PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.

net Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

Human Rights Alert

Digitally signed by Joseph Zernik DN: cn=Joseph Zernik, o, ou, email=jz12345@e arthlink.net, c=US Date: 2010.07.27 20:27:44 +03'00'

10-07-26 Solicitation of Representation by Harvard Law School Dean, Martha Minow, in action at the Supreme Court of the United States.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:11:11 +0300 To: "Martha Minow" <minow@law.harvard.edu> From: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net> Subject: Request for counsel representation in Re: William Suter, Clerk of the US Supreme Court Asked to Certify, Provide Copies of Dockets in re: Richard Fine, Orly Taitz Martha Minow, Dean Harvard Law School By email RE: Request for counsel representation in Re: William Suter, Clerk of the US Supreme Court Asked to Certify, Provide Copies of Dockets in re: Richard Fine, Orly Taitz Dear Prof Minow: I am writing to ask whether you would consider representing me in original action at the US Supreme Court, in case (which is likely) that Clerk William Suter denies access to records of the US Supreme Court, which appear to include evidence of misprision of clerk in actions related to the former US prosecutor Richard Fine. Richard Fine has been imprisoned in solitary confinement for the past 17 months in Los Angeles, California, with no warrant ever issued, and no judgment/ conviction/ sentencing ever entered, after he exposed widespread corruption of California judges. The case must be deemed serious violation of Human Rights. The abuse is not only of Richard Fine himself, but what it stands for - intimidation of counsel who stood for the rights of the people, and collusion of the courts at all levels in creating false public representations that his imprisonment was reviewed by the courts and was found in compliance with the law. The issues raised by the case fall squarely in your field of expertise - Human Rights in societies in transition. The courts transitioned to internet based publication of dockets - albeit with no validation of such systems and with no Local Rules of Courts to govern such practices. The courts publish online records, which the courts themselves never deemed valid court records, but which media and the public at large falsely assume are true and valid court records. In parallel, the courts are restricting access to true court records. In the process, precipitous deterioration in integrity of the courts has been observed, and through it - serious abuses of Human Rights. Richard Fine is probably the poster child for the abuse inherent in the current compromised integrity of electronic judicial records in at all levels involved in his case: 1) The Los Angeles Superior Court - published a false online "Case Summary", but is denying access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in the case management system of the court in the case. 2) The Sheriff of Los Angeles County - published false online arrest and booking records in its "Inmate Information Center", but is denying access to the true Los Angeles County Booking Record of Inmate Richard Fine. 3) The US District Court, Los Angeles - published a false online "PACER docket", but is denying access to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing - the authentication records) in the case, and the paper

Page 2/5

July 27, 2010

record, which is Richard Fine's commencing record - the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was allegedly adulterated. 4) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - published a false online "PACER dockets", but is denying access to the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity - the authentication records), and also to critical records filed by respondents in the appeal. 5) The US Supreme Court - published a false online "docket" noting denial by Justice Kennedy, which was not supported by the true records in the case, and denial by a conference of the US Supreme Court, which is yet to be verified. Access to true court dockets of the Supreme Court's case management system is yet to be permitted. Detailed documentation is available of correspondence with all agencies listed above, as part of failed attempts to access court records. Review of such conduct by the courts is particularly important in the context of the pending review of Human Rights in the United States as part of the first ever UPR (universal periodic review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations scheduled for November 2010. In case you are unable to undertake such representation, I would be grateful if you could recommend another suitable counsel. Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/ http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/ http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/ http://inproperinla.com/ http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/ http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine

Page 3/5

July 27, 2010

WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA? * "Innocent people remain in prison" * "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..." LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i] * "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii] * "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii] [i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/ [ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/ [iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339

At 06:55 PM 7/25/2010, you wrote:

Your message To: joseph zernik Cc: Smith, Darcy (USMS); Shell, Thomas(USMS) Subject: William Suter, Clerk of the US Supreme Court Asked to Certify, Provide Copies of Dockets in re: Richard Fine, Orly Taitz Sent: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:43:54 -0400 was read on Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:55:50 -0400 Final-Recipient: RFC822; minow@law.harvard.edu Disposition: automatic-action/MDN-sent-automatically; displayed X-MSExch-Correlation-Key: iOHEHYXnxUuKy1faAfqd1g== _________

William Suter Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States

William Suter, Clerk of the US Supreme Court Asked to Certify, Provide Copies of Dockets in re: Richard Fine, Orly Taitz Los Angeles, July 25 Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, filed request with William Suter, Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States to certify the online dockets of Applications pertaining to former US prosecutor Richard Fine and Attorney Orly Taitz, and provide copies of the dockets from the Courts own case management system. [1] Request pertained to Fine v Baca (09-A827) and Taitz v MacDonald (10-A56), applications for stay of executions, submitted to Justices Kennedy and Thomas, respectively.

Page 4/5

July 27, 2010

Both applications originated from penalties imposed on counsel who represented clients in causes that were not favored by government. In the former Richard Fine exposed, publicized, and rebuked the secret taking by all Los Angeles Superior Court judges of not permitted payments (bribes), which necessitated the signing by the California governor of retroactive immunities (pardons) for all such judges. Richard Fine was arrested on March 4, 2010, and has been held in solitary confinement ever since. However, no warrant was ever issued in his case, and no judgment/conviction/sentencing was ever entered, as required by California Code to make it effectual for any purpose. In the latter Orly Taitz filed complaint pertaining to native, natural born citizenship of President Barack Obama. Serious sanctions were consequently imposed on her. In both cases, denial of the applications were noted in online Court dockets and in letters by Counsel Danny Bickell. However, in both cases, review of the records [2] [3] raised serious concerns regarding contradictions, defects, and invalidity of both the online dockets and the respective letters by Danny Bickell. Moreover, the online public access system of Supreme Court dockets appeared as vague and ambiguous in both design and operation. Human Rights Alert filed in April 2010 report with the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 review by the United Nation of Human rights in the United States, which focused on the role of invalid online public access and case management systems in undermining integrity of the courts. Responses by the US State Department to the United Nations are due by August 2010, and the United Nations review session and report are scheduled for November 2010. LINKS [1] 10-07-25-Fine-v-Baca-09-A827-and-Taitz-v-MacDonald-10-A56-Request-for-Certification-ofDockets-by-William-Suter-Clerk-of-the-Supreme-Court-of-t http://www.scribd.com/doc/34835965/ [2] 10-07-25-Fine-v-Baca-09-A827-Supreme-Court-of-the-United-States-Records-in-Application-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/ [3] 10-07-25-Taitz-v-Macdonald-10-A56-Records-of-the-Supreme-Court-of-the-United-States-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/34835883/

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/ http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/ http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/ http://inproperinla.com/ http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/ http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?

Page 5/5

July 27, 2010

* "Innocent people remain in prison" * "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..." LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i] * "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii] * "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii] [i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/ [ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/ [iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful