Master Studies in Finance
Spring 2014
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
MANAGEMENT
Lecture 3
The information asymmetry
Ewa Kania, Department of Banking
1. Asymmetric information problem
Asymmetric information refers to the situation where one
party to a transaction has less information than the other party,
and thus is unable to make an accurate decision. This is an
important aspect of most types of transactions, and particularly
of financial markets.
E.g., investors have much less information than the managers of
the issuer of financial securities, as they do not know how good
the projects to be financed are, and they are not able to properly
evaluate the risks and returns of these projects.
Also, life insurance companies do not know the precise health
of the purchaser. Similarly, banks do not know how likely a
borrower is to repay.
The subject of asymmetric information can be ex-ante (adverse
selection) or ex-post (moral hazard). 3 4
Moral hazard (or hidden action) is the problem after the
transaction is made. It is the risk (hazard) that the borrower
will engage in activities that are undesirable (immoral) for the
lender.
These activities reduce the probability that the loan will be
repaid. The consequence is that lenders may decide not to
make any loans.
Investors are more likely to behave differently when using
borrowed funds rather than when using their own funds.
In general, moral hazard arises when a contract or financial
arrangement creates incentives for parties to behave against
the interest of others.
5 6
Overview
1. Asymmetric information problem
2. How to solve the problems arising from
adverse selection?
2
Adverse selection is the problem created by asymmetric
information before the transaction occurs.
It arises when the potential borrowers who are most likely to
produce an undesirable (adverse) outcome are the ones who
most actively seek out loans. As a consequence, lenders may
decide not to give any loans, even to good credit risks.
One possible solution to the adverse selection problem is to
offer a warranty, as it would be viewed as a signal of quality:
signalling refers to actions of the informed party in an
adverse selection problem.
The action undertaken by the less informed party to determine
the information possessed by informed party is called
screening (for example, the action taken by an insurance
company to gather information about the health history of
potential customers).
How adverse selection influences financial structure
The adverse selection problem mainly concerns the securities
market (stocks and bonds), where issuers have more
information than potential investors.
When individual borrowers (firms) have private information
on the projects they wish to finance, the functioning of the
market can be inefficient.
Given that a potential investor is not able to distinguish good
(high return/low risk) and bad (low returns/high risk) firms, he
is inclined to pay a price reflecting the average quality.
The owners (managers) of good firms know that their
securities are undervalued at this price, and they are not
willing to sell. Only bad firms are willing to sell at this price.
The consequence is that the potential investor has problems in
selecting the firms, and thus is most likely to decide not to buy
any security in the market.

These asymmetries impede the functioning of financial
markets: they can either obstruct the conclusion of transactions
(and cause the collapse of the market), or influence the level
(and the quality) of production activities.
Although the existence of organised financial markets partially
reduces some of these problems, the solution to them has been
the emergence of financial intermediaries.
The adverse selection problem explains one empirical fact:
why marketable securities and stocks in particular are not
the primary source of external financing for firms.
7 8
2. How to solve the problems arising
from adverse selection?
Full information on the borrowers should be provided to the
lenders. The following tools can be used:
A. Private production and sale of information
B. Government regulation
C. Financial intermediaries
A. Private companies can produce and sell the information needed
to distinguish good and bad firms and to select their securities.
E.g., S&Ps categorises corporate bond issuers into major classes
according to perceived credit quality. The first four quality ratings
AAA, AA, A, BBB indicate quality investment borrowers.
9 10
B. Governments take steps to ensure that firms disclose full
information to potential investors. In fact, financial markets are
among the most heavily regulated sectors in the economy.
In the U.S., the Securities and Exchange Commission is the
government agency entrusted to promote the adherence to
standard accounting principles and disclosure of information.
However, disclosure requirements do no solve the adverse
selection problem, as the collapse of the Enron Corporation
demonstrates.
11
Principalagent problem
This is also related to the problem of incentive structures. The
problem arises because the agent often has superior
information and expertise (which may be the reason the
principal employs them).
Agency problems also arise because the agent cannot be
efficiently or costlessly monitored. The agency costs involved
can act as a serious deterrent to financial contracting with
resultant losses. The challenge is to create financial contracts
that align the interests of the principal and the agent.
A typical example of principalagent problem refers to a
situation of separation of ownership and control in a firm.
Managers (the agents) may act in their own interest rather than
in the interest of shareholders (the principals) because the
managers have less incentive to maximise profits than
shareholders.
Adverse selection is not completely solved by the private
production and sale of information because of the free-rider
problem. This occurs when people who do not pay for
information take advantage of information acquired by other
people.
If you buy the information on the quality of firms, you can use it
to purchase undervalued securities of good firms. However, other
investors who have not purchased the information, may observe
your behaviour and buy the same security at the same time.
The increase in the demand for the undervalued security will
cause a build-up in its price to the true value. The effect is to
negate the value of information.
The free-rider problem explains why investors are reluctant to
buy information. Thus the adverse selection problem remains.
C. Financial intermediaries, and especially banks, produce more
accurate valuations of firms and are able to select good credit
risks thanks to their expertise in information production.
One advantage of banks is that they can have information
about potential borrowers from the transactions on their bank
accounts: banks obtain a profile of the suitability for credit (and
ability to repay the loan) from the accounts of their customers.
By acquiring funds from depositors and lending them to good
firms, banks earn higher returns on their loans than the interest
paid to their depositors.
Banks are able to avoid the free-rider problem because their
loans are private securities, not traded in the open financial
market.
12
 Moreover, banks reduce the adverse selection problem by
asking the borrower to provide collateral against the loan.
Collateral is property promised to the lender if the borrower
defaults. Thus,
it reduces the losses of the lender in the event of a default.
Therefore, financial intermediaries solve the adverse
selection problem, whereas the private production of
information and government regulation only reduce it.
The presence of adverse selection explains:
1. why bank loans are the most important source of funds raised
externally,
2. why indirect finance is more important than direct finance.
13
A. Stockholders can engage in the monitoring (auditing) of firms
activities to reduce moral hazard. Monitoring is needed:
to ensure that information asymmetry is not exploited by one
party at the expenses of the other,
because the value of equity contracts cannot be certain when the
contract is made,
because the value of many financial contracts (i.e., future return
on a stock) cannot be observed or verified at the moment of
purchase, and the post-contract behaviour of a counterparty
determines the ultimate value of the contract,
the long-term nature of many financial contracts implies that
information acquired before the contract is agreed may become
irrelevant at the maturity due to changes in conditions.
15
C. Financial intermediaries operating in the equity market are
able to avoid the free-rider problem in the face of moral hazard.
Venture capital firms use the funds of their partner firms to help
entrepreneurs to start new businesses; in exchange for the use of
the venture capital, the firm receives an equity share in the new
business.
Venture capital firms have their people participating in the
management of the firm (i.e., easier profit verification and thus
lower moral hazard).
Moreover, the equity in the firm is not marketable to anyone but
the venture capital firm (i.e., elimination of the free-riding of
other investors).
17
Moral hazard in debt contracts is lower than in equity
contracts but still present. Debt contracts require borrowers to
pay fixed amounts and let them keep any profit above this
amount. Consequently, borrowers have incentives to take
investments riskier than lenders would like.
How to reduce/solve the problems arising from moral hazard in
equity markets?
Several tools can be used:
A. Monitoring
B. Government regulation to increase information
C. Financial intermediaries active in the equity market
D. Debt contracts
14
Monitoring is expensive in terms of money and time (a costly
state verification). If you know that other stockholders are
paying to monitor the activities of the firm you hold stocks in,
you can free ride on the activities of the others.
As every stockholder can free ride on others, this reduces the
amount of monitoring that would reduce the moral hazard
(principalagent) problem. This is the same as with adverse
selection and makes equity contracts less desirable.
B. Governments have incentives to reduce the moral hazard
problem. Several measures are used: laws to force firms to
adhere to standard accounting principles (i.e., to make profit
verification easier); laws to impose penalties on people who
commit the fraud of hiding/stealing profits.
16
D. Debt contracts are a way to reduce moral hazard. Moral hazard
affects equity contracts because they are claims on profits in all
situations, whether the firm makes or loses money.
Consequently, there is the need to structure a contract that
confines moral hazard to certain situations, and reduces the need
to monitor managers.
This is a contractual agreement to pay the lender a fixed amount
of money independently from the profits of the firm. Hence,
debt contracts are preferred to equity contracts. The presence of
moral hazard in equity markets explains why stocks are not the
most important external source of financing for firms.
18

How to reduce/solve the moral hazard problems in debt markets?
Although debt contracts reduce the amount of moral hazard in
comparison to equity contracts, they do not solve the problem.
Borrowers have incentives to take investments riskier than
lenders would like: borrowers get all the gains from a risky
investments if they succeed, but lenders lose most, if not all,
of their loan, if borrowers fail.
The solution to the problems of moral hazard lies again in financial
intermediaries. However, other tools also can be used:
A. making debt contract incentivecompatible
(i.e., aligning the incentives of borrowers and lenders),
B. monitoring and enforcement of restrictive covenants.
19
2. Those which encourage desirable behaviour from the
lenders point of view. One example is a mortgage loan with a
provision that requires the borrower to purchase life insurance
that pays off the loan in the event of the borrowers death.
3. Covenants that keep collateral valuable.
4. Covenants that provide information about the activities of
the borrowing firm, such as quarterly accounting and income
reports.
The presence of covenants reduces moral hazard problems and
explains why debt contracts are often complicated legal
documents.
21
Banks have a comparative advantage relative to direct lending
in monitoring activities in the context of costly state
verification. In fact, they have a better ability to reduce
monitoring costs because of their diversification.
Several conditions are required for delegated monitoring to
work:
existence of scale economies in monitoring, i.e., a typical
bank finances many projects,
small capacity of investors as compared to the size of
investments, i.e., each project needs the funds of several
investors,
low cost of delegation, i.e., the cost of monitoring the
financial intermediary itself has to be less than the surplus
gained from exploiting scale economies in monitoring
investment projects.
23
A. Investors are more likely to take on riskier investment projects
when using borrowed funds than when using their own funds.
Thus the moral hazard problem can be reduced by increasing
the stake of personal net worth (the difference between
personal assets and liabilities).
B. A restrictive covenant is a provision aimed at restricting the
borrowers activity. There are four types of possible covenants:
1. Those which discourage undesirable behaviour by the
borrower (i.e. not to undertake risky investment projects).
Examples:
to use the debt contract only to finance specific activities,
such as the purchase of a fixed asset;
to prohibit the firm from issuing new debt, or disposing
of its assets;
to restrict dividend payments if some ratios have not reached
a critical level;
to limit purchases of major assets or merger activities. 20
Covenants do not eliminate moral hazard problems: it is not
possible to rule out every risky activity. Moreover, covenants must
be monitored and enforced. Monitoring typically involves
increasing returns to scale, which implies that it is more efficiently
performed by specialised financial institutions. Individual lenders
tend to delegate the monitoring activities instead of performing
them directly. Thus the monitor has to be given an incentive to do
its job properly.
However, because monitoring and enforcement are costly, investors
can free-ride on those activities undertaken by other investors.
Thus in the bond market (as well as in the stock market) the free-
rider problem arises. The consequence will be that insufficient
resources will be devoted to these activities.
Financial intermediaries, and especially banks, can be seen to
provide solutions both to the incentive problem and to the free-rider
problem.
22
Note:
1. Stocks are not the most important source of external financing.
2. Marketable securities are not the primary source of finance.
3. Indirect finance is more important than direct finance.
4. Banks are the most important source of external funds.
5. The financial system is heavily regulated.
6. Only large, well-established firms have access to securities markets.
7. Collateral is prevalent in debt contracts.
8. Debt contracts have numerous restrictive covenants.
24