You are on page 1of 4

No.

16-8625

In The
Supreme Court of the United States

Jeffrey T. Maehr,

Petitioner
v.

John Koskinen, Commissioner of Internal Revenue; et al,

Respondents
MOTION FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Petitioner comes before this court with this Motion for Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law, as stipulated in this courts rulings in Butz v. Economou and
Federal Maritime Commission V. South Carolina State Ports Authority (1)

Petitioner is puzzled that this court appears to not be following Federal Rules for
court actions and he prays for findings and laws which this court is functioning
under if not the Federal court rules. Petitioner cannot find a separate set of rules or
laws by Congress especially for this Supreme COUlt to follow, and requests
clarification of said rules that conflict with Federal Court rules.

The Motion for Default Judgment with affidavit previously sent to the court under

I "The parties are entitled to know the findings and conclusions on all of the issues of fact,

law, or discretion presented on the record." Citing Butz v. Economou 438 U'.S. 478, 98 S. Ct. 2894, 57
L. Ed. 2d 895, (1978). Federal Maritime Commission V South Carolina State Ports Authorityet al.
certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit No. 01-46. 2.535 Ll.S. 743, 122 S.
Ct. 1864, 152 L. Ed. 2d 962, (2002). Argued February 25, 2002--Decided May 28,2002. See also
FRCPA Rule 52(a) and United States v. Lovasco 431 U.S. 783 (06/09177), 97 S. Ct. 2044, 52 L. Ed. 2d
752, and Holt v. United States 218 U.S. 245 (10/31110), 54 L. Ed. 1021, 31 S. Ct.

FFCL - No. 16-8625 Page 1 of 2


Rule 55(2) has been COU1't stamped, but returned without being filed. Petitioner
contends that this rule is binding on this court where a party to the case fails to
rebut or respond to the clear charges.

The court denied Petition despite constitutional and statutory conflicts in the
record. This court appears to be contradicting its own stare decisis in denying
petition and evidence of record to be heard and rebutted. Petitioner requests the
laws and authority sources for this case to be denied and due process to be deprived
Petitioner.

Respectfully submitted,

Jeffrey T. Maehr
924 E. Stollsteimer Rd.,
Pagosa Springs, Colorado 81147
970-731-9724

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jeffrey T. Maehr, do declare that on May 25th, 2017, I served a copy of the Motion
for Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law on the person required to be served, by
depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mail
properly addressed to him as follows:

1. Solicitor General of the United States, Room 5616, Department of Justice, 950
Pennsylvania Ave., N. W., Washington, DC 20530-0001.

Dated May 25th, 2017

<=sl~ Y27i:--ae.-b~-
Jeffre~r

2 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Rule 55, Default; Default Judgment


(a) ENTERING A DEFAULT. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has
failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter
the party's default.

FFCL - No. 16-8625 Page 2 of 2


Jeff Sessions, AG
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

May 25th, 2017

RE: IRS/Court Collusion and Fraud - Case #16-8625

Dear Mr. Sessions,

I am copying you on my Motion for Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to the Supreme
Court. The court failed to file a default judgment against the Defendant IRS as required by Rule
55, and actually returned it to me.

Are you in support of this type of suppression of evidence and obstruction of justice for millions
of Americans? Is this how the draining of the swamp this administration spoke about is
occurring? Do we have two sets of laws now in America and are you defending lawlessness?

We are in serious trouble in this Republic if this is the administration's stance on the law and
constitution.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey T. Maehr,
924 E. Stollsteimer Rd.,
Pagosa Springs, Colorado 81147
970-731-9724

AG Jeff Sessions - Motion for Default Page 1 of 1


Congressman Trey Gowdy
104 South Main St.,
Greenville, SC 29601

May 25, 2017

RE: Case #16-8625

Dear Mr. Gowdy,

I am copying you on my Motion for Findings of Fact and Conclusions oflaw to the U.S.
Supreme Court. The court failed to file a default judgment against the Defendant IRS as required
by Rule 55, and actually returned it to me.

Are you in support of this type of suppression of evidence and obstruction of justice for millions
of Americans? Is this how the draining of the swamp this administration spoke about is
occurring? Do we have two sets of laws now in America and are you defending lawlessness?

We are in serious trouble in this Republic if this is the administration's stance on the law and
constitution.

Jeffrey T. Maehr,
924 E. Stoll steimer Rd.,
Pagosa Springs, Colorado 81147
970-731-9724

CC: President Trump


AG Jeff Sessions