow for a competent, responsible, irreproachable RCMP investigator with fortitude
and conviction to purpose which in this case is a matter of the government Organized Crime of corruption
and conspiracy against the people where the evidence irrefutably shows the government departments,
agencies whatever do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which is the
responsibility of the Federal Government to back the guarantee since they made it in the 1982 enactment of
the Constitution.

100
The purpose of this exercise is to make them give a damn and restructure the system to be consistent with
the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as is their obligation as per the
Charter and common law in the matter of putting your money where your mouth is as per the guarantee
they made and refuse to back.
This of course is a very serious issue which requires a very sane serious responsible competent
irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction who comprehends the seriousness of the situation,
understands the properties of a guarantee and the spirit intended under the supreme law of Canada which
recognizes the supremacy of God.

The 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document published at the top of web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
is indicative of the way the whole government system works which has been irrefutably proven by the
documents on my web site and would be recognized as such by a person with the necessary traits described
above.

The fact the RCMP have been apprized of the evidence since January 2006 which I have been providing
by e-mail using the Michael.Thomson@rcmp-rc.gc.ca address and Sgt. Roy Steinebach confirmed on October 18
2007 that the RCMP have been receiving it and have been keeping it on file is very disconcerting that they have not
acted upon it and of course is why I filed the complaint.

The fact that the evidence is so clear of the government Organized Crime, corruption and conspiracy it proves one
of two things or both and I highly suspect a combination of both.

The upper echelon is in on the conspiracy because it could not be happening without their cooperation and the rest
of the unit is not competent enough to recognize it or deal with it.

There is the natural course of things where they are all taught to follow the flow routinely with their knowledge of the
law gained through hand me down experience and legal information originating from the Office of the Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada and in Ontario focus is on being alert to Ontario Law.

Therein lays the problem because the Ontario laws are not consistent with the Constitution nor conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which they must be according to the Constitution.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

The point is the correspondence published on my web site which I have received since I filed my
complaint on November 8 2007 with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP,
irrefutably proves the incompetence and or loyalty to the conspiracy by both the Commission for
Complaints and the Office of the RCMP Commissioner who is ultimately responsible for the actions of the
RCMP.

Whether or not it is just incompetence which I shouldn’t say just, because it is a most serious factor that
has allowed the success of the Organized Crime.

The evidence continues to dig the RCMP deeper into the conspiracy and due the very serious nature of the
issues which requires a very sane serious responsible competent irreproachable person of fortitude and
conviction who comprehends the seriousness of the situation, the properties of a guarantee and the spirit
intended under the supreme law of Canada which recognizes the supremacy of God I demand you put a
person of those traits on the case full time which it requires.

101
2 months have passed since the complaint was filed and I get an update report from S/Sgt. Bob MacAdam
not representative of the facts as indicated on copy (page 7) You will see the facts of the telephone
conversation in my notes of the conversation dated December 21 2007 (page 5) (Please respond)

I can not comprehend the manner in which the RCMP are dealing with this very serious matter regarding
the government Organized Crime, corruption and conspiracy which concerns the foundation of the
Constitution of Canada and the wellbeing and safety of the moral majority of the Canadian people.

The RCMP Commissioner has been provided the opportunity to demonstrate the competence of the RCMP
under his command to uphold the law of the land conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
and I now provide you this evidence which demonstrates anything but concern for the law of the land and
the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights indicative of the entire government where their M.O. is
consistent with the M.O. of the Law Society of Upper Canada demonstrated quite effectively in the
document published on my web site “Law Society of Upper Canada Part 1 Part 2”

They are quite adamant their members needn’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights,
and state their members are not required to assess the validity of a clients unfounded complaint before
commencing proceedings against his clients adversary causing undue hardship on this individual.

They also state they are not required to look at the evidence in support of my complaint which is absolutely
insane and unfortunately that is just “How it is” in this democracy of Canada where justice is impossible
for the moral majority obviously due to the Government Organized Crime set up well organized against
them.

When I say organized I mean the entire personnel of the Government are loyal to the conspiracy with the
majority perhaps not even aware of it as they just follow routine as they have come to know and presume
the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is legit and who would know the law better than he
and his Office staff.

But damn it, the evidence irrefutably shows he is not the person he is expected to be and refuses to back
the Charter guarantee to every individual as is his responsibility and everyone employed in the legal
system.

He is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada with precisely the same “Mightier than thou and
the law…don’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights attitude”

This is painfully obvious as the prodigious amount of evidence on my web site irrefutably proves including
the cooperation of the RCMP.

The manner in which this complaint is being handled by both the Office of the Commission for Public
Complaints Against the RCMP and the Office of the RCMP Commissioner was predictable because it is
consistent with the entire operation of the government Organized Crime.

You must understand this exercise was initiated only to provide the last length of rope for you all to hang
yourselves with and I am not the least bit surprised you are not cognizant of it for you feel you have all the

102
loose ends tied up without a court in the land who would convict you without convicting themselves and
blowing the whole conspiracy wide open.

I realize you have control of the media but not the web site as I continue to get many hits every day.
The word is spreading to the people where it needs to be and there is no trial required as surely you must
know because it is being held publicly here and now providing you people all the irrefutable evidence and
your actions and responses are far more convincing than anything you may swear under oath with your left
hand on the Bible which means absolutely nothing to you people who do not give a damn about the
Constitution which recognizes the supremacy of God whose aspirations are to the well being of every
individual all being God’s children. Right?

For the record you are being offered the opportunity to distance your self from the conspiracy and given
the extraordinary seriousness of the situation concerning the wellbeing and safety of the moral majority
which are under siege at this moment it is incomprehensible that priority isn’t number one to this endeavor.

There is no middle ground, you are either clearly with the conspiracy or clearly with the law and the moral
majority where clear and decisive action is the only valid response.

This is the fairest trial ever held in Canada, or the world for that matter because you get to decide your
innocence or guilt and we the people will decide your fate.

We follow the “MODEL” set out for us by Confucius

“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”


Who are we?

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
103
This document will be found on http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-
rights-and-freedoms as usual with all the rest and of course e-mailed to my usual list which now includes
you.

We await your decision. For or against!!

The Charter Democracy Force is assembling the evidence in quick study form to efficiently and effectively
carry on business free of charge in service of the people being the people for the people

Yes really, quite a novel idea. Eh!

104
Memo

Friday December 21, 2007

Bob MacAdam of the RCMP Newmarket called around 2 PM and talked for about 15 minutes.

He has been on the case for 3 weeks but clarified not all the time as he has lots of other cases.
I mentioned that I was expecting the RCMP Commissioner’s 30 day status report which was due around
December 16 2007 but he didn’t know anything about that.

Bob said he is not investigating the conspiracy just the complaint.


“What’s to investigate?” I asked, “Did you talk to Sgt Steinebach…
He’s going to tell you I brought documents down to him about 7” thick evidencing government corruption
and conspiracy and he refused to take the documents and refused to investigate.”
“I had been e-mailing Michael Thomson the evidence but he wouldn’t respond.
Then I noticed on the RCMP web site that they wouldn’t accept documents by e-mail so I printed out the
files and took them down to the RCMP at Newmarket and eventually Sgt Steinebach met with me.”

After talking for about ½ an hour I asked the Sgt.if he knew me and he said yes, that the e-mail documents
I had been sending have been put into a file but they wouldn’t be investigating.

Just before my mother and I left I asked clearly and specifically if he was going to take the documents and
he said no he had them all on file but they won’t be investigating.

That’s my complaint. The RCMP won’t investigate and if he asks Sgt. Steinebach he will tell him the same
thing.

So what’s to investigate about the complaint?

He asked if I could drop down maybe next Friday to discuss the matter which I agreed to at first until I
asked if he had checked the evidence on the web site when he said no.

I asked why not? The instructions clearly stated the evidence was on the web site.

I want the government investigated and the evidence is irrefutable of the government conspiracy.
He mentioned again he was not investing the conspiracy just the complaint.

I told him to investigate the complaint he would have to study the evidence to see if it was a valid
complaint.

Is it trivia, frivolous or vexatious?

There is no need for me to drive down to Newmarket and he said okay but he may call me back.

105
I have sent 18 e-mails to the RCMP Commissioner since December 16 2007 when I
From: Pierre Leduc expected the status report and a number of them made mention of the due date so I wonder
why the 2008.01.02 was the one forwarded to you. This document is particularly germane
Date: 1/7/2008 3:45:04 PM Commission RCMP Complaints Dec. 27 2007.doc
To: frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca
Cc: Diane Fauvelle An example of the incompetence that runs rampant On December 21 2007 during
Subject: Fwd: Correction throughout which allows the success of the government
Organized Crime. a conversation with S/Sgt.
It of course looks like the Complaints Commission is Bob MacAdam I told him the
Good afternoon Mr. Gallagher, involved as well as the RCMP status report was due on
Commissioner
December 16 2007 already
Just to let you know that your correspondence dated 2008.01.02 was late and he had not even
forwarded to me. I spoke with Sergeant Costa Dimopoulos this afternoon. looked at the evidence on my
He advised me that an update had been prepared and had been forwarded to web site yet.
you recently.
Pierre Leduc
Please look into all these issues to clarify these contentious issues Even if 45 days from
Sincerely, I find it inane that a predetermined update stating nothing except the November 16 2007 45 days
investigation is continuing despite the attempt to make it appear I am
uncooperative incomprehensible that it can’t be sent on time. More would be December 31 2007
Pierre Leduc, Insp. incomprehensible is that which all the evidence continues to prove. but didn’t get written until
RCMP - GRC January 7 2008 the day you
Executive Assistant to the Commissioner / Adjoint exécutif du state it was already sent which
commissaire This is a very serious matter being dealt with of course is not true as Bob
Office: (613) 993-0882 routinely in the incompetent manner I am familiar told me on the 8th he still had
Cell: (613) 552-1884 with of government personnel having spent 10 it and was going to be mailed
Fax: (613) 993-0309 years with the province and 14 with City Toronto that day.
e-mail: pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca Please respond clarifying

Tuesday January 8 2008

The update was not in the mail today so I phoned Sergeant Costa Dimopoulos and left a message to call me.
S/Sgt R.B MacAdam returned the call and I asked him when the status report was sent.
He said it’s already and it’s going out today.
I said Pierre Leduc had informed me on Monday the 7th by e-mail that the update had recently been sent.

He also mentioned it really doesn’t say much, basically that the investigation is on going.
He mentioned again that this is not the only case he is doing and he is not working on it all the time.
He did say he was looking at the evidence on my web site and it will take him 6 months to go through it.
He was having some difficulty zeroing in on what the main complaint is.

At first I suggested if he just looked at the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document he would know something is
wrong with the legal system with their members running it.

Then I suggested he start at the beginning and once he knew the crimes by Don Wilson my former tenant were
committed right during the ORHT hearing and not dealt with it the rest will fall into place.
I mentioned the filing false and misleading information an offense under s. 206(2) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997
and when he reads the document to the Toronto Sun he will know the crimes were committed including the fraud for
over $100,000.
Why wouldn’t the ORHT at least deal with the Tenant Protection Act offense?
It’s all a cover up of the fact the Ontario laws are not constitutional. That’s why the cover up.

I also suggested he look at the “Mad Glad mostly Sad Why?” document and he remembered passing by it.
In fact that is the place to start.

Anyway Bob seemed like he was getting the idea and said that what he needed was some help and did I mind if he
called again to be helped through it which I was only too pleased and I would gladly meet with him if he wanted to
discuss the evidence of the government conspiracy.
106
Received January 11 2008

I do not like that statement, “despite the fact I did not


wish to meet “ the investigation is continuing.
That infers I am not cooperating with the investigation.
Talk about turning things 180 degrees around.

2 ½ years I have been trying to get a government person


to cooperate and the same with RCMP as I was looking
for the delinquent status report.
I was of the opinion it was due about December 16 2007.
His reference to a 45 day interim report contradicts the
November 8 2007 from the Complaints Commission
where I accepted the November 16 2007 letter from the
RCMP as the letter of acknowledgement of receipt of
complaint due in 45 days. Which is correct?
Please respond clarifying.

107
January 20, 2008

See attachment “Responsible for your own destiny Jan. 20 2008.doc”

Cover Page

This document is addressed to the government personnel linked to the following e-mail addresses for their
immediate attention and appropriate action consistent with the Constitution conducive to the support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which demands you all be competent responsible and irreproachable to that
endeavor where you must act with fortitude and conviction for the sanctity of the Constitution and the well being
and safety of the moral majority of the Canadian people where positive initiatives must be taken against the immoral
minority consistent with the wellbeing and safety of the moral majority as guaranteed by the Federal Government
whose personnel have all been significantly and more than adequately financed and held in trust to that endeavor.

The manner in which you respond is of the utmost concern to you and we individual’s of the moral majority whose
wellbeing and safety as guaranteed by the Charter is wholly dependent on all of you who must be able to
demonstrate a competent M.O. to that endeavor where there must be continuity of responsibility throughout the
government system where you must all be competent, responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction
to the support of the Constitution and the individual’s of the moral majority as guaranteed by the Federal
Government as documented by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

You all have two options and your actions will be documented which will be conclusive as to which side of the
Constitution you stand. There is no in between where it is your responsibility having accepted financial benefits to
act in service of the moral majority consistent with the Constitution.

1) Act in a manner consistent with the Constitution


2) Act in a manner consistent with the conspiracy

You are all cognizant of the facts having all been provided the exact same evidence published on my web sites
which you have all been provided the addresses and your decisions are of course your own which will be
representative of the spirit of your mind and be consequential to your futures.

I hope you understand for due the dire significance of your actions on the individual’s of the moral majority you will
be held accountable in a manner consistent with the Model of the Charter Democracy Force

“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness” where
vigilance to deterrence will be strictly maintained.

108
pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; attorneygeneral@jus.gov.on.ca;
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
Primetimecrime@gmail.com; webadmin@greenparty.ca;
info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org; edmonton@cba-alberta.org; cba@bccba.org; admin@cbanb.com;
cba-nl@nl.rogers.com; cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca; cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-
pei@isn.net; cba.sk@sasktel.net; cbayukon@internorth.com
ciec-ccie@parl.gc.ca;
ndpaoatlantic@ns.aliantzinc.ca; information@forces.gc.ca; ndpao-pacific@shaw.ca; ndpaocal@nucleus.com;
NDPAO@bellnet.ca; ndpao.mtl@videotron.ca; webmaster@forces.gc.ca;
AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca;
ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca; ascentive_newsletter@noreply.ascentive.com; ayala_disadvantage@hotmail.com;
admin@otla.com; atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca; anguswd@sen.parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca;
bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;
bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca; bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org; bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org; bergeron_hater_1976@hotmail.com;
buoyantly.ewing_1977@hotmail.com; BelleG@parl.gc.ca; bill@wgilmour.ca; complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca;
clgascon@fja.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; communications@ps.gc.ca; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
christine.elliott@pc.ola.org; city@thestar.ca; citydesk@tor.sunpub.com; comail@lsuc.ca; cgrech@yrng.com;
copelandj@scc-csc.gc.ca;
cdavis@relevantknowledge.com; Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca; charrf@sen.parl.gc.ca; coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca;
cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca; chapum@sen.parl.gc.ca; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca;
carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca; campbel@sen.parl.gc.ca; callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca
Day.S@parl.gc.ca; dwatch@web.net; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;
dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca; debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dinovoc-qp@ndp.on.ca; dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca; dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com;
dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca; damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca;
egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca; editor@tor.sunpub.com; ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org; elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;
dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com; dkristie558@toonear.info;
dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca; damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; editor@tor.sunpub.com; editor@rd.ca;; francois-giroux@cas-
satj.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca; fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca; frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca; fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca; fountain.threapers1960@hotmail.com;
Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca
gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;
goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca; grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca; gore.outsnoring_@hotmail.com;
Hill.J@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;
hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca; horton@adlib.ca; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; info@chfc.ca;
info@olderwomensnetwork.org; info@ocsj.ca; info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca; info@ohrc.on.ca; info@libertarian.ca;
justice@socialjustice.org; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca;

109
jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; julia.munroco@pc.ola.org; jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca;
jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca; johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;
jorgensen.unresisting_@hotmail.com; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca;Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca; kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca;
lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;
lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca; lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca; lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;
licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; Lussier.M@parl.gc.ca; Lake.M@parl.gc.ca; Laforest.J@parl.gc.ca;
mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org; machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca; massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca; meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca; mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca; merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca; mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca; munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca; mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca; McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;
nimhinfo@nih.gov; nejmcust@mms.org; prevention@ps.gc.ca; communications@ps.gc.ca;
mcknight.pycnodont@hotmail.com; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca; mphelps@otla.com; Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca;
nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca; ocap@tao.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;
Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca; pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca; pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca; prevention@ps.gc.ca; prognosticatingw371@mobilemessage.com; pwang@adni.net;
PoiliP@parl.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca; russem@sen.parl.gc.ca;
rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca; rattel@sen.parl.gc.ca; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;
spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca;
smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca; smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca; sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca; spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;
stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca; szwebmaster@yahoo.com;
support@besthotfilms.com; Symantec@reply.digitalriver.com; Sweet.D@parl.gc.ca;
terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca;
tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca; tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca; victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca;
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; vanlop1@parl.gc.ca; vanlop0@parl.gc.ca; webadmin@justice.gc.ca;
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; web@ps.gc.ca;
Williams.J@parl.gc.ca; Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca;
philreporter1989@yahoo.ca
editor@philreporter.com; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; info@vivelecanada.ca; nphlstatistician@hotmail.com.com;
press@transparency.org;
ti-can@transparency.ca; askgov@worldbank.org, sprayriver@yahoo.ca; newsroom@globeandmail.com;
news@citynews.ca; newsdesk@metronews.ca; admin@georginaadvocate.com;
admin@stouffvillesun.com

“Responsible for your own destiny Jan. 20 2008.doc”

110

Do not do to others what you would not have done to yourself

Moral Majority Rule

2008

Constitution Act, 1982

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms


Moral Majority Rule
Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

52.(1)The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law


of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the
inconsistency, of no force or effect.
Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness

There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY…finally I began to make out what was
written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE

Government Lawyer
People’s enemy # 1
Organized Crime
Law Law

The Law Society of Upper Canada Democracy


111
January 20 2008 I provide evidence the government is corrupt and in a conspiracy of Organized Crime
against the moral majority and they consider that a personal problem. It is a personal
problem of every individual of the moral majority who are on their own, not being
To: See Pages 12 - 14 organized as we trust our taxes pay for the entire government and legal system to operate
consistent with the Constitution in support of the Charter guarantee to every individual
who is equal in all matters before and under the law entitled to equal protection and
benefit.
The Office of the DOJ is of the mistaken belief the system was financed for their benefit
and the Attorney General is the government’s chief legal advisor and hopes I will
understand he is not able to provide legal advice to members of the public.
For the 1000th time I am not seeking legal advice. I am advising the DOJ and all members
of the government involved in the legal system their M.O. is not consistent with the
Constitution and it fails to support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which of
course they know and this is just another demonstration of their attempt to cover up their
conspiracy against the people.
The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is responsible to see the
administration and enforcement of the Constitution is done according to the Constitution
consistent and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and I have
irrefutably proven during the course of dealing with personal matters he is in direct
defiance of the Law and in fact has illegally commandeered the entire legal system for the
protection and benefit of government staff against the moral majority.
The Ontario Attorney General is responsible to deal with these constitutional issues but
has refused to deal with them in similar fashion, however they are both legally responsible
and will be held accountable by the Charter Democracy Force.
This is just one more piece of documentary evidence which irrefutably proves Rob
Nicholson is the present kingpin of the Organized Crime against the moral majority.

The DOJ has admitted the Parliament of Canada is responsible for enacting federal law while
administering those laws is a provincial responsibility.
Let me state again that I am quite aware who is responsible to deal with the issues and I am
stating the Ontario Attorney General has refused to deal with his responsibilities as clearly and
irrefutably documented and published on my web sites.
The Office of the DOJ and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General have been provided the
irrefutable evidence as published on my web sites and they refuse to back the guarantee which the
Federal Government enacted and are responsible to assure the legal systems are consistent in
continuity in support of the Charter guarantee which the individual depends on for their safety and
wellbeing as guaranteed.
The individual is not responsible for any of the government’s shortcomings in their failure to
structure a competent system of responsible irreproachable competent personnel of fortitude and
conviction required for the support of the guarantee to the individual as provided by the Charter
enacted by the Federal Government which they are financed and responsible to do. It is absurdly
incomprehensible that such a pathetic system, absolutely incapable of backing the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights exists which the evidence irrefutably proves and then when you are all
provided the evidence which a responsible government person would immediately address in pursuant of the structured system demanded of the
guarantee you clearly demonstrate you people never had any intention of backing the guarantee. The evidence irrefutably shows you are very
capable of operating in continuity consistent to purpose however the purpose is not as required and demanded by the Constitution as financed by
the tax payer consistent to a moral society as promised to the moral majority. The evidence irrefutably proves you are bandits hiding your faces in
the pretext of administering the Law when in fact the evidence irrefutably proves you are of a “Mightier than thou and the Law and don’t give
a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights attitude” 112
The Charter Democracy Force does give a damn about the individual and has a hard time giving a damn about you.
The following is a copy of the Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General
which I downloaded from the Ontario Attorney General’s web site.

Undeniably the Office of the Ontario Attorney General is responsible for the pathetic totally incompetent
legal system administered and enforced in Canada which is not only incapable of backing the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights but the evidence irrefutably proves the government under the authority of the
Attorney General never intended to back the Charter and they continue to this day in defiance of the
Constitution Act, 1982 as they conspire against the moral majority in Organized Crime which the
taxpayer pays all there overhead as they administer law for profit to the benefit of the members of the
legal profession who make and administer the laws for their benefit being inconsistent with the Charter.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

It has been one cover up after another since the ORHT hearing June 30 2005 which is well documented.

I have made every effort to get the Federal Government to accept their responsibility for the support of
the guarantee and they have made every effort to cover it up which is well documented.

I have brought the matter of government corruption and conspiracy to the RCMP who refused to
investigate which is well documented.

I filed a complaint with the “Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP” November 8 2007
which they forwarded on to the RCMP Commissioner who is now required to address the issues in
accordance with the RCMP Act and has already been delinquent with a status report.

Both the Complaints Commission and the office of the RCMP Commissioner have proven to be
uncooperative in dealing with the issues being inconsistent with the Constitution Act non conducive to
the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which was predictable but now irrefutably
documented.

I and the public await the responses from the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and Pierre Leduc Insp.
RCMP – GRC Executive Assistant to the Commissioner along with a response from Andree Leduc,
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP (See pages 5-7)

The RCMP Commissioner is under the thumb of Honourable Stockwell Day Minister of Public Safety who has
already provided me with the irrefutable evidence of his involvement with the conspiracy where his M.O.
demonstrated in the document “Stockwell Day November 3 2007” is consistent with the rest of the conspirators who
do the Confucius “BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY” thing without dealing with the issues as
expected and required of government personnel financed in the service of the people to support the individual’s
Charter guarantee.

Of course Minister Stockwell Day is appointed by the Prime Minister as is the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada who work hand in hand on such issues that need to be covered up.

You all have refused to act responsibly in these matters irrefutably proving you are all involved in the conspiracy and
there is still the matter of the RCMP Pension Fund scandal linked to the DOJ and of course the Mulroney/Schreiber
thing linked to the Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
It was Mulroney who absconded with the RCMP making the Commissioner a Deputy Minister. Did he get a good
raise?

113
No doubt there are a gazillion of such scandals which have not surfaced at this point due your fortitude and
conviction to cover them up but they remain to be seen in due course.

By the way I have copied the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” Ontario to pages 8-11
if you care to look up your responsibilities.

Well, that’s enough for now, nothing you haven’t read from me before but I must make it perfectly clear as
to my intentions.

I with the Charter Democracy Force intend to eradicate the government Organized Crime of corruption
and conspiracy with the aid of the RCMP who have been illegitimately commandeered to the services of
the conspirators which is of course inconsistent with the Constitution as are you all and the laws legislated
by you all are subject to close scrutiny as to their consistency with the Constitution as per

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

The RCMP Commissioner has one of two options.

3) Act in a manner consistent with the Constitution


4) Act in a manner consistent with the conspiracy

We of the Charter Democracy Force and the moral majority not yet signed up as members wait
impatiently for RCMP Commissioner William Elliot to make this, what could be a most prolific
event in the annals of Canadian history certain to spread world wide being the greatest stride
against the struggle of humankind.

My intentions are quite clear and can not possibly be misconstrued nor can your intentions as
you do what you must do to attempt to keep your conspiracy and Organized Crime intact.

I remind you all once again the evidence has been distributed far and wide which can not be
traced through my computer and of course you know it has also been distributed to newspapers
across Canada.

Frank Gallagher

114
Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General
The Attorney General has a unique role to play as a Minister.

One part of the Attorney General's role is that of a Cabinet Minister. In this capacity the Minister is
responsible for representing the interests and perspectives of the Ministry at Cabinet, while simultaneously
representing the interests and perspectives of Cabinet and consequently the Government to the Ministry
and the Ministry's communities of interest.

The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming
from this role are unlike those of any other Cabinet member. The role has been referred to as "judicial-
like" and as the "guardian of the public interest".

Much has been written on the subject of ministerial responsibilities and the unique role of the Attorney
General.

There are various components of the Attorney General's role. The Attorney General has unique
responsibilities to the Crown, the courts, the Legislature and the executive branch of government. While
there are different emphases and nuances attached to these there is a general theme throughout all the
various aspects of the Attorney General's responsibilities that the office has a constitutional and
traditional responsibility beyond that of a political minister.

The statutory responsibilities of the office are found in section 5 of the Ministry of the Attorney General
Act. Section 5 states:

The Attorney General,


(a) is the Law Officer of the Executive Council;
(b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law;
(c) shall superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario;
(d) shall perform the duties and have the powers that belong to the Attorney General and Solicitor General
of England by law and usage, so far as those powers and duties are applicable to Ontario, and also shall
perform the duties and powers that, until the Constitution Act, 1867 came into effect, belonged to the
offices of the Attorney General and Solicitor General in the provinces of Canada and Upper Canada and
which, under the provisions of that Act, are within the scope of the powers of the Legislature;
(e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and
upon all matters of law referred to him or her by the Government;
(f) shall advise the Government upon all matters of a legislative nature and superintend all Government
measures of a legislative nature;
(g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law
connected with such ministries and agency;
(h) shall conduct and regulate all litigation for and against the Crown or any ministry or agency of
government in respect of any subject within the authority or jurisdiction of the Legislature;
(i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices;
(j) shall perform such other functions as are assigned to him or her by the Legislature or by the Lieutenant
Governor in Council. "

115
What follows is an overview of the various components of the Attorney General's roles and
responsibilities, primarily as outlined in the Act.

Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a))


The role of chief law officer might be referred to as the Attorney General's overall responsibility as the
independent legal advisor to the Cabinet - and some have even suggested that the role possibly extends to
the Legislature as well. The importance of the independence of the role is fundamental to the position and
well established in common law, statutes and tradition.
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.

The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained
and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.

In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General's
policy advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet. The Attorney General's legal
advice or constitutional advice should not be lightly disregarded. The Attorney General's policy advice has
the same weight as that of other ministers.

Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d))


One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General's role is the responsibility for
criminal prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section 92
gives the provinces authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justice and
thereby gives the provincial Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal
Code.

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General
and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether or
not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the prosecution
should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.

It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry out the
Minister's criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political
pressures. The Attorney General's responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken -
and seen to be undertaken - on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations.
Whether to initiate or stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy. This responsibility
has been characterized as a matter of the Attorney General acting as the Queen's Attorney - not as a
Minister of the government of the day.

This is not to suggest that decisions regarding criminal prosecutions are made in a complete vacuum. A
wide range of policy considerations may be weighed in executing this responsibility, and the Attorney
General may choose to consult the Cabinet on some of these considerations. However any decisions
relating to the conduct of individual prosecutions must be the Attorney General's alone and
independent of the traditional Cabinet decision making process. In practice, in the vast majority of cases,
these decisions are made by the Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys.

116
An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting criminal
prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which includes not only
the community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a distinct
responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available.

The responsibility is to present the case fairly - not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of
criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One of the
Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the public in
understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.

Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature,
for decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the
prosecution is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicae rule
bars any comment on a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub judicae rule
strictly prohibits the Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions that are before the courts. Given
the stature of the Attorney General's position, any public comment coming from the office would be seen
as an attempt to influence the case.

Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individual criminal
cases, such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political interference.
Accordingly, it is traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of the Attorney
General's agents, the Crown Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where the public
would expect the Attorney General to be briefed.

Legislative Responsibilities (s. 5(e) and (f))

The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These
responsibilities have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in
accordance with principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) above). This is obviously
an important and broad area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise on
the constitutionality and legality of legislation.

The Attorney General's legislative responsibilities are played out in a variety roles. The Office of
Legislative Counsel reports to the Attorney General. Legislative Counsel plays a key role in ensuring the
legal integrity of Government legislation. Although the Legislative Counsel's reporting relationship to
the Attorney General does allow the Attorney General to provide guidance and set standards, individual
pieces of legislation are drafted on instructions from client ministries and are not within the sole control of
Legislative Counsel or the Attorney General. It should also be noted that Legislative Counsel also has a
direct responsibility to the Legislature as the Office also drafts all private member's bills.

The Attorney General has a further role to play as part of whatever Cabinet Committee is formed to review
legislation and regulations. Here the Minister has an opportunity to comment on the technical issues
related to legislation and regulations prior to Cabinet consideration.

The Attorney General's role on legislative matters is as an adviser to the Cabinet. Although unlikely,
Cabinet could, in theory, receive the Attorney General's legal opinion on legislation and choose to
disregard it. The Attorney General's role is not independent of Cabinet decision making as in the area of
criminal prosecutions. As was noted earlier, the Attorney General must make careful distinctions about the
legal opinions and policy or political preferences being offered about legislation.
117
Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d))
In addition to the specific responsibilities to conduct civil litigation on behalf of the Government and its
agencies (s. 5(h)), the Attorney General has broader litigation responsibilities flowing from the historical
powers of the Attorney General referred to in s. 5(d) of the Act. These powers are based on the Crown's
parens patriae (parental) authority. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only to conduct
litigation in cases directly affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases where
there is a clear matter of public interest or public rights at stake.

This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public
interest is well and independently represented. It may involve interventions
in private litigation or Charter challenges to legislation, even if the arguments conclude that the
legislation does contravene constitutionally protected rights.

Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c))

A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice in
the province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison
with the judiciary.

Given the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, the responsibility for courts
administration is often a very sensitive and delicate issue. Great care and respect for the principles of
judicial independence must be exercised in this area.

Due regard must be attentive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights whereas there is no mention of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General”, being
coincidental to the “Mightier than thou and the law and the don’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights attitude” clearly demonstrated by the government personnel and of course the infamous Law Society
of Upper Canada who needn’t concern themselves with the evidence in making decisions as to the predetermined
innocence of their members. His “Roles and….” must be consistent with the Constitution.

The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” doesn’t mention Common Sense either but the
Charter Democracy Force is attentive to and accepts nothing other than Common Sense interpretations to validate
consistency with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

(g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law connected with
such ministries and agency;
Does agencies include the purportedly independent agencies such as the Ombudsman and the Ontario
Civilian Commission on Police Services and so on like that?
I’ll betcha.

This links the Attorney General to the original issues occurring at the ORHT, the Investigations and
Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Minister of Municipal Affairs
and Housing as detailed in Lawyer Files 1-3 and the Ombudsman Lawyer File 4

The totally absurd actions of these people inconsistent with competence, common sense, the Constitution and
the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights are obviously due to advice from the Attorney General who had a
vested interest in covering up the inconsistencies of the Ontario Government’s laws and M.O. with the
Constitution.

118
Attentive foresight trumps solemn hindsight

January 17, 2008

Ladies and Gentlemen of the government conspiracy of Organized Crime against the moral majority

Earlier today I e-mailed a document “the Exorcism of the Attorney Generals” to the e-mail addresses listed
on pages 34 and 35 of said document with cover letter on page 33 copied here:
Cover letter

January 17, 2008

Urgent !!
Attention RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and Pierre Leduc Insp. RCMP – GRC Executive Assistant to the
Commissioner

See attachment

Immediate acknowledgement of receipt required.

Immediate response to the January 11 2008 e-mail sent to Pierre Leduc Insp. RCMP – GRC Executive
Assistant to the Commissioner required from both the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and Pierre Leduc
Insp. RCMP – GRC Executive Assistant to the Commissioner

Frank Gallagher

119
You government people are well aware of the part you play in this government Organized Crime conspired against
the moral majority creating a two tiered system in favour of the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada,
their affluent and influential friends and their political associates all being in on the conspiracy having been
provided the irrefutable evidence and failure to act in appropriate manner to expose it to the people conducive to
their wellbeing and safety as guaranteed to every individual by the Federal Government with the enactment of the
Constitution Act, 1982 defined in Part 1 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

As you are aware on November 8 2007 I initiated the beginning of the end of the Government conspiracy of
Organized Crime by filing a complaint with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP for
refusing to investigate Government Corruption and Conspiracy evidence on my web sites.

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

Lawyer File 14.doc


This column was published in the North Shore News on September 13 2000
Stockwell Day November 3.doc
Stockwell Day November 5 07.doc
Commission RCMP Complaints Dec. 27 2007.doc
Stockwell Day January 3 2008.doc
RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Fax RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Pierre Leduc,Insp January 11 2008.doc
the Exorism of the Attorney Generals.doc

These documents published on the Charter Democracy Force web site clearly links Stockwell Day Minister of
Public Safety to the RCMP where he demonstrates the government conspirators diversionary tactics in the
document Stockwell Day November 3.doc as Confucius informs they are won’t to do.

“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY…finally I began to make out what was written
between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”

From there on the typical incompetence and reluctance to let the RCMP investigate their conspiracy is clearly
understandable, but not wise as they demonstrate their inconsistency with the Law not conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights for the obvious reason they don’t give a damn about the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights as all the evidence published on my web sites irrefutably proves.

They are trapped, backed into a corner with no way out but to further demonstrate their unscrupulous ways being
evidenced for all to see which will be most definitely scrutinized by the Charter Democracy Force.

As we wait for the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and his partner in crime Pierre Leduc Insp. RCMP – GRC
Executive Assistant to the Commissioner to bang the final nail in their coffins I highly recommend you people take
initiatives to distance yourselves from them which includes the Office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada and the PMO.

Any of you who come forward to the public exposing the Government Organized Crime against the moral majority
evidence on my web sites will be immediately exonerated by the Charter Democracy Force and play a vital role in
the restructuring of the government conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

You are all aware of my determination to see justice served which is impossible under the present illegitimate legal
system as the evidence irrefutably proves and I can guarantee any person having knowledge of the Corruption and
Conspiracy of the Government Organized Crime, which of course is everyone of you having been provided the
irrefutable evidence, will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law if you do not immediately come forward
demanding an extensive PUBLIC INQUIRY which will be scrutinized by the Charter Democracy Force.
120
That you can take to the bank.
Everyone of you who does not come forward in respect of the law, God and His people will be
prosecuted at your own expense and on conviction which the evidence against you is convincing, will be
terminated without pension and initiatives will be taken for restitution in accordance with the justice as
defined by Confucius and adopted by the Charter Democracy Force.

“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”

I know to many of you this is a reiteration upon reiteration over and over again, which of course it is but
more importantly it is a demonstration of the consistency of the Charter Democracy Force which you will
come to know being absent in your present repertoire.

Many of you feel you will be rewarded and protected for your loyalty by the conspirators but I have to
ask “Who would that be? They are all going down and the Charter Democracy Force guarantees that.

I know this is an unfamiliar word to you all so I take this opportunity to bring you up to speed.

Guarantee
Assurance, promise, pledge, agreement, security, warranty, certification, undertaking

A guarantee not supported is as useless as the people who initiated it. DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

Given the major importance of the guarantee which plays a vital role in the safety and wellbeing of every
individual of the moral majority as promised by the Federal Government defined in the Charter it is
incomprehensible that you people who are financed in the service of the people would ignore their plight
and damn well stupid to document your indifference to them as you have persistently done under the
circumstances where you have been inundated with the irrefutable evidence of the conspiracy of the
Government Organized Crime against the people.

There is a huge difference in not being aware, which is highly improbable of those in the upper echelon,
and being aware but that scenario has been eliminated by my dedication to inform.

It is presumed you are all well educated and know the ins and outs of the legal system which ultimately
implicates you but the irrefutable evidence I have provided you all leaves you with a go directly to jail
card with an option to turn it in on this offer I make.

I know you have all been strongly influenced by the Fiction of the Attorney General but like all fiction,
vanish with the truth and that reality you had best adjust to now before the reality of consequence.

“They must often change, who would be constant in happiness or wisdom.”

“The Times They Are A Changin” Will you be happy? Are you wise?

Andree Leduc, Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP


Re: Commission RCMP Complaint Dec. 27 2007.doc e-mailed and faxed to you published on my web site

I have provided you many opportunities to respond as to whether or not you will cooperate with me consistent with
the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

This is your last chance. Respond immediately to that document precisely as requested FFF

Frank Gallagher Charter Democracy Force


Que sera sera, whatever will be will be…. but “Attentive foresight trumps solemn hindsight” 121
The legal system has been designed by lawyers to make huge profits from the tax payers who are made to
finance the whole damn system for their benefit where the Law Society of Upper Canada have admitted
they don’t give a damn about the individuals guaranteed Charter rights and their only obligation is to
vigorously advance the interests of those people who pay them while they trample all over the rights of the
moral majority.
They don’t give a damn about the damage they cause to the moral majority as they do everything possible
to keep the immoral minority at large drumming up business for them.
What should be a simple case is made into long drawn out efforts as the lawyers draw on the public funds
of the moral majority financing the majority of the immoral minority’s defenses while the majority of the
moral majority have to finance their own case as the defense lawyer scrutinizes every move that was made
on the arrest to see if the immoral minority’s Charter rights were compromised. Not one lawyer in the
government cares about the moral majority’s Charter rights.
The purpose of law is to protect the moral majority from the immoral minority and the lawyers have turned
everything around protecting the immoral minority from the justice of the moral majority.
On arrest the immoral are advised of their right not to say anything which will incriminate them which
would be too easy for the victim to receive justice and then they have the right not to testify in case they let
something slip. The lawyer coaches them and they have plenty of time to dream up a story with alibis
which they wouldn’t have had if they were required to speak at the time of arrest.
Not being able to search ones property for evidence is absolutely ridiculous if reasonable evidence has
been provided by the victim. An innocent law abiding person would have no reason not to be cooperative
doing the responsible thing for the wellbeing and safety of society as a whole.
The system is designed for the immoral by the unscrupulous immoral lawyers who have turned the legal
system into a money making operation rather than a system attentive to deterrence, allowing immorality to
flourish which lawyers do very well.
The government lawyers have an agreement with the public sector lawyers to leave each other alone as
they ransack the moral majority and the victims.
The rules of law are a web of deceit woven by the government lawyers in an attempt to appear beneficial to
society which require long debates all financed by the moral majority for the benefit of the immoral
minority.
The government favours the big businesses keeping the minimum wage low causing many to seek out a
better lifestyle in crime which all ends up in costing the taxpayer.
Many people can’t afford housing so they provide them cheap housing again at the expense of the
taxpayer.
They provide them all kinds of right offs which the moral majority can’t utilize and then they are forced to
make up the difference which the wealthier wrote off. It just goes on and on and it is the middle class of
the moral majority who take the brunt of their evil ways.
The government doesn’t look for cheaper ways to administer the necessities of society as I have irrefutable
proof dealing with the City of Toronto’s Mayor’s Office who is involved with a cover up of the Gallagher
papers which can be found on http://groups.google.com/group/franklyone . I am not through with them but
first things first.

The people have had enough and are uniting with the Charter Democracy Force to put an end to this
insanity. A PUBLIC INQUIRY is demanded and it is time for one of you people to come forward on
behalf of the moral majority who work hard for their money only to be ripped off every where they turn.

I remind you all that in order to meet the requirements of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights it is
incumbent upon all of you to work responsibly in continuity and the evidence should be quite a shock to
you of the ineptness of the government to fulfill its obligations to the people which the moral majority
laboriously finance.
Obviously it is not a shock to you and your failure to act appropriately secures your place for punishment
as attentiveness is to initiatives of deterrence ensuring such people as you think twice before messing with
the minds and hard earned money of the moral majority to benefit the immoral minority..
122
January 28 2008

IMPORTANT

Office of the RCMP Commissioner

Please see that Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam receives the


attached document

“The End of Government Organized Crime January 28 2008”

123
January 28, 2008 The End of Government Organized Crime

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Your File 2007-1355445


Interim Report of January 23 2008
Government Organized Crime
Corruption and Conspiracy

Dear Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam

This is to inform you I am in receipt of your 30 day interim report of January 23 2008 (copy page 5) and I
am quite appreciative it is more informative and only 16 days since your last report.

I am of the presumption this was induced by your superiors Insp. Pierre Leduc and RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot avoiding the issues but reacting to documents Pierre Leduc,Insp January 11 2008.doc, and
Responsible for your destiny Jan. 20 2008.doc listed below which you will find on my web site Charter
Democracy Force http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

Lawyer File 14.doc


This column was published in the North Shore News on September 13 2000
Stockwell Day November 3.doc
Stockwell Day November 5 07.doc
Commission RCMP Complaints Dec. 27 2007.doc
Stockwell Day January 3 2008.doc
RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Fax RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Pierre Leduc,Insp January 11 2008.doc
the Exorism of the Attorney Generals.doc
Responsible for your destiny Jan. 20 2008.doc

124
I created this site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force following our telephone
conversation of January 8 2008 in an effort to simplify the analysis of the information published on my
other 9 web sites which are listed on the said web site.

This was done to keep a semblance to order so you and all the government personnel could be kept up to
speed and even more important so the public can easily read the facts pertinent to the Government
Organized Crime of corruption and Conspiracy against them.

Your letter of January 23 2008 makes no mention of the Charter Democracy Force web site so I presume
you have not been forwarded the information indicating a break down in communications being quite
disconcerting due the humongous serious nature of the issues.

Telephone conversations are subject to misinterpretations and summaries misleading being of limited
value in analyzing the evidence in search of the truth.

I am aware you have policies and routines to follow being under the thumbs of your superiors but given the
nature of the issues where the RCMP upper echelon are highly implicated to the government conspiracy
having authority over you to orchestrate this investigation I make every effort to eliminate ambiguity by
document, publishing it on the web site expecting responses coherent to the issues and context which are
addressed which have been wanting.

As you are aware all correspondence with government personnel is being published on my web site in a
format far superior to a PUBLIC INQUIRY because it is being documented in real time with the
government personnel being provided the evidence as it happens with every opportunity to react in a
manner consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

The public gets a bird’s eye view of the government personnel in action demonstrating their every which
way but competent responsible irreproachable approach FFF with fortitude and conviction to the support
of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

It is to this endeavor I request your e-mail address so that I can be assured the information I need you to
have is getting to you so you can perform your duty competently and the public will have the evidence that
you did so addressing the issues presented you.

You are aware of the RCMP members who had the courage to come forward about the RCMP Pension
Fund scandal and during the hearing of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts when the DOJ was
linked the Standing Committee was ordered to sit on it while Honorable Stockwell Day Minister of Public
Safety determined a Task Force was the best way to divert attention from the DOJ and mission was
temporarily accomplished but not done with, which the Charter Democracy Force can assure you.

The harassment days of the RCMP upper echelon against the members of the people’s RCMP are over as I
can assure you it will be nipped in the bud if you put all the facts in your correspondence to me.

125
Due to circumstance with the RCMP upper echelon highly suspected of interfering with the RCMP in
performance of their duty to enforce the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights if you were to be more informative in your correspondence as to the circumstance which has
initiated your letter expedience to the resolve will be FFF (Forthright, Forthcoming and Forthwith).

If you were directed by a superior your letter should clearly state so which is significant to this Charter
Democracy Force “PUBLIC INQUIRY”

The truth is what we seek in efficient and effective manner where expedience is vital to the wellbeing and
safety of the individual’s of the moral majority and any interference is obstruction of justice and indicative
of and expected of the government conspirators.

Should anyone harass you in anyway in performance of your duty all you need do is inform the Charter
Democracy Force and the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy is immediately dead
in the new era of Charter Democracy with the RCMP ensuring the wellbeing and safety of the
individual’s of the moral majority assuring the immoral minority will be aggressively attended to curing
them of their immoral inclinations as they acquiesce to conform to the moral society as stated or implied
by the Constitution as guaranteed by the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The conspirators are trapped where they painted themselves into a corner as documented and all you need
do is respond cooperatively FFF in performance of your duty as expected of you by the public in support
of the guarantee to every individual as provided by the Charter.

I will be publishing this document “The End of Government Organized Crime January 28 2008” on
the Charter Democracy Force web site of course under

I will expect an e-mail from you personally Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam immediately on receipt of this document
confirming it has not been obstructed of its intended recipient.

I request confirmation that you intend to cooperate as requested being competent responsible irreproachable FFF
with fortitude and conviction to the wellbeing and safety of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter assuring
the moral majority are in good hands with the RCMP

I reiterate if the RCMP upper echelon interferes in any way it will be immediately recognized in your
correspondence inserting one more nail in the conspirators’ coffin but if you are FFF and inform us of their
interference the last nail will be significantly placed.
To that endeavor I request you include in your response whether or not you were aware of the Charter Democracy
Force web site when you wrote me January 23 2008 (copy enclosed) and if so why you did not mention that in your
letter being attentive to detail and integrity which is imperative to this undertaking. Perhaps you were not cognizant
of the significance but it is important you understand that you do not understand the significance of every issue and
it is simply a matter of you being as informative as you possibly can, not being judicative in your writings censoring
the information, perhaps unbeknownst to you.

I draw your attention to the fact you state you have been busy reading the documents on my web site without
identifying the web site leaving the question as to which web site. Do you see what I mean?

You and I both know it couldn’t be the Charter Democracy Force web site because I had not thought about it until
after our phone conversation January 8 2008, but others are left in ambiguity allowing erroneous perceptions to
develop.

126
You go on to say when you have completed the review of the material the next step is to request a formal response
from the subjects of my complaint where it is very important that we are all clear as to which material you are
referring to which should be the material on web site Charter Democracy Force so that we can all analyze your
response and theirs for coherence to the facts published there which is of course pertinent to the issues being
investigated where the evidence is clearly documented irrefutably proving the Government Organized Crime of
corruption and conspiracy against the individuals of the moral majority as they refuse to support the Charter
guarantee.
A conclusion report prepared by a competent responsible irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction to the
support of the Charter guarantee will be consistent with the facts which they irrefutably prove as published on said
web site or irrefutably prove you are not a competent responsible irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction
to the support of the Charter guarantee.

I have been attentive in an effort to see that you are that competent responsible irreproachable person of fortitude
and conviction to the support of the Charter guarantee where it would be incomprehensible that you be anything but
which is demanded and required in support of the Charter.

So anything other than a competent report of that which the evidence irrefutably shows will implicate you in the
conspiracy and I truly would like to believe you are neither cooperating with the conspirators unknowingly nor
letting them influence your thinking which should be immediately apparent to you as they must do in their
persistence to keep the conspiracy intact.

I remind you there is no logical reason not to e-mail me to keep up to speed in this venture of the utmost importance
to the wellbeing and safety of the individuals of this Charter Democracy of Canada where the government proclaim
integrity, accountability and transparency which I ensure as I publish the documents for all to see in order as it goes
down in history.

Respectfully
Frank Gallagher

PS

The subjects of the complaints are recipients of the correspondence being aware of the said Charter Democracy
Force web site and should now be aware of the truth as clearly and irrefutably documented which should only
require you to immediately request their formal response asking why they refused to investigate the obvious
Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy as irrefutably documented where their response is
required to include who they consulted and who actually influenced their decision not to investigate.

Further delay to the obvious conclusion is adverse to the wellbeing and safety of the individuals of the moral
majority who are presently under attack by the conspirators with their Charter rights seriously compromised.

If you are the competent responsible irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction to the support of the Charter
guarantee you will know the URGENCY.

You, Sergeant Steinebach, Insp.Verheul and many others know the truth of what goes on behind closed doors and all
that is required is to tell it and the conspiracy is over. Once this web site is known to the people the conspirators will
be powerless and the RCMP independent to act on behalf of the moral society promised by the Charter signed sealed
and delivered by the Federal Government.

Trust has a very simple ideology; back the moral majority and they will back you.
I trust you understand.

127
You state you have been busy reading the documents but are you
actually on it full time because it requires your full attention to
comprehend the relativity and significance of each document to
the whole scheme of things which takes considerable
concentration if you are not adept to it.
It comes easy to me due my chosen career which I retired from
after 40 years.
Once you catch on to the consistency of the government
personnel not responding to the facts and evidence addressed, you
will understand why. The conspiracy of course.

“He who is sincere hits what is right, and apprehends without the
exercise of thought”
128
February 2, 2008

To

webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Telephone conversation yesterday at about 5:30 PM

Having not heard from you Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam in response to my e-mail directed to you through the
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca address with “The End of Government Organized Crime January 28
2008” document attached I fired off three e-mails around 3 PM yesterday (copies enclosed) to see if
anyone from the RCMP would cooperate with me.
At about 5:30 PM yesterday you phoned me as requested and I asked if you had received the e-mail I sent and you
responded you just got it requesting I phone you. I asked who you got the message from and you stated Roy
Steinebach.

The other two messages requested your e-mail address but I have not yet received it, not even from you.

During the 15-20 minute conversation you informed me that you had received the other e-mails I had sent through
the webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca address and I asked why you had not responded to the “The End of
Government Organized Crime January 28 2008” document and you replied that you are only required
to address the evident provided in the original complaint when I said given the seriousness of the issues I
would think you would want all the help you can get and it was you who had asked me for help
deciphering the evidence, during our telephone conversation of January 8 2008.
I went on to say you had not mentioned the Charter Democracy Force web site in your recent letter January
23 2008 and I wanted to make sure you received it as stated in the “The End of Government Organized
Crime January 28 2008”.

You asked if the evidence on the Charter Democracy Force web site is that which was provided to Sgt.
Steinebach which my mother witnessed and I said yes, it was the same information which I had printed out
being about 7 inches thick and taken to the RCMP October 18 2007.

Sgt. Steinebach had stated that he had all the documents which I had been sending to the Michael
Thomson RCMP Milton e-mail address and went on to say they had opened a file for all the e-mails I have
been sending, which goes back to January 2006.

I continued to use this e-mail address long after he declined to investigate on October 18 2007 and the
filing of the complaint on November 8 2007 with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the
RCMP.

Sometime after the filing of the complaint I noticed the Michael Thomson RCMP Milton e-mail address
was rejecting my e-mails so I acquired the e-mail addresses of Sgt Roy Steinebach of the Newmarket

129
detachment and Insp. Brian Verhuel of the Milton detachment through the webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
address and have provided them my Charter Democracy Force web site and continued to provide them
with all the e-mails I send to the rest of the pertinent government personnel whose e-mail addresses can be
found on the said web site under link to document AAAAAAAAAAList

So the fact is all the evidence found on my Charter Democracy Force web site has been provided to them
to date and will continue until their web sites reject the evidence which would possibly be considered
obstruction of justice and an attempt to cover up the conspiracy, whether or not the RCMP attempt to bring
up the technicality of the November 8 2007 date of the filing of the complaint which stated evidence to be
found on web sites
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms

These sites are still pertinent to the requested investigation of the Government corruption and conspiracy
which the subject RCMP members declined to investigate and the new web site Charter Democracy
Force was created in a semblance to order to make it easier to comprehend for both you and my other
reluctant readers and most importantly the PUBLIC who would not be so reluctant.

Under the circumstances it would be inane and considered just another ploy to cover up the Government
Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy against the people if you were not to deal with all the
evidence provided you.

If you don’t it would be a humungous waste of tax payers money for me to file another complaint adding the
evidence which you decline to look at due to a date technicality relative to the complaint against the two subjects
when they continue to decline to investigate to this day having been provided the evidence to date.

The majority of the material filed, if not all since the filing of the complaint has been published to aid you and the
others in your thinking which has been befuddled due to the conspirators who have failed to restructure the legal
system to that required and demanded by the Constitution Act, 1982 in support and conducive to the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees every individual certain rights as provided by the Charter.

Once again I inform you

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

It is imperative to the investigation that you comprehend the meaning of this.

I have consistently, persistently reiterated upon reiteration over and over again that you people of the RCMP and
others in the legal system, including lawyers have all been taught and trained in a system designed by the
prominent members of the conspiracy which is ultimately headed by the Office of the Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada whereas all you people involved with the legal system, get your experience and
knowledge handed down from your superiors and associates which was handed down from the conspirators since
1982.

You must be able to think sanely with open mind to that which I have reiterated so many times using good old
COMMON SENSE and COMMON LAW consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982 conducive to the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the
rule of law.

The Federal Government through the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 guaranteed every individual Charter
rights of equal protection and benefits in all matters before and under the law which they are obliged to support as

130
well as anyone else providing a guarantee such as a car company which would go under if they didn’t back the
guarantee.

This present government system will go under likewise as the word gets out and that is the guarantee and purpose
of the Charter Democracy Force of the people for the people which the evidence irrefutably proves the government
and legal system has been structured through the confiscation of the taxpayers’ money for the benefit of the
conspirators and their affluent and influential associates creating a two tier system to the humongous detriment of
the moral majority.

The evidence shows all the government personnel who have responded to the issues have acted peculiarly
incompetent, incoherent to the evidence consistent with the M.O. of the Law Society of Upper Canada who are of
the “Mightier than thou and the Law…don’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights attitude”
who have no use for evidence in concluding their predetermined decisions as to whether or not any of their
members are guilty of a complaint filed against them.

If the governments and the legal system personnel were competent, responsible and irreproachable people of
fortitude and conviction to the support of the guarantee which is demanded and required to back such a guarantee
they would be able to demonstrate they have a modus operandi in place conducive to the Charter and a moral
society as per the aspirations attributed to God who is recognized by the Constitution as supreme and the verbiage
of the Charter is consistent with the aspirations attributed to Him where

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental
or physical disability.

It is impossible for you to come to the proper conclusion without thinking for yourself.

These people are professionals at deceit and can manipulate you as well as everyone else as they orchestrate the
whole system in a conspiracy against the moral majority which you know to be fact as statistics continue to show
the rich continue to get richer and the poor continue to get poorer.

So I have offered over and over again information for you all to ponder in hopes it will bring you to your senses
breaking you from the spell cast upon you by the Fiction of the Attorney General.

You must understand the true purpose of law enforcement is to back the Law in support of a moral society
not to back the lawyers in support of an immoral society which they thrive on at the ultimate expense of the
taxpayer to the humongous detriment of every individual of the moral majority.

I can not over emphasize that they will use every method possible to avoid being exposed and any of their laws,
policies whatever, such as the date technically is not consistent with the Constitution in support of the guarantee to
every individual as provided by the Charter and therefore of no force or effect.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

Surely you are aware of the insanity of the investigation you are carrying out in performance of your duty as per the
RCMP Act which was enacted by the conspirators and just as assuredly you know my complaint is not with the 2
subjects of the complaint who were just following orders from the powers that be above.

The evidence is irrefutable that the prominent members of the legal system have refused to act in support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, clear, plain and simple inconsistent with and to the contrary of the
Constitution and the evidence is everywhere in reality as to why.
131
For personal gain and benefit of the people in the upper tier to the humongous detriment of the moral majority
which the Charter is intended to protect every individual equally, guaranteed.

You, as well as Sergeant Roy Steinebach and Insp. Brian Verheul know full well that all Roy and Brian need do is
state they refused to investigate the government corruption and conspiracy because so and so ordered them not to.

Common sense says they would not take on such an investigation without consulting with a superior and likewise
they would not have consulted with their superior without first reviewing the evidence so they could converse
competently on the issues and if they were competent they would know for fact what the evidence supports to be
true.

The evidence clearly shows you are all trained in the manner consistent with the Law Society of Upper Canada to
ignore the evidence as to what it actually proves attentive to find any possible diversionary tactic with particular
mention that so and so and this department and that department all concurred with each other and you see no
further evidence to reverse their decision and on and on like that which of course is all irrelevant and incoherent to
the evidence being consistent with the conspiracy.

I remind you and of course everyone that such tactics are expected and predictable of those cooperating in the
conspiracy and when the Charter Democracy Force web site is made known to the people which irrefutably proves
we are the voice of the people and representatives of the people who can be none other being of the people for the
people in support of their individual guaranteed Charter rights I will ensure each and every one of you who have
chosen to insult my intelligence will be immediately dismissed without benefit of pension and every effort will be
made for restitution.

You have all been provided the evidence and given your positions can not possibly be as ignorant of the evidence as
you would have me believe but are consistent with the Fiction of the Attorney General as referenced in the book by
Jonathan Swainger who made reference to a book by Edmund Morgan who asserted the success of democracy was
dependent on the people believing the people had a voice and the representatives were the people.

Those days are over of fraud and conspiracy against the people with the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982
with the inclusion of the Charter creating the new Charter Democracy guaranteeing every individual rights as
provided and defined in the Charter.

The success of the fraud and conspiracy of the traditional democracy was dependent on the people to willingly
suspend disbelief and I am of the belief they will not willingly suspend their belief that every individual is guaranteed
Charter rights.

Would you believe they will take the law into their own hands?

I guarantee it as the present government personnel are unscrupulously lawless inconsistent with the Constitution
and being of no force or effect as the individuals of the moral majority unite under the banner of the Charter
Democracy Force who will have no problem interpreting the evident coherently conducive to their well being and
safety as guaranteed by THE LAW SUPPORTED by the individuals themselves of the
Charter Democracy Force
You people caught up in the belief as intended by the Fiction of the Attorney General had best give due regard to
the Truth which the evidence unequivocally reveals and is being spread to the people perhaps not as quickly as
desired but it will spread like wild fire once it finds the right hands and the Charter Democracy Force web site gets
published.

Of course every effort is being made by the immoral minority in an attempt to ensure the eventuality doesn’t occur
which is a venture into futility dragging many people with them as they give them unwarranted loyalty answering
the prayers of the Charlatans.

132
Think, revert to COMMON SENSE mode and respect the Law you have sworn to uphold.

Credence must be to that which is least likely to be mistaken by humankind

“A man who has committed a mistake and does not correct it,
is committing another mistake”

A person who has read the Mad Glad mostly Sad ….. WHY? document published on the web site of the
Charter Democracy Force not comprehending the need for an investigation must be Mad which makes me
Sad but Glad they have provided me the irrefutable evidence of their pretended incompetence as they
continue to cooperate with the conspiracy against the individual’s of the moral majority.

There are simply too many WHYS? to not to ask WHY? they have refused to investigate. with the WHY’s
being answered and reiterated over and over again.

The Charter permits you all to believe what you like but when you are caught acting on your beliefs in
defiance of the Law you had best believe your defiance is on a collision course with the Wrath of the Law
as supported by the members of the Charter Democracy Force.

I have included a copy of the e-mail addresses which continues to grow and eventually one will turn
leaving the multitude high and dry.

We will get to see where the archbishop@archtoronto.org stands newly added to the list.

As always
Frank Gallagher

PS
Almost forgot.

I asked you if the RCMP upper echelon have been instructing you and you responded no offering they just
forwarded you a message reminding you that a status report was due initiating your 30 day report to me
January 23 2008 just 16 days after your previous status report dated January 7 2008 which was still on
your desk January 8 2008 when I inquired about being more than three weeks late as I understood it to be
due on or about December 16 2007 as detailed in previous documents.
You went on to say the reason this one was so early is because the other one was so late which I suppose
makes sense to you people as you stated this was to put you back on the correct 30 day schedule being 30
days from the due date of the initial 30 day status report which would mean the second 30 day status report
was due January 16 2008 making the second one dated January 23 2008 also late

I requested this matter and others to be clarified by the Commissioner and Insp. Pierre Leduc in the
document “The End of Government Organized Crime January 28 2008” but they remain ambiguous.

It is imperative that you demonstrate a competent ability to address the issues no matter how small they
may appear to you for the principal issue which will be eventually addressed by you can expect to be
severely flawed built on many small flaws pertinent to the issues which will culminate into one huge
flawed report incoherent to the facts creating many inane arguments which must be needlessly addressed
except for the incompetence demonstrated due to inattentiveness.

133
You mentioned that I stated in the “The End of Government Organized Crime January 28 2008”
document that someone should be assigned to this investigation full time and informed me that you were
over 60 people and had plenty of other cases that you had to deal with in daily routine.

For the record once again I state due the very serious nature of the issues regarding the well being and
safety of the people as guaranteed to every individual by the Charter due the obvious conspiracy the
evidence irrefutably proves and the prodigious amount of evidence which requires full undivided
concentration to keep your thoughts intact to provide a comprehensive report coherent to all the evidence it
is improbable as you have demonstrated in your early reports.

I am not being picky but attempting to aid you so that your concluding report will be competent and near
flawless indicative of all the facts presented you which will and must conclude precisely what the evidence
irrefutably shows that the Government is Organized Crime personified of corruption and conspiracy
against the individual’s of the moral majority.

I remind you I spent 40 years in legal surveying where each property line reestablished must be in its
original position as originally staked which required going through documents sometimes 150 years old
requiring due regard to that which is legally owned by the surrounding properties turning every stone in
search of evidence, physical or documentary which can allow me to replace the property corners in their
original positions certain there is no evidence that a later survey may produce to rebut my decisions
initiating court action.

I offer this as fact so you know that I am not receptive to anything but facts and fully aware of their
significance in an investigation which you will come to know as we progress to the certain eventuality and
purpose of the Charter Democracy Force.

The sooner you get it the sooner we can move on to the belated Charter Democracy of 26 years.

I must also inform you I have met many people who are not what they would have me believe where
evidence trumps belief.

The following is an excerpt from page 1 of the aforesaid document “The End of Government Organized
Crime January 28 2008”

I am of the presumption this was induced by your superiors Insp. Pierre Leduc and RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot avoiding the issues but reacting to documents Pierre Leduc,Insp January 11 2008.doc, the
Exorism of the Attorney Generals.doc and Responsible for your destiny Jan. 20 2008.doc listed below
which you will find on my web site Charter Democracy Force http://groups.google.com/group/charter-
democracy-force

Lawyer File 14.doc


This column was published in the North Shore News on September 13 2000
Stockwell Day November 3.doc
Stockwell Day November 5 07.doc
Commission RCMP Complaints Dec. 27 2007.doc

134
Stockwell Day January 3 2008.doc
RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Fax RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Pierre Leduc,Insp January 11 2008.doc
the Exorism of the Attorney Generals.doc
Responsible for your destiny Jan. 20 2008.doc

For the record there remain questions unanswered by Insp. Pierre Leduc and RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot as referenced above compromising the integrity of the investigation on hand which I
initiated on November 8 2008 by filing the complaint with the Commission for Public Complaints Against
the RCMP.

You Sgt Bob MacAdam may very well be investigating the complaint against the two subjects but
ultimately it is the responsibility of the RCMP Commissioner to respond to me regarding the complaint
and until the issues are addressed appropriately the final report is unequivocally tainted as was predictable
given the evidence originally provided.

I am quite sure they could keep me busy initiating a complaint upon the integrity of the investigation and
then upon completion a complaint on the integrity of the investigation of the complaint on the integrity of
the investigation on and on until I expire but that would be a venture into superfluity as they continue to
provide evidence of their involvement with the conspiracy where the evidence is already irrefutably
stacked against them with their present actions being consistent with the conspiracy with no semblance to a
competent responsible irreproachable authority of fortitude and conviction expected and required to
support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

You are all flogging a dead horse attempting to cover up that which can not be covered up where the only
positive move in the RCMP defense is to act positively in addressing the issues in an investigation as
demanded of the evidence in support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
All that is being demonstrated is the efficient and effective manner in which the government conspirators
can waste the taxpayer’s money.

That was a long PS initiated to cover some of the BS

Attentiveness to foresight will eliminate predictable needless hindsight

135
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:42 PM
To: 'roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'
Subject: Phone ASAP

February 1, 2008

Attention

Sgt. Roy Steinebach


roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Please forward to

Dear Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam

It is important you phone me immediately upon receipt

905-476-8959

Thank you

Frank Gallagher

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]


Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:47 PM
To: 'webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'
Subject: e-mail address

Hi

Please provide me with Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam’s e-mail address

Thank you

Frank Gallagher

136
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:50 PM
To: 'brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'
Subject:

Hi Brian

Could you please provide me Bob’s e-mail address?

Frank Gallagher

137
February 6 2008

webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Your File 2007-1355445


Complaint 2 RCMP members refused http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
to investigate
Government Organized Crime
Corruption and Conspiracy

Dear Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam

Due the extraordinary circumstances of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy
against the individual’s of the moral majority, which you are presently studying to determine if the 2
RCMP members refusal to investigate were valid, it is predictable you will find for them in favor of the
government conspirators.

After all, the evidence is irrefutable of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy
with the Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day doing his BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and
MORALITY ploy in his November 2 2007 e-mail to me. (Copy can be found in document “Stockwell Day
November 3 2007”).

His assertion the Task Force was the way to go regarding the link to the DOJ to the RCMP Pension Fund
scandal the Standing Committee on Public Accounts was looking into before they were ordered to sit on it
is indicative of their M.O.

A PUBLIC INQUIRY was in order then and remains in order today because the Task Force Report never
addressed the issue of the link to the DOJ proving it was a diversionary tactic of the conspirators which
they are wont to do over and over again everytime they are caught.

It is the DOJ who is behind the Government Organized Crime as admitted by the DOJ, either stated or
implied in their letter dated January 22 2007. (Copy enclosed last page)

It is not necessary to read between the lines, however it is imperative you remain attentive focused on the
issues at hand not being receptive to their persistent deceptive tactics with the chief legal advisor, the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada having full control over the government whose actions
are and have been absolutely irresponsible to the well being and safety of the individual who the Federal
Government guaranteed clear and certain rights as defined in the Charter.

In the “Role of Responsibilities of the Attorney General” which is published on the Ontario Attorney
General web site it is absolutely clear he is responsible for all Constitutional matters regarding the public

138
interest which definitely means as chief legal advisor of the government personnel his ultimate purpose is
to advise them in a manner consistent with the Constitution conducive to the public interest which is
ultimately the individuals and their guaranteed Charter rights.

On paper it is one and the same with one single purpose where the Attorney General is responsible to
advise the government personnel in structuring a legal system consistent with the Constitution conducive
to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where every individual is equal entitled to equal protection
and benefits in all matters before and under the Law.

That includes him and every government person having no more or no less in these matters.

That is not what the DOJ would have us believe which is consistent with his M.O. as demonstrated in the
Jonathan Swainger book.

I am aware that the book could be considered fiction but the preponderance of evidence persistently
consistent with the book is not fiction proving the contents of his book non fiction which of course wasn’t
the objective of my initiatives however the book supports the irrefutable evidence of the Government
Organized Crime as does the words “BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY” of
Confucius 2500 years ago.

It simply couldn’t be clearer where my actions are all consistent with the Constitution conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and all the actions and non actions of the government are consistent
with the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s of the moral
majority.

I reiterate the individual’s Charter guarantee is evidenced by the Constitution Act, 1982 which was enacted
by the Federal Government being the grantors of the guarantee legally binding the Federal Government
personnel to the support of the guarantee upon acceptance of financial benefit.

Excuse the pun but they have made a Federal Case out of issues which are fundamental to the Constitution
and the well being and safety of the individual’s of the moral majority

The evidence is irrefutable the Federal Government refuse to back the individual’s Charter guarantee and
they clearly demonstrate their attitude, convictions and beliefs are that of the DOJ and logically so as the
Minister is their chief legal advisor but that does not relieve them of their responsibility to know and
comply with the law any more than any individual of the public who goes through life without the benefit
of free legal advisors as they carry on business of either financial or personal purpose.

You would have to admit the government worker has a huge advantage over the public individuals who not
only do not have free legal advisors but they contribute to the financing of their free legal advice.

Surely you must see the importance that we are all obliged to comply with the Law and all advice must be
consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

That is incumbent upon the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada to issue advice to all the
government personnel consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights which are equal and one in the same.

139
An individual may act on the advice of his or her lawyer but ultimately the public individual suffers the
consequences

When the Government personnel act on the advice of the chief legal advisor ultimately the public
individual’s suffer the consequences.

What’s wrong with this picture?


Obviously it is not consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
where every individual is guaranteed equality as in

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical
disability.

The success of the moral society is dependent on every individual of both the public and private sectors
being coherent to the law complying with it in one interpretation which is ultimately the responsibility of
the DOJ under the leadership of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General as clearly defined in the
“Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General”

Clearly the evidence which I have gathered in my personal trek for justice irrefutably proves the
administration and enforcement of the Constitution under the advice of the Federal and Ontario Attorney
General has no resemblance to that which is required and demanded by the Constitution where the
government personnel must be competent, responsible irreproachable people of fortitude and conviction to
the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

My intentions were never to ask for advice from any government personnel to deal with my personal issues
as my initiatives were to find a legitimate government person to administer and enforce the Law consistent
with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which could not be found due
to their loyalty and confidence in the Attorney General’s advice due their nature and habit where
Confucius states
“Men’s natures are alike; it is their habits that carry them far apart” and I state
“Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to
perception”
The government personnel are human as are we all being similar in nature requiring identical necessities to
sustain life in Canada under the authority of the Constitution Act, 1982: Document where the habits
of the government personnel whose perceptions have been highly influenced led by the Minister of the
DOJ having carried them far apart from the LAW and the habits of the moral majority who are intent and
vie to comply with the Law.

Reality is precisely due to the government personnel’s perceptions which I am living and documenting
which is impervious to perception as the evidence is irrefutable to that which is the reality of the
Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy against the moral majority whose perceptions
have been befuddled by their beliefs, trust and faith the system is legal consistent with the Constitution.

As I say, reality is the truth impervious to perception where the evidence lay in perpetual state published
on my web sites waiting for the reality guaranteed by the Charter as the evidence is perused by the
140
individual’s of the moral majority who by moral habit will know certain the habits of the government
personnel are not consistent with the Constitution highly detrimental to their safety and well being as
guaranteed by the Charter leaving the conspirators without a leg to stand on but necks to hang by.

Purportedly hanging is illegal in Canada but we must consider the fact an illegitimate unscrupulous
government made laws inconsistent with the Constitution where

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

Well after the hangings we can sort that out in due course.

Surely the government personnel understand as individual’s of the moral majority live in poverty, starving,
in prison attempting to survive, lay suffering waiting for a hospital bed due their neglect to provide them
the care they needed and dieing for similar cause as they persist in their evil habits illegitimately advised
by the DOJ under the leadership of the Minister.

Realities are predictable when you have full grasp of it and to that endeavor I provide all of you the evidence in a
timely manner to prevent the predictable impervious to perception.

You all have brains and know full well every person has a unique perception but in matters of every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights consistent with the Constitution where
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal
benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or
ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability
we must all be of one perception in our actions where every individual must comply or be punished with emphasis
attentive to deterrence to prevent the predictable in pursuant of a failsafe modus operandi capable to support every
individuals equal rights of protection and benefits in all matters before and under the law as guaranteed by the
Federal Government where the evidence clearly shows it is the responsibility of the DOJ under the leadership of the
Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada and the Attorney General’s of the provinces.

The evidence clearly shows the Office of the DOJ has led the government personnel in habits taking them far apart
from the Constitution and the individual’s of the moral majority where the Minister is responsible for all
Constitutional matters ensuring the government personnel act consistent with the Constitution conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which ultimately means the government and legal system which has been
financed in it’s entirety by the people who are obliged to be moral in compliance with the law, where every
individual must act consistent with the law conducive to every individual’s guaranteed equal rights without
discrimination.

Everyone is presumed innocent until their actions give them away.

The letter on page 10 from the DOJ dated January 22 2007 is conclusive proof the Office of the Minister of Justice
and Attorney General of Canada is intent on having the individual’s believe the structured legal system financed by
the people under the authority of the Constitution Act,1982 which guarantees the individual’s Charter rights was
structured for his personnel perception and use as he advises all the government personnel contrary to his authority
granted by the Constitution inconsistent with the spirit of the law not conducive to the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights.

When he is confronted with the issues he misuses the authority to have me believe he can not get involved
suggesting I am looking for legal advice and can not get involved.

141
He knows damn well this is not a personal issue requesting legal advice from a crook and is in fact advice to him to
act in compliance with the law consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights which he refuses to do as he is seriously self inflicted with the Fiction of the Attorney General.

The legal system is not for his personal use and he must be immediately informed of his former responsibilities as he
is read his rights under the authority of the Constitution.

The letter on page 10 is clear and present evidence the DOJ under the leadership of the Minister has clearly
proven they are indiscriminate in their discrimination against the individual’s of the moral majority as they
state the Minister is the chief adviser of the government inferring they have a different responsibility than
that of every individual of the public having an attitude which is in conflict of interest of every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights.

Attention Mary Elizabeth Dawson Commissioner of Conflict of Interest and Ethics

Once again I bring this to your attention.

Of course you are in a daunting predicament and the Minister of the DOJ will continue to advise you to
cooperate with his conspiracy against the Constitution and the moral majority.

You have been informed, provided the irrefutable evidence and know full well to date you have been
cooperating with the conspiracy which the evidence irrefutably proves.

You have the evidence, the law and the job to do in support of the people who will indeed support you if
you act appropriately.

Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam

School’s out. Read the Minister his rights

Frank Gallagher

Minister of Public Safety Note: This e-mail was sent November 2 2007 and I
Ministre de a Sécurité publique responded to it in the document “Stockwell Day
Ottawa, Canada K1A 0P8 November 3 2007” which included a copy of it.
OCT 2 g 2007
Also note that Stockwll Day has been provided all the
Mr. Frank Gallagher evidence published on my web sites and has been
frank.gaIIaghersympatico.ca provided the web site addresses along with all the
prominent members of the government on the e-mail
Dear Mr. Gallagher: list enclosed

Thank you for your correspondence of July 19, 2007, regarding the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
(RCMP) pension fund as well as your concerns that rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms are not being protected. I apologize for the delay in responding.
As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must
ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions and the fundamental
rights and freedoms of Canadians.

142
The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is taking action to
ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner. In order to deliver on its commitment to
make Government more accountable, on April 11, 2006, Canada’s new Government introduced the
Federal Accountability Act, which received Royal Assent on December 12, 2006. Through this Act, the
Government of Canada has introduced specific measures to help strengthen accountability and increase
transparency and oversight in Government operations. To clarify roles and responsibilities, the Federal
Accountability Act designates Deputy Ministers and Deputy Heads such as the Commissioner of the
RCMP as accounting officers who are accountable before the appropriate committee of Parliament to
answer questions related to their responsibilities.
Canada
-2-
The RCMP is an important national institution that plays a significant role in the safety and security of
Canadians; ensuring public trust and confidence is an important component of achieving that role.
Canada’s new Government has taken a number of recent steps in respect of this important national
institution.
On April 13, 2007, Mr. David Brown was appointed to lead an independent investigation into allegations
relating to the RCMP pension and insurance plans. The mandate for this investigation gave Mr. Brown the
flexibility to recommend whether a more formal inquiry was necessary to address any outstanding
questions. In his report, submitted to the Government on June 15, 2007, Mr. Brown recommended that no
formal inquiry was necessary. I have closely reviewed Mr. Brown’s report and have accepted all of his
recommendations.
On July 16, 2007, the Government announced the creation of a five-member Task Force on Governance
and Cultural Change in the RCMP, to be chaired by Mr. David Brown. In addition to the appointment of
Mr. Brown as Chair, Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman Inkster, and Larry Murray — each with varied
expertise and experience — have been appointed as members of the Task Force. The Task Force will make
recommendations to improve management and accountability within the RCMP, and will report back to
the Government by the end of 2007.
Furthermore, the appointment of William J.S. Elliott as the new Commissioner of the RCMP, with a career
that has been marked with distinction as well as expertise in the area of national security, will provide the
RCMP with the renewed leadership that it critically needs at this time.
With respect to the criminal allegations under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 mentioned in your letter,
please note that criminal matters in Ontario fall within the purview of the Honourable Michael Bryant,
Attorney General of Ontario. You may therefore wish to raise your concerns with his office, using the
contact information provided below:
Ministry of the Attorney General
McMurtry-Scott Building
720 Bay Street, 11th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K1
Telephone: 416-326-2220

-3-
With respect to your concerns about the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, I
have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your correspondence to my colleague the Honourable Rob
Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, for his information and consideration. In
addition, a copy of your correspondence has been forwarded to Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Conflict of
Interest and Ethics Commissioner.
I regret that I cannot help in the way you had perhaps hoped, but wish you well in resolving your concerns.
Yours sincerely,

143
c.c.: The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C.
Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner
Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety

pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; attorneygeneral@jus.gov.on.ca;garth@garth.ca; Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca;


webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
Primetimecrime@gmail.com; webadmin@greenparty.ca; info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org;
edmonton@cba-alberta.org; cba@bccba.org; admin@cbanb.com; cba-nl@nl.rogers.com;
cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca; cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-pei@isn.net; cba.sk@sasktel.net;
cbayukon@internorth.com; ciec-ccie@parl.gc.ca; ndpaoatlantic@ns.aliantzinc.ca; information@forces.gc.ca;
ndpao-pacific@shaw.ca; ndpaocal@nucleus.com; NDPAO@bellnet.ca; ndpao.mtl@videotron.ca;
webmaster@forces.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca;
Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca; ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca; ayala_disadvantage@hotmail.com; admin@otla.com;
atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca; anguswd@sen.parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca;
bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;
bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca; bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; bob.runciman@pc.ola.org; bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org;
bergeron_hater_1976@hotmail.com; buoyantly.ewing_1977@hotmail.com; BelleG@parl.gc.ca; complaints@cpc-
cpp.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
bentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; communications@ps.gc.ca; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
christine.elliott@pc.ola.org; city@thestar.ca;galipfoundation@earthlink.net;

citydesk@tor.sunpub.com; comail@lsuc.ca; cgrech@yrng.com; copelandj@scc-csc.gc.ca;


cdavis@relevantknowledge.com; Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca; charrf@sen.parl.gc.ca; coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca;
cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca; chapum@sen.parl.gc.ca; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca;
carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca; campbel@sen.parl.gc.ca; callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca; dwatch@web.net;
dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org; dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca;

144
debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca; dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca; dinovoc-qp@ndp.on.ca;
dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca; dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com; dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca;
damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca; egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca;
editor@tor.sunpub.com; ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org; elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;
dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com; dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca; damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; editor@tor.sunpub.com;
editor@rd.ca;; francois-giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca; fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca; frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca; fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca;gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;
goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca; grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca;
htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca; hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca;
horton@adlib.ca; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; info@chfc.ca; info@olderwomensnetwork.org; info@ocsj.ca; info@cjc-
ccm.gc.ca; info@ohrc.on.ca; info@libertarian.ca; justice@socialjustice.org; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca;

jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; julia.munroco@pc.ola.org; jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca; jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca;


johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca; jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca;
Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca;
kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca; kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca; lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca; lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;
losier@sen.parl.gc.ca; lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca; licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; Lussier.M@parl.gc.ca;
Lake.M@parl.gc.ca;Laforest.J@parl.gc.ca;mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca;MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca;
mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;
massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca; mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;
merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca; milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca; mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca;
munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca; mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;
McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;nimhinfo@nih.gov; nejmcust@mms.org; prevention@ps.gc.ca; communications@ps.gc.ca;
mcknight.pycnodont@hotmail.com; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca; mphelps@otla.com; Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca;
nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca; ocap@tao.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;
Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca; pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca;
pkormos-qp@ndp.on.ca; prevention@ps.gc.ca; prognosticatingw371@mobilemessage.com; pwang@adni.net;

PoiliP@parl.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;


randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca; russem@sen.parl.gc.ca;
rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca; rattel@sen.parl.gc.ca; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;
spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca;
smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca; smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca; sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca; spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;
stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca; szwebmaster@yahoo.com;
support@besthotfilms.com; Symantec@reply.digitalriver.com; swainger@unbc.ca; Sweet.D@parl.gc.ca;
terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca;
tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca; tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca; victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca;
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; vanlop1@parl.gc.ca; vanlop0@parl.gc.ca; webadmin@justice.gc.ca;
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; web@ps.gc.ca;
willis@forces.gc.ca; Williams.J@parl.gc.ca; Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca;
philreporter1989@yahoo.ca;editor@philreporter.com; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; info@vivelecanada.ca; nphlstatistician@hotmail.com;
press@transparency.org;ti-can@transparency.ca; askgov@worldbank.org, sprayriver@yahoo.ca;
newsroom@globeandmail.com; news@citynews.ca; newsdesk@metronews.ca;
admin@georginaadvocate.com; admin@stouffvillesun.com; archbishop@archtoronto.org

145
There goes my willingness to suspend the disbelief and
time for the government to collapse.

The Attorney General’s Office has clearly admitted the


Attorney General is the Government’s chief legal
adviser not being representative of the people.

The issues which I have addressed on my web site


were derived from first hand knowledge of my attempt
to find justice consistent with the Charter and they say I
am on my own and get a lawyer if I think I can afford a
long inane battle against them as they use all the
resources of the government where all the personnel are
advised by him against the people who finance them,
including me who has paid his fair share..

146
February 2, 2008

To

webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Telephone conversation yesterday at about 5:30 PM

Having not heard from you Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam in response to my e-mail directed to you through the
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca address with “The End of Government Organized Crime January 28
2008” document attached I fired off three e-mails around 3 PM yesterday (copies enclosed) to see if
anyone from the RCMP would cooperate with me.
At about 5:30 PM yesterday you phoned me as requested and I asked if you had received the e-mail I sent and you
responded you just got it requesting I phone you. I asked who you got the message from and you stated Roy
Steinebach.

The other two messages requested your e-mail address but I have not yet received it, not even from you.

During the 15-20 minute conversation you informed me that you had received the other e-mails I had sent through
the webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca address and I asked why you had not responded to the “The End of
Government Organized Crime January 28 2008” document and you replied that you are only required
to address the evident provided in the original complaint when I said given the seriousness of the issues I
would think you would want all the help you can get and it was you who had asked me for help
deciphering the evidence, during our telephone conversation of January 8 2008.
I went on to say you had not mentioned the Charter Democracy Force web site in your recent letter January
23 2008 and I wanted to make sure you received it as stated in the “The End of Government Organized
Crime January 28 2008”.

You asked if the evidence on the Charter Democracy Force web site is that which was provided to Sgt.
Steinebach which my mother witnessed and I said yes, it was the same information which I had printed out
being about 7 inches thick and taken to the RCMP October 18 2007.

Sgt. Steinebach had stated that he had all the documents which I had been sending to the Michael
Thomson RCMP Milton e-mail address and went on to say they had opened a file for all the e-mails I have
been sending, which goes back to January 2006.

I continued to use this e-mail address long after he declined to investigate on October 18 2007 and the
filing of the complaint on November 8 2007 with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the
RCMP.

Sometime after the filing of the complaint I noticed the Michael Thomson RCMP Milton e-mail address
was rejecting my e-mails so I acquired the e-mail addresses of Sgt Roy Steinebach of the Newmarket

147
detachment and Insp. Brian Verhuel of the Milton detachment through the webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
address and have provided them my Charter Democracy Force web site and continued to provide them
with all the e-mails I send to the rest of the pertinent government personnel whose e-mail addresses can be
found on the said web site under link to document AAAAAAAAAAList

So the fact is all the evidence found on my Charter Democracy Force web site has been provided to them
to date and will continue until their web sites reject the evidence which would possibly be considered
obstruction of justice and an attempt to cover up the conspiracy, whether or not the RCMP attempt to bring
up the technicality of the November 8 2007 date of the filing of the complaint which stated evidence to be
found on web sites
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms

These sites are still pertinent to the requested investigation of the Government corruption and conspiracy
which the subject RCMP members declined to investigate and the new web site Charter Democracy
Force was created in a semblance to order to make it easier to comprehend for both you and my other
reluctant readers and most importantly the PUBLIC who would not be so reluctant.

Under the circumstances it would be inane and considered just another ploy to cover up the Government
Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy against the people if you were not to deal with all the
evidence provided you.

If you don’t it would be a humungous waste of tax payers money for me to file another complaint adding the
evidence which you decline to look at due to a date technicality relative to the complaint against the two subjects
when they continue to decline to investigate to this day having been provided the evidence to date.

The majority of the material filed, if not all since the filing of the complaint has been published to aid you and the
others in your thinking which has been befuddled due to the conspirators who have failed to restructure the legal
system to that required and demanded by the Constitution Act, 1982 in support and conducive to the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees every individual certain rights as provided by the Charter.

Once again I inform you

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

It is imperative to the investigation that you comprehend the meaning of this.

I have consistently, persistently reiterated upon reiteration over and over again that you people of the RCMP and
others in the legal system, including lawyers have all been taught and trained in a system designed by the
prominent members of the conspiracy which is ultimately headed by the Office of the Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada whereas all you people involved with the legal system, get your experience and
knowledge handed down from your superiors and associates which was handed down from the conspirators since
1982.

You must be able to think sanely with open mind to that which I have reiterated so many times using good old
COMMON SENSE and COMMON LAW consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982 conducive to the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the
rule of law.

The Federal Government through the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 guaranteed every individual Charter
rights of equal protection and benefits in all matters before and under the law which they are obliged to support as

148
well as anyone else providing a guarantee such as a car company which would go under if they didn’t back the
guarantee.

This present government system will go under likewise as the word gets out and that is the guarantee and purpose
of the Charter Democracy Force of the people for the people which the evidence irrefutably proves the government
and legal system has been structured through the confiscation of the taxpayers’ money for the benefit of the
conspirators and their affluent and influential associates creating a two tier system to the humongous detriment of
the moral majority.

The evidence shows all the government personnel who have responded to the issues have acted peculiarly
incompetent, incoherent to the evidence consistent with the M.O. of the Law Society of Upper Canada who are of
the “Mightier than thou and the Law…don’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights attitude”
who have no use for evidence in concluding their predetermined decisions as to whether or not any of their
members are guilty of a complaint filed against them.

If the governments and the legal system personnel were competent, responsible and irreproachable people of
fortitude and conviction to the support of the guarantee which is demanded and required to back such a guarantee
they would be able to demonstrate they have a modus operandi in place conducive to the Charter and a moral
society as per the aspirations attributed to God who is recognized by the Constitution as supreme and the verbiage
of the Charter is consistent with the aspirations attributed to Him where

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental
or physical disability.

It is impossible for you to come to the proper conclusion without thinking for yourself.

These people are professionals at deceit and can manipulate you as well as everyone else as they orchestrate the
whole system in a conspiracy against the moral majority which you know to be fact as statistics continue to show
the rich continue to get richer and the poor continue to get poorer.

So I have offered over and over again information for you all to ponder in hopes it will bring you to your senses
breaking you from the spell cast upon you by the Fiction of the Attorney General.

You must understand the true purpose of law enforcement is to back the Law in support of a moral society
not to back the lawyers in support of an immoral society which they thrive on at the ultimate expense of the
taxpayer to the humongous detriment of every individual of the moral majority.

I can not over emphasize that they will use every method possible to avoid being exposed and any of their laws,
policies whatever, such as the date technically is not consistent with the Constitution in support of the guarantee to
every individual as provided by the Charter and therefore of no force or effect.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

Surely you are aware of the insanity of the investigation you are carrying out in performance of your duty as per the
RCMP Act which was enacted by the conspirators and just as assuredly you know my complaint is not with the 2
subjects of the complaint who were just following orders from the powers that be above.

The evidence is irrefutable that the prominent members of the legal system have refused to act in support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, clear, plain and simple inconsistent with and to the contrary of the
Constitution and the evidence is everywhere in reality as to why.
149
For personal gain and benefit of the people in the upper tier to the humongous detriment of the moral majority
which the Charter is intended to protect every individual equally, guaranteed.

You, as well as Sergeant Roy Steinebach and Insp. Brian Verheul know full well that all Roy and Brian need do is
state they refused to investigate the government corruption and conspiracy because so and so ordered them not to.

Common sense says they would not take on such an investigation without consulting with a superior and likewise
they would not have consulted with their superior without first reviewing the evidence so they could converse
competently on the issues and if they were competent they would know for fact what the evidence supports to be
true.

The evidence clearly shows you are all trained in the manner consistent with the Law Society of Upper Canada to
ignore the evidence as to what it actually proves attentive to find any possible diversionary tactic with particular
mention that so and so and this department and that department all concurred with each other and you see no
further evidence to reverse their decision and on and on like that which of course is all irrelevant and incoherent to
the evidence being consistent with the conspiracy.

I remind you and of course everyone that such tactics are expected and predictable of those cooperating in the
conspiracy and when the Charter Democracy Force web site is made known to the people which irrefutably proves
we are the voice of the people and representatives of the people who can be none other being of the people for the
people in support of their individual guaranteed Charter rights I will ensure each and every one of you who have
chosen to insult my intelligence will be immediately dismissed without benefit of pension and every effort will be
made for restitution.

You have all been provided the evidence and given your positions can not possibly be as ignorant of the evidence as
you would have me believe but are consistent with the Fiction of the Attorney General as referenced in the book by
Jonathan Swainger who made reference to a book by Edmund Morgan who asserted the success of democracy was
dependent on the people believing the people had a voice and the representatives were the people.

Those days are over of fraud and conspiracy against the people with the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982
with the inclusion of the Charter creating the new Charter Democracy guaranteeing every individual rights as
provided and defined in the Charter.

The success of the fraud and conspiracy of the traditional democracy was dependent on the people to willingly
suspend disbelief and I am of the belief they will not willingly suspend their belief that every individual is guaranteed
Charter rights.

Would you believe they will take the law into their own hands?

I guarantee it as the present government personnel are unscrupulously lawless inconsistent with the Constitution
and being of no force or effect as the individuals of the moral majority unite under the banner of the Charter
Democracy Force who will have no problem interpreting the evident coherently conducive to their well being and
safety as guaranteed by THE LAW SUPPORTED by the individuals themselves of the
Charter Democracy Force
You people caught up in the belief as intended by the Fiction of the Attorney General had best give due regard to
the Truth which the evidence unequivocally reveals and is being spread to the people perhaps not as quickly as
desired but it will spread like wild fire once it finds the right hands and the Charter Democracy Force web site gets
published.

Of course every effort is being made by the immoral minority in an attempt to ensure the eventuality doesn’t occur
which is a venture into futility dragging many people with them as they give them unwarranted loyalty answering
the prayers of the Charlatans.

150
Think, revert to COMMON SENSE mode and respect the Law you have sworn to uphold.

Credence must be to that which is least likely to be mistaken by humankind

“A man who has committee a mistake and does not correct it,
is committing another mistake”

A person who has read the Mad Glad mostly Sad WHY? document published on the web site of the
Charter Democracy Force not comprehending the need for an investigation must be Mad which makes me
Sad but Glad they have provided me the irrefutable evidence of their pretended incompetence as they
continue to cooperate with the conspiracy against the individual’s of the moral majority.

There are simply too many WHYS? to not to ask WHY? they have refused to investigate.with the WHY’s
being answered and reiterated over and over again.

The Charter permits you all to believe what you like but when you are caught acting on your beliefs in
defiance of the Law you had best believe your defiance is on a collision course with the Wrath of the Law
as supported by the members of the Charter Democracy Force.

I have included a copy of the e-mail addresses which continues to grow and eventually one will turn
leaving the multitude high and dry.

We will get to see where the archbishop@archtoronto.org stands newly added to the list.

As always
Frank Gallagher

PS
Almost forgot.

I asked you if the RCMP upper echelon have been instructing you and you responded no offering they just
forwarded you a message reminding you that a status report was due initiating your 30 day report to me
January 23 2008 just 16 days after your previous status report dated January 7 2008 which was still on
your desk January 8 2008 when I inquired about being more than three weeks late as I understood it to be
due on or about December 16 2007 as detailed in previous documents.
You went on to say the reason this one was so early is because the other one was so late which I suppose
makes sense to you people as you stated this was to put you back on the correct 30 day schedule being 30
days from the due ate of the initial 30 day status report which would mean the second 30 day status report
was due January 16 2008 making the second one dated January 23 2008 also late

I requested this matter and others to be clarified by the Commissioner and Insp. Pierre Leduc in the
document “The End of Government Organized Crime January 28 2008” but they remain ambiguous.

It is imperative that you demonstrate a competent ability to address the issues no matter how small they
may appear to you for the principal issue which will be eventually addressed by you can expect to be
severely flawed built on many small flaws pertinent to the issues which will culminate into one huge
flawed report incoherent to the facts creating many inane arguments which must be needlessly addressed
except for the incompetence demonstrated due to inattentiveness.

151
You mentioned that I stated in the “The End of Government Organized Crime January 28 2008”
document that someone should be assigned to this investigation full time and informed me that you were
over 60 people and had plenty of other cases that you had to deal with in daily routine.

For the record once again I state due the very serious nature of the issues regarding the well being and
safety of the people as guaranteed to every individual by the Charter due the obvious conspiracy the
evidence irrefutably proves and the prodigious amount of evidence which requires full undivided
concentration to keep your thoughts intact to provide a comprehensive report coherent to all the evidence it
is improbable as you have demonstrated in your early reports.

I am not being picky but attempting to aid you so that your concluding report will be competent and near
flawless indicative of all the facts presented you which will and must conclude precisely what the evidence
irrefutably shows that the Government is Organized Crime personified of corruption and conspiracy
against the individual’s of the moral majority.

I remind you I spent 40 years in legal surveying where each property line reestablished must be in its
original position as originally staked which required going through documents sometimes 150 years old
requiring due regard to that which is legally owned by the surrounding properties turning every stone in
search of evidence, physical or documentary which can allow me to replace the property corners in their
original positions certain there is no evidence that a later survey may produce to rebut my decisions
initiating court action.

I offer this as fact so you know that I am not receptive to anything but facts and fully aware of their
significance in an investigation which you will come to know as we progress to the certain eventuality and
purpose of the Charter Democracy Force.

The sooner you get it the sooner we can move on to the belated Charter Democracy of 26 years.

I must also inform you I have met many people who are not what they would have me believe where
evidence trumps belief.

The following is an excerpt from page 1 of the aforesaid document “The End of Government Organized
Crime January 28 2008”

I am of the presumption this was induced by your superiors Insp. Pierre Leduc and RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot avoiding the issues but reacting to documents Pierre Leduc,Insp January 11 2008.doc, the
Exorism of the Attorney Generals.doc and Responsible for your destiny Jan. 20 2008.doc listed below
which you will find on my web site Charter Democracy Force http://groups.google.com/group/charter-
democracy-force

Lawyer File 14.doc


This column was published in the North Shore News on September 13 2000
Stockwell Day November 3.doc
Stockwell Day November 5 07.doc
Commission RCMP Complaints Dec. 27 2007.doc

152
Stockwell Day January 3 2008.doc
RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Fax RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008.doc
Pierre Leduc,Insp January 11 2008.doc
the Exorism of the Attorney Generals.doc
Responsible for your destiny Jan. 20 2008.doc

For the record there remain questions unanswered by Insp. Pierre Leduc and RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot as referenced above compromising the integrity of the investigation on hand which I
initiated on November 8 2008 by filing the complaint with the Commission for Public Complaints Against
the RCMP.

You Sgt Bob MacAdam may very well be investigating the complaint against the two subjects but
ultimately it is the responsibility of the RCMP Commissioner to respond to me regarding the complaint
and until the issues are addressed appropriately the final report is unequivocally tainted as was predictable
given the evidence originally provided.

I am quite sure they could keep me busy initiating a complaint upon the integrity of the investigation and
then upon completion a complaint on the integrity of the investigation of the complaint on the integrity of
the investigation on and on until I expire but that would be a venture into superfluity as they continue to
provide evidence of their involvement with the conspiracy where the evidence is already irrefutably
stacked against them with their present actions being consistent with the conspiracy with no semblance to a
competent responsible irreproachable authority of fortitude and conviction expected and required to
support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

You are all flogging a dead horse attempting to cover up that which can not be covered up where the only
positive move in the RCMP defense is to act positively in addressing the issues in an investigation as
demanded of the evidence in support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
All that is being demonstrated is the efficient and effective manner in which the government conspirators
can waste the taxpayer’s money.

That was a long PS initiated to cover some of the BS

Attentiveness to foresight will eliminate predictable needless hindsight


From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:42 PM
To: 'roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'
Subject: Phone ASAP

February 1, 2008

Attention

Sgt. Roy Steinebach


roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Please forward to

153
Dear Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam

It is important you phone me immediately upon receipt

905-476-8959

Thank you

Frank Gallagher

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]


Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:47 PM
To: 'webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'
Subject: e-mail address

Hi

Please provide me with Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam’s e-mail address

Thank you

Frank Gallagher

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]


Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:50 PM
To: 'brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'
Subject:

Hi Brian

Could you please provide me with Bob’s e-mail address?

154
Frank Gallagher

pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; attorneygeneral@jus.gov.on.ca;garth@garth.ca; Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca;


webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
Primetimecrime@gmail.com; webadmin@greenparty.ca; info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org;
edmonton@cba-alberta.org; cba@bccba.org; admin@cbanb.com; cba-nl@nl.rogers.com;
cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca; cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-pei@isn.net; cba.sk@sasktel.net;
cbayukon@internorth.com; ciec-ccie@parl.gc.ca; ndpaoatlantic@ns.aliantzinc.ca; information@forces.gc.ca;
ndpao-pacific@shaw.ca; ndpaocal@nucleus.com; NDPAO@bellnet.ca; ndpao.mtl@videotron.ca;
webmaster@forces.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca;
Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca; ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca; ayala_disadvantage@hotmail.com; admin@otla.com;
atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca; anguswd@sen.parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca;
bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;
bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca; bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; bob.runciman@pc.ola.org; bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org;
bergeron_hater_1976@hotmail.com; buoyantly.ewing_1977@hotmail.com; BelleG@parl.gc.ca; complaints@cpc-
cpp.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
bentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; communications@ps.gc.ca; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
christine.elliott@pc.ola.org; city@thestar.ca;

citydesk@tor.sunpub.com; comail@lsuc.ca; cgrech@yrng.com; copelandj@scc-csc.gc.ca;


cdavis@relevantknowledge.com; Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca; charrf@sen.parl.gc.ca; coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca;
cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca; chapum@sen.parl.gc.ca; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca;
carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca; campbel@sen.parl.gc.ca; callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca; dwatch@web.net;
dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org; dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca;
debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca; dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca; dinovoc-qp@ndp.on.ca;
dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca; dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com; dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca;
damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca; egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca;
editor@tor.sunpub.com; ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org; elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;
dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com; dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca; damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; editor@tor.sunpub.com;
editor@rd.ca;; francois-giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca; fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca; frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca; fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca;gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;
goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca; grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca;
htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca; hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca;
horton@adlib.ca; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; info@chfc.ca; info@olderwomensnetwork.org; info@ocsj.ca; info@cjc-
ccm.gc.ca; info@ohrc.on.ca; info@libertarian.ca; justice@socialjustice.org; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca;

jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org;julia.munroco@pc.ola.org;jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca;jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca;
johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca;

155
Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca;
kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca; kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca; lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca;lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;
losier@sen.parl.gc.ca;lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca; licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; Lussier.M@parl.gc.ca;
Lake.M@parl.gc.ca;Laforest.J@parl.gc.ca;mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca;MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca;
mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;
massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca; mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;
merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca; milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca; mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca;
munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca; mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;
McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;nimhinfo@nih.gov; nejmcust@mms.org; prevention@ps.gc.ca; communications@ps.gc.ca;
mcknight.pycnodont@hotmail.com; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca; mphelps@otla.com; Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca;
nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca; ocap@tao.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;

Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;


poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca; pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca; pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca; prevention@ps.gc.ca; prognosticatingw371@mobilemessage.com; pwang@adni.net;
PoiliP@parl.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca; russem@sen.parl.gc.ca;
rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca; rattel@sen.parl.gc.ca; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;
spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca;
smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca; smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca; sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca; spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;
stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca; szwebmaster@yahoo.com;
support@besthotfilms.com; Symantec@reply.digitalriver.com; swainger@unbc.ca; Sweet.D@parl.gc.ca;
terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca;
tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca; tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca; victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca;
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; vanlop1@parl.gc.ca; vanlop0@parl.gc.ca; webadmin@justice.gc.ca;
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; web@ps.gc.ca;
willis@forces.gc.ca; Williams.J@parl.gc.ca; Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca;
philreporter1989@yahoo.ca;editor@philreporter.com; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; info@vivelecanada.ca; nphlstatistician@hotmail.com;
press@transparency.org;ti-can@transparency.ca; askgov@worldbank.org, sprayriver@yahoo.ca;
newsroom@globeandmail.com; news@citynews.ca; newsdesk@metronews.ca;
admin@georginaadvocate.com; admin@stouffvillesun.com; archbishop@archtoronto.org

156
February 6 2008

webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Your File 2007-1355445


Complaint 2 RCMP members refused http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
to investigate
Government Organized Crime
Corruption and Conspiracy

Dear Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam

Due the extraordinary circumstances of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy
against the individual’s of the moral majority, which you are presently studying to determine if the 2
RCMP members refusal to investigate were valid, it is predictable you will find for them in favour of the
government conspirators.

After all, the evidence is irrefutable of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy
with the Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day doing his BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and
MORALITY ploy in his November 2 2007 e-mail to me. (Copy can be found in document “Stockwell Day
November 3 2007”).

His assertion the Task Force was the way to go regarding the link to the DOJ to the RCMP Pension Fund
scandal the Standing Committee on Public Accounts was looking into before they were ordered to sit on it
is indicative of their M.O.

A PUBLIC INQUIRY was in order then and remains in order today because the Task Force Report never
addressed the issue of the link to the DOJ proving it was a diversionary tactic of the conspirators which
they are wont to do over and over again every time they are caught.

It is the DOJ who is behind the Government Organized Crime as admitted by the DOJ, either stated or
implied in their letter dated January 22 2007. (Copy enclosed last page)

It is not necessary to read between the lines, however it is imperative you remain attentive focused on the
issues at hand not being receptive to their persistent deceptive tactics with the chief legal advisor, the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada having full control over the government whose actions
are and have been absolutely irresponsible to the well being and safety of the individual who the Federal
Government guaranteed clear and certain rights as defined in the Charter.

In the “Role of Responsibilities of the Attorney General” which is published on the Ontario Attorney
General web site it is absolutely clear he is responsible for all Constitutional matters regarding the public

157
interest which definitely means as chief legal advisor of the government personnel his ultimate purpose is
to advise them in a manner consistent with the Constitution conducive to the public interest which is
ultimately the individuals and their guaranteed Charter rights.

On paper it is one and the same with one single purpose where the Attorney General is responsible to
advise the government personnel in structuring a legal system consistent with the Constitution conducive
to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where every individual is equal entitled to equal protection
and benefits in all matters before and under the Law.

That includes him and every government person having no more or no less in these matters.

That is not what the DOJ would have us believe which is consistent with his M.O. as demonstrated in the
Jonathan Swainger book.

I am aware that the book could be considered fiction but the preponderance of evidence persistently
consistent with the book is not fiction proving the contents of his book non fiction which of course wasn’t
the objective of my initiatives however the book supports the irrefutable evidence of the Government
Organized Crime as does the words “BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY” of
Confucius 2500 years ago.

It simply couldn’t be clearer where my actions are all consistent with the Constitution conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and all the actions and non actions of the government are consistent
with the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s of the moral
majority.

I reiterate the individual’s Charter guarantee is evidenced by the Constitution Act, 1982 which was enacted
by the Federal Government being the grantors of the guarantee legally binding the Federal Government
personnel to the support of the guarantee upon acceptance of financial benefit.

Excuse the pun but they have made a Federal Case out of issues which are fundamental to the Constitution
and the well being and safety of the individual’s of the moral majority

The evidence is irrefutable the Federal Government refuse to back the individual’s Charter guarantee and
they clearly demonstrate their attitude, convictions and beliefs are that of the DOJ and logically so as the
Minister is their chief legal advisor but that does not relieve them of their responsibility to know and
comply with the law any more than any individual of the public who goes through life without the benefit
of free legal advisors as they carry on business of either financial or personal purpose.

You would have to admit the government worker has a huge advantage over the public individuals who not
only do not have free legal advisors but they contribute to the financing of their free legal advice.

Surely you must see the importance that we are all obliged to comply with the Law and all advice must be
consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

That is incumbent upon the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada to issue advice to all the
government personnel consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights which are equal and one in the same.

158
An individual may act on the advice of his or her lawyer but ultimately the public individual suffers the
consequences

When the Government personnel act on the advice of the chief legal advisor ultimately the public
individual’s suffer the consequences.

What’s wrong with this picture?


Obviously it is not consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
where every individual is guaranteed equality as in

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical
disability.

The success of the moral society is dependent on every individual of both the public and private sectors
being coherent to the law complying with it in one interpretation which is ultimately the responsibility of
the DOJ under the leadership of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General as clearly defined in the
“Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General”

Clearly the evidence which I have gathered in my personal trek for justice irrefutably proves the
administration and enforcement of the Constitution under the advice of the Federal and Ontario Attorney
General has no resemblance to that which is required and demanded by the Constitution where the
government personnel must be competent, responsible irreproachable people of fortitude an conviction to
the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

My intentions were never to ask for advice from any government personnel to deal with my personal issues
as my initiatives were to find a legitimate government person to administer and enforce the Law consistent
with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which could not be found due
to their loyalty and confidence in the Attorney General’s advice due their nature and habit where
Confucius states
“Men’s natures are alike; it is their habits that carry them far apart” and I state
“Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet is precisely due to
perception”
The government personnel are human as are we all being similar in nature requiring identical necessities to
sustain life in Canada under the authority of the Constitution Act, 1982: Document where the habits
of the government personnel whose perceptions have been highly influenced led by the Minister of the
DOJ having carried them far apart from the LAW and the habits of the moral majority who are intent and
vie to comply with the Law.

Reality is precisely due to the government personnel’s perceptions which I am living and documenting
which is impervious to perception as the evidence is irrefutable to that which is the reality of the
Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy against the moral majority whose perceptions
have been befuddled by their beliefs, trust and faith the system is legal consistent with the Constitution.

As I say, reality is the truth impervious to perception where the evidence lay in perpetual state published
on my web sites waiting for the reality guaranteed by the Charter as the evidence is perused by the
159
individual’s of the moral majority who by moral habit will know certain the habits of the government
personnel are not consistent with the Constitution highly detrimental to their safety and well being as
guaranteed by the Charter leaving the conspirators without a leg to stand on but necks to hang by.

Purportedly hanging is illegal in Canada but we must consider the fact an illegitimate unscrupulous
government made laws inconsistent with the Constitution where

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

Well after the hangings we can sort that out in due course.

Surely the government personnel understand as individual’s of the moral majority live in poverty, starving,
in prison attempting to survive, lay suffering waiting for a hospital bed due their neglect to provide them
the care they needed and dieing for similar cause as they persist in their evil habits illegitimately advised
by the DOJ under the leadership of the Minister.

Realities are predictable when you have full grasp of it and to that endeavor I provide all of you the evidence in a
timely manner to prevent the predictable impervious to perception.

You all have brains and know full well every person has a unique perception but in matters of every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights consistent with the Constitution where
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal
benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or
ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability
we must all be of one perception in our actions where every individual must comply or be punished with emphasis
attentive to deterrence to prevent the predictable in pursuant of a failsafe modus operandi capable to support every
individuals equal rights of protection and benefits in all matters before and under the law as guaranteed by the
Federal Government where the evidence clearly shows it is the responsibility of the DOJ under the leadership of the
Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada and the Attorney General’s of the provinces.

The evidence clearly shows the Office of the DOJ has led the government personnel in habits taking them far apart
from the Constitution and the individual’s of the moral majority where the Minister is responsible for all
Constitutional matters ensuring the government personnel act consistent with the Constitution conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which ultimately means the government and legal system which has been
financed in it’s entirety by the people who are obliged to be moral in compliance with the law, where every
individual must act consistent with the law conducive to every individual’s guaranteed equal rights without
discrimination.

Everyone is presumed innocent until their actions give them away.

The letter on page 10 from the DOJ dated January 22 2007 is conclusive proof the Office of the Minister of Justice
and Attorney General of Canada is intent on having the individual’s believe the structured legal system financed by
the people under the authority of the Constitution Act,1982 which guarantees the individual’s Charter rights was
structured for his personnel perception and use as he advises all the government personnel contrary to his authority
granted by the Constitution inconsistent with the spirit of the law not conducive to the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights.

When he is confronted with the issues he misuses the authority to have me believe he can not get involved
suggesting I am looking for legal advice and can not get involved.

160
He knows damn well this is not a personal issue requesting legal advice from a crook and is in fact advice to him to
act in compliance with the law consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights which he refuses to do as he is seriously self inflicted with the Fiction of the Attorney General.

The legal system is not for his personal use and he must be immediately informed of his former responsibilities as he
is read his rights under the authority of the Constitution.

The letter on page 10 is clear and present evidence the DOJ under the leadership of the Minister has clearly
proven they are indiscriminate in their discrimination against the individual’s of the moral majority as they
state the Minister is the chief adviser of the government inferring they have a different responsibility than
that of every individual of the public having an attitude which is in conflict of interest of every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights.

Attention Mary Elizabeth Dawson Commissioner of Conflict of Interest and Ethics

Once again I bring this to your attention.

Of course you are in a daunting predicament and the Minister of the DOJ will continue to advise you to
cooperate with his conspiracy against the Constitution and the moral majority.

You have been informed, provided the irrefutable evidence and know full well to date you have been
cooperating with the conspiracy which the evidence irrefutably proves.

You have the evidence, the law and the job to do in support of the people who will indeed support you if
you act appropriately.

Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam

School’s out. Read the Minister his rights

Frank Gallagher

161
Minister of Public Safety Note: This e-mail was sent November 2 2007 and I
Ministre de a Sécurité publique responded to it in the document “Stockwell Day
Ottawa, Canada K1A 0P8 November 3 2007” which included a copy of it.
OCT 2 g 2007
Also note that Stockwll Day has been provided all the
Mr. Frank Gallagher evidence published on my web sites and has been
frank.gaIIaghersympatico.ca provided the web site addresses along with all the
prominent members of the government on the e-mail
Dear Mr. Gallagher: list enclosed

Thank you for your correspondence of July 19, 2007, regarding the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
(RCMP) pension fund as well as your concerns that rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms are not being protected. I apologize for the delay in responding.
As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must
ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions and the fundamental
rights and freedoms of Canadians.

The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is taking action to
ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner. In order to deliver on its commitment to
make Government more accountable, on April 11, 2006, Canada’s new Government introduced the
Federal Accountability Act, which received Royal Assent on December 12, 2006. Through this Act, the
Government of Canada has introduced specific measures to help strengthen accountability and increase
transparency and oversight in Government operations. To clarify roles and responsibilities, the Federal
Accountability Act designates Deputy Ministers and Deputy Heads such as the Commissioner of the
RCMP as accounting officers who are accountable before the appropriate committee of Parliament to
answer questions related to their responsibilities.
Canada
-2-
The RCMP is an important national institution that plays a significant role in the safety and security of
Canadians; ensuring public trust and confidence is an important component of achieving that role.
Canada’s new Government has taken a number of recent steps in respect of this important national
institution.
On April 13, 2007, Mr. David Brown was appointed to lead an independent investigation into allegations
relating to the RCMP pension and insurance plans. The mandate for this investigation gave Mr. Brown the
flexibility to recommend whether a more formal inquiry was necessary to address any outstanding
questions. In his report, submitted to the Government on June 15, 2007, Mr. Brown recommended that no
formal inquiry was necessary. I have closely reviewed Mr. Brown’s report and have accepted all of his
recommendations.
On July 16, 2007, the Government announced the creation of a five-member Task Force on Governance
and Cultural Change in the RCMP, to be chaired by Mr. David Brown. In addition to the appointment of
Mr. Brown as Chair, Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman Inkster, and Larry Murray — each with varied
expertise and experience — have been appointed as members of the Task Force. The Task Force will make
recommendations to improve management and accountability within the RCMP, and will report back to
the Government by the end of 2007.
Furthermore, the appointment of William J.S. Elliott as the new Commissioner of the RCMP, with a career
that has been marked with distinction as well as expertise in the area of national security, will provide the
RCMP with the renewed leadership that it critically needs at this time.
With respect to the criminal allegations under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 mentioned in your letter,
please note that criminal matters in Ontario fall within the purview of the Honourable Michael Bryant,

162
Attorney General of Ontario. You may therefore wish to raise your concerns with his office, using the
contact information provided below:
Ministry of the Attorney General
McMurtry-Scott Building
720 Bay Street, 11th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K1
Telephone: 416-326-2220

-3-
With respect to your concerns about the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, I
have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your correspondence to my colleague the Honourable Rob
Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, for his information and consideration. In
addition, a copy of your correspondence has been forwarded to Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Conflict of
Interest and Ethics Commissioner.
I regret that I cannot help in the way you had perhaps hoped, but wish you well in resolving your concerns.
Yours sincerely,
c.c.: The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C.
Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner
Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety

pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; attorneygeneral@jus.gov.on.ca;garth@garth.ca; Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca;


webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
Primetimecrime@gmail.com; webadmin@greenparty.ca; info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org;
edmonton@cba-alberta.org; cba@bccba.org; admin@cbanb.com; cba-nl@nl.rogers.com;
cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca; cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-pei@isn.net; cba.sk@sasktel.net;
cbayukon@internorth.com; ciec-ccie@parl.gc.ca; ndpaoatlantic@ns.aliantzinc.ca; information@forces.gc.ca;
ndpao-pacific@shaw.ca; ndpaocal@nucleus.com; NDPAO@bellnet.ca; ndpao.mtl@videotron.ca;
webmaster@forces.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca;
Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca; ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca; ayala_disadvantage@hotmail.com; admin@otla.com;
atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca; anguswd@sen.parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca;
bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;
bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca; bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; bob.runciman@pc.ola.org; bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org;
bergeron_hater_1976@hotmail.com; buoyantly.ewing_1977@hotmail.com; BelleG@parl.gc.ca; complaints@cpc-
cpp.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
bentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; communications@ps.gc.ca; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
christine.elliott@pc.ola.org; city@thestar.ca;galipfoundation@earthlink.net;

citydesk@tor.sunpub.com; comail@lsuc.ca; cgrech@yrng.com; copelandj@scc-csc.gc.ca;


cdavis@relevantknowledge.com; Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca; charrf@sen.parl.gc.ca; coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca;
cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca; chapum@sen.parl.gc.ca; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca;
carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca; campbel@sen.parl.gc.ca; callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca; dwatch@web.net;
dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org; dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca;
debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca; dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca; dinovoc-qp@ndp.on.ca;
dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca; dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com; dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca;
damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca; egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca;
editor@tor.sunpub.com; ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org; elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;
dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com; dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca; damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; editor@tor.sunpub.com;
editor@rd.ca;; francois-giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca; fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca; frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca; fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca;gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;

163
gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;
goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca; grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca;
htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca; hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca;
horton@adlib.ca; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; info@chfc.ca; info@olderwomensnetwork.org; info@ocsj.ca; info@cjc-
ccm.gc.ca; info@ohrc.on.ca; info@libertarian.ca; justice@socialjustice.org; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca;

jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; julia.munroco@pc.ola.org; jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca; jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca;


johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca; jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca;
Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca;
kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca; kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca; lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca; lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;
losier@sen.parl.gc.ca; lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca; licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; Lussier.M@parl.gc.ca;
Lake.M@parl.gc.ca;Laforest.J@parl.gc.ca;mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca;MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca;
mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;
massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca; mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;
merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca; milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca; mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca;
munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca; mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;
McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;nimhinfo@nih.gov; nejmcust@mms.org; prevention@ps.gc.ca; communications@ps.gc.ca;
mcknight.pycnodont@hotmail.com; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca; mphelps@otla.com; Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca;
nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca; ocap@tao.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;
Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca; pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca;
pkormos-qp@ndp.on.ca; prevention@ps.gc.ca; prognosticatingw371@mobilemessage.com; pwang@adni.net;

PoiliP@parl.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;


randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca; russem@sen.parl.gc.ca;
rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca; rattel@sen.parl.gc.ca; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;
spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca;
smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca; smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca; sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca; spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;
stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca; szwebmaster@yahoo.com;
support@besthotfilms.com; Symantec@reply.digitalriver.com; swainger@unbc.ca; Sweet.D@parl.gc.ca;
terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca;
tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca; tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca; victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca;
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; vanlop1@parl.gc.ca; vanlop0@parl.gc.ca; webadmin@justice.gc.ca;
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; web@ps.gc.ca;
willis@forces.gc.ca; Williams.J@parl.gc.ca; Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca;
philreporter1989@yahoo.ca;editor@philreporter.com; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; info@vivelecanada.ca; nphlstatistician@hotmail.com;
press@transparency.org;ti-can@transparency.ca; askgov@worldbank.org, sprayriver@yahoo.ca;
newsroom@globeandmail.com; news@citynews.ca; newsdesk@metronews.ca;
admin@georginaadvocate.com; admin@stouffvillesun.com; archbishop@archtoronto.org

164
There goes my willingness to suspend the disbelief and
time for the government to collapse.

The Attorney General’s Office has clearly admitted the


Attorney General is the Government’s chief legal
adviser not being representative of the people.

The issues which I have addressed on my web site


were derived from first hand knowledge of my attempt
to find justice consistent with the Charter and they say I
am on my own and get a lawyer if I think I can afford a
long inane battle against them as they use all the
resources of the government where all the personnel are
advised by him against the people who finance them,
including me who has paid his fair share..

165
February 7 2008

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of Crime Section
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Your File 2007-1355445


Complaint 2 RCMP members refused http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
to investigate
Government Organized Crime
Corruption and Conspiracy

Hi Bob

Thanks for sending me your e-mail address on February 5 2008 and I appreciate that you will look at the e-
mails I send you when you find the time which are relative to the case you are investigating

Every e-mail I have sent you via the webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca address and everything published on the
Charter Democracy Force webs site which includes a link to 9 other web sites where evidence is published
is relative to my complaint of Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy against the
individual’s of the moral majority which is on going and I continue to inform the government personnel
whose e-mail addresses are published in a document AAAAAAAALIST on said Charter Democracy Force
web site.

I created that web site after our telephone conversation where you requested some direction as to how to
about looking into the preponderance of evidence on web sites
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
which were referenced in the November 8 2007 complaint against 2 RCMP members who refused to
investigate the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy.

I have informed you that I highly doubt these 2 members would take it upon themselves not to investigate
and most likely they consulted with their superiors on these issues.

The fact is I originally sent the evidence to Sgt Michael Thomson of the RCMP Milton detachment back in
January 2006 who also refused to investigate.

I could have filed against him too and others at Ottawa and the RCMP Commissioner himself who I had
also provided the evidence prior to the filing of the complaint on November 8 2007 but my intention was
as it has always been to initiate a Public Inquiry into the Government Organizeed Crime of corruption and
conspiracy which the evidence has always been irrefutable long before the November 8 2007 complaint.
against the 2 subject RCMP members who I continue to provide the evidence to either stating or implying I
want the investigation.

166
I understand your assignment is to address the complaint against the two RCMP members of refusing to
investigate and to that endeavor you must determine if the evidence provided them was trivial, frivolous or
vexatious which would provide them with valid reason not to investigate.

Since January 2006 I have written the RCMP using the Michael.Thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca e-mail
address which I have informed you previously.

You must be aware of my particularly daunting challenge addressing the RCMP informing them of the
Government Organized Crime which they are all aware of being in on the conspiracy ad irrefutably
documented where I am requesting the absurd to have them investigate themselves and their partners in
crime.

As I have mentioned to you I don’t believe for one minute the regular RCMP members are intentionally in
on the conspiracy as they are required to follow orders and policies which have been laid out by the
conspirators which become routine and believed by them to be developed from experience over the years
relative to the law.

This all becomes deeply embedded in their minds and becomes the accepted practice which everyone will
confirm as being the law as they observe the law in action through the outcome of court cases, whatever.

They all know what to do to keep a happy environment within the force and they know what is required to
get ahead.

They all have concerns for their pensions and their future with the RCMP which provides many benefits
which would be hard to come by else where.

I know well the inherent problems which has allowed the success of the Government Organized Crime and
it is to this endeavor I have written this way and that in an attempt to cover all the underlying factors which
may eventually break the government departments and agencies personnel from the spell that has been cast
from the Office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada as referenced in the book by
Jonathan Swainger.

This spell has been cast long before you or I were born and has become the guarded tradition as referenced
in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General”

Our ways become habit and routine acquiesced over time where we accept “How it is” being the path most
worn and the easiest to travel.

The problem is obvious as the rich continue to get richer and the poor get poorer but it doesn’t affect you
government people who have secure well paid jobs with great benefits as long as you don’t upset the apple
cart, so of course it is very difficult to persuade you to change.

By Law you must as it is the Law which authorizes your authority and allows you to collect the benefits as
you enforce the Law which you have sworn to uphold and the people trust you do so.

There is great mistrust these days as some incidents have surfaced but that is limited due the ability of the
Government conspirators to persistently and consistently cover it up which has been well documented on
my web sites.

167
The 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document is indicative of how they go about it and the
correspondence I have received from the various government departments and agencies is consistent with
their modus operandi which is inconsistent with the Constitution not conducive to the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights.

You know all this of course as well as every other government person who has read my reiterations upon
reiterations over and over again.

This is intended to eventually break the spell cast by the Fiction of the Attorney General as you become
more familiar with the truth over time so it can be embedded in your minds and when reasoning the facts
with the use of good old common sense you may be sincere without the exercise of thought doing the job
you are required to do that obviously need to be done in pursuant of the moral society intended by the
Constitution: Document

You know the extraordinary challenge I have set upon and the conspirators also know full well as they
simply give me the run around consistent with their M.O.

I do not know if you are in on the conspiracy willingly or cooperating with it out of habit following the
worn path of least resistance to your ultimate objective of providing yourself with a prosperous living
relative to that which is available and of course my intent is to persuade you to act in the service of the
individual’s of the moral majority so they can also prosper in Canada while complying with the Law.

What is important to you and the rest of the government personnel is just as important to every individual
but they do not have the advantages you have and you have been given the advantage so you can eradicate
immoral inclination for the benefit of the people of the moral society conducive to their guaranteed Charter
rights under the Law.

How simple my job would be if there was one government person who could be trusted to see that the Law
was administered and enforced consistent with the Law
unbiased, but alas the evidence to date irrefutably proves there is not.

The jury is still out on you but reality attests to what the facts show and it is predictable you will maintain
the status quo prolonging it until the Charter Democracy Force is known to the people when they will unite
to assure the eradication of the Government Organized Crime once and for all.

If you were of mind to help recognizing the truth as evidenced on the Charter Democracy Force web site
you would make every effort to that endeavor and the way I see it, it is imperative to spread the word
somehow to the RCMP members under you.

If you were the person required and demanded of the Law to enforce it you would be competent,
responsible and irreproachable of fortitude and conviction and would simply request the 2 subject RCMP
members to respond to you as to why they refused to investigate which I am sure you already know as well
as I.

You would also know that once the Charter Democracy Force web site becomes known to the public the
end of the Government Organized Crime is near by and if it were you who caused it to be published you
would be recognized as the ultimate Canadian hero and play a major role in the restructuring of the
government consistent with Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

168
You are well aware of the necessity of a PUBLIC INQUIRY and you can wrap up your investigation by
simply filing a report that the evidence has substance warranting a PUBLIC INQUIRY which is the only
viable option due the circumstance.

The RCMP Commissioner will send me his concluding report which will purport BENEVOLENT,
RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY declaring an exhaustive review of the evidence has been undertaken
and my allegations are unfounded.

By presenting a copy of your report with the address of the Charter Democracy web site where the
evidence is to be found along with the absurd report of the Commissioner he will have some explaining to
do which will expose the conspiracy.

Should you be harassed you have normal in house recourse to follow and you could contact the RCMP
members who were harassed as reported on the Standing Committee of Public Accounts looking into the
RCMP Pension Fund scandal.

Of course you will be subjected to harassment but the eventuality will find you highly rewarded never
mind the personal satisfaction of knowing that you did the right thing in accordance with the Law and the
wellbeing and safety of the Canadian people.

You are well informed and know the best way to go about this and of course I hope you will to clean up
the government once and for all.

You know the Charter Democracy Force will have a highly significant voice being made publicly known
at that time being true representatives of the people as they unite with the Force being the people for the
people where you will have our utmost gratitude and everlasting support as you become the Canadian hero.

Well I leave you with that to ponder as the public patiently waits.

This e-mail and any responses to it will be kept confidential between you and me, and that I promise

Sincerely

Frank Gallagher

169
1 2
9 0
8 0
2 8

2/16/08
Reality Demands
the Exorcism of the Attorney Generals

Many a tear has to fall


Until the fall of the two tiered system of the bald two faced liars

Fiction Conspiracy Irrefutably Exposed

170
Constitution Act, 1982
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

In 1982 the Federal Government enacted the Constitution guaranteeing every Canadian individual rights
and freedoms as defined in the Charter.

With the enactment it was immediately incumbent upon the government personnel to restructure the legal
system to be consistently efficient, irreproachably effective in respect of the support to the guarantee to the
individual whose safety and wellbeing is wholly dependent and guaranteed as per the provisions of the
Charter.

The government personnel employed to administer and enforce the Constitution must be consistently
competent, responsible, efficient and irreproachably effective in continuity from top to bottom coherent
and attentive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular,
without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or
mental or physical disability.
The moral majority is not involved in the administering and enforcing of the law having careers in other
fields of endeavor and they must be able to trust the government personnel of the legal system to do the job
they are financed and must be experienced and proficient to do.

The simple fact is the moral majority is mentally and physically incompetent in varying degrees but all
must be presumed to be incoherent and helpless in respect of the equality of the guarantee without
discrimination whereas the responsibility to ensure the legal system is consistent with the Constitution
conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights is the sole responsibility of the personnel financed
by the people specifically for that purpose.

This is “How it must be” according to the Constitution Act, 1982 the supreme law of Canada which
recognizes the supremacy of God in this Charter Democracy of Canada.

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
http://groups.google.com/group/dear-government

These web sites contain irrefutable evidence the government is not only incompetent to the support of the
Charter Democracy but has in fact conspired against the moral majority in Organized Crime of Corruption
and Conspiracy perpetrated against the individual’s of the moral majority.

I have provided all this information to a prodigious number of prominent members of the government
whose e-mail addresses are listed on the last two pages and their refusal to act appropriately as defined and
demanded of a government elected and financed to administer and enforce the Constitution consistent with
the Charter Democracy conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights implicates them to the
conspiracy.

171
The link to the “Law Society of Upper Canada” 2 Part document published on web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms is indicative of
the M.O. of the government conspirators who adamantly stated or implied their members are not required
to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and evidence is irrelevant to their decisions
where attentiveness is to the support of their members in their persistent effort to ransack the moral
majority.

The web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force attempts to organize the evidence


collected by the http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-
freedoms and the http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society to make it more efficiently and
effectively absorbable for the ultimate purpose of eradicating the conspiracy.

The web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy attempts to expose the conspiracy in a


simple manner but never the less requires a commitment to study the material provided to an honest
conclusion of the analysis.

The web site http://groups.google.com/group/dear-government contains links to some of the other


documents I sent to the members of the government on my e-mail list to demonstrate the efforts I made to
bring them on side with the law, God and the moral majority to no avail as they remain loyal to the
conspiracy irrefutably implicating them.

Lawyer File # 7 (Pages 4-17)


Ontario Attorney General Michael Bryant

The Attorney General has been informed of the government conspiracy which he is a major player and the
evidence on the web sites clearly shows he has acted as any honest to goodness conspirator would do.

“Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” (Pages 12 -15)


The Attorney General wears far too many hats for the Charter Democracy as enacted in 1982

Clearly the Attorney General is a very influential member of the government and is responsible for the
public interest and constitutional matters.

“The Fiction of the Attorney General” by Jonathon Swainger

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

The traditional Democracy described in this book has been superseded by the Charter Democracy 1982
but the Attorney General carries on business as usual in the traditional unscrupulous ways as defined in the
book and the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” as he guards tradition and “the rule of
law” which has made the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada rich at the expense of the moral
majority who get poorer and poorer.

The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and as the "guardian of the public interest".
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily

172
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.
The rule of law, that most elusive concept is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define
proves the scheming nature of the members of the legal profession not concerned about justice but the
opportunities to make money at the expense of justice and the moral majority who finance the whole
damned legal system.

In 1982 the Federal Government guaranteed the individual rights and freedoms as defined in the Charter
where it is impossible to carry on business as usual in their traditional unscrupulous ways and back the
Charter guarantee.

Overnight these deceiving unscrupulous greedy scum of the earth had to convert to respectable responsible
people, beyond reproach dedicated with fortitude and conviction to the wellbeing and safety of every
individual as guaranteed by the Charter but legal professional tradition is a bad habit to break as the
evidence clearly shows the bullshit of the Attorney General continues to this very day.

Make no mistake; they are in noncompliance with the law no different than pirates, conspirators engaged
in Organized Crime against the moral majority who hold them in trust.

The moral majority finance their overhead by paying for the entire legal system from which they operate in
disrespect of the law, God and the people who elected them believing they represented them and were the
people’s voice.

The web sites identify the conspirators and provide them every possible opportunity to act on behalf of the
people in respect of the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution, which recognizes the supremacy of God
but they remain loyal to tradition which has remained consistent since before Confucius said 2500 years
ago

“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY…finally I began to make out what was written
between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE.”

The democracy of old has been replaced by the Charter Democracy which the government will admit
openly in public to the crowds but refuse to support the guarantee to the individual as they act like a gang
of cowardly bullies beating the individual to the ground.

the Charter Democracy Force


An organization of the people for the people of the moral majority will make them comply with the law
which is in the simplest terms coincidental to the wisdom of Confucius who stated

“Do not do to others what you would not have done to yourself”
“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”

That’s it government conspirators


Comply or say Goodbye
173
To: Province of Ontario March 30 2007
From: Frank Gallagher
Attorney General Lawyer file # 7 34 Riverglen Drive
Michael Bryant Keswick, On.
L4P 2P8
mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org franklyone@hotmail.com

Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom


Canada is founded on PRINCIPLES that RECOGNIZES the
SUPREMACY OF GOD and THE RULE OF LAW

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.
32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the
authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b)
to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the
legislature of each province.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal
benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or
ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Re: Compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997


Compliance with the Constitution Act, 1982

Files to follow (fax)

Lawyer File # 1: Copy of my letter to Rick Hennessey, ORHT


Lawyer File # 2: Copy of my letter to Dave Grech, Coordinator-Investigations and Enforcement Unit, MMAH
Lawyer File # 3: Copy of my letter to Hon. John Gerretsen, Minister of MMAH.
Lawyer File # 4: Copy of my letter to G. Carlino, Ombudsman
Lawyer File # 5: Copy of my letter to Julia Munro, MPP
Lawyer File # 6: Copy of my letter to Premier Dalton McGuinty

Toronto Sun Copy of a file to Toronto Sun dated October 8 2007 will follow in 2 parts under separate cover

Dear Michael Bryant

I am writing to inform you there are serious matters to be dealt with regarding the administration of the “rule of law” in
Ontario and it appears you are the person having the authority to deal with it.
I have downloaded excerpts from the Attorney General Web site which have leaded me to that conclusion.
(See page 9-12)

For the past 19 months I have been endeavoring to find a person with the government who feels they are obliged to take
responsibility for the protection of the people as provided by the Constitution Act, 1982 but all I have heard from those I
have responded to is “Not me”

174
Those who did bother to correspond went as far as to prove they don’t have to give a damn about the people in
Canada.

I am of an entirely different opinion and to support it I downloaded the Constitution Act, 1982 and got to
reading a little and….. Well on the very first line of the Charter I see the words
Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

So the first thing I says to myself “What the hell does that mean?”

I looked up some of the words to see if I could put meaning to this.

founded: - to establish and organize something for the future, for example, an institution or business
- to support something, for example, a conclusion, with evidence or reasoning
- Transitive verb to realize, understand, or locate something for the first time, especially by
studying or observing

principles: – main beliefs, values, philosophies, ideology, morality, ethics, doctrine, principle

recognize: - be familiar with, know, distinguish, make out, identify, be acquainted with, be aware of, be on
familiar terms with

When I first read it I thought perhaps I had to determine who God really was which seemed like a bit much for
one individual to take on considering the scholars have different opinions and when I looked up religions on
the web all I could find is stories and myths that go back before the times of Jesus and I found that the various
religious sects picked up on which ever combinations of these myths that suit their fancy and ran with it.

The religious groups themselves cause people to segregate themselves from each other and provides something
to argue about which has to be the stupidest thing I have ever heard of because they argue about something
which can’t be resolved by present evidence.

Myths gave me a hint right off.

Anyway, when you consider the number of people who faithfully follow their religious beliefs and allow their
leaders to play with their minds it gives me cause for great concern because it sets them up for politicians who
also play with their minds asking them to have faith and trust in them.

Whether or not there is a God and I certainly believe there has to be some explanation to everything but until
we know for fact it is best to keep our wits about us for we are all in this together by no choice of our own.

Doesn’t it make more sense to put emphasis on the choices that we can make and do so with the knowledge
we have and know for sure, to create Heaven On Earth for everyone?
We’d pick up more knowledge along the way and use it for all our benefits which makes more sense than
continually fooling ourselves to a point we would even argue with out the facts.

Such nonsense affects the lives of everyone which allows the leaders who can present the best stories and
make them believable the power to incite their believers into riots which of course is not the best way to go
about finding peace on earth.

So the words “supremacy of God” in matters of THE LAW has nothing to do with beliefs but what the word
God stands for in terms of morality which has to mean the same to each and every one of us if we are to live in
a peaceful law abiding society.
175
The word God must stand for COMMON SENSE and who would argue that yet if we are not all of the same SENSE
there could not be SENSE in COMMON.

Obviously if one’s religion believes they can unite and harm people who don’t share their beliefs, whether they be
based on spiritual or ideological reason then they must ask what soundness they have used in their thinking and answer
it with none at all.

Why have they devoted so much time to their religions: ….for example saying the Lord’s Prayer and not getting the
message?

What do they understand about it and the TEN COMMANDMENTS? Why do people feel they need to worship
someone who they do not know or have ever seen?

Being idolized is a two way street where one struts their pride and ego in front of others who give them the pride and
ego to strut.

God does not strut amongst us in such manner because it is his ways that he wants us to worship and obviously the
only way we will ever live together in harmony is with one COMMON SENSE.

He wants us to think God and his ways, as the only way and obviously He wants us to think for there sure isn’t much
point to things if you don’t

If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery why not mirror God’s way and show Him you truly worship Him.
Insulting His intelligence and wasting the brain He gave us must surely bring tears to His eyes.
Perhaps that’s why oceans are salty.

When kids do something wrong their parents scold them and tell them to think before they act but when they think
remarkably quick and say but you do it they say “Do as I say, not what I do”

That has to be confusing but the most important thing is to think it out to determine what is right immediately after you
do what they say.

It is one thing to obey because your life is in harms way and another to ensure you don’t put it in harm’s way again but
most important is to think it out the whole way to sane conclusion.

In this way there is hope for your future.

By the time we become adults we have struggled for our independence but not until we get out working do we know
what struggle really is.

We think back upon our growing years and remember many times when our parents didn’t seem fair but when we
think about it know they believed they were doing everything for our own good, at least the majorities were.

In the working world we struggle to find a job which pays enough to make life worth while and considering we work a
major part of our waking hours we hope to find a job we can enjoy. It’s quite a balancing act and most of the balancing
goes into lowering our sights.
We plug our way through life, once and while casting a joke about there being nothing certain in life but death and
taxes, put a few more hours in to try to pay down some bills and work our taxes up but we eventually get tired of
complaining and realize we are only bending the ears of others who are trying to forget that the people looking after us
now don’t give a damn about us and are decidedly unfair.

Some don’t give up and continue to vote in a manipulated system where it doesn’t matter who wins for the system will
never be fair as long as the status quo remains.
As we go about our struggles we see films of the starving and people in the hospitals and thank God for our blessings

176
and figure how well off we are comparatively speaking without realizing that God has nothing to do with it for why
would He be giving us who have sinned preferential treatment over the kids that have not yet had a chance to sin.

Go ask your religious leaders for they will give you the answers to help you through it and poor pity those who have
no faith for they will just have to stare at reality with no way to deal with it.

As we finally get to a point where we are able to meet our monthly debt payments with a little left over to reward
ourselves we begin to think a little more about the people starving and many say to themselves it is a battle and I made
it by myself so they can just get up off their lazy asses and do it the same way.

Other’s with their own personal challenges easing have a little more time to think about why reality is as it is, and with
a little more thought past the obvious it becomes abundantly clear that our heads are so messed up that it has to be how
it is.

Isn’t it strange, politicians who know quite well the necessities of people, being people themselves have always
displayed their awareness of our needs by promising remedies for them to get elected and knowing full well how a
hefty raise works wonders for their spirits even though they are not struggling to survive, don’t give a thought to our
spirits, who gave them a descent job in the first place which allowed them to give themselves a raise.
They use our money to take polls and study us to come to a balance of how much they actually have to give out to stay
in power without giving too much, all driven to remain in power for their own ulterior purposes.

I have to admit that low income families need the benefits and I am pleased about that but it is just a patch job like
everything they do with no rational plan to actually change things to how they should be.

Politicians obviously have to appear to be doing something for the people and they are a cunning lot with the
wherewithal to do much more for the people but obviously professionals at slight of hand and skilled at playing with
peoples minds can’t be in it just for the wages and they sure aren’t there to help the people. so……..

Everything they do is obvious to all of them and those of us who are able to assemble a mountain of truths to expose
one humongous lie are few and far between in the general public but the public are far from dumb, just waiting for an
opportunity to pounce where it will make a significant difference..

The evidence I have proves for fact, what they already believe is quite a significant factor in the whole scheme of
things.

I am referring to a society which has many religions and people who are easily led to believe despite the truth will be
pleased to see evidence which supports their beliefs about the government

The key to it all is the COMMON SENSE of God’s way which is not a belief but fact in every way. There is only one
rule to obey which will cover the purpose of THE SUPREMACY OF GOD and THE RULE OF LAW which will
realize HEAVEN ON EARTH (HOE)

DO ONTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO ONTO YOU

We’ve been on a long road to HOE yet it is nowhere in sight, we have no idea where we started from or where we are,
for past and present are full of lies and only when Truth is prominent will we find our past and plot the direct route to
HOE. The priority is to HOE and the past will reveal itself as lies are eradicated, Truth remains in our minds to mind.

They who stretch for a bright future will propel forward when they release the tight grip they have on the past.

How far we have advanced from the ghastly days when four horsemen tied ropes to four limbs of another
and rode off in opposite directions as fast as they could to keep their beliefs together while pulling another’s
drastically apart while today with all that we have learned we can draw and quarter ourselves.

Let go for Christ’s sake and spring on to HOE and passed, onwards to the next HOE and so on like that.
177
God gave us all brains to think, why not? It’s all good.

When you are running as fast as you can yet going nowhere, get off the treadmill.

A dog trying to catch its tail, soon knows the despair of teaching the average human the futility of going round
in circles and by progressive thinking and a wag of its tail it takes the bone and leaves shit for those who follow.

The Constitution Act, 1982-THE LAW


******************************************************************************************
People have the most magnificent brains capable of anything imaginable good and bad and obviously bad is not
good for society.

It’s quite simple and nobody would argue differently as they slip their hands into your pockets.

The powers that be and the well off have a definite advantage over the rest of us and that’s economics 101.

We are all born to earth the same way but one grows up in a castle and another one on the streets with
completely different views of life.

Those born in the well off families don’t have the slightest idea of what it’s like to live in the ghettoes nor do I
but I do know that the crook from the ghettoes has got a lot more reason to be a crook than one from the well to
do and I do know that the well to do crook fairs better in the courts..

But the Charter states we are all equal under the law and that is the only fair thing the people have going
for them and it is up to you people to see that it happens.

There is a huge difference in every day life when those who can afford to push the limits of the laws get caught,
quite often they are not brought to trial simply because you have complicated the system to a cost we can not
afford.

The system is highly influenced by the wealthy and the laws are set up for the lawyers to feast.
In the wealthy world it is complicated I must presume for we the people have no idea, as you are aware but the
simple world we live in doesn’t need such a complicated system and we sure can’t afford to let justice drag out
which again only benefits the well to do and the immoral.

Obviously if the fine for something is $5000, pocket change to one and a year’s savings to another it is not fair
and the wealthy use this to an advantage.

Obviously they have a lot more brain power to keep them out of trouble and they have a lot of connections.

You know what I mean and I am sure you can elaborate and articulate it much better than I but unfortunately me
is all I got.

I do know when somebody has criminally wronged me.


To the people who deal in big money a loss of $150,000 may not seem like a whole lot but it’s a life savings to
people like me who actually had to earn it from scratch. I will never get it back but it doesn’t have to happen to
others
We can’t take it lightly that the system doesn’t care about us. Individually we are nobody and we don’t have the
178
clout, to make our petty little problems newsworthy so we are ignored.

That is not right or fair and when you people try to pass the buck on to us to deal with the likes of Don Wilson.
that is simply not Constitutional. I have been told how the various departments try to warn people like us about
such people but I am quite sure we are aware there is a high proportion of immoral people out there but our
rights are not to be discriminated against the mentally ill if that is what is being implied.

You people are all organized or I should say all assembled and should have a system that runs smoothly and
deliberately to rid society of immoral inclination and I can attest to the fact that you do not and in fact prove
the system is deliberately set up not to provide for us peasants.

I have provided evidence beyond all doubt that Don Wilson defrauded me in a court room financed by the
provincial government, part of the system set up to administer law and they allow criminal acts to happen right
there in front of the judicator without pressing charges.

That says a whole lot about the system and when I tried to bring this to the attention of all those who should be
concerned, most didn’t even bat an eyelash and I would say they do not have an attitude consistent with the
spirit of the Constitution.

When those who did look into it cited various Acts to support their argument that they didn’t have to help, all
they did is support my argument that they do not have a modus operandi in place to protect the people as
guaranteed by the Charter

That is pathetically obvious as is the difference between a person of wealth and one of us peasants.

It’s one thing to be cognizant of the obvious and another to document the fact and it is well documented.

As one of the police departments or crime stoppers state predictable is preventable I have presented an
abundance of evidence which proves crime is predictable under your present system quite contrary to the
Constitution Act.

We people are not at all familiar with the ins and outs of the system and that is for sound reason that we have
different fields of endeavor and we have good reason to believe and trust that the legal system established to
administer the rule of law is competent to that purpose and we have good reason to trust it to be so.

But when the evidence shows differently it must be fixed and every effort must be made to assure it doesn’t
happen again.

The world is propelled by money but in matters of fairness and everybody equal in matters of law, money can
not have anything to do with it and if there is to be any discretionary provisions the wealthy should be hit and
hit hard because they play a big part in others starving.

They certainly have been well educated, certainly should know better than those who are uneducated with
nothing but hopeless despair who are driven to defend themselves from starvation.

There are always two sides to the story but we see only one side in the law because only one side sets it up.
I have downloaded excerpts from the Attorney General’s web site and it appears that you Michael Bryant are
the person to deal with this matter and I reiterate this is not a personal matter it is a matter between the people
and the government

179
I have initially contacted everyone from the York Regional Police to the Governor General, the army and Canadian
Federation of Taxpayers, the legislature and newspapers but of course such a matter is not something that people want to
get involved in because it simply is detrimental to their careers but by not getting involved they support my allegations.

Anyway it seems you wear many hats and in reality one has to presume you associate with influential people and we
ordinary peasants do not have such an insider type of relation even though our elected representatives are obviously
supposed to represent us and they will admit it quite adamantly but the facts are they don’t.

I will be providing you with the evidence but it is important that we understand what is going on here.

This is not a personal matter. It has to do with the inconsistencies of Ontario laws with the Constitution Act, 1982 which
concerns the legislature, you and the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and I am sure many other Acts, laws, etc.

I have come upon evidence in the course of natural reaction, to find someone who actually represents the people to help
us but have proven there is no one to be found, just words, for the people, comes from their mouths and directions that
take me in circles and a consistent determination to make me deal with the matter myself.

Quite often I have been directed to lawyers but how will they help when they are part of what is wrong with the system.

Well, as I say I downloaded your web site and what is immediately obvious is you are the representative of the people
and the government which seems okay since the government is supposed to be representing the people but it obviously
leaves the door wide open to go awry and awry it is.

With all the powers you have as defined and intertwined shown on pages 9-12, I have determined that you hold a very
influential position with the provincial government

Amongst all your duties on page 11 you will find this statement.

Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province

Ultimately I request that you take this opportunity to make things right for the people.

I started out on one simple mission and it has turned into quite a challenge which is beyond all comprehension.

I am not one to cling onto the past so I do not see how any long dragged out debate defending your position will help
move us into the future where we should have been centuries ago.

There is only one clear simple way to approach this is for you to deal with the concerns I have addressed in the Lawyer
Files 1- 7 and the letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006 which clearly shows that Don Wilson committed fraud
under the criminal code on two accounts over $100,000 and filed a false and misleading information $43,000, an offense
under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 in the courts of the land which government staff have declined to act upon which
is intolerable in a moral society where the system is mandated to deal with the immoral. The cards are all there, deal
them out responsibly and lead us into the belated future.

The people mentioned must be duly punished considering the number of opportunities I have provided them to represent
the people which they would have us believe they do

The government staff must know that along with the trust and power they are given the people must be able to trust them
to use the power for the people which is all the power they have been mandated with.

Your attention must be directed to morality within the government and full speed against immorality by due punishment
when they are caught which is the only way to get to the minds of the people that immorality will not be tolerated here in
Canada. Huge problems first appear as little ones. Take them out and the rest will take care of them selves.

180
The thing with thinking is once you get started it is difficult to stop and if it is was focused for good there is nothing to
stop us from making up the time we have lost and when you think about it sanely things will be sane.

When I make reference to morality I am in no way talking about the bedrooms of the people.

Fair and equality is what the law is all about and if you don’t take care of that, who will?

I request that you deal with all matters within the Lawyer Files #s 1-7

Thank you
Frank Gallagher

PS
This is not about attentiveness to dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s

DO ONTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO ONTO YOU says it all.

181
Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General
The Attorney General has a unique role to play as a Minister.

One part of the Attorney General's role is that of a Cabinet Minister. In this capacity the Minister is
responsible for representing the interests and perspectives of the Ministry at Cabinet, while simultaneously
representing the interests and perspectives of Cabinet and consequently the Government to the Ministry
and the Ministry's communities of interest.

The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming
from this role are unlike those of any other Cabinet member. The role has been referred to as "judicial-
like" and as the "guardian of the public interest".

Much has been written on the subject of ministerial responsibilities and the unique role of the Attorney
General.

There are various components of the Attorney General's role. The Attorney General has unique
responsibilities to the Crown, the courts, the Legislature and the executive branch of government. While
there are different emphases and nuances attached to these there is a general theme throughout all the
various aspects of the Attorney General's responsibilities that the office has a constitutional and traditional
responsibility beyond that of a political minister.

The statutory responsibilities of the office are found in section 5 of the Ministry of the Attorney General
Act. Section 5 states:

The Attorney General,


(a) is the Law Officer of the Executive Council;
(b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law;
(c) shall superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario;
(d) shall perform the duties and have the powers that belong to the Attorney General and Solicitor General
of England by law and usage, so far as those powers and duties are applicable to Ontario, and also shall
perform the duties and powers that, until the Constitution Act, 1867 came into effect, belonged to the
offices of the Attorney General and Solicitor General in the provinces of Canada and Upper Canada and
which, under the provisions of that Act, are within the scope of the powers of the Legislature;
(e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and upon all
matters of law referred to him or her by the Government;
(f) shall advise the Government upon all matters of a legislative nature and superintend all Government
measures of a legislative nature;
(g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law connected with
such ministries and agency;
(h) shall conduct and regulate all litigation for and against the Crown or any ministry or agency of
government in respect of any subject within the authority or jurisdiction of the Legislature;
(i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices;
(j) shall perform such other functions as are assigned to him or her by the Legislature or by the Lieutenant
Governor in Council. "

What follows is an overview of the various components of the Attorney General's roles and
responsibilities, primarily as outlined in the Act.

182
Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a))
The role of chief law officer might be referred to as the Attorney General's overall responsibility as the
independent legal advisor to the Cabinet - and some have even suggested that the role possibly extends to
the Legislature as well. The importance of the independence of the role is fundamental to the position and
well established in common law, statutes and tradition.
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.

The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained
and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.

In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General's
policy advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet. The Attorney General's legal
advice or constitutional advice should not be lightly disregarded. The Attorney General's policy advice has
the same weight as that of other ministers.

Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d))


One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General's role is the responsibility for criminal
prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section 92 gives the
provinces authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justice and thereby gives
the provincial Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal Code.

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General
and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether or
not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the prosecution
should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.

It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry out the
Minister's criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political
pressures. The Attorney General's responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken -
and seen to be undertaken - on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations.
Whether to initiate or stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy. This responsibility
has been characterized as a matter of the Attorney General acting as the Queen's Attorney - not as a
Minister of the government of the day.

This is not to suggest that decisions regarding criminal prosecutions are made in a complete vacuum. A
wide range of policy considerations may be weighed in executing this responsibility, and the Attorney
General may choose to consult the Cabinet on some of these considerations. However any decisions
relating to the conduct of individual prosecutions must be the Attorney General's alone and independent of
the traditional Cabinet decision making process. In practice, in the vast majority of cases, these decisions
are made by the Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys.

An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting criminal
prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which includes not only
the community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a distinct responsibility to
the court to present all the credible evidence available.

183
The responsibility is to present the case fairly - not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of
criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One of the
Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the public in
understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.

Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature, for
decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the
prosecution is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicae rule
bars any comment on a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub judicae rule
strictly prohibits the Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions that are before the courts. Given
the stature of the Attorney General's position, any public comment coming from the office would be seen
as an attempt to influence the case.

Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individual criminal
cases, such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political interference.
Accordingly, it is traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of the Attorney
General's agents, the Crown Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where the public would
expect the Attorney General to be briefed.

Legislative Responsibilities (s. 5(e) and (f))

The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These
responsibilities have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in
accordance with principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) above). This is obviously an
important and broad area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise on the
constitutionality and legality of legislation.

The Attorney General's legislative responsibilities are played out in a variety roles. The Office of
Legislative Counsel reports to the Attorney General. Legislative Counsel plays a key role in ensuring the
legal integrity of Government legislation. Although the Legislative Counsel's reporting relationship to the
Attorney General does allow the Attorney General to provide guidance and set standards, individual pieces
of legislation are drafted on instructions from client ministries and are not within the sole control of
Legislative Counsel or the Attorney General. It should also be noted that Legislative Counsel also has a
direct responsibility to the Legislature as the Office also drafts all private member's bills.

The Attorney General has a further role to play as part of whatever Cabinet Committee is formed to review
legislation and regulations. Here the Minister has an opportunity to comment on the technical issues
related to legislation and regulations prior to Cabinet consideration.

The Attorney General's role on legislative matters is as an adviser to the Cabinet. Although unlikely,
Cabinet could, in theory, receive the Attorney General's legal opinion on legislation and choose to
disregard it. The Attorney General's role is not independent of Cabinet decision making as in the area of
criminal prosecutions. As was noted earlier, the Attorney General must make careful distinctions about the
legal opinions and policy or political preferences being offered about legislation.

Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d))


In addition to the specific responsibilities to conduct civil litigation on behalf of the Government and its
agencies (s. 5(h)), the Attorney General has broader litigation responsibilities flowing from the historical

184
powers of the Attorney General referred to in s. 5(d) of the Act. These powers are based on the Crown's
parens patriae (parental) authority. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only to conduct
litigation in cases directly affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases where there is a
clear matter of public interest or public rights at stake.

This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is well and
independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter challenges to
legislation, even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionally protected
rights.

Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c))

A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice in the
province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison with
the judiciary.

Given the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, the responsibility for courts
administration is often a very sensitive and delicate issue. Great care and respect for the principles of
judicial independence must be exercised in this area.

As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.

185
186
March 29, 2007

On several occasions I have requested Bruce Herridge inform me as to what efforts he has made to this
promise with no response.

January 17, 2008

Note the word “threshold” often used by members involved in the legal system.

This is the word which often puts me on the threshold of insanity.

On several occasions I have requested the prominent government members define the meaning in the
context it is used in respect of the evidence I provided of the criminal acts perpetrated by my former
tenant but of course they refuse to respond because it confirms the illegitimate two tiered system which
benefits the members of the upper tier highly detrimental to the moral majority inconsistent with the
Constitution and not conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

187
September 18 2006

To: Senator Lorna Milne To: The Right Honourable Chief


Message
Deputy Chair Justice of Canada
Delivery
Senate Committee Beverly McLachlin,P.C.
failure
Legal and Constitutional Affairs Att’n Nancy Brooks
mailto:milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca Executive Legal Officer
media@scc-cscgc.ca
From: Frank Gallagher
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On

Re: Constitution Act, 1982


The legal system in the Province of Ontario is unconstitutional)

Dear Ms. Nancy Brooks

For a year now I have been trying to get a little justice and just a smidgeon of the guarantee called for in
the Charter.

I started out with a relatively simple matter filing an application with the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal
to have a tenant evicted from my home for two reasons.
He was in arrears $8000.
He had signed an agreement dated May 6 2005 to vacate my premises on May 31 2005
He is the president of a company called BioSafe Natural Technologies, Inc. and I am a major share holder,
second only to the President.

I had given him 6 months free rent commencing February 1 2004 ending July 31 2004 when he agreed to
pay me $800 a month beginning August 1 2004. One thing led to another and eventually I realized this
man was a swindler and I wanted him out of my house.

I filed an application with the ORHT June 6 2005 to evict and attached a copy of an agreement dated May
6/05
The tenant filed a dispute with the ORHT which was completely false and misleading (all lies) and during
the course of the hearing he denied having ever seen the May 6 2005 agreement which he had signed.
I proved that he did sign it and I also proved that his dispute was false and misleading.

The important part about the tenant denying having ever seen the document is that he had used a false
signature for the purpose of denying it.

This document also contained matters concerning the Corporation which made the significance of the
document in the $150,000 range for me and my friends.
The document also protected share holders who had invested prior to me.

He had obviously committed the act of fraud right there in front of the judicator and it is all a matter of
record.
His false and misleading dispute is also fraud.

188
This is where the trouble begins.

I attempted to get the judicator to lay charges for these offences but they declined.
I attempted to get the Investigations and Enforcement unit to lay charges but they declined.
I then corresponded and met with the York Regional Police but they declined.
I met with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police but they declined.
I wrote the Ontario Provincial Police and they declined but informed me that the YRP had jurisdiction.

I wrote my MP, the Prime Minister, the leaders of the other parties, the Attorney General, the Governor
General, the Armed Forces, the Canadian Tax Payer’s Federation, OCAP and other charity organizations,
the Churches and all the GTA major newspapers and some TV stations with no response.

I then created a 266 page document with a cover and back page which includes the correspondence from
the various departments with my commentaries.

The evidence in this document proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the legal system in Ontario is not
consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982 and it is in fact a conspiracy against the people to steal their
money through the taxation system.

Within these writings is correspondence with the Law Society of Upper Canada which proves they have no
interest in justice and their only interest is money.
I had written them regarding a lawyer who terminated a landscaping contract I had in Bolsover.
He terminated it under his client’s instructions stating that I had entered into a contract with his client to
build a dock and a deck with the work to commence June 5 and to be completed June 15 2006.

The lawyer’s termination letter was dated June 16 2006 and he goes on to say that I have not completed the
work and in fact has been barely started. He states that I have not attended the site and have left my
workers unsupervised and in fact some have quit and left the site because of it.

There is not one word of truth in this, so I wrote the lawyer asking by what authority does he terminate my contract
and what allowances are provided to lawyers to write so much crap. I requested that he send me a copy of the
contract he is referring to.

I forwarded a copy to the Law Society of Upper Canada and they responded that they understood the urgency of my
letter but in order to give my concerns the attention they deserve it would take 30 days.
Two months later I get their response which states that they see nothing wrong.

During the waiting period I asked both the lawyer and the Law Society if they would send me a copy of the
purported contract which I never received.

The fact is the contract does not have a completion date and further more the contract says that I am to be paid in full
when Charlotte Silverthorne was satisfied that I had completed the work, identified in the contract, to her
satisfaction.

I have written back to the Law Society of Upper Canada letting them know how disappointed I am with them and I
wait for their response. I do not expect to hear from them any time soon because they have a lot of splainin to do.

Anyway, on September 1 2006 I sent this 266 page document to the Premier of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty and I
have also sent copies to: YRP, RCMP and the Ombudsman.
I forgot to mention the Ombudsman earlier when I was listing who I had corresponded with.

189
On Friday the 15th I sent a copy to my MP and my MPP.

I expect it will be quite a while before I hear from them.

Meanwhile I am sending my information to as many people as I can with hopes that the information gets the
attention it deserves.

It contains serious issues regarding the legal system in Ontario and the inconsistencies with the
Constitution Act.

I know it is a lot to ask of you to sit down and read my 266 pages but as I say it is of a most serious matter and I
believe you are the person to look into this.

So, please find attached the index file and the first 50 pages of the file I sent to the Premier dated September 1 2006.

From this day on it will be referred to as the “BLACK BOOK”

This book is finished and I have opened a new file called the “BLUE BOOK”
It contains my commentaries on the correspondence in the BLACK BOOK and it will contain any and all future
correspondence.

I hope to hear from you shortly

Please let me know if you have received the 3 page index, the cover page and the first 50 pages and let me know if
you want me to send the rest.

Thank you,
Frank Gallagher

Thank you for your interest in the Department of Justice Canada.

This confirms receipt of the message which you recently sent. If further action is
required or has been requested, we will respond as quickly as possible. Please note
that because we experience a high volume of correspondence, answers to complex and
multiple questions will take more time.

This is an acknowledgement of receipt of your correspondence and no reply is


necessary at this time.

Web Administrator
Department of Justice
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
webadmin@justice.gc.ca <mailto:webadmin@justice.gc.ca> www.canada.justice.gc.ca 1-
800-O-Canada (1-800-622-6232) TTY/TDD 1-800-465-7735

190
Brooks Nancy [BrooksN@scc-csc.gc.ca]; on behalf of; media [media@scc-csc.gc.ca]

Tuesday 9:49 AM Sept. 19,2006

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

The Supreme Court of Canada cannot give legal advice nor answer the numerous requests for legal information that
we receive from Canada and abroad. We cannot respond to comments on the decisions of the Court or the legal
system. Nor can we provide suggestions on how you may wish to manage your landlord-tenant dispute and related
matters.

Yours truly,

Nancy Brooks
Executive Legal Officer / Adjointe exécutive juridique
Chambers of the Chief Justice of Canada / Cabinet de la Juge en chef du Canada
Supreme Court of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada
301 Wellington Street / 301 rue Wellington
Ottawa K1A 0J1
mailto:brooksn@scc-csc.gc.ca
Tel./Tél.: 613-996-9296 | Fax/Téléc.: 613-952-3092

This e-mail message may contain privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée et confidentielle. Il est interdit de l'utiliser ou de la divulguer sans autorisation.

-----Original Message-----
From: frank Gallagher [mailto:franklyone@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:45 PM
To: media
Subject: Constitution Act

September 20 2006

Dear Ms. Brooks

I thank you for your quick response.

But I am not looking for suggestions regarding my personal concerns with Don Wilson. I have referred to my
personal situation to illustrate that the people’s Rights and Freedoms are not being protected as guaranteed by the
Constitution. This is proven in the 266 pages of the BLACK BOOK which I referred to and sent you the first 50
pages.

My mission now is to find the proper authority to report to. It certainly is an important CONSTITUTION issue. Am I to
record you as not being concerned with the protection of the people’s rights as guaranteed by the Charter? I am
concerned and I am demonstrating that by doing more than just stating the words. I would like to mention that I have
put thousands of hours into this of my own time. Surely someone paid by the taxpayers should feel a little more
concerned for them.

I would appreciate your attention to this matter and if the protection of the people’s rights and freedoms is a concern
of yours I request that you demonstrate that by directing this matter to the proper authority and if there is no such
authority please state so. The people should know that the guarantee of the Charter is just words and that there is
no guarantee leaving them victims of one of the biggest scams ever beset on mankind.

If you are concerned please look at the attached file containing correspondence of the Law Society of Upper Canada
which proves beyond any doubt that they don’t give a damn about the people of Canada.

191
You are obviously in a better position than I to see whatever needs to be done is done. To just say pick a number
from 1 -10,000 and say nope sorry not me and hang up is not exactly illustrating the concern for the people who pay
your wages and the others who are responsible for our welfare. I admit that we people are forced to pay our taxes by
the authority of the Constitution and perhaps would not do our part so trustingly if not for the efficiency of the tax
system and our protection as per the guarantee should be as efficient. You should be obligated to do whatever is
within your capabilities to this endeavor and I would think that this is a priority one.

Although this is a lot of reading and the tendency would be to speed read I suggest that your response indicates that
you did not grasp the serious nature of my writings and if you did it further proves that we people are being ripped off
with nobody to watch over our interests.

Please deal with this matter with the seriousness it deserves.

Please find the portion of the BLUE BOOK dealing with the Law Society of Upper Canada attached if you should find
the time.

Thank you

Yours sincerely,

Frank Gallagher

September 25 2006

To: WHOM IT DOES CONCERN


To: To: Senators (Ontario)
The Government of Canada etal
The Government of the Province of Ontario etal PM Art Eggleton
ATTY. GEN John Trevor Eyton
Premier of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, MPP Hugh Segal
The Honourable John Gerretsen MP Marie –P Poulin
YRP P. Michael Pitfield
From: Frank Gallagher RCMP Jeramiel S Graftstein
34 Riverglen Drive Anne C.Cools
Keswick, Ontario
L4P 2P8
Norman K. Atkins
franklyone@hotmail.com Peter A. Stollery
David P. Smith
Re: Charter Rights Frank W. Mahovlich
Marjory Le Breton
Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal
Order under section 69
Colin Kenny
Tenant Protection Act,1997 Mac Harb
File Number TNL-67103

Dear WHOM

This is to inform you that the people’s rights and freedoms under the Constitution Act, 1982 as provided in, Schedule B, Part 1,
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms are not being protected as guaranteed by the Charter.

I filed an application to evict a tenant from my basement apartment on June 06 2005 with the ORHT because he was in arrears
$8000 and he had refused to vacate my premises as he agreed to on May 31 2005.
I attached a copy of the agreement dated May 6 2005 to the application which supports my application.

On June 10 2005 Don Wilson my tenant filed a dispute with the ORHT which I proved to be a false and misleading
information.

192
During the course of the hearing on the first day June 30 2005 Don Wilson (tenant) committed two acts of fraud.(Actually 3
acts of fraud –dispute and the two agreements)

Don Wilson was shown copies of the May 6 2005 agreement which I had filed and attached to the application and a copy of the
April 13 2005 agreement which was a superseded version of the May 6 2005 which I presented to the Tribunal.

He denied having ever seen them or signing them or initialing them. I provided a witness Dave Kirby
( witness to the April 13 2005 agreement) who identified Don Wilson as the person who signed the April 13 2005 agreement.

Don Wilson had signed both of these agreements with a false signature making it obvious that he was a fraud.

During the course of the hearing I said to Nancy Fahlgren (Judicator) “There ought to be a law.”
She said “There is” and when on to say that she could file with Investigations and Enforcement

I received the Order under section 69, Tenant Protection Act,1997, File Number TNL-67103 dated August 8 2005 in the mail
which found for me.

This order proves that the court concurred with the 2 agreements May 6 2005 and the April 13 2005 agreements even though
Don Wilson had denied ever seeing them and had signed them with a false signature. By doing so the order proved that the
dispute filed by Don Wilson was false and misleading information.

The order made no mention of the fraud so I began my trek in search of my guarantee under the Charter.
I wanted Don Wilson charged for fraud.

I began my trek for Justice on or about August 10 2005 beginning with the ORHT and then the Investigations and Enforcement
Unit, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and when they declined to act I took all my files to the York Regional Police
and we had a couple of meetings and much correspondence but they declined to act. I then took the matter to the RCMP and
after much correspondence they declined to act. The OPP declined to act stating the YRP had jurisdiction.

I wrote my MP Peter Van Loan on at least two separate occasions and he declined to respond.
I wrote the Governor General, Attorney General (Federal and Provincial), Armed forces, Canadian Taxpayers Federation
(Federal, Provincial and others) and the list goes on.
They all declined to respond

I wrote the Ombudsman and they declined to act

I wrote my MPP, Julia Munro but no response.


I wrote again to MPP, Julia Munroe who respond but declined to act( I should take care of it myself.)
I put a file together which I now refer to as the BLACK BOOK dated September 1 2006 and faxed it to the Premier of Ontario,
Dalton McGuinty, but he has not responded.
I sent a portion of the BLACK BOOK to Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Honourable John Gerretsen but he has
not responded. I sent full copies of the BLACK BOOK to the YRP, RCMP, Ombudsman and MPP but they have not
responded. MP phone call from his office. She will give it to him

The BLACK BOOK consists of a cover page, 3 index pages, 266 pages and a back cover page.
I have opened a new file which I refer to as the BLUE BOOK

On September 18 2006 I sent the cover page of the BLACK BOOK and the first 50 pages

To: Senator Lorna Milne To: The Right Honourable Chief To:The Minister of Justice
and
Deputy Chair Justice of Canada the Attorney General of
Senate Committee Beverly McLachlin,P.C. Canada
Legal and Constitutional Affairs Att’n Nancy Brooks The Honourable
mailto:milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca Executive Legal Officer Vic Toews
media@scc-csc.gc.ca webadmin@justice.gc.ca

Senator Lorna Milne e-mail message came back not delivered.


Nancy Brooks responded September 19 2006 missed the point-declined to act

193
Sept 20 06 To: Nancy Brook – I tried again- No response.
No response from the Honourable Vic Toews.

I am now forwarding an excerpt from the BLUE BOOK (see attachment) to the recipients of the BLACK BOOK requesting
an immediate response I will then begin addressing other departments.

The attachment (Commentary highlighted in blue) (I draw your attention to- highlighted in yellow) Pages

Correspondence with the Ombudsman 1-6, 10,11


Excerpts from the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 7-9, 15-24
Copy of Tribunal Order File Number TNL-67103 12-14
Commentary FRAUD 25-.38
Don Wilson dispute (false misleading information) 39, 40
Purchase agreement BioSafe February 4 2004 41-43
Transfer slip from my account to Don Wilson $30,000 BioSafe Cheque to Don Wilson $10,000 44-45
May 6 2005 agreement was attached to application to evict (Don Wilson denied seeing or signing) FRAUD 46-49
Rod Bradbury EcoSafe Owner-President Never was Vice-President of BioSafe - correspondence FRAUD 50-55

I have much more evidence that proves Don Wilson is a FRAUD

I have informed them all but nobody cares.

As requested above I would appreciate an immediate response as to your receiving and will you review.
In the meantime I shall continue my search for the infamous guarantee.

Sincerely
Frank Gallagher

To:Michael.Thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; mona.eichman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Cc: citytvhosts@citytv.com; city@thestar.ca; citydesk@tor.sunpub.com; comail@lsuc.on.ca;


dmaclean@taxpayer.com; ed_hird@telus.net; editor@rd.ca; franklyone@hotmail.com; jwilliamson@taxpayer.com;
letters@globeandmail.ca; 'media'; sylviagerl@ndp.ca; shennig@taxpayer.com; sue-ann.levy@tor.sunpub.com;
tkeirddin@taxpayers.com; Vanloan.P@parl.gc.ca; Vanlop1@parl.gc.ca; webadmin@justice.gc.ca

September 29, 2006 sent e-mails 7.43 AM to replace page 1 sent 5:35 AM Dates were corrected 2006 to 2005

To: Michael Thomson Fax to: Premier Dalton McGuinty, Tim Arkell, Ombudsman, Julia Munro, MPP,
RCMP Peter Van Loan, MP Bruce Herridge, York Regional Police
brooksn@scc-csc.gc.ca
From: Frank Gallagher
franklyone@hotmail.com

Dear Michael Thomson

As you are aware I am a Canadian citizen who became victim to a scam.


This scam was identified at a Tribunal hearing of the ORHT on June 30 2005 where I had attached a copy of a May
6 2005 agreement to my application to evict my tenant Don Wilson for refusing to pay rent and for not vacating my
premises on May 31 2005 as per the May 6 2005 agreement which both he and I had signed and my mother had
witnessed.

On June 10 2005 Don Wilson had signed and filed a Dispute with the ORHT which was a humungous fabrication
which was an obvious contradiction of that which was contained in the May 6 2005 agreement
which he had signed.
During the course of the hearing Don Wilson denied having ever seen the May 6 2005 agreement and of course
denied having signed it or initialed it. I then produced another agreement dated April 13 2005 which Don Wilson and

194
I had signed and a friend of mine had witnessed. I showed it to Don and he denied ever seeing it and also denied
ever signing it.
I then introduced Dave Kirby to the Judicator as being the witness and he identified Don as the person who signed it.
Both of these agreements confirmed that Don owed me the rent money and both confirmed that he had given me
notice to vacate my premises on May 31 2005 quite contrary to the Dispute he had signed and filed with the Tribunal
stating that he was paid up until February 2009 as per special arrangements made in stock negotiations..
The agreements dealt with other matters regarding Don Wilson’s incorporated business BioSafe which I am a major
share holder. The value of the document on paper to me and my friends is about $150,000 but it also protected the
investors who had come before me increasing the value on paper to around $300,000. Probably about 20 investors
in all.
The reason I had him sign them in the first place is because he had given cause for me to distrust him.

The Tribunal was adjourned to July 28 2005 for the Tribunal’s decision and I should make note that Nancy Fahlgren
(Judicator) announced at the beginning of the hearing that it was not being recorded.
th
I do have a copy of the June 30 as you know as I provided you a copy.

On August 10 2005 I received the Tribunal Order under Section 69, Tenant Protection Act, 1997 File Number TNL-
67103 dated August 8 2005 which found for me and Don Wilson was ordered to pay me the arrears and vacate my
premises.

I had asked Nancy Fahlgren on June 30th at the hearing if she would be charging Don Wilson with fraud and in fact I
had said “There should be a law” when it was revealed that Don was a fraud, and Nancy said “There is and she
could forward it onto the Investigations and Enforcement Unit”. I should note that this part of the hearing is not on the
recording of the hearing so it was either erased or Nancy turned off the recorder.

The Tribunal Order never indicated that Don Wilson had been charged for fraud which initiated my search for justice
which I have not found to date.( over a year now)

What I have found is that which I am sure the public have been aware of but just unable to prove.

The administrators of the Constitution Act, 1982 have used their authority mandated by the Act for their own
benefit disregarding the Charter rights of the people.

195
January 17, 2008

To this date I have not found the justice guaranteed and necessary for the support of the Charter
guarantee to the individual but have irrefutably proven justice is not obtainable through the present legal
system in control of the government conspirators of Organized Crime against the moral majority who
have taken advantage of their trust to ransack them in every possible way without causing them to rise in
revolt against them.

The old democracy they operated under is history well documented superseded by the Constitution Act,
1982 well documented which contains the Federal Government guarantee to every individual which they
have refused to accept responsibility for, well documented which will immediately fade them into the
annals of the infamous of history as the moral majority unite with the Charter Democracy Force to
bring them before the people to account for their actions of conspiracy against the moral majority and the
Constitution itself which is a treasonable offence where the moral majority will seek out the maximum
punishment as provided by law to those who persist loyal to the conspiracy.

At this moment I await a response to my e-mail of January 11 2008 from Pierre Leduc, Insp. RCMP - GRC
Executive Assistant to the Commissioner which will either irrefutably prove the involvement of the RCMP
Commissioner with the conspiracy or signal the end of the government conspiracy of Organized Crime as he
realizes his appointment as Deputy Minister is illegitimate inconsistent with the Constitution not conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as are all laws enacted, administered and enforced by the
conspirators of the Organized Crime perpetrated against the moral majority in absolute defiance of the
law.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

January 11 2008

Frank Gallagher
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On
L4P 2P8
franklyone@hotmail.com

Pierre Leduc, Insp.


RCMP - GRC
Executive Assistant to the Commissioner /
Adjoint exécutif du commissaire
Office: (613) 993-0882
Cell: (613) 552-1884
Fax: (613) 993-0309
e-mail: pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: File 2007-1355445


Purpose to investigate complaints of 2 members http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
of the RCMP refusing to investigate Government corruption and conspiracy filed with the
Commission
196
for Public Complaints Against the RCMP: Files PC-2007-2316 and PC-2007-2316

Dear Pierre Leduc

This is a follow up of your recent e-mail to me January 7 2008 which you were addressing my January 2
2008 to the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot. (Copy enclosed See page 6)

It seems the further we get into this the further we get away from it, with the investigation needing an
investigation with more things to look into to determine the truth.

That is what this is all about is it not? To determine the truth, Right? At least that is my objective.

Of course that is not what the evidence on my web sites of the government indicates as the complaint
suggests.
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

Since I filed the complaint on November 8 2007 with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the
RCMP the correspondence with them and the RCMP Commissioner’s office is quite discerning being
indicative of what the evidence on the web sites show.

As the Guardians site will continue to add the evidence as it comes including this document which should
be easy enough to follow for a competent, responsible, irreproachable RCMP investigator with fortitude
and conviction to purpose which in this case is a matter of the government Organized Crime of corruption
and conspiracy against the people where the evidence irrefutably shows the government departments,
agencies whatever do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which is the
responsibility of the Federal Government to back the guarantee since they made it in the 1982 enactment of
the Constitution.

The purpose of this exercise is to make them give a damn and restructure the system to be consistent with
the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as is their obligation as per the
Charter and common law in the matter of putting your money where your mouth is as per the guarantee
they made and refuse to back.
This of course is a very serious issue which requires a very sane serious responsible competent
irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction who comprehends the seriousness of the situation,
understands the properties of a guarantee and the spirit intended under the supreme law of Canada which
recognizes the supremacy of God.

The 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document published at the top of web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
is indicative of the way the whole government system works which has been irrefutably proven by the
documents on my web site and would be recognized as such by a person with the necessary traits described
above.

The fact the RCMP have been apprized of the evidence since January 2006 which I have been providing
by e-mail using the Michael.Thomson@rcmp-rc.gc.ca address and Sgt. Roy Steinebach confirmed on October 18
2007 that the RCMP have been receiving it and have been keeping it on file is very disconcerting that they have not
acted upon it and of course is why I filed the complaint.

197
The fact that the evidence is so clear of the government Organized Crime, corruption and conspiracy it proves one
of two things or both and I highly suspect a combination of both.

The upper echelon is in on the conspiracy because it could not be happening without their cooperation and the rest
of the unit is not competent enough to recognize it or deal with it.

There is the natural course of things where they are all taught to follow the flow routinely with their knowledge of the
law gained through hand me down experience and legal information originating from the Office of the Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada and in Ontario focus is on being alert to Ontario Law.

Therein lays the problem because the Ontario laws are not consistent with the Constitution nor conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which they must be according to the Constitution.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

The point is the correspondence published on my web site which I have received since I filed my
complaint on November 8 2007 with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP,
irrefutably proves the incompetence and or loyalty to the conspiracy by both the Commission for
Complaints and the Office of the RCMP Commissioner who is ultimately responsible for the actions of the
RCMP.

Whether or not it is just incompetence which I shouldn’t say just, because it is a most serious factor that
has allowed the success of the Organized Crime.

The evidence continues to dig the RCMP deeper into the conspiracy and due the very serious nature of the
issues which requires a very sane serious responsible competent irreproachable person of fortitude and
conviction who comprehends the seriousness of the situation, the properties of a guarantee and the spirit
intended under the supreme law of Canada which recognizes the supremacy of God I demand you put a
person of those traits on the case full time which it requires.

2 months have passed since the complaint was filed and I get an update report from S/Sgt. Bob MacAdam
not representative of the facts as indicated on copy (page 7) You will see the facts of the telephone
conversation in my notes of the conversation dated December 21 2007 (page 5) (Please respond)
I can not comprehend the manner in which the RCMP are dealing with this very serious matter regarding
the government Organized Crime, corruption and conspiracy which concerns the foundation of the
Constitution of Canada and the wellbeing and safety of the moral majority of the Canadian people.

The RCMP Commissioner has been provided the opportunity to demonstrate the competence of the RCMP
under his command to uphold the law of the land conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
and I now provide you this evidence which demonstrates anything but concern for the law of the land and
the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights indicative of the entire government where their M.O. is
consistent with the M.O. of the Law Society of Upper Canada demonstrated quite effectively in the
document published on my web site “Law Society of Upper Canada Part 1 Part 2”

They are quite adamant their members needn’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights and state their members are not required to assess the validity of a client’s unfounded complaint
before commencing proceedings against his clients adversary causing undue hardship on this individual.

They also state they are not required to look at the evidence in support of my complaint which is absolutely
insane and unfortunately that is just “How it is” in this democracy of Canada where justice is impossible

198
for the moral majority obviously due to the Government Organized Crime set up well organized against
them.

When I say organized I mean the entire personnel of the Government are loyal to the conspiracy with the
majority perhaps not even aware of it as they just follow routine as they have come to know and presume
the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is legit and who would know the law better than he
and his Office staff.

But damn it, the evidence irrefutably shows he is not the person he is expected to be and refuses to back
the Charter guarantee to every individual as is his responsibility and everyone employed in the legal
system.

He is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada with precisely the same “Mightier than thou and
the law…don’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights attitude”

This is painfully obvious as the prodigious amount of evidence on my web site irrefutably proves including
the cooperation of the RCMP.

The manner in which this complaint is being handled by both the Office of the Commission for Public
Complaints Against the RCMP and the Office of the RCMP Commissioner was predictable because it is
consistent with the entire operation of the government Organized Crime.

You must understand this exercise was initiated only to provide the last length of rope for you all to hang
yourselves with and I am not the least bit surprised you are not cognizant of it for you feel you have all the
loose ends tied up without a court in the land who would convict you without convicting themselves and
blowing the whole conspiracy wide open.

I realize you have control of the media but not the web site as I continue to get many hits every day.
The word is spreading to the people where it needs to be and there is no trial required as surely you must
know because it is being held publicly here and now providing you people all the irrefutable evidence and
your actions and responses are far more convincing than anything you may swear under oath with your left
hand on the Bible which means absolutely nothing to you people who do not give a damn about the
Constitution which recognizes the supremacy of God whose aspirations are to the well being of every
individual all being God’s children. Right?
For the record you are being offered the opportunity to distance your self from the conspiracy and given
the extraordinary seriousness of the situation concerning the wellbeing and safety of the moral majority
which are under siege at this moment it is incomprehensible that priority isn’t number one to this endeavor.

There is no middle ground; you are either clearly with the conspiracy or clearly with the law and the moral
majority where clear and decisive action is the only valid response.

This is the fairest trial ever held in Canada, or the world for that matter because you get to decide your
innocence or guilt and we the people will decide your fate.

We follow the “MODEL” set out for us by Confucius

“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”


Who are we?

199
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

This document will be found on http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-


rights-and-freedoms as usual with all the rest and of course e-mailed to my usual list which now includes
you.

We await your decision. For or against!!

The Charter Democracy Force is assembling the evidence in quick study form to efficiently and effectively
carry on business free of charge in service of the people being the people for the people

Yes really, quite a novel idea. Eh!

Friday December 21, 2007

Bob MacAdam of the RCMP Newmarket called around 2 PM and talked for about 15 minutes.

He has been on the case for 3 weeks but clarified not all the time as he has lots of other cases.
I mentioned that I was expecting the RCMP Commissioner’s 30 day status report which was due around
December 16 2007 but he didn’t know anything about that.

Bob said he is not investigating the conspiracy just the complaint.


“What’s to investigate?” I asked, “Did you talk to Sgt Steinebach…

200
He’s going to tell you I brought documents down to him about 7” thick evidencing government corruption
and conspiracy and he refused to take the documents and refused to investigate.”

“I had been e-mailing Michael Thomson the evidence but he wouldn’t respond.
Then I noticed on the RCMP web site that they wouldn’t accept documents by e-mail so I printed out the
files and took them down to the RCMP at Newmarket and eventually Sgt Steinebach met with me.”

After talking for about ½ an hour I asked the Sgt. if he knew me and he said yes, that the e-mail documents
I had been sending have been put into a file but they wouldn’t be investigating.

Just before my mother and I left I asked clearly and specifically if he was going to take the documents and
he said no he had them all on file but they won’t be investigating.

That’s my complaint. The RCMP won’t investigate and if he asks Sgt. Steinebach he will tell him the same
thing.
So what’s to investigate about the complaint?

He asked if I could drop down maybe next Friday to discuss the matter which I agreed to at first until I
asked if he had checked the evidence on the web site when he said no.
I asked why not? The instructions clearly stated the evidence was on the web site.

I want the government investigated and the evidence is irrefutable of the government conspiracy.
He mentioned again he was not investing the conspiracy just the complaint.

I told him to investigate the complaint he would have to study the evidence to see if it was a valid
complaint.
Is it trivia, frivolous or vexatious?

There is no need for me to drive down to Newmarket and he said okay but he may call me back.

201
I have sent 18 e-mails to the RCMP Commissioner since December 16 2007 when I
From: Pierre Leduc expected the status report and a number of them made mention of the due date so I wonder
why the 2008.01.02 was the one forwarded to you. This document is particularly germane
Date: 1/7/2008 3:45:04 PM Commission RCMP Complaints Dec. 27 2007.doc
To: frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca On December 21 2007 during
Cc: Diane Fauvelle An example of the incompetence that runs rampant
throughout which allows the success of the government a conversation with S/Sgt.
Subject: Fwd: Correction
Organized Crime. Bob MacAdam I told him the
It of course looks like the Complaints Commission is status report was due on
Good afternoon Mr. Gallagher, involved as well as the RCMP
December 16 2007 already
Commissioner
late and he had not even
Just to let you know that your correspondence dated 2008.01.02 was looked at the evidence on my
forwarded to me. I spoke with Sergeant Costa Dimopoulos this afternoon. web site yet.
He advised me that an update had been prepared and had been forwarded to
you recently. Even if 45 days from
Pierre Leduc
Please look into all these issues to clarify these contentious issues November 16 2007 45 days
Sincerely, I find it inane that a predetermined update stating nothing except the
would be December 31 2007
investigation is continuing despite the attempt to make it appear I am
uncooperative incomprehensible that it can’t be sent on time. More but didn’t get written until
Pierre Leduc, Insp. incomprehensible is that which all the evidence continues to prove. January 7 2008 the day you
RCMP - GRC state it was already sent which
Executive Assistant to the Commissioner / Adjoint exécutif du of course is not true as Bob
commissaire This is a very serious matter being dealt with told me on the 8th he still had
Office: (613) 993-0882 routinely in the incompetent manner I am familiar it and was going to be mailed
Cell: (613) 552-1884 with of government personnel having spent 10 that day.
Fax: (613) 993-0309 years with the province and 14 with City Toronto Please respond clarifying
e-mail: pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Tuesday January 8 2008

The update was not in the mail today so I phoned Sergeant Costa Dimopoulos and left a message to call me.
S/Sgt R.B MacAdam returned the call and I asked him when the status report was sent.
He said it’s already and it’s going out today.
I said Pierre Leduc had informed me on Monday the 7th by e-mail that the update had recently been sent.

He also mentioned it really doesn’t say much, basically that the investigation is on going.
He mentioned again that this is not the only case he is doing and he is not working on it all the time.
He did say he was looking at the evidence on my web site and it will take him 6 months to go through it.
He was having some difficulty zeroing in on what the main complaint is.

At first I suggested if he just looked at the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document he would know something is
wrong with the legal system with their members running it.

Then I suggested he start at the beginning and once he knew the crimes by Don Wilson my former tenant were
committed right during the ORHT hearing and not dealt with it the rest will fall into place.
I mentioned the filing false and misleading information an offense under s. 206(2) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997
and when he reads the document to the Toronto Sun he will know the crimes were committed including the fraud for
over $100,000.
Why wouldn’t the ORHT at least deal with the Tenant Protection Act offense?
It’s all a cover up of the fact the Ontario laws are not constitutional. That’s why the cover up.

I also suggested he look at the “Mad Glad mostly Sad Why?” document and he remembered passing by it.
In fact that is the place to start.

Anyway Bob seemed like he was getting the idea and said that what he needed was some help and did I mind if he
called again to be helped through it which I was only too pleased and I would gladly meet with him if he wanted to
discuss the evidence of the government conspiracy.
202
Received January 11 2008

I do not like that statement, “despite the fact I did not


wish to meet “ the investigation is continuing.
That infers I am not cooperating with the investigation.
Talk about turning things 180 degrees around.

2 ½ years I have been trying to get a government person


to cooperate and the same with RCMP as I was looking
for the delinquent status report.
I was of the opinion it was due about December 16 2007.
His reference to a 45 day interim report contradicts the
November 8 2007 from the Complaints Commission
where I accepted the November 16 2007 letter from the
RCMP as the letter of acknowledgement of receipt of
complaint due in 45 days. Which is correct?
Please respond clarifying.
203
The following e-mail addresses will be sent a copy of this document today January 17, 2008 which will be published
on the web site of the Charter Democracy Force under

which waits for the historical decision of Pierre Leduc Insp.RCMP – GRC Executive Assistant to the
Commissioner and the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot who has also been provided a copy of this document.

The Armed Forces have been provided the evidence of the government conspiracy and await along with the rest of
us to see if the RCMP Commissioner will act responsibly in support of the Constitution and the people as demanded
either stated or implied by the Charter guarantee to every individual of the moral majority bringing the identified
members of the immoral minority before the courts and justice of the people where punishment is demanded and
priority number one attentive to deterrence which is fundamental to the individual’s guaranteed protection as
provided by the Charter.

Cover letter

January 17, 2008

Urgent !!
Attention RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and Pierre Leduc Insp.RCMP – GRC Executive Assistant to the
Commissioner

See attachment

Immediate acknowledgement of receipt required.

Immediate response to the January 11 2008 e-mail sent to Pierre Leduc Insp.RCMP – GRC Executive
Assistant to the Commissioner required from both the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and Pierre Leduc
Insp.RCMP – GRC Executive Assistant to the Commissioner

Frank Gallagher

204
pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; attorneygeneral@jus.gov.on.ca;
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
Primetimecrime@gmail.com; webadmin@greenparty.ca;
info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org; edmonton@cba-alberta.org; cba@bccba.org; admin@cbanb.com;
cba-nl@nl.rogers.com; cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca; cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-
pei@isn.net; cba.sk@sasktel.net; cbayukon@internorth.com
ciec-ccie@parl.gc.ca;
ndpaoatlantic@ns.aliantzinc.ca; information@forces.gc.ca; ndpao-pacific@shaw.ca; ndpaocal@nucleus.com;
NDPAO@bellnet.ca; ndpao.mtl@videotron.ca; webmaster@forces.gc.ca;
AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca;
ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca; ascentive_newsletter@noreply.ascentive.com; ayala_disadvantage@hotmail.com;
admin@otla.com; atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca; anguswd@sen.parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca;
bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;
bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca; bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org; bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org; bergeron_hater_1976@hotmail.com;
buoyantly.ewing_1977@hotmail.com; BelleG@parl.gc.ca; bill@wgilmour.ca; complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca;
clgascon@fja.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; communications@ps.gc.ca; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
christine.elliott@pc.ola.org; city@thestar.ca; citydesk@tor.sunpub.com; comail@lsuc.ca; cgrech@yrng.com;
copelandj@scc-csc.gc.ca;
cdavis@relevantknowledge.com; Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca; charrf@sen.parl.gc.ca; coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca;
cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca; chapum@sen.parl.gc.ca; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca;
carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca; campbel@sen.parl.gc.ca; callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca
Day.S@parl.gc.ca; dwatch@web.net; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;
dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca; debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dinovoc-qp@ndp.on.ca; dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca; dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com;
dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca; damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca;
egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca; editor@tor.sunpub.com; ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org; elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;
dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com; dkristie558@toonear.info;
dallar@sen.parl.gc.ca; damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca; editor@tor.sunpub.com; editor@rd.ca;; francois-giroux@cas-
satj.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca; fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca; frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca; fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca; fountain.threapers1960@hotmail.com;
Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca
gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;
goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca; grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca; gore.outsnoring_@hotmail.com;
Hill.J@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;
hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca; horton@adlib.ca; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; info@chfc.ca;
info@olderwomensnetwork.org; info@ocsj.ca; info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca; info@ohrc.on.ca; info@libertarian.ca;
justice@socialjustice.org; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca;

205
jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; julia.munroco@pc.ola.org; jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca;
jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca; johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;
jorgensen.unresisting_@hotmail.com; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca;Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca; kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca;
lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;
lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca; lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca; losier@sen.parl.gc.ca; lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;
licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; Lussier.M@parl.gc.ca; Lake.M@parl.gc.ca; Laforest.J@parl.gc.ca;
mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org; machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca; massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca; meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca; mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca; merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca; mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca; munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca; mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca; McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;
nimhinfo@nih.gov; nejmcust@mms.org; prevention@ps.gc.ca; communications@ps.gc.ca;
mcknight.pycnodont@hotmail.com; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca; mphelps@otla.com; Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca;
nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca; ocap@tao.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;
Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca; pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca; pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca; prevention@ps.gc.ca; prognosticatingw371@mobilemessage.com; pwang@adni.net;
PoiliP@parl.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca; russem@sen.parl.gc.ca;
rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca; rattel@sen.parl.gc.ca; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;
spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca;
smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca; smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca; sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca; spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;
stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca; szwebmaster@yahoo.com;
support@besthotfilms.com; Symantec@reply.digitalriver.com; Sweet.D@parl.gc.ca;
terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca;
tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca; tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca; victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca;
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; vanlop1@parl.gc.ca; vanlop0@parl.gc.ca; webadmin@justice.gc.ca;
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; web@ps.gc.ca;
Williams.J@parl.gc.ca; Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca;
philreporter1989@yahoo.ca
editor@philreporter.com; sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
licia.corbella@calgarysun.com; info@vivelecanada.ca; nphlstatistician@hotmail.com.com;
press@transparency.org;
ti-can@transparency.ca; askgov@worldbank.org, sprayriver@yahoo.ca; newsroom@globeandmail.com;
news@citynews.ca; newsdesk@metronews.ca; share@interlog.com; admin@georginaadvocate.com;
admin@stouffvillesun.com

206
February 28, 2008

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of Crime Section
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Frank Gallagher
Keswick, On
Sergeant Roy Steinebach
franklyone@hotmail.com
roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Milton Detachment
Inspector Brian Verheul
brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Investigation of refusing to investigate


Government Organized Crime
Corruption and conspiracy
Your File 2007-1355445

Dear Bob, Roy and Brian

This is in response to Bob’s 30 day interim report dated February 21 2008 which involves all 4 of us.
(Copy attached page 8)

As you guys are well aware I have embarked on a most onerous and formidable task by chance as life
served me an abundance of lemons I have chosen to squeeze them into lemonade as it is just the right thing
to do leaving me with no other viable option due my unwillingness to accept “How it is”

That is due the fact of “How I am” which has a whole lot to do with my 40 year career in Legal Land
Surveying now retired, where I had began with the province of Ontario studying hard to make my way to a
management position in 1967. I was never a yes man because I understood the need to get the job done
right
as sworn to do unbiased in re-establishing property lines where they were originally placed assuring every
property owner got precisely what they were entitled to.

I was always conscience of costs to do a job and forever looking for better ways while not compromising
the integrity of the finished product.

I became known as fast Frank, which had nothing to do with my sex life although I was an easy touch that
way too.

What I discovered early was the majority struggled plenty to just do the job in routine manner as they just
simply did not have a full grasp of the laws and what they were actually trying to achieve.
They were satisfied to just gather as much evidence as they could and table it for their supervisors to make
the decisions where that was not my way as I would work on my own time to learn and sort things out.

207
It wasn’t long before I realized the supervisors were not all that which they would have you believe as they
all had different opinions citing clichés such as “Rules of best evidence” “Original evidence available
today which was found or set during an original survey” Priority of title” to name a few, but unfortunately
through conversation you find out they were confused as to the meaning of the terminologies and had
actually picked up their information as hand me downs from those who proceeded them.

The secret to keeping out of trouble in surveying is to make sure you have thoroughly searched for all the
available evidence both physical and documentary turning every rock making sure there is nothing
available for a subsequent survey to find to rebut your decisions and of course the validity of the evidence
was dependent on ones comprehension of the relative laws of survey practice.

So it was imperative that when you cited a cliché you understood it where often I would be up against the
entire staff on decisions I made due their inexperience and misinformed innuendo which propagate over
time.

Confidence is in the knowing what is right and knowing what is wrong which required you to listen well as
to what was being said and being able to explain the error of their ways.

The bottom line is when you have completed the job properly with all data being consistent with that
which was originally intended as documented it is most difficult to rebut.

I found early that a signature was the deciding factor and with each new supervisor who would dare to tell
me to pull the survey monuments and reset them according to his way of thinking after I had explained
how I derived at my decisions I simply said okay, I’ll write in my report that I have staked the properties
according to instructions by supervisor so and so against my advice and demand he sign the report which
makes the difference between man or mouse as they invariably walk away saying “Okay, leave it your
way”

I never had any repercussions in subsequent surveys made by others as you are either right or wrong and
the evidence remains to attest to the fact.

From the evidence which is documented and check measurements made to verify the data was recorded
accurately it remains forever irrefutable to stand alone against all who would stray from the truth.

Where a dispute is to be made a sound argument must be made citing laws, acts, rules and regulations,
whatever giving facts which may have been overlooked allowing for an impartial review of the evidence
to subsequently determine the validity of the dispute.

Biased arguments are soon identified to be precisely that and complete rejection with no sane argument at
all
is akin to a Pee Wee Herman scenario which may have some humour the first time showing but inane to
sound purpose.

Having said that I address the issue at hand where Confucius described it well 2500 years ago

“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the
words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY… finally I began to make out what
was written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE. “

208
Throughout the evidence I had provided to the RCMP up to November 8 2007 when I filed a complaint
with the “Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP” is a consistency of government
personnel proclaiming BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY in diversionary tactic
in unsuccessful attempt to avoid addressing the issues which is impossible without incriminating
themselves.

Each attempt was intended and believed to bring the matter to a close but instead has provided an
abundance of irrefutable evidence of their determination and consistency to cover up the issues without
actually addressing them.

The 2 part “Law Society of Upper Canada” document is symptomatic of the Government Organized Crime
of corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s of the moral majority whereas the Society have
adamantly stated or implied their members are not required to give a damn about the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights and have clearly stated their only obligation is to vigorously advance the
interests of their clients or in other words the interests of those who can afford their services.

They go on to state in matters of a complaint against one of their members evidence is irrelevant in any
shape or form whereas they are not required to validate a complaint made by their client to commence or
cause to commence proceedings against his or her adversary which causes undue hardship without due
cause.
If I were to file charges against a person with the police they would be required to provide reasonable
evidence to a Justice of the Peace or a judge to get a warrant to proceed against the person but that is not
the case with their lawyers who obviously benefit by the oversight drumming up business and in turn to
argue the point I would engage the services of one of their colleagues as they often refer to them as “My
friend”

The Society goes on to state they are not required to look at the supporting evidence of my complaint
against one of their members when concluding their innocence which is obviously a predetermined status
where justice is not their objective as clearly their purpose is to alleviate immediate pressure and to quash
all existence over time as it took them near 2 months after nudges from me to produce a decision from
them which could have been presented the same day given their decision is predetermined.
Of course it would readily appear so if they produced their decision that quickly so their decision is
delayed to appear well looked into.

On the other hand it could very well be as the evidence suggests they didn’t have a leg to stand on in
support of their members accounting for their ridiculous response in their predetermined members favour.

In actuality the proper decision according to evidence could have been reached in a maximum of two days
just by looking at the evidence which would have found their member guilty as charged, but that obviously
is contrary to their purpose where justice is not an option for them to entertain.

The evidence I have provided everyone in the AAAAAAAAAAAAALIST document published on my


web site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force stands alone irrefutably proving the Criminal act
of fraud was committed along with offences under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 before a judicator in a
building financed by the people of Ontario to dispense justice consistent with the Constitution in support of
the Charter guarantee equally to every individual without discrimination.

209
The various government departments and agencies who reviewed the evidence did so incoherent to the
evidence or in complete disregard of the evidence to come to the predetermined conclusion their
compatriots, (partners in crime) were innocent.

The truth is in the unwavering evidence which has been there for all to see published on the web sites after
being e-mailed to the people on the aforesaid AAAAAAAAAAAAA.LIST
At first the actions of the personnel referenced in the Lawyer Files 1-4 were incomprehensible but as I
endeavoured in my search for the truth as I am wont to do given my inherent discipline of my retired
career it became blatantly obvious of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy
which the evidence irrefutably proves.

The persistent consistency of all government personnel to not address the issues and replace it with
proclamations of BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY failed to satisfy the void
and in fact was deliberately orchestrated from the DOJ who pointed the finger at the Minister of Justice
and Attorney General of Canada in their letter of January 22 2007 clearly stating he is the governments
chief legal advisor. The Minister is appointed by the Prime Minister but ultimately the problem is deep
seated in the DOJ where the Ministers come and go as representatives of the elected PARTY IN POWER
where it is irrelevant as to which Party is in power with the Minister being a puppet of the DOJ.

The document “Mad Glad mostly Sad…WHY?” leaves many questions unanswered and the whole volume
of evidence unequivocally provides the answers needing only to be formalized by investigation beginning
with Lawyer Files 1-4 attentive to gathering all pertinent evidence which will ultimately lead to the
Ontario Attorney General who according to the “Roles and responsibilities of the Attorney General”
published on his web site is the chief executive officer of the legal council responsible to advise the
government personnel consistent with legalities pertinent to the Constitution and ultimately responsible for
the individual’s protection and society as a whole as per their constitutional rights.

It is immediately obvious there is no mention of the Charter in these writings, deliberate or not he is
responsible to assure due diligence to the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights but his
actions have been deliberately devoid of that responsibility in favour of the members of the Upper Tier
which includes himself as a members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who have clearly stated their
indifference to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, politicians who he is an elected member and
their affluent and influential friends who play prominent roles in their getting elected and their decision
making.

The evidence is overwhelming the guaranteed Charter rights of the individual are non existent tended to by
the Attorney Generals of both the Federal and Provincial Governments where their endeavour is to appear
to be legitimate consistent with the Constitution but ultimately their intent is to deceive as asserted by
Edmund Morgan referenced in the book by Jonathan Swainger which is deemed necessary in all forms of
government to deceive the people and in a democracy necessary to have the people believe they have a
voice and their elected representatives are the people for the people.

The success of charlatans is contingent on deceit but once the truth is known reality takes its natural
recourse.

The days of old of the elite over the peons have been outlawed with the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms promised by the Federal Government by the Constitution Act, 1982 and although I highly doubt
their intent was to actually support the individual’s rights they guaranteed, as clearly proven in the
evidence provided on my web sites they are ultimately bound to do so as it has been enacted into the

210
supreme law of Canada, the Constitution which all the heads of government and enforcement have sworn
to uphold.

It is the Law
The irony is their persistence to deception, confidence and arrogance has back fired with their ultimate
deception deceiving themselves leaving a preponderance of deceptions in their wake for all to see once
their deception is exposed for all to see where their success is dependent on not being caught as is the
initiative of all crooks
Their deception has been exposed to you as well as many pertinent members of the government and the
public all being privy to the exact same information and overwhelming evidence with not one member of
the government taking initiatives in support of the individual’s Charter rights which have been severely
compromised under the advisement of the DOJ and their figure head the Prime Minister appointed
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada who have taken advantage of their positions of trust to
ransack their own people for their personal interests and financial gain.

The bottom line is the Federal Government made a guarantee to every individual which they have failed to
demonstrate due diligence to the support which is a serious charge in itself but when you study the
evidence it is not through incompetence, oversight or neglect but predetermined and premeditated neglect
for the sole purpose of their financial benefit and personal interests causing illegal persecution upon the
individuals of the moral majority unbeknownst to the majority due the conspirator’s expertise of deception.

The laws, policies and standard procedures passed along by them are subject to meticulous scrutiny which
in particular includes the RCMP Act and other laws you operate under where you must have due regard for
the fact they have made every effort in an attempt to ensure their success.

The Charter provides the spirit of the Constitution and due regard must be attentive to
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental
or physical disability.
which concerns every individual equally where credence must be to that which is least likely to be
mistaken by humankind.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.

Given the truth as provided by themselves, being habitual liars and purveyors of deception who don’t give
a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, evidence when pointed at them one must look at
the sanity of adhering to any of their laws and policies that are obviously intent on the non-support of the
Charter guarantee which they are inherently morally and legally bound to support.

This humongous problem which I perchanced upon is now in your hands where a competent responsible
irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights is
prerequisite to the enforcement of the Constitution and the manner which you apply yourself will be
evident of your legal entitlement to the positions you hold in law enforcement where a sound
understanding must be prevalent.

211
There is simply no easy way out, the burden has been placed upon you to do was is right in accordance
with the law which recognizes the supremacy of God and the aspirations attributed to Him are documented
in the verbiage of the Charter where it is the sworn duty of all government personnel to see to it that the
sanctity of the Constitution is upheld for the wellbeing and safety of every individual is now in your hands.

I hope you comprehend the severity in depth.

I have attached a copy of an e-mail to Bob dated February 22 2008 which he has not responded to, once
again giving me serious doubt as to his intent to cooperate with me for the ultimate benefit of a moral
society as intended and demanded by the Charter. (See page 9)
The intent was to have him confirm that the web sites referred to in the original complaint where the
evidence is to be found
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
and the more organized site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force have been
corrupted where the documents are no longer assessable through the links provided.

I could not restore them as these sites and the majority of the others have been significantly rendered
useless with the commentary still available for all to see.

You have all been provided the evidence separately by e-mail anyway so it should not interfere with your
performance of your duties but for the record I have opened a new site “The CDF Documents”
http://groups.google.com/group/the-cdf-documents where the pertinent evidence is available.

I have not notified the government personnel on the AAAAAAAAAAAAList for obvious reason and you
3 are the only government personnel informed of this new site.

Of course should you require any more evidence or any help in understanding I would be pleased to help in
any way. Contact me at franklyone@hotmail.com

I would appreciate if you would all confirm the links have been corrupted on the aforementioned sites and
reply to this e-mail with your comment and acknowledging receipt of this document.

I would very much appreciate a copy of each of your formal reports which I would expect forthcoming if
you are on the side of the Law and the people it governs which is coincidental to my perseverance.

I have been completely open to you and in my point of view the entire government should be completely
open to the people as we now hear BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY spread to
accountability and transparency which couldn’t be demonstrated better than by putting it into application.

Surely there is nothing to debate where the Attorney General’s are supposedly on the side of the people
being elected by them to ensure the laws are administered and enforced consistent with the Constitution
consistent with the guaranteed Charter rights of every individual which are all one and the same.

The fact they have informed that I should get a lawyer indicates they are in conflict, not with the individual
being contrary to their legal responsibility having pitted me an individual against the entire resources of the
government in a debate that is not legally debateable and wouldn’t be necessary if they hadn’t advised
the government contrary to the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

212
If I was wrong about that which I allege, why wouldn’t they simply explain in an open transparent
accountable manner rather than continue their diversionary and deceptive tactics consistent with the
conspiracy.

This of course is their ultimate weapon to use all the government resources financed by all the individuals
against the individual one at a time who doesn’t have a hope in hell against such an attitude displayed by
the government.

What is immediately obvious is all the government personnel are required by law to be concerned about
the
rights of every individual, who would ultimately stand alone against the bullies if not for the Law that
guarantees them the equal protection and benefits of the Law which is ultimately the responsibility of the
government personnel employed under the auspices of the Constitution to provide the provisions as
guaranteed in by the Charter which is the responsibility of the Federal Government that made the
guarantee.

I remind you all that I am not against you but for you making every effort to remove the restraints set upon
you limiting your ability to perform your duty in service of the people of a moral society where immoral
inclination is the clear enemy of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

Frank Gallagher

213
214
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:franklyone@hotmail.com]
Sent: February 25, 2008 12:21 PM
To: 'robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'
Subject: RE: Investigation

Hi Bob

Thank you for your interim report dated February 21 2008.


I am pleased a formal response has been requested from Sgt. Steinbach and Inspector Verheul.

Please respond addressing the question I sent you last Friday. (copy below)

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:franklyone@hotmail.com]


Sent: February 22, 2008 11:09 AM
To: 'robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'
Subject: Investigation

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of Crime Section
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Hi Bob

Have you had any problems opening the links to the documents on the Charter Democracy Force?

Frank

215
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:franklyone@hotmail.com]
Sent: March 14, 2008 10:01 AM
To: 'PoiliP@parl.gc.ca'; 'robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca'; 'Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca'; 'rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org';
'randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca'; 'rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'russem@sen.parl.gc.ca';
'rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'rattel@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'; 'Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca';
'spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org'; 'speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org'; 'Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca'; 'Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca';
'smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca';
'stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'szwebmaster@yahoo.com';
'support@besthotfilms.com'; 'Symantec@reply.digitalriver.com'; 'swainger@unbc.ca'; 'Sweet.D@parl.gc.ca';
'terryoc2001@yahoo.ca'; 'tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca'; 'Toews.V@parl.gc.ca'; 'Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca';
'tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca'; 'Verner.J@parl.gc.ca';
'vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org'; 'vanlop1@parl.gc.ca'; 'vanlop0@parl.gc.ca'; 'webadmin@justice.gc.ca';
'warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org'; 'wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'whistleblower@ctv.ca'; 'web@ps.gc.ca';
'willis@forces.gc.ca'; 'Williams.J@parl.gc.ca'; 'Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca'; 'zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca';
'philreporter1989@yahoo.ca'; 'editor@philreporter.com'; 'sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca';
'licia.corbella@calgarysun.com'; 'info@vivelecanada.ca'; 'nphlstatistician@hotmail.com'; 'press@transparency.org';
'ti-can@transparency.ca'; 'askgov@worldbank.org'; 'sprayriver@yahoo.ca'; 'newsroom@globeandmail.com';
'news@citynews.ca'; 'newsdesk@metronews.ca'; 'admin@georginaadvocate.com'; 'admin@stouffvillesun.com';
'archbishop@archtoronto.org'
Subject: RCMP show on the road

March 13 2008 (See Attachment "Unisense March 13 2008")

RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot

Re: Your File 2007-1355445


Government Organized Crime
Corruption and Conspiracy

Dear Sir

As you are aware your office is presently investigating a complaint I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints Against
the RCMP on November 8 2007 Files PC-2007-2316 and PC-2007-2317 against two RCMP members who refused to
investigate Government Organized Crime of Corruption and Conspiracy evidence on my web sites
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society and http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-
rights-and-freedoms

Since a conversation I had with RCMP Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam on January 8 2008 to discuss the delinquent 30 day status
report which was three weeks late of compliance with the RCMP Act I created a new web site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force for Bob to make things easier with his investigation.

On Valentines Day one of my members informed me the links to the documents on these sites had been corrupted and I was
unable to restore them.

I have since informed your office of the new web site http://groups.google.com/group/the-cdf-documents where I provided new
links to the pertinent documents but should you require more evidence or if any are missing previously referenced please do not
hesitate to e-mail and I would be pleased to accommodate you in every way I can as you know.

Also as you know with no action having been taken as of yet the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy
continues and there are indications the conspiracy extends to your office and the Commission for Public Complaints Against the
RCMP which has been documented under the heading Royal Canadian Mounted Police on the
http://groups.google.com/group/the-cdf-documents web site.

I have now once again informed you of the on going Government corruption and conspiracy and request you include this
evidence along with that which you will find on new web site http://groups.google.com/group/unisense to aid you in concluding
that yes indeedGovernment Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy is alive and well in Canada to the humongous
detriment of the individual's of the moral majority where urgency is of the essence.

216
Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdamSergeant Roy Steinebach of the Newmarket detachment and Inspector Brian Verheul of the
Milton detachment have all been brought up to date and should be well studied on the evidence now as they have had it since
January 2006 as Roy informed me on October 18 2007 that he was aware of me and the evidence I had been e-mailing the
RCMP with Sgt. Michael Thomson's address which was kept on file.

I have attached another document "Unisense March 13 2008" which is also available on the aforementioned Unisense web site
http://groups.google.com/group/unisense and once again I request you read this and consider it in the ongoing investigation of
the Government Organized Crime which will be useful in climaxing your conclusion as to that which the evidence irrefutably
attests.

I reiterate there can be no logical reason to delay the commencement or the causing of a commencement of proceedings of a
spring cleaning of the Government corruption and conspiracy beginning with the government personnel referenced in Lawyer
Files 1-4 with intent to collect evidence proving they obstructed justice under the advisement of the former Attorney General
Michael Bryant.

From there it will take it's natural course leading to the DOJ and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the
Prime Minister who appointed him.

Every person who precluded them in their positions right back to the enactment of the Constitution Act1982 with the inclusion
of the Charter are implicated.

I understand this is a most onerous and formidable challenge beset upon you however you must remain attentive to the
seriousness of the situation and the humongous detriment to the individual's of the moral majority the conspirators placed upon
the people who have financed you all in pursuance of the moral society demanded by the Constitution which ultimately has been
passed to you due the deliberate neglect of the DOJ and their cooperatives to administer and enforce the law consistent with the
Constitution where priority one is to the support of the Charter guarantee to every individual equally attentive to deterrence of
the immorally inclined.

I can't help thinking about these most honourable people for they are all most honourable people and something about being
aware the Ides. Too bad that’s a Saturday

Friday will have to do, to march into the ORHT and find out who instructed them to tamper with the evidence and not record the
2nd day of the Tribunal hearing.

Who instructed them not to forward the evidence to the Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal
Affairs and so on like that as detailed in the "Mad Glad mostly Sad...Why? Document.

In can make the Saturday paper on the Ides

Your duty is clear.

God speed in your endeavors.

Sincerely

Frank Gallagher

217
Charter Democracy

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


Toronto Integrated Proceeds of
Crime Section
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

What you do not want done to yourself do not do to others

Recompense injury with justice


Dear Bob
and recompense kindness with kindness

Unisense March 21 2008

Reality is the TRUTH impervious to perception yet due to perception

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to
the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in
particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin,
colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

“Shall I teach you what knowledge is? When you know a thing to hold that you know it; and when
you do not know a thing to allow that you do not it. This is knowledge”

To see what is right and not do it is want of courage or of principle


By now you have confirmed what you have always known and face the greatest challenge of your life. That is to tell it
“How It Is”.
Over 2000 years ago Jesus set out to tell the people about God for sane and unselfish purpose just because he
knew what was right and needed to be done. War was obviously never about peace and simply can not be achieved
that way as there has always been the powers that be and their affluent and influential friends and the powers that
not be, the majority who eked out a living day by day doing their bidding. I read somewhere that democracies have
never lasted more than 200 years which is quite understandable given that it is founded on lies as is every form of
government being obviously necessary to get the populace to do their bidding making the rich richer and the poor
poorer which is as it has always been and “How It Is” now precisely how Edmund Morgan asserted as inferred in the
book by Jonathan Swainger who happens to be another recipient of the evidence I have been distributing.

218
The Law
Constitution Act, 1982
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

The supremacy of God and the rule of law

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters
within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest
Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within
the authority of the legislature of each province.

Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General (Ontario)

Responsibilities of Federal Attorney General presumably similar

Clearly the Attorney General’s are responsible for all matters regarding the Constitution and are responsible to guard the public
interest

Clearly the Law and the Charter guarantee are just ink on paper not worth the ink and the paper written on without enforcement and
clearly the criminal act of fraud and the filing of a false and misleading information with the ORHT, an offense under the Tenant
Protection Act, 1997 are the provincial legal systems obligation to deal with. Clearly it is difficult to have confidence in a legal system
that condones such crimes committed, documented, recorded and witnessed by their personnel during legal proceedings which they
are ultimately responsible for.

Clearly it is an offense to obstruct or interfere with a landlord attempting to get justice.

Clearly it is a criminal act to obstruct justice in the matter of the criminal act of fraud committed during provincial legal proceedings.
Offences
There are 34 offences in the Tenant Protection Act (TPA) that apply to residential tenancies.

This pamphlet sets out how to report an offence, who to contact and the available remedies.

Your Options

It is up to you whether or not to:

report an offence to the Investigation & Enforcement Unit; Clearly I exercised both options
and clearly they refused to comply
and/or

apply to the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal.

219
Tenant Protection Act, 1997

Offence

206 (1) Any person who knowingly does any of the following

6. Harass, hinder, obstruct or interfere with a landlord in the exercise of,


i. securing a right or seeking relief under this Act or in the court, or

(2) Any person who does any of the following is guilty of an offence:

1. Furnish false or misleading information in any material filed in any proceeding under this Act or provided
to the Tribunal, an employee or official of the Tribunal, an inspector, an investigator, the Minister or a
designate of the Minister.

When the ORHT and Dave Grech, Coordinator of the Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing refused to commence or cause to commence proceedings I applied to the
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Hon. John Gerretsen who refused to commence or cause to
commence proceedings

200. The Minister shall,


(a) monitor compliance with this Act;
(b) investigate cases of alleged failure to comply with this Act; and
(c) where the circumstances warrant, commence or cause to be commenced proceedings with respect to
alleged failures to comply with this Act. 1997, c. 24, s. 200.

I brought these issues to the Ontario Ombudsman who refused to commence or cause to commence proceedings.

I brought the issues to my MPP Julia Munro and the Premier of Ontario who also refused to commence or cause to
commence proceedings.

I brought these issues to the Attorney General Ontario who also refused to commence or cause to commence
proceedings.

I brought the issues to the York Regional Police, the OPP-Anti-Rackets and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police who all
declined to commence or cause to commence proceedings.

This has all been detailed in the document “Mad Glad mostly Sad ….WHY?” document and the 15 Lawyer Files

Clearly the evidence demonstrates there is something drastically wrong with the legal system requiring an investigative
authority to look into these issues to determine precisely what is going on, but alas there was nobody to be found
as clearly documented in my 2 ¾ years of taking on the project myself.

I downloaded the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms from the web and confirmed my suspicions that the legal
system was not synchronized with the Constitution Act, 1982 bearing no resemblance, accounting for all the absurdities
I have read and heard about through the media over the years where the government is involved.

Having been employed with different sectors of the government for 24 years of my 40 years in legal surveying having
already identified major problems of incompetence, inefficiencies and careless attitude and quite experienced in good
sound investigative practice in performance of my duties under the auspices of various Acts, Laws, Rules and
Regulations. Statutes and Evidence, BY-Laws, and so on I was up and running and just the person for the job.

220
I learned the inherent values of being competent, responsible irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to
purpose which was two fold.

(1) To locate property lines and property corners.


(2) To mark them out precisely where they belong in accordance to Law, unbiased ensuring every property
owner gets precisely what they are entitled to by Law

In this world of surveying every individual has precisely the same rights as everyone else and my job was to
ensure they get them without any obligation other than of course the usual fee from the client.
In carrying out services for the client I was not provided special privilege to deprive any of his or her
neighbours even if he or she was in dispute with a neighbour as to the position of a property line which has a
fixed position by Law even though it is invisible for anyone to see until marked out on the ground.

The thing with surveying is records are kept for eternal use held for all to see what evidence was found and
used, physical and documentary to establish and stake out property lines providing sufficient reference
measurements to easily re-establish the property lines and corners when the physical evidence is lost over time
through landscaping or neighbours who remove the monuments attempting to gain a little more land for
themselves.

People are like that you know, and the thing is you have to keep an eye on them, like hawks as a matter of fact
as I have come to know where opportunity presents itself it is invariably taken.

The surveyors themselves are regulated by the Ontario Land Surveyor Association where complaints can be
filed against their members where the members turn each other in when they are found to have incompetently
established property lines and corners where their records are available to all members to be scrutinized for the
efforts they made to retrace all available evidence to ensure the right conclusions.

When a discrepancy is discovered in the positioning of a property line it is incumbent upon the surveyor to
meet with the alleged errant surveyor to resolve the issue all being part of the job.

It is a small world in the surveying industry where you become familiar with the other surveyors work as you
are consistently using their field notes and survey records in performance of your duties and of course you are
competing with them on the open market.

There is nothing more frustrating than not to be able to trust another surveyor’s work having paid a nominal
fee for their records and then find their records are not up to par costing waste in time and money where profit
is a most significant factor.

It is this factor that incites many complaints against each other, where as those surveyors who allow money to
influence the quality of their survey often under price the jobs to get the work thereby undercutting other
surveyors who have also bid on the job but did not get the work.

That is the positive effect of money keeping the surveyors in line and well controlled having the fear of the
law being monitored by the Association where there are severe reprimands leading to loss of license to
practice on failure to comply.

That brings us back to the point at hand and the purpose for this exercise where the Government personnel run
rampantly incompetent devoid of responsibility due to the most significant factor having the opportunity to do
so being left unchecked from the top down where it is ultimately the responsibility of the DOJ under the
leadership of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada who is appointed by the incumbent
Prime Minister.
221
The Government personnel are human and ultimately they are subject to the inherent traits attributed to humans
which of course is why we have Laws to define the invisible limits of one’s entitlements that are evidenced
physically and documentarily where in Canada they are defined by the Constitution Act, 1982 and our invisible
limits of entitlement are clearly defined in the Charter quite specifically in

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or
mental or physical disability.

It is either stated or implied by the guarantee of the Charter made by the Federal Government in cooperation
with the Provincial Governments they will support the guarantee with competent responsible irreproachable
personnel of fortitude and conviction to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

They can not possibly be guaranteed otherwise and of course as it is with the ideology of Law and Order
if you do not have enforcement consistent with the Law you do not have Law and Order.

That is the present state of the nation, which my extensive investigation has revealed irrefutably
documented in the evidence I have provided the RCMP including you

Cause and Effect


Opportunity is the most significant factor where the Government is not only obliged to abide by the law but are
required to administer and enforce it fairly, consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights where they are both judge and jury of their competence to do so which is a proven
fact that is not possible or we wouldn’t be financing the entire legal system to administer and enforce it to
ensure people comply, which they invariably do not when opportunity presents itself.

Given that sanity is prerequisite and mandatory and the Government personnel are just as responsible to abide
by the law as everyone else they must be held responsible to abide by the law as well as everyone else in the
same manner as well as every one else.

It is not only the sane moral thing, but the legal thing as clearly stated

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters
within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest
Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the
authority of the legislature of each province.

Not only is it insane to have the Politicians and the administers and enforcers of the Law intermeshed as
it is in noncompliance with the Constitution either stated or implied.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with
the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

The Department of Justice must have absolute autonomy being biased to the Law attentively focused
ensuring it is administered and enforced consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights equally.

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception.


222
Only when reality is fully grasped can it be realistically converted to the Ideal, which has been guaranteed by
the Charter, the dominant entity of the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution which recognizes the
supremacy of God where the aspirations attributed to Him are known best by Jesus who said
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”.
No words capture the spirit of the Law better being consistent with the verbiage of s. 15 (1) which must be read
in the spirit as well as the letter.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or
mental or physical disability.

The words of Jesus are derivatives of the words of Confucius who preceded him by 500 years stating

“What you do not want done to yourself do not do to others.” having the
foresight to complement that addressing the issue when people do not comply.
“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”

It is only sane with nothing to debate but invariably those people who are not so inclined will until they are
blue in the face turning the moral majority’s red causing undue stress and duress instigating chaos and unrest.

I have identified the source of these people in the 2 Part “Law Society of Upper Canada” document which
unequivocally proves their unscrupulous nature and their ineptness to perform in a manner conducive to justice
in every sense of the sane version of the word where their members are not required to give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and their only obligation is to the source of money as they vigorously
advance their clients interest. Of course, being those people with money.

Derogatory evidence detrimental to their cause is irrelevant and mentally discarded as they pursue their
interests with fortitude and conviction oblivious to the hopelessness and despair they leave in their wake
uncontested with the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada being an elite member of their
Society and mentally onside with them or vice versa.

Given their unscrupulous nature irrefutably identified as they not only stated it but demonstrated it in practice
as they made their decision regarding my complaint against their member inconsistent with any semblance of
sanity which could be associated with justice consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights which they stated or implied they do not give a damn about.

The book by Jonathan Swainger, which makes reference to the book by Edmund Morgan who asserts the
success of any form of Government, is dependent on their adeptness to deceive the populace and in a
democracy it is necessary to have the people believe they have a voice and their representatives are the people
for the people.

This ideology is consistent with the unscrupulous nature of the Law Society of Upper Canada that extends to
its members who have infested and infected the entire legal system being inevitable with no viable means to
control them.

The Charter is notably absent in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” Ontario and
decidedly absent in the modus operandi of the entire Government Legal System under the advisement of the
Attorney Generals who are ultimately responsible for the Government Organized Crime of corruption
223
and conspiracy perpetrated against the individual’s of the moral majority precisely adverse to their legal obligations
having been successful due the extraordinary opportunity advantaged them with no one to contest.

The opportunity has clearly been identified and motive blatantly obvious as the rich continue to get richer and the poor
continue to get poorer documented by statistics Canada.

The Government personnel are indeed consistent with the democracy defined in the Jonathan Swainger book, which in no
way states it is legal or morally correct for ultimately when they are caught they are no different than any other
syndicated Organized Crime based on deception.

Much more important is the fact that ordinary democracy based on –the rule of law- as defined in the “Roles and
Responsibilities of the Attorney General” put to paper prior to the enactment of the Constitution in 1982 is legally passé
being inept to support the guarantee equally to every individual as defined in the Charter.

Prior to the 1982 enactment of the Charter it is defined as that most elusive concept-the rule of law- a well established
legal principle hard to easily define which protects the individual and society as a whole.

This is indicative of their unscrupulous ways prior to the enactment of the Charter, which continues to day as the
evidence irrefutably shows they have not changed the status quo decidedly incompetent to support the Charter guarantee
and the reason is obvious.

That would be in direct conflict with their illegitimate purpose to ransack the populace.

Evidenced in their complicated legal system, which serves the members of the legal profession and their entwined
political and affluent and influential friends to the humongous detriment of the people of the moral majority where justice
is neither available nor affordable.

In conclusion, all that has been stated has irrefutably been proven, well documented and provided to the Government
personnel whose e-mail addresses are published in the AAAAAAAALIST document published on “The CDF Documents
“ web site http://groups.google.com/group/the-cdf-documents which provides links to other associate sites and links to
other pertinent evidence.

The aforementioned Government personnel have also been provide the new site addresses and have been requested to
deal with the issues contained within, but have notably done nothing, being consistent with the Government Organized
Crime of corruption and conspiracy that existed on November 8 2007 when I registered a complaint with the Commission
for Public Complaints Against the RCMP.

It would be inane, although consistent with the conspiracy, not to consider all evidence available of the Government
Organized Crime provided and referenced to at the time of filing the complaint and after which includes this document
which is published on the “Unisense” web site http://groups.google.com/group/unisense as “Unisense March 19 2008.”

In addition to that which has been published there is a preponderance more not published dwarfing in numbers that on the
sites but has been provided to Government personnel at random irrefutably supporting a number of charges which could
be laid but that which has been published is significant to purpose clearly identifying the Government Organized Crime
and the prominent members irrefutably implicated.

Once again I inform you all especially you Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam presently and soon to wrap up your exhaustive
study of the evidence, Sergeant Roy Steinebach, Newmarket detachment and Inspector Brian Verheul, Milton
detachment whom I have been persistently and consistently proliferating with the evidence and insight into the Law with
the initiative to remove them from the spell of the Fiction of the Attorney General and the Laws, Acts, Rules and
Regulations, Policies whatever set out by him and his predecessors consistent to the Fiction and deception but decidedly
inconsistent with the Constitution which is the Law they must use to determine the validity of my complaint where every
effort will be made by the conspirators to keep them in line cooperating with them and the conspiracy. I remind you
again.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with
the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
224
The entire government and legal system has been financed by the people to operate in the public’s interests
where every individual is required by Law to comply with the Law being particularly responsible for their own
actions thereby being responsible to the public’s interest whereby doing just that as inferred in the words of
Jesus “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

Under the Charter attentive to the support of the guarantee the interests of every department, agency, the
Crown and all those under the advisement of and the responsibility of the Attorney General is consistent with
that of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter where every person must comply and the government
personnel involved in the legal system ensure we comply by dispensing due punishment equally attentive to
deterrence which must take priority intent on prevention where predictable is preventable.

The ultimate purpose of any Law must be consistent to the Constitution with priority to every individual’s
rights and Government personnel must be attentive to the competent responsible irreproachable application of
it in continuity of fortitude and conviction with every Government person watching the other to ensure the
consistency, vital to the wellbeing, safety and entitlements of every individual as guaranteed.

Once again the evidence irrefutably proves the present legal system under the advice of the Attorney General’s
is deliberately incompetent and irresponsible to legitimate purpose and must be brought to account.

The analysis leads to the obvious conclusion the Government combined with the DOJ is predictably
obtrusively inept to legitimate purpose being conducive to Government Organized Crime against the moral
majority and as they say, that which is predictable is inevitable and the evidence irrefutably proves it.

The resolve as previously stated is to the restructuring of the legal system first giving definite meaning to Law
and Order letting every individual know, no matter who they are must comply with the Law and those people
provided the trust and the authority to administer and enforce it having been granted extraordinary power and
tremendous opportunity to abuse it must be severely punished when found in noncompliance and those caught
in a conspiracy extensively punished being more difficult to be caught and more apt to cause more damage.

The DOJ has been irrefutably proven to be not in the best interest of the public’s interest while under the
authority of the political forces being akin to leaving the crook to mind the store and therefore must be
segregated immediately with absolute autonomy.

The people must have a completely independent agency with the authority to initiate proceedings against any
Government Department, Agency, DOJ, Police Services who fail to perform their duties in competent
responsible irreproachable manner where every individual is responsible to act in such a manner with due
respect for every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which are absolutely equal to their own.

It is the Law
The January 22 2007 letter from the DOJ on pages 35 and 36 of the “Government Correspondence compiled
September 1 2007” document proves irrefutably the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is
responsible for the actions of the Government personnel as chief legal advisor and has admitted they are of the
misconception the Government Legal System has been financed specifically for them to debate any individual
who dares come looking for their guaranteed Charter rights which are nonexistent under their system as
irrefutably proven and documented by various departments that are purported to be there for the people and
decidedly not where their main purpose is to appear to be there for the people being part of the Fiction of the
Attorney General while providing their friends jobs to the ultimate waste of tax payers money.

The ultimate difference can be determined by observation where the intent of appearing to do the job
invariably does not get the job done which has left my issues unattended.

225
Jesus died for a purpose as did so many but does anyone actually know WHY 2000 years later?

Those who truly fear God are not particularly adept to the ways of truth, facts and reason where I suspect the majority
meet at the churches to socialize, perhaps to give themselves an unjustified boost of morality or a false sense of security
whatever, but it is not the belief in God but the acting in the ways of God that counts.

Believing and waiting for Him to do something is as inane as waiting for Him to serve our daily bread or our legal system
to dispense legitimate justice.

He is there to define the way of life we must live to exist in harmony side by side on earth as it is in one’s perception of
Heaven, which is not rocket science but fundamental within the grasps of any sound mind able to reason.

Nevertheless if it keeps one’s perception on side with the Law in respect of others and their rights, whose to fault them
unless of course if they care to discuss the matter with people like me who are respectful to truths which are supported by
facts.
Invariably within a minute of such a conversation there are too many questions not answered not that they have missed
any lessons or not necessarily incapable of reasoning things out, they just feel the need to have something they cqn
believe in that can not be realistically proven to not exist however I find it akin to talking to an invisible rabbit or friend
which may well provide them some comfort or purpose but I’d rather they do it when they are by themselves. It is a little
eery if you know what I mean, not that I have many friends that do, and not that there is anything wrong with that.

The only way to be sure that everyone is in harmony, on side with the spirit of the Law and God is to administer and
enforce the Law consist with the intent in the spirit of God who is recognized as supreme conducive to every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights exerting every effort doing justice to the spirit.

If I could just harness the power of these religious spirits to the initiatives of UNISENSE where instead of praying and
believing to an arena that does some good they would help us convince the Government personnel to restructure the legal
system consistent with the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, thereby dealing with the problems at the root.

The legal system thrives on the symptoms of their deliberate incompetence to deal with all issues at the root where the
evidence on my web sites irrefutably proves the numerous Government Departments and Agencies I addressed over the
passed 2 ¾ years have done nothing to the resolve intent on not doing so.

Having said that I will change the name of the UNISENSE site to the “Church of Universal Unisense” based on the
ideology

“The Lord helps those who help themselves” 226


Credence must be to that which is least apt to be mistaken by humankind
The long weekend is happening which you all undoubtedly know.
Quite apropos providing the opportunity for a little thought, for after 2000 years surely we know well of Jesus and what
he would have for us all.

His quest and ultimate responsibility had been passed onto you, having been financially blessed for the privilege to.
administer and enforce the Law consistent with the aspirations attributed to God, which have been put to words in the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

You people have failed miserably in defiance of the spirit of the Law and God betraying the trust assigned in His name
to guard the people.

Have a happy Easter and perhaps you will find a little time to reflect on the ways of Jesus, why he died, and why you
have a long weekend off with pay.

Jesus will be waiting for you when you come back to work where he will be found as the spirit of the “Church of
Universal Unisense” being Tothe
Help We Riseshowing
bodyOurselves
and soul inwith the
the spiritSon
ofway
us the the to
Lord
our salvation.

You needn’t fear him if you are one with the spirit of the “Church of Universal Unisense” possessed of the spirit

God has come a long way since Jesus spoke of Him finding His way to the Canadian Constitution being recognized as
most supreme where His ways have been enacted into Law in 1982 and the Government personnel having had more
than ample time to eradicate immoral inclination and serve in the ways of our Lord as defined and demanded by the
supreme Law of Canada, the Constitution where God is supreme.
Jesus has done his part and now it is up to the people to do theirs and that they will under the auspices of the
Constitution in its spirit consistent with that of our Lord in the spirit of the “Church of Universal Unisence”

God be with you

Frank

March 30 2008

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of Crime Section
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580

227
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sergeant Roy Steinebach


roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca www.cdf.name

Frank Gallagher
Milton Detachment
Inspector Brian Verheul
brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Investigation of refusing to investigate


URGENT
Government Organized Crime
Corruption and conspiracy
Your File 2007-1355445

Dear Bob, Roy and Brian

There is no way the governments can cover their asses now and the whole world is involved so perhaps
they will understand now.

I have handed you the irrefutable evidence, quite obvious of the traditional unscrupulous ways of the
powers that be of State and Church in persistent pursuit of wealth and power catering to the affluent and
influential scratching each others back so to speak in the inherent two tiered system as they conspire
against the people of the Lower Tiers manipulating the market having the obvious opportunity left
unchecked.

I have stated the evidence is every where in reality to see for those who will see.

It has been all over the media and visible at the gas pumps and at the grocery stores.

I write to you because you know the RCMP Commissioner being a Deputy Minister under the Minister of
Public Safety Stockwell Day appointed by the Prime Minister Stephen Harper who appointed the Minister
of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is in on the conspiracy along with the others mentioned as the
evidence referenced on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name irrefutably proves and you
have had cause to study it and should be up to speed.

There no longer is time for you to dilly dally around as the people of the Lower Tier, the moral majority
are in clear and present danger under assault as I write and when you open the link below you will read as
a direct result of illegal actions taken and being taken by the powerful corporations here and around the
world with the cooperation of the powers that be of State and Church have caused or allowed to happen the
murdering of innocent people through starvation as a direct result of their unscrupulous ways as the people
of the Lower Tier in Canada owe heavily to the banks, choked by increasing utility and heating costs with
their pocket money being scooped at the gas pumps with rising food costs soon to accelerate as food vital
to their survival comes scarce only to be available to the people of the Upper Tier who can afford it, it is
far more than circumstantial evidence given all that the prodigious amount of evidence I have provided
you proves.
You have more than reasonable cause to act on behalf of the people to pit a halt to the atrocity without a
warrant because there is no legitimate person to give you one being the enemy of the people which can not

228
be more obvious than now and we the people of the Lower Tier do not care to wait for you to deal with the
symptoms whereas we demand you get to the root of the problem before our demise.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms demands you support every individuals guaranteed Charter
rights where every individual has the right to equal protection and benefits before and under the law where
priority is to deterrence attentive to the predictable being preventable where the ideal is to protect us prior
to be victimized because we see no way justice can be served after we are dead and we would prefer to see
it while we are alive and well in this life.

The governments are fully aware what is happening and they have purported to look into the oil situation
and claim there is nothing they can do.

Obviously they will claim the same for the food situation just as obvious as they have created or allowed
the situation to happen.

People have been starving to death for years as they stood by claiming they were concerned and doing
everything they can do while they were in on the scheme to cause the very thing they purport they couldn’t
find a way to deal with.

Strange they are the powers that be only when they want to be.

Your duty is clear.

The truth must get to the people so they can be prepared to spank their kids in the Armed Forces if they
will not stop behaving like kids and grasp hold of reality.

We need them home here to straighten things out and when we have tidied up here we will direct them at
our true enemy’s world wide giving them something worthwhile to die for.

If they do it right standing with the people it is a concept that could spread world wide.

http://groups.google.com/group/venomous-snakes-spiders-powers-that-be-of-state-and-church-

Frank Gallagher

PS

Test your skills by first tracking down the interpreter.

229
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:JesusDirect@sympatico.ca]
Sent: April 5, 2008 4:20 AM
To: 'gordiegosse@ns.aliantzinc.ca'; 'gouchele@gov.ns.ca'; 'hurlburr@gov.ns.ca'; 'kentbj@gov.ns.ca';
'man@gov.ns.ca'; 'mmacdonald@navnet.net'; 'premier@gov.ns.ca'; 'john.macdonell@ns.sympatico.ca';
'econmin@gov.ns.ca'; 'clarriemla@ns.aliantzinc.ca'; 'macleoaw@gov.ns.ca'; 'joanmasseymla@ns.aliantzinc.ca';
'stephenmcneil@ns.aliantzinc.ca'; 'marilynmoremla@ns.aliantzinc.ca'; 'min_dnr@gov.ns.ca';
'percy.paris@ns.aliantzinc.ca'; 'charlieparkermla@ns.aliantzinc.ca'; 'cportermla@ns.aliantzinc.ca';
'preyra@eastlink.ca'; 'mhraymondmla@eastlink.ca'; 'samsonmp@gov.ns.ca'; 'tirmin@gov.ns.ca';
'graham@grahamsteele.ca'; 'streatjl@gov.ns.ca'; 'mlataylor@eastlink.ca'; 'theriahe@gov.ns.ca';
'junior@tartannet.ca'; 'whalendc@gov.ns.ca'; 'davidawilsonmla@eastlink.ca'; 'wilsond@gov.ns.ca';
'tzinck@ns.aliantzinc.ca'; 'Shawn.Graham@gnb.ca'; 't.j.burke@gnb.ca'; 'John.Foran@gnb.ca';
'Victor.Boudreau2@gnb.ca'; 'Denis.Landry2@gnb.ca'; 'donald.arseneault@gnb.ca'; 'Jack.Keir2@gnb.ca';
'ronald.ouellette@gnb.ca'; 'Rick.Doucet@gnb.ca'; 'MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca'; 'Hedard.Albert2@gnb.ca';
'mary.schryer@gnb.ca'; 'wally.stiles@gnb.ca'; 'ed.doherty@gnb.ca'; 'kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca'; 'roland.hache@gnb.ca';
'carmel.robichaud@gnb.ca'; 'greg.byrne@gnb.ca'; 'Stuart.jamieson@gnb.ca'; 'eugene.mcginley@gnb.ca';
'sprucegrovesturgeon.stalbert@assembly.ab.ca'; 'fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo@assembly.ab.ca';
'highwood@assembly.ab.ca'; 'calgary.glenmore@assembly.ab.ca'; 'laclabiche.stpaul@assembly.ab.ca';
'calgary.west@assembly.ab.ca'; 'vermilion.lloydminster@assembly.ab.ca'; 'medicine.hat@assembly.ab.ca';
'stony.plain@assembly.ab.ca'; 'fortsaskatchewan.vegreville@assembly.ab.ca';
'dunvegan.centralpeace@assembly.ab.ca'; 'dunvegan.centralpeace@assembly.ab.ca';
'webmaster@legassembly.sk.ca'; 'info@legassembly.sk.ca'; 'communications.justice@justice.gouv.qc.ca';
'george.abbott.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'robin.austin.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'harry.bains.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'pat.bell.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'bill.barisoff.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'bill.bennett.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'iain.black.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'harry.bloy.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'shirley.bond.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'jagrup.brar.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'gordon.campbell.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'premier@gov.bc.ca';
'ron.cantelon.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'ida.chong.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'raj.chouhan.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'tom.christensen.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'david.chudnovsky.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'murray.coell.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'rich.coleman.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'katrine.conroy.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'gary.coons.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'david.cubberley.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'mike.dejong.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'corky.evans.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'kevin.falcon.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'mike.farnworth.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'rob.fleming.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'scott.fraser.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'guy.gentner.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'stan.hagen.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'sue.hammell.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'colin.hansen.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'randy.hawes.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'sindi.hawkins.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'dave.hayer.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'gordon.hogg.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'john.horgan.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'al.horning.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'olga.ilich.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'carole.james.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'dan.jarvis.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'maurine.karagianis.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'leonard.krog.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'kevin.krueger.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'jenny.kwan.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'harry.lali.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'richard.lee.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'blair.lekstrom.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'john.les.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'norm.macdonald.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'dennis.mackay.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'lorne.mayencourt.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'joan.mcintyre.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'richard.neufeld.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'john.nuraney.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'wally.oppal.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'barry.penner.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'mary.polak.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'chuck.puchmayr.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'bruce.ralston.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'linda.reid.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'claude.richmond.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'gregor.robertson.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'val.roddick.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'douglas.routley.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'john.rustad.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'michael.sather.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'nicholas.simons.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'bob.simpson.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'shane.simpson.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'ralph.sultan.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'carole.taylor.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'diane.thorne.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'rick.thorpe.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'claire.trevena.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'john.vandongen.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'katherine.whittred.mla@leg.bc.ca';
'charlie.wyse.mla@leg.bc.ca'; 'john.yap.mla@leg.bc.ca'
Subject: New web sites

230
Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of Crime Section
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Please be advised of new web sites
Links provided in attached document

Until you are of “The Spirit” of the aspirations of God


The spirit of the Constitution, and the Charter
The sprit of the individuals of the moral majority who have a vested interest in “The Spirit”
that guarantees their individual guaranteed Charter rights

All documents addressing “The Spirit” are relevant to your investigation due the obvious fact
we cannot have a person of the evil spirit in on the conspiracy, investigating it can we?

I am making effort I am aware at present that I am capable of where attentiveness must be to prevention.

There is plenty of time after the fact which I will use most productively but now takes center stage where I
demonstrate due diligence above and beyond what would be considered my part when you are
financed by the people to perform a duty which they naively believe you are there for them.

Ya, no kidding!! Can you believe?

Frank

PS
You have not yet responded to inform me if the links to the documents have been corrupted as requested a few
times in previous e-mails.

I cannot help but think you are not the competent responsible, irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction
necessary to assure the individual’s Charter rights are being supported as guaranteed.

It seems to me such a person would be most appreciative of the information I provided you of the incompetence of
the system to protect the individuals who would be most appreciative if you were such a person.

On the other side of the coin we………oh, you know. It is rather obvious just as obvious as government corruption
and conspiracy you are studying the evidence for validity.

You will know by now the issues are even more serious leading to the powers that be of State and Church and in
fact I have a response from the Archbishop of Toronto who has either stated or implied he doesn’t give a damn
about the individuals of the moral majority.

I am not suggesting you look into the Church matter and I am just giving you a heads up in matters of “The Spirit”
where you can see how it all fits together and extends to all governments world wide.

Where did you go Bob? To buy a plane ticket to a southern destination to investigate their government to confirm
that to be true?

Just deal with the issues I originally presented you in “The Spirit” I have made every effort to assist you with that and
the rest will take care of itself.

Take care of the pennies in Lawyer Files 1-4 and the dollars will take care of themselves.

231
The ominous and formidable challenge of exposing and deposing the Despots

of the
Law Society of Upper Canada
etal

Irrefutable evidence of Government Organized Crime provided by the

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

The Charter Democracy Force commenced an investigation into improprieties of the Ontario government
on August 10 2005 and wrapped it up in October 2007 resulting in a prodigious amount of evidence
irrefutably proving the office of the Ontario Attorney General and the office of the Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada, with the cooperation of the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada
have conspired against the Canadian people by structuring an illegitimate legal system designed for the
distinct purpose of ransacking the Canadian Society for the specific benefit of the members of the Law
Society to the utmost detriment of the individuals of the moral majority being the people of the Lower Tier
favouring the people of the Upper Tier catering to the affluent and influential who work hand in hand with
them, scratching each others back so to speak for wealth and power.

Under the guise of providing justice under the auspices of the Constitution Act, 1982 they adamantly
refuse to support the individual’s rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
whereas it is their responsibility to do so as the government’s chief legal advisors defined in the “Roles and
Responsibilities of the Attorney General” which was downloaded from the Ontario web site and a copy is
available in Lawyer File # 7 published on the Charter Democracy Force web site.

This evidence was provided as acquired, to the RCMP by e-mail since January 2006 and on October 18
2007 having not responded noticed on their web site that they would not accept evidence by e-mail. I
delivered copies of the evidence to the RCMP Newmarket head quarters where Sergeant Roy Steinebach
met with my mother Edythe and I for an hour.

About a half hour into our conservation, after realizing he was not going to accept the evidence I had
brought and had refused to investigate government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy I asked if
232
he knew of me and he replied yes, that he was familiar with the folder they had opened where they filed
the evidence I had been e-mailing the RCMP using Inspector Michael Thomson’s e-mail address. He
confirmed he also had a copy of the recording of the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal hearing I had
delivered to the RCMP Newmarket headquarters in December 2005.

Before I left I asked him to confirm that he would not take the evidence because he had it available to him
on computer file and he had a copy of the recording. He confirmed the RCMP would not be investing
government organized crime as requested and we departed leaving it at that.

Sergeant Roy Steinebach had provided me with Inspector Brian Verheul’s name of the Milton RCMP
headquarters and I e-mailed him using the Michael Thomson address as confirmed by Roy, requesting he
investigate.

Having not heard from him on November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints
against the RCMP and received a letter of confirmation from the Commission dated the same day and was
informed my complaint had been forwarded to the RCMP Commissioner.

On January 8 2008 I telephoned Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam, who was assigned to investigate my
complaint, to inquire the whereabouts of an interim report that was overdue by three weeks.

At that time he requested some direction as to how to approach the evidence which was published on two
web sites referenced in the complaint and a couple of days later I informed him of the Charter Democracy
Force web site where I published the evidence with some semblance to order easier understood.

On February 14 2008 I was informed by a member that the links to the evidence on both of the original
web sites and the Charter Democracy Force site were corrupted and not being able to correct them I
created the CDF Documents web site and provided links to the evidence there and informed Bob.

I have since removed the commentary on the two original web sites and copied to files closing the sites but
I have managed to reactivate the links on the Charter Democracy Force site and informed Bob.

At this time the evidence is available to review on the Charter Democracy Force and the CDF Documents
web sites.
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
http://groups.google.com/group/the-cdf-documents

RCMP Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam stated in his April 21 2008 interim report that I would receive the
“Letter of Final Disposition” within 30 days as to their opinion of the validity of the evidence.

It is predictable and presumed will be negative with the RCMP investigating themselves especially since
the RCMP Commissioner had been provided the evidence prior to the complaint and refused to respond.

I suspect given the serious issues involved in the complaint the Commissioner was originally consulted
about the evidence I had e-mailed using the Michael Thomson e-mail address and it was he who declined
to investigate the government corruption.

After all, the RCMP Commissioner position was converted to Deputy Minister by Brian Mulroney in 1984
and there is still the Mulroney/Schreiber Airbus affair to deal with.

233
The Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day has authority over the RCMP Commissioner and he
responded to the evidence on November 2 2007 quite negatively consistent with the conspiracy and a copy
of his e-mail can be found in my response to him, document “Stockwell Day November 3 2007” published
on the CDF Documents web site.

I had also brought up the matter of the RCMP Pension Fund scandal which the Standing Committee on
Public Accounts was looking into and found problems with the upper echelon of the RCMP but when it
was linked to the DOJ the Standing Committee was ordered to sit on it as Stockwell Day explains it would
be a waste of taxpayers money when they could deal with it cheaper in another manner which turned out to
be a Task Force and there Report made no mention of the DOJ confirmed by Staff Sergeant Bob
MacAdam, which of course was no surprise because that is their modus operandi obviously not wanting to
let them proceed to a PUBLIC INQUIRY where the Truth will come out of the government organized
crime of corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s of the Lower Tier.

Confucius described his efforts 2500 years prior

“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
“BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEUOSNESS and MORALITY…finally I began to make out what was written
between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE.”

They are using the “Accountability and Transparency” ploy now but I have tested various offices created
under the Federal Accountability Act, 2006 but with no positive results similar to that which I had received
from the Ontario Ombudsman which is purportedly an independent agency at arms length of the
government which they advertise as an agency for the people to file complaints about improprieties of the
government.

The “Ombudsman” document published on the aforementioned web site proves they have very limited
authority and their response to the evidence was absurdly incompetent as I suspect they consulted the
Attorney General or his agents the Crown Attorneys and I suspect he has been involved since the
beginning, which caused the Force to investigate.

It is the responsibility of the Attorney General to advise all government departments and agencies, which
hardly makes the agencies independent, but the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Hon. John
Gerretsen states in his response found in Lawyer File # 3 that he can not intervene with the ORHT
decision, which is obviously bull because he is responsible to monitor compliance with the Tenant
Protection Act, 1997 and the ORHT operates under the Act.

Hon. John is advised by the Attorney General and so are the ORHT and the Ombudsman and I have no
doubt the Attorney General is behind the entire conspiracy.

It is also prudent to mention he or his Crown Attorneys advise the police, however the police must file the
charges and then it is up to the Attorney General as to whether or not to proceed with the charges.

Obviously he has the entire system in his pocket and available to see in the “Roles and Responsibilities of
the Attorney General.

You will note there is no mention of the Charter in the Attorney Generals “Roles ……….”

234
See Lawyer Files 1-4 and 7 for detail and document “Mad, Glad…mostly Sad, Why?” which takes you
from the beginning with many questions still unanswered indicative of the conspiracy.

The evidence of the original crimes of fraud committed on June 30 2005 by my former tenant at an ORHT
hearing witnessed and recorded by the judicator in a public building financed by the people to administer
justice consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights can be
found in the 2 Part Toronto Sun document published on both the aforementioned web sites, which is
irrefutable that the crimes were committed and even recorded in progress.

The ORHT not only declined to commence or cause to commence proceedings, but also removed part of
the conversation on the recording obstructing justice and tampering with evidence.

They are required to commence proceedings under the Tenant Act and obviously under the Charter where
the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of protection are at stake and punishment due the crime is
priority one in deterrence where the predictable is preventable.

I reiterate this is further detailed in the “Mad, Glad…mostly Sad, Why?” document.

The York Region Police have informed me the evidence in the 2 Part Toronto Sun document does not meet
an invisible line they refer to as the “Threshold” which they determine is the line needed to be met to
proceed to the criminal court.
See Lawyer File # 9

The evidence is irrefutable and impossible to imagine what other evidence I could possibly have to meet
this particular invisible line when I repeat the evidence is thorough and conclusive of his guilt.

They have refused to answer my persistent request to define the meaning of the word “Threshold” and how
the evidence did not meet it but they have refused to respond as did the OPP Anti-Racquets who
persistently refuse to investigate.

All the evidence has been provided to a preponderance of prominent government personnel whose e-mail
addresses can be found in the AAAAAALIST document on the CDF Documents web site but they have all
refused to cooperate and none would address the “Threshold” issue.

I highly suspect this has something to do with money and the Two Tier System that exists and they deny.

Sergeant Randy Craig of the OPP Anti-Rackets informed me on November 14 2006 they do not deal with
paltry sums like the over $100,000 that was scammed from me and went on to describe the case he was
working on involving an elderly couple who had been taken for their life savings and I looked at mom who
was 84 at the time and me 64 and said “I was taken for my life savings too and even more, that I had
borrowed.”

Nothing I said raised any interest from him and this is all detailed in Lawyer File # 8.

There are lots to read all irrefutably proving the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy.

I also have a prodigious amount of evidence not published for there is more than sufficient published to
commence an investigation and begin a PUBLIC INQUIRY where the people will find out the truth about
the people they believe are representing them.

235
A history professor of the University of British Columbia published a book making reference to a book by
Edmund Morgan who asserts the success of any government is dependent on their ability to deceive the
people and in a democracy it is necessary to have the people believe they have a voice and their
representatives are the people for the people.

http://books.google.com/books?id=eRHTr2TCBMwC&pg=PA19&dq=roles+and+responsibilities+of+the+
attorney+general+canada&sig=hi6yCnnxTgLu6Qjx9yJS2U80xG4#PPA19,M1

Make note they are talking about the success of any form of government of deception akin to any
syndicated organized crime and our concerns are for the success of the moral majority of the populace
where it is necessary to have a government to take care of the day to day needs of a moral society and the
government personnel work for the benefit of the people.

This should be done as effectively and efficiently as possible and would be if the government personnel
understood the concept and were competent responsible irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to
that endeavour, prerequisite to meet the terms of the guarantee of the Charter to every individual.

That means priority one is to address the predictable for prevention where punishment attentive to
deterrence is the only viable option.

Instead they have made it into a legal professions paradise addressing the symptoms and milking society
for all it’s worth and by refusing to support the guarantee with a diligent modus operandi, efficient and
effective the affluent are given a humongous advantage over the individual’s who often can not afford to
access the services of the courts and the entire illegal system which is irrefutably proven by the
documentation and my 3 year struggle so far to get the justice as guaranteed by the Charter.

Big corporations weigh things in terms of money and the likelihood of being caught, having many lawyers
on staff to advise them and the entire legal system obviously on their side where the powers that be of

236
State and Church have always had an insatiable greed for power and wealth and the affluent and influential
have always been there to help them and vice versa.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/jan1999/civ-j21.shtml

237
Although this is a problem that occurred in the US it invariably happens world wide due the attitude of the
governments and the wealthy conglomerates and in this particular case the government refused to help as
they like to make these civil matters giving the humongous advantage to the conglomerates and not a hope
in hell for the individual.

The cases are extremely expensive and in fact Jan Schlichtmann and associates went bankrupt arguing the
point even though he had presented enough evidence to get the EPA involved and shortly after he settled
under pressure due the legal system working against him the EPA settled with the companies for around
$70 million to clean up the contaminated site but there was no mention if the people who were seriously
affected with cancer got any benefit out of this and obviously the EPA waited until Jan went bankrupt
before settling.
I doubt he received any benefit either although he was proven right in his charges against the company and
if not for the attention he drew to the situation and the reasonable evidence he had provided the EPA would
never had investigated and the people would have been left to die of the cancer without ever proving the
pathetic excuse for people running the companies weighing things in dollars and cents indifferent to the
safety and well being of the people.

238
The legal system sided with the money against the people being obvious not only to a tiered system but
irrefutably proves justice is not their intention or is it achievable where the well being of the people is not a
concern with money taking center stage with these people of the Upper Tier where they scratch each others
back for wealth and power.

Such situations clearly show the government personnel and legal profession often one and the same are in
the business only for money and do not give a damn about the individuals of the Lower Tier.
Justice is only what they purport to serve but invariably they are there to serve themselves.

The 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document references a personal incident I had involving a
contract to build a dock and a deck amongst many other things which a lawyer acting on behalf of the
nephew of my client terminated the contract for devious reasons detailed in the document citing I was to
commence the project on or about June 5 2006 and complete it on or about June 15 2006 and stated in the
termination letter of June 16 2006 that I had barely started the project and amongst other blatant lies his
client had decided to terminate the contract.

It was more than just coincidence that he did so the day after I had bought and had delivered the remaining
material to finish the job.

The fact is there was no starting or finishing date on the contract and it stated in the contract I would be
finished when the client was satisfied I had fulfilled my responsibilities as per the contract to her liking.

I wrote the lawyer and copied the Law Society of Upper Canada complaining of his conduct and they felt
according to their authority and the rules of conduct their member had done nothing wrong.

This is incomprehensible and irrefutable evidence the individual does not have a hope in hell of receiving a
resemblance to justice where ever their members are to be found and they have infested the entire legal
system of which the federal and Ontario Attorney Generals are members.

The Law Society responded blatantly admitting, either stated or implied their members are not required to
give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and their only obligation is to vigorously
advance the interest of their clients who are obviously the people who can avail them selves of their
services.

The Society goes on to state that their members are not required to validate their clients complaint by
looking at the contract and ensuring there indeed was a breach thus allowing them to trample over their
clients adversary’s Charter rights at will and then they state they are not required to look at the evidence I
offered in support of my complaint against their member before concluding he is innocent of the charges
and in compliance with their rules and standards.

So these people who hold every position of authority in the legal system who do not give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights have structured a system that does not give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights yet are the people who are demanded of the Charter to support the
guarantee to every individual.

Quite a conundrum and pathetically incomprehensible but is indicative of the modus operandi they have in
place where they who responded to the issues I addressed were incoherent to the evidence and even

239
refused to look at it yet they concluded on the issues in support of the government and ultimately in favour
of the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada.
When this evidence gets out to the people they are dead in the water but they have all avenues fixed where
even the media cooperate with them for many reasons and of course they are all of the Upper Tier.

The individual’s simply do not have a hope in hell with the present illegitimate system, which has been
deliberately designed for their benefit to ransack the people at will.

Notably they who do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and have refused to
structure the system and put a modus operandi in place able to prove due diligence to the support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights leave the people vulnerable to the immorally inclined which they
play the major role providing them a flourishing supply of victims and criminals which allows the legal
system and the members of the Society in the private sector to flourish as the legal system empire
continues to expand to the horrific detriment of the taxpayer and of course all people who believe they are
being protected by a legal system which has been deliberately designed not to protect them.

The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” clearly states he advises all government
departments and agencies and is responsible to ensure the administration of the law is done so consistent
with the Constitution and that all laws enacted are legal and consistent with the Constitution.

It states he is responsible for and is the Guardian of the Public Interest and the Guardian of the Rule of
Law.

I reiterate the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” presently published on his web site
makes no mention of the Charter; however he is responsible for all constitutional matters.

This infers the “Roles….. “were written before the 1982 enactment of the Constitution and demonstrates
the traditional unscrupulous ways of the legal profession prior to the enactment and since as the evidence
irrefutably proves.

The rule of law is defined as that most elusive concept-the rule of law- a well established legal principle,
hard to easily define which protects the individual and society as a whole.

This irrefutably proves it is conducive to long drawn out complicated debates particularly beneficial to the
luxurious life styles the members of the Society have come to know and completely incompetent to
support the individual’s Charter rights where their system is not designed to protect the people as
guaranteed but designed to cause and feast off the symptoms of their deliberate incompetence to protect
them.

One for the Money ….Two for the show system where they will proclaim they act on behalf of the people
in the name of justice but obviously don’t and have admitted in the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada
document.

They who do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights are the first to proclaim
these rights for the criminal element illegitimately and not in the spirit of the law I might add as they
obstruct in every way possible the right of the people to find the truth quickly and efficiently with
punishment administered to deter such crimes which are predictable and obviously preventable before the
people become victimized.

240
A person caught in the act of a crime is advised of purported to be rights to seek council before speaking
and ultimately this gives them time to connive a story with the help of their lawyer who plans a course of
action in the best interest of his client for money where justice is not the slightest in their minds as
demonstrated in the 2 Part Law Society document.

If the person was allowed to speak when caught the truth would most likely be reached quickly and
efficiently conducive to everyone concerned in the spirit of the law except for the members of the Law
Society who are obviously not of the spirit.

The result is long drawn out cases of futility financed by the taxpayers where justice is seriously
compromised not conducive to purpose whereas it is due to the criminal element in the first place the
people were required to finance the entire system to efficiently and effectively eradicate immoral
inclination and thus diligently support their guaranteed Charter rights.

The members of the Law Society have turned the system into adverse purpose where justice is improbable
and money is the name of the game, which can easily be proven by looking at their houses, cars and bank
accounts and the same for the people who finance this pathetic excuse for a justice system.

The criminal element is guaranteed a lawyer financed by the taxpayer and the criminal element exists
because of the deliberate incompetence and unwillingness of the legal system to deter it.

When reasonable evidence is presented to the police against an individual they should be allowed to search
the individual’s property if the evidence warrants it and the individual who is presumed innocent should
meet the requirements of the presumption being cooperative and in compliance with the law and should be
pleased to have the opportunity to prove their innocence willingly allowing the search.

If evidence of another crime surfaces during the search likewise they should be able to follow the trail to
wherever or whatever it leads and should be allowed to be presented against them in court.

After all they are responsible to comply with the law and presumed to be in compliance with the law until
reasonable evidence surfaces. A person unwilling to cooperate presents a significant strain on the system
conducive to the benefit of themselves and others of the immoral element, which most certainly includes
the members of the Law Societies.

When you consider the unscrupulous ways of these members and their above average intelligence, in
particular in matters of law which they practice, having a humongous advantage over the people of the
Lower Tier who have careers in other fields of endeavour knowing very well attentiveness to their careers
as competent responsible irreproachable people with fortitude and conviction is mandatory, with many
checks and balances keeping them in line it is certain with nothing keeping the Law Society members in
line they will definitely stray.

It is quite obvious these people who do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
have been attentive to creating a system conducive to their well being and supporting them against the
justice of the people and therefore require a warrant before the police can initiate a search inevitably
stopping them from fishing expeditions which they could initiate against them looking into their financial
portfolios connecting them to the obvious corruption that runs rampant.

They will forever proclaim they act on behalf of the people but how naïve does one have to be to believe
these proven to be charlatans who do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and

241
consistently prove it in everything they do because it is their nature acquiesced over time as tradition and
habit since well before Confucius 2500 years ago revealed their BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS
and MORALITY ploy.

The federal Accountability Act, 2006 is an excellent example of this, when under pressure by the people
for the irresponsible government, which ultimately is the responsibility of the office of the DOJ,
Department of Justice under the authority of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
Canada appointed by the Prime Minister they enact the Accountability Act suggesting he was never
required to be responsible, being utter nonsense obviously proving irrefutably their unscrupulous intent.

Such actions inevitably provides inane jobs to their friends of the Law Society expanding their empire
unduly complicating the entire legal system with befuddlements of thought further adding credibility to
their actions where there is not a credible legitimate thought in their minds to the service of the people.

The Ombudsman (Lawyer File # 4), the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal (Lawyer File # 1) and the
Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services (Lawyer File # 10) are purportedly independent agencies
of the government but are obviously under control and advisement of the Attorney General who is at the
root of the evil perpetrated against me and ultimately the individuals of the Lower Tier adverse to their
guaranteed Charter rights which can not possibly be guaranteed and in fact precisely opposite
guaranteeing as predictable that they will be ravished by the immoral and in particular the members of the
Law Societies where the Society has put in writing and demonstrated they do not give a damn about our
rights but will invariably proclaim in public their purpose in life is to act on our behalf.

The evidence I have provided is most convincing and irrefutable of their unscrupulous attitude and their
deliberate ineptness to act in service of the people consistent with the Constitution conducive to the
support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, which requires competent responsible
irreproachable people of fortitude and conviction to the endeavour which the Prime Minister has admitted
by the enactment of the Accountability Act, 2006 and as the evidence irrefutably shows they are not.

The evidence is not debatable of their conspiracy against the people, having been persistently provided the
evidence and the opportunity to act on behalf of the people and the preservation of the sanctity of the
Constitution consistent with and conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

The evidence irrefutably proves there is no option available to the people to act on their behalf, in the
entire legal system, which is obviously due to the irresponsible federal and provincial Attorney Generals
who are responsible to ensure the entire legal system operates on their own behalf.

A PUBLIC INUIRY is warranted that will ultimately result in the restructuring of the legal system
consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

The evidence shows such an inquiry will not be initiated by the present government personnel who will
take every initiative to cover up the issues and prevent such an occurrence assured to end their persistent
conspiracy perpetrated against the very people they were financed and trusted to protect.

The people of the Lower Tier need your help and once again I provide the opportunity to every person
whose e-mail addresses are listed in the AAAAAAALIST document to do so and failure to act on their
behalf given the irrefutable evidence will be conclusive evidence of the major role you play in the
conspiracy having the wherewithal and the responsibility to do so.

242
Meanwhile due the evidence it is a reasonable presumption they will all remain steadfast to the conspiracy
and we the people who would like to believe we are in control of the government must take on initiatives
to make it true and believable.

Never has there been such an opportunity to make it believable and so easily done by simply becoming a
member of the Charter Democracy Force by clicking on
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force/members_invite

When this form appears enter your e-mail address here and
click on “Add members directly” immediately above.

This will eventually provide the support we need to initiate the change we of the moral majority
desperately need, not only for our protection as guaranteed by the Charter but our financial wellbeing that
will substantially advance while eliminating poverty and further persecutions persistently perpetrated by
the traditionally unscrupulous members of the Law Societies who have woven a tangled web founded on
deceit.

Most rewarding is we people will have our revenge as their life styles dwindle to the pathetic ones we led
under their regime.

By registering you will play a major role in the annals of history being the beginning of the end of the
inherent struggle of humankind as we set out for the betterment of all humankind in preservation of the
planet we all need to survive.

We must all accept our responsibility and do our part, which is so little for so much.

Please use the pyramid scheme, which is legitimate to purpose to quickly spread the word we have the
irrefutable evidence against the blight on society and intend to use it in the spirit of the Constitution
conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights ensuring due punishment is applied in deterrence
of predictable crimes which will ensure no reoccurrence of such atrocities are perpetrated again by the
despicable people who pretend to be on our side to gain the authority to ransack us blind.

243
We of Charter Democracy Force will have our way to the detriment of the traditional unscrupulous
arrogant members of the Law Societies.

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
In Us We Trust

244
May 13, 2008 Addendum to Charter Democracy Force May 9 2008
To: AAAAALIST
Conflict of Interest
Particular attention
of the bald, two faced liar
Mary Dawson Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Commissioner Ethics and
Conflict of Interest

Louis Theoret
Federal Ombudsman
Victims of Crime

Bob MacAdam
RCMP Staff Sergeant

Sgt. Randy Craig


OPP Anti-Rackets

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet is precisely due to perception
The Constitution Act, 1982: Document
Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:

The issues addressed and proven irrefutably to be fact on the Charter Democracy Force web site are
predictable consistent with the well documented truth read between the lines of the documented
volumes of history since well before the days of Confucius 2500 years ago who stated:

“There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS, and MORALITY… finally I began to make out what was written
between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE.

As we know of reality there are 6.6 billion people of unique perception similarly born to earth with empty
minds where environment of rearing, customs, cultures, traditions and religious beliefs of parents and
guardians play major roles as does formal education, experience and adeptness to thought and reason.

We are all similar in nature requiring the same necessities to sustain life, vulnerable to harm and receptive
to kindness with common interest for our own individual safety and wellbeing.

We understand the concept of cause and effect and action begets reaction and should one harm another it
would be reciprocated in kind, and if not nipped in the bud will lead to humongous detriments

We know Law and Order is fundamental to peace and harmony among all humankind and in Canada the
supreme law, the Constitution recognizes the supremacy of God and the rule of law

245
We know of Jesus, word renown and the aspirations attributed to God are best known and stated by Jesus

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”


We know these words are derivatives of the wisdom of Confucius who stated 500 years prior
“What you do not want done to yourself do not do to others”

We know if we do not all aspire to the same ideology the moral majority will be taken advantage of and
hence the need for effective efficient enforcement to assure every individual complies and abides by the
spirit intended where common sense must prevail and “The Spirit” must be conducive to the safety and
wellbeing of every individual equally if peace and harmony is to be willingly maintained.

“The Spirit” of the law must be easily understood, fair to every individual and consistently appear to be
fair, founded on fundamentals inherent to the nature of humankind.

Hence enforcement must be consistently fair of appropriate punishment with priority one to deterrence
addressing the predictable attentive to prevention nipping immoral inclination in the bud, which left
unattended is certain to rampantly flourish out of control wreaking havoc upon the moral society intended
of the aspirations attributed to God.

Confucius made this unambiguously clear with these words of wisdom:


“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”
Perhaps 2500 years ago these words were difficult to comprehend but any sane person today receptive to
thought and reason would be coherent to the need for every individual to adhere to the concept where we
are all individuals similar in nature having no excuse not to comprehend and respect the God given rights
of every individual.

Every individual must be presumed to understand the need to cooperate and comply with “The spirit” of
the law and with the presumption is the responsibility of every individual to comply and cooperate with the
enforcement fundamental to the concept.

Prerequisite to the Constitution: Document is competent responsible irreproachable government personnel


of fortitude and conviction to the administration and enforcement of the law conducive to the protection
and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter and it is the responsibility of the Minister
of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the provincial Attorney Generals to support the Charter
guarantee as clearly stated in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” which a copy was
downloaded and copied to Lawyer File # 7.

The spirit of the Constitution is clear and is the authority which authorizes the Attorney Generals to
administer and enforce the law consistent with the Constitution which granted them their authority and as
advisors of the heads of government departments and agencies it is their responsibility to ensure the
government personnel are advised consistent with the Constitution and the entire legal system is operated
in continuity of competent responsible irreproachable government personnel of fortitude and conviction to
the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights fundamental to the spirit of the
ideology.

246
The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada Lawyers Rules of Conduct.

(103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit
as well as in the letter.

That makes sense to me and should to anyone receptive to thought and reason where sanity and common sense
prevails and the following extracted from the Charter is consistent with “The Spirit’

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.
32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within
the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories;
and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of
the legislature of each province.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

These words confirm the presumption every individual is indeed equal in all matters of the law and of
course every individual is responsible for their own actions to be in compliance with “The Spirit” of the
law, “The Spirit” of the aspirations attributed to God and “The Spirit” of the people intent on a moral
peaceful society, all being one and the same in and of “The Spirit”

This is guaranteed by the Constitution: Document which everyone knows will not be obeyed unless
enforced consistent with the authority and nobody has authority above and beyond “The Spirit” and the
nucleus and source of the strength of “The Spirit” is wholly dependent on the government personnel who
administer and enforce “The Spirit” where it is ultimately the responsibility of the Minister of Justice and
the Attorney General of Canada who must be competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and
conviction ensuring the entire legal system is operated in continuity of “The Spirit” with competent
responsible and irreproachable government personnel with fortitude and conviction to administer and
enforce the law in and of “The Spirit”

This is fundamental to “The Spirit” yet for near 3 years I have been providing the evidence to the
prominent government personnel whose e-mail addresses are provided in the AAAAALIST document on
the Charter Democracy Force web site and proliferated them with Dick and Jane commentary hoping they
would Spot the absence of “The Spirit” in the government modus operandi and the refusal of the
government personnel to address the issues in “The Spirit” obviously indicating they are devoid of “The
Spirit” fundamental to the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy against the moral
majority indicative of the spirit of the Law Society of Upper Canada who are of the belief their members
are not required to be of “The Spirit” who adamantly proclaim, either stated or implied they are not
required to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

So, the Constitution: Document and the Charter guarantee are criminally fraudulent documents without
a diligent attempt to support attentive to punishment, the only viable option, priority one to deterrence
addressing the predictable in pursuance of the protection of every individual in all matters before and
under the law, convincingly proving the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the
Ontario Attorney General are incompetent irresponsible and reproachable.

The evidence irrefutably proves they never intended to support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
and yet have accepted financial gain from the taxpayer on the belief they would structure a legal system
adept to administer and enforce the laws consistent with the Constitution which granted them their
247
authority and incumbent on them no matter their intentions which should be in and of “The Spirit” but
obviously not as the evidence attests.

Fundamental to logic and common sense is why would they go to so much effort to deceive and defraud
the people when they would collect their financial benefits by just performing their duties legitimately
consistent with the Constitution: Document and given the opportunities available to them in these
extraordinary positions of power and trust with no legitimate government department or agency with
authority to keep them in check it is overwhelming evidence beyond any reasonable doubt warranting an
investigation of their personnel financial portfolios compared with government matters they have had
extraordinary influence providing them extraordinary opportunity to illegitimately benefit from in many
arenas including the stock market. This would not be fishing yet would obviously be objected to by the
guilty.

When decisions based on personal financial gain are made contrary to the well being of society as a whole
we have a humongously extraordinary problem and no matter which way you want to address the evidence
it is indicative the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the Ontario Attorney General
are guilty of Conflict of Interest and I will forward this to the Commissioner of Conflict of Interest and
Ethics Mary Elizabeth Dawson requesting she commence or cause to commence proceedings addressing
this most serious matter which she has already been provided the evidence.

A PUBLIC INQUIRY at the very least is warranted and her efforts to these issues will be conclusive of the
vital role she has played allowing for the success of the democratic government as asserted by Edmund
Morgan founded on deception where it is necessary to have the people believe they have a voice and their
representatives are the people for the people.

She will also irrefutably prove the superfluity of the federal Accountability Act, 2006 which was enacted
by the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada in an attempt to cover
up the irresponsible modus operandi of the legal system which the minister is responsible for, non
conducive to the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which the Law Society of Upper
Canada does not require their members to give a damn about.

The Prime Minister appoints the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and is in on the
conspiracy over his head as his office responded July 20 2007 stating they are sure I understand why the
PM can not get involved. (See page 30 of the “Government Correspondence compiled September 1 2007”
document published on the CDF documents web site)

Of course I understand the PM not wanting to get involved in the matter of his part of the conspiracy.

I can also understand why none of them want to get involved for the same reason.

It is simply too obvious that if any of them were competent responsible irreproachable with fortitude and
conviction to the wellbeing of the people of the Lower Tier consistent with the Constitution conducive to
the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights they would have acted appropriately in “The Spirit’ and saw to
it the issues were dealt with ensuring their modus operandi was effective and efficient to legitimate
purpose but ultimately they proved quite convincingly they do not give a damn consistent with the
performance demonstrated by the Law Society in the 2 Part document.

The following document can be found on page 23 of the aforementioned file published on the CDF
Documents web site.

248
May 10 2008
I have reiterated upon reiteration the issues are
not of a personal matter and began with my
complaint against the ORHT for not performing
their duty under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997
and for non compliance with the Constitution Act in support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights regarding the criminal act of
fraud over $100,000 committed right in front of the judicator and recorded by her in a public building financed by the people
to administer and enforce justice consistent with the Constitution in support of our guaranteed right of protection where
punishment due the crime is fundamental to our protection where punishment is the only deterrence. The criminal was
caught cold turkey and they have provided the ultimate proof they are not in the business to protect the people as guaranteed
It is obviously the furthest thing from their mind. It is not my responsibility
to see that the government personnel are competent and responsible to
purpose and I exhausted the options available to me where it is ultimately
the responsibility of the Ontario Attorney General to see that Ontario
government departments and agencies are operating conducive to the public
interest, which he is purportedly the Guardian. That puts the responsibility
It is the federal
on the federal government to see that he complies with the Constitution Act
government that in support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
enacted the
Constitution
and it must be
their
responsibility to
see that the
provincial
governments
administer them
in support of the This is not a personal issue but proof of that which I know first hand.
guarantee.

Ultimately the
federal
government
made the
guarantee and it
is their
responsibility to If they were competent responsible irreproachable people
support it. with fortitude and conviction to the support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights they would have
been aghast at what the evidence irrefutably proves and
took the appropriate actions to get the Ontario Legal system
in order.

The manner in which the entire government personnel on


both the federal and provincial level addressed the issues is
incomprehensible and indicative of the government
conspiracy as the evidence irrefutably proves.

All the evidence consistently proves their modus operandi


is adverse to the support of the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights and their indifference to the evidence proves
beyond any possible doubt they do not give a damn about249
the people’s Charter rights, never did or ever intended to.
When it comes to sane reasoning for sane efficient effective legitimate purpose the governments are not
adept or familiar with the concept and the so called investigative authorities have gained their experience
by observing the crooks in action presuming they are learning the law.

These people are professional charlatans obvious of their modus operandi adverse to “The Spirit” of the
law, “The Spirit” of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, “The Spirit” of the people being
persecuted into hopelessness and despair and “The Spirit” of the aspirations attributed to God to satisfy
their own personal interests to satiate their traditional avarice cravings not giving a damn about the people
of the Lower Tier other than controlling them as cheap labour to do the work of their affluent and
influential friends who scratch each other backs vigorously advancing their interests of wealth and power.

The evidence irrefutably shows precisely as I allege and the RCMP Commissioner’s Letter of Final
Disposition due on or about May 21 2008 will invariably prove why their organized crime of corruption
and conspiracy against the individual’s of the Lower Tier has been persistently successful based on
deception, out and out lies with their modus operandi being consistent with that as Edmund Morgan
asserted not only adverse to the Constitution but the definition of Democracy itself which they purport to
administer and enforce.

Democracy
Social equality, equality, egalitarianism

Egalitarianism
Parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality

Democracy is consistent with “The Spirit” of the law, “The Spirit” of the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights, “The Spirit” of the people being persecuted into hopelessness and despair and “The
Spirit” of the aspirations attributed to God.

The 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada provides the irrefutable evidence of the “Mightier than thou and
the law and don’t give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights” attitude and arrogantly
blatantly admitted it in writing knowing full well evidence is irrelative to them and their members who
hold the positions of authority throughout the entire legal system and would be ignored if it should ever be
presented to any of their members.

I hold that to be true because I have presented the evidence to a prodigious number of their members as per
the AAAAALIST document which includes the Bar Associations across Canada and the Federal Law
Society amongst many who purportedly play vital roles in the justice system where justice is not available
or accessible to the people of the Lower Tier for obvious reasons as the exhaustive near 3 year search for
one competent responsible irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction to the protection and
wellbeing of the people of the Lower Tier consistent with the Constitution conducive to their individual
Charter rights proved non existent and hence the Charter is a fraudulent document of no value to the
individual’s of the Lower Tier with the government personnel of the legal system ripping them off for
salaries and benefits where we would be much better off if they just took the money and stayed home
because when they are on the job they are looking for every opportunity to avail themselves of all their
positions offer, manipulating the stock market, taking insurance companies for all they are worth, taking a
great portion of that which the victims are entitled to, instigating long drawn out court cases financed by
the people with the insurance companies passing on their losses to the consumers as do all the industries

250
and the consumers pick up the tab. The more tax money they waste invariably inflates the cost of all
consumer products.

The big corporations and conglomerates are left uncontrolled; the oil companies ransack us as do they all with their
incompetent irresponsible reproachable attitude with fortitude and conviction to their own wellbeing indifferent to
the purpose the people believe they finance them. This goes on world wide causing all the struggles of humankind as
we prepare for the floods and the wars certain as we fight for food, water to drink and air to breathe due their
decisions based on what was in it for them.

Anyone of you people on the AAAAALIST has the opportunity to make things right but you would rather remain
loyal to they who do incalculable harm in their positions of trust with every opportunity to do some good for the
populace of the world but spit on them in pursuance of the wealth and power they so greedily pursue.

I personally do not believe there is a God or a promise of life in the hereafter but I sure hope so as they will take
their well earned place in the bottom tier.

Mary Elizabeth Dawson


Commissioner of Ethics and
Conflict of Interest.

I have provided you a prodigious amount of irrefutable evidence regarding the unethical and illegitimate modus
operandi of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada conducive to his fellow members of the Law
Society of Upper Canada, inconsistent with “The Spirit” of the Constitution and the protection and wellbeing of the
individual’s of the Lower Tier who he has not only refused to support the Charter guarantee enacted by the federal
government but continues to operate in a manner conducive to the immoral element of society providing an
abundant supply of victims and criminals for his fellow members to luxuriously thrive to the humongous detriment
of the people of the Lower Tier and the taxpayers.

There can be no doubt this is in CONFLICT OF INTEREST of the sanctity of the Constitution and the people who
believe he is there for them as is his responsibility to advise the government departments and agencies in
performance of their duties which is ultimately for the protection and benefit of every individual equally.

You have the irrefutable evidence and a PUBLIC INQUIRY is the only viable option.

I request you attend to this matter in the service of the people and for the sanctity of the Constitution

Louis Theoret
Executive Director
Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime

You have been provided the identical evidence and surely priority is to the prevention of victims and due the modus
operandi of the government the people of the Lower Tier are being victimized as you read being predictable with the
Minister of Justice refusing to support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of protection and equal benefit in
all matters before and under the law.

You undoubtedly have a moral and ethical responsibility along with a legal responsibility having been informed and
well aware of the serious nature of the issues involving government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy
against the people of the Lower Tier being perpetrated by the DOJ headed by the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada with the cooperation of the Prime Minister who appointed him.

No doubt it is above your authority as it is with every one of you where it is hardly likely the conspirators would
provide any of you specific authority to expunge them, however you all have the authority of the Constitution:
Document which he has no authority to do what he and others before him have done.

251
A PUBLIC INQUIRY is warranted and you have the responsibility to see that happens and I request you do so.

Frank Gallagher
2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document

The Key to Coherence

One of the key problems, perhaps the major one that has allowed the government organized crime of
corruption and conspiracy to exist is inherent to human nature and reality.

For example if there was a large bowl of coins of nickels, dimes, quarters, loonies and toonies totaling
$500 and 10 people were going to have an opportunity to put both their fists into the bowl in consecutive
order one turn each until all the coins have been taken the first person would invariably end up with the
least number of coins and the biggest portion of the loot and adversely the last person would end up with
the largest number of coins and by far the short end of the stick money wise.

A few would say it’s fair but the majority would definitely not. If this was just one random deal it would
not be worth mentioning but when it is a constant it would be very frustrating.

Obviously the first two or three into the bowl would scoop for the largest coins which would certainly thin
out by the time the last person reached into the bowl and would have to work a whole lot harder trying to
find some bigger coin, with the pressures greater trying to hang on to them amidst all the nickel and dimes.

If this was a constant thing in fact perhaps the method of doling out a weeks pay the last person would
soon be completely out of the game because at first they would have enough to get by and most likely be
happy they have their hands in the jar but eventually the people at the top working their way down will
drive the economy up wth everyone trying to get as much as they can, being the natural thing to do which
will eventually see the person at the bottom falling below the poverty line steadily going deeper in debt
working the hardest, and not able to experience any of the better things in life or even a night out at the
show.

The person will get a second job but income taxes will go up debts accumulate driven into hopelessness
and despair with the next 6 or 7 people above on the same sliding scale downwards and the top two or
three vigorously advancing having everything going for them.

Being successful with far greater share of the coin and influential power being able to buy just about
anything including friends and love at least seemingly so.

The rest just keep struggling so as to pre-empt their eventuality with government personnel resting
comfortably in their secure place with everyone contributing to their pension funds who can not afford
pensions for themselves.

A study of salary differences was published on TV a few months back between the public services and
private sector with an alarming difference, which I was well aware of having worked in both
environments.

I only saw it on TV once even though I scanned the news for the next couple of days.

252
The government stepped in and dealt with problem by cutting it off the air giving credence to the adage
“Ignorance is bliss”

So back to the bowl of money and the old adage “You can’t get blood from a stone” with the government
having already tapped into the bottom 7’s money supply as best they could without advancing the pull of
gravity attentive to keep the people healthy and working necessary for their money grab to do whatever it
is interests them their attention turns or remains with the top two or 3 who have certain affluent influential
power who the politicians cater to ogling the money like a shy kid just noticing the opposite sex and of
course they get to know each other and the first thing you know they are making out but it is we of the
lower 7 who are getting screwed.

They woo each other compromising this for that which we of course pick up the tab.

Boy we would sure like to help you but our taxes are too high but I have great investment opportunities if
you would allow some right offs and if you could do that I’ll count you in.
Not too easy I’ll have to talk to Peter and Jack and they will have to talk to…don’t worry about it, there is
enough for us all.

So the people of the bottom 7 get their taxes raised to offset the write offs and their deceleration increases
with more and more at the bottom needing help.
They at the top need more breaks to get the economy rolling and the bottom need more help, so we will
increase the taxes of the middle class lower those of the top and bottom and we’ll run along like that for
awhile.

Their wealthy friends in the oil, banks and other conglomerates need more help and why not they are
heavily invested in and they provide good tax flow and so on like that with everyone acquiescing to
circumstance being quite used to it as being just “How it is”

The legal system of course is outrageously empathetic to where the money is and who gives a damn where
it isn’t.

When we look back at the money bowl we can see it is obviously not fair, only the bottom 5 maybe 6 are
complaining with the top 3, 4 and 5 reasonably comfortable waiting for their opportunity at the top.

Things should be fair they scream from the bottom but who cares, they got no money, what are they going
to do. While you are down there, you could shine my shoes.

But things look pretty okay from near the top and although they would be heard why would they and lose
the cream of the crop.

They at the bottom and those ultimately heading there seeing no viable future playing this game head into
other more promising careers and should they get caught will have free room and board and pick up a few
tricks of the trade.

Lawyers see great profit in this cycle with the taxpayer picking up the tab as they, the legal system and the
criminal element flourish the bottom 7 descend more rapidly as the need for more subsidized housing and
more legal people, police and buildings increase with the need for more taxes picked up by the middle
class.

253
The upper 2 or 3 have their problems too with interest rates increasing as does their returns on investments
and profits increasing and their taxes going sky high the government will take care of that for
considerations and middle class will continue to pick up the tab until they fall through the cracks.

No problem, it’s just a cycle that will eventually be solved with war and on and on we go into dawns early
light without thought and reason doing it all by rote, a habitual thing.
The powers that be of State and Church have traditionally and unscrupulously been partial to wealth and
power with religions and governments founded on myths, lies and deception.

“There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the
words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS, and MORALITY… finally I began to make out what was
written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE.

That’s how it has always been and the reason for “How it is”

The powers that be of the legal system in Canada have the wherewithal to make the change to “How it
should be” in accordance with the Constitution conducive to the Charter but being at the top along with the
people of the Upper Tier see no reason to change as the Lower Tier people do but so what, who do they
think they are with no money and how can we possibly help them without giving up some of ours.

Okay already, we get the picture.


We do get the picture right?

The way of life has acquiesced over centuries passed on from generation after generation with the people
at the top of the bowl passing it on to their descendants explaining the facts of life and the people at the
bottom also explained with two humongously different stories but invariably both cost society
tremendously in so many ways with people at the top persistently driving the people to the bottom and into
the ground with the aid of the powers that be of State and Church who know where the money is.

The Church keeps the moral majority in line spiritually with myths and lies making them receptive to the
lies of State allowing them to ransack the people in tranquil state not knowing what to believe amongst the
befuddlement of lies.

The religious sects will argue logic and region with the proof it says so right here in the bible and the
police will argue they are just doing their job according to law, which they know nothing about having
learned with hand me down information originating from the top.

They commence their careers being told common sense has nothing to do with the law, which should be
their first clue but what are you going to do, it is just “How it is” when you live in a shoe.

They gain experience as to what is acceptable for a successful prosecution from observation to determine
the law rather than knowing the law and determining who is obeying it and who is not.

It is the absurdities of reality, which makes it near impossible to reach the ideal.

It is said the law is an ass, but we know better, it is the people who administer and enforce the law that are
and as it is with the progression and thought it actually is the people who are asses for accepting “How it
is” and even paying the taxman to allow the immoral minority to have their way with the people of the

254
Lower Tier, the moral majority who willingly believe these charlatan’s, procreators of hopelessness and
despair ensuring ample supply of victims and perpetrators for the legal profession to thrive.

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception.


The thing about thinking is it can only accomplish at best that which the knowledge contained in one’s
mind is capable.

When one thinks and comes to an impasse due to lack of knowledge and ends that train of thought staying
with in the realm possessed, one’s perception will be decidedly limited in cooperation with “How it is” and
the ideal will remain for ever elusive with their friends of similar thought ensuring it.

Over the past few months with a firm grasp of reality and an abundance of experience of dealing with
people in the government services having spent 40 years in the same discipline, legal surveying in both
public and private sector know well of the incompetence of the majority of the public sector personnel, not
because they are dumb but because of management who can’t help but be incompetent having worked their
way through the ranks or brought in fresh from university without an iota of experience.
Having made every effort scrawled this way and that across every page the realities I have come to know
with the hopes of inducing serious thought and reason consistent with legitimate moral purpose adding
more knowledge for them to comprehend with the initiative to break them from the spell the powers that
be of State and Church have put them in.
I have predictably failed with idiotcracy firmly embedded.

Such an onerous and formidable challenge aware of the nature of humankind, the way they will be if left
uncontrolled and hence the reason for law and order, the traditional unscrupulous ways of the powers that
be of State and Church confirmed by just typing in religion on the web, crusades and Adam and Eve and a
few others that came to mind.

Politicians, who will do anything to be elected and then complain about their salaries and give themselves
raises.
Watch them in debates with the opposition demeaning the party in power and they reciprocate demeaning
them while they were in power.

That’s the truth people need to see and when they can not retort they divert to how well they are
performing in other sectors being professional prevaricators. FFF, Forthright Forthcoming and Forthwith
arrogantly expected of others which they have not the slightest concept.

It’s all there for people to see, even the media who intelligently play their game and know well of the value
in dollars and cents as their audience is drawn to the mystery where there is no mystery at all when you go
straight to the point.

Like the unknown of religious beliefs, the supernatural and life beyond which has a significant drawing
power and mystery where there is none for those not receptive to charlatans.

They have just always been and are a part of reality and cause reality based on fiction, myths and
deception working hand in hand with the politicians taking the people for a ride of impossible promises
with their hands deep into their pockets bringing us to this chaotic world which only they had the power to
prevent while proclaiming they are for the world of good.

255
Politicians and lawyers, most often one and the same who proclaim they could do better in the private
sector but fight tooth and nail for their elected positions.

I have often wondered why they do go into politics because history shows they have never been up to any
good as they proclaim but will often hail some to be heroes as they will bring a wounded soldier in front of
the people to praise him or her for ulterior purpose.

Whenever they say something that pleases the crowd you can bet they have something up their sleeve the
crowd will never know about as they continue in the circular path where the people are always on a
downward slope with their minds being put to ignorant bliss.

Lawyers who make the laws and then blame injustice on them are a particular peeve but I could go and on
and so could every one of you if you had a mind to.

It is to that endeavour I ask you all to give me your undivided attention to the 2 Part Law Society of
Upper Canada document published on the Charter Democracy Force and affiliate web site the
“CDF Documents”
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
http://groups.google.com/group/the-cdf-documents

The Key to Coherence

For those of you who believe they are sane and coherent to reality I provide you the opportunity to prove
it.

The key to unlock the mystery to the struggle of humankind, that the powers that be of State and Church
have persistently perpetrated persecuting their own people to satiate their avarice desires with the people
willingly accepting it financing their cause being an absurdity incomprehensible to they who are not
ignorantly blissed, being “How it is”

Due the nature of humankind, creatures of habit with the majority receptive to being led, the charlatans
happy to oblige being “How it is” and likely to continue if you do not take this opportunity to end the
pathetic inanity of superfluous waste of time and effort propagating poverty, starvation and thirst, and
masochistic venture I request you make every effort to the reality that is to be found in the 2 Part
document.

It can take up to 5 minutes for these 2 parts to open so patience please being a virtue and the cause well
worthwhile and informative.

I have made reference to this document over and over again requesting you all become coherent to the
truth which is ridiculously obvious as is the fact the majority of the people on the AAAAAALIST are
lawyers or work hand in hand with them trusting they are the utmost knowledgeable on law and feel
obliged to be in line with them.

In particular the police consult with the Attorney Generals, their agents the Crown Attorneys and the DOJ
but ultimately the police must make the charges.

256
Then the Attorney Generals make the decision as to whether or not to prosecute. Obviously fixed for the
Attorney General stacking the deck of ever being brought to justice.

The Attorney Generals also advise the heads of the government departments and agencies so in such case
as the issues I have brought forward against the Attorney Generals it is hardly likely they would prosecute
which would seriously compromise any perceptions that may flash in that direction leaving them only one
viable alternative to reason being that he is obviously the legal authority even if he is illegitimately not
which one could reason along with the thought that as long as everyone else is going to reason the same
way which invariably they will having been trained to think that way makes him the legitimate authority
until removed being the “Catch 22” that never gets resolved by the weak minded having no confidence in
themselves and all the undue confidence of playing by the illegitimate resolves.
Upon conclusion of this summary if you believe you have been competent, responsible and irreproachable
with fortitude and conviction to the sanctity of the Constitution, which grants your authority being
consistent with the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights you will be rudely awakened if
you are in fact receptive to being competent, responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction
to the sanctity of the Constitution, which grants your authority being consistent with the support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights

Presuming you are of those traits coherent to the fact sanity must prevail in respect of the Constitution and
the people who finance it in its entirety of the belief the purpose of the legal system financed by the moral
majority is to eradicate immoral inclination, efficiently and effectively ASAP being the only viable option
in support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where priority must be to punishment attentive
to deterrence in initiatives of prevention thus fulfilling the terms of the Charter protecting the people as
guaranteed before they become victims.

Victims are the symptoms of the incompetence of the legal system, which the members of the legal
profession luxuriously thrive on to the detriment of the individual’s intent of a moral society as implied by
the Constitution that recognizes the supremacy of God.

Why would we finance a system in the spirit of the devil when that is readily available without any effort?

What you will read in the 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document is very, very simple where the
obvious conclusion is the members of the Law Societies who hold every position in the legal system with
the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada at the head, either stated or implied are not
required to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights being particularly absurd
considering the Minister has a responsibility noted in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney
General” published on the Ontario web site which I have copied to Lawyer File # 7 to be the Guardian of
the Public Interest and is responsible to advise the heads of the entire government departments and
agencies so as to be conducive to the public interest which decidedly is their individual guaranteed Charter
rights of equality in protection and benefits in all matters of law consistent with the definition of
democracy not as the book by Edmund Morgan asserts referenced by the History Professor Jonathan
Swainger of the University of British Columbia.

I request you speed readers and those of you too slow to read reflect on the significance of that which the
Law Society adamantly stated or implied that their members are not required to give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights being pathetically absurd adverse to the sanctity of “The Spirit” of
the Constitution and that which the moral majority believe they are paying for being the sane purpose of
law.

257
I had filed a complaint with the Law Society because one of their members illegitimately terminated a
contract I had to build a dock and deck and other projects for a nice little 93 old lady with a walker who
her nephew was looking after for obvious presumed purpose.

The work was approximately ¾ done although looked like a construction site not particularly pleasing for
any owner in such circumstance and I had just had the remaining material delivered to the site when the
nephew went to his lawyer to terminate the contract with lies.

He had relatives from out west who were coming to do some work around the place and a 3 foot high 20
foot long stone retaining wall was falling toward the waterfront, that they were going to work on.

I suggested during the original contract project that while I had the machine it would be far easier for me to
dig around and straighten the wall which would have taken them a long time by shovel which he agreed
and I did it for $300 at great loss to me but I was satisfied I had been paid enough in the original contract
and I wanted to see the whole project done right.

Forgive the long preamble but as always throughout my writings the intent is to get you into the true spirit
with the precise truth to reason and think with which I have not yet achieved any favourable results.

I have made the facts particularly clear and have provided them to you all on the AAAAALIST, which I
have not yet determined for certain whether you are deliberately in on the conspiracy, naively cooperating
with the conspiracy or are just plain stupid, none of which is conducive to the sanctity of the Charter or the
individual’s Charter rights.

Notably I am not a candidate for a public relations position and I am not looking for a personal favour as I
am just attempting to mess with your brains unscrambling them for useful legitimate moral purpose.

I make note that I understand how your minds got so befuddled common to nature, which never inflicted
me being abnormally sane in respect with “The Spirit” being eccentric of normal human behaviour which
history attests.

So let’s take a moment out for sanity and ponder harder on the fact the members of the Law Society of
Upper Canada who administer and enforce the Constitution are not required to give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights adverse to priority one to every individual who finance the entire
purported to be legal system.

“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”

This is obvious yet considered words of wisdom but assuredly you agree they are sound words for
everyone else to abide by even if you see yourself deserving of more privilege.

258
So back to the 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document where they are of the belief in accordance
with their authority and standards and regulations their members are not required to validate their clients
charges against another individual whereas the lawyer terminated the contract claiming I was in breach of
it by not completing the project in a time stipulated and in fact was nowhere near done and then goes on to
state more fabrications provided him by his client.

There is a certain amount of trust assumed on the validity of the word of the client but I consistently
requested a copy of this contract he was citing I was in breach of but the lawyer refused to oblige.
That wasn’t an unusual or unreasonable request and surely not difficult and after all when I wrote that the
contract was not with the nephew but his sweet little old auntie he mailed me a multi page power of
attorney with auntie providing the nephew authority to act on her behalf.

That simple reasonable issue was simply addressed as one would expect clearing up the truth of the
pertinent facts.

But what about the contract, most pertinent to a situation where I was terminated for reason of purportedly
breaching the contract?

He already proved he is capable and not averse to sending me relative documentation so why not the
contract which was most pertinent?
.
Do you see what I mean?

Perhaps it would be most helpful if you saw the contract, Right?

Is that not the point?


It is all about the contract, which he refuses to send me and the obvious question is why and the answer is
in the contract that he refuses to send me.

WHY?

Very simple because there is no such contract yet I did have a contract with auntie and I accept the fact the
nephew has authority to act on behalf of auntie regarding a contract I have with her with no starting or
completion date and in fact clearly states that I would be completed when auntie was satisfied I had
completed the terms of the contract to her satisfaction.

I repeatedly requested the Law Society of Upper Canada for a copy of the contract he purported to have
and they would not cooperate.

The issue was simple to address placing the contract side by side with the lawyer’s letter of termination
where the contract was my authority to do the project and his right to terminate it was a simple matter if I
was in breach of the terms of the contract.

It is all too simple to the average individual not employed in the illegitimate legal system who is just
looking for what is right.

259
Given the avails of cyber space fax and e-mails common to most offices in a matter of minutes in preferred
circumstance the contract could have been in the hands of the Law Society and seen that the contract was
illegitimately terminated and as for all the other absurd fabrications with the nephew proven to be a liar it
would then be a simple matter of finding a lawyer and taking the nephew to court to a legitimate justifiable
resolve.

However, having been involved with the other matter initiated at the ORHT a year earlier one would have
serious doubt as to receiving justice in the present purported to be legal sytem.

I know it was not realistic that they could have resolved the issue in a matter of a couple of minutes and the
response from the law Society on receiving my complaint noted they understood the urgency but it
normally takes 30 days for them to give my complaint the respect it deserves.
However, 2 months in lieu of 2 minutes is ridiculously absurd, and perhaps it would have been longer if
not for my letters nudging them along.

I am presuming you see the significance of the contract in this matter and understand beyond any doubt
why the lawyer refused to send a copy and why the Law Society took so long while aware of the urgency
stating they did not look at the contract and saw no reason to do.

I know it does not prove anything to the police who have learned early in their career that the law has
nothing to do with common sense and having been trained well enough to take positions of authority in the
higher ranks proves they are particularly receptive to the concept.

Out here in the real world we use common sense from the moment we begin to stir in bed where soon
thought comes to mind what time it is attentive to being at work on time or what ever is relevant.

We know to be careful not to fall out of bed as we just might hurt ourselves.

We do it all with common sense but then there is the matter of keeping out of trouble with the law being
somewhat of a befuddlement and surely a premeditated trap to take advantage of the people who believe
common sense will see them through.

I am going to use common sense right now and tentatively presume you all understand, which I know due
to circumstance the public will most assuredly having not been trained in matters of law consistent with
that which the DOJ and Attorney Generals make every effort to have the people understand and they
stubbornly refuse not being of immoral persuasion with moral persuasion intact.

“The people may be made to follow a course of action, but they may not be made to understand”

After all they are not being paid to give up their sanity, however the jury is still out as to their sanity, being
seriously compromised with the realities of the befuddlements of the powers that be of State and Church
who could sell fridges to Eskimos if they could be made to believe their life after death will be safely
secured.

That is how the popes got the people to join in on the crusades with promise if they died in battle fighting
to increase their wealth and power in the name of the Lord who aspired to peace

Common sense and rationale would do wonders for the world but the powers that be will not let the people
go.

260
So, the simple most obvious solution is for the people to do it themselves with simple common sense that
most are familiar with except in matters of law where the concept is to befuddle the people for the benefit
of the law makers.

Notably in the 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document evidence is irrelevant to them when it
concerns their members and the justice they dispense doesn’t make any sense being consistent with the law
the police have come to know and what concerns me is they are licensed to carry guns.

Like armies where their personnel haven’t a clue what they are fighting about, many just want to fight,
some want to be heroes, and others like the benefits offered but I doubt many are religious fanatics only
too pleased to die in battle for a God who doesn’t believe in it.

They get the privilege of the majority believing they are heroes but I remain true to fact as the nature of
humankind is to befuddle them selves, well documented in history.

That which common sense easily reveals in the 2 Part document is just as easily extrapolated to that which
is predictable of governments that are operated by the members of the Law Society.

Once you have the reality the document offers firmly in mind you should be able to see reality exactly as it
is being why the term “How it is” is often used by the police who do not have a clue of why it is “How it
is”

They have been trained and duped to provide a service adverse to the Constitution, the people and common
sense.

The Canadian people are at the mercy of the police and army and when the enemy, the powers that be of
State and Church tell them to point their guns on us assuredly they will fire on their own net.

They will have some time to think about it but hell, more than 2500 years has not been enough or will any
length of time unless they use some of it for reason and thought other than the benefits provided to them by
the people who can not provide the same for themselves.

Perhaps I should not have mentioned that, where I may have had one of you coming on side with moral
purpose, causing you to revert back to the reality, which finances you best.

Perhaps you might ponder your value to the people if you actually served them.

Frank Gallagher

PS

261
From the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General”

Guardian of the rule of law

That most elusive concept- the rule of law- a well established legal principal hard to easily define that
protects the individual and society as a whole.

Conclusive evidence of the incompetence of the law makers and the legal profession who practice under
the concept with nary a thought to structure a legitimate legal system efficient and effective to moral
purpose consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

More to the point it proves the traditional unscrupulous blight on society they really are, founded on
principles that recognizes the supremacy of God and the rule of law being adverse to each other offering
promise of eternal debate conducive only to the immoral where the legal profession plays the major role.

262
May 15 2008

To: AAAAALIST
Particular attention

Mary Dawson
Commissioner Ethics and Conflict of Interest

Louis Theoret http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force


Federal Ombudsman Victims of Crime

Bob MacAdam
RCMP Staff Sergeant

Sgt. Randy Craig


OPP Anti-Rackets

Dear government personnel

As you people are well aware I have provided you all the exact same irrefutable evidence of the
government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy against the individuals of the Lower
Tier, the moral majority.

With Canada well respected around the world and purportedly one of the least corrupted
governments I am aghast at just how corrupted the governments of the world surely must be and
obviously the powers that be of State and Church are responsible for its chaotic state with wars
on going and the really big one persistently looming on the horizon if it has the opportunity before
nature takes it course..

It would be prudent to mention that the evidence I have presented relative to personal real issues
shows my first hand knowledge of the reality and why the moral majority of the populace do not
have a hope in hell due their ignorance and I am not referring to formal education and ability to
do something of value to eek out an existence providing for their basic needs.

I am talking about their ability to think and reason in matters of one common sense conducive to
a serene environment of a peaceful world of consistent harmony among all humankind where
there is only one viable option and that is to abide by the aspirations attributed to God where
Jesus of world renown knew well of the aspirations attributed to God.

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

I have stated over and over again I am not a religious person and it matters not what religion one has been
befuddled by, these words hold true to purpose, which can not be considered words of wisdom for any
sane person capable of reason and thought know these to be fact conducive to world peace and harmony
among all humankind.

If the powers that be of State and Church were competent responsible irreproachable people with fortitude
and conviction to world peace and harmony amongst all humankind the world would be the heaven on
earth unique to every individual’s perception.
263
We all know or could be easily made to understand but obviously the initiative has never been made
simply because the powers that be of State and Church are not competent responsible irreproachable
people with fortitude and conviction to “The Spirit”

They are traditionally avarice unscrupulous people fulfilling their needs in pursuance of wealth and power
that provides them the opportunity to satiate themselves.

Power and wealth obviously provides humongous advantage over the people of the Lower Tier being the
moral majority.

The success of the powers that be is dependent on the cooperation of the people and what better way than
having them believe they are of “The Spirit” and administer and enforce law in “The Spirit”

Of course if they all did the populace of the world would be living in one environment of “The Spirit” but
decidedly we are not.

The fact is there are no initiatives underway to change “How it is” to “How it should be” due the inherent
nature of humankind where the advantaged who have the wherewithal to make things right are of the belief
things are circumstancially fine “How it is” with the environment satiated with opportunity to vigorously
advance their interests.

No doubt every individual would appreciate advantages and if they ever had them they would be reluctant
to give them up.

“Men’s natures are alike; it is their habits that take them far apart”
Where sanity prevails attentive to morality words once considered wisdom become common place.

“He who is sincere hits what is right, and apprehends without the exercise of thought.”

Every move we make is to a purpose such as scratching one’s nose, which is a reaction to an action by
another entity that caused the itch.

No thought is exercised to do so because the mechanicals coordinating the body all connected to the mind,
that sensed the itch and triggered the arm and finger to the task was honed to perfection through time and
experience relative to thought where it becomes instinct.

Most would agree such actions are natural and common place yet not necessarily the right thing to do.

If the itch was caused by poison ivy for example in the minute time it takes to sense the itch and to scratch
it a mind receptive to sound reason and thought could over ride the instinct to scratch it preventing the
spread and address the issue in appropriate manner due the given circumstance..

Obvious to the situation is one had to know it was poison ivy causing the itch to avoid the instinct and
generally one does not derive at that conclusion until the damage is done and symptoms appear.

At that point a reasonable person would change their modus of operandi from plan “A” to plan poison ivy
and would ponder where it came from to avoid future occurrences where ultimately the resolve would be
to eradicate the source but seldom is such an iniative acted upon

264
Priorities and inherent harm play major roles in such matters along with costs and likelihood of success

The rule of thumb to rid oneself of the itch is first not to scratch it and apply an ointment to it particularly
designed to purpose where there are many products available with the producers vying for the sale vital to
the success of their business.

They simply take advantage of a natural phenomenon for profit providing the people a necessity striving to
provide the best product conducive to their success.

Often I wonder why such evil entities are here on earth harmful to humankind, like scorpions, lawyers and
politicians being just “How it is”

We just avoid them whenever possible until a reasonable opportunity comes around to eradicate them from
the face of the earth.

It would not surprise me if the producers of poison ivy ointment actually produced the poison ivy and
planted it for all to itch but attentive to priority I doubt I will ever have time to venture down that road all
though a good cause but rather insignificant to the likes of that which I am addressing.

It is absurd that I even feel I have to address the issues that I am attentive to with the taxpayer having
provided good money and continue to do so to finance the entire government system intended or at least
believed by the majority that they have done so for them to provide the necessities in service of society
conducive to the wellbeing of the people and in Canada as specifically defined in the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms in the intended spirit of the aspirations attributed to God as the Constitution
recognizes the supremacy of God.

Hardly would I be addressing the issues if there were not any and the 3 year undertaking irrefutably proves
the issues are clear and present and will continue to exist until the resolve.

If along the way I stumble across evidence that poison ivy is being deliberately planted I will look into
why with priority of purpose to the wellbeing of humankind.

Often to stay focussed to purpose one must seemingly digress to deal with these relatively simple issues by
addressing the major problem of the predictable nature of humankind where there are 6.6 billion people of
unique perception playing vital roles in the reality of the persistent struggle of humankind, the powers that
be of State and Church who deliberately befuddled their perceptions for wealth and power.

Life is all about trial and error and on route to any purpose much is learned along the way free to be used
for any moral legitimate purpose where often is the case you do not see the forest for the trees and cutting
the trees detrimental to the resolve where one must think before out on a limb cutting it off a tree that isn’t
there.

Imperative to thought and reason, more important than the reason is adeptness to thought and reason with
out which will never have reason to do so.

When one applies thought and reason to conclusion the result is ones purpose.

When one follows instructions to build a boat can it be presumed to float?

265
Sanity insists but sanely I would test it before setting out to sea.
When you have followed the instructions to a tee verified by others and end up with a birdhouse instead of
a place your dog will fit in the plan is definitely for the birds.

When the path to justice leads to a snake pit assuredly a snake posted the way.

One could be exemplary in following instructions and pleased with a pat on the back, yet know naught of
what they have done or how far they have come and would not matter as long as they can bank on the pat
and take it to the bank.

When one has done justice in performance of a job attentive to the letter from beginning to end
but justice not served it must be served upon the author in the spirit intended.

Justice will be had by the people….who were had by lawyer justice

Both the innocent and the guilty will proclaim innocence and hence the necessity of evidence and someone
competent, responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to determine the truth.

The RCMP Final Letter of Disposition will irrefutably and conclusively prove their Disposition consistent
with the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada as invariably they must side with the conspirators,
undoubtedly conspirators themselves.

I highly believe the humongous majority of the RCMP is morally inclined, the Armed Forces and of course
the moral majority of the people of the Lower Tier.

The evidence could not be more convincing of the traditional unscrupulous ways of the powers that be and
their persistent persecution of the people that could not possibly have occurred without the cooperation of
the police.

The RCMP pension fund scandal looked into by the Standing Committee on Public Accounts revealed the
RCMP upper echelon along with the DOJ were linked to the scandal and the Minister of Public Safety
Stockwell Day demonstrated how they instinctively deal with such matters assigning a Task Force of their
people to cover it up and make it look like the matter was seriously and legitimately dealt with.

The evidence is everywhere with the truth yet to be seen because they refuse to table it for obvious reason
with cooperation of the media, the Church, the Charities, Canadian Federation of Tax Payers, Democracy
Watch and so many more where you will find the irrefutable evidence on the Government Charlatan
Roundup web site http://groups.google.com/group/government-charlatan-roundup

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception.

Reality is the consequences of the pursuance of wealth and power of the powers that be of State and
Church undeniable fact as is all the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site as the
evidence of reality was provided to the e-mail addresses on the AAAAAALIST and their failure to deal
with it proves them to be irrefutably incompetent, irresponsible, reproachable with fortitude and
conviction.

266
The responses received were absurd and incoherent to the evidence consistent with the Law Society of
Upper Canada who do not comprehend the relevancy of evidence to the justice they administer
All that separates them from the justice of the people is the evidence getting to the people to determine
their punishment.

I could not foresee any other way of getting the irrefutable evidence than to have them demonstrate their
modus operandi citing laws and policies in real time obviously inconsistent with the Constitution holding
them securely in disrepute.

Justice
Fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even-handedness, fair dealing, honesty, integrity

Democracy
Social equality, equality, egalitarianism

Egalitarianism
Parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality

Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General


Lawyer File # 7

Charter of Rights and Freedoms


http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter

Due to the fact the Charter was written and enacted by members of the Law Societies who are all less than
honorable people traditionally unscrupulous well educated, intelligent with fortitude and conviction to
using the law and their esteemed positions to manipulate the people to service their avarice cravings for
wealth and power that begets wealth and power, obviously having the ability to have written the
Constitution FFF Forthright Forthcoming and Forthright, simple and unambiguous but instead wrote it
with contradiction and conflict built in especially designed to befuddle the issues for long debates
conducive to luxurious lifestyles with humongous advantage to the people of the Upper Tier where the law
could be interpreted in many ways depending on ones ability to plan a route through the maze touching
base with particular statements of the law verbatim using the statements out of context but make them flow
together consistent with the evidence to a favorable conclusion of their client where the protection of the
Law Society members is priority one.

Such manipulations are not consistent with “The Spirit” they would have the people believe and due the
necessity of them to maintain the willingness of the people to believe in them they must be receptive to
arguments based in and of “The Spirit” and hence all debates presented by the Charter Democracy Force
are in and of “The Spirit” attentive to truth which will inevitably defeat the habitual prevaricators with
gravity pulling them from their lofty arrogant shelves that were once elevated by the undue faith and trust
of the people.

267
The Constitution Act, 1982

Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of
law

There is contradiction in the very first line of the Charter and it just never stops purposely embedded
for their ulterior purpose.

Supremacy of God
The Spirit of the Law

Jesus of world renown knew well of the aspirations attributed to God and stated.
“Do unto others as you would have then do unto you”
That is “The Spirit of the law and who purporting to be sane would deny it.

From the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” Ontario web site

The Attorney General is the Guardian of the public interest

The Rule of Law


The Spirit of the letter of lawyers

From the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” Ontario web site

The Attorney General is the Guardian of that most elusive concept-the rule of law- a well established
legal principle hard to easily define that protects the individual and society as a whole

Obviously-the rule of law- is incompetent to protect the individual and society as a whole and yet is the
well established legal principle created by lawyers, only debatable by lawyers, which obviously has to
come out in favor of lawyers.

They were well aware of the incompetence of- the rule of law- and yet they deliberately used these words
in the Charter along side the supremacy of God a direct contradiction for obvious nefarious purpose from
the get go.

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms


1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified
in a free and democratic society.

A person with reasonable evidence of non-compliance of “The Spirit” of the law produced against them
does not have the same status of presumed innocence in compliance with the law but with the presumption
of innocence goes the presumption they will cooperate with the law and naturally want to prove their
innocence thus allowing the police to search their property.
268
A person may well be innocent of that particular charge but refuse a search because there is evidence of
another non-compliance available but they are presumed innocent in compliance with the law and
willingness to cooperate with the law is included with the presumption and when the other evidence is
found during the legal search priority one is to the evidence and the safety and well being of every
individual who is presumed innocent without evidence of non-compliance against them. The found
evidence of a different non compliance puts that person under the subject clause and hence not the status of
the presumed innocent where evidence found is convincing.

The ideology used by lawyers is counter productive to society and the individual has guaranteed Charter
rights not in “The Spirit” of the law but in the spirit of the traditional unscrupulous ways of the lawyers.

Obviously they have included this for their own benefit contrary to the rights of the victim and obstructed
to the safety and well being of society as a whole where priority is to their protection before becoming a
victim where initiatives of punishment attentive to deterrence is mandatory with an out and out war on the
immoral inclined is demanded nipping it in the bud where the decreasing of the immoral increases the
safety and wellbeing of every individual who is legitimately guaranteed Charter rights.

This particular ideology is undoubtedly strictly adhered to protect the lawyers themselves especially they
in the government who are obviously in conflict of interest of the public interest and “The Spirit” of the
law itself where they have the opportunity to manipulate the stock market, get into situations like the
Mulroney/Schreiber scandal and whatever and certainly wouldn’t want the police to be allowed to fish in
these waters reviewing their financial records compared to the decisions they made in the purported benefit
of the public interest which we know certain they do not give a damn about.

The police look at the people in disgust when they will not come forward as witnesses without realizing it
is simple the people can’t count on the police or the system to protect them

“Fine words and an insinuating appearance are seldom are associated with true virtue’

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom
of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of
communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.

Founded on principles of the supremacy of God

Freedom of thought is obviously what I am addressing and emphasize that you all have the freedom of
thought so why not exercise it?

With religions created by the powers that be of State and Church who didn’t write their bibles and
religious books until approximately 265 years after they killed Jesus for spreading the word of “The Spirit”
detrimental to their unscrupulous ways in pursuant of wealth and power where their success depended on
deceiving the people akin to the success of any syndicated organized crime recognizing the power and
influence the aspirations attributed to God had on the people scurried to harness this power for themselves
interpreting the ancient scriptures founded on myths and fabrications adapting them to their own traditional
unscrupulous ways of deception to control the people by programming their minds and having them
believe they too were of “The Spirit” when undeniably and invariably they are not.

269
So which God are we talking about because obviously to keep consistency we must have one common
understanding and it may as well be one of common sense conducive to the benefit of every individual
equally and fair to everyone where the words of Jesus “The Spirit” have it covered.

They must have priority over all matters of law for obvious reason. The law of course must be sane and
designed for the benefit of all people equally and fairly and when interpretations are made on the verbatim
out of context of “The Spirit” you have complicated befuddlements which serve no purpose but to the
benefit of lawyers who thrive on debate to the detriment of the taxpayer.

A debate about the religious rights of the victim and that of the alleged perpetrator could be a contentious
long drawn out debatable subject matter and perhaps give advantage to one religious sect over another
where the victim was only a victim due to his or her religious beliefs but not a victim at all under the
religious beliefs of the alleged perpetrator.

We must remember the source of the beliefs and the purpose the powers that be of State and Church
created them for their own personal benefit and interests and the fact we are all born innocent of empty
mind and susceptible to these charlatanic tyrants and if not for the random place of birth to the
environment of preset culture, customs and religions of the ancestry of one’s parents or guardians could
very well be a stubborn fanatic of an entirely different religion and custom simply due the nature of reality
and invariably conflict arises contrary to the aspirations attributed to the God I am familiar with.

The powers that be of State and Church all proclaim to be acting in the best interest of the people and the
aspirations attributed to the aspirations of the God Jesus of world renown proclaims in the words

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” are precisely consistent and conducive
to the safety and wellbeing of all people and must be “The Spirit” intended of the supremacy of God

With priority to safety and wellbeing of the people purportedly what all religions are founded on the
wearing of a turban on a construction site or motorcycle instead of a hard hat is absurd not consistent with
common sense or the wellbeing of the individual and it is the responsibility of the government to
administer and enforce the law in “The Spirit” for the protection of every individual equally without
discrimination with particular attention to the mentally challenged

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

It is obvious the mentality of people is seriously compromised by their religious beliefs embedded in their
minds purposely for the benefit of the powers that be of State and Church to harness their minds and hence
their bodies into their service in pursuance of wealth and power to satiate their avarice lusts.

By following their religious belief they put themselves in harms way creating an atmosphere of unfairness
to they of like mind but without a religious belief to allow others not to wear a safety head gear.
Further to that when a brick falls on their turban, which perhaps is much better than a baseball cap will
invariably land then in the hospital with the taxpayer unfairly picking up the tab who would be required to
wear a hardhat.

Invariably if they are legally allowed on the construction site without a hard hat there are litigation
concerns as to their right to sue for damages where the hardhat would have protected them rather than
270
knocking them senseless where they could sue for cash for life on the grounds their minds have been
seriously impaired and another lawyer could argue their mental competence in the first place pitting a
turban up against a brick rather than a hardhat especially made for such an occurrence.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

Obviously every taxpayer is deprived by the absurdity of a legal system operated by members of the Law
Society of Upper Canada who are of the “Mightier than thou and do not give a damn about the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights” attitude who lead the people to believe they are there for them in the best
interest of society acting under the authority of the Constitution.
They, who do not comprehend the relevancy of evidence and the meaning of the word justice, who would
have us believe they are there to administer and enforce it.

The exception is akin to the subject only to…..in 1.

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified
in a free and democratic society.

A person with evidence provided against them in non-compliance of the law is not of the upper status
guaranteed to every individual of protection and benefit in all matters before and under the law.

I reiterate “The Spirit” is to protect the moral people of society from the immoral thereby being conducive
to a moral society where every individual must be in “The Spirit” to be in compliance with the law and to
be so must abide by the words of Jesus
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” which are not only easily reasoned
to be fair and conducive to a moral society but are easy to judge a person by when in non-compliance.

I reiterate with the presumption of innocence goes the presumption one cooperates with the law ensuring
the sanctity of it which protects them and every individual equally fair where the safety and well being of
every individual as guaranteed by the Charter is dependent on the adeptness and consistency of the
administration and enforcement of it where ultimately every individual is responsible to do their part and
abide and cooperate with it.

A person who is presumed innocent being a responsible person in compliance with the law maintains that
presumption when cooperating with the enforcement of it and if they are indeed innocent as presumed they
would be aghast at any non-compliance alleged against them and would adamantly proclaim their
innocence as would a guilty person with one exception that they would allow the police to prove their
innocence which any sane and moral person would do and allow them to search their property conducive
to that endeavour.

Any objection is adverse to “The Spirit” plain and simple, which is the way the law must be consistently
administered and enforced so as not to deprive the taxpayer and most important to due diligence in the
support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

The presumption of innocence is dependent on ones actions consistent with the presumption and adverse
actions compromise the presumption putting them in the status of the subject to in (1.) and except in (7.).

271
Once again any other interpretation and especially the ideology of the members of the Law Societies are
contrary to “The Spirit” conducive to immoral inclination detrimental to the public interest.

12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.

Every individual unduly suffers to the administration and enforcement of the law by the law Society
members and are certainly unusually punished being completely innocent yet forced to pay for the
unscrupulous ways of the members.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Obviously with the members of the Law Society administering and enforcing the law being of the wrong
attitude and spirit adverse to “The Spirit” of the law our Charter rights are not guaranteed and thusly there
is no protection where they of the Society thrive and luxuriously excel feasting off the symptoms of their
deliberate incompetence to support the individual’s Charter rights.

They not only do not support the mentally challenged but they create the mentally challenged where we are
all mentally challenged in matters of the law they administer not being founded on moral common sense
where the private sector have different fields of endeavour where attentiveness to competence and
responsibility to purpose is prerequisite to successful providence of the necessities of life.

24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or
denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers
appropriate and just in the circumstances.

There is no mention of money and why should there be because we finance the entire government
personnel to structure a system competent to the support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
and money would compromise “The Spirit” and in particular the terms of 15.1 could not possibly be met.

Equal protection, benefit and justice under the law is what every individual is guaranteed and expects but
the system designed by the members of the Law Society is “One for the Money…Two for the Show”
attempting to have us believe they are there for us while obviously justice is the furthest thing from their
minds as they have made a mockery of democracy and the Constitution in pursuance of money conducive
to the power and wealth they have traditionally unscrupulously pursued.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters
within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest

272
Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters
within the authority of the legislature of each province.

They have no more authority than that which the Constitution provides and they are financed by the people
only to efficiently and effectively provide the necessities of a moral society consistent with the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s equal rights.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or
effect.

Under the particularly absurd and pathetic circumstance with the members of the Law Society of Upper
Canada not giving a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights administering and enforcing the
law which requires them to be competent, responsible irreproachable people of fortitude and conviction to
the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights it is incomprehensible that any of their laws, policies, standards
and routines are consistent with the Constitution and in fact the evidence is irrefutable of their modus
operandi adverse to “The Spirit” of the law that granted them authority and hence their authority is of no
force or effect.

The evidence is overwhelming and consistent to the government organized crime of corruption and
conspiracy against the individual’s of the Lower Tier, the people of the moral majority and in the name of
justice should be brought before the people to account for their actions.

I have persistently requested the prominent government personnel in the AAAAALIST to account and they
have consistently refused to.

I have made every effort to remove them from the spell cast upon them by the powers that be of State and
Church and have in fact provided the evidence to the Archbishop of Toronto providing him the opportunity
to stand up for the people in “The Spirit” of the law and the aspirations attributed to God where they have
the gull to call the Church the house of the Lord and intervene in the purpose of conscience in protection of
the individuals bestowing upon themselves the right to forgive where only the person victimized can apply
justice to where sincere remorse must be shown before they are caught and sincerity determined by their
attentiveness to recompense injury.

Sanity and common sense plays a vital role in an intended legitimate moral society in and of “The Spirit”

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

The RCMP Commissioner’s Final Letter of Disposition is due on May 21 2008 (6 days)

273
The administrators and enforcers of the law under the authority of the Constitution are obviously advised
at the federal level by DOJ being a permanent fixture in the justice system whereas the Minister of Justice
and Attorney General of Canada is a temporary position appointed by the Prime Minister, the leader of the
political party in power.

The Minister has a responsibility to advise all government departments and agencies in the administering
and enforcement of the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights being the
Guardian of the public interest.

There simply can not be different interests between the application of the law and the protection of the
people consistent with the Constitution or the Minister is in conflict of interest and as for the DOJ they
must be fixed in their position strictly adhering to the law unbiased keeping the governments in power in
line with the Constitution always with priority to the Charter rights of every individual and society as a
whole intent on a moral society.

The immoral have no rights other than the subject to in 1.and the exception in 7.

It is not about giving immorality a fair chance and the lawyers something to debate for a luxurious
lifestyle.

The immorally inclined have the same fair chance as the rest of us to abide by the law in “The Spirit”
where the law is clear and must be to prevent the traditionally unscrupulous members of the law society
from ripping the taxpayer off.

The criminally inclined have an unfair advantage over the moral majority who abide by the rules and
presume the administers and enforcers of the law are doing so consistent with the Constitution conducive
to the individuals guaranteed Charter rights.

When they don’t the people are sitting ducks for the criminal element, which assuredly includes the
members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who are obviously not of “The Spirit”

The evidence shows that is precisely the intention of the members of the Law Society.

I point out once again the inherent conflict of the first line of the Charter.
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

The supremacy of God is most definitely in “The Spirit” conducive to the individuals guaranteed Charter
rights which the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is the Guardian of the public interest.

He is also the Guardian of that most elusive concept- the rule of law- a well established legal principle hard
to easily define which protects the individual and society as a whole.

This information is straight from the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” Ontario web
site.

It is impossible to protect the individuals in accordance with “The Spirit” as guaranteed with the rule of
law being obvious to the Conflict of Interest and the traditional conniving unscrupulous ways of the
members of the Law Society.

274
That is irrefutable evidence in itself.
Obviously “The Spirit” has priority being particularly fair to the public interest and in a democracy where
the majority rules would decidedly be the way a non- manipulated vote would go and only the immoral
would argue against it but not likely would they do it openly in public but reserve it for their day in court.

The Constitution recognizes the supremacy of God giving “The Spirit” priority over the rule of law and yet
the Minister of Justice and Attorney General has irrefutability given priority to his responsibility as
Guardian of the rule and law with indifference to his responsibility as Guardian of the public interest.

When one stays focussed on the purpose of law being the priority to protect the people from the immoral
inclined it is apparent attentiveness must be to the elimination of immoral persuasion and ultimately it is
the responsibility of the Minister of Justice and the responsibility of the DOJ to keep him in line.

(DOJ) Department of Justice

The name of the department suggests they should be competent in administering Justice

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

It is either stated or implied the government personnel involved in the legal system especially the DOJ and
the Minister of Justice are competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to
administer and enforce the law consistent with the Constitution conducive to the support of the guarantee
to every individual especially since it was the federal government that enacted it in 1982.

Sanity is prerequisite.

Focus and priority must be to the intent of the law and the members of the Law Society have irrefutably
proven their intent is for money and they do not give a damn about the law or the people.

The evidence is everywhere embedded in the laws they wrote under the authority of the Constitution when
administered and enforced do not support the very guarantee they made to the people being
incomprehensible since the Minister of Justice is the Guardian of the public interest and provided the
wherewithal to structure a system conducive to the support of the Charter.

The effective and efficient direction to any initiative is a straight line and the modus operandi of the legal
system is a woven web of deceit where you can begin from any point of the perimeter of the web and set
out on a straight line but invariably be bounced around like a pinball that will stop where only the members
of the Law Society knows.

The laws, rules, regulations, customs and policies of the people involved in the legal system are not
consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and are in fact
evidence of the incompetent, irresponsible, reproachable unscrupulous people who administer and enforce
them with fortitude and conviction.

Clearly under the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” the Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada is responsible to ensure the entire administration and enforcement of the

275
law is done competently, responsibly and irreproachably with fortitude and conviction to the support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

Clearly the enactment of the Federal Accountability Act 2006 by the Prime Minister and the Minister of
Justice is an admittance the Minister of Justice and others of authority are irresponsible adverse to the
Attorney General’s responsibilities as defined in the “Roles and Responsibities……”

Obviously an attempt to cover up his responsibility and of course an astronomical waste of tax payers
money appointing the Commissioner of Ethics and Conflict of Interest Mary Elizabeth Dawson who has
been provided the evidence of the Conflict of Interest of the Minister and of Justice and Attorney General
who has refused to deal with the issues and obviously doesn’t have a clue about Conflict of Interest having
been trained in the illegitimate system created from the office of the Minister, the DOJ.

By her not dealing with the issues irrefutably proves the Accountability Act was not enacted in “The
Spirit” but consistent with the spirit of the members of the Law Society.

Once one is in “The Spirit” everything becomes unambiguously lucid and they who do not see it are
obviously not of “The Spirit” but not absolute of one being in on the conspiracy but assuredly not
competent to administer and enforce the law in “The Spirit”

This will be my last attempt to bring you people on side with “The Spirit” and my efforts have given you
all every opportunity to think and reason which are prerequisites of competence and with the presumption
you are well educated your responses will be indicative of the formal education and training of the
government education and legal systems.

Anyone can memorize information and many so much better than others, but without the ability to think
and reason competent to legitimate purpose are no smarter than a first grader.

The evidence presented in the 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada is clear and simple to understand they
of the Law Society are not conducive to justice and “The Spirit” being adamantly opposed and if they truly
did respond in compliance with the Standards and regulations of their authority it clearly demonstrates the
incompetence of the authority that published it.

It is incomprehensible that any of you on the AAAAALIST would not be able to comprehend that which
the evidence irrefutably shows and they in investigative positions of fraud and government corruption
should be cognizant of the importance of evidence in any investigation of sound reasoning and thought and
in particular when I am charging that the modus operandi of the establishment is adverse to the
Constitution and the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights it is absurd they wouldn’t
analyze the evidence in comparison with the laws, rules, regulations and policies they routinely follow set
up consistent with the conspiracy by the office of the DOJ and the Attorney Generals.

Unfortunately that is how they are educated and trained with experience gained from watching them in
action where ultimately they are incoherent to the law and consult with the Attorney Generals or their
agents or staff of the DOJ.

Of course if they studied the law and were as up on it as well as the Attorney Generals and understood it in
the same spirit they would be lawyers, not investigators and be in on the conspiracy.

276
That is why it is imperative to comprehend “The Spirit” of the law and what is and what is not in support
of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

When one is in “The Spirit” it fits like a glove.

“He who is sincere hits what is right, and apprehends without the exercise of thought”

Ultimately the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition due early next week will be indicative of their spirit and
whether or not they are competent responsible irreproachable people of fortitude and conviction to “The
Spirit” and purpose of the law.

It is predictable he will cite the RCMP Act and other laws, rules, regulations and policies and presumed he
is a competent authority to do so which will ultimately prove their modus operandi is consistent with the
conspiracy adverse to the “The Spirit” conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which is
priority one of the public interest that the Attorney Generals are the Guardians.

The Attorney Generals must be held accountable and are responsible for the publics interests consistent
with the supreme law of Canada as clearly stated in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney
General” and clearly proven to be pathetically irresponsible by the enactment of the federal Accountability
Act, 2006 and the refusal of the Commissioner of Ethics and Conflict of Interest Mary Elizabeth Dawson
to address the issues I presented clearly shows the intent of the enactment was not that which they would
have the public believe being consistent with their modus operandi.

What more could be obvious of their non conviction to support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights
than the limitations of authority provided to the government departments and agencies such as the Ontario
Ombudsman, the Commission on Ethics and Conflict of Interest, the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of
Crime amongst many and in fact the entire conglomeration of government departments and agencies where
with all the money paid into its structure by the taxpayers of the belief they are their for the people the
evidence irrefutably dispels that notion because not one of them acted competently, responsibly and
irreproachably with fortitude and conviction to support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

There is not enough intelligence putting all their heads together to see to it that the legal system is
competent to that purpose.

For the last time prior to the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition I request you all to put your heads together
for the diligent support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

Commissioner Mary Elizabeth Dawson I once again request you attend to the issues pertinent to your
authority and if you are of the opinion you are without authority to deal with the issues of the Conflict of
Interests of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada I would appreciate an immediate
response from you explaining why.

277
I remind you all are financed under the authority of the Constitution and those of you in the investigative
sector most certainly must be competent and responsible to purpose
Were you assigned your position because of your competence to the Constitution or because of you
incompetence or your willingness to the incompetence?

Frank Gallagher

278
The Constitution Act, 1982: Document
Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize

The Spirit

The Threshold of Sanity and Legitimate Law


____________________________________________________________________
the supremacy of God and the rule of law

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency,
of no force or effect.

Forthright Sanity in
Forthwith “ The Spirit”
Forthcoming Rules

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception

The rule of law is the work of the devil, the archenemy of God and the populace of the world hence
the struggle of humankind

Approximately 6.6 billion people of unique perception and common needs populate the world in the
absence of common sense where cultures, customs and religious beliefs initiated by the traditionally
unscrupulous powers that be of State and Church are conducive to the struggle of humankind

The Charter Democracy Force founded in Canada in of and with “The Spirit” has embarked on an
intensive initiative to eradicate the devil spirit from the conscience of our minds being priority one to the
induction of sense in common world wide creating a spiritual environment where sane discussions

279
conducive to the sanctity of the environment and humanity can be reasoned with common sense fair to
every individual of the world who exists in of and with “The Spirit”
Prerequisite to the initiative is the staffing of the Charter Democracy Force with competent responsible
irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction in of and with “The Spirit” in perpetual continuity
attentive to truth conducive to a firm grasp of reality.

“The Spirit”

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

Free

Integrity
Irreproachable
World Sanity
Evolution
Analysis of the evidence published and referenced on the Charter Democracy Force web site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
has irrefutably proven the powers that be of State and Church are possessed of the devil, professional
charlatans pretending to be in of and with “The Spirit” in pursuance of wealth and power with the cooperation
of the affluent and influential in a “scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours” philosophy teamed against the
world’s populace keeping them in a “barefoot and pregnant” environment so to speak, in water up to their
necks where it is difficult to focus on the cause while fighting off alligators due the refusal of the powers that
be to drain the swamp.

They have deliberately sabotaged the people’s safety and well being to satiate their traditional unscrupulous
avarice appetites for wealth and power pitting the world’s populace against each other.

They gain their power by lies and deceit and use the people’s money collected through taxes to
280
structure a system against the people protecting themselves with police and armies we pay for.
Are you smarter than a fifth grader?

Which illustration depicts the ideal of civilization intended by the powers that be of State and
Church with the enactment of the Constitution of Canada?

A or B
Illustration A

The Threshold of Sanity and Legitimate Law

__________________________________________________________________________________

Illustration B

The Threshold of Sanity and Legitimate Law

__________________________________________________________________________________

A. The answer is obviously A because the powers that be of State and Church are the only people with
the wherewithal to make reality “How it is” being clearly documented as to “How it is” on the
Charter Democracy Force web site where their modus operandi doesn’t even meet the terms
defined by democracy.

Their modus operandi is consistent with the assertion by Edmund Morgan referenced in Jonathan
Swainger’s book, consistent with the Roles and “Responsibilities of the Attorney General” the rule
of law, and the justice administered by the Law Society of Upper Canada in the 2 Part document.

281
B. Is for belief, that which they would have us believe and I can confidently attest to the fact
illustration B. with “The Sprit” on top of the Devil is the only way to make the belief true where a
true democracy consists of the following properties.

Justice
Fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even-handedness, fair dealing, honesty, integrity

Democracy
Social equality, equality, egalitarianism

Egalitarianism
Parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality

The theory that goes with the right to vote is the elected representatives will represent the people and all
political parties are in of and with “The Spirit” attentive to a one tiered system fair to every individual
where the system is well financed with the infrastructure put in place with all overhead covered by the
people.

Their priority one is to structure a system adept to the properties of a democracy but obviously the term
democracy itself is part of the deception and I can attest to the fact the people also believe they live in a
democracy.

The entire system is not designed conducive to a democracy but is consistent with organized crime
however much more sophisticated having the entire legal system in their pocket paid for by the people
whereas the populace who should be presumed innocent are presumed guilty of wanting what they are
entitled to under the law as they are led to believe but of course do not understand the concept that it is
only make believe and therefore the entire system is designed to deal with these poor looser types like me
who insist on the justice they would have me believe where I revert to common sense and the definition of
the words to define the justice I am intent on getting.

Though I thoroughly understand the realities that they are administering and enforcing their intent of the
laws they enacted and the entire system personnel are well educated and trained in support of that endeavor
so convincingly that the people accept what they are doing is in fact the law and the immediate
interpretation of the verbiage of the Charter should anyone bother to look appears precisely as they are led
to believe which is consistent with the concept where charlatans accomplish their objective taking what
they want leaving their pigeons content confirming ignorance is bliss necessary for their success founded
on deception in pursuant of the wealth and power they so aggressively aspire to.

Intent plays a significant role when interpreting law and often I hear commentary on CPAC of people who
were present back when the Constitution was being assembled and would attest to that which was intended
by so and so as they knew them well and whatever spiel they will use to keep their intent well and alive
putting emphasis on such things as if to provide credence to their intent.

Precedence also plays a major role as they often refer to case so and so versus so and so and the decision
made in similar circumstances to suggest this has been already well thought out and has been accepted as
law and business decisions were made based on the precept.

282
If the conclusion based on such precedent or such intent does not meet the intent of democracy the
evidence is only evidence of the illegitimate intent for the obvious reason absolutely no one and especially
the powers that be will support any argument that Canada is not a democracy.

The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” clearly defines the responsibilities of the
Attorney General prior to the enactment of the Constitution in 1982 where invariably it proves it is not
attentive to democracy as defined in books of reference commonly known.

Democracy
Social equality, equality, egalitarianism

Egalitarianism
Parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality

Common sense consistent with reality insists just by reasoning and declaring Canada is founded on
principles, that recognize the supremacy of God that everyone will not abide by “The Spirit” intended even
though the intent is consistent with democracy and common sense.

We know everyone who goes to Church is not convincing they are of “The Spirit” although should be best
informed, and they who do not go to Church are not convincing they are not of “The Spirit” and in my
book are most likely to be of “The Spirit” having the ability to reason things out sanely as to the reality and
value of truth where often people who go to Church are just looking for something to believe in obviously
unable to reason but will argue loyal to their faith against truths and the resultant actualities due their
convictions.

One capable of sane reason will know certain the aspirations attributed to God are wrapped up in one neat
tidy package by the words of Jesus who is world renown to be quite familiar with the aspirations of God
who said:
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”
It is irrelevant as to whether or not God exists or ever did and whether or not Jesus said the words which
doesn’t make them sane and right because he said them but clearly if he did say them attests to his sanity
and ability to reason as to a simple path to peace on earth as it is in heaven, being a constant variable of
progression in pursuance of a quality existence in continuity of betterment.

Jesus in fact just paraphrased the words of Confucius known for his words of wisdom some 2500 years ago
who said:

“Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself”
These words of both Jesus and Confucius suggest to me the ignorance of the times and assuredly the
ignorance remains with those who attend religious readings today where the ultimate quest of Jesus was to
make all the people aware that the heaven on earth they pray for is at their fingertips if they all abide by the
concept.

With the moral majority understanding the concept, the leaders of the religious sects purportedly
attempting to get “The Spirit” across, the government personnel of the legal system purportedly
administering and enforcing the law consistent with “The Spirit” as recognized by the supremacy of God

283
and the entire work force financing the legal system it is incomprehensible that amoral inclination can not
be eradicated conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, consistent with “The Spirit” and
the principles of Democracy, unless of course one of the properties is false.

The Charter Democracy Force has exhaustively investigated and identified for certain the source of the
problem, which was obvious to anyone whose intent was to the support of the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights, in the confines of Democracy by definition and “The Spirit” simply defined

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

I reiterate it matters not what ones intent was in writing the law or in fact what Jesus’ intent was of the
words or even if he spoke them although I believe he did indeed say them and he led his life consistent
with the words and didn’t do it for money from my understanding or why would he and his followers only
have a few loaves of bread to feed the masses or perhaps this is just another myth.

I do know persons who succeed founded on myths and lies are consistent with that attributed to charlatans
and they do so for their own good not the persons they deceive with them.

To get directly to the point in a democracy it is imperative to abide by the terms as defined or you simply
do not exist in a democracy.

Democracy
Social equality, equality, egalitarianism

Egalitarianism
Parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality

According to Jonathan Swainger a University of British Columbia history professor Edmund Morgan’s
compelling book “Inventing the People: The Popular Rise of Sovereignty in England and America”
Prerequisite to the success of any form of government is competent responsible irreproachable personnel
with fortitude and conviction consistent to a tyrannical government that depends on loyalty to the intent as
they must deceive the people having them believe they live in a democracy with a voice and their
representatives are the people.

So in a democracy it is necessary for the people to believe they exist in a democracy.

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms


1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free
and democratic society.

So there it is (s.1) and so I believe under the supreme law of Canada we live in a democracy and rightly so
as I presume the Charter was signed by the authorities legally permitted to do so.

I will not bother to address how they got their authority and will remain with the presumption.
I will also presume they wrote it under the authority consistent with democracy having no authority to do
other wise and hence did not have the authority to deceive the people to believing they are in a democracy
while their intent was tyrannical.

284
The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” was clearly written prior to 1982 because the
Charter is not mentioned or is the “Roles and Responsibilities……” consistent with the Constitution or
conducive to the support of the individuals guaranteed Charter rights as it states the Attorney Generals are
responsible to see that all government departments and agencies perform their responsibilities consistent
with the Constitution which invariably means they must be staffed with competent responsible
irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to the support of every individual as guaranteed by
the Charter where it concerns everyone of the government services and the public sector.

The Attorney Generals are responsible to be the Guardians of the public interest and the Guardians of that
most elusive concept- the rule of law- a well established legal principle hard to easily define that protects
the individual and society as a whole.

Given that this was written prior to the 1982 enactment of the Constitution it was most definitely not
consistent with legitimate democracy as defined for there is no hint of equality, parity, fairness or whatever
of the terms of Democracy because the protection of the people, the public interest was the responsibility
of the Attorney General as Guardian of the public interest but could hardly be protected to the standard
expected of Democracy with –the rule of law- that is defined by them as an elusive concept and hard to
easily define which they go further to say is a well established legal principle, obviously established by
people of their unscrupulous ilk whose obvious intention being members of the legal profession is to take
advantage of the people at every opportunity that avails itself obviously for money and not justice in
accordance with the definition of democracy.

They have the mitigated gull to state the incompetence of the rule of law being a well established legal
principle that clearly exposes their intent, for obviously they had knowledge of its incompetence to satisfy
the terms of Democracy and they had a long time to deal with the issue to make the laws competent to
Democracy and who else has the authority to make them competent and who had the authority to make the
laws incompetent in the first place?

Never the less the fact is clear they knew of the incompetence of the rule of law when they included it in
the Constitution Act, 1982 in the very first line of Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
“Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law”

This evidence alone is convincing of their intent not consistent with the fundamentals of Democracy, or
competent to back up the guarantee to every individual, however consistent with any form of government,
which includes Tyranny, and of course consistent with that which was asserted by Edmund Morgan in the
book by British Columbia University history professor Jonathan Swinger.

He is also a recipient of my writings included in the AAAAAALIST and he had knowledge of the
incompetence of the government back when he wrote the book as did Edmund Morgan and he now has the
evidence I provided him verifying the concept but as of yet has not come forward consistent with the rest
on the AAAALIST which is predictable and consistent with the conspiracy.

Also it is humongously obvious and predictable if the populace of Canada were aware of the conspiracy, in
a democracy where the majority purportedly rule the moral majority would not tolerate their deliberate
intent to conspire against the very people who finance them providing the extraordinary opportunity to take
them for all they can without starving too many to cause them to rise against them where the starving are
too busy keeping their heads above water without the wherewithal to organize or get anyone’s attention as
I have irrefutably proven by persistent efforts over the passed 3 years their indifferent to the meaning of
the word democracy, the foundation fundamental to all that the law stands for under the supremacy of God

285
and are as intent as the original conspirators whose intentions were not founded on or consistent with
democracy, let alone the Charter, “The Spirit” and the wellbeing of the people who they deceive having
them believe they are there for the people without the slightest evidence they are.

They see to it they have the necessities to get to work for them where education is of vital importance to
the success of the people of the Upper Tier who benefit the most as they connive together with the
government keeping their wages well below what they contribute to their profit.

Much can be said on any topic I raise and many can articulate much better and assuredly the people on the
AAAALIST but obviously will not consistent with their obvious intent.

Given all that has been said and done, written and documented it is incomprehensible that RCMP Staff
Sergeant R.B. MacAdam assigned by the RCMP Commissioner’s office to investigate my complaint of
government organized crime and conspiracy would be incompetent to such a challenge if the system was
designed with legitimate intent as defined by Democracy, documented by the Constitution Act, 1982, in
“The Spirit” as recognized in the supremacy of God, consistent and conducive to a moral society where
every individual plays a major role responsible to comply with the law and ultimately “The Spirit” clearly
defined in the words:
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

Too easy to comprehend the concept to abide by and be judged by not to be understood by a professional
assigned to judge the evidence as provided to the RCMP Staff Sergeant as published on the web and given
that it has taken more than 6 months it is a sane presumption he has studied the evidence well and should
have a firm understanding of that which the evidence irrefutably shows and if not he had as much time as
needed to that certainty where the wellbeing of the people of the Lower Tier, the moral majority is now
wholly dependent on the conscience of RCMP Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam.

The others have feeble excuses but Staff Sergeant Bob hasn’t the slightest having benefit of all the
evidence of such a consistency of all department and agencies following in the intent of the Attorney
Generals as defined in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published to present date
on the Ontario web site where 26 years later after the enactment of the Constitution there is no mention of
the Charter and the Attorney Generals responsibilities as defined are incompetent to support the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights being consistent with the government modus operandi and that of
the Law Society of Upper Canada obviously incompetent to administer and enforce the Constitution to the
acquisition of justice where money is their purpose while putting on extravagant shows appearing to be for
justice which ultimately and humongously deprives the taxpayer, all the people of the moral majority of
their guaranteed right of protection and benefits in all matters before and under the law guaranteeing their
success as well as others of their ilk immorally inclined.

No matter the thinking of the conspirators the evidence remains attesting to the truth and it will get to the
public and it can do so with Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s integrity in tact or not but with his decision
goes the integrity of the RCMP which the jury is still out on and will be most convincing as to how he
deals with these most serious issues of the persistent ravaging of the people of the moral majority simply
because they are there with nobody or the wherewithal to protect themselves from these cowardly thieves
who hide behind “The Spirit” as only the devil would do asserting their allegiance to “The Spirit” with
both hands in the moral majority’s pockets taking all they can get away with and then focussing on the
courts where they inevitably hit the people again attentive to what they can get for themselves from the

286
insurance companies and raising consumer costs as are all losses due to theft and their incompetence to
structure an efficient cost effective system to eradicate immoral inclination from the face of the earth.

This of course would be adverse to their purpose and eventually find them out on the streets looking for
jobs of worth while purpose like the rest of us of the moral majority.

The system is designed for them to feast off the symptoms of their deliberate incompetence and that is
“How it is” at this moment in time May 19 2008.

In my last writing of May 15 2008 I stated that would be my last correspondence to the AAAAALIST
prior to the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition and at the time I thought assuredly it would be but I would
be remiss if I did not forward this letter now prior to the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition if there is one
thing in this letter not grasped before by RCMP Staff Sergeant Bob and more importantly I do not want the
public to have the slightest doubt as to what should be expected of the Final Letter of Disposition.

I bring your attention once again to the RCMP pension fund scandal when the Standing Committee on
Public Accounts was ordered to sit on it when a PUBLIC INQUIRY was warranted when the DOJ was
linked to it.

Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day stepped in and offered that it would be a humongous waste of
taxpayers money when they could competently deal with it in the manner of a Task Force and ultimately as
predictable consistent with their modus operandi the Task Report never mentioned that which was the
purpose of initiating the Task Force in lieu of the PUBLIC INQUIRY that was warranted and would have
come to the truth.

The Minister gave me the “Benevolence, Righteousness and Morality” ploy too and a copy of his letter is
published on the Charter Democracy Force web site as “Stockwell Day November 3 2007 but now they
use the “Accountable and Transparency” ploy commencing with the enactment of the Federal
Accountability Act, 2006 which is documented factual evidence of the ploy and the conspiracy in an
attempt to cover up the irresponsible Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada who is legally
responsible to be responsible as attested to by the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” and
according to the letter from his office dated January 22 2007 a copy of which can be found on page 23 of
the Government Correspondence compiled September 1 2007 document.

There are a prodigious number of questions asked yet not answered and I expect these answers in the Final
Letter of Disposition where left unanswered is consistent with the conspiracy as they are questions which
answer them selves left unanswered.

The “Threshold” matter most assuredly needs to be addressed as there simply is not one possible
conceivable piece of evidence I could have provided to prove any different than that I allege and the
evidence irrefutably shows including the crime being recorded as it was committed.

Every piece of incoherent and absurd correspondence received from the government departments and
agencies are under the advisement of either the Ontario Attorney General or the federal Minister of Justice
and Attorney General of Canada and ultimately they have advised adverse to their responsibility as
Guardian of the public interest but conducive to their responsibilities as Guardian of the rule of law which
is incompetent to the public interest adverse to the spirit of the law and “The Spirit” .

287
The “Roles and Responsibilities………” begins with his responsibilities wearing many hats as if the
Crown, Cabinet or whatever have responsibilities adverse to the Constitution and detrimental to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where he can not possibly be attentive as Guardian of the public
interest and stand by watching them perform in a manner inconsistent with the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights.

He has the advantage of first hand knowledge of all that goes on under the authority of all the hats he
wears and ultimately is the one and only person purportedly representing the people as the Guardian of the
public interest and it is his opinion that advises the entire government departments and agencies where he
even has the right not to prosecute when the police lay reasonable charges ensuring his conspiracy secure
which obviously is not just his conspiracy but who ever wrote the “Roles and Responsibilities of the
Attorney General’ who knew well of that most elusive concept –the rule of law- a well established legal
principle hard to easily define being particularly advantageous to the members of the Law Societies who
are not required to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and evidence plays no role
in their decision of complaints against their members.

That is consistent with the responses I have received where they were incoherent to the evidence and
refused every effort I made to make them coherent.

If Staff Sergeant Bob determines the evidence does not meet the so called “Threshold” to prosecute or
investigate it is he who sits as judge and jury but unauthorized to do so not being a judge and certainly
doesn’t meet the legitimate number of jurists.

The evidence as it stands requires no investigation because it has been exhaustively done and they are
guilty of that which I allege as they have refused to act in support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights ensuring the individual is not guaranteed Charter rights being at the very least criminally fraudulent
in nature as they put on the façade of serving justice consistent with the Constitution.

This is a matter of the most serious kind and yet the RCMP have the right not to address the complaint if it
is frivolous or vexatious in nature and yet the government responses have surpassed any height of vexation
subjecting me to cruel and unusual treatment all though assuredly they could produce cases and statistics
that would confirm the way they have treated me and the evidence usual due their intent of conspiracy and
fortitude and conviction not to be caught.

12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.

The time has come to put a legitimate modus operandi in place consistent with the Constitution, where
there is not an intelligent argument available to the intelligent members of the legal profession nor the
government representatives who have no more authority than to perform conducive to the Charter where
continuance of their hokus pokus deprives every taxpayer of money they could use to buy food for their
families which costs are on the rise due their incompetence and unscrupulous attitude.

I wonder what their investment portfolios show?


Very high in the banks I heard. How about food.

32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters
within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest
Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters
within the authority of the legislature of each province.

288
Bob

You have the opportunity of a lifetime to begin the end of the struggle of humankind and introduce sanity
to the world.

That is more than God could ever hope to achieve by sitting on his ass and I could not say for fact if he
even has one or any other part of a body akin to human as purportedly we were created in his image.

We can do no more than our best and no less than our best and to that endeavour we will soon know what
you are best at.

Often we do not have the opportunity to test the limits in either direction, and enthusiasm plays a major
role.

If you are not willing to get the answers to the obvious questions inferred in the documents you are not the
competent, responsible irreproachable person of fortitude and conviction to the well being of the public
interest as every individual’s Charter rights are guaranteed or they are not, either way a criminal offence
requiring a PUBLIC INQUIRY and do not let the Minister of Public Safety suggest a Task Force is
apropos.

Only sane rational competent responsible irreproachable people of fortitude and conviction in of and with
“The Spirit” can determine what is to be done and whom better than government personnel who are
believed to be representatives of the people and know what it takes to get elected and know how to behave
before the public.

They will be forced to perform to the standard they have convinced the people to believe and they will be
watching out for the likes of the Minister of Public Safety who doesn’t give a damn about the individual’s
any more than the entire government personnel who are only concerned for the vote and haven’t the
slightest idea of how to thank them for the confidence they have provided them with the jobs they so
ambitiously pursued with the people having no idea while they are smiling and shaking their hands, they
intend to ransack at every opportunity that presents itself where they will do their jobs incompetently at
best with no worry because the people will pick up the tab first before they deal with their own
responsibilities.

The governments all over the world are of the same ilk and are responsible for all the people dieing of
starvation and thirst, improper heath care and on and on as they can not possibly attend to the issues in the
spirit of the legal profession where justice is determined if they make out like bandits and what was their
haul and did they leave anything behind that could have been got if they had of been more professional.

If you are people you will get the message as people will and if you have a semblance of conscience to
humanity I of course suggest you dig deep for it now.

I can assure you there will be no repercussions because there will be no one to repercuss and in fact you
will play a major role in the restructuring of the system but obviously will not compare with the role you
would play initiating the PUBLIC INQUIRY.

289
If I had anything to do with it I would see that you retired ASAP with the RCMP Commissioners pension
at the very least and with little more thought I would consider the sum total of pensions of the government
personnel you are instrumental in getting a conviction achieving much more than they could ever have in
the unscrupulous spirit they persist.

Oh well, a fellow can get carried away in such wishful thinking and who am I, just another Canadian
citizen trying to glean his way to the guaranteed justice promised by the federal government they had no
intention to support.

Frank Gallagher

PS

They will know justice.

Just days to RCMP Final Letter of Disposition


Feel free to take another month if you should reason to change your mind consistent with the Constitution
conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

To: Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP

I hope you have taken the opportunity to become competent and useful to the public that pays your
way.

Please confirm receipt of this document.

290
December 30, 2008

The rule of law is a well established legal principle but the Wikipedia makes no mention as to that
most elusive concept hard to easily define as stated in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney
General” published on the Ontario web site.

The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law

The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law
Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately
exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established
procedural steps that are referred to as due process.
The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.
According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a clear
separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law.

The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become
meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"

So there we have it…The Canadian Government is an ideological abuser that has rendered –the rule
of law-meaningless to legitimate purpose with the members of the Law Societies having messed with
it for their luxurious benefit to ransack the people as they put on a façade to be there for the people.

“Everybody Knows” as Leonard Cohen sang years ago but they just do not know what to do.

The answer is obvious

Bring the conspirators before the people’s courts with the proceedings
scrutinized by the people consistent with the Constitution conducive to every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as they are made to answer to the
evidence provided by “URus Charter Democracy Force ROP” packaged in the
BLACK BOOK editions referenced on their site www.URus.ca

291
May 20 2008

The Devil stole the minds of the Powers that be of State and Church
who stole The Spirit of Jesus to steal the minds of the people and now
the devil possesses the world.

We intend to release the people from the spell and introduce them to sanity.

We are not religious but walk in of Jesus


“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception

The “Connect to Jesus Direct” web site was created as a result of an exhaustive 3 year
investigation by the “Charter Democracy Force” http://groups.google.com/group/charter-
democracy-force

The evidence irrefutably proves the powers that be of State and Church are responsible for reality and
ultimately the struggle of humankind.

They are well educated professional charlatans traditionally unscrupulous possessed of the spirit of the
Devil, the archenemy of God, hence ours and ask the people to join us in our initiative to eradicate
immoral inclination from the face of the earth commencing with the powers that be who will be the powers
that were once we are organized united.

The “Connect to Jesus Direct” group was founded in Canada in of Jesus


consistent with the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution providing a congenial environment to
commence our spiritual war on the evil spirits of the powers that be of State and Church.

First Canada then the World

Our success in Canada in “The Spirit” will be instrumental to the success of the populace of the world
conducive to peace on earth as it is in heaven whereas there are 6.6 billion people of unique perception
where we all began our lives similarly with empty mind influenced by the environment reared where the
powers that be of State and Church have traditionally played leading roles from generation to generation,
parents and guardians to their children where formal education and experience brings them up to date
consistent to the persistent befuddlement they intentionally instigated attentive to their personal need to
satiate themselves with wealth and power.

We are all humans requiring the same necessities of life, similarly vulnerable to illness, harm and the
ravages of time and if not for the powers that be of State and Church would be similar in culture, customs
and religious beliefs with sense in common to communicate with common sense for common purpose..

292
If the powers that be of State and Church were who they would have us believe they are they would be of
in and with “The Spirit”
Ignorance has been our albatross

Three Steps to the Threshold of Legal Sanity

1. Know the truth in The Spirit for legitimate purpose.


2. Think and reason with the truth in The Spirit for legitimate purpose
3. Act in The Spirit for legitimate purpose

God

Today knowledge is readily available in cyber space for all to see yet most will not bother and those that
do will be presented chance for argument by them of pertinent knowledge where career scholars
demonstrate enthusiasm and authority, the naive reader shows interest but no matter ones purpose to know
the truth of God they will never know until they talk to God face to face at the end of their days of reality.

The extraordinary masses of people with unique perceptions have chosen different careers than attempting
to find out who and what God is all about and thank God for that for surely we were not born to earth to
waste a life time trying to figure out that which we will know for sure when we meet Him at the end of our
allotted time.

If He exists and wanted us to know He would tell us, as He would have told us what to do with our lives
but He has left that up to us providing us with an extraordinary brain to do with as we will where sanity is
presumed but far from guaranteed as reality attests.

We are provided with a conscience for obvious purpose to know the difference between good and evil but
He has left our minds empty and fresh at birth unencumbered with His knowledge and adeptness to reason
for what seems to me to venture into that which is even unknown by He.

Who knows how long He has existed or if He ever did but on the presumption He does and with our
limited knowledge of the times presuming we are all created in His image could extrapolate that to mean
our brains have the same properties as His capable of bringing visages to reality where everything and
anything is possible limited only by our adeptness to vision and our desire and need to do so.

I have reasoned with my limited knowledge that the entire universe is a creation of superior beings alien to
us due our obvious ignorance akin to fish in a bowl where the earth’s hemisphere is the extremities and
earth its center core providing all that we need to survive on as we go about our purpose yet to be defined
by ourselves.

It can be reasoned that we are clones of these aliens who have chanced upon an obstacle inherent to the
human mind where their progression into the unknown has been severely compromised by their inability to
vision beyond a scope within their realm of imagination due the obstructed detriments of routine and habit
invariably leading to closed mind akin to writers block.

Who knows where any trail leads until you follow it to the end and how many forks in the road and
different paths to take and how many end up in the same place.

293
How many diversions and how many errors in judgment searching down one path to find a certain thing
not to be found discarding other knowledge not knowing what vital role it plays in the scheme of things not
yet identified.
The secret to all things is within all the knowledge that is to be had and when stored efficiently and
effectively filed easily accessed and retrievable the experienced mind honed to perfection can retrieve this
information seemingly simultaneous able to assemble whatever may be desired to achieve.

Could it not be there are too many paths and diversions from diversions to gather the knowledge necessary
to discover the infinitive number of unknowns for the aliens to seek out in their limited time to do so where
they want to achieve all that is possible during their existence for many reasons where eternal life could be
a priority which I personally find pathetically undesirable due my understanding of existence and the
reality of my life under the present ideology of the powers that be of State and Church and the limited
opportunity and efforts it would take from my perceived station in life.

It is quite possible the aliens or God had presumed if we were born innocent with empty and open minds
adept to thought and reason would grow in mind and multiply like rabbits exploring the infinite paths and
diversions into the infinitive of unknowns overestimating our adeptness to thought and reason and
underestimating our fortitude and conviction to fornication perhaps making it more desirable than they
should have as people expanded on that doing everybody every which they can as the powers that be of
State and Church led the way having the advantage the rest of us only can dream of but get by the best way
we can.

I suspect some of the UFO’s were for real, visitors from outer space who knew well to stay far away lest
the earthlings had their way with them but never the less thrilled with the excitement of danger and what
could be more enticing than flirting with the opportunity to be royally screwed by their creations.

Out of 6.6 billion there could possibly be some who could deduce my perception realistic and run with it
being coincidental to their own where perhaps they would have a logical reason to do so which I can not
perceive being of no value to me at 65 sure to expire well before I could develop anything worth while to
prolong my stay in this reality and why would I?

There has to be something in it for a human to take on any venture whether it be money or just plain fun.

One thing certain we are destined to routine and habit venturing into the unknowns at snail pace adhering
to the status quo where our destiny is fixed certain akin to that as we buried our grandparents, future
certain and accepted rather than initiating an alternate course predictable to a more promising future for all.

Truth
Truth the catalyst to all things, knowledge the constant fuel that forever replenishes itself when used with
thought and reason enough to nourish the present populace of the world and multiples to the infinitive to
explore the many paths and diversions we know exists in the unknown, where hardly could sane reason
allow any person to blow up every effort made in positive direction to the betterment of all human beings.

Certainly we must be biased to the benefit of every individual for the one allowed to fall through the cracks
could very well be ourselves.

294
We must put to use all the knowledge we have readily available to uncover the unknown, that is just as
readily available except for our inability to see it amongst all the knowledge one person can not properly
retain and manage due inattentiveness to thought and reason.

The computer has already demonstrated the advantage of having so much knowledge readily available and
all that is required is a computer and to know how to access the information, however we still require
reason to do so and thought to the initiative.
There are programs available to do a multitude of tasks eliminating the mundane of routine freeing people
to assert them selves to intended purpose where robotics introduces constant quality control freeing up the
human resources perhaps too successfully finding people out of work having not planned far enough
ahead.

Priority one must always be to the rights of the people to earn a quality life, which requires sane competent
responsible irreproachable people of fortitude and conviction to support the endeavour ensuring every
individual is competent responsible irreproachable people of fortitude and conviction to priority one.

You can not go ahead in neutral or reverse and it is futile to be geared to go forward and back at the same
time and a pathetic waste of time money and effort when neutral is already available and as much can be
accomplished by everyone staying in bed.

From observation and analysis of the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site we see
most convincingly forward reverse ideology has been firmly embedded in the legal system obviously done
for the benefit and interests of the people who embedded it for it far exceeds their authority of legitimate
purpose as they would have the people believe they are of “The Spirit” for the benefit of the people of a
moral society to the detriment of the immorally inclined being consistent with sanity as we of the moral
majority logically perceive.

Obviously people who embark on such ventures must deceive the people for they would not be so obliging
to finance the entire system, infrastructure and incurring maintenance to do so otherwise.

It is amazing though how ignorant the people have become over the years with the powers that be always
proclaiming to be in forward gear when the shift is readily apparent in reverse and progression in neutral
being absurdly pathetic for all the peoples efforts and the money taken from their unfair wages for taxes to
pay for the necessities of a moral society which are never fulfilled.

The evidence irrefutably proves the predictable inherent to humankind where each individual has a
responsibility to deal with their own conscience ensuring they invariably comply with “The Spirit enacted
into law authorizing the enforcement of “The Spirit” being the spirit of the law attested to by the verbiage
of the Charter recognizing the supremacy of God stating and implying priority one to the “The Spirit
suggesting the rule of law is the modus operandi capable of backing the guarantee to every individual as
per the provisions of the Charter ensuring every individual is responsibly compliant, but decidedly not due
the fact there is no government department or agency of competent responsible irreproachable personnel
with fortitude and conviction assigned to the task.

The evidence is overwhelming and readily available that they do take the money through taxation being
conclusive of the criminal act of fraud at the very least.

295
God

I typed in God as a URL and this site appeared amongst others where the author appears to be informed.

http://www.thetrumpet.com/s/mysteryoftheages/index.php?view=book&id=61&gclid=CKuMx8HTspMCF
R8SQQod8DCcnQ

There simply is a lot to read and one could go through the bible time after time never to prove whether
there truly is life after death or any other super natural force in play and assuredly the non scholars that
attend Church and other religious temples, buildings whatever surely do not have the wherewithal to
determine the validity of any statement made in the religious texts and should you type in the word
“religion” in the URL you can choose any link that will no doubt state religions are founded on myths and
lies adapted to the powers that be of State and Church of the country of origin.

I find it very difficult to reason any sanity into it but when I refer to the words of Confucius 2500 years ago
everything falls into place.

“There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the
words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and REALITY…finally I began to make out what was
written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE.”

History provides the predictable and yet there is no system in place to prevent the predictable and
obviously the powers that be of the legal system are the only people with the authority to do it, and
obviously when they create all these other departments, agencies and commissions and whatever like the
Ombudsman, the Civil Commission on Police Services, the Commission for Public Complaints against the
RCMP, the federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime and others under the Federal Accountability Act,
2006 such as the Commission on Ethics and Conflict of Interest they are done under public pressure and
they claim they will deal with the issues acting aghast at such things occurring, but invariably they don’t
because that would be absurd and detrimental to the success of their intended conspiracy against the
people.

Even such Committees as the Standing Committee on Public Accounts is controlled by the powers that be
who are obviously organized in the DOJ, Department of Justice who have proven their involvement with
the conspiracy and their power to intervene when evidence is linked to them as it was during the RCMP
pension plan scandal the Committee was made to sit on and the Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day
created a Task Force to cover it up while stating it would best deal with the issue.

How more obvious can the conspiracy be with published evidence published by them selves over and over
again where the taxpayer continues to pick up the tab for their obvious obstruction of justice which they
must invariably do over and over again to cover their asses.

Every department they have created with limited authority proves their intention is not to deal with
government corruption and conspiracy but is evidence of the government conspiracy where the Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada plays a major role as the advisor of all government departments
and agencies and must do so competently responsibly and irreproachably as the Guardian of the public
interest.

296
As the federal government chief legal advisor he has the responsibility to support the guarantee they made
in the provision of the Charters but according to the letter from his office dated January 22 2007 a copy of
which can be found on page 23 of the Government Correspondence compiled September 1 2007 document
it clearly states they had no intention of backing it and purportedly passed off the responsibility to the
provincial governments stating they have no authority in provincial matters being absolutely absurd for
how can they make a guarantee without having the authority to back it.

This is obviously just another attempt to deceive the people where deception is their forte and embedded as
a prominent and vital part of their MO necessary for their success and adversely assures the well being of
the people is not protected by the very people they are bound to protect by law binding upon their
acceptance of the peoples money to do so.

They clearly make the guarantee and then write themselves clear of supporting it somewhere else being
obvious to illegitimate deception often referred to as criminally fraudulent.

There is not one legitimate thing these people do, and the evidence is every where dwarfing the prodigious
amount of evidence I have provided and published on the web for all to see including the people whose e-
mail addresses in the AAAAALIST.

It is impossible for the police to not have caught on to any of this if they were competent responsible and
irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the enforcing of the Constitution in support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights consistent with the supremacy of God and common sense.

Clearly they are purposely unqualified and without authority to allow for the continued success of their
conspiracy

All their efforts are to the protection of their people in on the conspiracy costing the taxpayer an
extraordinary unfathomable amount of money ransacking them at will where the governments of all the
other countries are as least as corrupt but often humongously worse to the detriment of the populace of the
world where people are starving and dying in horrid numbers due their traditional pathetic and
unscrupulous ways allowed to occur by the RCMP on their payroll which the people pay for.

The Armed Forces have been provided the evidence and if the RCMP refuse to deal with this it is time for
the Armed Forces to move out of the countries they have invaded under the pretence of democracy and
return to overthrow the tyrannical powers that be who are ransacking their own people they purport to
protect.

This document CDFMay202008 is to be read in conjunction with the following files leading up to the
RCMP Final Letter of Disposition due May 21 2008.

CharterDemocracyForceMay92008
CDFMay132008
CDFMay152008
CDFMay192008

These documents were initiated as commentary of the documents published on the Charter Democracy
Force and the CDF documents web sites so as to aid the incompetent government personnel address the
issues of Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy against the Canadian people being

297
traditional of the unscrupulous powers that be of State and Church world wide as documented in the annals
of history.

Their ignorance is due their groomed immaculate training conducive to the conspiracy originating from the
provincial and federal Attorney Generals offices with the cooperation of the members of the Law Societies
and the Bar Associations where they have all been provide the evidence requesting they intervene on
behalf of the people and the sanctity of the Constitution.
The Original Crime June 30 2005

On June 30 2005 my former tenant committed the criminal act of fraud over $100,000 at
an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal hearing before the judicator that was recorded in
a public building financed by the taxpayer to administer and enforce the law
consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical
disability.

The 2 part document “Document Sun Editor October 8 2006” published on the “Charter
Democracy Force” web site contains the irrefutable evidence that my former tenant Don
Wilson committed the criminal act of fraud and filed false and misleading information
with the ORHT ($43,000) which is an offence under s.206 (2) of the Tenant Protection
Act,1997.

The evidence contained within this 2 part document was provided to the Tribunal and
when the judicator Nancy Fahlgren became aware of the crimes she said she had
authority to send the evidence on to the Investigation and Enforcement Unit of the
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.

This commentary was removed from the recording.

Towards the end of the first day of the hearing June 30 2005 Nancy asked for all the
evidence I had and gave it to her.
She said she would review it before the second day of hearing July 28 2005 and at the
beginning of the hearing that second day she announced there would be no recording.

On August 10 2005 I received a copy of the OHRT Order # TNL-67103 dated August 8 2005
which found for me evicting Don and ordering him to pay me $10,000 in rent arrears
which I have not yet received a penny.

There was no mention if they commenced or caused to commence proceedings so I phoned


her office to find out I could not talk to her.

I wrote but the ORHT refused to discuss it as per Lawyer File # 1

I faxed the Investigations and Enforcement Unit the evidence and they phoned me back
fairly soon after being quite abrupt about not investigating. I faxed several more
times with phone calls returned me but the ORHT refused to deal with the issues and
refused to write explaining why.

I persisted and on September 6 2006 near a month later Dave Grech finally responded
with an explanation as to why they would not investigate which was absurd and
incoherent to the evidence.

298
I wrote to explain but he refused to respond so I wrote again but decided to drive
downtown Toronto to his office and hand deliver it to Dave but he was not available
so I left the letter along with a complete set of the evidence and a copy of the
Tribunal recording but he refused to respond. See document “Dave Grech compiled
correspondence Sept 1 2007” on Charter Democracy Force web site.(See Lawyer File # 2)

So now at this time the ORHT and the Investigations and Enforcement Unit had refused
to commence or cause to commence proceedings and had acted rather strange right from
the beginning and then when the recording had the commentary by the Judicator removed
that she had the authority to send the evidence on to Investigations it became
apparent something was very wrong.

When I considered that the judicator had the evidence for near a month prior to the
second day of the hearing and she stated before the case recommenced that it would
not be recorded it became very strange.

When I wrote and provided the evidence to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and
Housing Hon. John Garretsen and he responded that he trusted Dave Grech and didn’t
see any reason to review his decision and that the ORHT was an independent agency and
he had no authority to intervene with their decision I knew for certain there was
something pathetically wrong. (See Lawyer File # 3)

His duty as Minister is to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997
and the ORHT operates under the Act so obviously he must have authority to intervene.

I wrote the Ontario Ombudsman but their response was absurd so I wrote back again and
they made some effort but absolutely ridiculous demonstrating they did not have the
slightest idea how to investigate and did not look at the evidence. See “Ombudsman”
document on aforementioned web site. (Also see Lawyer File # 4)

Since then I wrote many other government departments including the personnel in the
remainder of the 15 Lawyer Files but none would respond to the evidence.

The 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document, which dealt with an entirely
different matter irrefutably proves they do not give a damn about evidence when it
comes to complaints against their members and they do not give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web
site clearly states the Attorney General is responsible to advise all the government
departments and agencies which links him to all these people referenced in Lawyer
Files 1-4 which convincingly looks like he has been behind all the weird behavior of
these government personnel.

Page 10 was copied from the Ontario web site (Page 12 of the “Government
Correspondence compiled Sept 1 2007) clearly stating the Ombudsman job is to
investigate complaints about government organizations where you would presume they
had some idea as to how to go about an investigation but apparently they were taught
by the Law Society.

The aforementioned “Ombudsman” document clearly states their authority is seriously


limited not at all what the government would have us believe but then again the
evidence shows they can not be trusted or believed at all.

Clearly the Attorney General advises the Minister Hon. John Garretsen and clearly in
such serious matters Dave Grech would have consulted with Minister Hon. John
Garretsen making it look a whole lot like the Attorney General was behind the
ridiculous actions of Dave Grech coordinator and Hon John Garretsen.

299
The Attorney General can easily be connected to the ORHT, Investigations, Minister
Hon. John Garretsen and the Ombudsman and certainly someone with authority has
orchestrated the entire obstruction of justice and all their absurdity.

This is all covered in the “Mad Glad Sad…Why?” document on the Charter Democracy
Force web site and other sites referenced there on.

Obviously they have no intention of supporting the individual’s guaranteed Charter


rights and the members of the Law Society are making a mockery of the Constitution
where justice is impossible as their only interest is for money.

A PUBLIC INQUIRY is most seriously warranted.

For the record I have copied pages 10- 16 from Lawyer File # 11 to pages 11-16 which
irrefutably prove my former tenant Don Wilson is a fraud as he provided me a
fraudulent business prospectus as you will read.

This evidence has been provided to all the government personnel on the AAAALIST and
the York Regional Police but he still walks the streets and obvious danger to the
public.

The entire system is designed for the benefit of the members of the Law Society who
do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, the public
interest, which the Attorney General is Guardian.

The system is absolutely pathetic and obviously illegitimate and must be restructured
to be competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and
conviction to the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and the only
way the system can be made responsible is to have an independent autonomous agency
watching every move they make.

Frank Gallagher

300
301
May 22 2008

To: AAAAALIST
Web site: cdf.name
Particular attention

Mary Dawson
Commissioner Ethics and Conflict
of Interest

Louis Theoret
Federal Ombudsman Victims of
Crime

Bob MacAdam
RCMP Staff Sergeant

Sgt. Randy Craig The Charter Democracy Force is pleased to announce the opening of
OPP Anti-Rackets their new web site, perhaps a little more professional attentive to getting
the message across of the Government Organized Crime of corruption
Bruce Herridge
Deputy Chief and conspiracy keeping in tradition with the Attorney Generals of the
York Region Police Federal and Provincial Governments.
Fax: 905-853-5810

Andree Leduc
Commission for Public Complaints
Against the RCMP
Fax: 604-501-4095

No doubt you are all anxiously awaiting the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition due May 21 2008, which I
suspect will arrive in the mail tomorrow dated May 21 2008.

The report will be published on the Charter Democracy web site cdf.name (Just type in cdf.name)
After opening the site, click on the Evidence button and scroll to the bottom of the page where you will
find a link to the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition.

As you are aware the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition will be conclusive of the government organized
crime as they site so and so section of the RCMP Act and on like that concluding with section so and so,
which provides them opportunity to close the file.

Perhaps they will use the word “Threshold” as did Bruce Herridge of the YRP and Randy Craig OPP

At the top of the Evidence page is a link to the Charter Democracy Force web site that was provided to
RCMP Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam who has been assigned the case from the RCMP Commissioner’s
office.

Near the bottom of the web page there are links to 5 documents recently sent to all the people on the
AAAAALIST which includes RCMP Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam.

CharterDemocracyForceMay92008
CDFMay132008
CDFMay152008

302
CDFMay192008
CDFMay202008

Within these documents I have requested once again as to the meaning of the word “Threshold” in terms as
to how the evidence I provided the YRP did not meet the requirements to surpass the invisible line in order
to proceed to the provincial court.
Once again I request a response to the term “Threshold” relative to the evidence I have provided.

These answers were requested and expected in the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition but it is predictable
they will not be answered for invariably the answers would be indicative of the Ontario Government
Organized Crime, which they are determined to cover up.

Throughout the documents published as evidence on the Charter Democracy Force there is a document
“Mad Glad mostly Sad…..Why?” asking many questions I have not yet had response to.

I request them answered now especially by YRP Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge, Police Chief Armand
LaBarge and I request Sgt. Randy Craig of the OPP Anti-Rackets to also respond or forward it onto the
office of the OPP Commissioner to respond..

Randy Craig:

Please let me know if you decided to forward it on to the Commissioner.

RCMP Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam

On the outside chance you did respond to the questions by all means, and I am certain you will, ignore this
request of you.

Andree Leduc
Commissioner for Public
Complaints Against the RCMP

Re: Files # PC-2007-2316 and 7

You have not yet responded to my e-mail of December 27 2007 and others published on the Charter
Democracy Force web site or my faxes dated January 2, 4 and 17 2008.

You had complained of your incompetence to deal with such a serious matter and I have made every effort
to make you competent or at least get prepared for my non acceptance of the predictable RCMP
Commissioner’s office attempt to cover up the conspiracy, so considering the serious nature of the
complaint and having not received the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition and aware the RCMP had already
reviewed the evidence prior to my filing a complaint and not responded and the same with the RCMP
Commissioner who had been provided the evidence and on the reasonable presumption the RCMP had
originally declined my request for an investigation on the instructions of the RCMP Commissioner and
since there is no evidence charges have been laid with respect to the evidence it a reasonable conclusion
the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition will be consistent with the conspiracy.

303
Confident the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition will not be satisfactory I hereby request you to respond as
to whether or not you will cooperate and accept my request for a review.

I have forwarded this new web site in case you have not taken the opportunity to study the evidence and
the commentary I have forwarded you in an attempt to make you competent.

Perhaps this new site will be easier for you to follow and I suggest you do a power cram course to that
endeavor.

I reiterate that not one of the government departments or agencies are up to the challenge where a PUBLIC
INQUIRY is warranted and to that endeavor you certainly have the responsibility to study the evidence to
a reasonable understanding where at that point you will be alert to the necessity of a public Inquiry.

Meanwhile unless you are coherent to the evidence there is no way you can possibly judge as to be
satisfied with the RCMP report which you are required to determine.

However failure to do so would be consistent with the reports I have received from government personnel
that were either incoherent to the evidence or the reports indicated the evidence wasn’t even studied
consistent with the correspondence from the Law Society of Upper Canada whose members do not give a
damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and adamantly state evidence is irrelevant when
addressing complaints against their members.

I address your sanity competence and adeptness to common sense when you review the evidence to
determine if you are satisfied with the RCMP’s report.

Your decision relative to the facts will also be published adding one more Commission to be expunged
from the taxpayer’s inane burdens.

Enough time has been wasted and it will go pretty quick from here.

Your response is warranted and should I have to send my complaint via Canada Post Registered mail, due
to your ignorance and non cooperative attitude not providing me the same opportunity as provided to every
other individual by e-mail available on your web site or the e-mail address on your brochure
complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca I would suggest you have obstructed justice and stepped all over my equality
Charter rights and have harassed me in my efforts to get the justice you were mandated to provide.

I leave you with that to immediately respond as to your intentions and request you follow the instructions
to see a copy of the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition to determine if you are satisfied with it.

I and the people expect competent responsible irreproachable government personnel with fortitude and
conviction to their wellbeing consistent with the Constitution conducive to the support of the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights.

Frank Gallagher
Charter Democracy Force

304
March 30 2008 Modified May 30 2008?

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of Crime Section
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sergeant Roy Steinebach


roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca www.cdf.name

Frank Gallagher
Milton Detachment
Inspector Brian Verheul
brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Investigation of refusing to investigate


URGENT
Government Organized Crime
Corruption and conspiracy
Your File 2007-1355445

Dear Bob, Roy and Brian

There is no way the governments can cover their asses now and the whole world is involved so perhaps
they will understand now.

I have handed you the irrefutable evidence, quite obvious of the traditional unscrupulous ways of the
powers that be of State and Church in persistent pursuit of wealth and power catering to the affluent and
influential scratching each others back so to speak in the inherent two tiered system as they conspire
against the people of the Lower Tiers manipulating the market having the obvious opportunity left
unchecked.

I have stated the evidence is every where in reality to see for those who will see.

It has been all over the media and visible at the gas pumps and at the grocery stores.

I write to you because you know the RCMP Commissioner being a Deputy Minister under the Minister of
Public Safety Stockwell Day appointed by the Prime Minister Stephen Harper who appointed the Minister
of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is in on the conspiracy along with the others mentioned as the
evidence referenced on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name irrefutably proves and you
have had cause to study it and should be up to speed.

There no longer is time for you to dilly dally around as the people of the Lower Tier, the moral majority
are in clear and present danger under assault as I write and when you open the link below you will read as
a direct result of illegal actions taken and being taken by the powerful corporations here and around the
world with the cooperation of the powers that be of State and Church have caused or allowed to happen the

305
murdering of innocent people through starvation as a direct result of their unscrupulous ways as the people
of the Lower Tier in Canada owe heavily to the banks, choked by increasing utility and heating costs with
their pocket money being scooped at the gas pumps with rising food costs soon to accelerate as food vital
to their survival comes scarce only to be available to the people of the Upper Tier who can afford it, it is
far more than circumstantial evidence given all that the prodigious amount of evidence I have provided
you proves.

You have more than reasonable cause to act on behalf of the people to pit a halt to the atrocity without a
warrant because there is no legitimate person to give you one being the enemy of the people which can not
be more obvious than now and we the people of the Lower Tier do not care to wait for you to deal with the
symptoms whereas we demand you get to the root of the problem before our demise.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms demands you support every individuals guaranteed Charter
rights where every individual has the right to equal protection and benefits before and under the law where
priority is to deterrence attentive to the predictable being preventable where the ideal is to protect us prior
to be victimized because we see no way justice can be served after we are dead and we would prefer to see
it while we are alive and well in this life.

The government are fully aware what is happening and they have purported to look into the oil situation
and claim there is nothing they can do.

Obviously they will claim the same for the food situation just as obvious as they have created or allowed
the situation to happen.

People have been starving to death for years as they stood by claiming they were concerned and doing
everything they can do while they were in on the scheme to cause the very thing they purport they couldn’t
find a way to deal with.

Strange they are the powers that be only when they want to be.

Your duty is clear.

The truth must get to the people so they can be prepared to spank their kids in the Armed Forces if they
will not stop behaving like kids and grasp hold of reality.

We need them home here to straighten things out and when we have tidied up here we will direct them at
our true enemy’s world wide giving them something worthwhile to die for.

If they do it right standing with the people it is a concept that could spread world wide.

http://groups.google.com/group/venomous-snakes-spiders-powers-that-be-of-state-and-church-

Frank Gallagher

PS

Test your skills by first tracking down the interpreter.

306
June 23 2008

After May 5 2008

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


Royal Canadian Mounted Police
NCO i/c Occupational Health & Safety Services “O” Division /
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6 Frank Gallagher
905-953-7580 Manager
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca CDF
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On.
Prior to May 5 2008 L4P 2P8

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt


Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of
Crime Section
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Your File

Dear Bob

April 21 2008 interim report (copy attached)

You state in your interim report you are presently reviewing the relevant material and will be finalizing
your investigation in the coming days and I will be apprised of the result of this investigation by way of a
Final Letter of Disposition within 30 days.

May 20 2008 interim report (copy attached)

1) You state the Final Letter of Disposition should be on its way within days.
2) You intended to have the report done and forwarded through channels before now but circumstances
arose and you were unable to complete the task as hoped.
3) You were transferred to a new job on May 5 2008
4) You went on to explain that you were away from May 10th – 19th
5) As well, it has taken you a bit longer to analyze all of the documentation than you had anticipated.
6) Rather than rush the job to get the report done before you went away you felt it was important to be
thorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence.
7) The delay is regretted but be assured that your report will be completed this week and the Final Letter of
Disposition will follow shortly thereafter.

307
Due the particular circumstance where the evidence implicates the RCMP Commissioner and you were
assigned to investigate my complaint of Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy you
can see the events as you described them being somewhat convincing of the conspiracy as was predictable

Can you spot what I mean?

Given the seriousness of the charge with the entire Government being Organized Crime personified of
corruption and conspiracy against the individuals of the Lower Tiers as the evidence irrefutably proves one
would expect a person competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the
support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights would have been aghast upon reading the evidence
on the Charter Democracy Force web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force.

With concern for the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights one would have realized there
was a serious problem and dropped everything to the resolve. .

Of course that is just how a person of the Lower Tier would see it.

Being a person of the Lower Tier having first hand knowledge of what the evidence irrefutably proves that
the entire Government including the RCMP upper echelon are Government Organized Crime personified
of corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s of the Lower Tier knowing the entire legal system
personnel did not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as the evidence consistently
shows being consistent with the 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document where the Society
adamantly states or implies their members are not required to give a damn about the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights it was inevitable that an investigation by the RCMP, who had been provided the
evidence since January 2006 and had refused to investigate the Government Organized Crime personified
of corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s of the Lower Tier where it was apparent such a
charge would be consulted with the RCMP Commissioner who had also been provided the evidence,
would find that there is no credence to the charge of Government Organized Crime personified of
corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s of the Lower Tier.

The evidence clearly shows there is not one department or agency for an individual to complain to even
though the governments have created many Commissions and purportedly independent agencies such as
the Ombudsman presenting them as representatives of the people the evidence consistently shows there is
no such thing as a government department or agency competent responsible irreproachable of fortitude and
conviction to the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

The evidence I had provided the prominent government personnel on the AAAAALIST was obvious of
the deliberate incompetence of the entire Government Organized Crime personified of corruption and
conspiracy against the individual’s of the Lower Tier and their acceptance of that which the evidence
irrefutably proves is convincing they see nothing wrong with the system that refuses to support the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
So what I had gone to all the trouble to prove to them they already knew and were quite happy with it and I
suppose quite proud that they had structured a fool proof system that was deliberately incompetent
irresponsible reproachable that they could administer and enforce with fortitude and conviction and yet in
no way support every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

After all if they were going to be a successful government of deception and prevarication it would be
unacceptable to be caught doing it and to ensure it and I have to admit there is no way through the entire
legal system for an individual to get the support as guaranteed by the Charter.

308
Of course I have known that for quite a while as I have also known I had to be able to present the evidence
to the people of the Lower Tier in such a manner even the most naïve could comprehend being somewhat
of a challenge even though the Government Organized Crime personified of corruption and conspiracy
against the individual’s of the Lower Tier is so pathetically obvious.

The inherent problem as you know which I have written on so many times is the people are born into the
conspiracy with it already up and running as it has been going on for well over 2500 years as I have
mentioned a few times about Confucius where the struggle of the people of the Lower Tiers has persisted
due the unscrupulous powers that be of State and Church (Religious leaders) who have traditionally
ransacked the people of the Lower Tiers using them every which they can to feed their insatiable lust for
power and wealth where the money taken from them is used to finance police to protect them from the
people who even finance their Armed Forces to invade other countries to instill their ways on them.

The people have never organized for the right purpose as it has always been one wannabe power that be
assemble forces of the people of the Lower Tiers to fight the incumbent power that be using the people of
the Lower Tiers where invariably all wannabe power that be are unscrupulous of deception and
prevarication interested in satiating their greed with power and wealth.

Nothing changes with a two tier system and the people of the Lower Tiers pitted against each other by
people of the Upper Tiers with the affluent and influential choosing sides with the upstarts or the
incumbent and life goes on with the people of the Lower Tier always at the wrong end of the stick.

The people have always needed a for real Robin Hood but all they have ever had is for real Robbing
Hoods.

Well the Charter Democracy Force has arrived although we have no intent of violence or robbing the rich
to give to the poor the outcome will be decidedly better eliminating two transactions one being a necessity
as the people will rise to hold onto their money with no one to take it from them and thus saving the efforts
of Robin Hood to get it back for them.

All the people need to do is stand together against the tyrannical forces that will have no force at all once
they refuse to support them.

When the people know the truth, which you have all provided and I have published on the web site the
success of the governments founded on deceit and prevarication will collapse no longer being able to
deceive the people.

Necessary for the success of the people is truth and trust which we are pleased to provide them with no
ulterior purpose because we are not in it for money which seriously befuddles the situation as you have
demonstrated very well accepting a promotion to NCO where perhaps you had your final report done prior
to your starting your new job May 5 2008 (Promotion) as you informed me in your interim report of April
21 2008 that I would have the Final Letter of Disposition within thirty days.

In your May 20 2008 interim report 2) above: You intended to have the report done and forwarded through
channels before now but circumstances arose and you were unable to complete the task as hoped.

309
That infers some of the 30 days would be used forwarding through channels which of course due the
seriousness of the charges and circumstances a competent responsible irreproachable report never had a
chance going through anyway so either one of two things probably occurred.

It would be reasonable to suspect the upper echelon have been discussing this with you all the way and due
the fact the evidence was so convincing and in fact conclusive when addressed in “The Spirit” of the
Constitution as it should, being the supreme law of Canada that recognizes the supremacy of God you had
an onerous and formidable challenge to come with a report that looked reasonable and would deceive the
people as there was no one in the legal system you had to deceive because they are all in on it.
So it is not too far of a stretch you did a reasonable job and they were pleased giving you the promotion
which I suggested just may happen in my early writings where I have published the events on the original
Charter Democracy Force web sight http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force under the
heading Royal Canadian Mounted Police..

In fact throughout the documents published there you will see the eventuality predicted as it was obviously
predictable of an investigation of Government Organized Crime carried out by themselves.

You have to admit the charges are serious enough for them to have picked the right person for the job and
nothing like a little incentive like the promise of a promotion if you did a good job.
Perhaps they even gave you a bonus and sent you on a vacation May 10th – 19th

One thing for sure is their hearts were not in to exposing themselves and they sure did not go about the
investigation as if they were aghast that such a thing could happen as Government Organized Crime under
the watch of the RCMP.

I recall at the beginning being quite concerned that you were just doing this investigation between other
jobs as you stated you were not putting full time on it.

I am sure you will read in the documents under Royal Canadian Mounted Police that I complained about
that at the beginning of your investigation.
Every that has occurred was all predictable as the evidence showed so of course I was not surprised when
they occurred but I had to have it all documented and even give you people the opportunity to explain
differently along the way, but how could you when there is no valid explanation that would suffice due the
circumstances when the evidence clearly stands for itself.

So anyway there is no evidence the seriousness of the issues were addressed in any sense of urgency and of
course your latest interim report of June 20 2008 (Copy attached) clearly states you have busy on other
projects and have dealing with the matter of Government Organized Crime on your own time making it
quite clear you have not had your heart in it in “The Spirit” and probably who ever gave you the promotion
told you just to finish up your report when you had a moment and you wanted to get it out of the way to
enjoy your new position so you thought you would deal with it on your own time.

All understandable, being consistent with the conspiracy.

After all if it ever was intended to deal with it in competent responsible irreproachable manner months ago
you people would have been down inquiring into the matters referenced in the Lawyer Files 1-4 to see if
the Attorney General or his agents had advised those people to act so stupid and incoherently and due the
seriousness of the issues it is obvious they would have consulted with the Attorney General or his agents as

310
the Attorney General is their chief legal advisor and is his responsibility to do so as clearly stated in the
“Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published by the Ontario Government.

So legally he was responsible to advise them but illegally incompetent he did as the evidence irrefutably
shows and all you had to do was confirm who it was that advised them adverse to their responsibility in
support of the individuals guaranteed Charter rights.

Any claims you or anyone else does not have the authority to deal with such matters only goes to the fact
the Attorney General who is Guardian of the public interest as clearly stated in the “Roles and
Responsibilities of the Attorney General” proves only one thing that he is incompetent to advise the
government personnel in support of their guaranteed Charter rights and of course that is an understatement
as the evidence throughout clearly shows he or the federal government never intended to support the
individual’s guaranteed rights and they have demonstrated that to be fact and well documente as not one
government person lifted a finger in that direction and those who were required to report clearly indicated
their deliberate incompetence to do it.
There is one other way it could have went down and that is you wanted to do the right thing from the
beginning and of course that is illogical because they would have never assigned you the task in the
beginning unless of course they thought you were too dumb to pick up on the conspiracy as you were
particularly good at saluting, snapping your heels together and following their laws policies and procedures
conducive to the success of their conspiracy knowing you would not be coherent to “The Spirit” being
irrelevant as you check off your adherence to their prescribed M.O.

Dogs get biscuits to roll over and you get to give them the four finger wave with thumb to your nose, as
you get a promotion and all expenses paid 10 day holiday.

Anyway things are going down as expected and obviously had to if you wanted to keep your job and
pension which is so coveted by all government people and envied by the people of the Lower Tier who
attempt to do it the hard way, the honest legitimate way in “The Spirit”

The Church has set them up very well making them easy pickings, eh

Well all that remains is the Final Letter of Disposition which will be quite a laugh I am sure and so obvious
to the people who are waiting to see it who have actually taken the time to comprehend the evidence.

You guys are just as good covering up as you are at supporting the individual’s guarantee, but of course
you can not help it, you are the unscrupulous powers that be of State and Church

When the Final Letter of Disposition comes out Scorpions will be revered for their unpretentious traits.

One other thought just occurred to me, ha ha ha….I get it…..damn you are good Bob.

You played them for the fools that they are and as you know through studying the evidence they had to
make a move to stop to you, and although we all suspect that leverage is the name of the game you wanted
to document it because after all it would be mere speculation ha ha ha Right Bob if you turned on them and
told the truth how it went down if you did not have a promotion to prove obvious to their bribe.

Well damn, I am sorry Bob, not to have given it more thought, but after all Bob the evidence is so
irrefutable that you would not turn, after all it has gone on successfully for at least 2500 years.

311
Thanks to you the suffering of the masses will soon be over.

On the outside chance you are really in on the conspiracy I hope you really appreciate your new promotion
and the people will be well aware of what value you put on their lives and I am of the opinion they will not
be too pleased if they find out.

I and we of the Charter Democracy Force are so anxious as to the final out come we are reviewing our
M.O. to see if we can not expedite matters.

We appreciate your efforts to keep us informed and as you see we are well informed, Right?

If we do not have it right pleas advise immediately.

If you are on our side then we understand why it would not be prudent at this time and will await until we
are in possession of the Final Letter of Disposition from the RCMP Commissioner, Deputy Minister
immediately under the Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day, who believes he got away with covering
up the DOJ involvement with the RCMP pension fund scandal and the Government Organized Crime with
the same old ploy used 2500 years ago..
No doubt you will have a lot to offer when the people come to you first to find out what it is all about.

Of couse they could do it the hard way and actually study the evidence to coherency and would know the
truth but then would not know what to do with it due to unfamiliarity.

Why would they? After all the government personnel are paid to and they do not bother and they get paid
so much better and even more if they are willing to let millions of people suffer the consequences.

At first I was thinking the value they place on human life was very minute before I pondered further
realizing the entire government, police, Armed Forces are all paid off to turn their heads the other way.

To make it even more pathetic they are paid off with the people’s money who are not aware they are
paying for their own demise.

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception

312
313
August 18 2008

RCMP Commissioner
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Pierre Leduc
Executive Assisstant to the Commissioner
pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


www.cdf.name
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of Crime Section Frank Gallagher
345 Harry Walker Parkway South Keswick, On
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6 frank@cdf.name
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sergeant Roy Steinebach


roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Regular Forces

Sergeant Karen Delorey


Non Commissioned Officer in Charge
Professional Standards Unit
255 Attwell Drive

Milton Detachment
Inspector Brian Verheul
Regular Forces
brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Investigation of refusing to investigate


Government Organized Crime
Corruption and conspiracy
Your File 2007-1355445

New request for investigation of Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s
of the Lower Tier

In addition to the evidence previously provided you under Your File 2007-1355445 and evidence published on the
Charter Democracy Force web sites www.cdf.name and 10 affiliate sites accessible through the www.cdf.name site I
provide you the following evidence published on the CanLaw Lawyer referral site which attests to the fact the entire
legal system is incompetently corrupt incapable of administering and enforcing law consistent with the Constitution
conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

I have mentioned evidence is available everywhere in reality if you have a mind to do it.
You will find plenty of informative information on the http://www.canlaw.com web site

314
315
June 25 2008

After May 5 2008

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


Royal Canadian Mounted Police
NCO i/c Occupational Health & Safety Services “O” Division /
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6 Frank Gallagher
905-953-7580 Manager
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca CDF
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On.
Prior to May 5 2008 L4P 2P8

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt


Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of
Crime Section
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Your File

Dear Bob

April 21 2008 interim report (copy attached)

You state in your interim report you are presently reviewing the relevant material and will be finalizing
your investigation in the coming days and I will be apprised of the result of this investigation by way of a
Final Letter of Disposition within 30 days.

May 20 2008 interim report (copy attached)

1) You state the Final Letter of Disposition should be on its way within days.
2) You intended to have the report done and forwarded through channels before now but circumstances
arose and you were unable to complete the task as hoped.
3) You were transferred to a new job on May 5 2008
4) You went on to explain that you were away from May 10th – 19th
5) As well, it has taken you a bit longer to analyze all of the documentation than you had anticipated.
6) Rather than rush the job to get the report done before you went away you felt it was important to be
thorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence.
7) The delay is regretted but be assured that your report will be completed this week and the Final Letter of
Disposition will follow shortly thereafter.

316
Due the particular circumstance where the evidence implicates the RCMP Commissioner and you were
assigned to investigate my complaint of Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy you
can see the events as you described them being somewhat convincing of the conspiracy as was predictable

Can you spot what I mean?

Given the seriousness of the charge with the entire Government being Organized Crime personified of
corruption and conspiracy against the individuals of the Lower Tiers as the evidence irrefutably proves one
would expect a person competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the
support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights would have been aghast upon reading the evidence
on the Charter Democracy Force web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force.

With concern for the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights one would have realized there
was a serious problem and dropped everything to the resolve. .

Of course that is just how a person of the Lower Tier would see it.

Being a person of the Lower Tier having first hand knowledge of what the evidence irrefutably proves that
the entire Government including the RCMP upper echelon are Government Organized Crime personified
of corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s of the Lower Tier knowing the entire legal system
personnel did not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as the evidence consistently
shows being consistent with the 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document where the Society
adamantly states or implies their members are not required to give a damn about the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights it was inevitable that an investigation by the RCMP, who had been provided the
evidence since January 2006 and had refused to investigate the Government Organized Crime personified
of corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s of the Lower Tier where it was apparent such a
charge would be consulted with the RCMP Commissioner who had also been provided the evidence,
would find that there is no credence to the charge of Government Organized Crime personified of
corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s of the Lower Tier.

The evidence clearly shows there is not one department or agency for an individual to complain to even
though the governments have created many Commissions such as the Commission for Public Complaints
against the RCMP and purportedly independent agencies such as the Ombudsman presenting them as
representatives of the people, the evidence consistently shows there is no such thing as a government
department or agency competent responsible irreproachable of fortitude and conviction to the support of
the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

The evidence I had provided the prominent government personnel on the AAAAALIST was obvious of
the deliberate incompetence of the entire Government Organized Crime personified of corruption and
conspiracy against the individual’s of the Lower Tier and their acceptance of that which the evidence
irrefutably proves is convincing they see nothing wrong with the system that refuses to support the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
So what I had gone to all the trouble to prove to them they already knew and were quite happy with it and I
suppose quite proud that they had structured a fool proof system that was deliberately incompetent
irresponsible and reproachable that they could administer and enforce with fortitude and conviction and yet
in no way support every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

317
After all if they were going to be a successful government of deception and prevarication it would be
unacceptable to be caught doing it and to ensure it and I have to admit there is no way through the entire
legal system for an individual to get the support as guaranteed by the Charter.

Of course I have known that for quite a while as I have also known I had to be able to present the evidence
to the people of the Lower Tier in such a manner even the most naïve could comprehend being somewhat
of a challenge even though the Government Organized Crime personified of corruption and conspiracy
against the individual’s of the Lower Tier is so pathetically obvious.

The inherent problem as you know which I have written on so many times is the people are born into the
conspiracy with it already up and running as it has been going on for well over 2500 years as I have
mentioned a few times about Confucius where the struggle of the people of the Lower Tiers has persisted
due the unscrupulous powers that be of State and Church (Religious leaders) who have traditionally
ransacked the people of the Lower Tiers using them every which they can to feed their insatiable lust for
power and wealth where the money taken from them is used to finance police to protect them from the
people who even finance their Armed Forces to invade other countries to instil their ways on them.

The people have never organized for the right purpose as it has always been one wannabe power that be
who assemble forces of the people of the Lower Tiers to fight the incumbent power that be using the
people of the Lower Tiers where invariably all wannabe power that be are unscrupulous of deception and
prevarication interested in satiating their greed with power and wealth.

Nothing changes with a two tier system and the people of the Lower Tiers pitted against each other by
people of the Upper Tiers with the affluent and influential choosing sides with the upstarts or the
incumbent and life goes on with the people of the Lower Tier always at the wrong end of the stick.

The people have always needed a for real Robin Hood but all they have ever had is for real Robbing
Hoods.

Well the Charter Democracy Force has arrived although we have no intent of violence or robbing the rich
to give to the poor the outcome will be decidedly better eliminating two transactions one being a necessity
as the people will rise to hold onto their money with no one to take it from them and thus saving the efforts
of Robin Hood to get it back for them.

All the people need to do is stand together against the tyrannical forces that will have no force at all once
they refuse to support them.

When the people know the truth, which you have all provided and I have published on the web site the
success of the governments founded on deceit and prevarication will collapse no longer being able to
deceive the people.

Necessary for the success of the people is truth and trust which we are pleased to provide them with no
ulterior purpose because we are not in it for money which seriously befuddles the situation as you have
demonstrated very well accepting a promotion to NCO where perhaps you had your final report done prior
to your starting your new job May 5 2008 (Promotion) as you informed me in your interim report of April
21 2008 that I would have the Final Letter of Disposition within thirty days.

In your May 20 2008 interim report 2) above: You intended to have the report done and forwarded through
channels before now but circumstances arose and you were unable to complete the task as hoped.

318
That infers some of the 30 days would be used forwarding through channels which of course due the
seriousness of the charges and circumstances a competent responsible irreproachable report never had a
chance going through anyway so either one of two things probably occurred.

It would be reasonable to suspect the upper echelon have been discussing this with you all the way and due
the fact the evidence was so convincing and in fact conclusive when addressed in “The Spirit” of the
Constitution as it should, being the supreme law of Canada that recognizes the supremacy of God you had
an onerous and formidable challenge to come up with a report that looked reasonable and would deceive
the people as there was no one in the legal system you had to deceive because they are all in on it.
So it is not too far of a stretch you did a reasonable job and they were pleased giving you the promotion
which I suggested just may happen in my early writings where I have published the events on the original
Charter Democracy Force web sight http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force under the
heading Royal Canadian Mounted Police..

In fact throughout the documents published there you will see the eventuality predicted as it was obviously
predictable of an investigation of Government Organized Crime carried out by themselves.

You have to admit the charges are serious enough for them to have picked the right person for the job and
nothing like a little incentive like the promise of a promotion if you did a good job.
Perhaps they even gave you a bonus and sent you on a vacation May 10th – 19th

One thing for sure is their hearts were not in to exposing themselves and they sure did not go about the
investigation as if they were aghast that such a thing could happen as Government Organized Crime under
the watch of the RCMP.

I recall at the beginning being quite concerned that you were just doing this investigation between other
jobs as you stated you were not putting full time on it.

I am sure you will read in the documents under Royal Canadian Mounted Police that I complained about
that at the beginning of your investigation.
Everything that has occurred was all predictable as the evidence showed so of course I was not surprised
when they occurred but I had to have it all documented and even give you people the opportunity to
explain differently along the way, but how could you when there is no valid explanation that would suffice
due the circumstances when the evidence clearly stands for itself.

So anyway there is no evidence the seriousness of the issues were addressed in any sense of urgency and of
course your latest interim report of June 20 2008 (Copy attached) clearly states you have been busy on
other projects and have been dealing with the matter of Government Organized Crime on your own time
making it quite clear you have not had your heart in it in “The Spirit” and probably who ever gave you the
promotion told you just to finish up your report when you had a moment and you wanted to get it out of
the way to enjoy your new position so you thought you would deal with it on your own time.

All understandable, being consistent with the conspiracy.

After all if it ever was intended to deal with it in competent responsible irreproachable manner months ago
you people would have been down inquiring into the matters referenced in the Lawyer Files 1-4 to see if
the Attorney General or his agents had advised those people to act so stupid and incoherently and due the
seriousness of the issues it is obvious they would have consulted with the Attorney General or his agents as

319
the Attorney General is their chief legal advisor and is his responsibility to do so as clearly stated in the
“Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published by the Ontario Government.

So legally he was responsible to advise them but illegally incompetent he did as the evidence irrefutably
shows and all you had to do was confirm who it was that advised them adverse to their responsibility in
support of the individuals guaranteed Charter rights.

Any claims you or anyone else does not have the authority to deal with such matters only goes to the fact
the Attorney General, who is Guardian of the public interest as clearly stated in the “Roles and
Responsibilities of the Attorney General” has irrefutably proven that he is incompetent to advise the
government personnel in support of their guaranteed Charter rights and of course that is an understatement
as the evidence throughout clearly shows he nor the federal government intended to support the
individual’s guaranteed rights and they have demonstrated that to be fact and well documented as not one
government person lifted a finger in that direction and those who were required to report clearly indicated
their deliberate incompetence to do it.
There is one other way it could have went down and that is you wanted to do the right thing from the
beginning and of course that is illogical because they would have never assigned you the task in the
beginning unless of course they thought you were too dumb to pick up on the conspiracy as you were
particularly good at saluting, snapping your heels together and following their laws policies and procedures
conducive to the success of their conspiracy knowing you would not be coherent to “The Spirit” being
irrelevant as you check off your adherence to their prescribed M.O.

Dogs get biscuits to roll over and you get to give them the four finger wave with thumb to your nose, as
you get a promotion and all expenses paid 10 day holiday.

Anyway things are going down as expected and obviously had to if you wanted to keep your job and
pension which is so coveted by all government people and envied by the people of the Lower Tier who
attempt to do it the hard way, the honest legitimate way in “The Spirit”

The Church has set them up very well making them easy pickings, eh

Well all that remains is the Final Letter of Disposition which will be quite a laugh I am sure and so obvious
to the people who are waiting to see it who have actually taken the time to comprehend the evidence.

You guys are just as bad covering up as you are at supporting the individual’s guarantee, but of course you
can not help it, you are the unscrupulous powers that be of State and Church

When the Final Letter of Disposition comes out Scorpions will be revered for their unpretentious traits.

One other thought just occurred to me, ha ha ha….I get it…..damn you are good Bob.

You played them for the fools that they are and as you know through studying the evidence they had to
make a move to stop to you, and although we all suspect that leverage is the name of the game you wanted
to document it because after all it would be mere speculation ha ha ha Right Bob if you turned on them and
told the truth how it went down if you did not have a promotion to prove obvious to their bribe.

Well damn, I am sorry Bob, not to have given it more thought, but after all Bob the evidence is so
irrefutable that you would not turn, after all it has gone on successfully for at least 2500 years.

320
Thanks to you the suffering of the masses will soon be over.

On the outside chance you are really in on the conspiracy I hope you really appreciate your new promotion
and the people will be well aware of what value you put on their lives and I am of the opinion they will not
be too pleased if they find out.

I and we of the Charter Democracy Force are so anxious as to the final out come we are reviewing our
M.O. to see if we can not expedite matters.

We appreciate your efforts to keep us informed and as you see we are well informed, Right?

If we do not have it right please advise immediately.

If you are on our side with us then we understand why it would not be prudent at this time and will await
until we are in possession of the Final Letter of Disposition from the RCMP Commissioner, Deputy
Minister immediately under the Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day, who believes he got away with
covering up the DOJ involvement with the RCMP pension fund scandal and the Government Organized
Crime with the same old ploy used 2500 years ago..
No doubt you will have a lot to offer when the people come to you first to find out what it is all about.

Of couse they could do it the hard way and actually study the evidence to coherency and would know the
truth but then would not know what to do with it due to unfamiliarity with truth.

Why would they? After all the government personnel are paid to and they do not bother and they get paid
so much better and even more if they are willing to let millions of people suffer the consequences.

At first I was thinking the value they place on human life was very minute before I pondered further
realizing the entire government, police, Armed Forces are all paid off to turn their heads the other way.

To make it even more pathetic they are paid off with the people’s money, who are not aware they are
paying for their own demise.

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception

321
322
323
June 30 2008

RCMP
William Elliot
Commissioner
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Frank Gallagher
Re: File 2007-1355445 34 Riverglen Drive
Government Organized Crime Keswick, On.
corruption and conspiracy frank@cdf.name

Dear Commissioner

With reference to the 30 day interim report dated June 20 2008 Staff Sergeant Robert MacAdam NCO i/c
inferred your office would be in possession of his report by June 24th at the latest and the Final Letter of
Disposition should follow shortly thereafter.

I have presumed you have been up to speed and in fact I have presumed you have been aware of the
evidence I have been e-mailing the RCMP using the Michael Thomson e-mail address since at least
January 2006 and I have inferred it was the office of the RCMP Commissioner who was originally
consulted on these most serious issues and were involved with the declining to investigate the Government
Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy.

The Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day and his predecessor, the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada Robert Nicholson and his predecessor Minister Vic Toews were also provided the
evidence well before I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP November 8
2007.

When I first started sending the evidence Zack was RCMP Commissioner who resigned over a scandalous
matter but I would like to mention Ted Knight of the North Shore News reported on September 13 2000
that Zack had told the country our sovereignty was under threat of elements of organized crime trying to
corrupt our political system.

I never heard anymore on this so I suspect his superiors got to him.

Of course you should be aware of this as it is published on the original Charter Democracy Force web site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force and you have been around for a while so I
presume you knew of it back when it was reported.

I also presume you were selected as RCMP Commissioner for your compatibility to the corrupt system
whether you are particularly adept or particularly incompetent easily steered in their unscrupulous ways.

The world has gone further insane, out of control due to the unscrupulous powers that be of State and
Church (Religious leaders) even though or perhaps because they have access to all the purportedly
intelligent minds proclaiming to be for the people who simply do not give a damn about anything but
themselves.

324
Without precise facts I have to rely on that which is predictable when members of the Law Societies hold
every position of authority.

I presume you have read the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document and know that I have sent it to
all the Bar Associations across Canada and the Federal Law Society who all see nothing wrong with the
manner in which my complaint filed against one of their members was handled.

As you study the manner in which all government departments and agencies have dealt with the issues that
began on June 30 2005 with the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal you can see the modus operandi
demonstrated by the Law Society is indicative of the entire system.

It is inevitable the world is doomed with such intelligent people at the helm who show no sign of
coherence to the words of Jesus, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” whereas I am not
religiously inclined but comprehend the concept and also understand the concept of deductive reasoning
with moral common sense whereas these words of Jesus are most receptive and conducive to world peace
and harmony amongst all humankind.

I cannot help but ponder the inanity of daily and weekly religious rituals where the message is loud and
clear, so simple that even the dumbest person would retain and understand if you kick someone there is a
damn good chance you will get kicked back even if you are the biggest dummy because although they may
get away with it for a period of time there are people a little brighter to reason a resolve, and should that
fail we can always depend on human nature to let chaos begin.

All the worlds problems involving humans are due to the unscrupulous nature of the powers that be or
wannabe powers that be who are prepared to do anything to satiate their desires and of course the more
wealth and power the more advantages and opportunity to do it where leverage is the catalyst rather than
fairness consistent with the words of Jesus.

People can pray and mingle with others all doing the same thing, sing hymns to the glory of Jesus, do a
little dance and spray seltzer down their pants but until everyone complies with the words of Jesus and
“Do unto others as they would them do unto you” chaos will continue.

In Canada where the supreme law recognizes the supremacy of God there can be no mistake as to “The
Spirit” of the law, the Constitution: Document where the words of Jesus are indicative of “The Spirit” and
in fact most defining and easiest to judge by.

The published evidence as all reality, shows the powers that be of State and Church proclaim their
conviction to “The Spirit” but invariably march to a different drummer.

The time for change passed eons ago but it is still not too late to get off the road to ruins.
There simply is not time for gradual change and in fact history attests to the fact it simply does not work.
Gradual change not only allows the moral to adjust but the immoral to rethink their approach.

It is obvious, demonstrated by the modus operandi of the Law Society of Upper Canada that even though
they proclaimed to have abided by the rules and regulations of their mandate the outcome was not what
one would expect in “The Spirit” of the aspirations attributed to God or consistent with the Constitution.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

325
It is far more than a reasonable presumption that any laws, policies, rules and regulations created by
members of the Law Societies would be just as inconsistent as well as any interpretations made by them
whereas the prodigious amount of evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site
www.cdf.name and affiliate sites irrefutably proves they have persistently acted inconsistent with the
Constitution.

Nobody is asking you to shoot them or to find them guilty but obviously there is a desperate need to bring the truth
to the people and that can be accomplished by filing the warranted charges against the office of the Ontario Attorney
General and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada where ultimately a PUBLIC INQUIRY is the
only viable resolve where the entire administration and enforcement must be restructured to be consistent with the
Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where the objective is to a moral society with
every individual complying with the words of Jesus which has nothing to do with praying or any of the hockus
pokus demonstrated by the powers that be of State and Church (Religious leaders)

That does not work for although we can presume everyone is innocent we can also presume they are not when they
do not “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

The members of the Law Society have weaved a tangled web of deceit and prevarication into the laws and legal
system that has surpassed any ones perception of sanity obviously done for the extraction of money from the
economy to provide the luxurious lifestyles of the members of the Law Societies, not to provide an efficient cost
effective justice system in “The Spirit” where the ramifications of their insatiable greed sucks the life out of the
economy in every move they make as insurance companies are given latitudes to deceive the people which end up in
long costly debates where lawyers on either side benefit, the victims never get all they are entitled to and all losses
are passed on to the consumer as is with everything where they are involved.

Reality is the consequence of the unscrupulous and the cause of the elusive Ideal of “The Spirit”
The difference being, that which holds them in pathetic disrepute.

The law is not an ass as many state for the Constitution is particularly conducive to a moral society in “The Spirit”
necessary for the success of all people to live in harmony in peace on earth.

It is the deliberate incompetence of the administers and enforcers of “The Spirit” that have created an atmosphere
where God cannot possibly exist where 30,000 people are left to die of starvation daily while riches abound looted
from the economies that were meant to nourish the people as they venture together into the unknown which
promises more for all.

Immediate change in attitude is imperative where due punishment is in order and the only viable option known to
humankind due the ignorance of the times.

RCMP Commissioner William Elliot

You have the opportunity to do so much by doing as little as doing the right thing for and with the moral majority of
the world populous where “The Spirit” of the law, God and the people are behind you all the way where once the
people know the true nature of the unscrupulous members of the Law Societies they will know where the problems
lie and can apply their efforts to providing them the mental help they need so their intelligence can be used for the
benefit of the people’s society instead of their own.

Their society dwarfs the absurdities of the KKK, White supremists and the ideologies associated with Hitler
and others akin.

The members of the Law Societies are intelligent people and will adapt quickly to “The Spirit” once it is enforced.

All that separates them from being in “The Spirit” is the people not knowing that they are not.

326
Once the people know the truth it will appear to be a lie as the Law Society members are forced to immediately
convert to “The Spirit” and carry on as if they were always in of and with “The Spirit” which they will manage well
using their forte as professional charlatans of the fine art of deception and prevarication to cover up what they once
were as they endeavour to structure the legal system consistent with the Constitution: Document where under the
scrutiny of the watchful eye of the people in “The Spirit” they will seal every door shut that once provided endless
opportunity for the unscrupulous to do the most unscrupulous things to the disastrous consequences that once beset
society.

Surely they are intelligent enough to know the personal consequences if they fail to deceive the people of their once
unscrupulous ways for even the slightest hint to stray in present and future times will immediately link them to the
disasters of the past and will be made to pay dearly as the people satisfy their need for revenge.

As we of the Charter Democracy Force are intent on getting the truth to the people we will eventually do so and it is
inane of you to continue in your ways providing evidence we can use to our initiatives where prolonging the matter
only exasperates the situation ensuring punishments of revenge rather than a sane approach to deterrence.

Drastic change is imminent and the sooner the better to prevent the imminent chaos headed our way and throughout
the world.

The predictable chaos cannot be diverted by the world powers that be who created the situation for all they can do,
which they will inevitably do when the situation gets worse and the people begin to stir against them is blame it on
the powers that be of other countries as we head into the final war in search of food that does not exist.

William

You have a humongously serious responsibility with the opportunity to do the right thing beginning with the issues
in Lawyer Files 1-4.

You already know the truth and it is just a matter of going through the formalities as per your legitimate
responsibilities where nature will take its course to the resolve.

From the moment you get things underway here in Canada the word will spread world wide as similar initiatives are
simultaneously put in place resulting in an environment conducive to the wellbeing of every individual in “The
Spirit” with attention to the powers that be who had persistently been behind the struggle of the people of the Lower
Tiers.

You know what must be done and you know it must be done by you.

Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force
www.cdf.name

PS

Who so ever brings the truth to the people will have the power of the people for ever.

The Catholic Church may notice this but I would much rather the RCMP who are out putting their lives on the line
for the people have the power to do it.

327
July 5 2008

RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot

Re: File # 2007-1355445

Which came first, the Chicken or the Egg?


It really does not matter does it?

Once the egg is hatched the chicken is in control and eggs are destined to be laid

Which came first, the Government or the People?


It really does not matter does it?

Does it really matter if what you believe is not true as long as you are happy?
Take cows for example

I have never met a happy looking cow but they seem content chowing down on the grass in the fields
They have never appeared too bright to me and their lives never seemed too exciting, perhaps because they
have no money to go into town to see a show or go to a Saturday night dance to intermingle.
When I ponder a little more I realize perhaps it is because they have everything they need right on the farm
with out going anywhere.
The luckier ones are born to a big herd with more cows to meet, socializing together and I can just imagine
two bulls leaning against a fence chatting while looking over the spread. It is a wonderful life. Three
squares a day…Check out the utters on Elsie. Yeh, some meat market we got here, without realizing their
destiny.
I have no idea what they believe but it must be a bit of a shock when they find out what goes on at the
slaughterhouse.
I guess none ever get a reprieve to be sent back to the farm or surely they would spread the word and
maybe even go to the police but then they look the same as the farmer and the people at the
slaughterhouse.
The more I think about it and reflect on the cows I have met I do not think they are too receptive to thought
and after all what is there to think about. When they are hungry they eat and when tired they sleep and
when they have something to say they moo, which pretty well is the only word they need in their
vocabulary to communicate their days events.
What would thought do for them anyway?
Their destiny has already been determined by their owner so knowing their destiny would be somewhat
disappointing and completely change their outlook on life.

Ignorance is bliss.

If it ain’t broken, do not fix it!!

This relationship has existed for centuries with cooperation on both sides that has worked well because of
fairness.

The farmer takes care of the organizing and seeing that the cows are fed while they are young and when
the cows become adults they reciprocate in kind.

328
Which came first, the Government or the People?

Now that is somewhat of a controversial subject that has been debated by humans for centuries and failure
to settle has been chaotic and hence the struggle of humankind.

Perhaps the problem is people have too large a vocabulary and why would they need it anyway when the
conclusions of their communications invariably ends up the same if they just used the word moo?

The Government and the People issue has a striking resemblance to the Farmer and Cow relationship
where the Government doe not give a boo about what the people moo and in the end it all works out the
same.

Confucius Kong 551 BC – 479 BC was born to poverty and rose to dine with kings experiencing life
through all walks of life and in the end chose to leave the upper class to walk with people throughout the
land philosophizing what he had come to know.

“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS…and MORALITY…finally I began to make out what was written
between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”

Do you see the similarity between the Farmer and the Cow and the Government and the People?

If not then let me begin and close our conversation. Moo.

To come to some kind of understanding we must realize that governments are an organization of people
that started out in life similar to the rest of us born innocent of empty mind and reared by parents or
guardians who fill our minds with what they have come to know or believe to be true, where their minds
were filled in the same way and so on back to the beginning of time which is the way we are brought up to
speed as to what has been learned through the ages.

We all require the same necessities to sustain life and it has been generally accepted that during our first
phase of existence we must learn how to survive on our own which begins with learning to walk before we
can run.

It appears strange that we people who proclaim for ourselves to be the most intelligent life form take up to
a year to learn how to walk when some animals are up and walking the day they are born.

Knowledge plays the major role with humans in this concept where they whose family tree begins with
solid roots with a willingness to learn adept to thought and receptive to reason pass on the legacy that
acquiesces through time most compatible to survival and providing a quality life style.

Environment also plays a major role that is relative to whom ones parents are where natural instinct drives
people to search out the environment they choose to exist where intelligence in ways of earning money
serves well.

329
It would be prudent to mention that there are presently near seven billion people on earth with unique
perceptions developed through the years where not only their parents or guardians play major roles but the
environment they are reared is a most significant factor.

As I write attempting to think all the way so as to convey pertinent information to a purpose so it will be
received and clearly understood easily to serve and accomplish the purpose I realize the most important
factor in conveying information is to first and foremost know what the hell I am talking about.

This is a very serious point and a constant prerequisite to any communication yet due the nature of the
reality the best one can hope to achieve is to present the truth and commentary reasoned as well as one can
with integrity, understanding that no matter how hard one tries they can not achieve the intended goal any
further than ones knowledge will allow them.

This of course is the way one becomes smarter by presenting what they believe they know to be true in
hopes the recipient of the information is of similar character aware of the necessity of consistency of truths
with the integrity to use them for moral purpose with a constant variable founded on the presumption of
trust.

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet is precisely due to perception.


If reality was the Ideal life would be so much simpler even with the fact that the Ideal is not a constant nor
can it ever be anything but a variable relative to time even if the entire populous were in concurrence quite
content with “How it is” at any moment in time.

Reality expands to infinity triangulating from point zero, the beginning into eternity, which we know
neither of and there are at least two controversial ideologies of thought and each take on a mind of its own
where truth always plays a major role if we are ever to determine what is what.

I have limited knowledge in data or statistics but I understand there is the religious and science ideology as
to how and where human life began where I have formed an opinion, which perhaps I have no reasonable
right to do not being a scholar of either disciplines of thought. At the moment even with all the efforts
scholars applied to each, a consensus has not been reached, perhaps providing useful knowledge that could
be used to end the struggle of human kind, which is the course of honourable purpose I have set upon
where many years had passed before my arrival on the case
The sketch to the right is not to scale but
attempts to illustrate where we are in my
perception. Born in 1942 much took place
before my arrival with religion and science
in bloom where present knowledge in
either discipline does not provide a place of
beginning nor an end of humankind where
each is of significant importance relative to
each other but emphasis must be placed on F
the here and now if there is not to be an G
untimely end to the human race where G
history shows until now a most pathetic
disgrace.
To define human race relative to the reality I have observed I see the pace quickening to the finish line not too
far away which needn’t concern me because one way or another my demise is predetermined about the same
time. Not aware as to our beginning and intended purpose I must presume the devil was intended to win.
330
My reasoning is done with basic knowledge representative of that which I have absorbed and retained over
65 years. Nothing to be particularly proud of with all there is to know for I have just picked up enough
information to get me by to a lifestyle I compromised between effort I was willing to apply to a life I was
prepared to accept always with the thought something better may happen along the way. Wishing and
hoping may well have taken up part of life but it did nothing to benefit it.

I never had high ambitions and never had direction as to what I would do with my life.
I knew I had the responsibility to survive the best way I could and to that endeavor I knew I needed a job
that I could enjoy and I found that in legal land surveying

You may have noticed I seemingly have no direction as I write while I appear to digress this way and that
but circumstances after retirement in August 2004 set me on a course of straight definite purpose with no
charted path nor any idea as to the extent of the arena that would be encompassed as I ventured into the
unknown with a definite purpose to achieve, that expanded into another purpose and another necessary to
achieve to resolve the initial purpose which seemed big so long ago but now relatively small in the whole
scheme of things and yet played a major role that initiated my trek to the resolve of more significance.

I am still on route using the knowledge I gained in my employment days with much I had stored that I had
no idea at the time how it would be used or if it ever would be used and now with enough knowledge much
more than I ever had when I chose the career I settled with to spend most of my life, I can’t help but think
if I could start over again with what I know now I would have made better use of my life, now having a
most honorable, onerous and formidable challenge of correcting the world all by myself.
It never occurred to me away back then and of course I was much saner then, innocent and more naïve and
would have passed the thought as insane as any sane person would for it requires at least two people of
similar thought to ricochet ideas of serious reasoning and perhaps a third to catch them before they
boomeranged and kicked us in the ass.

Having said that it is necessary to bring a person I am attempting to communicate with up to speed as to
where I am coming from with the hopes a response will bring me up to date where they are coming from
and with any luck have the same cause and priority to it where the majority of people are set in their ways
and prepared to ride it out where ever it takes them being the sane thing to do because the general populous
are of same mind and it got them through to this moment in time which is a relative thing marked on the
calendar so many days from a Christian consensus as to the day Jesus died on the cross.

They have learned the best way to deal with sorrow is to get over it and the more practice the better at it
and progresses to be adapted to every occasion where caring only cause’s grief.

Reality is a strange place to be if you attempt to resist insanity where absurdities run rampant but if you do
not go with the flow you will go insane which tends to make reality even stranger but never fear no one is
a stranger to insanity for we are all in it together and sanely adopted insanity to maintain our sanity secure.

Before you go over the edge or perhaps clinging to it you wonder why people who are all basically the
same requiring the same necessities to sustain life, susceptible to kindness, emotions and injury cannot get
along with each other.

Perhaps that is too general of a statement whereas in this instance I make reference to wars that have
persisted throughout history and in fact there was one going on when I was born in 1942, many in between,
a few on going and probably the really big one just warming up.

331
Many thoughts flash by along these lines before I can put them to paper so to save the effort take a few
moments to flash them by yourself and maybe a moment for the War Amps people who play that tune,
“Never Again” over and over, again and again for many years now as wars start up over and over again
and again.

It is all just part of life as is death, which does not really make a whole lot of sense when you think about it
so we will not.

We will just accept it like we do taxes as we hurry the pace on that thought having forgot about them as we
budgeted our hard earned money to pay the interest on our mortgage and car and other things which are not
considered necessities of life for us to survive to provide the government personnel what they believe is the
necessities of a moral society.

Gee, that brings us back to where I started from 3 ½ pages earlier and I have not yet answered the question.

Which came first, the Government or the People?

Government was in place long before I arrived on the scene so I can attest to which but I can reason that
without people there can be no government and in fact no need so I will say people came first.

Then the immediate question comes to mind is why do we need government and with some pondering I
can say to provide the necessities of a moral society of people who choose to live in close proximity of
each other.

A person or persons living in the wilderness would not have use for a government even though there are
many things they would appreciate perhaps like a hospital near by, but not obtrusive, and maybe one of
them thar flusho’matic toilets.

The hospital would be a nice thought but hardly could a person or a few afford to pay the financing, let
alone the doctor’s and nurse’s fees not making any money and all living off the land.
They would just have to take their chances on that score as well as they would have to on all fronts where
no matter how adept they are to catching squirrels, rabbits and raccoons, if there ain’t any they would have
to eat each other.

Cannot seem to get away from the words of Confucius, which is a good thing because it brings us back to
the reality intended to be addressed.

“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS…and MORALITY…finally I began to make out what was written
between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”

Priority is to addressing the major problem when resolved the smaller problems will vanish along with the
big.

Having advantage of knowledge published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.URus.ca I
know for fact the persistent struggle of humankind has always been caused by the unscrupulous powers
that be of State and Church (religious leaders) because their success is dependent on their ability to deceive
the people where they must be exceptionally good at being bad as they hone their prevarication skills.

332
There can be no doubt of their intentions once they venture down this road but they are well respected by their
cohorts and partners in crime where the affluent and influential support them who will reciprocate in kind.

Why they do it is simply explained, for money, a main ingredient of power and wealth.

Hand in hand they go, scratching each other’s backs all the way to the top where perhaps the answer is to have the
wealthiest person take the leadership right from the beginning presuming they have all the money they ever need but
just in case, there every move and financial portfolio must be stringently monitored.

Sorry, every once in a while I revert to moments of sane thought and then not being too familiar with the concept
having adapted to reality I wobble a lot but I believe it is a whole lot like riding a bicycle where once you get a
handle on it you can leave it indefinitely in the time allotted to us and come back to it with a few wobbles and then
you are off like once before.

No pun intended.

Well there is no point in wobbling around any further when everyone knows where I am headed anyway and the
sooner it is done the better for all the people of the moral majority.

I cannot over emphasize the importance of understanding reality is a word created and used by people to define in
general “How it is” which is a conglomeration of integrated realities that exist making up and affecting the whole.

Either all realities are flowing together with nature as a whole or they are tugging at the seams threatening the whole,
vital to us all.

Among the conglomeration of realities are environments within environments within environments where in efforts
to simplicity I have numbered them to address in general terms 1-3.

Environment # 1 (1)
The entire earth’s hemisphere, where the air is shared by every person of the near 7 billion people of unique
perception who exist on the planet today where if the world could be laid out flat as a map and a photograph taken to
the finest detail including x-ray visionary properties what would result is a snapshot of reality of the whole planet at
a precise moment in time where such a photo should reflect the Ideal. Why not? We are all people who know what
we need and want with the intelligence to go get it. Right? .

Environment # 2 (Multiple)
The customs, cultures and religious beliefs of countries where all people are randomly dispersed starting
out in the earth’s hemisphere born of innocent empty mind destined to be filled with the customs, cultures
and religious beliefs imposed on them by State and Church (religious leaders) whereas in some countries
they have freedom of religion and beliefs as long as they are within the parameters of the laws of the
country

Environment # 3 (Multiple)
Within the numerous Environment # 2 category there are many environments created by financial factors
ranging from below poverty to far above wealthy which is divided into the Upper and Lower Tiers where
the Upper Tier would be the preference of choice if the option was available but just as well it is not for the
simple reason necessary to the reality of the whole we must have a variety of talents in the labor force for
we cannot all be kings or who would do the work.

333
So as we have come to know in reality by starting at the bottom we can work our way up but when we
apply that scenario to the 3 environments why would one want to start at the bottom in Environment # 3
unless born there with no option, but to work your way up.

After all if you were pleasantly comfortable at the poverty line why would you want to get into the soup
line and live under whatever would keep the weather off you?

I know dealing with reality requires insanity to address it where we could ask the question, why is there
such an insane existence in reality unless reality is insane and of course we addressed that earlier where we
dealt with sorrow on page 4

Perhaps by now the people have realized that sorrow cannot be dealt with in the old way they have come
accustomed to because sorrow flourishes like anything unattended.

So change of attitude, out with the old, in with the new is necessary to our wellbeing and longevity where a
return to straight sanity must prevail if we are to address the situation in sane manner conducive to a sane
reality of the whole

You remember away back when you were ignorantly sane before you started asking questions as to why
this and why that and answered with because, do what I say not what I do, that’s “How it is” that is why.

Nothing has changed “How it is” is why we are asking why it is “How it is”

If we do not like it “How it is” why not change it after all it was just people who made it that way, so no
reason why people cannot just change it.

We all understand each other, not as if we are attempting to communicate with cows.
We all need food, air, a roof over heads, utilities, transportation, a job we can enjoy and feel useful and
earn a decent wage consistent with our efforts.

Nobody wants to be starving and nobody wants to be caught as a crook.

So what people need to do is organize to work in harmony conducive to world peace where we must put
emphasis on common sense so the sense in common of all environments is one and the same united in
common sense.

No problem, the people are already there being all human with identical senses and vulnerabilities where
we all want to be treated fairly as equals, nothing more and nothing less being decidedly the only way to
go to live in a peaceful world in harmony working together in purpose for the betterment of all where of
course we expect everyone to do their fair share.

We will table everything we know for the common good attentive to the greedy and the needy.

There has already been much effort to such an initiative which would be foolish to ignore and to that we
have adopted the wisdoms of Confucius and Jesus who we know to be privy of the aspirations attributed to
God and paraphrased the words of Confucius “Do not impose on others what you would not which for
yourself” and said the Golden Rule “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

334
In fact from this moment on with a slight moderation we of the Charter Democracy Force acting on behalf
of the world populace have henceforth adapted and adopted the Golden Rule as our spirit,
“The Spirit” of the Charter Democracy Force
“Do onto other as you would have them do onto you”
Well with that settled equally fair to every person of the world populace we have a solid foundation to set
the people on the right track and by use of The Spirit we have a benchmark to determine what and who
must be addressed to secure a safe world where everyone can work and live together in peace and harmony

Who would not agree to play fair and abide by the Golden Rule that is equally fair to everyone?

They of course are the people we seek out who are detrimental to the wellbeing of the world populous.

To achieve the Ideal in Environment # 1 (1) we must all be able to communicate with common sense
even though there are a preponderance of special interest groups who think them self special because it is
presently the natural thing to do which has overwhelmingly been proven not to be the natural thing to do in
the Ideal of Environment # 1 (1) in the reality of the whole that must be consistent with the Ideal,
where reality must be one and the same with the Ideal.

It may seem somewhat befuddling but necessary for the befuddling of the present befuddlement, which
you will come to realize as it unfolds.

It is an all or nothing situation we have on our hands where the 3 Environments must be all for one and one
for all.
Kinda like the Three Musketeers, Eh?

Necessary to the cause we must maintain strict adherence to common sense which happens to be consistent
with the Golden Rule which is actually a very simple rule to follow and likely to be most receptive to any
person of moral common sense.

Any person who does not comprehend the meaning of the Golden Rule and the necessity to comply for the
safety and wellbeing of every individual would have to be mentally insane and when a person is found to
be in noncompliance with the Golden Rule initiatives will be taken to get them the necessary help with
priority one to the safety and wellbeing of every individual presumed to be innocent and in compliance
with the Golden Rule where they must cooperate in “The Spirit” at all times to confirm the presumption.
When reasonable evidence is provided indicating one’s noncompliance it is their responsibility to
cooperate with the Law Officers to resolve the issue where a person presumed to be innocent would be
pleased for the opportunity to prove their innocence immediately so as not to exasperate or prolong the
issue where such idiocies only increase the costs to the taxpayers, being detrimental to the moral populace
and beneficial to the immoral encouraging immoral persuasion and undoubtedly not fair to the victim.

Since the Charter Democracy Force is founded in Canada morally and peacefully inclined respective of
law and order necessary to the support of “The Spirit” we accept the verbiage of the Constitution read in
consistency with “The Spirit” whereas the first line of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states
“Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.”

The Golden Rule is the personification of the aspirations attributed to God and we hold that to be “The
Spirit” of the law.

335
The Spirit

Henceforth “The Spirit” of the law, “The Spirit” of God, “The Spirit” of the Charter Democracy Force
and “The Spirit” of the majority of the people” are one and the same with “The Spirit” and all will be
known as and deemed to be “The Spirit”

The verbiage of the Charter is consistent with “The Spirit” and we draw particular attention to

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms


1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free
and democratic society.

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b)
freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of
communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived
thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based
on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or
denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers
appropriate and just in the circumstances.

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters
within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest
Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters
within the authority of the legislature of each province.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force
or effect.

Consistency to purpose with “The Spirit” of the law

If every individual is to be guaranteed equality in protection and benefit before and under the law there
must be a consistency to protect the presumed innocent whereas when reasonable evidence is provided to
the police that a person is in noncompliance with the law they must be permitted to perform their duty to
collect evidence to bring the person before the courts to determine their innocence or guilt.

If everyone is presumed innocent until they have had their day in court and evidence is not allowed to be
collected in the meantime to prove ones guilt then every person must be deemed innocent and we may as
well disband the police and save the taxpayers money.
336
The people can take care of the situation in vigilante groups without concern of ever being found guilty of
anything because they too will be deemed innocent and with no police who is to stop them?

8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.

Where does it state in the Constitution that a warrant is required for a search or to carry
out an investigation when reasonable evidence has been provided to the police?

Where does it state a court can make a court decision before the court is convened?

Where does it say the members of the court are psychic of superior intelligence and do not
require evidence to make a decision of innocence?

The Law Society of Upper Canada believe they can make such decisions if it
involves complaints against their members but I do not see that in the
Constitution

“The Spirit” of the law is intended to protect the presumed innocent from the guilty
presumed innocent but assuredly there must be guilty people out there or we would not
need the whole damn legal system in the first place.

The term legal system implies the personnel of the system will be legitimate competent
responsible irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to protect every individual and
society as a whole.

Where does it state that common sense has nothing to do with the law?

Obstructing the police in performance of their duty to secure irrefutable evidence to assure no person
is wrongfully punished or incarcerated has to be considered a criminal offense.

Only upon arrest are the police required to inform a suspected criminal of their rights.

When a person is suspected of driving a vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicating substance
and refuses to cooperate with the police who are trying to protect the people of society, the person
can be charged with an equivalent offense of refusing to take the test and in fact are for all intent and
purpose guilty on the spot before going to court whereas it is a reasonable presumption one failing to
cooperate had something to hide.

If the person truly believed they were innocent it would be absurd not to take the test to prove their
innocence and just as absurd not to take the test even if they believed they were over the limit
because they will be immediately found guilty if they don’t, so what the hell, may as well go for it.

There is no difference if reasonable evidence has been provided to the police of noncompliance and a
person refusing to allow a search of their person or property if it is reasonable to do so in normal
investigative practice of the complaint filed against them.

If a person is stopped on the road for a traffic violation and they are believed to be intoxicated the
officer is allowed to follow up on that and if there is reason to believe the person is armed they most
certainly must be allowed to follow up on that.

When an investigation warranted by reasonable evidence provided against a person is underway and
evidence of another crime is revealed it is beyond reason for the police not to be allowed to follow up
on that.

337
10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention (a) to be informed promptly of the reasons
therefore; (b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right;
and (c) to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released
if the detention is not lawful.

11. Any person charged with an offence has the right (a) to be informed without unreasonable delay
of the specific offence; (b) to be tried within a reasonable time; (c) not to be compelled to be a
witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offence; (d) to be presumed innocent
until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial
tribunal; (e) not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause; (f) except in the case of an offence
under military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum
punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment; (g) not to be
found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it
constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal according to the general
principles of law recognized by the community of nations; (h) if finally acquitted of the offence, not to
be tried for it again and, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or
punished for it again; and (i) if found guilty of the offence and if the punishment for the offence has
been varied between the time of commission and the time of sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser
punishment.

How can there be such an entity as a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal
if the person or persons cannot possibly be charged in the first place with reference to the
government personnel all under the advisement of the Attorney Generals where the police may
consult with the Attorney General but they must make the charges if he hasn’t convince them not to
file charges against him and once the charges have been laid it is up to him as to whether to proceed
against himself or not.

When you consider this and the police are required to get a warrant before they can investigate it
makes it impossible to get the ring leader of the government organized crime or anyone else under
his advisement, which is the entire government.

This obviously is not in “The Spirit” of the Constitution but consistent with the conspiracy.

24 (2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a
manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter, the evidence
shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in
the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

This is also inconsistent with “The Spirit” because the entire administration of justice has been irrefutably
proven to be in disrepute before the trial begins as documented on the Charter Democracy Force web sites.

There simply is no one in the government to sign a warrant against any of their members if they do not
want to.

This is not consistent with “The Spirit” and the entire legal system is in conflict of interest that does not
give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights that they were financed and authorized to
support.

There is no logical or legitimate reason to obstruct the police of investigating to collect sufficient evidence
to prove beyond reasonable doubt a person is guilty of a crime in noncompliance with the Constitution.

The law in no way is intended to protect the criminal element from the justice of the people.

338
We already know the unscrupulous character of the legal profession who are not required to give a damn
about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights while we are to believe they are operating a legitimate
system to protect the individual’s as guaranteed.

The evidence is irrefutable of the Government organized crime operated by the members of the Law
Societies and there is sufficient and reasonable evidence to suggest they are also involved with the
manipulation of the stock markets, which has caused the recent disastrous affect of fuel and food shortage.

There can be no doubt this is nothing other than their usual practice that just happened to get out of their
control and has exposed them.

If they are innocent there would be no reason for them not to cooperate in “The Spirit” of the law and
permit you to investigate their personal financial portfolios.

The evidence shows they are intoxicated with wealth and power looking for more wealth and power and if
they refuse to let you test the presumption they are guilty.

The fact is they have been irrefutably been proven to be without authority to obstruct any investigation or
administer and enforce any law in “The Spirit” of the Constitution and immediate action must be taken to
remove them from any position in the Canadian Government.

Yes this is a very serious matter that they willfully brought upon themselves by willfully persecuting the
people who trusted and financed them to protect them consistent with “The Spirit”

Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force

339
July 12 2008

RCMP Commissioner
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Pierre Leduc
Executive Assisstant to the Commissioner
pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt. www.cdf.name


Royal Canadian Mounted Police Frank Gallagher
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of Crime Section Keswick, On
345 Harry Walker Parkway South franklyone@hotmail.com
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sergeant Roy Steinebach

roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Regular Forces

Sergeant Karen Delorey


Non Commissioned Officer in Charge
Professional Standards Unit
255 Attwell Drive

Milton Detachment
Inspector Brian Verheul
Regular Forces
brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Investigation of refusing to investigate


Government Organized Crime
Corruption and conspiracy
Your File 2007-1355445

Dear RCMP members

The last letter I received from the RCMP was dated July 11 2008 from Sergeant Karen Delorey,
Professional Standards Unit in which she stated a Final Report has been submitted for review to the line
officer of Sergeant Roy Steinbach and inspector Brian Verheul for review.
As soon as a decision is rendered I will be advised via a letter of disposition.

Since more than 30 days has passed and I was informed I would receive a status report every thirty days
until I receive the Final Letter of Disposition I am informing that I am expecting said 30 day report.

The Final Letter of Disposition was originally promised 30 days from the March 20 2008 interim report by
Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam.

340
Given the serious nature of issues and the irrefutable proof of the Government Organized Crime of
corruption and conspiracy it is incomprehensible that the matter is not being attended to in the manner in
which it deserves.

It is consistent with the evidence though and I presume you are all doing your best to manipulate
yourselves out of this but it will invariably just add fuel to the fire the same as the July 26 2008 Saturday
Toronto Star item on the middle class not being able to access the legal system because it is unaffordable
being an admittance of that which I have charged only it is an attempt to brush it under the rug as if it has
been okay for ever how long it has been inaccessible which is a long time I am sure and is evidence of the
two tier system they will deny exists.

Well anyway I am providing you with a new web address for your attention and I await your response as to
what you people are up to.
http://groups.google.com/group/cdf-taming-of-the-shrewd

The truth is preferred but whatever…It will serve a significant purpose.

Thank You

Frank Gallagher

PS

Perhaps some day the people will be able to trust you for your merit.

Deception will be coming more difficult in any event

341
July 16 2008

RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot
Motion for Sanity

God can not be wise if we were born in his image

Constitution Act, 1982


Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

Charter Democracy Force


www.cdf.name

The Law Society of Upper Canada has been identified as a major player in the Government Organized
Crime who has conspired against the populous of the Canadian Society to support their avarice lust for
wealth and power.
Motive, Opportunity, Admittance

http://charter-democracy-force.googlegroups.com/web/Part1LawSocietyofUpperCanada.doc
http://charter-democracy-force.googlegroups.com/web/Part2LawSocietyofUpperCanada.doc

The above links to the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document irrefutably proves the Law Society
des not require its members to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and evidence
is irrelevant to them because the entire legal system is illegitimate with every position of authority filled by
their members with all bases covered and the system rigged for their members to ransack society with the
ramifications horrific.

The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada Lawyers Rules of Conduct.

(103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit as
well as in the letter.

The Constitution: Document itself has been corrupted from the very first line of the Charter
Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

The Spirit
Supremacy of God

Golden Rule
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

The rule of law


“Roles and Responsibility of the Attorney General”
http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/ag/agrole.asp
That most elusive concept – the rule of law- a well established legal principle, hard to easily define that
protects the individual and society as a whole.

342
Obvious conflict between The Spirit and The rule of law built into the Constitution but “The Spirit”
has supremacy, priority one.
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a
free and democratic society.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived
thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based
on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect

Consistencies and Inconsistencies

The Constitution must be interpreted in “The Spirit” to maintain consistency

From their own documents we can see they cannot be trusted because they cannot help themselves as they
are traditionally deceitful prevaricators not interested in effective efficient justice but instead long drawn
out litigations for money thereby depriving the taxpayer and the people of their guaranteed Charter rights
of equal protection and equal benefit of the law.

It is impossible to back the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights without putting a diligent modus
operandi in place with competent responsible irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to do
so.

The rule of law is incompetent to support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights being inconsistent with
“The Spirit” of the law that has supremacy and priority.

The Attorney General has a constitutional and traditional responsibility


The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and as the "guardian of the public interest"
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.

The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is
maintained and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.

So we can see from the onset the unscrupulous conniving nature of the members of the legal profession, the law
makers, the people who wrote the Constitution and the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” which
was obviously written prior to the enactment of the Constitution with the incompetence of the rule of law obviously
known by the authors of the Constitution who have never made any attempt to make it “effective and efficient” for
obvious reason to consistently deprive the people.

343
There can be no doubt they never intended to support the individuals guaranteed Charter rights but they out
connived themselves by recognizing the supremacy of God “The Spirit” having priority over the intended
incompetence of the rule of law which they had been using to carry on their unscrupulous ways

Tis a web of deceit they weaved when first they practiced to deceive.
It certainly is consistent with the book by University of British Columbia history professor Jonathan
Swainger who makes reference to a book by Edmund Morgan who asserts the success of any form of
government is dependent on their adeptness to deceive the people and in a democracy it is necessary to
have the people believe they have a voice and their representatives are the people.
Click on for Jonathan Swainger Book

http://books.google.com/books?id=eRHTr2TCBMwC&pg=PA19&dq=roles+and+responsibilities+of+the+
attorney+general+canada&sig=hi6yCnnxTgLu6Qjx9yJS2U80xG4#PPA19,M1

Plan A
Success for the people

Responsibilities of the Attorney General in “The Spirit” of the law


“Guardian of the public interest”

From the fixed Smorgasbord of deceit and prevarication after removing the inconsistencies in “The Spirit”
of the law we have:

The Attorney General is the chief legal advisor with a constitutional responsibility, and is the “guardian of
the public interest”

The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure Cabinet actions are legally
and constitutionally valid.

Plan B
Success for Government conspiracy

Responsibilities of the Attorney General in the spirit of the traditional unscrupulous ways of the
members of the Law Societies “Guardian of the rule of law”

The Attorney General has a traditional responsibility “judicial-like”

As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.

The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is
maintained

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General
and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether

344
or not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the
prosecution should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.

We can see nothing but conflict for the Attorney General to sort out as he goes about advising the
government departments and agencies that is impossible to maintain consistency with the Constitution
right from the outset with “The Spirit” of the law defined supreme and priority one clearly stated
recognizing the supremacy of God, but has a special responsibility as “guardian of the rule of law” that
is incompetent to do so.
Since he is the chief legal advisor with a constitutional responsibility and “guardian of the public
interest” he is required to advise Cabinet and ensure their actions are legally and constitutionally
valid.

Clearly the verbatim of the law was intended to be ambiguous so the Attorney General can go anyway he
chooses and when it come to complaints about the administration and enforcement of the Constitution
Plan B is predetermined fixed tight against the individual of the Lower Tier.

What is an individual going to do against Goliath, eh?


Fight for the individuals rights against the individual’s tax money and the entire government system they
believe is theirs.

The evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name and 10 affiliate sights is
consistent with the Attorney General Plan B and inconsistent with his legitimate responsibilities in Plan A
consistent with “The Spirit” of the law conducive to the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights and society as a whole.

In a legal system where the presumption of innocence is to be maintained until found guilty in a court of
law it would be considered obstruction of justice for the Attorney General to block an individuals
pursuance of justice entitled to by the Constitution.

Obviously when it is the Attorney General who is being charged and the police consult with him he will
put his specially trained tongue in the fine art of deception and prevarication in over time to convince the
police not to lay charges but even if he is unsuccessful he gets the final decision to decide whether or not to
proceed where I suggest his decision is predictable.

There can be no doubt the Constitution and Legal System are seriously in disrepute.

Motive, Opportunity and Admittance are obvious demonstrated in their modus operandi as they dealt with
my two completely different cases involving members of the Law Society.

If their was a hint of competence, responsibility, irreproachability one of the prominent members of the
governments in the AAAAAALIST would have been aghast if they had of read the evidence and if they
did not bother are obviously incompetent and irresponsible.

There can be no doubt as to their conspiracy intent and success to date

I remind you an interim report is due July 20 2008 and any further delay in filing charges against the
government personnel addressed in Lawyer Files 1-4 attentive to collecting evidence as to the involvement
of the Attorney General is incomprehensible and indicative of the don’t give a damn about the individual’s

345
guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and equal benefits before and under the law as the people are
in harms way as I write.
The Attorney General is responsible to advise those people and it is just a matter of formality to have them
admit they acted under the advisement of the Attorney General.

The length of time attending to this matter is akin to the Law Society of Upper Canada addressing my
complaint against their member taking 60 days to investigate the complaint without bothering to look at
the evidence they state.

Surely if they were not looking at the evidence and they knew their regulations it wouldn’t have taken 60
days for their decision.

Surely they were scrambling for a way out for their member when there was no legitimate one.
Surely they never figured this would get to the public.

How obvious if they had of looked at the evidence, which I am sure they did they would have found him
guilty as charged.

They were obviously desperate to respond and so flustered they admitted their members are not required to
give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and evidence is irrelevant in dealing with
their members.

Why would they think they could get away with such a response when they knew I was determined to get
to the truth?
Inadvertently they admitted the truth for all to see and backed it up by demonstrating how they dealt with
the complaint.

I would not be surprised if the Attorney General was consulted on this matter too and I expect you to look
into it thoroughly.

I remind you the evidence is spread far and wide, if that is what the Law Society was thinking.

Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force
www.URus.ca

346
July 17 2008

RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot
Motion for Sanity

God can not be wise if we were born in his image

Constitution Act, 1982


Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

Charter Democracy Force


www.cdf.name

The Law Society of Upper Canada has been identified as a major player in the Government Organized
Crime who has conspired against the populous of the Canadian Society to support their avarice lust for
wealth and power.
Motive, Opportunity, Admittance

http://charter-democracy-force.googlegroups.com/web/Part1LawSocietyofUpperCanada.doc
http://charter-democracy-force.googlegroups.com/web/Part2LawSocietyofUpperCanada.doc

The above links to the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document irrefutably proves the Law Society
does not require its members to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and evidence
is irrelevant to them because the entire legal system is illegitimate with every position of authority filled by
their members with all bases covered and the system rigged for their members to ransack society with
horrific ramifications.

The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada Lawyers Rules of Conduct.

(103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit as
well as in the letter.

The Constitution: Document itself has been corrupted from the very first line of the Charter
Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

The Spirit
Supremacy of God

Golden Rule
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

The rule of law


“Roles and Responsibility of the Attorney General”
http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/ag/agrole.asp
That most elusive concept – the rule of law- a well established legal principle, hard to easily define that
protects the individual and society as a whole.

347
Obvious conflict between The Spirit and The rule of law is built into the Constitution but “The Spirit”
has supremacy, priority one.
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a
free and democratic society.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived
thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based
on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect

Consistencies and Inconsistencies

The Constitution must be interpreted in “The Spirit” to maintain consistency

From their own documents we can see they cannot be trusted because they cannot help themselves as they
are traditionally deceitful prevaricators not interested in effective efficient justice but instead long drawn
out litigations for money thereby depriving the taxpayer and the people of their guaranteed Charter rights
of equal protection and equal benefit of the law.

It is impossible to back the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights without putting a diligent modus
operandi in place with competent responsible irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to do
so.

The rule of law is incompetent to support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights being inconsistent with
“The Spirit” of the law.

The Attorney General has a constitutional and traditional responsibility


The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and as the "guardian of the public interest"
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.

The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is
maintained and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.

So we can see from the onset the unscrupulous conniving nature of the members of the legal profession, the law
makers, the people who wrote the Constitution and the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” that
was obviously written prior to the enactment of the Constitution with the incompetence of the rule of law obviously
known by the authors of the Constitution who have never made any attempt to make it “effective and efficient” for
obvious reason to consistently deceive and deprive the people.

348
There can be no doubt they never intended to support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights but they out
connived themselves by recognizing the supremacy of God “The Spirit” having priority over the intended
incompetence of the rule of law which they had been using to carry on in their unscrupulous ways

Tis a web of deceit they weaved when first they practiced to deceive.
It certainly is consistent with the book by University of British Columbia history professor Jonathan
Swainger who makes reference to a book by Edmund Morgan who asserts the success of any form of
government is dependent on their adeptness to deceive the people and in a democracy it is necessary to
have the people believe they have a voice and their representatives are the people.

Click on for Jonathan Swainger Book


http://books.google.com/books?id=eRHTr2TCBMwC&pg=PA19&dq=roles+and+responsibilities+of+the+
attorney+general+canada&sig=hi6yCnnxTgLu6Qjx9yJS2U80xG4#PPA19,M1

Plan A
Success for the people

Responsibilities of the Attorney General in “The Spirit” of the law


“Guardian of the public interest”

From the fixed Smorgasbord of deceit and prevarication after removing the inconsistencies in “The Spirit”
of the law we have:

The Attorney General is the chief legal advisor with a constitutional responsibility, and is the “guardian of
the public interest”

The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure Cabinet actions are legally
and constitutionally valid.

Plan B
Success for Government conspiracy

Responsibilities of the Attorney General in the spirit of the traditional unscrupulous ways of the
members of the Law Societies “Guardian of the rule of law”

The Attorney General has a traditional responsibility “judicial-like”

As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.

The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is
maintained

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General
and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether

349
or not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the
prosecution should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.

We can see nothing but conflict for the Attorney General to sort out as he goes about advising the
government departments and agencies that is impossible to maintain consistency with the Constitution
right from the outset with “The Spirit” of the law defined supreme and priority one, clearly stated
recognizing the supremacy of God, but has a special responsibility as “guardian of the rule of law” that
is incompetent to do so.
Since he is the chief legal advisor with a constitutional responsibility and “guardian of the public
interest” he is required to advise Cabinet and ensure their actions are legally and constitutionally
valid.

Clearly the verbatim of the law was intended to be ambiguous so the Attorney General can go anyway he
chooses and when it came to complaints about the administration and enforcement of the Constitution Plan
B is predetermined fixed tight against the individual of the Lower Tier.

What is an individual going to do against Goliath, eh?


Fight for the individuals rights against the individual’s tax money and the entire government system they
believe is theirs.

The evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.URus.ca and 10 affiliate sites is
consistent with the Attorney General Plan B and inconsistent with his legitimate responsibilities in Plan A
consistent with “The Spirit” of the law conducive to the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights and society as a whole.

In a legal system where the presumption of innocence is to be maintained until found guilty in a court of
law it would be considered obstruction of justice for the Attorney General to block an individuals
pursuance of justice entitled to by the Constitution.

Obviously when it is the Attorney General who is being charged and the police consult with him he will
put his specially trained tongue in the fine art of deception and prevarication in over time to convince the
police not to lay charges but even if he is unsuccessful he gets the final decision to decide whether or not to
proceed where I suggest his decision is predictable.

There can be no doubt the Constitution and Legal System are seriously in disrepute.

Motive, Opportunity and Admittance are obvious demonstrated in their modus operandi as they dealt with
my two completely different cases involving members of the Law Society.

If their was a hint of competence, responsibility, irreproachability one of the prominent members of the
governments in the AAAAAALIST would have been aghast if they had of read the evidence and if they
did not bother are obviously incompetent and irresponsible.

There can be no doubt as to their conspiracy intent and success to date

I remind you an interim report is due July 20 2008 and any further delay in filing charges against the
government personnel addressed in Lawyer Files 1-4 attentive to collecting evidence as to the involvement
of the Attorney General is incomprehensible and indicative of the don’t give a damn about the individual’s

350
guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and equal benefits before and under the law as the people are
in harms way as I write.
The Attorney General is responsible to advise those people and it is just a matter of formality to have them
admit they acted under the advisement of the Attorney General.

The length of time attending to this matter is akin to the Law Society of Upper Canada addressing my
complaint against their member taking 60 days to investigate the complaint without bothering to look at
the evidence..

Surely if they were not looking at the evidence and they knew their regulations it would not have taken 60
days for their decision.

Surely they were scrambling for a way out for their member when there was no legitimate one.
Surely they never figured this would get to the public.

How obvious if they had looked at the evidence, which I am sure they did, they would have found him
guilty as charged.

They were obviously flustered when they admitted their members are not required to give a damn about
the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and evidence is irrelevant in dealing with their members.

Why would they think they could get away with such a response when they knew I was determined to get
to the truth?
Inadvertently they admitted the truth for all to see and demonstrated it in the manner they dealt with the
complaint.

I would not be surprised if the Attorney General was consulted on this matter too and I expect you to look
into it thoroughly.

I remind you the evidence is spread far and wide, if that is what the Law Society was thinking.

Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force
www.cdf.name

PS

The Constitution is a premeditated scam.

Roy McMurchy was the Ontario Attorney General who played a major role in the patriation of the
Constitution and the Charter.
After he helped out with the scam here he went over to England and helped them before returning to be
Ontario Chief Justice to retire about a year ago.

351
July 29 2008 Dictatorship

RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sergeant Roy Steinebach


roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Inspector Brian Verheul


Milton Detachment
brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Investigation refused to investigate


Government Organized Crime
Corruption and conspiracy
Your File 2007-1355445

Dear Sirs

As you are aware on November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the
RCMP for refusing to investigate Government corruption and conspiracy whereas RCMP Staff Sergeant
R.B. MacAdam was assigned to investigate the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web
site under the RCMP Act.
On July 11 2008 Sergeant Karen Delorey Non Commissioned Officer in Charge, Professional Standards
Unit wrote “the investigation into this matter is complete and a Final Report has been submitted for review
to the line officer of the 2 RCMP members who refused to investigate.” As soon as a decision is rendered I
will be advised via a letter of Disposition.”

In the meantime I have created a new site


Charter Democracy Force Boomerangs Tyrannical Democracy Constitution Scam
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force-boomerangs where much of the evidence
provided with the original complaint has been brought forward or links have been provided to it.

A prodigious number of Government personnel, federal and provincial whose e-mail addresses are
published in the AAAAALIST document have also been provided the evidence along with the web site
addresses where the evidence and commentary is published and this document will be published on the
above web site on the RCMP page and also provided to the same e-mail addresses.

I request you all to study this new site until you are coherent to the reality the evidence attests, to be
prepared for a public inquiry and to ponder sanely as to what needs to be done to restructure the entire
system consistent with “The Spirit” of the Constitution with priority to every individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights whereas every government personnel must be made to understand “The Spirit” of the law is
consistent with the Golden Rule and must act in continuity up and down the chain of authority laterally and
diagonally where every government personnel must be competent responsible and irreproachable with

352
fortitude and conviction to priority one, the equal safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed
by the Charter.

At present there is no such personnel on staff believing it is not their responsibility, which is absolutely
ridiculous with such attitude permitting a tyrannical government to take over right under their noses led by
the office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the provincial Attorney Generals
all members of the Law Societies who have used their privileged authority granted them in trust by the
people to ransack them for humongous benefit to the members of the Law Societies who are well aware of
that most elusive concept –the rule of law- hard to easily define that protects the individual and society as
whole.

They have wreaked havoc on society persistently creating a preponderance of problems where an
extraordinary amount of money is wasted to cover up the extraordinary amount of money they waste doing
anything but providing the necessities of society where immorality runs rampant believing they have the
right to do so whereas immorality must be nipped in the bud and the first place to begin is to put the
members of the Law Society under a magnifying glass exposing them for what they are, a cancer that
threatens to destroy the entire body of Canada.

Their unscrupulous spirit runs rampant in the governments around the world creating the reality that exists
today with them pitting the populace of the world against each other to serve them in their persistent
pursuit of wealth and power where the power struggles begin in each country with the people of the Lower
Tiers of the world populous oblivious to the truth with the media cooperating with the powers that be to
befuddle their minds necessary for the success of the powers that be.

These people who are in consistent pursuit of wealth and power to satiate their insatiable greed are all of
the same unscrupulous nature in cooperation with the huge corporate conglomerates, oil companies, banks,
utilities…whatever, scratching each others backs all the way to the top whereas the wannabe powers that
be are of the same nature all charlatans specialist in deceit and prevarication although inherently the
incumbent powers that be are the enemies of the wannabe’s they have a common understanding or belief
that the people of the Lower Tiers are insignificant others to be used any which way the incumbent powers
that be see fit for their personal interests and benefits.

That is how it was when the powers that be killed Jesus for spreading “The Spirit”, the Golden Rule and
when “The Spirit” did not die with the body and they saw the power of “The Spirit” to control the people
they harnessed it for themselves making the people believe they were now in of and with “The Spirit”
when they began to publish their bibles and religious books approximately 265 years after Jesus died
founded on scriptures of myths and prevarications applying their own interpretations adapted to their
personal interests and benefits.

Obviously this is inconsistent with “The Spirit” intended of the aspirations attributed to God, the Golden
Rule and hence the persistent struggle of humankind and the persistent chaotic state of the world that can
only continue to infinity, which could be relatively not too far away if they are allowed to persist.

In Canada the circumstances are particularly conducive to the necessary change consistent with the
supreme law of Canada, the Constitution where once the restructuring of the government is underway
change will resound around the world as sense in common of the numerous countries unite as one with
common sense consistent with “The Spirit”

353
It is a rather simple thing where the difficulty is getting started but the stage has been set by the Charter
Democracy Force with the obvious truths having been tabled that require competent responsible
irreproachable people of fortitude and conviction to deal with them realistically to the Ideal as guaranteed
by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web site is
inconsistent with the Charter having not been updated since the enactment of the Constitution Act,
1982.
The very first line of the Charter is also inconsistent and in fact presents conflict of interest detrimental to
the people “Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the
rule of law”

It clearly states the supremacy of God and therefore the Golden Rule, a summary of the aspirations
attributed to God is “The Spirit” of the Constitution consistent with the verbiage of the Charter with one
exception, that most elusive concept the rule of law a well established legal principle but hard to easily
define.

Obviously the rule of law is incompetent to protect the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and is
inconsistent with the Constitution and subordinate to the supremacy of God.

“The Spirit” is consistent with the properties of democracy and in particular consistent with:

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

The rule of law introduces an inconsistency being vulnerable to misinterpretation by the Attorney General
whereas he must also be consistent with the Constitution as everyone else.

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters
within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest
Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters
within the authority of the legislature of each province.

According to the outdated “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” he is responsible to be the
guardian of the public interest and the guardian of the rule of law, which are adverse to each other
and the rule of law is particularly inconsistent with “The Spirit” which has priority under the supremacy of
God and is therefore the rule of law is of no force or effect.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Obviously the Constitution must be consistent and the establishment must be consistent with the
Constitution if we are to be able to determine that which is inconsistent with “The Spirit” of the
Constitution and decidedly the rule of law is blatantly inconsistent as defined in the “Roles and
Responsibilities of the Attorney General” which is also inconsistent with “The Spirit” throughout its
entirety.

354
It is the rule of law that the members of the Law Society thrive on to the humongous detriment of
every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights that has made the system so costly that it is prohibitive
to the middle class allowing the criminal element to flourish whereas punishment attentive to
deterrence is the first and only method of preventing the predictable.

The members of the Law Society of Upper Canada are themselves detrimental to the guaranteed
Charter rights of every individual as irrefutably proven in the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada
document.

It is the rule of law that is tearing society apart whereas the Attorney General must make a most serious
decision as to whether he is with the people, priority one in “The Spirit” of the Constitution or remain the
course and be prepared to accept the wrath of the people to be dealt with in such manner as to provide an
example as to how people will be dealt with in the future should they attempt to turn our democracy into
tyranny.

The Saturday Star July 26 2008 has an item where the Chief Justice of Ontario admits to the serious
problem I have identified, where the middle class can not afford to access the system and in fact it could
cost $60,000 dollars for 3 days in civil court.

The issue that has to be addressed is why does it take 3 days and why so much?
The answer has already been explained and inherent to the design with that most elusive concept the rule
of law hard to easily define which they deliberately adhere to for their luxurious benefit and refuse to
amend to be consistent with “The Spirit” and the people’s guaranteed Charter rights

They knowingly allowed this to persist until it was brought to their attention with persistent and consistent
pressure and now consistent with their unscrupulous nature and consistent modus operandi to appear as if
they are addressing the matter responsibly as they must do when they are caught as they did when they
created the Ombudsman and others, and as the federal government enacted the Accountability Act, with
the cooperation of the media attempt to pull another fast one as they manipulate in their charlatan ways of
deceit and prevarication to fool the people again.

A report prepared for the Ontario Attorney General determined the middle class were denied access to the
legal system because they did not qualify for legal aid and the costs for court was prohibitive, which I have
stated many times and entered as evidence that their modus operandi was not conducive to the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights of equality of protection and benefits attentive to fairness.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Many times I wrote it is impossible to administer justice equally and fairly consistent with the Constitution
when money is allowed to interfere and the entire justice system must be available to every individual free
of charge financed through taxation.

Just as obvious is the fact that justice is impossible to be achieved when administered and enforced by the
members of the Law Society who has adamantly stated or implied in the 2 part Law Society of Upper
Canada document their members are not required to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights where their only obligation is to vigorously advance the interests of their clients.

355
Justice consistent with “The Spirit” of the Constitution will only be achieved when administers and
enforcers are consistent with the Constitution competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with
fortitude and conviction to the safety and well being of every individual equally and fairly consistent with
democracy and the guaranteed Charter rights.

As usual when they address the problems they do not address the root of the problem for obvious reason
they are the root of it and they do not bring the matter forward to the public until they can find a way to
appear innocent and get them selves a raise because they do not do anything unless it benefits them and
their conspirator friends.

It appears the lawyers assigned to the legal aid cases are paid between $73- $92 an hour which has been
considered not enough by lawyers where many refuse to take such cases obviously being the more
successful ones which ultimately means the legal aid cases are not as well represented being inconsistent
with the Constitution and every individual’s guaranteed rights of equal protection and benefit in all matters
before and under the law.

The problem is endemic where money is the culprit and the only interests of the members of the Law
Society where justice is impossible given their inherent attitudes.

University of Toronto law professor Michael Trebilcock suggested that anything less than $110 an hour
seriously risks destroying the private bar’s commitment to serving legal aid clients.

How obvious is the seriousness when the middle class cannot even access the system due to costs?

All along the middle class who can not afford to access the system them selves have been made to finance
the legal aid system and of course the majority of the criminal elements defence where often is the case
they find themselves financing their own lawyer against their adversary whose lawyer they are also
contributing to through taxes..

When you look into it further you can see that by their unscrupulous initiatives attentive to their own
benefits instead of benefitting society with their unfair distribution of the countries wealth have created the
poverty creating the need to publicly aid them in housing ….whatever where ultimately the burden is
placed on the middle class.

Where there is disparity, hopelessness and despair is bred forcing people into the criminal world that just
happens to be conducive to the wellbeing of the members of the Law Society who thrive off all the
symptoms they themselves created being the root of society’s woes.

Consistently they go after more money as if that will help to lower the costs where they will not look at the
issue sanely because that is adverse to their purpose of the acquisition of money whenever and wherever
opportunity knocks?

Attorney General Chris Bentley said that making going to court cheaper rather than increasing legal aid,
might improve access to the legal system, especially on the civil side.

No matter how they look at it and how they would like it to appear to the public is irrelevant and invariably
they are unscrupulous people with no intention of benefitting the public and this demonstration is just

356
another of their “Benevolence, Righteousness and Morality” ploys intended to keep their conspiracy alive
and the public barefoot and pregnant so to speak.

You have to remember these people are not amateurs but professionally trained and experienced con artists
and the bottom line is they refuse to deal with the issues presented to them published on the Charter
Democracy Force web site for obvious reason that they cannot without going public implicating
themselves in the conspiracy which the evidence will invariably do when I manage to get it to the public
without the cooperation of the media such as the Toronto Star who have already implicated themselves
over and over again aiding them in their manipulated cover-ups.

The article in the Saturday Star July 26 2008 contains the evidence they have been long aware of the
excessive court costs due their unscrupulous ways prohibitive to the middle class that they must
persistently cover up with the humongous waste of the taxpayer’s money to societies lament.

These people are all the same and always have been and will do anything and everything to prevent the
ideology of “The Spirit” of the Constitution to actually take hold as they demonstrated long ago by nailing
Jesus to a cross.

When they did not kill “The Spirit” they recognized its power and harnessed it for themselves having the
people believe they are with “The Spirit” when they are obviously not.

Manipulating words in consistent deceit and prevarication attests to the fact when their actions are adverse
to them.

Eventually as history attests they will have the root of the problem covered up appearing to be responsible
people increasing the wages of the unscrupulous members of the Law Society humongously detrimental to
taxpayer’s and society as a whole with people confident they are being taken care of oblivious to the
reality that the members of the law Society will continue in their unscrupulous ways forever and ever in an
attempt to take them for whatever they can get away with being just about anything in a system
particularly designed to do so.

The Toronto Star who has also been provided the evidence published on the web site have now implicated
themselves along with the Attorney General Chris Bentley and Chief Justice Warren Winkler who admit
they are aware of that which I charged as to why I have not yet acquired the justice due me in the matters
of the criminal acts of fraud because under their watch and their predecessors have allowed the legal
system to advance to excessive costs prohibitive to the middle class such as myself and obviously knowing
the true root of the problem as defined in the evidence make a feeble attempt with the cooperation of the
Toronto Star and presumably the other media to bury the truth by presenting it in a manner that will go
over the heads of the people and appear to be dealt with responsibly and obviously will be successful as the
media will not inform the people of the underlying truth.
The majority of the recipients of the commentary of the Charter Democracy Force will not receive the
following, which is the nature of posting to groups not conducive to graphics, however you will find this
report in its entirety by clicking on the link http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force-
boomerangs and going to the RCMP page where you will find this document DictatorshipJuly292008
providing the death blow to dictatorship that can only strike as hard and deep as you are willing to exert.

357
Charter Democracy Force Boomerangs Tyrannical Democracy Constitution Scam
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force-boomerangs
Site now abandoned and archived

Analysis of Charter Democracy Force web site evidence

The government’s documents appear to be tyrannical in nature and their modus operandi confirms it

Deciphering The Law consistent with Democracy

Exposes tyrannical establishment consistent with the unscrupulous nature of the Law Society of
Upper Canada

Warning: What you are about to read is the unbiased common sense interpretation of the
Constitution attentive to integrity whereas the modus operandi of the establishment has been well
documented proving they are a tyrannical force of professional charlatans specialists in the fine art of
deception and prevarication.

All federal government departments and agencies are advised by the office of the Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada and all provincial government departments and agencies are advised by the
office of the Attorney General.

On January 22 2007 the DOJ, Department of Justice wrote in response to evidence provided on the Charter
Democracy Force web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force stating Parliament
enacts federal law such as the Constitution and the provincial governments are required to administer and
enforce the Constitution.

So, the evidence shows the Ontario Government refuse to put a modus operandi in place capable of
supporting the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and the federal government that made the guarantee
refuse to make the Ontario Government support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights claiming they
have autonomy and the federal government has no authority to intervene.

The evidence proves beyond all doubt the entire Canadian legal system is operated by members of the Law
Societies who are not required to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and
evidence in support of complaints against their members is irrelevant because all departments and agencies
set up to address complaints from the public are not intended to actually deal with the complaints but to
quash them providing the people a false sense of security believing they are there for the people, just as
they are led to believe their representatives are there for the people.

A book by University of British Columbia history professor refers to a book by Edmund Morgan who
asserts the success of all forms of government is dependent on their adeptness to deceive the people and in
a democracy it is necessary for the people to believe they have a voice and the representatives are the
people, absolutely contrary to the concept of democracy.

The evidence irrefutably proves this is the ideology of the Canadian governments.

They have woven a web of deceit deeply embedded in the entire legal system for the express benefit of the
members of the Law Society having ulterior motive and opportunity to ransack the people of the Lower

358
Tier creating an illegitimate legal system inconsistent with the Constitution and of no force or effect and
their power will collapse once the truth is provided to the people.
Constitution Act, 1982
Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General “of Ontario defines that most elusive concept –the rule of
law- a well established legal principle that protects the individual and society as a whole.

So in the very fist line of the Charter we see a conflict or inconsistency that left unattended would complicate the
system and compromise efficiency and cost effectiveness whereas the supremacy of God has priority and for a
valid interpretation attentive to consistency with democracy we have accepted “The Spirit” of the Constitution
to be the Golden Rule being the summarization of the aspirations attributed to God. “Do unto others as you
would have them do unto you”

You will note “The Spirit” is consistent with the verbiage of the Charter and particularly conducive to peace and
harmony among all people being equally fair to everyone consistent with democracy.

Democracy
Democratic system, democratic state, democratic organization, parliamentary government, social
equality, equality, egalitarianism

Egalitarianism
Parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality

Justice
Fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even-handed, fair dealing, honesty, integrity

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms


1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject
only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic
society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom
of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of
communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied
may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate
and just in the circumstances.
31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.
32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters
within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest
Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the
authority of the legislature of each province.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

359
Attentive to sanity the Constitution must be unambiguous and consistently interpreted so as to be
consistently administered and enforced to ensure every individual’s equality rights of protection and
benefits are consistently supported and without consistency it would be impossible to determine which
laws are inconsistent and of no force or effect as to their inconsistencies.

My favourite saying “If you do not know what you are trying to achieve, how will you
know when you are done?”
With common sense to safety and wellbeing of the Canadian people the only valid interpretation of the
Constitution must be done in “The Spirit” of the Golden Rule where the Constitution recognizes the
supremacy of God.

To administer and enforce the law consistent with the Constitution the personnel must be in, of and with
“The Spirit” in continuity competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the
support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

Every government department, agency …whatever must ensure they interpret their mandate consistent
with “The Spirit” of the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights ensuring
continuity to that resolve.

When laws are enacted they can not possibly address every situation.
The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada Lawyers Rules of Conduct.

(103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit as
well as in the letter.

When they are applied in performance of one’s duty the final result must be consistent with “The Spirit”
and where conflict is discovered it must be duly recorded and immediate initiatives taken to amend the
inconsistency so as to ensure every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights are consistently protected.
Every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equality belong to them as an arm or a leg whereas they are
precisely the same as yours and mine where that can be no doubt as to the meaning of “The Spirit”, the
Golden Rule” stated by Confucius 551 BC – 479 BC born to poverty and rose to dine with kings who left
to walk the land amongst the people as a philosopher informing the people what he had come to know
necessary for peace and harmony among all people. “Do not impose on others what you would not wish
for yourself” paraphrased by Jesus “ Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

Credence must be to that which is least likely to be mistaken by humankind.


So there you have “The Spirit” of the Constitution, which must be consistently administered and enforced
unbiased, conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

To ensure the people understand the law and comply it is imperative the administers and enforcers of the
law are in, of and with “The Spirit”, competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude
and conviction to the support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights with priority one
administering punishment attentive to deterrence whereas a standard punishment for a crime may be a
$5000 fine, pocket change to one and perhaps 3 years savings to another which would deter another but
not one so one’s punishment must be significantly greater to accomplish equality ensuring the populace
due diligence is being applied to ensure their protection.

360
Fundamental to human reality is our common needs and vulnerabilities, with relative emotions where it is
incomprehensible that one would not know the difference between good and bad and what is expected of
each person in a moral society consistent with the Constitution where immorality is forbidden but exists
being the purpose of law to eradicate immoral persuasion nipping it in the bud where it is easiest to deal
with attentive to prevention maintaining every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection
and benefit secure.

It is all a matter of common sense that maintains sanity secure.

I can not overemphasize the necessity of the government personnel to be competent responsible and
irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction to administer and enforce the law consistently
consistent with “The Spirit” of the Constitution.

Attached to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights is the responsibility to be consistently in


compliance with “The Spirit” of the Constitution where with the presumption of innocence goes the
responsibility to act consistent with the presumption and cooperate with the law enforcement for with the
guarantee every effort to due diligence must be applied to the support of it where common sense must
prevail.

When reasonable evidence has been provided to the police suggesting one is in noncompliance with “The
Spirit” of the law an innocent person presumed innocent would cooperate with the police to prove their
innocence, plain and simple and a guilty person of course would not and giving priority to the safety and
wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed the police must not be hindered in performance of their duty to
protect us all, as simple as that and therefore must be permitted to search wherever reasonably necessary to
accomplish the goal, and when evidence of another crime is revealed it must be followed up where it leads.

It is after all for the common good of every individual in a moral society.

The immoral element do not belong in a moral society governed by “The Spirit” of the Constitution where
due the fact they are known to exist they have burdened the taxpayer requiring them to finance a system
structured for the distinct purpose to eradicate them from society as quickly, efficiently and cost effectively
as can possibly be done where the intention of the Constitution is to protect every individual equally from
the immoral element not the other way around as the members of the Law Society would have us believe.
Hardly do we finance a system to protect the immoral we financed to eradicate.

Fair is fair and they have been provided fair warning immorality will not be tolerated and to maintain
consistency the Constitution must be enforced consistently so as to demonstrate that immorality will not be
tolerated.

The immoral are difficult enough to catch without aiding them every, which way when they are finally
caught.

Many victims lay in their wake and each time they get away with it their confidence increases, and they
spread the word of the incompetence of the system and the criminal element flourishes as do the members
of the Law Society to the humongous detriment of the people of the Lower Tier.

There must be a consistent war on immorality or it will spread like weeds and we are not talking about
people with different uniforms we are talking about people who are not in uniform with a moral society

361
without uniforms to identify them looking the same as you or me where we can only identify them by their
actions that are not consistent with “The Spirit” where they commit their immoral deeds under the cover of
darkness even if it is in broad daylight.

The only thing that separates them from the rest of us is evidence pointing in their direction and every
effort must be made to follow up on it to prove them innocent or guilty to either clear them so we can get
immediately on the trail of the real criminal or commence proceedings to get the guilty on side with us by
putting them in a rehabilitation plan.

A person who will not permit a search under any circumstances is not in “The Spirit” of the Constitution
for any sane person knows every individual’s guaranteed equal rights of protection is dependent on a
consistency to the endeavour where only with complete cooperation can we ever hope to win the war
where the uncooperative only serve to increase the costs to all taxpayers and hinder the process.

The members of the Law Societies are well aware and they do make every effort to hinder the process for
their ultimate benefit and our humongous detriment.

Working together for a common cause can only serve to bring us together and separate the immoral from
the masses.
What better cause could there possibly be as our taxes would be destined to go down and our personal
safety and wellbeing destined to go up.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Dictatorship
Despotism, autocracy, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, tyranny, repression, absolute rule, one-party rule

Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General


These were written prior to the 1982 enactment of the Constitution yet published on the Ontario web site
today containing many inconsistencies with the Constitution ultimately resulting in a dictatorship as the
guardian of the rule of law has a traditional responsibility and although he can advise the police it is up the
police to make the charges but ultimately it is up to him whether or not to proceed.

The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and as the "guardian of the public interest".

By the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site we can see the modus operandi
adopted by the office of the Attorney General is consistent with the inconsistencies to the Charter and
inconsistent with the consistencies of the Charter

The rule of law

That most elusive concept-the rule of law- a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define that
protects the individual and society as a whole.

362
The rule of law attests to the unscrupulous nature of the author or authors of the “Roles and
Responsibilities of the Attorney General” that were written prior to the 1982 enactment of the Constitution
with many inconsistencies with the Constitution.

It is a well established legal principle obviously known to the members of the legal profession but hardly
known by the general populace or they would have rose up against it long ago obviously not competent to
support the individual and society as a whole relative to democracy as defined

Democracy
Democratic system, democratic state, democratic organization, parliamentary government, social
equality, equality, egalitarianism

Egalitarianism
Parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality

If the legal profession can not structure a rule of law concept that is not elusive and not hard to easily
define, who can?

Why is it an elusive concept hard to easily define and once they realized it why was it not amended?

Obviously it was intended for ulterior purpose other than to protect the people and society as a whole.

The legal profession is not in it for the love of justice and obviously it provides them humongous
advantage to mug society and most decidedly not fair, adverse to the concept of Democracy

However it is consistent with the book by Edmund Morgan who asserts the success of any form of
government is dependent on its adeptness to deceive the people and sure enough they believe they live in a
democracy and the populous of the world believe Canada is a democracy.

The Attorney General is appointed by the Prime Minister and therefore the system is founded on a
Puppet Dictatorship
31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all
matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory
and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in
respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.

The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” would have us believe the various sectors of
government have different interests within the legal system being of a combative nature inconsistent with
the Constitution which reality attests whereas his legitimate roles and responsibilities in “The Spirit” of the
Constitution is to ensure the entire system runs like clockwork consistent to the safety and wellbeing of
every individual as guaranteed by the Charter.

This requires him to assure the entire system is staffed with competent responsible irreproachable
personnel in continuity with fortitude and conviction to the support of consistency with “The Spirit”
of the Constitution.

363
It is either stated or implied that accountability is and must be enforced to ensure responsibility is
instilled within every individual who is required by law to be responsible for themselves to be consistent
with the Constitution and to ensure it, it is the ultimate purpose of the legal system where we must all be
in, of and with “The Spirit” for the concept to work or they in “The Spirit” are humongously disadvantaged
as is the reality today under an illegitimate system fixed by the authors of the “Roles and Responsibilities
of the Attorney General”, Parliament and Government of Canada and the legislature and government of
each province who do not have the authority to do so who must be in, of and with “The Spirit” of the
Constitution but decidedly are not with the irrefutable proof being the “Roles and Responsibilities of the
Attorney General” the Ontario Government has published on their web site along with everything they do
in reality.

They are of the absurd opinion they are not required to be responsible

Can you believe the very people financed by the people to ensure every individual is responsible in, of and
with “The Spirit” of the Constitution do not feel they are responsible to demonstrate due diligence in
structuring a legal system with a modus operandi staffed with competent responsible irreproachable
personnel with fortitude and conviction in continuity (working together) with the ultimate goal to ensure
the system is infallible.

The ultimate result is reality itself.

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception

There are near 7 billion people on this planet with unique perceptions being the cause of the chaotic state
of the world and the Government of Canada is responsible to ensure the minds of the Canadian populace
are in of and with “The Spirit” of the Constitution whereas every government of the world has the similar
responsibility for their own populace where “The Spirit” is the only Spirit when possessed by all of us that
will guarantee world peace and harmony among all people.

Reality shows all forms of governments strive for their personal success in complete disregard for the
populace of the world as they use them in every which they can in their unrelenting persistence founded on
deception and prevarication in pursuance of power and wealth they need to acquire more power and wealth
to satiate their insatiable lusts for wealth and power where the winners will have a few moments of the
ultimate pleasure of knowing they are the victors just before the ultimate knowledge sets upon them where
there is nothing left to use their ultimate power and wealth for selfish benefit being the irony of it all that
did them in as the wealth that gave them the power was destroyed in their venture to acquire it.

It is the foreseeable future if left steadfast on course that will invariably bring the populace of the
world onside in, of and with “The Spirit” where urgency is of the essence to the survival of
humankind.

Never has opportunity presented itself so convincingly as to the fork in the road where maintaining
the course is suicide to all and diversionary tactics must and will be taken to avoid the certain
disastrous collision with reality that will continue with or without us and most assuredly with us if
we depart from the norm instigated by the powers that be for their own selfish purpose which they
have irrefutably documented.

There is one thing for certain we can all depend on in the reality of humankind, our individual
attentiveness to selfishness where only when success to that endeavor is accomplished can we entertain the
364
concept of helping others where invariably if we cannot help ourselves we will never be in the most
enviable position.

The governments of the world know well of this concept which they use consistently in the Upper Tier
they created where the wannabe powers that be vie for the support of the affluent and influential who
scratch their backs and they reciprocate in kind providing the humongous advantage wealth and power has
over the majority of the populous where power is a necessity of democracy to assure democracy exists but
unfortunately their intent is not dedicated to democracy as they get caught up in the struggle for power and
wealth where perhaps we could foolishly presume they have good intentions if ever they achieve the
ultimate power and wealth and can afford to be fair with the remainder of the populous that were not lost
in the devastation that lay in their wake.

It is the selfishness of the powers that be which we must and will count on as they have been provided the
opportunity to make things right with the world and we have been provided the opportunity to make sure
that they do as we take responsibility for our selfishness and make them responsible for theirs as we hold
them accountable to be responsible by use of “The Spirit” in, of and with “The Spirit” of the Constitution
where it is either stated or implied the administers and enforcers must be in, of and with “The Spirit”
where their refusal to be responsible is in direct violation and adverse to the concept of “The Spirit” and
responsibility can only be ensured by competent responsible irreproachable personnel with fortitude and
conviction in continuity of “The Spirit” which either states or implies a structured system attentive to due
diligence to a modus operandi attentive to due punishment where priority one is to deterrence where
punishment is a must in the assurance of a system we trust where emphasis must be to the soundness of the
foundation it is built on being the Constitution: Document where the Establishment is and must be the
Constitution personified where inconsistencies to “The Spirit” is intolerable where the strength of the
Constitution is only as strong as its weakest link and obviously due their refusal to punish the personnel
who refuse to accept their responsibility is endemic obviously due their belief instilled by the illegitimate
legal system clearly documented by themselves in the Constitution: Document and the “Roles and
Responsibilities of the Attorney General” where they even believe they have a right to be irresponsible and
have fixed the system to protect them from “The Spirit” of the Constitution that is conducive to the safety
and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter.

They have used “The Spirit” which is ultimately the spirit of God in the same manner the religious leaders
have used “The Spirit” to control the minds of the people having the people believe they are of, in and with
“The Spirit” where everything in reality convincingly proves they are not since the day they nailed Jesus to
the cross.

Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General


Inconsistencies and consistencies in of and with “The Spirit”

The Attorney General has a unique role to play as a Minister.

One part of the Attorney General's role is that of a Cabinet Minister. In this capacity the Minister is
responsible for representing the interests and perspectives of the Ministry at Cabinet, while simultaneously
representing the interests and perspectives of Cabinet and consequently the Government to the Ministry
and the Ministry's communities of interest.

365
The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming from
this role are unlike those of any other Cabinet member. The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and
as the "guardian of the public interest".

Much has been written on the subject of ministerial responsibilities and the unique role of the Attorney
General.

There are various components of the Attorney General's role. The Attorney General has unique
responsibilities to the Crown, the courts, the Legislature and the executive branch of government. While
there are different emphases and nuances attached to these there is a general theme throughout all the
various aspects of the Attorney General's responsibilities that the office has a constitutional and
traditional responsibility beyond that of a political minister.

The statutory responsibilities of the office are found in section 5 of the Ministry of the Attorney General
Act. Section 5 states:

The Attorney General,


(a) is the Law Officer of the Executive Council;
(b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law;
(c) shall superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario;
(d) shall perform the duties and have the powers that belong to the Attorney General and Solicitor General
of England by law and usage, so far as those powers and duties are applicable to Ontario, and also shall
perform the duties and powers that, until the Constitution Act, 1867 came into effect, belonged to the
offices of the Attorney General and Solicitor General in the provinces of Canada and Upper Canada and
which, under the provisions of that Act, are within the scope of the powers of the Legislature;
(e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and upon
all matters of law referred to him or her by the Government;
(f) shall advise the Government upon all matters of a legislative nature and superintend all Government
measures of a legislative nature;
(g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law connected with
such ministries and agency;
(h) shall conduct and regulate all litigation for and against the Crown or any ministry or agency of
government in respect of any subject within the authority or jurisdiction of the Legislature;
(i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices;
(j) shall perform such other functions as are assigned to him or her by the Legislature or by the Lieutenant
Governor in Council. "

What follows is an overview of the various components of the Attorney General's roles and
responsibilities, primarily as outlined in the Act.

Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a))


The role of chief law officer might be referred to as the Attorney General's overall responsibility as the
independent legal advisor to the Cabinet - and some have even suggested that the role possibly extends to
the Legislature as well. The importance of the independence of the role is fundamental to the position and
well established in common law, statutes and tradition.
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily
define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and
safeguards personal liberties.
366
The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained
and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.

In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General's
policy advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet. The Attorney General's
legal advice or constitutional advice should not be lightly disregarded. The Attorney General's policy
advice has the same weight as that of other ministers.

Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d))


One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General's role is the responsibility for criminal
prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section 92 gives the
provinces authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justice and thereby
gives the provincial Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal Code.

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General
and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether or
not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the prosecution
should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.

It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry out the
Minister's criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political
pressures. The Attorney General's responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken -
and seen to be undertaken - on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations.
Whether to initiate or stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy. This responsibility
has been characterized as a matter of the Attorney General acting as the Queen's Attorney - not as a
Minister of the government of the day.

This is not to suggest that decisions regarding criminal prosecutions are made in a complete vacuum. A
wide range of policy considerations may be weighed in executing this responsibility, and the Attorney
General may choose to consult the Cabinet on some of these considerations. However any decisions
relating to the conduct of individual prosecutions must be the Attorney General's alone and independent of
the traditional Cabinet decision making process. In practice, in the vast majority of cases, these decisions
are made by the Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys.

An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting criminal
prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which includes not only
the community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a distinct responsibility to
the court to present all the credible evidence available.

The responsibility is to present the case fairly - not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of
criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One of the
Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the public in
understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.

Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature, for
decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the
prosecution is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicae rule
bars any comment on a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub judicae rule
strictly prohibits the Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions that are before the courts. Given
367
the stature of the Attorney General's position, any public comment coming from the office would be seen as
an attempt to influence the case.

Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individual criminal
cases, such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political interference.
Accordingly, it is traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of the Attorney
General's agents, the Crown Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where the public would
expect the Attorney General to be briefed.

Legislative Responsibilities (s. 5(e) and (f))

The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These
responsibilities have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in
accordance with principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) above). This is obviously an
important and broad area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise on the
constitutionality and legality of legislation.

The Attorney General's legislative responsibilities are played out in a variety roles. The Office of
Legislative Counsel reports to the Attorney General. Legislative Counsel plays a key role in ensuring the
legal integrity of Government legislation. Although the Legislative Counsel's reporting relationship to the
Attorney General does allow the Attorney General to provide guidance and set standards, individual
pieces of legislation are drafted on instructions from client ministries and are not within the sole control of
Legislative Counsel or the Attorney General. It should also be noted that Legislative Counsel also has a
direct responsibility to the Legislature as the Office also drafts all private member's bills.

The Attorney General has a further role to play as part of whatever Cabinet Committee is formed to review
legislation and regulations. Here the Minister has an opportunity to comment on the technical issues
related to legislation and regulations prior to Cabinet consideration.

The Attorney General's role on legislative matters is as an adviser to the Cabinet. Although unlikely,
Cabinet could, in theory, receive the Attorney General's legal opinion on legislation and choose to
disregard it. The Attorney General's role is not independent of Cabinet decision making as in the area of
criminal prosecutions. As was noted earlier, the Attorney General must make careful distinctions about the
legal opinions and policy or political preferences being offered about legislation.

Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d))


In addition to the specific responsibilities to conduct civil litigation on behalf of the Government and its
agencies (s. 5(h)), the Attorney General has broader litigation responsibilities flowing from the historical
powers of the Attorney General referred to in s. 5(d) of the Act. These powers are based on the Crown's
parens patriae (parental) authority. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only to conduct
litigation in cases directly affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases where there is
a clear matter of public interest or public rights at stake.

This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is well and
independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter challenges to
legislation, even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionally protected
rights.

368
Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c))

A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice in the
province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison with
the judiciary.

Given the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, the responsibility for courts
administration is often a very sensitive and delicate issue. Great care and respect for the principles of
judicial independence must be exercised in this area.

It is impossible to maintain consistency with the Constitution by permitting the administers and enforcers,
the members of the Law Society to maintain tradition of their unscrupulous traditions that are inconsistent
with the Constitution: Document, which is adverse to sanity and the very reason the Constitution is a
necessity of a moral society.

Consistent with the purpose of law is the consistent need to enforce it consistent with the law, which is the
catalyst to a responsible society where contrary to the belief of the government personnel and that which
they would have the people believe is the truth that a Constitution enforced with nothing but hot air by
irresponsible people for ulterior purpose will only stay afloat as long as the invisible veneer containing it is
not pierced.

The invisible veneer is immediately visable to people in, of and with “The Spirit” adept to reason and
thought and what they see is a humongous blimp with very little room for another patch where invariably
any more hot air will burst the balloon that protects these unscrupulous detriments to the populous that has
shadowed the people of the Lower Tiers and the sun will shine on the people to see light for evermore

Sure this could be a fairytale, which it ultimately is and will persist if the present reality is permitted to
illegally exist where first the people must see the light if they are to realistically attend to it in quest of the
Ideal which is the consistency of “The Spirit” conducive to the Ideal of the world.

Canada has the opportunity to show the world the efficiency and cost effectiveness of consistently
administering and enforcing the Constitution in, of and with “The Spirit” the world populous obviously
know to be true to peace and harmony among all people.

The government also knows and made it apparent in the Constitution, which they refuse to support for
reasons obvious to the unscrupulous nature of the members of the Law Society, which they adamantly
confirmed in the 2 part, Law Society of Upper Canada document where their confession is absolute proof
they do not give a damn about the populous as they strive for the power and wealth in progressive steps in
pursuance of the ultimate power and wealth indifferent to the safety and wellbeing of every individual
consistent with democracy guaranteed by the Charter they refuse to support as is the reality we exist.

Reality is the product of their unscrupulous endeavours, which all evidence attests against them and
invariably they will debate their right to do it, which will be their last hoorah as they bite themselves firmly
in the ass as the Charter Democracy Force Boomerangs Tyrannical Democracy Constitution Scam
refusing to play silly bugger any longer
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force-boomerangs

Frank Gallagher
Manager
369
Charter Democracy Force

PS
The people will rise when they are as sane as they proclaim to be.

There is nothing stopping them but themselves and their conviction to insanity unbeknownst to them until
now. Now we will see if knowledge is relevant and plays any significant role in the realm of all nature
where humans are purported to be the most intelligent life form
I have attached a copy of an e-mail sent to the Toronto Star with commentary on their article headlining
the Saturday Star July 26 2008 that clearly indicates the nature of the members of the Law Society who
have allowed inconsistencies with “The Spirit” which they adamantly admit, where money is their intent
not justice as they casually admit their legal system is incompetent to support the individuals guaranteed
Charter rights of equal protection and well being and if the people do not cough up enough money to keep
the unscrupulous members of the Law Society in the luxurious lifestyle they have come to know they will
allow the system to get even worse.

Of course the entire concept is founded on the people believing they serve society in any way, shape or
form, which is their forte as professional charlatans of deception and prevarication who have induced the
cooperation of the media to their side.

To meet the terms of the verbiage of the Charter consistent with “The Spirit” of the Constitution the legal
system must be funded by the taxpayer, which must be operated conducive to the safety and wellbeing of
every individual as guaranteed by the Charter in efficient and cost effective manner whereby they have
admitted their incompetency to do so and admitted they will continue to compromise the safety and
wellbeing of every individual until the taxpayer coughs up more money for the members of the Law
Societies which is their only purpose where Justice is just a façade that catches our interest and willing
contribute to unknowing that is not their intent.

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception


Every individual has a unique perception which they are responsible to ensure is true to themselves.

370
The following is a copy of a document I e-mailed to the Toronto Star July 27 2008

Change to a legitimate legal system consistent with the


Constitution is always possible if we do not mind paying the
members of the Law Society what ever they want to go legal
As I have stated many times the legal system provided by the
unscrupulous members of the Law Society is illegal consistently
inconsistent with democracy and the Constitution absolutely not
conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. Such a
tangled web of deceit that it simply costs far too much for the
average person to access leaving them vulnerable to the criminal
element who thrive off them and invariably expand into the big
time where the criminal lawyers feast to the humongous detriment
to society.
Chaos is left in their wake until they are finally brought to court
where justice is not obtainable administered by members of the
Law Society who are first and foremost in it for the money which
sucks society dry creating the symptoms they thrive off where the
modus operandi of the legal system is specially designed for the
luxurious benefit of the members of the Law Society predictable
to assure victims necessary for their success while having the
nerve to charge the public protection money for something they
never intended to provide. Who will protect us from them?
They are all set up with their bibs on waiting to address the
symptoms of their deliberately not putting a system in place
capable of protecting the people as guaranteed by the Charter.

The people may be fooled but the criminal element is not, quite
aware of what they can get away with especially since the people
find it cheaper and less aggravating to let the criminals go writing
off their losses rather than going after them throwing away more
money in the inane court system.

It works for the criminals and the criminal lawyers and the
taxpayers continue to pay for nothing but a belief that they are
being protected.

All the woes with the legal system are obviously due the fact the
members of the Law Society are not required to give a damn
about the people’s rights so they obviously do not.

Every individual is guaranteed equal protection and benefit and


the only way that can be achieved is through taxation.

The only reason the legal system is so costly is due their


deliberate incompetence to structure a simple legitimate system in
“The Spirit” of the Constitution consistent with the Golden Rule.

Now they want a raise for the pathetic excuse they call a legal
system.
The taxpayer has a material stake in the whole damn system.
371
Lawyer pay significantly decreased urged.

It is absurd that they get paid at all for the


illegitimate legal system they operate in
designed to ransack society.

The number one problem is dealing with the people who need
legal aid.
The countries wealth is not fairly distributed creating the
illegitimate two tier system in the first place with minimum
wages far too low to the ultimate benefit of the wealthy who do
not pay their fair share of taxes having the advantage of write
offs and safe havens, which the hard working people cannot
access simply because they haven’t the money to invest.
The rich are encouraged to invest getting richer just by doing it
in the money they save from not paying their fair share of taxes,
which ultimately puts the burden on the middle class over and
over again.
When people live under the poverty line or even above their
housing and whatever needs to be subsidized by the taxpayer
who is already taxed too much trying to pay their way and the
wealthy too which is simply absurd.

It is absolutely ridiculous that the people with the most money


already comfortable have the laws designed for their benefit
where the government must be impartial uninfluenced by the
affluent and influential.
Every individual must be influential in matters of law where
every individual is guaranteed equality consistent with
democracy.
Can that be true? The problem addressed is the same one I have been
addressing for three years and I consider this admittance even though
Make the system legitimate and efficient the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site
like it should be and make it free through www.cdf.name provided him and his refusal to respond was
taxes which is the only legitimate way admittance enough.
and cut lawyers wages because it will not
be as challenging to do it right and the
ultimate benefit will be justice.
The unscrupulous members of the Law Society as demonstrated in the
2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document have to be nothing else
when the Attorney General (member of the Law Society) who advises
all Ontario Government departments and agencies would not sign on
to giving the middle class access to the system.

Obviously if the low income people are provided free lawyers the
middleclass are paying the greatest support for them and yet they
cannot afford lawyers themselves.
Why is he even discussing improving access to the
system when we are guaranteed it by the Charter
The system as it stands not only makes them less equal to the wealthy
with no mention of money? We taxpayers pay for an who have humongous advantage over them but the lower wage earners
efficient legal system and they design an efficient who have already burdened them through no fault of their own also
system for their benefit and say too bad if you have the advantage of a free lawyer where in either case it is futile to
cannot afford to pay. Their illegitimate attitude
venture into court against either of them if they care to go against the372
cannot stop and will not stop. We must stop them.
odds of getting justice in the first place with the present justice system.
This suggests the poor are getting
the least cunning lawyers and
above all $73 - $92 is absurd for
so many reasons published on the
Charter Democracy Force web
sites and obviously the
government who has no qualms
with the poverty level and the
starving would have some nerve to
even suggest they are any where
near worth $73-$92 to rip the
people off when they could be
ripped off for much less if there
was no law at all.

It is absolutely absurd that we pay


the government to protect us from
people precisely like themselves.

Like any business, more money please, it is a natural phenomenon inherent to every individual.

The problem is it is all one sided where the people of the Lower Tiers most assuredly need more money but
have nobody on their side to stand up for them.

The consequences is the governments who are supposed to be on their side are only concerned about their
own side and having the advantage they take what they want and the people of the Lower Tier who
desperately need the raise end up in getting a decrease as their taxes continue to go up, increasing taxes
throughout all of society with consumer products over inflated with taxes causing more and more of the
middle class to slide closer to the poverty line and they already there in hopelessness and despair end up in
the bottom of the criminal element working their way up to the top leaving chaos in their wake and more and
more need public housing and aid hitting the middle class more all conducive to self destruction with the
minority high and dry, the lawyers plenty of work due the incompetence of the system which they want big
bucks for their services.
Step back, get out of town before we run you out.

There is a place for insanity but not in the legal system that must be consistent with the Constitution
conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights with competent responsible, irreproachable
personnel with fortitude and conviction prerequisite.

This not addressed to lawyers who obviously are devoid of common sense and “The Spirit” of the law, which
is evident in everything they do for they simply can not help it any more than your average venomous snake
spider or scorpion.
At least they do not go looking for people to bite or create snake pits for people to fall in and in fact they are
373
conducive to society.
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]
Sent: July 27, 2008 2:04 AM
To: 'city@thestar.ca'; 'lettertoed@thestar.ca'; 'city@thestar.ca'
Subject:

July 26 2008

Toronto Star

Joe Hall and Tracey Tyler

Legal aid urged for middle class


Re: Ontario report recommends lowering barriers that restrict access to justice

Please see attachment and web site

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force-boomerangs

As you people know I have been providing you irrefutable evidence of Government Organized Crime
of corruption and conspiracy for at least a couple of years now and this topic is just one of the many
charges I have made but instead of exposing them to stand up for the people to get the necessary
changes made quickly and to put a stop to the corruption you write this to help them sneak it past
the public as if it was okay for them to have let this happen and when they get past this they will just
carry on organized crime as usual and better off for it as usual.

This is their modus operandi glossing over their conspiracy while coming out smelling like roses and
of course they could not do it with out your cooperation.

I have written about how they blocked a Public Inquiry when the Standing Committee on Public
Accounts looking into the RCMP pension fund scandal was linked to the DOJ.

Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day announces it would cost the taxpayer too much for a Public
Inquiry when they could deal with the matter internally obviously meaning they can cover it up if
they do not let it get out to the people and you people just go along with it.

When the Task Force Report came out in late December, purposely in the festive season to let it slide
that there was no mention of the DOJ in the report you people let it slide. I mean you cannot possibly
be that dumb to not know what is going on and it certainly would have been a good story and it
would have been a nice Christmas present for the people to get the truth instead of a manipulation.

You should know that it is the Attorney General who advises all the government department and
agencies including the Ombudsman and of course is involved with assigning their mandate with very
limited authority according to the correspondence in the Ombudsman document on my web site but
they publish on the Ombudsman web site that they are the group to end all government corruption.
They claim they are independent of the government yet the Attorney General obviously advises them
accounting for the ridiculous responses I received from them. There was the same consistency from
all government departments that responded and they surely cannot all be that dumb, but if they are
there is a serious story there.

There is a story that goes to the DOJ who refuses to support the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights even though the federal government made the guarantee.

374
There is a story of how the entire Ontario Government refuses to back the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights and that is obviously because the Attorney General advises them all but it does not
explain why the Attorney General does not back the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

Of course we know why, because they never intended to back the guarantee and it is all just a scam
right from the very first line of the Charter.

“Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of
law”

The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” defines that most elusive concept-the rule of
law- a well established legal principle but hard to easily define that protects the individual and society
as a whole. He is responsible to be the guardian of the rule of law and the guardian of the public
interest.

The rule of law was obviously incompetent to protect the public interest prior to the 1982 enactment
and most certainly is incompetent to protect the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

When one asks why was it incompetent prior to the Charter we can see there is only one logical
reason to scam the people because they obviously weren’t interested in amending the rule of law to
make it competent and as guardian of the rule of law it appears he is not permitted to change it but
fend off anyone who would attempt to do so.

When you read the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document and see that they adamantly state
or imply their members are not required to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights it explains why they do not. When you read they do not look at the supporting evidence to my
complaint against one of their members and yet take 2 months to find him in compliance with their
standards you have to know that all they are there for is to quash complaints and protect their
members.

It is incomprehensible that their members hold every position in the government but it explains why
the Ombudsman and the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing never took the evidence into
account when they made their ignorant decisions.

Obviously to be consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights you need competent responsible irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to the
endeavour but ultimately the Attorney General is responsible for the government departments and
agencies as it states so in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General”

So obviously he is responsible for the inaccessible legal system, the topic at hand. That is what I
stated along time ago and the fact is he is responsible for it being so expensive, simply because that
is their intention to benefit the members of the Law Society and why the rule of law remains today to
be that most elusive concept hard to easily define that protects the individual and society as a whole
and when you put it all together it explains why society has so many problems and for that the
lawyers want a raise.

There is a serious mental health issue here and I do not know if it is embedded in the system or the
people for allowing it to happen.

Of course the people do not know what is going on although they believe they do with the media
making every effort to get the top stories out except of course the true story as we see from the
Saturday column.

375
With all the evidence I provided the Attorney General about the legal system not being accessible to
every individual all he has to say is they should try to make it less costly while they raise the lawyers
pay. Typical M.O.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

The only way you can logically meet the terms in 15. (1) is to provide justice free and pay for the
system through taxes.

The taxpayers may watch them a little better but they are cunning unscrupulous critters.

To bring the costs down they have to restructure consistent with the Constitution conducive to the
individuals guaranteed Charter rights and do a complete overhaul on the rule of law to make it
efficient and effective closing all the loopholes that cost the taxpayer’s so much money.

Meanwhile both the Chief Justice Warren Winkler and, Attorney General Chris Bentley have admitted
that the system is too costly and inaccessible just as I charged and even then the Attorney General is
not considering financing through taxation, which would eliminate the department presently deciding
who gets aid and who does not.

The point is not only is this true of what I allege on my web sites but everything is true and
irrefutably proven and yet you stand idly by helping them to cover it up.

The Federal Accountability Act, 2006 is just another cover up attempting to gloss over the
deliberately irresponsible manner the Attorney General has advised the Government departments and
agencies where he already had the authority and responsibility to ensure the government personnel
were operating consistent with the Constitution so what in hell is the federal Accountabilty Act, 2006
going to do that the Constitution Act, 1982 does not….. the Ombudsman Act and so on.

No matter if they enacted 5000 Acts and manned them with a million personnel nothing will change
because the Attorney General is involved with them and he is not about to grant any of them
authority to take him out and end the conspiracy.

Well once again I inform you the evidence is on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name
and 10 affiliate sites.

Perhaps you really did not have a good look at it and perhaps you are in on the conspiracy.

We shall see.

376
August 12 2008 e-mailed as July 12 2008

RCMP Commissioner
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Pierre Leduc
Executive Assisstant to the Commissioner
pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt. www.URus.ca


Royal Canadian Mounted Police Frank Gallagher
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of Crime Section Keswick, On
345 Harry Walker Parkway South franklyone@hotmail.com
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sergeant Roy Steinebach


roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Regular Forces

Sergeant Karen Delorey


Non Commissioned Officer in Charge
Professional Standards Unit
255 Attwell Drive

Milton Detachment
Inspector Brian Verheul
Regular Forces
brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Investigation of refusing to investigate


Government Organized Crime
Corruption and conspiracy
Your File 2007-1355445

Dear RCMP members

The last letter I received from the RCMP was dated July 11 2008 from Sergeant Karen Delorey,
Professional Standards Unit in which she stated a Final Report has been submitted for review to the line
officer of Sergeant Roy Steinbach and inspector Brian Verheul for review.
As soon as a decision is rendered I will be advised via a letter of disposition.

Since more than 30 days has passed and I was informed I would receive a status report every thirty days
until I receive the Final Letter of Disposition I am informing that I am expecting said 30 day report.

The Final Letter of Disposition was originally promised 30 days from the March 20 2008 interim report by
Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam.

377
Given the serious nature of issues and the irrefutable proof of the Government Organized Crime of
corruption and conspiracy it is incomprehensible that the matter is not being attended to in the manner in
which it deserves.

It is consistent with the evidence though and I presume you are all doing your best to manipulate
yourselves out of this but it will invariably just add fuel to the fire the same as the July 26 2008 Saturday
Toronto Star item on the middle class not being able to access the legal system because it is unaffordable
being an admittance of that which I have charged only it is an attempt to brush it under the rug as if it has
been okay for ever how long it has been inaccessible which is a long time I am sure and is evidence of the
two tier system they will deny exists.

Well anyway I am providing you with a new web address for your attention and I await your response as to
what you people are up to.
http://groups.google.com/group/cdf-taming-of-the-shrewd

The truth is preferred but whatever…It will serve a significant purpose.

Thank You

Frank Gallagher

PS

Perhaps some day the people will be able to trust you for your merit.

Deception will be coming more difficult in any event

378
August 13 2008

RCMP Commissioner
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Pierre Leduc
Executive Assisstant to the Commissioner
pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt. www.cdf.name


Royal Canadian Mounted Police Frank Gallagher
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of Crime Section Keswick, On
345 Harry Walker Parkway South franklyone@hotmail.com
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sergeant Roy Steinebach


roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Regular Forces

Sergeant Karen Delorey


Non Commissioned Officer in Charge
Professional Standards Unit
255 Attwell Drive

Milton Detachment
Inspector Brian Verheul
Regular Forces
brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Investigation of refusing to investigate


Government Organized Crime
Corruption and conspiracy
Your File 2007-1355445

This evidence is to be considered in the Final Letter of Disposition

The evidence is irrefutable of government organized crime and I request you carry out the warranted
formalities to bring these people to justice beginning with the personnel referenced in Lawyer Files 1-4
with the intent to gather evidence proving the Attorney General advised them to act so illegitimately. This
will lead you to the Federal Government, the DOJ and others as previously stated and published on the
web.

The evidence provided herein irrefutably proves Ontario Attorney General Chris Bentley’s involvement in
the conspiracy and the January 22 2007 letter from the DOJ proves the federal government never applied
due diligence to the support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights having passed the buck to the
provinces without implementing a plan to ensure they support the guarantee.
Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception
379
Reality is a human term for “How it is” as God would see whether He exists or not or whether one believes
He exists or not where there are 7 billion people in the world of unique perception separated into factions
with sense in common where if we are to live together in peace and harmony there must be a meeting of
the minds with one Common Rule equally fair and receptive to all so as to cohabitate with common sense.

We all require the same necessities of life, susceptible to the same emotions and vulnerable to harm.

Where sanity prevails we can conclude that the Golden Rule is the only rule when abided by all that will
accomplish this elusive aspiration.

Confucius 551 BC- 479 BC born to poverty rose to dine with kings set out to walk amongst the people to
inform them as a philosopher what he had come to know, that they must all abide by the Golden Rule. “Do
not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself”

Jesus paraphrased it 500 years later “Do unto to others as you would have them do unto you”

Confucius and Jesus were considered wise in their days but these words should be as simple and clear to
understand and abide as saying “Hello” and noncompliance as readily apparent as saying “Goodbye”

Credence must be that which is least apt to be mistaken by humankind


As obvious as the ideology is behind the Golden Rule every person must accept their responsibility to
abide and just as obvious is there are many who will not abide even though they believe everyone else
should giving them unfair advantage and obviously they are a detriment to society.

This simply can not be tolerated in a moral society for it grows like weeds unattended where the moral
invariably are deprived.

In Canada the Golden Rule has been adopted in the supreme law of Canada recognized in the supremacy
of God and it is intended to be enforced by the rule of law.

A law, any law without consistent initiatives in consistent support of the purpose is meaningless and puts
the morally inclined at a humongous disadvantage being adverse to the purpose of financing the
government to provide the necessities of society as efficiently and cost effectively as possible.

If it wasn’t for the immorally inclined we would have a whole lot more bucks in our pockets but since we
have contributed to the structuring of a system to deal with the immorally inclined we expect them be dealt
with fortitude and conviction to eradicate amoral persuasion from society.

We are talking about human beings with intelligent minds so we are not talking about calling in an
exterminator to deal with them as an infestation of rats.

Common sense must always prevail consistent with the Golden Rule where the law demands we all be
competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to be incompliance with the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

Morality and immorality are mind things, which parents and guardians play a major role and must be held
responsible for not only themselves but also their kids to ensure they are in compliance with the Golden
Rule henceforth referred to as the Rule. We must be attentive to nipping immorality in the bud.

380
Every individual must obviously know the law and what could be easier to know and understand than the
Rule and why it is necessary to obey.

The government personnel financed to administer and enforce the Rule obviously must be competent
responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction to do it and due the major role
they play to ensure a moral society must be consistently scrutinized and strictly held accountable
to ensure the system is structured efficiently and cost effective consistent to the legitimate authorized
purpose they were financed.

It is apparent the government personnel and the administrators and enforcers of the law, members of the
Law Societies have this absurd opinion they are not required to be competent responsible and
irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights consistent with
the Constitution and the Rule.

Where could they possibly get an idea like that and would they be considered sane?

I think not in “The Spirit” with common sense as they are a special interest group with sense in common
adverse to common sense in “The Spirit” of the Rule.

Their interests for luxurious benefit caused them to structure an illegitimate system into their personal
empire absolutely adverse to legitimate purpose consistent with the Constitution intended to protect every
individual consistent with democracy, the Rule and the Charter where the July 26 2008 Saturday Toronto
Star clearly states one high-profile judge after another, including Ontario Chief Justice Warren Winkler
admit the system is seriously in disrepute being too costly for the middle class to access contrary to
24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or
denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers
appropriate and just in the circumstances.

In the first place a victim attempting to access the court system does so because the legal system
was incompetent to protect them as guaranteed by the Charter and then they have the nerve to
charge the victim exorbitant amounts for their legal right to apply for recompense free.

The legal system is designed for the members of the Law Society to feast off the symptoms of their
refusal to demonstrate due diligence in support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

They thrive to luxurious benefit by refusing to protect the individuals consistent with their legitimate
duty as they need victims for their flourishing business.

These low life’s trade our safety and wellbeing for their illegitimate luxurious lifestyles.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

The evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites has been provided to a prodigious
number of prominent government personnel in the AAAAAALIST document irrefutably proving not one
person acted conducive to the support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection
and benefit before and under the law being conclusive proof they never intended to support the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and have conclusively demonstrated their modus operandi has not
the slightest resemblance to due diligence in support of my or any individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of
protection and benefits.
381
They are negligent in their responsibility where ultimately it is the responsibility of the Attorney Generals
to advise all government departments and agencies and ensure all government personnel are competent
responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to our safety and wellbeing.

These unscrupulous people deliberately put us in harms way as potential victims so they can feast to
luxurious lifestyle and due their greed in complete disregard for our rights of protection suck us dry
through the illegitimate court system designed for the humongous benefit to the humongous detriment of
the taxpayer and most horrid and pathetic disgrace as they throw us to the wolves, left unprotected which
the people are not aware but the criminal element surely is.

Then Michael Trebilcock, University of Toronto law professor wrote a report for Attorney General Chris
Bentley suggesting eligibility for legal aid must be significantly raised to a more realistic level …..so that
middle-class Ontarians develop a material stake in the well-being of the legal aid system.

He obviously is not in touch with reality anymore than the rest of the members of the Law Society.

We finance the entire legal aid system and the legal system obviously having a material stake and we
demand our guaranteed Charter rights, which the members of the Law Society are paid to ensure we get
efficiently and effectively but with their befuddled unscrupulous minds intoxicated with the free flow of
money see this as another opportunity for money suggesting lawyer salaries need to be significantly raised
from $93 an hour.

Attorney General Chris Bentley believes they should attempt to make the court system more affordable.

How much more evidence is required other than their own admittance they do not intend to administer and
enforce the law consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

I have accused the Attorney General of refusing to put a modus operandi in place consistent with the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which has left me a victim which
they refuse to charge the criminal attentive to eradicating immoral inclination from society attentive to
deterrence which is the only practical and logical way to deter crime preventing it before it is committed.

It is understandable that no matter how hard one tries to prevent crime it can not be completely prevented
but they do not attempt to try, feeling the money is better spent distributing it among their members as they
address the symptoms, which are the consequences of their conspiracy.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

The evidence shows the Government members of the Law Society have applied due diligence to not
support every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where attentiveness to punishment is priority
one in deterrence and thus prevention where they have even admitted the majority of the middle
class can not afford to bring the criminal element to justice thus allowing them to flourish leaving a
preponderance more victims in their wake providing the members of the law Society a lucrative
business.

382
24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or
denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers
appropriate and just in the circumstances.

After refusing to protect the individual they have the nerve to charge the victim for their guaranteed right
to apply to court for justice.

The entire legal system, courts, structures, police, parking, vehicles, utilities, maintenance, office furniture
and equipment, human resources….whatever are all financed by the people in trust they will perform their
duties consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of
protection and benefits and when they fail to do it or even demonstrate they have applied due diligence to
their support, in fact have made no effort at all they have the nerve to admit it but present it to the media in
such a manner so as to extort more money from the taxpayer for the members of the Law Society.

Their incompetence to protect every individual as guaranteed by s. 52 (1) of the Charter as per the
responsibility of the Attorney General is a humongously serious offense and the evidence on the Charter
Democracy Force irrefutably proves they never intended to protect the individual and consistently they
refused to address the issues so as to amend their modus operandi adept to do so

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

The evidence shows the Government members of the Law Society are organized crime personified using
the system to ransack societies taxpayers for personal gain not to protect the individual’s as they are
charged to do providing them ample victims necessary for their lucrative business.

Then they have the nerve to obstruct them from their guaranteed right to apply to the courts by charging
them for the justice they are entitled to free guaranteed by the Charter and already financed by the
taxpayer.

24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or
denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers
appropriate and just in the circumstances.

This is akin to shutting the barn door they left open after the horse was intended to get away and they want
the prey ensnared in their web to pay to get it back.
Their modus operandi is played out over and over again with the aid of the media.

Justice will never be served until we demonstrate to them how it works.

In my particular instance that began at the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal on June 30 2005 they have all
refused to address the issues referenced in Lawyer Files 1-4 and they who did respond knew very well my
rights were being trampled on and suggested I get a lawyer knowing civil court was too costly to access.

The system is illegitimately rigged against the individuals of the Lower Tier…Middle class where the
system is only accessible by the people of the Upper Tier, which is undoubtedly illegal inconsistent with
democracy and the Constitution.

383
The RCMP have studied the evidence and know this to be true and it is their responsibility to commence or
cause to commence proceedings for the sanctity of the Constitution and the safety and wellbeing of the
people of the Lower Tier….the moral majority

Frank Gallagher

384
August 14 2008-08-14

To: Toronto Star

Re: Page AA8 Toronto Star August 14 2008


While poverty surges, legal aid comes up short.

The Toronto Star still refuses to tell the people the truth as they cooperate with the government attempting
to manipulate their way out of the evidence that irrefutably proves their conspiracy to ransack society as
the news reports poverty surges and legal aid comes up short.

Of course they will eventually give themselves a decent raise and the problems will be solved.

Of course the public will all have to take another decrease through taxes driving more people into poverty
but the remainder of us in the middle class will just have to pick up our socks.

The big conglomerates will be provided more tax breaks to get the economy moving and the middle class
will pick up that slack and more will fall below the poverty line but do not worry the middle class
survivors will pick up that too.

What else are they good for anyway, they are just people of the Lower Tier.

385
Not only should it apply to everyone alike it is illegal not to being a
guaranteed Charter right.

They continuously support that which I have charged and irrefutably prove
but no charges are being laid as they should which is the only way to make
the government responsible.
The same method that must be consistently used on the people of society.

People are starving because of these people forcing them into crime and
they want raise for it.

Cut the legal aid, put a competent efficient system in place and
humongously decrease the lawyers and government salaries so that justice
can be had by all.

The truth is simply not obtainable from these unscrupulous conspirators


and a public inquiry is the only viable option to straighten this out strictly
scrutinized by the people.

The general public obviously do not read this sort of crap or they would
have a better understanding of what is going on and then the members of
the Law Society would get a better understanding from them who make
near $10 an hour for doing something constructive for society.

It is simply incomprehensible that the members of the Law Societies who


are not required to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed rights are
in positions that demand them to give a demand about the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights.

If I am crazy why not let the people laugh at me?

A Public Inquiry is seriously warranted.

386
The evidence I have provided you all published
on the Charter Democracy Force web sites
irrefutably proves there has never been equality
before the law and there can not be until it
accessible by everyone.
Equality means every individual, which
includes the middle class.
The middle class like me who they have never
had any intention of protecting to a standard of
democracy let alone our guaranteed Charter
rights which they adamantly refuse to support
or give a damn about.

We do not even have a voice or a representative


to stand up for us because they are all in the
conspiracy together under the advisement of the
Attorney General who refuses to accept his
responsibility for the luxurious benefit of his
fellow members of the Law Society.

The justice system is far past disrepute as the


evidence irrefutably proves and you help them
to gloss over it all.

The rich continue to get richer and the poor


The integrity of the justice continue to get poorer simply because it has to
system will be in disrepute with conspirators running the government
until they bring the people to pretending to be for the people.
account for their actions
making the rest of the system Where is all the money? You are welcome to
responsible with due check my financial portfolio.
punishment for those who I sure do not have it and I am sure the majority
would conspire against the of the middle class do not have it or they could
people and the Constitution afford access to the legal system.
itself. Needn’t bother looking for the money in the
poverty sector either.
There are two sides to the
story and only one with the Yet sure enough they will come to the middle
consistent irrefutable evidence class to beef up the legal aid so they can readily
of their conspiracy as they suck more money out of society with decent
continue to confess to the Star raises for ransacking it.
and they gloss it over as they Take the money from the huge corporate
are wont to do being conglomerates making them pay decent wages.
professional charlatans of Whatever it takes to remove the poverty level
deceit and prevarication. from society without creating more poverty in
the middle class sector.
You do not even have to read Freeze government salaries and stop hiring.
between the lines. They admit Make them capable of doing their jobs.
it while attempting to play it Why should their jobs be any more secure with
down as they are on course to pensions than anyone else in a democratic
ransack us for more money. society of equality?
387
Can you believe these people?

The idea of equality before the law is at a serious risk.

Fun with words or charlatan’s of deception,


prevarication, manipulation and orchestration.

There has never been equality and the Legal Aid Act
1967 was instigated by the Law Society to provide their
members a pot full of money to ransack.

Even then a great majority could not afford to access the


legal system and by creating the Legal Aid system was
adverse to the problem adding fuel to the fire providing
the members of the Societies easy money to promote
their lifestyle at the expense of the moral majority who
managed to keep their heads above the poverty line.

It is the illegitimate legal system that deliberately causes


poverty hopelessness and despair in the first place that
forces people to seek alternative options into a life of
crime which is the lawyers bread and butter who charge
the moral majority to defend the criminals through taxes
to feed the Legal Aid system and the other kitties they
set up for themselves drawing from these kitties
whatever they like ransacking society while they who
do not give a damn about every individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights use the guaranteed Charter rights
illegitimately to protect the criminal element from the
people as they do the same for themselves being the
“The idea of equality before the law is at serious risk” is an ultimate of the criminal element.
obvious deliberate understatement when equality has never
existed and the evidence attests being a clear demonstration of Persons with reasonable evidence against them cannot
their illegitimate M.O. that is evidenced consistently possibly be presumed innocent and if they refuse to
throughout the evidence with the RCMP Final Letter of cooperate to permit the police to prove their innocence it
Disposition a prime example of deception, prevarication, only exasperates the situation putting another nail in
manipulation and orchestration. their coffin so to speak, obstructing justice to the
luxurious benefit of the lawyers to the humongous
This is thoroughly documented on the www.URus.ca web site detriment to the taxpayer and society as a whole
and will eventually be compiled and published as an edition of seriously compromising their equal right to protection
the BLACK BOOK. and benefit of the law.

Prerequisite to the equal protection and benefits of the people Persons with reasonable evidence against them are
of a moral society is fortitude and conviction to the eradication subject to and limited to the exceptions in s.1 and s.7
of amoral inclination where due punishment must be and entitled to all of s.8- s.14 of the Charter.
consistently administered attentive to deterrence being the only
viable means to protect the people of present knowledge. The media are well aware of the evidence on the Charter
Democracy Force web sites and I have been charging
Fair swings both ways where every individual is fairly warned that the legal system is not consistent with the
of the Constitution (Law and Order) and when a person defies Constitution adverse to every individual’s guaranteed
the law they must expect the same punishment as the next guy Charter rights as the lawyers are only interested in
or it is simply unfair to the guy who gets a life sentence and money to luxurious lifestyle and justice consistent with
guys like OJ go free. the Constitution is irrelevant to them with the media
supporting them and this is clear irrefutable evidence.
Of course they eventually end up where they belong but how
many victims are left in their wake.
388
August 18 2008

RCMP Commissioner
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Pierre Leduc
Executive Assisstant to the Commissioner
pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


Royal Canadian Mounted Police www.cdf.name
Toronto Integrated Proceeds of Crime Section Frank Gallagher
345 Harry Walker Parkway South Keswick, On
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6 frank@cdf.name
905-953-7580
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sergeant Roy Steinebach


roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Regular Forces

Sergeant Karen Delorey


Non Commissioned Officer in Charge
Professional Standards Unit
255 Attwell Drive

Milton Detachment
Inspector Brian Verheul
Regular Forces
brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Investigation of refusing to investigate


Government Organized Crime
Corruption and conspiracy
Your File 2007-1355445

New request for investigation of Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy against the individual’s
of the Lower Tier

In addition to the evidence previously provided you under Your File 2007-1355445 and evidence published on the
Charter Democracy Force web sites www.cdf.name and 10 affiliate sites accessible through the www.cdf.name site I
provide you the following evidence published on the CanLaw Lawyer referral site which attests to the fact the entire
legal system is incompetently corrupt incapable of administering and enforcing law consistent with the Constitution
conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

I have mentioned evidence is available everywhere in reality if you have a mind to do it.
You will find plenty of informative information on the http://www.canlaw.com web site

Judges say system is shambles


Lawyers say they are arrogant, power mad…..incompetent

The people say nothing because they do not know about it.
Why is that?
389
When I first came across their site I could not believe that they were confirming some of that which I
have been stating and have irrefutably proven.

The legal system is in disrepute and must be restructured consistent with the Constitution conducive to
every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights

Lawyers in the private sector are afraid of the incompetent, arrogant and power mad judges and so.

I have written many lawyers without response, however one took a little more time but said he could not
help because he had done work for Attorney General Michael Bryant and it would be in conflict of
interest.
Another wrote after a reasonable time to review the evidence stating he could not help me with this one.

I thought sure CanLaw would help after seeing the evidence on their web site but unfortunately I was
right in the first place, that they were part of the conspiracy either directly or indirectly for obvious it
would be professional suicide.

Canlaw was not too receptive to the idea

I tried 3 times and they are out.

look you stupid bastard, STOP SPAMMING US OR ELSE

STOP SPAMMING US
YOU ARE A RAVING LUNATIC

Go to hell, asshole

It is not easy being an individual.


I best hurry getting us individual’s organized

The government members of the legal profession tell me to gat a lawyer


Lawyer Referral Service tell me to go to hell

The world populace is doomed if the RCMP do not do the job required of them.

Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force

390
August 18 2008
CanLaw www.canlaw.com
This is not spam

I am seriously in desperate need of a lawyer to litigate government organized crime, corruption and conspiracy
against the people of the Lower Tier who have structured a system inconsistent with the Constitution adverse to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, which irrefutably proves that which is published on your web site and much
more.
I have clipped a few excerpts in support of some of the charges I have made to the RCMP and have irrefutably
proven on the Charter Democracy Force Web site www.cdf.name and 10 affiliate sites (Now www.URus.ca)

Law Societies are designed to protect lawyers.


Existing judicial councils erroneously believe their function is to protect judges from the public, not the public from
judges.
Lawyers all know to be seen publicly criticizing a judge is professional suicide
Ask any lawyer…….they will unofficially tell you many judges (not all) are egomaniacs. Many are rude, arrogant
and power mad. Many are living proof that power corrupts.
Can you help please?
Frank Gallagher Perhaps a Class Action?

391
-----Original Message-----
From: CanLaw [mailto:canlaw@canlaw.com]
Sent: August 18, 2008 11:11 AM
To: franklyone@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Please, this is not spam

Go to hell, asshole

At 10:37 AM 18/08/2008 -0400, you wrote:


>
>
>
>
>
> August 18 2008
>
>CanLaw
>----------------------------------------------------
>This message has been processed by Firetrust Benign.
>
>
>
>WARNING: The remainder of this message has not been transferred.
>The estimated size of this message is 359251 bytes.
>Click on the Retrieve From Server icon above and check mail again to get
>the whole thing. (If you're reading this in the preview pane, you'll need
>to open the message to see the icon.) If the Retrieve From Server icon is
>not showing, then this message is no longer on the server.

August 13 2008

This consumer has a damn good idea that the entire legal system is
Government Organized Crime personified with the members of the
Law Societies the major players.

Correct me if I am wrong, please.

Perhaps it is just the Government members of the Law Societies as I


have irrefutable evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force
web site www.cdf.name and 10 affiliate sites.
392
On November 8 2007 I filed evidence with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP for
refusing to investigate Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy against the people of
the Lower Tier and on July 11 2008 the Professional Standards Unit wrote to inform they have completed
studying the evidence on my web sites and a Final Report has been forwarded to the line officer of two
RCMP members I named in the complaint.
I will receive a Final Letter of Disposition upon completion of the review.

The evidence shows the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot, Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day,
Minister of Justice and Attorney General Robert Nicholson, the PM Stephen Harper, Ontario Attorney
General and many others are involved so I do not expect a whole lot from the Final Letter of Disposition.

If their report is negative after a thorough investigation of the evidence that irrefutably proves the
corruption through out they will have provided the conclusive proof.

I expected to receive it already and I presume one of two things.

They are looking for a way out but there is no door or they are organizing to do what must be done and
warranted by the evidence.

We will see.

If any lawyer in the private sector truly believes the system needs humongous change this is your
opportunity to jump on the band wagon and I apologize for what you will read..

Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force

PS

Perhaps a substantial law suit will wake them up if the RCMP do not

393
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:franklyone@hotmail.com]
Sent: August 14, 2008 1:01 PM
To: 'J Kirby Inwood'
Subject: RE: How about true story

You must be a member of the Law Society.

Evidence means nothing to you either

Will you look at the evidence?


http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
Please answer and then I will remove you from my e-mail list

-----Original Message-----
From: J Kirby Inwood [mailto:jki@canlaw.com]
Sent: August 14, 2008 12:45 PM
To: franklyone@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: How about true story

STOP SPAMMING US
YOU ARE A RAVING LUNATIC

On 14/08/2008 12:21:22 PM, Frank Gallagher (frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca) wrote:


> August 14 2008-08-14
>
>
>
> To: Toronto Star
>
>
>
> Re: Page AA8 Toronto Star August 14 2008
>
> While poverty surges, legal aid comes up short.
>
>
>
>
>
> The Toronto Star still refuses to tell the people the truth as they
> cooperate with the government attempting to manipulate their way out of
> the
> evidence that irrefutably proves their conspiracy to ransack society as
> the
> news reports poverty surges and legal aid comes up short.
>
>
>
> Of course they will eventually give themselves a decent raise and the
> problems will be solved.
>
>
>
> Of course the public will all have to take another decrease through taxes
> driving more people into poverty but the remainder of us in the middle
> class
> will just have to pick up our socks.

394
>
>
>
> The big conglomerates will be provided more tax breaks to get the economy
> moving and the middle class will pick up that slack and more will fall
> below
> the poverty line but do not worry the middle class survivors will pick up
> that too.
>
>
>
> What else are they good for anyway, they are just people of the Lower Tier.

_________________________________________________________________________
You Can Trust CanLaw
www.canlaw.com <http://www.canlaw.com/>

We help real people with real solutions for real problems

-----Original Message-----
From: CanLaw [mailto:canlaw@canlaw.com]
Sent: August 14, 2008 1:08 PM
To: franklyone@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: How about true story?

look you stupid bastard, STOP SPAMMING US OR ELSE

At 12:21 PM 14/08/2008 -0400, you wrote:

>
>August 14 2008-08-14
>
>----------------------------------------------------
>This message has been processed by Firetrust Benign.
>
>
>
>WARNING: The remainder of this message has not been transferred.
>The estimated size of this message is 938689 bytes.
>Click on the Retrieve From Server icon above and check mail again to get
>the whole thing. (If you're reading this in the preview pane, you'll need
>to open the message to see the icon.) If the Retrieve From Server icon is
>not showing, then this message is no longer on the server.

395
August 19 2008

To: RCMP
AAAAAALIST
www.cdf.name

Why not common sense?

Let’s get down to business

Law Society Out Business in

It is a pathetic disgrace what the legal profession has done to this country, no different than in other
countries no doubt.

Lawyers are all about money as are we all

The thing is it is ours, they can go find theirs the hard way too.

They can not be trusted and it just as plain and simple as that.

The evidence is insurmountable and the RCMP has not even begun to look into it because the crooks
believe they can stop them and so the RCMP believes it making it real.

The entire system is unconstitutional with a tangled web of elastic founded on deceit and prevarication
where there are simply too many why’s not answered that invariably answer themselves

This is a democracy, a country of free people that can be run on any platform they choose consistent with
the Constitution Act, 1982 in its pure and legitimate form structured with competent responsible
irreproachable people with fortitude and conviction committed to its people and the country as a whole.

The entire government and public servants including all property, structures, furnishings, vehicles
equipment, maintenance, utilities, human resources…..whatever are financed by the people to provide the
necessities of a moral society and they need to know it is running like a business in efficient and cost
effective manner dealing with the day to day business.
They are share holder and need to know precisely what is going on..

It is too obvious the government members of the Law Society and elected representatives are of the
opinion the entire system belongs to them, our human resources provided them to aid in the service of our
country which includes our Armed Forces and Police Forces and yet if push comes to shove they would
fire on us, their own relatives and friends being absolutely absurd.

396
The evidence is pathetically horrific that these people just do not give a damn about the Canadian people
and you can bet they care less for the people of other countries as wars have persisted since there have
been leaders to initiate them in persistent pursuit of power and wealth.

The governments arm in arm with members of the legal profession; most often one and the same are
pathological liars, trained in the art of deception and prevarication taking advantage of every opportunity
that presents itself manipulating the markets from all corners of the world in cooperation with the banks,
big corporate conglomerates with lobbyist everywhere cooking up backroom deals and our own politicians
compromising here and there with each other handling our money as if it was theirs. They simply are big
time crooks, Organized Crime personified with the politicians and police in their pocket all being in on the
scam since Brian Mulroney made the RCMP Commissioner a Deputy Minister back in 1984 I believe.
Yes the same Mulroney of the Mulroney/Schreiber scandal who demonstrated the incompetence of the
legal system by failing to declare $275,000 …whatever on his income tax for 8 years until he got word
they were coming after him.
The average person would have been charged with income tax evasion but he ends up with $2,000,000
paid for by the people.
Sure there is more to the story but the bottom line is he got $2,000,000

It is the rest of the story that has to be looked in to see why in hell something like that can happen.

The same kind of story as the Hydro One scandal with the president …Forrester I believe charged with
using his secretary’s credit card for $45,000 and gets off with a decent pension and payout of 1.6 million if
I recall correctly.
The reason he was not charged as we are told is lawyers advised it would cost a whole lot more to litigate.

No doubt, but WHY?

The laws are integrated with nefarious intent designed by the unscrupulous for the unscrupulous simply
taking advantage of the public and society as a whole thereby making it impossible for the individual to
present his or her case themselves or have a clue of what the hell is going on.
They left the realm of common sense for illegitimate purpose providing humongous advantage to the
affluent and influential in direct violation of the Constitution creating a system averse to the meaning of
democracy inconsistent with the Constitution not conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

There is only one way to ensure these provisions are met and that is to provide the system free to every
individual funded through tax revenues.

A person’s rights are fixed to them as an arm or leg and they cannot be removed due to incompetence of
either the system, member of the legal profession, judge…..whatever.

They did not design the system consistent with the Constitution or conducive to every individual’s
guaranteed rights.

397
They specifically designed it for the benefit of the members of the law society to ransack society and the
evidence is every where to prove it. Societies have been well ransacked world wide.

It is proven by the members of the Law Societies every time they open their mouths.

When they are confronted with improprieties with seemingly no way out they resort to plan C for closure.
They create so called independent agencies such as the Ombudsman or Commissions as they did with the
Federal Accountability Act, 2006 to appear as if they are doing the appropriate thing that takes the pressure
off them immediately but they not give them the power providing them only limited authority remaining
under advisement of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada or the provincial Attorney
General as puppet agencies and their purpose is to diffuse complaints with the bottom line after a careful
review of the situation their member is found to have acted properly within the parameters of the law,
however if one cares to may consult with a lawyer and apply to the courts for a remedy, knowing full well
they made the system to costly to access..

Of course the general public is not aware of the connivance embedded into the system but it is there in
everything they do.

Their report will end, and in accordance with section so and so of a pertinent Act the matter is now closed.

They have stolen our entire system, moved their Law Society members in and have ransacked society ever
since.

They have come to believe they are the law and there is not a damn thing we can do about it but that is not
how it ends by a long shot.

They are arrogant pathetic boisterous righteous ……..Confucius said it this way………

“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY… finally I began to make out what was written
between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”

There is a prodigious amount of evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site
www.cdf.name (Now www.URus.ca ) and 10 affiliate sites to learn to read between the lines.

Study and learn and when you are finished you will see what these pathetic greedy fools have done with
the world.

Check their financial portfolios relative to the opportunities their positions have afforded them and then
commence proceedings to have the booty returned to its proper owner, the Canadian people who own the
government.

Priority one is to get this information to the public, and halt the entire illegitimate court system until the
announcement is made that the jig is up, the public is aware and the legal personnel are immediately
commencing to administer and enforce the laws consistent with the Constitution as respectable competent
responsible irreproachable public servants in continuity with fortitude and conviction attentive to priority
one, the equal protection and benefits of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter,

398
It is illegal for members of the Law Society or the courts to collect funds from victims asserting their
guaranteed Charter rights under:

. 24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or
denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers
appropriate and just in the circumstances.

What the court considers appropriate must be consistent with the Constitution whereas the victim was
guaranteed not to become a victim and upon conclusion of the courts finding the person became a victim
due the actions of an other or others must be reinstated to the status he or she was in prior to the occurrence
that caused them to seek the remedy of the courts with due regard for reasonable compensation for mental,
physical injury and inconvenience incurred.

The courts will make every effort to collect all costs from the person or persons found guilty of the offense
and take every measure possible to ensure such incidents never reoccurs.
Of course due punishment must also be dispensed and where a fine is appropriate it goes into the kitty to
support the system.

The Constitution must be read simultaneously with all laws where any, and all inconsistencies that obstruct
a favourable conclusion to the victim is null and void in accordance with:

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

All inconsistencies will be logged immediately and proper notice will be circulated throughout the court
systems and quarterly the obtrusive laws will be amended to eradicate the inconsistencies.

All government departments, agencies…..whatever will review their policies to ensure they are consistent
with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and where there is room
for error it will favour the victim whereas immoral inclination has no right in our courts or anywhere in
Canada where the Constitution is the supreme law of Canada that recognises the supremacy of God and the
people recognize the Golden Rule as the rule of law and the spirit it must be administered and enforced
where sanity and common sense must prevail.

At this precise moment the law is in pathetic disrepute in the illegitimate hands of the members of the Law
Societies who have humongously deceived the people for nefarious purpose evidenced in every thing they
do using humongous advantage over the individuals in complete defiance of Part 1, Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms of the Constitution, and in particular their guaranteed rights.

The only way every individual’s rights can be assured is to immediately inform the people precisely “How
it is” and from that moment on “How it is” will be precisely how it should be in accordance with the
supreme law of Canada under the supremacy of God whether He exists or not or whether any individual
believes He exists or not.

For all intent and purpose He is alive and well as certain as are all His children under His guidance
administered and enforced by the peoples’ representatives who must be competent responsible
irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction to ensure every individual is equally protected
and benefitted as guaranteed by the Charter in sane and common sense manner consistent with “The Spirit
and the Letter of the Law”

399
Any person who interferes or obstructs a police officer in performance of his or her duty in compliance
with the Constitution to protect individuals in accordance with their guaranteed Charter rights will be
immediately dealt with consistent with the law.
Urgency is to restructure the system conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where it is
either stated or implied that it must be done as efficiently and cost affectively as possible where it is
prerequisite that every individual knows that actions of immoral intent will be immediately addressed
nipping it in the bud where immoral inclination is most efficiently and effectively dealt with caught in its
early stages.

Members of the Law Society and the peoples’ representatives will immediately cooperate or be dealt with
to the harshest extent of the law looking into their past history and made to account.

I trust you are all up to the task as do the people and failure to perform your duties consistent with the
Constitution simply cannot and will not be tolerated.

Old habits will die quick and new habits consistent with the Constitution will commence simultaneously
where the evidence has been provided and studied by the RCMP since November 2007 and now 9 months
later the new system is born.

Nurture it to an early adulthood under the watchful eye of the people, for it is our baby you are tending to.

The people will be informed the Charter Democracy Force www.cdf.name is their place to file complaints
against any of our public servants who dare to mess with the people of the Constitution of Canada.

Sanity and common sense in all matters of the Constitution of Canada will be in place the moment the
public is brought up to speed by our representatives.

That is you people from this moment as long as you give no cause to suspect you are anything else but
competent responsible irreproachable people in continuity with fortitude and conviction to your assigned
duties interpreted by filling in between the lines with “The Spirit and the Letter of the Law” where “The
Spirit” has priority wherever there is conflict in terms.

There is no need to assign any punishment as long as the guilty are brought before the public and
acknowledge their part in the conspiracy showing sincere remorse and shame with immediate positive
action to the restructuring of the system.

Consistency to “The Spirit” must be persistently maintained.

Personnel who cannot find their way to an efficient and cost effective usefulness to the people in their
present position will be offered another position as near equivalent to that which would have been their
legitimate position but the Government members of the Law Society can be assured their numbers will be
decreased along with their salaries as the system is immediately uncomplicated for the express purpose of
administering and enforcing the law for the benefit of the people, not them.

Salaries will be immediately frozen and staff hiring ceased.

Any comments or suggestions will be greatly appreciated and in the meantime it is well over due for
getting the show on the road.

400
Remember it is impossible to do a job unless you know what is to be accomplished so know the law
according to the Constitution not the nefarious unmitigated crap initiated by the unscrupulous members of
the Law Societies.

Tell it “How it is” Deal with it “How it is” and change it for God’s sake consistent with “The Spirit”
whether He exists or not or whether you believe He exists or not.

RCMP you have a preponderance of evidence that demand your undivided attention where due course is to
investigate and bring the personnel referenced in the Lawyer Files 1-4 before the courts documenting and
collecting all evidence in pursuance of bringing the office of the Attorney General of Ontario before the
courts to expose its irrational incompetent and irresponsible administration inconsistent with the
Constitution in complete disrespect of the trust placed upon them by the Ontario people.

This will initiate the metamorphosis of heaven on earth under the supremacy of God whether or not He
exists, ever did or ever believed for all intent and purpose He exists now.

Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force

PS

Life was never intended to be what the members of the Law Society prescribed for us

Time effort and further waste of the taxpayer’s money would be saved if the Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada along with the Ontario Attorney General would immediately step forward
announcing the immediate shake up of the government stating after a long arduous venture into the
evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name with considerable thought
and reason having already been in the process of reform unequivocally concur with the findings of the
force and have commenced proceedings to immediately conform in respect of the people we represent.
Remorse goes a long way.

A review of the cases of the people presently incarcerated is of the utmost urgency of those people not
considered dangerous offenders with the objective to clean out the penitentiaries giving everyone the
opportunity of a brand new start in this brand new beginning.

At the same time announce to the people that immoral inclination will no longer be allowed to be a burden
on the people of the moral society.

401
September 10 2008

RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Pierre Leduc, Insp.


Executive Assistant to the Commissioner
pierre.leduc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Bob MacAdam, S/Sgt.


Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sergeant Roy Steinebach


roy.steinebach@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Inspector Brian Verheul


Milton Detachment
brian.verheul@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sergeant Karen Delorey


Professional Standards Unit
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Investigation refused to investigate


Government Organized Crime
Corruption and conspiracy
Your File 2007-1355445

Dear members of the RCMP

To dispel the notion that by fulfilling your responsibilities according to present policies, laws, standards
and procedures….whatever, assigned under the reign of the unscrupulous members of the Law Societies
does not fulfill your responsibilities to the people and the Constitution in consistent support of every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

You must be competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction to every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits and demonstrate due diligence
ensuring the guarantee is genuine.

You all have personal knowledge of the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy
perpetrated against every individual that most seriously affects the individuals of the moral majority, the
people of the Lower Tier, and none of you are done until the government organized crime is done, whereas
it would be an inane argument to state you had fulfilled your responsibilities to the tee assigned by the
conspirators without confirming CONSISTENCY with the Constitution conducive to the support of every
individual’s guaranteed equal rights.

402
The only way you can be assured you have acted competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity
with fortitude and conviction is to document your efforts to ensure the continuity right to the final
conclusion where actions taken by the RCMP must be consistent with the Constitution conducive to the
due diligent support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which ultimately means in this case
appropriation action to eradicate the immoral inclination that has gone uncontested allowing for the
success of the government organized crime to the humongous detriment to the people of the Lower Tier
you are charged with the responsibility to eradicate the detriments and implement the benefits to the people
of financing law enforcement consistent with the law.

Yesterday September 9 2008 a man called me around 2 PM I believe, give or take an hour or so, at my
home phone number 905-476-8959 wanting to speak to Don Wilson who you should know as the President
of Bio Safe, my former tenant who committed criminal acts at the ORHT June 30 2005, not yet addressed
appropriately.

After a short discussion I felt it necessary to inform him I have Don Wilson up on charges for fraud when
he told me he was looking for Don to account for a cheque he had bounced.

I suggested he go to my web site www.cdf.name (Now www.URus.ca and requested he post his story.

I did not have the foresight to ask who was calling, how much the cheque was for and other pertinent
information knowing he had a vested interest in visiting the site to find out what ever he could relative to
his particular individual problem.

The point is it is significantly relevant to the issues I have addressed of the consequences of the deliberate
incompetent modus operandi of the government legal system to support every individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights, consistently refusing to support them by applying due diligence to due punishment attentive
to deterrence where ultimately his individual problem, mine and every individual’s of similar problems are
symptoms of the incompetence of the legal system to address them in diligent manner to eradicate them.

It is predictable that the criminal element will not be stopped by the mere act of informing them that it is
illegal to “Do unto others as they would not have done to themselves”.

That of course is the sane moral purpose of thought and reason to structure a legal system of competent
responsible and irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction in continuity adept to prevention of
such criminal acts necessary to protect every individual as guaranteed.

I have no idea how he will react after reading the published evidence where the amount of money involved
plays a major role in his decision and interest to pursue it, where the evidence shows under the present
illegitimate system inconsistent with the Constitution is inept to either protect or provide viable recourse to
deter or recompense which I am sure he is aware or soon will become aware if he should pursue the matter
through the system.
It is quite possible he will do the same as Rod Bradbury of Eco Safe; Vancouver, BC who Don Wilson had
falsely stated on his prospectus was a Vice President of Bio Safe, and write it off as a learning experience.

These are learning experiences to them and should be learning experiences to everyone involved in the
legal system but generally inherent to the system normally such cases go unnoticed or reported which
effectively obstructs the learning experience.

403
I have provided you this information to bypass the obstruction to enhance the learning experience where it
is presumed professionals in the legal system such as the police are competent in the fine art of
investigative practice and are able to extrapolate from the available evidence that there are unknown
numbers of Don Wilson victims prior to my charges against Don Wilson of the crimes he committed at the
ORHT on June 30 2005 as well as the unknown numbers of his victims since I first reported him and the
numbers that lay waiting in his future.

How obvious to sane moral thought and reason he must be stopped and how obvious the present legal
system structured by the government members of the Law Society is deliberately not only incompetent to
do it, but have no desire to do it as they thrive to luxurious lifestyle addressing the symptoms of their
deliberate, blatantly admitted “do not give a damn about every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights”
attitude.

It is due to their incompetent inefficient exorbitantly wasteful of taxpayer’s money, adverse to legitimate
moral purpose of sane moral thought and reason evidenced in the July 26 2008 Saturday Star that they
have ransacked the system to such a pathetic state that it is not accessible to the moral people of the Middle
Class and that should be significant reason why you cannot count on the public to ensure every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights are protected as guaranteed.

For every victim that cannot afford justice goes a person free to create more victims until they stir up one
with enough money to catch the interest of the unscrupulous members of the Law Societies

Even more to the point individual’s do not have the wherewithal to deal with these matters where they
simply are not financially supported, professionally trained or experienced in such matters being natural to
public individuals who have other fields of endeavours who must focus on conducive to providing the
necessities of self and family.

In continuance of sane moral purpose adept to sane thought and reason the government personnel are
financed by the people to provide departments and agencies staffed by competent responsible
irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to deal with the necessities of a moral society, not
create necessities as the members of the Law Societies have demonstrated structuring the system to
consistently provide them victims to extort humongous money from those who can afford and care to
access the illegitimate system they structured for their personal luxurious success.

Attentive to sane moral purpose of sane moral thought and reason it is the responsibility of the
government members of the Law Societies who have accepted financial benefits to administer and enforce
the law consistent with the Constitution with priority one to the safety and wellbeing of every moral
individual in compliance with the law as they must be consistent with the Constitution: Document which
demands a Constitution: Establishment of personnel coherent to “The Spirit of the Law” and competent
responsible irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction to make “The Spirit of the Law”
REAL so as to ensure every individual is equally protected as guaranteed.

It is predictable with the present government members of the Law Societies holding every position of
authority in the legal system that every individual taxpayer of the moral majority in the private sector will
be ransacked, while putting humongous effort to their careers in the private sector having accepted their
responsibilities to provide their own personal necessities only to have the benefits of their humongous
efforts exerted by the private sector extorted by the insatiable Law Societies members where there simply
is not enough hours in the day to allow the people sufficient sleep time to exert the efforts to satisfy their
lust for wealth and power.

404
Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet is precisely due to perception
Reality itself is the consequences of allowing members of the legal profession to have their way with us
uncontested where the irrefutable evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites is that
acquired by one individual in his attempt to get the justice demanded in a democracy consistent with the
supreme law of Canada, the Constitution.

Every individual of the 33 million of Canada has their own story affected by the unscrupulous members of
the Law Societies where they of poverty need attest no more and present circumstance of reality
guarantees every individual will consistently need to work harder to maintain a financial status above the
poverty line where the consistency of the members of the Law Societies to ransack society can only end in
one of two ways.

The individual will become exhausted with no energy left to keep up the pace to satiate these insatiable
blights on society where civil war must break out as the people rise to fight out of necessity for their food
and water and the air to breath, vital to their survival as is the eradication of the immoral persuasion
embedded in the legal system.

This will happen as assuredly as history attests, so sad the people will never learn, at least not so far as
reality has been documented where “There are no dates in this history……as Confucius and history
attests.

If the RCMP grasps the reality with firm grip as to their intended moral purpose that the people are led to
believe, the eradication of immoral inclination could be done the simple easy way without chaotic results
that are destined to reoccur over and over again until the root of the problem is dealt with to the final
resolve.

I presume enough has been stated herein accompanied by the irrefutable evidence published on the web
site that if the members of the RCMP are competent responsible irreproachable in continuity with fortitude
and conviction to structure a competent investigative and enforcement authority consistent with the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights they will be coherent to the
significance of the phone call made to me yesterday, September 9 2008 that supports that which I have
alleged to be predictable of the system designed, administered and enforced by the unscrupulous members
of the Law Societies who are not required to give a damn about every individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights and so they do not to the humongous detriment of the moral majority of society.

Having said that and having provided the RCMP my phone number, which they certainly could find for
themselves, and of course determine who it was that telephoned me yesterday to call and gather further
evidence to support the obvious that what is predictable can only be prevented when due diligence is
applied.

The predictable is not so precise as to determine who will become Don Wilson’s next victim, but
assuredly as he is left to walk in society free to chance upon others there will be victims left in his wake
and as assuredly as there is a Constitution, a Charter guarantee to every individual and the RCMP financed
to protect every individual it is damn well time they earned their pay to make every effort to ensure not
only Don Wilson is brought before the courts to be administered his punishment attentive to deterrence but
to ensure the government members of the Law Societies are brought before the courts to be administered

405
punishment attentive to deterrence where the ultimate purpose is to ensure the system is restructured adept
to the sane moral purpose that is the Constitution of Canada.

To they who are safe and sound, urgency is not of the essence but if the victims were made aware the
RCMP have been duly informed by the Charter Democracy Force of the government organized crime and
the certainty all taxpayers are victims and a prodigious number of others allowed to be preyed upon by the
private sector immoral element vital to the survival of the luxurious lifestyles the members of the Law
Societies have come to know, assuredly they would ask “Please RCMP, explain why you would let them
do this to me”

I remind you people of the RCMP you cannot count on every individual of the moral majority to be as
competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction as me to the safety and well being
of every individual as guaranteed because they simply are people who have applied themselves to their
own personally selected fields of endeavour and interests and only by chance is my selected field of
endeavour, interests, experiences and precise circumstances, with available time to apply on behalf of the
moral majority that I have accepted the responsibility even though not advantaged with the wherewithal
and authority provided the RCMP, exert every effort I am capable of and do not deny I am in desperate
need of competent help in aid of the people of the moral majority.

My web sites attest to my efforts and strengths as well as my weaknesses and the inabilities of this
individual to assert my rights to REALism where ultimately that is the responsibility of the irresponsible
Attorney General of Ontario relative to the safety and wellbeing of this individual, the person who phoned
me yesterday and all others who would phone me if they knew of me and what I am determined to achieve.

The aspirations of the RCMP most certainly should be coincidental to mine consistent with the
Constitution and having been provided the irrefutable evidence the manner in which they apply themselves
must withstand the ultimate test of due diligence to the sanctity of the Constitution in support of every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

Presumably they have the wherewithal but we will see.


Decidedly words and empty promises must be left to the politicians and members of the Law Societies
specialist in charlatan profession most adept in the art of deception and prevarication

Yours, RCMP is to eradicate immoral inclination by enforcing the Constitution in an adept manner to do
so

Police Services Act


R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc

Declaration of principles

1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles:
1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario.
2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.

406
3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they
serve.
4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.

RCMP

Is your modus operandi adept to protect every individual as guaranteed or is it adept to protect every
individual of the Law Societies?

Surely you must know as certain as the people need to know as certain as they are soon to know as your
coherence to the above and all that has been published on the Charter Democracy Force is demonstrated as
you address the issues vital to the safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed.

Make the declaration of principles true by diligent efforts due the seriousness of the issues where words are
meaningless unless they are kept secure.

Perhaps you would be interested in a response I received from the USA on page 9

Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force
www.cdf.name

PS

Note there has been no positive action by the Attorney General Chris Bentley to date even though he has
been duly informed by registered mail.

How could he do anything other than advise everyone that his office is legitimate even though all of reality
and the evidence published by the Charter Democracy Force irrefutably proves him guilty as hell and he
must remain consistent with the devil ways of the conspiracy or thrust himself upon his own sword.
Since he is not so inclined as reality attests having yet to hear mention on the news he has inadvertently
done so anyway where he was provided no viable option for the continued success of the conspiracy.

Yes, the Charter Democracy Force system was fixed purposely to allow him to experience the feelings of
hopelessness and despair that the fixed system he has guarded has perpetrated against the people of the
Lower Tier.

Just in time for this edition of the Charter Democracy Force is an e-mail from the Green Party proving
fairness is only relative when they believe they have been unfairly treated and beg the people to aid them
on the façade they care for them and their right to know the truth of the goings on in the political and legal
arena.

This political party obviously does not give a damn about the people any more than any other political
party or members of the Law Society who claim for the people their rights to know only to the extent that
benefits these unscrupulous people where if they truly cared about the people they would inform them of
the truth of everything they need to know to make a competent decision when they vote.

407
The illegitimate system irrefutably proven by the published evidence on the Charter Democracy Force web
sites that has been provided to all political parties including the Green Party does not concern them that the
people need to know the Charter Democracy Force published truths but when they have problems of their
own not being treated fairly as they would like have the nerve to beg the people to stand up for them when
obviously they have no intention of ever standing up for the people consistent with the conspiracy where
all political parties are major players in the conspiracy using every unscrupulous trick in the book to
advance their positions to wealth and power.

The fast track to legitimate power


Should they or any other political party take advantage of this one in a gazillion opportunity to a majority
government, respected by the people they need only to demonstrate respect for the people and their
guaranteed Charter rights and inform them of the Charter Democracy Force web sites where the need to
know truth is abundantly evidenced.

See page 10 where I inform the Green Party once again what they need to know as well as the people.

-----Original Message-----
From: orion@system1.tradingsystems.net [mailto:orion@system1.tradingsystems.net]
Sent: September 9, 2008 12:41 PM
To: franklyone@hotmail.com
Subject: Tax Reform and Public Service

Dear Friend:

The question comes to every candidate: Will you raise or lower taxes; and for whom
and why ?

Unless a candidate is ignorant, dishonest or indifferent toward public service, how


can they actually answer this question without doing some real accounting first. To
be honest in public service, the cost of waste, fraud and abuse in government has to
be answered first. This means that we must thoroughly understand the operational cost
of government.
( http://unity2008.org/?OperationsCostReform.html )

When accounting for this, which I personally believe is about 2/3rds dysfunctional,
then the answer would be that every tax payer is paying 3 times as much tax as they
should.

The next part of the answer requires the determination of the taxes collected as
actually being Constitutional according to Amendment 16.

Without accounting for the above first, would a candidate actually be considered
competent in serving the people ? So fundamentally, in terms of tax issues,
candidates should be scrutinized closely, as it more than likely will cost you money
that most don't have or care to spare.

So if a candidate claims that they will tax the rich more to pay for needed programs
for all, consider are they ignorant or dishonest? And if a candidate claims that they
will give tax breaks to corporations, but leave you out, should it be obvious from
where they are coming from?

408
Considering the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government haven't
genuinely addressed your tax issues as described in the above, perhaps the question
should be to candidates is: What is your plan for tax reform, or in otherwords, cost
effective government? (http://unity2008.org/?TaxSystem.html )

Your Option -

If not interested in the solutions proposed for issues that we are all confronted
with, simply say it here:
http://unity2008.org/NotInterested.cgi?franklyone@hotmail.com

Respectfully,

Orion Karl Daley


Presidential Candidate for 2008
Author - The New Deal ISBN: 1419670948
for the Strategic Future of our nation
Balanced Party http://unity2008.org
New York, NY, USA -

***********************************************************************************

Better still, say it here in Canada at www.cdf.name or e-mail franklyone@hotmail.com

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:franklyone@hotmail.com]


Sent: September 10, 2008 6:33 AM
To: 'Green Party of Canada'
Subject: RE: This Isn't Over!

September 10 2008

Re: This isn’t over!

Not by a long shot!!


The decision to exclude the Green Party Leader Elizabeth May from the televised
leader’s debates must stand and set precedence that all political parties whose
leaders do not give a damn about the people they beg for their votes be outcast from
the televised leader’s debates.

No doubt there would then be no debate saving the taxpayers and the people of the
moral majority endless grief, hopelessness and despair where the world needs now what
it has always needed, leaders who respect and give a damn about all people.

Now is the opportunity for Canadians to demonstrate to the world how efficient and
cost effective leadership by sane moral persons adept to sane moral thought and
reason for sane moral purpose in “The Spirit of the Law” which is strict adherence to
the Golden Rule consistent with democracy and the supreme law of Canada, the
Constitution that recognizes the supremacy of God where the Golden Rule is the
simplification of the aspirations attributed to God personified where it is
irrelevant as to whether He exists or not or whether or not one believes He exists.

The people need to believe our leaders are in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law”
and the only way they will be convinced is for a leader to stand up FFF, Forthright,
Forthcoming and Forthwith right now and inform them where the truth is to be found
published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name where they will find

409
this document “VictimswhileyouwaitSeptember102008, also published on the “REALizing
the Attorney General” affiliate web site http://groups.google.com/group/realizing-the-
attorney-general

Who so ever runs on that platform will be legitimate contenders for the ultimate role
of leading us into the twenty first century in sustainable peace and harmony among
all people never yet attempted in a sane moral competent responsible manner with sane
moral responsible competent responsible government personnel.

You Elizabeth May have been duly informed as well as the people on the AAAAAAALIST and most
assuredly the RCMP who are monitoring your every move as assuredly they must to be the competent
responsible irreproachable people they must be to ensure every individuals guaranteed Charter rights are
equally protected as guaranteed where you all have irrefutably proven your selves guilty as charged and
right now, at this very moment have been provided the opportunity to escape punishment by simply
commencing or causing to commence legitimate proceedings in “The Spirit of the Law” to prove to the
people “The Spirit” has risen and exists alive and well in all government personnel necessary to support
every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

No words and no debates, ACTION, nothing other will do. The menu is clear, no substitutes please.

It is a small price to pay for democracy and most assuredly the bill has been paid a gazillion times to the
infinitive with body and soul, and like all politicians and members of the Law Societies they will have
“More Please”

The Charter Democracy Force on behalf of the people state in the politest terms “No More” for any of you
and “No More” begging from us for what is rightfully ours.

From: Green Party of Canada [mailto:webadmin@greenparty.ca]


Sent: September 10, 2008 2:42 AM
To: franklyone@hotmail.com
Subject: This Isn't Over!

Join/Renew | Donate | Let Elizabeth Speak | Green Tax Shift | Vision Green | Contact Us

The decision to exclude Green Party leader Elizabeth May from the televised leaders' debates must not
stand.

This isn't just about Elizabeth and the Green Party any more. This is an all-out assault on one of the pillars
of our democracy -- the people's right to know.

Therefore, we are instituting legal action to find out, once and for all, whether Canada is the kind of country
where a group of television executives meeting in private can agree to let Stephen Harper and his old ally
Jack Layton decide which political views are allowed on the public air waves – our air waves.

410
We already know that millions of Canadians share our deep sense of outrage at this undemocratic,
unfair and, yes, un-Canadian decision and we are going to court to make sure that their voices are heard.

Don't let the Old Boys' Club tell you what you are allowed to see, what you are allowed to think. Help us to
fight this abomination and stand up for fairness and democracy.

Contribute to our Democracy Defenders Fund. Send $10, $20 or whatever you can afford and we'll
spend the money on the legal bills we will incur to mount our court challenge.

It's a small price to pay for democracy.

The Green Party of Canada Team

Join/Renew | Donate | Privacy Statement | Unsubscribe | Contact Us

Your subscribed email address is franklyone@hotmail.com.


To be removed from the GPC mailing list, click here.
copyright 2008 Green Party of Canada, 204-396 Cooper St., Ottawa, ON K2P 2H7
Toll-free: 1-866-868-3447 (1-866-VOTE-4-GPC)

POWERED BY PHPLIST V 2.10.4, © TINCAN LTD

THE FOLLOWING COMMENTARY WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE IN THE ORIGINAL E-MAIL TO THE GREEN PARTY

Why would I unsubscribe when they voluntarily provide us with what we need to know to properly convey
to the people what they need to know?

I strongly suspect they will unsubscribe me themselves presuming I already know far more than they need
me to know.

Well Elizabeth May, we do already know far more than we need to know about you and the Green Party
who are as concerned about Green ….Greenbacks as much as every other politician and members of the
Law Societies.

The people of the Lower Tier are concerned about all the Greenbacks you people abscond with no
intention of watching their backs.

Greenbacks in political and Law Society terms means give us your green and watch your back because we
like it and will be back for more.

411
January 1 2009

After writing and e-mailing the preceding September 10 2008 I received the RCMP Final Letter of
Disposition in the mail (Pages 416 & 417)

This is their summary of their investigation of the evidence contained in the original BLACK BOOK dated
September 1 2006, BLACK BOOK II (1) and this document BLACK BOOK II (2)

BLACK BOOK and BLACK BOOK II (1) is the evidence provided the RCMP from January 3 2006 to
November 8 2007 when I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP for refusing
to investigate Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy naming two RCMP members
who I had recently contacted at the time.

The RCMP chose to deal with the issues as if the two members acted on their own but ultimately they were acting
under guidance of higher authority being representatives of the RCMP and therefore expressed the ideology the
RCMP subscribe to and revealed their M.O. to be not consistent with the Constitution conducive to exemplary
support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits and in fact precisely adverse
to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights being obviously why they refuse to investigate government organized
crime of corruption and conspiracy with the RCMP upper echelon playing a major role.
RCMP Superintendent Robert Davis District Commander of the Greater Toronto Area signs his name to the
September 3 2008 Final Letter of Disposition claiming the two RCMP members are innocent of the charges, even
reluctant to use the words “refusing to investigate government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy” as he
finds them innocent and commends Inspector Verheul for his direction to SGT. Thomson while ultimately
concluding with a refusal to investigate government organized crime of corruprion and conspiracy” which he had to
wade through the evidence that was over his head to find the lame excuse for not doing so that is unfounded
unsupported by the evidence he drowned in.

The reign of GOVERNMENT ORGANIZED CRIME IS OVER irrefutably documented as they


demonstrated for everyone to see that their MODUS OPERANDI is adverse to the CONSTITUTION and
every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

There are other editions of the BLACK BOOK soon to follow that cover the correspondence since
September 3 2008 which implicates the Ontario Lieutenant Governor and the Governor General.

The BLACK BOOK series is available to download at the www.URus.ca site for a short time and I highly
suggest every person fortunate to have had this opportunity to read the evidence download it before the
government conspirators make it vanish or I do.

Be aware that the material in the BLACK BOOK editions is copyright protected but may be used to
circulate among your friends for the intended purpose of eradicating the amoral inclination deeply
embedded in OUR GOVERNMENT that the nefarious bent have pirated and use as their own against us.

Eventually I will find the time to edit and add missing pertinent documents but there is more than
sufficient to bring these hoodlums before the people to stand trial in OUR COURTS that will be
scrutinized for consistency with the Constitution and OUR CHARTER RIGHTS.

Continued in BLACK BOOK III

The Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP Connection

412
413
414

You might also like