January 3 2009 To: GLIST www.uRus.

ca Confucius 551 BC – 479 BC There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEIOSNESS and MORALITY … finally I began to make out was written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE Golden Rule “Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself”

Jesus
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”

Retracement of present day Government Organized Crime
Ring Leaders Parliament of Canada 1982 The Constitution Act, 1982 Scheme The Set Up Under the Façade of Democracy Part, 1 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada - Lawyers Rules of Conduct 103) Interpretation (f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit as well as in the letter. "The Letter of the Law" in the first statement of Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms clearly cedes to the supremacy of God, and Jesus of world renown summarized the aspirations attributed to God as "The Golden Rule" obviously "The Spirit of the Law". Where there is conflict between "The Spirit of the Law" and "The Letter of the Law" "The Spirit of the Law" has superiority clearly stated in "The Letter of the Law", where sane moral thought and reason is either stated or implied giving credence to that which is least apt to be mistaken by humankind whereas to be human is to err, there can be no mistaking the meaning and intention of The Golden Rule as words put to paper by people can be unintentionally ambiguous, adverse to "The Spirit of the Law" inconsistent with the Constitution, either erroneously or deliberately placed for nefarious intent or deliberately interpreted inconsistent with the Constitution, but of no force or effect 1

The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law. Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process.

The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.
According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law.

The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"

publicly disclosed laws 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

2

Common knowledge for interpretation of the Constitution Act, 1982

Principles: main beliefs, values, philosophy, ideology, morality, ethics, doctrine, principle Supremacy: pre-eminence, ascendancy, primacy, superiority, domination, incomparability, dominance

Charter: contract, license, deed, agreement, bond, hire, rent, employ Democracy: social equality, equality, egalitarianism
Egalitarianism: parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality Spirit: strength, courage, character, guts, will, strength of mind, Force, fortitude Justice: fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even- handedness, fair dealing, honesty, integrity Consistency: constancy, steadiness, reliability, uniformity, evenness, stability, regularity

Osmosis: the gradual, often unconscious, absorption of knowledge or ideas through continual
exposure rather than deliberate learning

3

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. 2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association. 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. 24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances. 31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority. 32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

4

Consistency Mandatory
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. Consistency in "The Spirit of the Law"= the Golden Rule Consistency is obviously mandatory to meet the terms of the Charter, in particular s. 15.(1) and s.52.(1) To meet the terms of the "Letter of the Law" consistency is imperative where "The Letter of the Law" clearly recognizes the supremacy of God . "The Spirit of the Law" has priority over "The Letter of the Law" and where there is perceived to be conflict "The Spirit of the Law" must prevail throughout the legal system to maintain legal certainty of justice and equal protection and benefits of the law whereas the key players, the members of the Law Societies, government and private sector must be competent, responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction to the support of every individual's guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. Clearly The Golden Rule is "The Spirit of the Law" consistent with democracy, justice, principles, “The Letter of the Law” and “The Rule of Law” A sane person of moral legitimate thought and reason could not possibly find words to better define “The Spirit of Democracy” and “The Spirit of the Law” than the Golden Rule that could not be fairer or simpler to comprehend where credence must be to that, which is least apt to be mistaken by humankind as all persons in matters of law presumed human and sane should have no misunderstanding as to what is receptive and non receptive to each other. It is irrelevant whether or not God exists or whether or not one believes he exists as it does not matter what one believes as long as they are CONSISTENTLY in, of and with "The Spirit of the Law" A person's safety and wellbeing is the most valuable possession every individual has and must be treated with the respect they are entitled to as equals guaranteed by law. It is every individual's responsibility to abide by the law that ultimately protects every individual and it is the responsibility of the federal and provincial governments who signed the Constitution to consistently demonstrate due diligence to every individual's guaranteed Charter rights ensuring every individual abides by the law. We are all human requiring the same necessities of life and would have to be insane not to know what is receptive and non-receptive of others Sanity must CONSISTENTLY prevail in "The Spirit of the Law"

5

Confucius 551 BC - 479 BC born to poverty rose to dine with kings experiencing all walks of life gave us the Golden Rule "Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself" and "Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness" Jesus confirmed the Golden Rule in paraphrase as the summary of the aspirations attributed to God

"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"
The purpose of Law and Order is to define the law and enforce it. In the case of the Constitution priority one is to every individual's guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits

The Presumption of Innocence
Every Canadian individual is required by the Constitution to be in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” and is responsible to have an excellent understanding of “The Spirit of the Law” whereas it could not be fairer or simpler to comprehend and be judged by as we are all human knowing full well what is receptive and non receptive to each other where credence must be to that which is least apt to be mistaken by humankind. Attentiveness to the Obvious 1) The concept is founded on the understanding that every individual must be responsible for his or her actions in compliance with “The Spirit of the Law” thereby protecting every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. 2) Simultaneously every individual has a primal instinct and obvious responsibility to provide for oneself as the necessities of life are predetermined as are the certainty of ones actions obstructed from their acquisition. It is absurd to presume that just by enacting the Constitution defining every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights that every individual will immediately succumb to “The Spirit of the Law” as reality attests with primal instinct ever present and society humongously burdened to finance a government of the people’s representatives staffed with competent responsible irreproachable people to provide the necessities of a sane moral society with “Attentiveness to the Obvious” 1) The Constitution: Document…”The Spirit of the Law” founded of sane moral thought and reason…Self - Evident…”Attentive to the Obvious”… The catalyst to the Ideal that is simply reality sanely dealt with. 2) Simultaneously the Constitution: Establishment must be staffed with personnel in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law adept to responsibly administer and enforce the provisions of the Charter that guarantees every individual equal rights of protection and benefit unobstructed, conducive to every person’s rights of equal opportunity to provide for themselves. Clearly prerequisite to a sane moral responsible society demanded of the Constitution: Document is a sane moral responsible Constitution: Establishment that ultimately demands a sane moral responsible legal system that must be able to demonstrate due diligence to the obligations demanded of the Constitution: Document adept to materialize “The Spirit of the Law” in every Canadian individual 6

whereas due punishment attentive to deterrence is the only viable means to protect every individual equally as guaranteed in the provisions of the Charter with due regard to “Cause and Effect”

The Root of the Problem
It is not enough to consistently deal with symptoms without persistent Attentiveness to the Obvious whereas all laws enacted must be consistent with the Constitution and all policies and standards that are routinely carried out must be reassessed where reasonable evidence is presented of inconsistency with the Constitution whereas “The Spirit of the Law” has priority over any “Letter of the Law” where when all is said and done “The Spirit of the Law” must be clearly present in the final decisions made under the auspices of the Constitution in respect of the Constitution founded of sane moral thought and reason in CONSISTENT support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. Ultimately the Constitution: Document does not enforce or finance itself where efficiency and cost effectiveness must be consistently monitored where all undue costs are deprivations to the taxpayer and illegal in contravention of their guaranteed Charter rights not to be deprived of what legally belongs to them which includes their guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. Where ignorance is no excuse in matters of law it is a reasonable presumption that every individual knows the law and are in consistently in compliance with the law where this is not a game with rules of engagement where the criminal element is permitted to say “No Fairsies” or you did not say “Simon Says” because everyone is to be considered of sane mind until proven otherwise and must be dealt with on that perspective whereas with the presumption of innocence under the auspices of the Constitution is the presumption of cooperation with the law enforcement that has been financed and established to protect every person equally including a person who has reasonable evidence provided to the enforcers of the law that suggests otherwise. Obviously a person who does not cooperate with law enforcement is noy contributing their fair share and persons having not yet entered the working force are being equally protected by the taxpayer who at the very least deserves the respect of every individual for providing a system to protect everyone. I reiterate that when an individual has reasonable evidence provided against them of non compliance with “The Spirit of the Law” it is the responsibility of the law enforcement to follow up on it as efficiently and cost effectively as possible and it is the responsibility of the alleged to cooperate in every way to confirm the presumption of innocence as an innocent person ultimately would have nothing to hide, and in fact would be anxious to help the enforcement prove their innocence as quickly as possible, deduced from sane moral thought and reason consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits, being the purpose of enforcement to nip amoral inclination in the bud when it is the most efficiently and cost effectively dealt with as the ultimate goal is to transform the entire populace to “The Spirit of the Law” that guarantees every individual their guaranteed rights of equal protection and benefits. Mess with “The Spirit of the Law” and pay all the consequences. Not the people, who have no evidence provided against them to suggest that they are not consistent with “The Spirit of the Law”

7

In matters of law that deals with humankind due regard for human nature must be sanely addressed with moral thought and reason where reality is all there is and the minds of humankind all there is to deal with it. What remains of actions passed is the reality where careful examination of all evidence available of the intended goal lay wrapped within “The Spirit of the Law” as defined on the previous pages that remains today as existed since 1982 whereas reality is “Self – Evident “The Spirit of the Law” is not “The Spirit of the Establishment” whereas they will persistently proclaim in charlatan spiel they are one and the same despite the evidence that surrounds them, as that is their way irrefutably documented in the 2 part Law Society f Upper Canada document published many places for all to see, even they who would have me believe they assessed it to the truth the evidence irrefutably proclaims. Everywhere is their reality that they created and cannot hide from and never could as they created diversions that will not disappear like the Constitution: Document and the nefarious bent of the Constitution: Establishment a misnomer….A serious case of stolen identity to steal from the people to finance their entire overhead as they administer, enforce and cause to flourish organized crime. In Ontario it is operated out of the Law Society of Upper Canada, a flourishing business fronted on false pretense gaining the trust and money of the people to build an empire of superfluity that sucks society dry to the humongous benefit of all members of the Law Society that would flourish even greater in the coming years as more people of the Middle Class succumb to the insanity of their reality as poverty will flourish, hopelessness and despair the symptoms that gnaw on primary instinct that encourages amoral inclination that advances to criminal life style leaving many victims in their wake that the government legal system refuses to address citing “Threshold” we do not have to deal with the issues until many victims fall where they lay in wait for the criminal to advance his or her prowess and dares venture where the bigger money is that they deliberately wait for having so many victims to select from why waste there time on the people of the Middle Class who cannot afford their exorbitant costs for themselves but are made to finance the defense of the persons they deliberately sent into or left in poverty to provide them the bread and butter they ransack from the illegitimate Legal Aid system that is demonstrably adverse to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. The members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who do not give a damn about every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of the sane more society initiate long court debates with deliberately incompetent laws riddled with ambiguity, loopholes and inconsistencies with the Constitution illegitimately using the moral societies individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits with the entire platter of Charter rights to protect the criminal element that obviously has reasonable evidence against them that are only entitled to the rights in sections 8 - 14 and subject only in section 1 and except in section 7 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

8

My evidence and reality itself attests to their nefarious bent deliberately leaving the loopholes, ambiguity and inconsistencies available for them who can afford the exorbitant costs of lawyers and the illegitimate legal system purposely structured that way providing the wealthy a humongous advantage over the people of the Lower Tier and the luxurious lifestyles of the members of the Law Societies. And who has more money than the government absconded from the people who they lead to believe they provide a legitimate legal system consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. The people believe it because individual’s like me who have become victim and attempt to access the system discover what the prominent judges and Attorney General Chris Bentley readily admitted on the front page of the July 26 2008 Toronto Saturday Star that the Legal Aid system is in desperate need of being filled up by the Middle Class again who cannot afford to access the system themselves. They blatantly admit in these troubled times they are after big raises when a humongous number of individuals in the private sector have great concern for their jobs with costs of living destined to increase significantly certain to increase the numbers living in poverty and the government members of the Law Society gives the wealthy oil companies a 40 billion dollar tax break while they made 10 billion in profit in about three months as they ransacked society. The media cooperate with government and refuse to print the truth that I have provided them being a humongous cover up as the nefarious bent are wont to do.

A legitimate legal system consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights would not have condoned the criminally fraudulent offences committed at the ORHT June 30 2005,or the action of the ORHT, the IEU and the Minister of Municipal Affairs referenced in Lawyer File #s 1-3. The office of the Ontario Attorney General is obviously behind that as the Attorney General is their legal advisor (Lawyer File # 7) as well as all Cabinet Ministers, government departments and agencies, including the police. The DOJ Minister of Justice and Attorney General lied in their January 22 2007 letter stating they could not intervene in provincial matters while the RCMP are under their authority with RCMP stationed throughout Ontario and Canada. The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP is a federal government agency and the Minister of Public Safety is a Minister advised by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and former Minister Stockwell Day informed me that he was accountable to the public and Parliament for the actions of the RCMP. The RCMP carried out a ten month study of my evidence that irrefutably proves government organized cime of corruption and conspiracy, which alone proves the DOJ Minister of Justice and Attorney General has authority to intervene in provincial matters but of course the RCMP under his authority attempted to apply their charlatan modus operandi of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration of the legal system to find the RCMP not guilty of refusing to investigate government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy admitting that he tiptoed amongst the evidence, 9

deliberately ignoring it in the pretext of looking into two RCMP officers who had refused to investigate under the direction of the superiors of the RCMP. Bottom line is they still refuse to investigate the irrefutable evidence of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy where the entire government upper echelon are involved. That he even admits not intending to attempting to belittle the fact that I stand alone and claim every government personnel that refuses to address the issues is on the conspiracy and as the evidence is irrefutable that they are all involved what as can the truth be and what else can they all say being allof them against me, just one individual demonstrating what is involved to get the justice guaranteed me. Their legitimate mandate is to protect every individual as guaranteed not protect the criminal element with illegitimate use of our guaranteed Charter rights. They all thrive off the criminal element and victims so why would they stop the criminals and protect the individuals. Hell to do that they would have to lock themselves up but it is just not in the plans of the nefarious bent. These people mess with the stock markets having the advantage of insider information and the politicians decisions are influenced by the affluent and obviously the corporations which brings me back to a serious issue when first I presented the evidence to Inspector Peter Goulet of the RCMP who acknowledged receipt January 3 2006 accepting it under the auspices of the Canada Business Corporations Act that Sgt. Michael Thomson reiterated in report to me of January 18 2006 when he declined on behalf of the RCMP to investigate stating he had consulted with the DOJ and they determined it was my responsibility to deal with it in Civil action under the Canada Corporations Business Act. The situation is no different whether it is under the Canada Corporations Business Act, or the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 as all laws must be consistent with the Constitution conducive to the safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter and ultimately the govern personnel are charged with the responsibility to protect the people and the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” although filled of inconsistencies with the Constitution and no mention of our Charter rights published on the Ontario site today clearly states he is responsible as “guardian of the public interest” Instead of him dealing with the issues as required by the supreme law of Canada with nobody to make him responsible he turns the publics safety into the hands of every individual who becomes a victim stating get a lawyer and handle the problems yourself. The government refuses to protect us as guaranteed and then when we become a victim the throw us to the wolves their friends of the Law Society of Upper Canada and if we cannot afford to pay their exorbitant extortion prices, too bad, they have helped me with all the resources available to me. When people like me refuse to sell their houses or go in to debt for that which already belongs to them … their guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection it further exasperates the situation leaving one more criminal on the loose to hone his or her skills leaving many more victims in their wake absolutely adverse to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of protection. 10

My case is just an example of their unscrupulous ways clearly documenting their modus operandi adverse to the Constitution but hardly did they go to so much trouble to obstruct me for the money involved for it is all about the extraordinary money involved in their ransacking of society where the argument with a lady of the street about a price is not whether or not she is a prostitute. The point that has been made in my case is that they are irrefutably government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy with not one government department, agency or police force prepared to stand up for the Constitution or its people having personal use for the Canadian Taxpayer’s money where the amount they scam from the people is astronomical incalculable in dollars and cents that expands well into deliberate inhumanities, poverty, hopelessness and despair that begets criminals and victims that these bloodsuckers thrive on . The BLACK BOOK (Portfolio) PDF contains the irrefutable evidence of government organized crime corruption and conspiracy. Contents BLACK BOOK I The original BLACK BOOK of irrefutable evidence provided to the RCMP dated September 1 2006 BLACK BOOK II (1) Additional irrefutable evidence provided to the RCMP up until November 8 2008 when I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP for refusing to investigate government corruption and conspiracy. BLACK BOOK II (2) Evidence provided to the RCMP during the term of their 10 month study of the evidence November 8 2007 to September 3 2008, the date of the absurd 1 ½ page of contents, RCMP Final Letter of Disposition being in itself the conclusive proof that the RCMP refuse to investigate government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy that clearly links them, the DOJ and the federal government to the conspiracy BLACK BOOK III Evidence and response to the REVIEWS Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP that links them back to the DOJ and the federal government I filed with reviews on September 23 2008 and responded to their absurd Final Report of December 23 2008

Conclusion The Government is guilty as alleged and irrefutably proven

11

PDF files

The BLACKBOOK (Portfolio) is available on the www.uRus.ca site via the Download tab where other pertinent evidence is available OR

Should you require more evidence just ask. Once you are coherent to “The Spirit of the Law” evidence of the government organized crime is visible where it has always been, surrounding you, Reality itself so distanced from the Ideal that is simply a matter of sanely dealing with reality that is the responsibility of the governments having being charged with the responsibility and binding upon their acceptance of financial benefit.

.

12

13

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful