165 views

Original Title: Drop League

Uploaded by Wally Wissner

- app-prob2018-2
- Random Walk
- Probability and Statistics UIUC Luthuli
- Brownian Sheet and Capacity
- Lie Bracket
- problems in probability mit
- Intelligent Reservoir Characterization
- ICMCPaper
- nagendra-cvnet1
- A Revealing Introduction to HMM
- Decision Theory
- Gesture Recognition Using Accelerometer
- 9 - Ijbmr - Direction of Trade Analysis of Indian Grapes
- Signature Recognition and Verification: The Most Acceptable Biometrics for Security
- 1 Integration2010 Proceedings
- mit6 041f10 l17
- MA1014 Lesson Plan 01
- Assignment 1 Computing Applications for Engineers
- 1-s2.0-S095183201000147X-main.pdf
- IJPEGenTwoMach09

You are on page 1of 6

ON MTGO?

1. Introduction

If youre an average Magic player playing constructed leagues on MTGO for

pure entertainment, trying to bleed away money as slowly as possible, the answer

to this question is a pretty easy you shouldnt. However, if youre a grinder

trying to make a profit by playing constructed events, the answer to this question

isnt obvious. The answer depends on your winrate with the deck youre playing,

the prize distribution of the event, and the market price of those prizes. How does

the answer depend on those factors? That is the question we aim to answer.

Your expected value (EV) for joining a league depends on the following variables:

the price of entry to the event

your winrate with the deck you are playing w

the number of play points awarded p (almost always worth approximately

$0.10)

the number of treasure chests awarded

the value of a treasure chest on the secondary market t (generally worth

approximately $2-3)

the number of qualifier points (QPs) awarded

the utility the player gets from collecting qualifier points q

This final one has widely different value to different players, and the specific

value doesnt change the analysis we have to perform here, so for our purposes,

well treat qualifier points as though they have no monetary value.

Note: A small simplifying assumption we will make is that your winrate is

the same in each round of a league. Though this is unlikely true (you probably

are more favored to win versus your round one 1-2 opponent than your round

five 4-0 opponent) getting these numbers for your own performance is going to be

extremely difficult with any statistical significance. Furthermore, its pretty easy

to follow the unsimplified version of this assumption through in our analysis, so

we will leave that problem as an exercise for the curious reader.

2. Expected Values

As of the writing of this article, the cost to enter a competitive constructed league

on MTGO is 12 tickets or 120 play points (either entry price is approximately

1

2 WALLY WISSNER (aka MACHINESCHOOLING)

valued at $12). The prize payouts for the leagues depend only on your win-loss

record during the league, and currently come in the form of a combination of play

points, treasure chests, and qualifier points. If p is the number of play points you

receive, t is the number of treasure chests you receive, and q is the number of

qualifier points you receive, then the current value of the prize payouts can be

expressed as

V4-1 = 180p + 8t + 1q

V3-2 = 120p + 1t

where V32 , for example, is the value of the prize payout if your final record is 3-2.

All tournament results not listed above do not result in any prize payouts.

The EV per league if you never drop before you finish is equal to the sum of the

payouts times the probability of you receiving that payout, i.e. the probability of

you having the corresponding win-loss record. These probabilities follow a binomial

distribution. This EV can be expressed as

5 5 5 4 5 3

EVND = w V5-0 + w (1 w)V4-1 + w (1 w)2 V3-2 12

5 4 3

where ab is the binomial coefficient. In this case, 55 = 1, 54 = 5, and 53 = 10.

For players trying to keep losses to a minimum, EV per league is what they

want to maximize. However, if youre trying to grind out a profit on MTGO,

EV per league is not actually what youre trying to maximize. What you want

to maximize is your EV per match! Remember, time is money, and time spent

playing matches that have a very small contribution to your EV is time better

spent playing higher EV matches.

Your EV per match (ev) if you never drop from a league is:

1

evND = EVND

5

Nice and simple!

This was a good warmup, but unfortunately it doesnt yield very practical in-

formation. Grinders dont play out all five matches if theyre already out of the

running for prizes. Once their win-loss record is X-3, theyll drop from the league.

They want to move on to the next league so they can have another shot at the

money. This means there wont always be five matches played in a league, and the

simple divide-by-five calculation isnt going to cut it. However, since you have to

win three matches in a row to prize out if you start off 0-2, theres also a large risk

of wasting a large amount of time chasing after a small or nonexistent prize by

not dropping from the league at this point. We will consider the EV per match of

WHEN SHOULD YOU 0-2 DROP A COMPETITIVE LEAGUE ON MTGO? 3

this early drop 0-2 strategy as well as the more common play-until-youre-out-

of-the-running-for-prizes X-3 strategy. From here on out, were going to have to

use some real math. I hope you remember your Linear Algebra.

3. Model

To take into account the varying length leagues in our EV per match calculation,

we will use a model called a Markov chain. In this case, the states in the Markov

chain correspond to the possible win-loss records a player can have within a league.

The EV of the league will be calculated based on how often you end up in one of

the states corresponding to finishing a league (5-0, 4-1, 3-2, 2-3, 1-3, 0-3 if youre

not 0-2 dropping, and 0-2 if you are). Each time you enter the 0-1 or 1-0 state, it

means you entered a new league, so you had to pay the league entry fee again.

ev = V5 V3 V1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 .

where is the probabilities that you have a given record at a random point in

time. These are called the steady-state probabilities.

= ( 5-0 4-1 3-2 2-3 4-0 3-1 2-2 1-3 3-0 2-1 1-2 0-3 2-0 1-1 0-2 1-0 0-1 )

Now that we know how to calculate the EV per match given the steady-state

probabilities, we just need to find those values. To do this, we look to the limiting

behavior of the Markov process.

The limiting behavior of a Markov process is based on the processs transition

matrix, which is just a matrix containing the transition probabilities between the

states. For us, the transition probabilities are just the probabilities that the player

wins/loses their match and how that win/loss changes their win-loss record. For

example, the probability state 3-1 goes to state 4-1 is w and the probability it goes

to state 3-2 is 1 w.

The X-3 drop transition matrix TX-3 looks like this:

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w

1w

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w

w 1w

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w

TX-3 = 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0

while the 0-2 drop transition matrix T0-2 looks like this:

4 WALLY WISSNER (aka MACHINESCHOOLING)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w

1w

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w

w 1w

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w

T0-2 = 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 1w 0 0

The only difference between the two matrices, corresponding to the decision

whether or not to drop at state 0-2, is highlighted in red.

To derive the steady-state probabilities from the transition matrix, we have to

find the ratios between the matrixs left eigenvalues. Unfortunately, due to the

size of this matrix, finding a simple expression for its eigenvalues isnt possible.

Instead, we will have to use numerical methods. One of the easiest methods

is the power iteration method, which simply involves multiplying the matrix by

itself repeatedly until it doesnt change between iterations anymore. Once it stops

changing, every row of the product matrix will be an identical weighted list of the

matrixs eigenvalues.

4. Analysis

Now that we know how to calculate the EV per match, lets take a look and see

how each strategy compares.

WHEN SHOULD YOU 0-2 DROP A COMPETITIVE LEAGUE ON MTGO? 5

If the player is losing money on average, then playing as many rounds as possible

leaks money the slowest, as one would expect. However, if the player is a grinder

making money on average, it turns out that all three strategies are pretty close in

performance. To see whether X-3 drop or 0-2 drop is better, well have to take a

closer look at the difference in their performance.

It turns out that the player has slightly higher EV per match if they 0-2 drop

rather than go for the hope to turn an 0-2 into a 3-0 plan as long as their winrate

is sufficiently high. How high that winrate has to be depends on the values of

treasure chests and how the player values qualifier points.

How does the price of treasure chests affect how high the players winrate must

be to be better off 0-2 dropping?

6 WALLY WISSNER (aka MACHINESCHOOLING)

It turns out that when treasure chests are worth below $0.96 there is no winrate

sufficient such that is is beneficial to 0-2 drop. Otherwise, the necessary winrate

steadily declines as the value of treasure chests go up. If the players winrate is

at least 50% then it is profitable to 0-2 drop as long as the value of a treasure

chest is at least $5.05. If the players winrate is at least 67% then it is profitable

to 0-2 drop as long as the value of a treasure chest is at least $1.80. A pretty good

approximation for this relation (shown in red on the graph) is given by:

1.0332 1.7217 0.7786 0.5663

wmin = 3 + + 1 + 0.2054

t2 t2 t t2

Since treasure chests are usually in the $2-3 range, we will show a zoomed-in

look at the previous graph.

5. Conclusion

So when should you 0-2 drop a competitive constructed league on MTGO? You

should only 0-2 drop if you are a grinder making a profit from your leagues. If you

are, it still depends somewhat closely upon the value of treasure chests. For the $2-

3 range in value treasure chests have had over the last year, the minimum winrate

to justify 0-2 dropping ranges from 58% to 65%. If you are a very successful grinder,

0-2 dropping will be worth your while most of the time. For most, though, paying

close attention to market prices will have to inform your decision on whether to

0-2 drop or not.

- app-prob2018-2Uploaded byclaudio
- Random WalkUploaded byQiang Tang
- Probability and Statistics UIUC LuthuliUploaded byNitin Deshpande
- Brownian Sheet and CapacityUploaded bytuanminh
- Lie BracketUploaded byMogaime Buendia
- problems in probability mitUploaded byManoj Nanduri
- Intelligent Reservoir CharacterizationUploaded byVishal Das
- ICMCPaperUploaded byRonaldo Rino
- nagendra-cvnet1Uploaded bykvishnupriya
- A Revealing Introduction to HMMUploaded bylou_ferrigno00
- Decision TheoryUploaded bySonic Master
- Gesture Recognition Using AccelerometerUploaded byJithin Raj
- 9 - Ijbmr - Direction of Trade Analysis of Indian GrapesUploaded byTJPRC Publications
- Signature Recognition and Verification: The Most Acceptable Biometrics for SecurityUploaded byAnonymous vQrJlEN
- 1 Integration2010 ProceedingsUploaded byKhirulnizam Abd Rahman
- mit6 041f10 l17Uploaded byapi-246008426
- MA1014 Lesson Plan 01Uploaded byPrashanth Vaidya
- Assignment 1 Computing Applications for EngineersUploaded byAizatZack
- 1-s2.0-S095183201000147X-main.pdfUploaded bySai Ram
- IJPEGenTwoMach09Uploaded bymarcancao
- Probability via ExpectationUploaded byMichael Yu
- jMarkovManual.pdfUploaded bywilli1256
- Attenuation PredictionUploaded byRajeev Lohani
- lec36.pdfUploaded byVanitha Shah
- 120297Uploaded byijsret
- Hidden Markov Model [Viterbi Algorithm].pdfUploaded byQasim Khan
- mdUploaded byAlvaro Vilca
- PNAS-2012-Press-10409-13Uploaded byMarius Lacatus
- dm07_013Meila3Uploaded bynagator
- 2004 Jun MS Edexcel Mechanics-1 6677Uploaded byKaushal

- Notrel Networks Case StudyUploaded byGiora Ketter
- partnership detailed processesUploaded byStephanie Johnson
- Questionnaire for Business ResearchUploaded byManidhara Rao Manne
- Yellow Fats Sector InsUploaded byrohit22221
- INSTALLMENT SALES & LONG-TERM CONS.docxUploaded bySirr Jey
- SAP - terp 10Uploaded bypearl042008
- CA CPT Micro Economics PPT Theory of CostUploaded byShobi Dionela
- FI CO OKENN Display Standard HeirarchyUploaded byAsh
- 3 Philippine Solar RooftopsUploaded byEuniceFetalver
- EU: Airplanes And Other Aircraft - Market Report. Analysis And Forecast To 2020Uploaded byIndexBox Marketing
- Pak RaldiUploaded byralkoest
- Recitation 2Uploaded byTheodore Teddy J
- Povestiri Spaniole Pentru IncepatoriUploaded byDelia Toma
- We Love - Haas, SwitzerlandUploaded byJuliet Benning
- PPSAS 12-Inventories Oct- 18 2013Uploaded byIngrid Abella
- RedBus Ticket 73377684Uploaded byApurv Singh
- Syllabus ITOUploaded byJyoti Sankar Bairagi
- Case StudyUploaded byhaseeb
- The JonesesUploaded byCoronel ozner
- SandeepSharma[3_2]Uploaded bys_abrol
- TiffanyUploaded byRamanujam Raghavan
- EIB Economics Working Paper 2015 01 EnUploaded byStelios Karagiannis
- BS Quick GuideUploaded byتجو يز قاسم على
- Management AccountingUploaded byAljohn Sebuc
- BudgetUploaded byRamanaReddy Mula
- History of FinlandUploaded byVeronicaGelfgren
- ECMB02_TT1_2012WUploaded byexamkiller
- 356840021-ABC-FINANCIAL-ANALYSIS-With-Proposed-Investment.docxUploaded bySaurabh Singh
- Cusomer Service issuesUploaded byShyam
- poverty inequality.pdfUploaded byfkkfox