Etesi Gabor: Antimatter and the Second Law of Thermodynamics

© All Rights Reserved

5 views

Etesi Gabor: Antimatter and the Second Law of Thermodynamics

© All Rights Reserved

- CLIL Methodology
- BIoenergetics.BTOL.cramer.25.9.07
- NEW HYPOTHESIS, MODELS AND EXPLANATIONS OF SCIENCE (AMENDED-3)
- Ranganathan_Hidden Roots of Classification_chp3
- Hawking Pursued His Work in Physics
- 317vas - 2nd Thoughts Regarding STL
- Yada Yah - Volume 1 In The Beginning - 01 - Hayah - Existence - In the Beginning...
- 365_practical_spirituality
- Matter or Energy
- Environmental Physics
- Quark Matter in the Solar System : Evidence for a Game-Changing Space Resource
- Uniformity and Variability Manuel de Landa
- Contact 62 (Magazine)
- Chemistry
- Btd Lession Plane
- corruption-Aristotle
- Nature of Gravity
- Charged Black Hole With a Scalar Hair in (2+1) Dimensions
- End Year Exam Fm 1 2007
- regPofM

You are on page 1of 4

Gabor Etesi

Department of Geometry, Mathematical Institute, Faculty of Science,

arXiv:1704.01750v2 [hep-th] 10 Apr 2017

Egry J. u. 1, H ep., H-1111 Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

In this letter we introduce a proposal that the second law of thermodynamics holds true for a

closed physical system consisting of pure antimatter in the thermodynamical limit, but in a reversed

form. We give two plausible arguments in favour to this proposal: one is based on the CPT theorem

of relativistic quantum field theories while the other one refers to Noethers theorem of theoretical

physics. However in our understanding the ultimate validity or invalidity of this idea can be decided

only by future physical experiments.

As a consequence of the proposal we argue that the dynamical evolution of pure macroscopic

antimatter systems can be very different from that of ordinary matter systems in the sense that

sufficiently massive antimatter systems could have stronger tendency to form black holes during

time evolution than their ordinary counterparts. Taking into account the various no-hair theorems

in black hole physics as well, as a result, antimatter could tracelessly disappear behind black hole

event horizons faster in time than ordinary matter. The observed asymmetry of matter and antimatter

could then be explained even if their presence in the Universe was symmetric in the beginning.

Keywords: Second law; Black holes; Matter-antimatter asymmetry

The idea of an antiparticle had quite unexpectedly dropped out from the theoretical efforts to reconcile

the basic principles of special relativity and quantum mechanics; shortly thereafter their individual

existence was verified using cosmic ray detectors, nuclear reactors and high energy particle colliders.

However no physical experiment or even any kind of human experience in the broadest sense exists so

far which could provide some phenomenological insight into the macroscopic i.e., thermodynamical

properties of pure antimatter built up from the bound states of these antiparticles. Even assuming that

the basic principles of (classical or quantum) statistical mechanics continue to hold for physical systems

consisting of pure antimatterand confessing that the derivation of the second law of thermodynamics

from these principles is yet problematicthe thermodynamical behaviour of such alien macroscopic

physical systems is, rigorously speaking, still unknown to us. Therefore apparently we are not in

e-mail: etesi@math.bme.hu

G. Etesi: Antimatter and the second law of thermodynamics 2

contradiction with any element of our contemporary description of physical reality if we make the

following counterintuitive

Proposal. Let Santimatter be a closed physical system consisting of pure antimatter (in the thermody-

namical limit). Then the entropy of this system never increases in time i.e., S(Santimatter ) 0.

Because challenging the Proposal experimentally or theoretically is not straightforward, we would like

to rather offer here two plausible arguments for its validity. However of course we acknowledge that

none of them can be considered as a physical (or even not to mention, a rigorous mathematical) proof

of the Proposal. Its ultimate validity or invalidity can be decided only with future physical experiments

designed to unfold the dynamics of large antimatter systems (in this context it is worth revisiting the

0 0

already observed asymmetry between the processes K 0 K and K K 0 as well, cf. [4]).

An argument based on the CPT theorem of relativistic quantum field theories. In light of our accu-

rate experimental evidences, we have no reason to doubt on the validity of the basic rules of relativistic

quantum field theory when applied to both matter and antimatter. One of the most fundamental re-

sults of the relativistic quantum field theoretic description of physical reality is the CPT theorem which

asserts that the triple action of time direction reversal (T ), spatial reflection (P) and charge conjuga-

tion (C), when applied to a physical system, represents a symmetry of it (cf. e.g. [6, Chapter I.5.8]).

Consider an ordinary closed physical system Smatter consisting of pure (normal) matter in the thermo-

dynamical limit, evolving forward in time. Therefore, as a theoretical consequence, the CPT theorem

about Smatter tells us that

CPT (Smatter ) = Smatter .

Another phenomenological fact about Smatter is the validity of the second law of thermodynamics

which states that

S(Smatter ) 0

i.e., the entropy of a closed physical system consisting of pure ordinary matter never decreases. Putting

together these we get

S(CPT (Smatter )) 0 .

However, accepting that the parity transformation P is a symmetry of a physical system in the thermo-

dynamical limit, the CPT transformation converts a closed physical system of matter evolving forward

in time into a closed physical system containing antimatter evolving backward in time i.e.,

i.e., the entropy of an antimatter system never decreases in reversed time hence switching back to

ordinary time we come up with

S(Santimatter ) 0

leading to the Proposal.

Another argument based on Noethers theorem of theoretical physics. Noethers theorem roughly

says that to every global symmetry of a closed physical system a conserved quantity can be associated

(cf. e.g. [6, Chapter I.7.3]). A closed physical system in the thermodynamical limiti.e., when a given

phenomenological macrostate is realized by a huge number of theoretical microstatespossesses a sort

of permutation symmetry, namely the transitions between the individual microstates which realize the

G. Etesi: Antimatter and the second law of thermodynamics 3

same macrostate. One may then raise the question that, in the spirit of Noethers theorem, what sort

of conserved quantity should belong to this permutation symmetry of a closed physical system in

the thermodynamical limit? The expected natural answer is that this quantity should be the entropy,

or equivalently, the information content of the macroscopic physical system. Accepting this naive

argumentation it follows as a theoretical consequence from it that the entropy of a closed and truely

complete physical system containing both matter and antimatter should be constant in time i.e.,

We added an appropriately defined radiation term Sradiation in order to take into account the recombi-

nation effects which certainly take place in a closed physical system with mixed matter content. The

additional phenomenological fact about Smatter + radiation is again the validity of the (generalized) sec-

ond law of thermodynamics in the form

S(Smatter + radiation ) 0 .

Comparing the last two expressions and referring to the (sub)additivity of the entropy we conclude that

S(Santimatter ) 0

ending up with the Proposal again. We emphasize that in both arguments the validity of the second

law as a phenomenological fact about macroscopic matter systems played a crucial role.

To close we would like to mention one consequence of the Proposal. Consider a closed macro-

scopic physical system Santimatter built up from pure antimatter only i.e., when it is not disturbed by

recombination effects of very short characteristic time. Accepting the Proposal for a moment, it says

that Santimatter tends to evolve into more-and-more ordered states in time. Assuming that macroscopic

antimatter systems satisfy the same equation of state (expressing a phenomenological relation between

their energy, temperature, pressure, volume, etc.) as the corresponding macroscopic ordinary matter

systems, this evolution into more-and-more ordered states could imply their stronger tendency for spa-

tial contraction. More precisely, in sharp contrast to an ordinary matter system, the structural tendency

of Santimatter for spatial contraction in its own gravitational field could be enhanced by the functional

tendency of Santimatter for spatial contraction through its reversed thermodynamics.1 Therefore, as a

result, one would expect that sufficiently massive macroscopic antimatter systems are more capable

to form black holes during the course of their dynamical evolution than ordinary macroscopic matter

systems. Consequently, in light of the various uniqueness (no-hair) theorems of black hole physics

(cf. e.g. [3]; and notice these theorems are particularly strong in four dimensions) pure macroscopic

antimatter systems could tracelessly disappear behind black hole event horizons faster in time than the

ordinary ones. For clarity we remark that this process is not in contradiction with Hawkings area the-

orem (cf. e.g. [1, 2]) because the fall of antimatter into a black hole, whatever weird its dynamical

behaviour is, continues to transport further mass, electric charge and angular momentum into the black

hole hence continues to increase the area of the instantaneous event horizon of e.g. the KerrNewman

black hole. Of course all of these rough qualitative considerations might be invalidated by analyzing the

highly complex details of time evolution of realistic physical systems; however this analysis is beyond

the limits of this short note.

1 Itis illustrive to regard the structural and functional characters as sort of spatial and temporal projections, respectively,

of a common abstract character of a physical system. In this language we can say that physical systems possess an abstract

contraction tendency whose structural and functional manifestations are the gravity and the thermodynamical phenomena,

respectively (cf. Verlindes idea of entropic gravity [5]) and they attenuate each other in the case of ordinary matter systems

while enhance each other in the case of antimatter systems.

G. Etesi: Antimatter and the second law of thermodynamics 4

Nevertheless our speculations might shed a light onto the origin of the observed matter-antimatter

asymmetry in the current Universe, even if matter and antimatter was produced in symmetric amounts

in the Big Bang. Indeed, if we assume that the initial matter-antimatter distribution in the Universe

contained small spatial inhomogeneities (caused e.g. by thermal fluctuations visible in current high-

resolution CMB data) then the undisturbed pure antimaterial spatial regions could collapse into black

holes faster than the pure material ones. This asymmetric mechanism together with the symmetric

recombination effects could be responsible for the deficit of antimatter as well as the rapid galaxy

formation in the observed Universe.

References

[1] Bardeen, J.M., Carter, B., Hawking, S.W.: The four laws of black hole mechanics, Comm. Math.

Phys. 31, 161-170 (1973);

[2] Hawking, S.W.: Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1344-

1346 (1971);

[3] Heusler, M.: Black hole uniqueness theorems, Cambridge Lecture Notes Phys. 6, Cambridge

Univ. Press, Cambridge (1996);

0

[4] Kabir, P.K.: Observed asymmetry in pp + K K 0 / K + K and relation to reciprocity, Phys.

Lett. B59, 335-340 (1999);

[5] Verlinde, E.P.: On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton, Journ. High Energy Phys. 04,

1104:029 (2011);

[6] Weinberg, S.: The quantum theory of fields I-III, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1995, 1996,

2000).

- CLIL MethodologyUploaded byKevin Taylor
- BIoenergetics.BTOL.cramer.25.9.07Uploaded bysubhoiitkgp
- NEW HYPOTHESIS, MODELS AND EXPLANATIONS OF SCIENCE (AMENDED-3)Uploaded byMd Abdul Alim
- Ranganathan_Hidden Roots of Classification_chp3Uploaded byRobert Endean Gamboa
- Hawking Pursued His Work in PhysicsUploaded byMarathi Calligraphy
- 317vas - 2nd Thoughts Regarding STLUploaded byapi-3734703
- Yada Yah - Volume 1 In The Beginning - 01 - Hayah - Existence - In the Beginning...Uploaded byyadayah
- 365_practical_spiritualityUploaded bySudha Rajesh
- Matter or EnergyUploaded byRanu Vikram
- Environmental PhysicsUploaded byEndah Kusumaningsih
- Quark Matter in the Solar System : Evidence for a Game-Changing Space ResourceUploaded byMarshall Eubanks
- Uniformity and Variability Manuel de LandaUploaded byPatrick Brennan
- Contact 62 (Magazine)Uploaded byShengping LUO
- ChemistryUploaded byKatherine Aquino
- Btd Lession PlaneUploaded bykumar
- corruption-AristotleUploaded byapi-3756205
- Nature of GravityUploaded byMossad News
- Charged Black Hole With a Scalar Hair in (2+1) DimensionsUploaded bycrocoali000
- End Year Exam Fm 1 2007Uploaded byNurul Fairuz Husna
- regPofMUploaded byRotaru
- lesson plan day 5Uploaded byapi-410884447
- ps2Uploaded bySimon EarthMan Barjona
- Estado SolidoUploaded byNanis2B
- Sintesis de Periodo 4Uploaded byTeacherMariat
- thermodynamics reviewUploaded byapi-326202885
- item 001 dec(1)7Uploaded byHarit Bala
- Zendo Rules Book 2Uploaded byWkrscribd
- De principiis naturae en inglés.docxUploaded byJosé Mares Chávez
- Harp MajorScienceThemesUploaded byharp_11
- 326Uploaded byNurul Fahmi Arief

- A New Approach to the Hard Problem - 07.14 - Final - KI - TSC 2014Uploaded byforizsl
- Conf Schedule SmallUploaded byforizsl
- Conformal Carroll Groups 1403.4213Uploaded byforizsl
- Cauchy Problem as a Two-surface Based Geometrodynamics 1409.4914Uploaded byforizsl
- !Mermin_Physics-QBism puts the scientist back into science_Nature_507421a.pdfUploaded byforizsl
- Be Here Now - NatureUploaded byforizsl
- A Renormalizable Theory of Quantum Gravity - Renormalization Proof of the Gauge Theory of Volume Preserving Diffeomorphisms 1308.2384Uploaded byforizsl
- How Well Do We Understand the Thermal History of the Universe - Implications of the Recent BICEP2 DataUploaded byforizsl
- Time Crystals From Minimum Time UncertaintyUploaded byforizsl
- The Physical Interpretation of DaseinisationUploaded byforizsl
- Some Negative Remarks on Operational Approaches to Quatum TheoryUploaded byforizsl
- 't Hooft the Firewall Transformation for Black Holes and Some of Its Implications 1612.08640Uploaded byforizsl
- Quantum Theory From Rules on Information AcquisitionUploaded byforizsl
- Delirium Quantum - Or, Where I Will Take Quantum Mechanics if It Will Let MeUploaded byforizsl
- The Problem of Space in the Light of Relativity - The Views of H. Weyl and E. CartanUploaded byforizsl
- On Participatory RealismUploaded byforizsl
- What is a Thing - Topos Theory in the Foundations of PhysicsUploaded byforizsl
- Testing Loop Quantum CosmologyUploaded byforizsl
- Quantum Measurement and the Paulian IdeaUploaded byforizsl
- The Atoms of Spacetime and the Cosmological ConstantUploaded byforizsl
- Back to Parmenides 2106Uploaded byforizsl
- -A Critique of the Determination of the Energy-momentum of a System From the Equations of Motion of Matter in the General Theory of RelativityUploaded byforizsl
- The 1965 Penrose Singularity TheoremUploaded byforizsl
- ! Konishi Time and a temporally statistical geometrodynamics (quantum brain dynamics) 2368.pdfUploaded byforizsl
- Irreducibility of the Ashtekar-Isham-Lewandowski RepresentationUploaded byforizsl
- Quantum Bayesianism at the PerimeterUploaded byforizsl
- !Spectral Properties of the Quantum Mixmaster Universe 1703.08462Uploaded byforizsl
- Antimatter and the Second Law of Thermodynamics 1704.01750Uploaded byforizsl

- Todd J. Desiato and Riccardo C. Storti- Warp Drive propulsion within Maxwell’s equationsUploaded byHerftez
- Sociology of EducationUploaded byJason Lindsey
- Lecture SM 12Uploaded byzcapg17
- Types of Conflict (1)Uploaded byLiviu Iordache
- Assignment No 1Uploaded byAnkitGhildiyal
- Z-DistributionUploaded byAamir Mukhtar
- LDR 531 Week 1 Quiz 100% ScoreUploaded byJames White
- Copernicus and KeplerUploaded byallanlalala
- Les Houches, StringsUploaded byAlberto Gallegos
- Ultimate Numerical Bound Estimation of Chaotic Dynamical Finance ModelUploaded byDharmendra Kumar
- Areas Under Normal CurveUploaded byEzekiel John Mappala Evardo
- III Sem. B.sc Mathematics-Complementary Course- Statistical Inference On10Dec2015Uploaded byலட்சுமணன் சு
- Diss KohlerUploaded byhellhawk123
- Simple Linear RegressionUploaded byইশতিয়াক হোসেন সিদ্দিকী
- 040627 Gold ProblemsUploaded byoitlali
- Kimet JusufiUploaded byFatlum Rushiti
- karl marx and theories of personalityUploaded byShubham Jain Modi
- My Role Model_albert EinsteinUploaded bySaurabh
- The Dirac OscillatorUploaded bySahil Chadha
- WKB Method and Some Applications- Gilad Amar.pdfUploaded byGilad Amar
- S4 - Review Excerise 1Uploaded byAhmed Nurul
- Huping Hu & Maoxin Wu, Follow-up on CERN's OPERA Neutrino ResultsUploaded byAnonymous 0U9j6BLllB
- Choosing a Statistical TestUploaded byDhayanand C
- ch09test.rtfUploaded bycool_sp
- ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS OF THE MODIFIED COULOMB POTENTIAL USING THE FACTORIZATION METHOD.Uploaded byIJRAP
- week1_Probability12Uploaded byKugan Mahendran Kgn
- Lecture on Theoretical Mechanics - 1Uploaded byAbhijit Kar Gupta
- COURSE 5 ECONOMETRICS 2009 chi square.pptUploaded byAlex Ionescu
- Klein Gordon and Dirac in Curved SpacetimeUploaded byzcapg17
- Model Specification.pdfUploaded byRukon Zaman