You are on page 1of 5




JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Case No. 1:17 cv 00280







Comes Now Plaintiff incorporates in this Motion all documents filed by Plaintiff in this case from
start. Plaintiff asks for Sanctions in the amount of $58,000.00 from Defendants for Perjury,
obstruction of Justice. Conspiracy. Ignoring of Professional Code of Ethics to report any and all
criminal activity of a Judge or lawyer in the attempt to conspire with Judges and this court to have
subpoenas denied due to misleading Plaintiff in the movement of Motion to Dismiss from May 26,
2017 to June 2, 2017.

Plaintiff whom the Judiciary since September of 2007 has been playing these games, appears to
created prosecutorial and judicial misconduct as well as misconduct by the Attorney Generals Office
of the State of Virginia, the Judge and or Magistrate Judge of this case, in the form of denials of due
process, to further COVER UP the malicious prosecution, financial conflict and false imprisonment by
Judge Clark with the conspiracy to deny rights, conspiracy to deny equal protection of the laws, under
the color of law of the Commonwealths of Virginia and the United States of America, pursuant to 42
U.S.C. Section 1983 and Title 18 U.S.C. Section 242 Desperation of Rights Under Color of Law. The
Plaintiff, moves the court for entry of judgment in her favor against the Defendants to send a strong
message to the Attorney General and his staff that Due Process is a guarantee right of every Citizen in
the United States of America.

Statement of Facts

1. That on or around April 14, 2017 in a conversation with Defendants attorney Plaintiff offered
to drop suit if Defendant Vacated all Orders since January of 2012.
2. That on May 2, 2017 Plaintiff request Extension of time till a decision on Subpoenas, by a
Judge with Jurisdiction. At which time Defendant asked for Plaintiff to move the hearing date
to June 2, 2016. Prompting Plaintiff to re-submit subpoenas. Exhibit 1
3. Email on May 6th of re-submit of subpoenas on May 10, 2017 states that Defendant would
file the change of day as of May 15, 2017 no Notice has been filed to change date. Exhibit 2
4. Email May 12, 2017 Plaintiff has been given new warning of threat on her life Exhibit 3
5. Litigation is not a game. Janices life and her girls have been ruined by the knowledgeable
intent of the Judiciary the Government and the Elected Officials to destroy Janice and her
girls, while empowering a corrupt Divorce lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman. .
No different than they do to others who do not have the strength emotionally to STAND UP
and SPEAK OUT about the corruption and the enterprise that runs throughout this country.
6. Defendants attorney acknowledged in the conversation on or around April 14, 2017 several
times her responsibility if any et al when there is criminal or conflict of the Judicial Canons
it was her job to report such activity. The Professional Code of Ethics (8.3) and the Judicial
Canons both require such reporting over and above the right to defend such behavior. If an
attorney or Judge does not report he then becomes a party to the knowledgeable criminal
activity. In this unique situation the appearance is the Judiciary of this court is colluding with
the Attorney Generals office to prevent the time to serve subpoenas.

7. Plaintiff is fighting a David and Goliath type fight with the Judiciary, the Government and
Elected Officials goal to see her DEAD.

8. Judge Ellis in his court room to crack heads et al has what appears to be a standard speech:

You just like me and everyone else are required to follow the law.

You have the ability to write your own story, and change it

You can make mistakes, but you must tell the truth and own up to those mistakes

There are consequence for all actions

9. Judges, Lawyers, Government Employees and Elected Officials have started to believe and act
as if they are above the law. That they do not have to follow the law, that they make the law
and protect those in their private media, Judicial, Elected Officials and Government club.

10. The Perfect examples are:

Chief Judge Richard Roberts rapes a 16 year old victim not held accountable, he is
retired early full benefits and We the People pay for that and he is never held

Chief Judge Cynthia Kinser retired early all benefits for letting Michael Gardner out of
jail. Found quilty of molesting young girls. The Virginia Appeals Court denies, but the
Supreme Court to a Democrat Fund Raiser lets him out of jail, he turns around and hires
a Hit Man to kill the Girls. More Exhibit 5.

11. Further Plaintiff is allowed witnesss unless of course through collusion of the Judges and
Defendant / Defendants attorney the decision has already been decided and Witness or
Discovery is moot as the case will be dismissed not on merit but, on CLUB
MEMBERSHIP to the Old Boys Network or the JUDGES CLUB ignoring the law of the
United States and other countries. That witness at hearings and discovery, is a pre-trial
procedure in a lawsuit in which each party, through the law of civil procedure , can obtain
evidence from the other party or parties by means of discovery devices such as a request for
answers to interrogatories , request for production of documents , request for admissions and
depositions . Discovery can be obtained from non-parties using subpoenas . When a discovery
request is objected to, the requesting party may seek the assistance of the court by filing a
motion to compel discovery. But, again these are Subpoenas for witness.

12. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life,
liberty or property without due process of law." The Fourteenth Amendment , ratified in
1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation
of all states. Rights associated with a fair trial are explicitly proclaimed in Article 10 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights , the Sixth Amendment to the United States
Constitution , and Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights , as well as
numerous other constitutions and declarations throughout the world. There is no binding

international law that defines what is not a fair trial; for example, the right to a jury trial and
other important procedures vary from nation to nation. You see less and less Jury Trials as it
takes away the power of the Judge.

13. That Judge Clark deprived Plaintiff when he gave Divorce lawyer Ilona Grenadier the right to
sell the home of Janice Wolk Grenadier when Janice found out he had a financial standing in
all properties owned. That Judge Clark further gave it to Ilona in the hopes of through
malicious prosecution to further harm mentally, physically Janice and her girls. That this
malicious behavior of the court appears to continue today

14. That Judge James Clark behavior will be shown to be the norm with the Virginia State and
Federal Judges. That Plaintiff if given Her day in Court as the United States Constitution and
the Virginia State Constitution calls for she will prove with firm evidence from discover all the
Criminal Actions as described in the criminal Complaint attached Exhibit 5

Relief Sought:

Sanctions against the Defendant for $58,00. (58 Subpoenas) and anything else this court finds
acceptable . Extension of time to Respond to the Motion to Dismiss and the basic right to Due Process
an open court hearing with witnesses. Relief Requested each subpoena takes at least hour that the
subpoenas have been now done twice and will need to be done a third time and should be done at the
expense of the defendant. That the $58,000. If for the 58 subpoenas, the coping using the hourly rate
as designated on Exhibit 4 by this court. That attached find the rate of lawyers done by this court that
Plaintiff has used as her rate, as she is not allowed by having to sign under penalty and perjury she has
not gotten assistance from an attorney should be paid as an attorney. The law allows for a pro se
litigant to collect legal fees in Sanctions.
That Plaintiff has been more than fair to all involved to only be abused and taken advantage of by
Defendant and Defendants council and the Judges assigned to this case.

Attached Exhibits:

Exhibit No. Description No. Pages

1 E Mail Dated May 2, 2017 request for Extension

2 Email May 6th of re-submit of subpoenas on May 10, 2017 that she would
file the change of day as of May 15, 2017 no change has been Dated I
am going to file for Extension
3 Email May 12, 2017 Plaintiff has been given new warning of threat on
her life
4 USDC of Northern Virginia cost of Legal fees as of March 3, 2013 $600.
For 29 years experience. The crimes against me started in or around
February 14, 1986 giving me over 29 years as a targeted victim
5 Outline of Corruption

May 15, 2017

Respectfully Submitted,

Janice Wolk Grenadier

15 W. Spring Street
Alexandria, VA 22301

CERTIFICATION: I declare under penalty and perjury: That (1) No attorney has prepared or assisted in the
preparation of this document. Janice Wolk Grenadier Name of Pro Se Party.
May 15, 2017

Where is Janice / Plaintiff on May 15, 2017 will sent through e-mail, hand deliver, or USPS mail to:

Margeaux. S. Serrano,
202 North Ninth Street
Richmond, VA 23219