4 views

Uploaded by Waldemar Ziomek

Tested results for the vacuum gap withstand under different voltage excitation

- Resistance is Not Futile Lesson
- ASTM D 1389 – 97a Proof-Voltage Testing of Thin Solid Electrical Insulating
- 290
- Chinese FR Compound (Test Report )
- set 1(8) (Autosaved)
- Automotive Wiring Primer
- Unilap Iso 5kv
- Capetown 139
- Busbar-ShortCircuitEffects
- Practical Range of Acceptable Readings for a Particular Circuit Breaker
- 1 2 3 a SIM ElectricalCircuits 2
- Mini Pol
- Solvay - Sulphur Sf6
- Especificacion Tecnica Grupo Generador
- (10) 10.1016@j.measurement.2017.03.044
- CH1
- Wire splicing.docx
- Comparison Between Internal&External Stirrers
- KGUG en_a
- 2015-8-17 Fall EE483 Syllabus

You are on page 1of 4

Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved

0042-207X/94S7.00+.00

voltage conditions

K r z y s z t o f S i o d l a a n d W a l d e m a r Z i o m e k , Technical University of Poznan, The Institute of Electrical Power

Engineering, 3a Piotrowo Str, 60-965 Poznan, Poland

Although the electric strength of vacuum gap under various voltage conditions has been discussed in many papers,

research on this subject is still ongoing. The first stage of our investigations was examining the prebreakdown

state of vacuum gap under ac voltage excitation. Field electron emission in short vacuum gap (0-2 mm) and

microdischarges in long vacuum gap (over 10 mm) were analyzed. Field electron emission current was measured

with an unbalanced hv bridge. Next, using voltage-current characteristics analysis, the parameters of field electron

emission were obtained. The microdischarges phenomenon was monitored with a multichannel pulse-height

analyzer. The relation between breakdown voltage and the parameters characterizing prebreakdown phenomena

was then determined. Finally, the characteristics of electric strength under ac (50 Hz), switching impulse

(250/2500 I~S) and lightning impulse (1.2/50 #s) voltages were obtained. The investigations were carried out with

Cu-Cr contacts in a wide range of interelectrode distance (0.5-12 mm).

procedures, change of time parameters and impulse polarization.

Determining the electric strength of a vacuum insulating system

The other problem concerns the possibility of electric strength

is a very complex problem, because each breakdown causes

evaluation without necessity for the breakdown effect execution.

changes in the parameters characterizing the state of this system

According to our investigations this is possible using measure-

(e.g. the changes in surface micro-relief, residual gas pressure,

ments of parameters characterizing the prebreakdown state. We

physical and chemical structure of electrodes). It is practically

utilize the fact that electric strength depends on prebreakdown

impossible to effectively observe all parameters of a vacuum

phenomena intensity and their complex measurement should

system state, which makes precision evaluation of electric

allow us to evaluate vacuum system ability to initiate the break-

strength unachievable. The problem is more complicated in the

down effect. In these investigations we should consider that for

case of technical systems--the extinguishing chamber of a vac-

short vacuum gap (0-2 mm) the dominant phenomenon is field

uum interrupter, for example--because real vacuum and surface

electron emission and for long gap (over 10 mm) the micro-

conditions are unknown. We can determine these only indirectly,

discharges are typical. Therefore the measurements of the par-

through intensity evaluation of phenomena occurring under an

ameters characterizing the prebreakdown state according to both

electric field (e.g. field electron emission current, microdischarge

of those phenomena (i.e. microdischarges and field electron emis-

intensity, X-ray intensity). Thus there are two basic engineering

sion) should be applied. If we know the values of the parameters

tasks: (1) direct evaluation of electric strength of a vacuum

describing the prebreakdown state, we can define breakdown

system and its changes as a function of time, kind and parameters

voltage. We must take into account that increasing the field

of voltage, number of breakdowns, etc., and (2) forecasting

electron emission current increasing the local temperature, at

electric strength using relations between breakdown voltage

both the emission site on the cathode and in the electron-bom-

and the parameters describing the intensity of prebreakdown

barded area of the anode, results in thermal instability that finally

phenomena.

leads to breakdown. Also, the increase of charge transferred by

Exact evaluation of the electric strength of a vacuum insulating

microdischarges causes a rise of energy exchanged between the

system is obviously impossible, even after a conditioning process,

electrodes accompanied by an increase of local temperature--

because each breakdown changes the investigated object and

which finally results in breakdown ~ 3.

after subsequent breakdown electric strength is unknown again.

Direct evaluation of electric strength using breakdown voltage

2. Experimental procedure

measuring makes sense only for conditioned objects (e.g. after a

~ew dozen breakdowns) and in such cases we can give values for The test objects were extinguishing chambers of the vacuum

~:he central tendency of population and measures of variability interrupter of rated voltage equal to 12 kV. Electrodes were made

(e.g. range, standard deviation, population variance for normal of C u - C r sinter. Duging our investigations, the interelectrode

distribution). By means of statistical tests Chi-Square and gap was changed from 0.5 to 12 mm. Residual gas pressure was

Lambda-Kolmogorov) it has been determined that the break- of the order of 10 3 Pa.

down voltage distributions were described best by the Weibull's The vacuum interrupter chambers were first investigated under

and normal distributions. This note concerns both ac and atmospheric conditions but when flashover voltage across the

impulse voltages, but impulse strength is more difficult to external insulating surface of the envelope was lower than the

565

K Siodla and WZiomek: Electric strength of v a c u u m gap

the chamber was immersed in a tank of transformer oil in order

to improve its outer electric strength during tests.

kV :o",. i i i

For ac measurements (including prebreakdown state analy- 30

sis) the hv transformer 0.22/150 kV was used. As an impulse

voltage source the Haefely Multi Test Set was used. It produces

a switching impulse of 250/2500 /~s and lightning impulses of 2S

1.2/50/~s, of peak voltage up to 400 kV and energy up to 600 J.

Field emission current was measured in an hv unbalanced

bridge. The current sensitivity was 10- 6 A. Microdischarges were 20 ..................... -~"~-L~

measured using a typical arrangement for partial discharges

measurement, which was improved by a multichannel pulse-

height analyzer (1024-channels) combined with a micro-

computer.

15 I . . . . .

I

In order to determine the relations between breakdown voltage

and the parameters characterizing the prebreakdown state, the

iO

following procedure was repeated : voltage was raised from zero

to a preselected value, at which the parameters of prebreakdown

state could be taken; then voltage was raised until breakdown

occurred. After that, voltage was decreased to zero and the pro- 5

cedure was repeated. Further details about experimental pro-

cedure can be found in refs 3-8.

0

3. R e s u l t s and d i s c u s s i o n 500 600 700 000 900

The investigations were carried out in a wide range of inter- Figure 2. Breakdown voltage Ubas a function of electric field enhancement

electrode gap (from 0.5 to 12 mm). We were looking for relations factor J3. Interelectrode distance equal to 1.5 mm : Ub = 145013 062 [kV]

between breakdown voltage and the chosen parameters char- at r '~= 0.75.

acterizing the prebreakdown stage of the vacuum gap. The inves-

tigated relations were approximated using the simple regression

method with a few basic functions (linear, power, reciprocal,

voltage U, causing a field electron emission current equal to

exponential, logarithmic) and finally the function characterized

10-6 A. The relation Lib = f(U~) was approximated by a linear

by the greatest coefficient of determination r 2 was chosen.

function. The coefficient of determination r 2 was very high in the

Figure 1 presents the dependence of breakdown voltage Ub on

investigated relationship.

Figure 2 presents one chosen typical characteristic of break-

35 down voltage Ub as a function of field enhancement factor /L

This characteristic was obtained by the power function (in some

kV Ub i //

cases the linear approximation was also effective).

30 On the basis of the charge distributions and the content of

channels obtained during pulse-height analysis, we can choose

from among the other parameters, total charge Q transferred by

25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

microdischarges in count time, and the number of pulses N in

count time 6,7

In Figure 3 we see the relation of breakdown voltage to the

number of pulses counted within 60 s and in Figure 4 the depen-

20

dence of breakdown voltage upon total charge Q transferred

by microdischarges in the same time is shown. These relations

/ . . . . . . . .

were described by mathematical functions and determination

15

coefficients,

Figure 5 presents the comparison of breakdown voltage of the

vacuum chamber (internal--between electrodes, external--at the

10 surface of the envelope) under ac, LI, SI conditions for elec-

trodes set to a nominal distance of 12 mm. Mean values of

breakdown voltage are shown, dispersion of these results was in

the range of 1 5%. Such small values of dispersion were achieved

because the chamber was well prepared by the conditioning pro-

cess (conditioning by several hundred ac and impulse voltage

Ue

0 I I E I i t i i I t h i I breakdowns). Using the impulse factor k~, defined as the ratio of

5 iO i5 kV 20 impulse voltage to ac voltage in the same conditions, we notice

Figure 1. Relation between breakdown voltage Ub and voltage Uecausing its little changes for internal strength (k~ = 1.2-1.3) and bigger

field electron emission current of 10-6 A. Interelectrode distance equal changes for external strength (k~ = 1.3-1.7). The increase of

to 1 mm: Ub = 1.55Ue+7,7 [kV] at r 2 = 0.97. impulse breakdown voltage of positive polarity in vacuum and

566

KSiodla and WZiomek: Electric strength of v a c u u m gap

. . . . . . . . . . . . i'"

kV IUb. j . : ! 300

250

200

150

50

0

20 AC LI(-) Sl(-) Sl(+) LI(+)

ditions (AC voltage, lightning impulse voltage and switching impulse

voltage) for vacuum interrupter in the air (external strength) and

immersed in the transformer oil (internal strength). Electrode distance

2N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

equal to 12 ram.

0 I I I I F iII l I I P I II. I I [ I J r I

there is a certain a s y m m e t r y between the investigated object a n d

10 100 1000 pC 10000 the ground. The electrode u n d e r high voltage has less curvature

Figure 3. Relation of breakdown voltage to total charge Q transferred by t h a n the g r o u n d e d electrode.

microdischarges in count time equal to 60 s. Charge Q [pC] was measured Figure 6 shows the dependence o f b r e a k d o w n voltage o n inter-

at voltage of 45 kV (peak value): Ub = 116 Q 0.037 [kV] at r 2 = 0.72. electrode distance for ac, lightning a n d switching impulses o f

b o t h ( + ) a n d ( - ) polarities. It m a y be noticed that the value o f

b r e a k d o w n voltage is slightly d e p e n d e n t o n the v a c u u m gap

length in a range o f distances f r o m 4 to 12 mm. W h e n the distance

is smaller, i.e. 0.5 to 4 mm, b r e a k d o w n voltage strongly depends

o n the gap length. This dependence o f b r e a k d o w n voltage o n gap

length m a y be described by the power function Ub = ad b. F o r

150 I I

300 , , , p , , , [ , , , i , i , r r , r l l l ~ -

kV Ub

kV ub

IQB

200 .... i

....N-....

x'" ~ LI(+)

50 .......... ............. ...............

100

! 'x / /

"

.+- L I ( - )

~-

ST(+)

ST(-)

." ~ AC

X

0 J I r N d

0 ~ ~ J I ~ ~ ~ J , r ~ P J , t F r ~ ~ I ~ J z

ze 1oo looo 10000 loeeee

0 2 4 6 8 10 mm 12

Figure4. Breakdown voltage Ub as a function of number N of impulses.

The impulses were counted before breakdown during 60 s at voltage 45 Figure 6. Breakdown voltage (ac, LI, SI) as a function of interelectrode

kV (peak value) : Ub = 145 N -0'47 [kV] at r 2 = 0.96. distance d for a vacuum interrupter immersed in oil.

567

K Siodla and W Ziomek: Electric s t r e n g t h o f v a c u u m g a p

1.B i ~ i i i i i ~ i [ i i i I i ~ i ] i 4. C o n c l u s i o n s

LI(+) parameters characterizing prebreakdown state (voltage Ue, factor

+- L I ( - ) /3, charge Q, number of pulses N) prove that these parameters

~ ~ ~ $I(+) may be treated as evaluation criteria of electroinsulating prop-

't.B

E] $ I ( - ) erties of a vacuum gap.

A well-conditioned vacuum interrupter demonstrates much

greater internal electric strength than an external one. For a

nominal distance of 12 mm we can observe little differences in

internal strength independent of kind and polarity of impulse

voltage. Conversely, the external strength of a vacuum inter-

1.4 "",,"G~ ] rupter strongly depends on the kind and polarity of impulse

voltage. Asymmetry of the investigated object toward the ground

is observed the electrode under high voltage has virtually less

curvature than the grounded one.

Impulse breakdown voltage slightly changes in a wide range

1.R of interelectrode distance over 4 mm. The power function

describes well the relationship between breakdown voltage and

-T interelectrode distance with exponents ranging from 0.2 to 0.35

for impulse voltages, and an exponent equal to 0.4 for ac

voltage.

d I

0 R 4 6 8 10 mm 1R

Figure 7. Impulse factor k~ as a function of interelectrode distance d for References

internal strength for vacuum interrupter (immersed in transformer oil).

~R V Latham, High Voltage Vacuum Insulation. The Physical Basis.

Academic Press, London, New York, Sydney (1981).

2G A Mesyats and D J Proskurovsky, Pulsed Electrical Discharge in

Vacuum. Springer, Berlin (1989).

lightning and switching impulse voltages the exponent b is in 3H Moscicka-Grzesiak, K Siodla and W Ziomek, Vllth lnt Syrup on

the range of 0.2-0.35, and factor a varies from 142 to 149, at High Voltage Engn9, Dresden, Germany (1991).

determination coefficient r 2 = 0.85-0.95. For ac voltage b = 0.4, 4K Siodla, XIVth Int Symp on Discharges and Electrieal Insulation in

Vacuum, Santa Fe, USA (1990).

a = 88 and r 2 = 0.95. Such values of the determination co- sW Ziomek and H Moscicka-Grzesiak, 19901EEE Int Symp on Electrical

efficient, so close to unity, mean that the presented dependence Insulation, Toronto, Canada (1990).

of breakdown voltage on electrode distance is very strong. 6W Ziomek and H Moscicka-Grzesiak, Xth Int Conf on Gas Discharges

In Figure 7 the impulse factor k~ vs gap distance is presented. and Their Applications, Swansea, UK (1992).

7W Ziomek and H Moscicka-Grzesiak, XVth Int Symp on Discharges

We see that this factor has got a similar run for all kinds of impulses and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, Darmstadt, Germany (1992).

with values above 1.5 for distances less than 2 mm and less than K Siodla and P Zubielik, XVth Int Symp on Discharges and Electrical

1.3 for nominal gap equal to 12 mm. Insulation in Vacuum, Darmstadt, Germany (1992).

568

- Resistance is Not Futile LessonUploaded byHeroid
- ASTM D 1389 – 97a Proof-Voltage Testing of Thin Solid Electrical InsulatingUploaded byalin2005
- 290Uploaded byAnonymous DJYuU5ymD
- Chinese FR Compound (Test Report )Uploaded byjamil
- set 1(8) (Autosaved)Uploaded byhks18889dude
- Automotive Wiring PrimerUploaded byrollrams
- Unilap Iso 5kvUploaded byflorin071
- Capetown 139Uploaded bypaco
- Busbar-ShortCircuitEffectsUploaded byjung2008
- Practical Range of Acceptable Readings for a Particular Circuit BreakerUploaded byabdulyunus_amir
- 1 2 3 a SIM ElectricalCircuits 2Uploaded byHarvirChima
- Mini PolUploaded byjimatabb
- Solvay - Sulphur Sf6Uploaded byRudolf Steiner
- Especificacion Tecnica Grupo GeneradorUploaded byRicardo Dejtiar
- (10) 10.1016@j.measurement.2017.03.044Uploaded byTaryo
- CH1Uploaded byMuhammad Zainul Abidin
- Wire splicing.docxUploaded byRey Baculo
- Comparison Between Internal&External StirrersUploaded bydertas6641
- KGUG en_aUploaded bymoiseiosua
- 2015-8-17 Fall EE483 SyllabusUploaded byTracyLongRoberts
- Denon Dp-300f Service en JpUploaded byjoshuaajohn

- Ziomek Paper 025 Cigre-iec 2016 - DC transformer bushing replacement program in MH HVDC converter stationsUploaded byWaldemar Ziomek
- Ziomek 1995 ISH - Analysis of RF Interference in Vacuum Insulating Systems - Analog and Digital Methods - WebUploaded byWaldemar Ziomek
- Paper # 719_CIGRECanada2015- Ziomek - Performance of Power Transformers Under GIC R3Uploaded byWaldemar Ziomek
- Gombrowicz Witold - Trans-AtlantykUploaded byWaldemar Ziomek
- Provost - Transformer Technology for the 21st CenturyUploaded byWaldemar Ziomek
- Ziomek 1995 ISH - Relationship Between Residual Gas Pressure and Microdischarge Activity in Vacuum - Small FileUploaded byWaldemar Ziomek
- Conan-Doyle - The Adventures of Sherlock HolmesUploaded byWaldemar Ziomek
- Phase Shifting TransformersUploaded byWaldemar Ziomek
- D23_ABB_Stark Winfarm and HVDC LightUploaded byWaldemar Ziomek
- Arc Flash GE Article on Transformer Oil AnalysisUploaded byRichard Flynn
- Areva 2006 - International Developments in HVDCUploaded byWaldemar Ziomek
- Writing in English a Practical Handbook for Scientific and Technical WritersUploaded byfreeplump3

- DonaldsonUploaded byZulfiqar Ali
- Corporate GovernanceUploaded byKunj Shah
- UWP Adaptive DesignUploaded byhaovn577
- Derrick Centrifuges LRUploaded bySergio A. Rdz. F.
- WHO Staging ChildrenUploaded byibeaver
- ZNVUploaded byKassandraAdams
- Rayoptics WebinarUploaded bygordansim
- mech5_(1)Uploaded byManav
- A Stone Down Below a UrethralUploaded byaxl___
- NMC CoursesUploaded byMalik Dan Wirda
- Huang Li Annex18 Freiburg Nov052008Uploaded byJane Louis
- facebook stinks and here is whyUploaded byDaniel J Towsey A Truth Soldier
- Alexander Wilson - Perfomance Technology, AnamnesisUploaded by01ek
- Cable to Cable Connection for Thermite WeldingUploaded byAmiableimpex
- 2. Menu Dinamis Framework CI + template adminLTE + mysql - Copy (2)Uploaded byJalem Putro
- BridgeUploaded bygendadeyu552625
- Multiple IntelligencesUploaded byIsabel Hughes
- SFPD 2013 Annual Report July 30 2014Uploaded byOcean Beach Bulletin
- off-road driving.pdfUploaded byKizaHimmler
- June 2007 eBook EditionsUploaded byBlargh Orgh
- Cadence Pharmaceuticals et. al. v. Fresenius KabiUploaded byPatentBlast
- Chap_5_Basic_OOP.pdfUploaded bycnivaz
- Gap FillUploaded byAntonio J. Esteban Campuzano
- Power Systems GroundingUploaded bySayed Nagy
- Vehicle Entry Check ListUploaded bycgnanapon
- Market Research PresentationUploaded byneha
- Lectures on EnzymesUploaded byProf Rakesh Sharma
- Large Index of Refraction With EITUploaded byAsi Eilam
- Oz 3rd FloorUploaded byJohnBenedictRaz
- Experiment to Find the Optimal Design for a Carbon Dioxide Propelled TorpedoUploaded byJakeLevi