1 views

Uploaded by Yudi Haditiar

Jurnal ilmiah internasional bereputasi
Dari Acta Oceanologica Sinica
Terkait Kelautan

- Waves 1
- g7sciencestudentmodules-3rd4thqrtr-121107053926-phpapp01
- Van Der Meer_Wave Boundary Conditions and Over Topping in Complex Areas
- Water Waves Generated by Underwater Explosion
- EurOtop-2007 Wave Overtopping (en)
- oce421_lec1
- Ship tecnic Sharif university Lecture 2
- Wave Model 1
- Kind of Waves(Kranz and Lemar)
- tpack template online 1 1
- Wave Energy Presentation
- Waves
- Noaasarmanual Ch06 Pg171-188
- 6500-27812-1-PB
- Spe 146732
- CEM_II-1_WavesMech
- PDF-no23-05--Development of an Online Blast Furnace Burden Profile Measuring System
- Topikal Wave
- Speed and Sound Waves
- Essay Questions Phy

You are on page 1of 10

96105

DOI: 10.1007/s13131-016-0800-6

http://www.hyxb.org.cn

E-mail: hyxbe@263.net

near lateral boundaries with SWAN model

ZHANG Hongsheng1*, ZHAO Jiachen1, LI Penghui1, YUE Wenhan1, WANG Zhenxiang2

1 College of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China

2 Yangtze River Estuary Investigation Bureau of Hydrology and Water Resource, Yangtze River Water Resource

Received 13 February 2015; accepted 15 April 2015

Abstract

Since the wind wave model Simulating Waves Nearshore (SWAN) cannot effectively simulate the wave fields near

the lateral boundaries, the change characteristics and the distortion ranges of calculated wave factors including

wave heights, periods, directions, and lengths near the lateral boundaries of calculation domain are carefully

studied in the case of different water depths and wind speeds respectively. The calculation results show that the

effects of the variety of water depth and wind speed on the modeled different wave factors near the lateral

boundaries are different. In the case of a certain wind speed, the greater the water depth is, the greater the

distortion range is. In the case of a certain water depth, the distortion ranges defined by the relative errors of wave

heights, periods, and lengths are different from those defined by the absolute errors of the corresponding wave

factors. Moreover, the distortion ranges defined by the relative errors decrease with the increase of wind speed;

whereas the distortion ranges defined by the absolute errors change a little with the variety of wind speed. The

distortion range of wave direction decreases with the increase of wind speed. The calculated wave factors near the

lateral boundaries with the SWAN model in the actual physical areas, such as Lake Taihu and Lake Dianshan

considered in this study, are indeed distorted if the calculation domains are not enlarged on the basis of actual

physical areas. Therefore, when SWAN is employed to calculate the wind wave fields near the shorelines of sea or

inland lakes, the appropriate approaches must be adopted to reduce the calculation errors.

Key words: SWAN model, wave factor, change characteristic, distortion range, water depth, wind speed, lateral

boundary

Citation: Zhang Hongsheng, Zhao Jiachen, Li Penghui, Yue Wenhan, Wang Zhenxiang. 2016. The change characteristics of the calculated

wind wave fields near lateral boundaries with SWAN model. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 35(1): 96105, doi: 10.1007/s13131-016-0800-6

1 Introduction expected in the future (Ris et al., 1999). In fact, the SWAN model

After the pioneering work of Gelci et al. (1956), several ocean has been improved from different aspects by many researchers

wave models (e.g., The SWAMP Group, 1985; SWIM Group, 1985; (e.g., Holthuijsen et al., 2003; Hsu et al., 2005; van der West-

The WAMDI Group, 1988; Tolman, 1991) have been developed. huysen et al., 2007; Jia et al., 2010; Zijlema, 2010; Smith et al.,

These models are denoted as the first, second and third genera- 2011). Up till now, the latest version 41.01 has been released, and

tion wave models, depending on the level of parameterization of it is still in the process of improvement.

generation, dissipation and nonlinear wave-wave interactions In the SWAN model, it is presumed that all incoming wave

(Tolman, 1991). On the basis of WAM wave model (The WAMDI energy is absorbed by the lateral boundaries. This leads the cal-

Group, 1988), a third-generation spectral wave model (Simulat- culated wave heights near the lateral boundaries to be small. In

ing WAves Nearshore (SWAN)) has been developed to estimate fact, it is not certain for the wave energy near the lateral boundar-

wave conditions in small-scale, coastal regions by Booij et al. a- ies to be absorbed in practice. Therefore, the modeled wave

nd Ris et al. (1999). This model has been applied extensively in factors near the lateral boundaries are often distorted. The later-

coastal regions (e.g., Xu et al., 2000; Lin et al., 2002; Signell et al., al boundaries should be sufficiently far away from the area of in-

2005;Shi et al., 2006; Rogers et al., 2007; Rusu et al., 2011; Gorrell terest to avoid the calculation error propagating into the area of

et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2013). It is also used to calculate the interest (Booij et al., 1999). In order to obtain the right wind wave

wind wave fields in inland lakes (e.g., Bottema and van Vledder, fields, the calculation domain should be larger than the area of

2009; Moeini and Etemad-Shahidi, 2009; Zhang et al., 2015). interest. The focus of this paper is on studying the change charac-

The SWAN model assembles all relevant processes of genera- teristics of wind wave factors near the lateral boundaries and the

tion, dissipation, and nonlinear wave-wave interactions. This distortion ranges in which the wind wave factors cannot be prop-

model is a synthesis of state-of-the-art formulations, but many erly modeled, in the case of different water depths and wind

questions are still open, and significant improvements may be speeds respectively. The SWAN model is briefly described In Sec-

Foundation item: The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 51079082; the Natural Science Foundation of

Shanghai City under contract No. 14ZR1419600; the Research Innovation Projects of 2013 Shanghai Postgraduate under contract No.

20131129; the Top Discipline Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission.

*Corresponding author, E-mail: hszhang@shmtu.edu.cn

ZHANG Hongsheng et al. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 2016, Vol. 35, No. 1, P. 96105 97

tion 2. In Section 3, the basic parameters of SWAN are chosen, along the centerline of calculation domain. The wind direction

and the effect of spatial resolution on distortion range is dis- was assumed to match the positive x- axis direction, and it was 0.

cussed. The effects of water depth and wind speed on the change The wind speed at 10 m height above the still water level, U10,

characteristics and distortion ranges of different wave factors was chosen as 10.0 m/s. In the x- and y-directions, three different

near the lateral boundaries are studied in Sections 4 and 5, re- grid sizes were set as 200.0, 500.0, and 1 000.0 m, and the corres-

spectively. ponding mesh numbers were 450450, 180180, and 9090 re-

In Section 6, the SWAN model is employed to calculate the spectively. In Fig. 1, the calculated wave heights along the sec-

wind wave fields in Lake Taihu and Lake Dianshan. The two tion of x=89.5 km, which have been developed fully, are shown in

lakes, which are located in southeast China, belong to the Lake the case of different grid sizes. In this figure, H represents the sig-

Taihu watershed, and their lateral boundaries are land. When the nificant wave heights. It is indicated that the modeled wave

SWAN model is employed to simulate the wind wave fields of the heights using the 500 m grid size matched those obtained using

two lakes, the characteristics of the calculated results near the the 200 m grid size, but the modeled wave heights using the 1 000

lateral boundaries are discussed in detail. Finally, the conclu- m grid size differed near the lateral boundaries. In order to save

sions are given is Section 6. computation time, the grid sizes were chosen as 500 m500 m in

the following cases considered.

2 Description of SWAN

The SWAN model is a famous third-generation wave model,

which has been developed to compute random, short-crested

waves in coastal regions with shallow water and ambient cur-

rents. It is a spectral wave model based on the action density bal-

ance equation (Booij et al., 1999; Ris et al., 1999). The SWAN

model contains a number of physical processes which add or

withdraw wave energy to or from the wave field. In Cartesian co-

ordinates, the governing equation is expressed as (Booij et al.,

1999):

@N @ @ @ @ s Fig. 1. Spatial distribution of the calculated wave heights

+ cx N + cy N + c N + cN = ; (1)

@t @x @y @ @ along the section of x=89.5 km for different grid sizes.

where N(, , x, y, t) is the wave action density as a function of in- 4 Effects of water depth on distortion range

trinsic frequency , direction , horizontal coordinates x and y, The water depth of calculation domain varies. When the wa-

and time t; cx, cy, c and c represent propagation velocity of ac- ter depth increases, the fetch at which the wind wave is de-

tion density in geographical x and y, frequency and direction veloped fully also increases. For example, for the case of U10=20

space, respectively, and they are calculated on the basis of linear m/s, the wind wave is not developed fully when the fetch is short-

wave theory; S represents the source and sink terms, and er than 95.0 km if h is set as 10.0 m; whereas the wind wave has

S=Sin+Sni+Sds, where Sin represents the effects of wind wave gen- been developed fully when the fetch is 50.0 km if h is set as 6.0 m.

eration, Sni represents the nonlinear triad and quadruplet wave- Therefore, the length of calculation domain was assumed as

wave interactions, Sds represents energy dissipation, including 120.0 km in the x-direction when the effects of water depth on

white capping, bottom friction, and wave breaking, respectively. distortion range were studied. Correspondingly, the mesh num-

bers were set as 240180. The water depths, h, were set as 1.0 m,

3 Basic case 2.0 m, , 10.0 m, respectively. The wind speed and wind direc-

All of the calculated cases in the present paper were run with tion were set as 20 m/s and 0, respectively. The modeled results

version 40.85 (The SWAN Team, 2013). The relevant parameters are shown in Fig. 2 for the case of h=10.0 m. In the figure, the ho-

were set as: the directional resolution was 10, and the number of rizontal coordinate is the dimensionless fetch, and the vertical

meshes was 36; the lowest and highest discrete frequencies were coordinate is the dimensionless significant wave height. The di-

0.08 and 1.0 Hz, respectively. When the above parameters were mensionless fetch Xe and the dimensionless significant wave

set, the common convention was referred. In the present study, e are as follows:

height H

the BSBT (Backward Space, Backward Time) scheme was chosen.

The stationary mode was run when the wind fields are independ- gX e gH

ent of time, whereas the non-stationary mode was run when the Xe = 2 ; H = 2 ; (2)

U10 U10

wind fields are dependent of time.

The water areas in nearshore region were considered, and

they are not very large. For example, the third longest river in the

worldthe Yangtse River, is about 90.0 km at its broadest point,

and most of the water depth is less than 10.0 m. Moreover, the

areas of most of the calculation domains considered in the SWAN

model are less than 100 km100 km, and most of the water

depths are less than 10.0 m (e.g., Booij et al., 1999; Bottema and

Vledder, 2009; Ris et al., 1999; Rusu et al., 2011). Thus, in the

present study, the lengths of calculation domain were set as 90.0

km in the x- and y-directions respectively, and the water depth h

was set as 5.0 m. Both sides of the calculation domain in the y dir- Fig. 2. Spatial distribution of the calculated wave heights

ection were set as the lateral boundaries, and the x axis was set along the wind direction.

98 ZHANG Hongsheng et al. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 2016, Vol. 35, No. 1, P. 96105

where X is the fetch (m), g is the gravity acceleration (m/s2), H is as 1%, 2%, or 3%; or the absolute error at the point is greater than

significant wave height (m). a certain value, such as 0.02 m, 0.05 m, or 0.10 m. In this way, the

From Fig. 2, it is noticed that the wave heights are x-axis sym- relation of the distortion range of wave height to water depth is

metrical and that the outgoing boundaries do not influence the obtained, as shown in Fig. 4. In this figure, the vertical coordin-

calculated wave heights significantly. ate, D, represents the distance between the distorted point and

the lateral boundary. From Fig. 4, it can be found that the distor-

4.1 Wave heights tion range of wave height near the lateral boundary increases as

The distribution of modeled wave heights along the section of the water depth increases. The distortion range changes a little if

x=119.5 km for different water depths is shown in Fig. 3. In the the water depth is smaller than 4.0 m, and it increases obviously

present section, the modeled results in the middle of section of with the increase of water depth if the water depth is greater than

x=119.5 km are taken as the normal values. From Fig. 3, it can 4.0 m.

be seen that the modeled wave heights are different from each

other in the case of different water depths, that the wave heights 4.2 Wave directions

near the lateral boundaries are smaller than the normal values, The modeled wave direction at some point is considered to

and that the distortion ranges are also different from each other. be invalid if the absolute error at the point is greater than a cer-

In order to study the distortion range of wave heights near the tain value, such as 1, 2, or 3. In this way, the relation of the dis-

lateral boundaries quantitatively, the distortion ranges are tortion range of wave direction to water depth is obtained, as

defined by the absolute and relative errors respectively. The shown in Fig. 5. From this figure, it can be found that the distor-

modeled wave height at some point is considered to be invalid if tion range of wave direction obviously increases as the water

the relative error at the point is greater than a certain value, such depth increases.

The distribution of modeled wave periods along the section of

x=119.5 km for different water depths is shown in Fig. 6, where

the vertical coordinate, T, represents the wave period. It is indic-

ated that the modeled wave periods are different from each other

in the case of different water depths, that the wave periods near

the lateral boundaries are smaller than the normal values, and

that the wave periods at the lateral boundaries are greater than

the normal values. The modeled wave period at some point is

considered to be invalid if the relative error at the point is greater

than a certain value, such as 1%, 2%, or 3%; or the absolute error

at the point is greater than a certain value, such as 0.05 s, or 0.10 s.

In this way, the relation of the distortion range of wave period to

Fig. 3. Spatial distribution of the modeled wave heights in

the case of different water depths.

Fig. 5. Curve of the distortion range of wave direction in

the case of different water depths.

errors of wave heights in the case of different water depths

(a) and curve of the distortion range defined by the

absolute errors of wave heights in the case of different Fig. 6. Spatial distribution of the modeled wave periods in

water depths (b). the case of different water depths.

ZHANG Hongsheng et al. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 2016, Vol. 35, No. 1, P. 96105 99

water depth is obtained, as shown in Fig. 7. From this figure, it value, such as 1%,2%, or 3%; or the absolute error at the point is

can be seen that the distortion range of wave period near the lat- greater than a certain value, such as 0.5 m or 1.0 m. In this way,

eral boundary increases as the water depth increases. The differ- the relation of the distortion range of wave length to water depth

ences among the distortion ranges are small if the water depth is is obtained, as shown in Fig. 9. From Fig. 9, it can be seen that the

smaller than 3.0 m or 4.0 m, and the distortion range increases distortion range increases obviously with the increase of water

obviously with the increase of water depth if the water depth is depth if the water depth is between 4.0 m and 8.0 m, and that the

greater than 4.0 m. distortion range goes up and down,instead increases or de-

creases if the water depth is greater than 8.0 m.

4.4 Wave lengths As mentioned above, the modeled wind wave factors near the

The distribution of modeled wave lengths along the section of lateral boundaries are obviously distorted; and the distortion

x=119.5 km for different water depths is shown in Fig. 8, where ranges increase as the water depth increases.

the vertical coordinate, L, represents the wave length. It is indic-

ated that the modeled wave lengths are different from each other 5 Effects of wind speed on distortion range

in the case of different water depths, that the wave lengths near It is assumed that the water depth and wind direction are

the lateral boundaries are smaller than the normal values, and constant. They are set as 3 m and 0 respectively. The input wind

that the wave lengths at the lateral boundaries are greater than speeds, U10, are assumed as 7.0, 8.0, , 26.0 m/s, and the mean

the normal values. The distortion range increases as the water values of different Beaufort scales, including 6.7, 9.4, 12.3, 15.5,

22.3, and 26.5 m/s. The other parameters are set as those of Sec-

depth increases.

tion 3.

The modeled wave length at some point is considered to be

invalid if the relative error at the point is greater than a certain

5.1 Wave heights

In the present section, the modeled results in the middle of

section of x=89.5 km are taken as the normal values. The distri-

bution of modeled wave heights along the section of x=89.5 km in

the case of different wind speeds is shown in Fig. 10. From the fig-

ure, it can be seen that the modeled wave heights are different

from each other in the case of different wind speeds, that the

wave heights near the lateral boundaries are smaller than the

normal values, and that the distortion ranges are also different

from each other.

In order to study the distortion range of wave heights quantit-

atively, the distortion ranges are defined by the absolute and rel-

ative errors respectively. The criterions for distortion are the

same as Subsection 4.1. The relation of the distortion range of

wave height to water depth is obtained, as shown in Fig. 11.

From Fig. 11a, it is shown that the distortion range of wave

errors of wave periods in the case of different water depths

(a) and curve of the distortion range defined by the

absolute errors of wave periods in the case of different

water depths (b).

Fig. 9. Curve of the distortion range defined by the relative

errors of wave lengths in the case of different water depths

(a), and curve of the distortion range defined by the

Fig. 8. Spatial distribution of the calculated wave lengths absolute errors of wave lengths in the case of different

in the case of different water depths. water depths (b).

100 ZHANG Hongsheng et al. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 2016, Vol. 35, No. 1, P. 96105

height near the lateral boundary decreases with the increase of 5.3 Wave periods

wind speed if the wind speed is less than 20 m/s, and that the dis- The distribution of modeled wave periods along the section of

tortion range changes a little when the wind speed is greater than x=89.5 km in the case of different wind speeds is shown in Fig. 13.

20 m/s. From Fig. 11b, it is indicated that the distortion range of The criterions for distortion are the same as Subsection 4.3. From

wave height increases when the wind speed is between 10 m/s Fig. 13, it can be seen that the modeled wave periods are differ-

and 20 m/s, and that the distortion range remains basically un- ent from each other in the case of different wind speeds, that the

changed under the other circumstances. Compared Fig 11a with wave periods near the lateral boundaries are smaller than the

Fig. 11b, it is found that the variation trend of distortion range normal values, and that the wave periods at the lateral bound-

defined by the relative error is different from that defined by the aries are greater than the normal values. The relation of the dis-

absolute error. This is because the wave height increase as the tortion range of wave period to water depth is obtained, as shown

wind speed increases, leading the relative error to be smaller. in Fig. 14. Compared Fig. 14 a with Fig. 14 b, it is found that the

variation trend of distortion range defined by the relative error is

5.2 Wave directions different from that defined by the absolute error.

The criterions for distortion are the same as Subsection 4.2.

The relation of the distortion range of wave direction to water 5.4 Wave lengths

depth is obtained, as shown in Fig. 12. From this figure, it can be The distribution of modeled wave lengths along the section of

found that the distortion range of wave direction near the lateral x=89.5 km in the case of different wind speeds is shown in Fig. 15.

boundary decreases with the increase of wind speed, and that the It is indicated that the modeled wave lengths are different from

decreasing trend of distortion range is weakened a little when the each other in the case of different wind speeds, that the wave

wind speed is greater than 20 m/s. lengths near the lateral boundaries are smaller than the normal

values, and that the wave lengths at the lateral boundaries are

greater than the normal values.

The criterions for distortion are the same as Subsection 4.4.

The relation of the distortion range of wave length to water depth

is obtained, as shown in Fig. 16. From Fig. 16a, it can be seen that

the distortion range decreases with the increase of wind speed.

From Fig. 16b, it is indicated that the distortion range of wave

height increases when the wind speed is between 10 and 20 m/s,

and that the distortion range remains basically unchanged under

the other circumstances. From Figs 15 and 16b, it is shown that

the effect of wind speed on the distortion range is small. Com-

pared Fig. 16a with Fig. 16b, it is indicated that the variation trend

of distortion range defined by the relative error is different from

in the case of different wind speeds.

Fig. 12. Curve of the distortion range of wave direction in

the case of different wind speeds.

relative errors of wave heights in the case of different wind

speeds (a) and curve of the distortion range defined by the

absolute errors of wave heights in the case of different Fig. 13. Spatial distribution of the calculated wave periods

wind speeds (b). in the case of different wind speeds.

ZHANG Hongsheng et al. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 2016, Vol. 35, No. 1, P. 96105 101

Fig. 14. Curve of the distortion range defined by the

relative errors of wave lengths in the case of different wind

relative errors of wave periods in the case of different wind

speeds (a) and curve of the distortion range defined by the

speeds (a) and curve of the distortion range defined by the

absolute errors of wave lengths in the case of different

absolute errors of wave periods in the case of different

wind speeds (b).

wind speeds (b).

should be properly enlarged based on the actual physical areas,

when the wind wave fields are calculated with the SWAN model.

The bottom elevation (from the 1985 Chinese National Height

Datum) and measurement stations are shown in Fig. 17. As

shown in the figure, Lake Taihu is within a rectangle in which the

horizontal coordinates of the southern, northern, eastern, and

western boundaries are at y=3 422.00 km, y=3 491.00 km,

x=488.60 km, and x=555.65 km, respectively. The lake lies

between latitudes of 3055N and 3134N and longitudes of

11953E and 12040E (the Gauss-Kruger projection was em-

Fig. 15. Spatial distribution of the calculated wave lengths

ployed to transform the geographic coordinate system into the

in the case of different wind speeds.

Cartesian coordinate system). The wind fields and wave fields

were measured at three stations: Dapukou, Gonghu, and Ping-

that defined by the absolute error. taishan, hereafter named Stations T1, T2, and T3, respectively.

As mentioned above, the distortion ranges of wave factors, in- The horizontal rectangular coordinates of Stations T1, T2, and T3

cluding wave height, wave period and wave length, defined by are (493.45 km, 3 460.54 km), (537.64 km, 3 480.32 km), and

the relative errors are different from those defined by the abso- (510.06 km, 3 456.74 km), respectively. The measurement data

lute errors. For the cases considered, the distortion range defined from August 8 to September 2, 2007, were provided by the Hydro-

logy and Water Resources Supervision and Measurement Bureau

by the absolute error remains basically unchanged and increases

of the Taihu Basin Authority (Zhang et al., 2015). In this study,

slightly when the wind speed is between 10 and 20 m/s, whereas

the measurement data on August 24 are used. The wind fields

the distortion ranges defined by the relative errors decrease as

measured on that day are shown in Fig. 18. When the measured

the wind speed increases. This is because the wave factors in-

wind fields are used as the inputs, they are firstly converted into

crease with the increase of wind speed, which leads the relative

U10. After modeling tests, it is proper for Lake Taihu considered

error to be smaller. The distortion range of wave direction near that the grid sizes were chosen as 450 m in the westeast direc-

the lateral boundary decreases obviously with the increase of tion (x-direction) and 500 m in the southnorth direction (y-dir-

wind speed, and the decreasing trend is weakened a little when ection).

the wind speed is greater than 20 m/s. To define the calculation domain, three points, TA, TB, and

TC (shown in Fig. 17), were selected. The selected three points

6 Test cases were near the boundaries. The horizontal coordinates of points

The area of Lake Taihu is 2 427.8 km2, and it is large. In con- TA, TB, and TC were (520.71 km, 3 423.66 km), (515.83 km, 3

trast, Lake Dianshan has a small area of 63.0 km2. The two lakes 490.18 km), and (490.47 km, 3 456.91 km), respectively. The

are shallow. For Lake Taihu and Lake Dianshan, the long-term shortest distances between the shorelines and Point TA, TB, and

average water depths are 1.89 m and 2.0 m, respectively. Based TC were 263.98 m, 231.00 m, and 441.10 m, respectively. Three

102 ZHANG Hongsheng et al. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 2016, Vol. 35, No. 1, P. 96105

calculation domains were assumed, and the coordinates of their angle shown in Fig. 17. In the figure, the rectangle just covers the

boundaries are listed in Table 1. This table shows that the four outmost boundaries of Lake Taihu. In the eastern region, the wa-

boundaries for Case I correspond to the boundaries of the rect- ters are narrow and closed. Gales seldom impact the eastern

levee. Thus, the eastern boundary of the calculation domains was

not extended. The western, southern, and northern boundaries

for Cases II and III were correspondingly extended by five

meshes from the Cases I and II boundaries, respectively. Accord-

ingly, grids of 149138, 154148, and 159158 were adopted for

Cases I, II, and III, respectively. Using the average wind fields of

the three stations as inputs, the calculation results for Points TA,

TB, and TC, and Station T2, which is close to the shoreline, on

August 24 are shown in Fig. 19. From the figure, it can be seen

that the calculated wave heights at Point TA for Case I were dif-

stations in Lake Taihu.

Fig. 19. Comparisons of the calculated wave heights for

Fig. 18. Measured wind fields on August 24, 2007 (20:00 Lake Taihu on August 24, 2007, using different calculation

oclock on August 24 is defined as the zero hour). () for domains. Solid line: Case I; dashed line: Case II; triangles:

Station T1, (+) for Station T2, and () for Station T3. Case III.

Table 1. Horizontal coordinates of boundaries of the three calculation domains for Lake Taihu and Lake Dianshan, respectively

Lake Taihu Lake Dianshan

Southern Northern Western Eastern Southern Northern Western Eastern

Case

boundary boundary boundary boundary boundary boundary boundary boundary

y=3 422.00 y=3 491.00 x=488.60 x=555.65 y=3 439.40 y=3 452.50 x=299.96 x=310.96

y=3 419.5 y=3 493.50 x=486.35 x=555.65 y=3 438.90 y=3 453.00 x=299.46 x=311.46

y=3 417.00 y=3 496.00 x=484.10 x=555.65 y=3 438.40 y=3 453.00 x=299.46 x=311.46

Notes: In unit of km.

ZHANG Hongsheng et al. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 2016, Vol. 35, No. 1, P. 96105 103

ferent than those for Cases II and III, and the calculated wave the calculated wave heights at Points C and D for Case I were the

heights at Points TB and TC, and Station T2, were equal for all same as those for Case II. Therefore, the southern boundary of

three cases. The calculated wave heights at Stations T1 and T3 for Case III was extended five meshes from the Case II boundary,

all three cases were also compared and found to be equal. This is with the other Case III boundaries being the same as the corres-

because Stations T1 and T3 are in the center region of the lake.

ponding Case II boundaries. The calculated wave heights of four

Therefore, Case II was selected as the final calculation domain.

points for Case III are also shown in Fig. 22, and the data indicate

This was because Case II was smaller than Case III, and so the

computational time was not excessively wasted. that the calculation results for Case III were the same as those for

Case II. Therefore, Case II was selected as the final calculation

6.2 Lake Dianshan domain.

The bottom elevation chart and the three measurement sta-

tions are shown in Fig. 20. The Stations D1, D2, and D3 are loc-

ated at (301.98 km, 3 442.48 km), (304.14 km, 3 444.13 km), and

(306.39 km, 3 446.42 km), respectively. The wind fields measured

on July 18, 2009 are shown in Fig. 21.

Grid sizes were set to 100 m in the eastwest direction (x-dir-

ection) and in the northsouth direction (y-direction). To define

the calculation domain, four points, A, B, C, and D (shown in Fig.

20), were selected; they were all near the boundaries. The hori-

zontal coordinates of Points A, B, C, and D were (301.96 km, 3

440.00 km), (300.16 km, 3 441.20 km), (307.46 km, 3 452.30 km),

and (310.76 km, 3 446.80 km), respectively. The shortest dis-

tances between the shorelines and Points A, B, C, and D were 600

m, 200 m, 100 m, and 100 m, respectively. Three calculation do-

mains were assumed, and the coordinates of their boundaries are

listed in Table 1. This table shows that the four boundaries for

Case I correspond to the boundaries of the rectangle shown in

Fig. 20. In the figure, the rectangle just covers the outmost

boundaries of Lake Dianshan. The four boundaries of Case II

were correspondingly extended five meshes from the Case I

boundaries. Grids of 110131 and 120141 were adopted for

Cases I and II, respectively. The calculation results for Points A,

B, C, and D on July 18 are shown in Fig. 22. This figure shows that

the calculated wave heights at Point A for Case I differed signific-

antly from those for Case II; the calculated wave heights at Point Fig. 20. Sketch of the bottom elevation and measurement

B for Case I were somewhat different from those for Case II; and stations in Lake Dianshan.

Fig. 21. Measured wind fields in Lake Dianshan. Solid line: Station D1; dashed line: Station D2; dash-dotted line: Station D3.

104 ZHANG Hongsheng et al. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 2016, Vol. 35, No. 1, P. 96105

than 4.0 m or so, the lateral boundaries should be sufficiently far

away from the area of interest to avoid the calculation error

propagating into the area of interest.

When the water depth and wind direction are assumed to be

constant, generally, the distortion ranges of the calculated wave

factors decrease with the increase of wind speed. Moreover, for

the same wave factor, the variation trend of the distortion range

defined by the relative error is different from that defined by the

absolute error. When the absolute error is used to define distor-

tion range, the distortion ranges of the wave factors including

wave height, wave period, and wave length change a little with

the variation of wind speed; whereas the distortion range defined

by the relative error decreases obviously with the increase of

wind speed. This is because the calculated wave factors increase

as the wind speed increases, which leads the relative error to be

smaller. The distortion range of the modeled wave direction de-

creases as the wind speed increases.

Whether the water depth or the wind speed is assumed to be

constant, the modeled wave factors, including wave height, wave

period, and wave length near the lateral boundaries are less than

those along the x-axis; however, the modeled wave period and

wave length at the lateral boundaries are greater than those along

the x-axis. Therefore, when SWAN model is employed to calcu-

late the wind wave fields, the calculation domain should be prop-

erly enlarged on the basis of the area of interest, Such as Lake

Taihu and Lake Dianshan considered in this study, in order that

the whole wind wave fields in the area of interest can be ob-

tained accurately and the computation time is not wasted. The

present study should also be useful to the knowledge and im-

provement of SWAN model.

References

Booij N, Ris R C, Holthuijsen L H. 1999. A third-generation wave

model for coastal regions: 1. model description and validation.

Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(C4): 76497666

Bottema M, van Vledder G P. 2009. A ten-year data set for fetch-and

Fig. 22. Comparisons of the calculated wave heights for depth-limited wave growth. Coastal Engineering, 56(6):

Lake Dianshan on July 18, 2009, using different calculation 703725

Gelci R, Cazal H, Vassal J. 1956. Utilization des diagrammes de

domains. Solid line: Case I; dashed line: Case II; triangles:

propagation la prvision nergltique de la houle. Info Bull

Case III.

(in French), 8(4): 160179

Gorrell L, Raubenheimer B, Elgar S, et al. 2011. SWAN predictions of

waves observed in shallow water onshore of complex bathy-

7 Conclusions

metry. Coastal Engineering, 58(6): 510516

The change characteristics of wind wave factors near the lat- Holthuijsen L H, Herman A, Booij N. 2003. Phase-decoupled refrac-

eral boundaries of calculation domain, and the distortion ranges tiondiffraction for spectral wave models. Coastal Engineering,

in which the wind wave factors cannot be properly modeled are 49(4): 291305

studied in detail in the present paper when SWAN model is em- Hsu T W, Ou S H, Liau J M. 2005. Hindcasting nearshore wind waves

ployed to model the wind wave fields. The cases with different using a FEM code for SWAN. Coastal Engineering, 52(2):

water depths or different wind speeds are considered, the follow- 177195

ing summaries can be obtained. Jia Xiao, Pan Junning, Niclasen B. 2010. Improvement and validation

of wind energy input in SWAN model. Journal of Hohai Uni-

When the wind speed and wind direction are assumed to be

versity (Natural Sciences) (in Chinese), 38(5): 585591

constant, the distortion ranges of the calculated wave factors in- Lin Weiqi, Sanford L P, Suttles S E. 2002. Wave measurement and

crease with the increase of water depth. The distortion range of modeling in Chesapeake Bay. Continental Shelf Research,

wave height is small if the water depth is less than 4.0 m or so; 22(1819): 26732686

whereas it increases obviously if the water depth is greater than Moeini M H, Etemad-Shahidi A. 2009. Wave parameter hindcasting

4.0 m or so. The distortion range of wave direction increases ob- in a lake using the SWAN model. Scientia Iranica, Transaction

viously as the water depth increases. The variation trend of the A: Civil Engineering, 16(2): 156164

Ris R C, Holthuijsen L, Booij N. 1999. A third-generation wave model

distortion range of wave length with water depth is similar to that

for coastal regions, 2. Verification. Journal of Geophysical Re-

of wave period, namely, the distortion range changes a little if the search, 104(C4): 76677681

water depth is less than 4.0 m or so; it increases rapidly if the wa- Rogers W E, Kaihatu J M, Hsu L, et al. 2007. Forecasting and hindcast-

ter depth is between 4.0 m and 8.0 m; it goes up and down,in- ing waves with the SWAN model in the Southern California

stead increases or decreases if the water depth is greater than 8.0 Bight. Coastal Engineering, 54(1): 115

ZHANG Hongsheng et al. Acta Oceanol. Sin., 2016, Vol. 35, No. 1, P. 96105 105

Rusu E, Goncalves M, Soares C G. 2011. Evaluation of the wave trans- wave prediction model. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 18:

formation in an open bay with two spectral models. Ocean En- 17751810

gineering, 38(16): 17631781 Tolman H L. 1991. A third-generation model for wind waves on

Shi J Z, Luther Mark E, Meyers S. 2006. Modelling of wind wave-in- slowly varying, unsteady, and inhomogeneous depths and cur-

duced bottom processes during the slack water periods in rents. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 21(6): 782797

Tampa Bay, Florida. International Journal for Numerical Meth- van der Westhuysen A J, Zijlema M, Battjes J A. 2007. Nonlinear satur-

ods in Fluids, 52(11): 12771292 ation-based whitecapping dissipation in SWAN for deep and

Signell R P, Carniel S, Cavaleri L, et al. 2005. Assessment of wind shallow water. Coastal Engineering, 54(2): 151170

quality for oceanographic modelling in semi-enclosed basins. Xu Fumin, Zhang Changkuan, Mao Lihua, et al. 2000. Application of a

Journal of Marine Systems, 53 (4): 217233 numerical model for shallow water waves. Journal of Hydro-

Smith G A, Babanin A V, Riedel P, et al. 2011. Introduction of a new dynamics (in Chinese), 15(4): 429434

friction routine into the SWAN model that evaluates roughness Zhang Hongsheng, Gu Junbo, Wang Hailong, et al. 2013. Simulating

due to bedform and sediment size changes. Coastal Engineer- wind wave field near the Pearl River Estuary with SWAN nested

ing, 58(4): 317326 in WAVEWATCH. Journal of Tropical Oceanography (in

The SWAMP Group. 1985. Ocean Wave Modeling. New York: Plenum Chinese), 32(1): 817

The SWAN Team. 2013. SWAN Technical Documentation. The Neth- Zhang Hongsheng, Zhou Enxian, Dai Su, et al. 2016. Comparison of

erlands: Delft University of Technology the calculated and measured wave heights in Inland Lakes.

The SWIM Group. 1985. A shallow water intercomparison of three Journal of Coastal Research, 32(3) (Being Printed)

numerical wave prediction models (Swim). Quarterly Journal of Zijlema M. 2010. Computation of wind-wave spectra in coastal wa-

the Royal Meteorological Society, 111(470): 10871112 ters with SWAN on unstructured grids. Coastal Engineering,

The WAMDI Group. 1988. The WAM model-A third generation ocean 57(3): 267277

- Waves 1Uploaded bysweehian844
- g7sciencestudentmodules-3rd4thqrtr-121107053926-phpapp01Uploaded byZigmund Laqui
- Van Der Meer_Wave Boundary Conditions and Over Topping in Complex AreasUploaded byapi-3709579
- Water Waves Generated by Underwater ExplosionUploaded bymlupoae2003
- EurOtop-2007 Wave Overtopping (en)Uploaded byCatalin_Fusa
- oce421_lec1Uploaded byUdhaya Sankar
- Ship tecnic Sharif university Lecture 2Uploaded byjan_warberg
- Wave Model 1Uploaded bySurya Prakash Kabi
- Kind of Waves(Kranz and Lemar)Uploaded byJorge Palgan
- tpack template online 1 1Uploaded byapi-402611432
- Wave Energy PresentationUploaded by123harsh123
- WavesUploaded byElendu Emmanuel Chigozie
- Noaasarmanual Ch06 Pg171-188Uploaded byGonzalo Aguilar L
- 6500-27812-1-PBUploaded byHaryo Armono
- Spe 146732Uploaded byRahul Saraf
- CEM_II-1_WavesMechUploaded byEu Gene
- PDF-no23-05--Development of an Online Blast Furnace Burden Profile Measuring SystemUploaded byAnonymous I6vOfKY2
- Topikal WaveUploaded byjesunathan44@yahoo.com
- Speed and Sound WavesUploaded byettevyvi
- Essay Questions PhyUploaded byZainun Miah
- punjab-boards-10th-class-physics-book-english-medium-6368072829234769390.pdfUploaded bySaqib Saleem
- Free BoardUploaded bySouvik Das
- Wave PropagationUploaded byderpyuniverse
- WavesUploaded byVenu Gopal
- G. J. Sharpe and J. J. Quirk- Nonlinear cellular dynamics of the idealized detonation model: regular cellsUploaded byNikeShoxxx
- wave workUploaded bytownsenr94
- Abstract Does Not Have Unit in OrderUploaded byJulius_Ian_D_L_2866
- 1027-ISOPE-95Uploaded byLenin Valerio
- c06 Calm BuoyUploaded byhashmi72
- MT-4 P1Uploaded byPujan

- Steve JobsUploaded byNoraesyah Kamaruddin
- zebexz3100Uploaded byhotchaiwat
- Dummy Bit Rate Matching for UMTS LTE.pdfUploaded byCésarAntonioPérezCoronel
- 2 Carantes vs CAUploaded byDever Gerona
- phytoremediationUploaded bySanam Abbasi
- 3. Davao New Town Development Corporation vs. COSLAP, G.R. No. 141523, June 8, 2005Uploaded byLou Ann Gulbin
- performance utopiaUploaded byapi-299274012
- Sprint Enterprise Messenger Android User Guide 1 0 4Uploaded byRy Gee
- TTMTAV230212Uploaded byankitgor
- First Time BowUploaded byhuurling
- MBA 111-1Uploaded byniraj
- Manual AP90Uploaded byAn Car
- Anselme O. Connor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 770 F.2d 17, 2d Cir. (1985)Uploaded byScribd Government Docs
- cpfrUploaded byahmed_iag
- Load Test Procedure for lifting tacklesUploaded byBoby Thomas
- MrpUploaded byPaul Tello Rojas
- O&S Instructions_Reducing ValvesUploaded byTifano Khristiyanto
- About Virtualization F5Uploaded byJo Yangkyu
- Total Report With No AppendixUploaded byHuma Baig
- 24kV Distribution TransformerUploaded bymrhom
- Statistical Wireless Channel ModelUploaded byanc62
- correction of civil entries.rtfUploaded byLiDdy Cebrero Belen
- Excerpt From "They Can't Kill Us All" By Wesley LoweryUploaded byOnPointRadio
- The Impact of Organizational Culture on Company Performance 07.05.2016.docxUploaded byshadynader
- S-250G TM 10-5411-205-13Uploaded bycattyalpha123
- FDA_Guidance_Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling ClaimsUploaded byAwais Khan
- Kestudies.orgUploaded byBanciu Andrada
- Unit_01 and 02Uploaded byimi
- Theory Practice Cryptography Network Security all 13Uploaded byAstrohanuman
- How Grounding is Different Than EarthingsUploaded byAli Khatter