You are on page 1of 2

Minimizing

Aflatoxin in Corn
Aflatoxin is a naturally occurring winter on plant residue on the soil. Mississippi research indicates corn
toxic chemical by-product from the However, management practices will normally lose around 0.6 per-
growth of the fungus Aspergillus intending to reduce the inoculum cent moisture per day during the
flavus on corn and other crops such level have little impact on aflatox- dry-down period. This rate is not
as peanuts and cottonseed. Grain in development in subsequent influenced much by hybrid maturi-
containing aflatoxin is toxic to ani- years, because the fungus is abun- ty. Thus, you can reduce field
mals, especially young animals and dant in the Midsouth nearly every exposure by at least 1 to 2 1/2 weeks
poultry; therefore, facilities that year. by harvesting corn at 20 to 25 per-
handle grain routinely test loads cent moisture, compared to letting
Management Practices
before accepting delivery. the corn dry in the field to 15 per-
Aflatoxin problems are more Aflatoxin develops in the field
cent moisture.
likely in Mississippi than in the when corn is exposed to severe
The disadvantage of early har-
Corn Belt, because the states hot, environmental conditions known
vest is that wet, warm grain is an
humid climate is ideal for fungal to stress kernel development and
ideal environment for rapid afla-
growth. Also, little hybrid resist- promote fungal infection within
toxin escalation if it is not handled
ance exists and few if any deconta- the ear. Management practices that
properly. Dry your high-moisture
mination methods have proven improve plant health strongly dis-
grain (16-30 percent) to below 15
successful and been granted feder- courage aflatoxin development.
percent moisture within 24 hours
al approval. Timely planting, adequate fertil-
after harvest or immediately haul
ity, good weed and insect control,
Stressful Conditions the grain to an elevator (that will
supplemental irrigation, suitable
dry the grain).
The Midsouths climatic condi- plant population, and hybrid selec-
tions dictate that aflatoxin potential tion should help reduce aflatoxin Storage
will continue to threaten corn pro- potential. Although hybrid evalua- Do not store grain in trucks,
ducers until control measures are tions conducted in Mississippi in combines, bins, or any nonaerated
identified. Aflatoxin problems 1998 indicated little aflatoxin site for more than 4 to 6 hours.
have historically developed during resistance in commercially avail- These conditions quickly escalate
years with severe high-temperature able hybrids, hybrids that perform aflatoxin levels and deteriorate
stress, particularly when coupled well in drought conditions general- grain quality, because fungal
with water deficiency and insect ly have lower aflatoxin concentra- growth and grain respiration will
ear and stalk damage. In 1977 and tion than hybrids that yield poorly rise quickly in high-moisture grain,
1998, Mississippi had severe prob- in drought conditions.
particularly with normal Missis-
lems with aflatoxin-contaminated
Harvest Timing sippi August and early September
corn.
Producers may reduce the likeli- air temperatures.
You can minimize the likelihood
hood of aflatoxin buildup in the Conversely, aflatoxin approach-
of developing a problem by using
field by harvesting corn before it es dormant levels when grain
sound agronomic practices, prop-
reaches the industry standard of moisture drops to about 12 percent,
erly storing and drying grain,
maintaining grain quality, and san- 15.5 percent moisture.This system especially when air temperatures
itizing grain-handling equipment. reduces duration when ears may be decline to around 55 F. If you plan
Aflatoxin can infect corn by air- exposed to unfavorable drying to dry the grain yourself, do not
borne spores in the field during conditions that promote aflatoxin harvest more corn than you can dry
grain filling or during storage and development in the field. Corn within these constraints.
handling. Kernel infection may reaches physiological maturity at Aflatoxin problems often devel-
occur through the silk, cob, or about 30 percent moisture and can op in grain bins being used to dry
direct contact. Fungus spores over- be harvested any time thereafter. corn. You must minimize grain
depth (commonly 3-6 feet deep) to contamination sources. Spores cent), but concentration in individ-
quickly dry high-moisture corn from fungi on infected grain may ual kernels is often very high.
using in-bin drying system. Stir- readily disperse during handling, You may improve sampling by
ring devices may assist drying but contaminating subsequent grain. A increasing the sample size and
cannot overcome aeration prob- chlorine cleaning solution (3/4 cup using proper sampling techniques.
lems that limit the drying rate in bleach/gallon of water) kills fungal Chemical extraction of aflatoxin
deep-layered grain. Other drying growth on handling facilities. requires grinding the grain sample.
systems, such as continuous flow Testers should grind the original
Detection
and portable batch driers, normally sample before a subsample is re-
Methods historically used for moved. This improves distribution
dry grain within these constraints,
aflatoxin detection range from of contaminated particles to the
if harvest capacity does not exceed
visual observations to complex lab subsample. Testers may also grind
volume of the drying system.
analyses. A black light test uses particles finer, increase the size of
Harvest and Handling long-wave ultraviolet light to illu- the subsample, and increase num-
Practices minate a bright yellow-green fluo- ber of analyses per sample to
You may improve grain quality rescence indicative of a fungal reduce variability. The latter two
by altering harvest and handling metabolism product that often pre-
recommendations, however, will
procedures. Fungi readily invade ludes aflatoxin. This product is
increase the time and expense
kernels with cracked or damaged called Kojic acid and should not be
involved with the analytical proce-
seed coats. If you suspect a prob- confused with aflatoxin. The
dure and may be impractical in
lem, keep obviously stressed, black light test has limited use;
some situations.
stunted, or damaged areas and field use only as a preliminary test to a
edges from healthy corn. more accurate chemical analysis. Action Levels
Increasing fan speed, opening Elevators or grain markets The United States Food and
should use chemical analyses to Drug Administration action levels
sieves, and reducing ground speed
determine aflatoxin content. You for corn contaminated with afla-
help enhance grain quality collect-
may also submit samples for toxin establish guidelines for spe-
ed by a combine. Postharvest
analysis to the State Chemical Lab
screen cleaners and gravity separa- cific uses. Research indicates that
or buy an aflatoxin test kit from
tors help reduce moderate aflatoxin aflatoxin-contaminated corn within
chemical supply companies.
levels (50 to 100 ppb) below the these action levels will not injure
FDA standard (20 ppb). Sampling and Testing the health of specific animals listed
Daily clean out corn and debris Substantial aflatoxin testing or humans consuming foods de-
left in combines, trucks, pits, grain variability is common because few rived from these animals.
carts, and augers; clean bins before kernels are normally contaminated
use because these are potential with aflatoxin (less than 0.1 per-

FDA action levels for aflatoxin-contaminated corn include the following:

Maximum level Use


20 ppb: Human food, feed for immature animals (including
poultry) or dairy animals, or unknown destination
100 ppb: Feed for breeding cattle, breeding swine, or poultry
200 ppb: Feed for finishing swine of greater than 100 pounds
300 ppb: Feed for finishing beef cattle

www.ext.msstate.edu
By Dr. Erick Larson, Extension Corn Specialist
Mississippi State University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, or veteran status.
Information Sheet 1563
Extension Service of Mississippi State University, cooperating with U.S. Department of Agriculture. Published in furtherance of Acts of
Congress, May 8 and June 30, 1914. RONALD A. BROWN, Director (rev-1M-3-00)

You might also like