You are on page 1of 5

ISSN (Online): 2349-7084


PP 178-182

Enhance the QoS capability of Hybrid Networks

using QoS-Oriented Distributed Routing Protocol
N.Asha Jyothi1, G.Ramya2, G.Mounika3, R.Sandeep Kumar4
Department of IT, G.Pullaiah College of Engineering and Technology. Kurnool
JNTU Anatapur, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract:-With the expanding interest for constant applications in the Wireless Senor Network (WSN), ongoing discriminating
occasions suspect a proficient quality-of-service (QoS) based Routing for information conveyance from the Network foundation.
Outlining such QoS based Routing convention to meet the unwavering quality and postponement certification of discriminating
occasions while protecting the vitality effectiveness is a testing assignment. Impressive exploration has been centred on creating
hearty vitality productive QoS based Routing conventions. In this paper, we tended to a remote crossover arrange that incorporates
a mobile wireless ad hoc network (MANET) and a wireless infrastructure network has been turned out to be a finer option for the
cutting edge remote Networks. By straight forwardly embracing asset reservation-based QoS Routing for MANETs, half breeds
Networks inherit invalid reservation and race condition issues in MANETs. Instructions to ensure the QoS in cross breed Networks
remains an open issue. In this paper, we propose QoS-Oriented Distributed routing protocol (QOD) to upgrade the QoS help
capacity of hybrid Networks.

Key Terms: quality-of-service (QoS), QoS-Oriented Distributed routing protocol (QOD), access points (APs), Mobile Ad-hoc
Networks (MANET)

1. INTRODUCTION of numerous scientists. Uniquely in contrast to base

remote Networks, where a settled Network access point is
Crossover remote Networks that incorporate MANETs in charge of intermediating each correspondence that
and base remote Networks have ended up being a finer happens in the Network, a Specially appointed Remote
Network structure for the cutting edge Networks. It can Networks hub ought to by one means or another alertly
act Base station and specially appointed as indicated by find to which hubs it has the capacity convey
the earth conditions. In the late years, the quick straightforwardly (its neighbors) and how to achieve hubs
innovative advances in micro electro-mechanical to which it can't impart specifically (hubs that are not in
frameworks, low power and exceptionally incorporated its transmission range). Hubs in such a Network ought to
computerized gadgets, little scale vitality supplies, minor chip in to permit correspondence to occur. They ought to
chip, and low power radio innovations have made low go about as hosts and switches in the meantime, so that at
power, ease, and multifunction al remote sensor gadgets. whatever point a hub is not ready to specifically achieve
These gadgets can gather the information by sensing the another, information courses through middle hubs until it
surrounding conditions in its region and send the sensed achieves the goal. Subsequently "Impromptu remote
information to the sink or base station along the Networks are making toward oneself, self sorting out and
reestablished courses through numerous remote bounces. administrating toward oneself Networks."
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (MANET) is a gathering of
portable nodes interconnected by wireless media. A few
conventions have been proposed to oversee various gets
to the imparted remote medium in MANETs, with the
IEEE 802.11 being the most actualized convention. There
is the remote blast i.e., the improvement of versatile
remote gadgets that is more effective and less expensive
in the meantime. The joining between these two
substances (new applications, basically constant sight and
sound applications and the remote world) are the center
IJCERT2014 178
ISSN (Online): 2349-7084


2014, PP 178-182
business reason. In Machine phrasing the definition for
Networks is comparative as a gathering of machines
intelligently associated for the offering of data or
administrations (like print administrations, multi-tasking,
and so on.). At first Machine Networks were begun as a
need for imparting records and printers yet later this has
moved from that specific employment of record and
printer offering to application imparting and business
rationale offering. Undertaking further Tanenbaum [1]
characterizes machine arranges as a framework for
correspondence between machines. These Networks may
be altered (cabled, perpetual) or impermanent. A Mobile
Ad-Hoc Network (MANET) is a framework less
accumulation of versatile hubs that can discretionarily
Fig 1. Hybrid Home network diagram change their geographic areas such that these Networks
have dynamic topologies which are made out of data
Wireless network is two different types: transmission compelled remote connections. MANET
hubs are furnished with remote transmitters and
1. Base station oriented wireless network (BS) collectors. At a given time relying upon the hubs positions
and their transmitter and recipient scope examples and
2. Ad hoc wireless network (Ad Hoc) transmission force levels, a remote network as an
irregular, multi jump chart or specially appointed
Both have some challenges
Network exists between the hubs. This specially
Capacity (Ad hoc),Handoff (BS),Bandwidth (Ad hoc ),BS appointed topology may change with time as the hubs
failure ( BS),Weak connection (Ad hoc) move or change their transmission and gathering
parameters [2].
HWN introduced for overcome those challenges A few
examples of its applications are:

a. A group of friends may establish a short duration

network for exchanging data.

b. A team of firefighters may deploy a network for

communicating to each other on an area that was
completely destroyed (where no infrastructure was left).

c. Sensors may be spread by plane over a forest or a farm

and they may spontaneously establish a network, so that
measurements may be obtained from every sensor.

d. A military unit may deploy such a network in the

battlefield, since they are not able to rely on the enemys Fig 2. Routing form Source to Destination in MANET
telecommunication infrastructure.
Routing is the demonstration of moving data from a
e. Space operations, undersea operations etc source to a goal in an internetwork. Amid this procedure,
no less than one moderate hub inside the internetwork is
2. BACKGROUND experienced. This idea is not new to software engineering
since Routing was utilized as a part of the systems in right
A Network is characterized as the gathering of on time 1970's. The Routing idea fundamentally includes
individuals or frameworks or associations who have a two exercises: firstly, deciding ideal Routing ways and
tendency to impart their data on the whole for their besides, exchanging the data gatherings (called bundles)

IJCERT2014 179
ISSN (Online): 2349-7084


2014, PP 178-182
through an internetwork. Routing is predominantly enhance the versatility of MANETs, while MANETs
arranged into consequently secure masterminding toward oneself
systems, broadening the scope of the framework systems.
1. Static Routing 2. Element Routing In a vehicle artful access organize (an example of half
breed systems), individuals in vehicles need to transfer or
Static Routing: alludes to the Routing procedure being
download features from remote Web servers through
expressed physically or statically, in the switch. Static
Access Points (APs) (i.e., base stations) spreading out in a
Routing keeps up a Routing table normally composed by
city. Since it is doubtful that the base stations cover the
a systems manager. The Routing table doesn't rely on
whole city to keep up sufficiently solid flag all around to
upon the condition of the system status, i.e., whether the
backing an application obliging high connection rates, the
end of the line is dynamic or not.
vehicles themselves can structure a MANET to broaden
Element Routing: alludes to the Routing procedure that the scope of the base stations, giving persistent system
is constantly learnt by an inner part or outside Routing associations.
convention. This Routing chiefly relies on upon the
condition of the system i.e., the Routing table is
influenced by the liveliness of the destination. The
essential test in building a MANET is preparing every
gadget to persistently keep up the data needed to
appropriately course movement. MANETs are a sort of
remote specially appointed system. There are two sorts of
Routing presents Responsive Routing and Proactive
Routing. These Routing conventions are important to
improve the QoS help ability of MANETs.

Fig 4.Classification of Network Architecture

Host-cum-relay stations
The dedicated relay stations do not originate data traffic
on their own and assist in forwarding for the sender.
Fig 3. MANET Routing Protocol Hierarchy
Single-Mode Networks
QoS is the ability to provide different priority to different
applications, users or data flows. A fundamental MHs operate only multi-hop mode.E.g. Multi hop
requirement of any QoS mechanism is a measurable Cellular Network (MCN)
performance metric. Typical QoS metrics include
available bandwidth, packet loss rate, estimated delay, Multi-Mode Networks
packet jitter, hop count and path reliability. To achieve the
global efficiency of QoS requirements end to end The mobile hosts act either in single-hop mode or in
bandwidth reservation is a challenging task. multi-hop mode depending on the architecture.

3. PRESENTED FRAMEWORK: E.g. Directional throughput-enhanced Wireless in Local

Loop (DWiLL)
Hybrid Architecture have been turned out to be a finer
system structure for the cutting edge remote systems and Dedicated relay stations
can help to handle the stringent end-to-end QoS
Dedicated relay stations are used for relaying data traffic
prerequisites of diverse applications. Cross breed systems
synergistically join base systems and MANETs to
Single-mode Networks
influence one another. Particularly, foundation systems

IJCERT2014 180
ISSN (Online): 2349-7084


2014, PP 178-182
E.g. Self-Organizing Packet Radio Ad hoc Network Distributed routing protocol (QOD). Usually, a hybrid
Overlay (SOPRANO) network has widespread base stations. The data
transmission in hybrid networks has two features. First,
Multi-mode Networks an AP can be a source or a destination to any mobile
node. Second, the number of transmission hops between a
E.g. integrated Cellular and Ad hoc Relay Network
mobile node and an AP is small. The first feature allows a
stream to have any cast transmission along multiple
transmission paths to its destination through base
Routing protocols
stations, and the second feature enables a source node to
Base-Assisted Ad Hoc Routing protocol (BAAR) connect to an AP through an intermediate node.

It was propose for the Multi Hop Cellular

Network (MCN) architecture

It efficiently makes use of the BS for Routing

Base-Driven Multi Hop Bridging Routing

protocol (BMBP)

It was proposed for the Multi Hop Wireless


AP compute the routing table is called bridging


It includes next hop node & hop count Fig 5.Network Architecture

SMCN Routing protocol (SMRP) Advantages of Proposed Network:

It was proposed for Single Interface Multi Hop The source hub plans the bundle streams to
cellular Network (SMCN) architecture neighbours focused around their lining
condition, channel condition, and portability,
It provide mechanisms for routing both control planning to diminish transmission time and build
and data packet through multiple hops system limit.

DWiLL Routing protocol (DRP) Taking full playing point of the two peculiarities,
QOD changes the bundle steering issue into an
It was proposed for the Directional Throughput element asset booking issue.
enhanced Wireless in Local Loop (DWiLL)
QoS is attained through the execution of strategies, for
Disadvantages of Presented framework: example,

Difficult to guarantee QoS in MANETs due to their 1. QoS ensured neighbor choice calculation to meet
unique features including user mobility, channel variance transmission delay necessity
errors, and limited bandwidth. Although these protocols
can increase the QoS of the MANETs to a certain extent, 2. A circulated parcel booking calculation lessen the
they suffer from invalid reservation and race condition further transmission delay
3. A portability based fragment resizing calculation
4. PROPOSED FRAMEWORK: that adaptively conforms section size.

In order to enhance the QoS support capability of hybrid 4. An activity repetitive end calculation to build
networks, in this paper, we propose a QoS-Oriented transmission throughput.

IJCERT2014 181
ISSN (Online): 2349-7084


2014, PP 178-182
5. A information excess based end calculation top [4] E. Biagioni and K. Bridges, The Applications of
dispose of the repetitive information to further Remote Sensor Technology to Assist the Recovery of Rare
enhance the transmission and Endangered Species, Intl J. High Performance
Computing Applications, special issue on distributed
5. CONCLUSION: sensor networks, April, 2003.
[5] H.T. Kung and D. Vlah, Efficient Location Tracking
In this paper, we tended to a wireless hybrid network that
Using Sensor Networks, Proc. IEEE Wireless Comm. and
coordinates a mobile wireless ad hoc network (MANET)
Networking Conf. (WCNC), March, 2003.
and a wireless infrastructure network has been turned out
[6] R. Brooks, P. Ramanathan, and A. Sayeed,
to be a finer option for the cutting edge remote systems.
Distributed Target Classification and Tracking in Sensor
By specifically embracing asset reservation-based QoS
Networks, Proc. IEEE, Vol.91, No.8, 2003, pp.1163-1171.
directing for MANETs, mixtures systems inherit invalid
[7] Jamal N. Al-Karaki, Ahmed E. Kamal, Routing
reservation and race condition issues in MANETs. . In this
techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey,IEEE
paper, we proposed different QoS-Oriented Distributed
Journal of Wireless Communications 11 (6) (2004) 6-28.
routing protocol (QOD) to improve the QoS help capacity
[8] Anahit Martirosyan, Azzedine Boukerche, Richard
of hybrid networks.
Werner, Nelem Pazzi, A taxonomy of clusterbased
routing protocols for wireless sensor networks, in: The
Proceedings of International Symposium on Parallel
[1] I.Akyildiz,W.Su, Y.Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks, ISPAN-2008,
Cayirci, A survey on sensor networks, IEEE Sydney, Australia, May, 7-9,2008, pp.247-253.
Communications Magazine, Volume: 40 Issue: 8, August, [9] Shah R, Rabaey J. Energy aware routing for low energy
2002, pp.102-114. ad hoc sensor networks. Proceedings of IEEE
[2] Tian He, Sudha Krishnamurthy, John A. Stankovic, WCNC02,Orlando, FL, March, 2002; 350-355.
Tarek Abdelzaher, Liqian Luo, Radu Stoleru,Ting Yan, [10] Ganesan D, Govindan R, Shenker S, Estrin D. Highly-
Lin Gu Energy-Efficient Surveillance System Using resilient, energy-efficient multipath routing in wireless
Wireless Sensor Networks MobiSYS04, June 6-9, 2004, sensor networks. Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc01, Long
Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Beach, CA, U.S.A., October,2001.
[3] A. Cerpa, J. Elson, D. Estrin, L. Girod, M. Hamilton, [11] Ye Ming Lu, Vincent W.S. Wong, An energy efficient
and J. Zhao, Habitat Monitoring: Application Drive for multipath routing protocol for wireless sensor networks,
Wireless Communications Technology, Proc. ACM International Journal of Communication System 20 (7)
SIGCOMM Workshop Data Comm.In Latin Am. and the (2007) 747-766.
Caribbean, April, 2001.

IJCERT2014 182