8 views

Uploaded by Wan

Determine soil bearing capacity

save

- @_Breakwater Foundation Stability
- Soil Spring Constant.xls
- Bearing Capacity
- shhivfg
- Chapter2-2011
- ijnaoe-2015-0016
- 2015 Foundation-Design Brochure
- IRJET-Studies on Floating Under reamed Economical Cemented Stone Columns For Bearing Capacity Improvement of Black Cotton Soil
- geotech report
- Shallow
- Determination of Ultimate Pile Bearing Capacity From a Seismic Method of Shear Wave Velocity in Comparison With Conventional Methods
- Pile Load Test
- CHANCE Helical Foundations for Telecom Structures
- Technology Assessment Framework
- Why
- SS Gravity Calculations 4.3
- 01_G11_Intro_09
- Problems of Durability
- Zweli Mkhize Full Cogta Speech
- Advisory Note 1-09 on Earth Retaining or Stabilising Structures (Erss)
- dd
- Comparison of Limit Equilibrium and Limit Analysis for Complex Slopes
- Calculation of Band Drains
- RC Pile Interaction Diagram
- lecture03_4on1.pdf
- Caisson Piles Design & Construction
- PVD Spreadsheet_Example 2
- NOTA%20KURSUS%20TAHUN%202006%20-%20Analisa%20Kesetabilan%20Cerun%20dan%20Rekabentuk%20Tembok%20Penahan%20-%2016-05-2006%20.pdf
- Bq - Police Marine Jetty-lmut
- Design of Retaining Wall
- Case Study on Slope Failure
- Design of Reinforced Concrete Structure - Volume 1 - DR. Mashhour A. Ghoneim.pdf
- Sg. Lebam -Bq (Bridge Only)
- Q1-PART1
- New Proposal High Speed Train in Malaysia
- Alpaxl Cir
- Final Report Ers
- Cam Clay
- #Lecture 3 - Cam Clay Undrained Comp
- Bore Pile Design Design by IrWanAzri
- Slope Stability Anderson & Md Noor
- Report 1 by WanAzri-2009919835
- MainBridge - Design Report
- Vane Shear Test.pdf

You are on page 1of 21

:

ACE VECTOR SDN BHD

SOIL BEARING CAPACITY BY TERZAGHI

ENGINEERING CONSULTANT Design Code/Ref:

Company No. 405601-M

Client:- Designed by :- Checked by :-

CODE REF. CALCULATIONS & SKECTHES

Compute the allowable bearing pressure using Terzaghi equation for the footing and soil parame

Figure 1.

**D = 3.00 m footing embedment depth
**

g = 18.0 kN/m³ soil density

Ø = 0 deg angle of internal friction

c = 40 kPa cohesion of soil

B = 2.0 m footing size

Footing Type: strip

1.0 Find the bearing capacity. Note that this value is usually the result of geotechnical investigat

Since:

Ø = 0 deg

Therefore from Table 4-2: From Table 4-1

Nc = 5.7 sc = 1.3

Nq = 1 sγ = 0.8

Nγ = 0.0

q = 54 =D*g

**qult = ( 350.4 + 0.00 B ) kPa
**

qult = 350.4 kPa

qa = qult

Eq. 4-1 SF

SF = 3 Factor of Safety

qa = 116.8 kPa allowable bearing capacity

1 50 347.4 141 45 172.5 415.0 0.9 780.2 36.4 5.3 100.5 298 48 258.7 52 geotechnical investigation.1 1153.7 35 30 37. deg Nc Nq Ng Kpg 0 5.1 12.0 round 1.2 14.3 297.3 173.0 1.0 25 25.8 .4 82 40 95.5 12.7 1.0 10.5 19.2 800 Table 4-1 For: sc sg strip 1.0 25.6 0.6 2.5 18.4 2.8 5 7.8 41. 34 56.5 36.2 10 9.7 15 12.BY TERZAGHI Date: 10-Jul-17 Reviewed by :.6 20 17. f.0 35 57.7 81.3 0.3 0. Division :- Geotechnical HES References ooting and soil parameters shown in Table 4-2 Bearing-capacity factors for the Terzaghi Equations Values of Ng for f of 0.4 42. 34 and 48o are original Terzagui values and used to back-compute Kpg.6 square 1.9 4.3 1.7 1.2 22.7 9.7 7.3 287.

.

ghi Equations .

405601-M Client:.0 Design Parameters Braja M. 2.3 Meyerhof's bearing capacity factor: Since: f = 2 deg Nc = 5.00 m L= 2. 2.01 3.67 Eq. CALCULATIONS & SKECTHES Shallow Foundati P on.0 kPa Df f= 2 deg g= 18 kN/m³ B 2.0 From Table 2.0 Determine the ultimate vertical load that the foundation can cary by using Meyerhof's Eq.63 Nq = 1. 2. by 1.83 Eq.214 .1 Refer from Table 2.5 Summary of shape and depth factors. Checked by :- CODE REF.50 m c= 50. Designed by :. Subject: ACE VECTOR SDN BHD SHALLOW FOUNDT'N/SOIL BEARING CAPACITY B ENGINEERING CONSULTANT Design Code/Ref: Company No. lcs = 1. 2.72 3.66 Eq. Das B= 2.00 m D= 1.2 Ng = 0.

0 kPa qu = 433.107 lcd = 1. lqs = 1.078 Therefore: from Eq.107 lgs = 1.078 lgd = 1. 2.83 q = 27.59 SF = 3 Factor of Safety qa = 144.155 lqd = 1.53 .

83 6.16 1.32 9.35 2.66 18 13.L BEARING CAPACITY BY MEYERHOF Date: 10-Jul-17 Reviewed by :.53 2.80 14.72 0.01 3 5.77 26 22.77 1.44 13.26 2.09 0.25 11.85 8.81 3.66).47 12 9. Division :- Geotechnical References THES Table 2.37 11 8.67 20.93 5.07 3.02 4 6.59 0.67 31 32. 5 6.00 1 5.19 1.94 1.63 4.31 0.80 2.40 20 14.80 2.13 16 11.37 3.90 1.15 8 7. (2.05 8.28 10 8.07 6 6.46 28 25.82 24 19.11 7 7.82 4.40 15.06 0.57 0.42 22 16.67).00 0.60 5.92 2.28 2.24 30 30.72 11.19 29 27.97 0.38 1.87 21 15.14 18. and (2.38 17 12.07 23 18.49 1.72 10.63 1.94 13.25 0.72)] f Nc Nq Ng FGL 0 5.60 13 9.34 1.92 15 10.00 27 23.71 0.21 9 7.20 0.63 18.3 Variation of meyerhof's Bearing Capacity Factors N [Eqs.81 1.47 0.56 .82 7.34 4.14 1.20 9.66 6.72 25 20.002 2 5.88 7.74 14 10.43 0. 2.26 0.88 0.86 16.40 2.98 3.00 19 13.66 4.04 ary by using Meyerhof's values.10 5.

44 49 229.88 262.87 55.31 64.31 526.1 158.31 211.02 33 38.41 45 133.51 328.73 47 173.69 41 83.96 77.75 44.07 39 67.51 674.33 40 75.44 31.92 53.11 99.99 42 93.15 35 46.32 35.88 134.49 23.27 38 61.71 85.26 222.64 187.74 46 152.20 93.93 265.59 37.43 37 55.32 43 105.63 42.89 319.86 73.38 139.15 36 50.90 113.07 873.09 26.64 26.84 .91 50 266.14 44 118.18 22.37 115.21 414.35 48.16 29.32 48 199.93 64.17 34 42.12 33.30 37.02 171.

ring Capacity Factors Nc. and Ng . Nq.

.

40 m P= L = 2.0 y ex My ey L' X L 2ex B' 2ey B V My c Figure 1.00 m c1 = 0.0 Design Parameters Columns: Footing: Loads: B = 2.00 m c2 = 0. CALCULATIONS & SKECTHES 1.BEARING CAPACITY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT Design Code/Ref: Company No. 405601-M Client:.0 m SF = 3. Checked by :- CODE REF.40 m Mx = My = Soil Parameters: f = 20 deg g = 18 kN/m³ c = 40 kPa d = 6.1 m water table depth D = 3. Subject: ACE VECTOR SDN BHD HANZEN . Designed by :.0 .

0 qult = 2383 kPa For SF = 3.315 D/B = 1.0 not 0.20 B/6 = 0. if SF =3.0 ey = 0.0 2.0 not 0. B' = 1.5 sc = 1.25 ex = 0.53 dc = 1. A.0 gi = 1.0 for all f as per Table 4.0 the allowable soil pressure qa is . Ok.49 Nq/Nc = 0.2 < B given. Ok.50 m ( B' < L' ) L' = 1.60 Ok! dy = 1.0 bi = 1.562 2 tanf(1-sinf)2 = 0.33 m > e Bmin = 1.60 sq = 1.47 sy = 0. Bowles ii = 1.0 not 0.4 < B given.60 m ( L' > B' ) From: Table 4-4 at f = 20 deg Nc = 14.5a from J. Lmin = 1.83 Nq = 8.34 Ng = 6. Figure 1.0 Required: Allowable soil pressure.63 > 0.32 dq = 1.

and with such a large load involved this in cetainly not the location to be excessively conservative. and the actual soil pressure qact is also large. qa = 794 kPa The actual soil pressure is: qact = 750 kPa * Note : Note that the allowable pressure qa is very large. . Some geotechnical consultants routenly limit the pressure to around 500 kPa in recommendations to clients for design wheter settlement is a factor or not. Small footings with large column loads confidence-inspiring during construction.

49 1.0 40 75. Hanzen.7 32 35.1 36 50.7 10.1 10 8.9 1.5 262.25 64.4 871.31 48.4 X 38 61.0 5 6.25 11.97 3.7 40.8 22. be 1800 kN Note that Nc & Nq are the same for all three methods.4 2.9 25 20.79 14.4 15 10.4 93.14 29.8 26 22.71 10.0 34 42.9 8.4 15.3 50 266. Division :- Geotechnical ECTHES References Table 4-4 Bering-capacity factors for the Meyerhof.2 30 30.0 0.8 6.83 6.34 2.14 1.73 134.9 2.47 23.2 20.2 1.1 15.7 200.4 0.7 31.0 0. subscripts id 450 kN-m f Nc Nq Ng(H) Ng(M) 360 kN-m 0 5.5 567.9 11.0 28 25. Date: 10-Jul-17 Reviewed by :.1 64.6 0.5 318.8 7.1 79.5 0.13 18.4 28.9 56.55 37. and Vesic's.6 45 133.0 44.1 0.7 D d .1 20 14.7 6.

Bowles . A.om J.

.otechnical consultants routenly limit the maximum allowable soil Small footings with large column loads are visually not very n to be excessively conservative.

2 0.0 0.007 0. bearing capacity equations three methods.294 5.2 0.3 0.311 12.4 0.296 0.276 41.214 271.247 77.514 0.hof. and Vesic's.4 0.3 1.9 0.242 0.9 0.131 .172 761.359 0.241 2.146 1.4 0.7 0.195 0.852 0.195 0. Hanzen.231 109.2 0.308 16.289 30.746 0.299 22.610 0.797 0.653 0.533 0.5 0.698 0.262 56.570 0. subscripts identity author for Ng Ng(V) Nq/Nc 2 tanf(1-sinf)2 0.6 0.431 0.0 0.000 0.3 1.315 10.

- @_Breakwater Foundation StabilityUploaded byapi-3709579
- Soil Spring Constant.xlsUploaded byrahul vaish
- Bearing CapacityUploaded byRaul Zapana Zela
- shhivfgUploaded byShivpreet Sharma
- Chapter2-2011Uploaded byAbdelrahman Omar Hindi
- ijnaoe-2015-0016Uploaded byPrisca Evelyn
- 2015 Foundation-Design BrochureUploaded byJaher Wasim
- IRJET-Studies on Floating Under reamed Economical Cemented Stone Columns For Bearing Capacity Improvement of Black Cotton SoilUploaded byIRJET Journal
- geotech reportUploaded byVasu Deva Rao Chilukuri
- ShallowUploaded byMuhamad Farhan
- Determination of Ultimate Pile Bearing Capacity From a Seismic Method of Shear Wave Velocity in Comparison With Conventional MethodsUploaded byAndrea Deleon
- Pile Load TestUploaded byChristian Jhansi
- CHANCE Helical Foundations for Telecom StructuresUploaded byMN Titas Titas
- Technology Assessment FrameworkUploaded bykrishnalotia8044
- WhyUploaded byJuliana Patiño Restrepo
- SS Gravity Calculations 4.3Uploaded byasingh400
- 01_G11_Intro_09Uploaded byFatmah El Wardagy
- Problems of DurabilityUploaded byPablo
- Zweli Mkhize Full Cogta SpeechUploaded byMashadi Kekana
- Advisory Note 1-09 on Earth Retaining or Stabilising Structures (Erss)Uploaded byDifa Liu
- ddUploaded bySa Gusnug Roho
- Comparison of Limit Equilibrium and Limit Analysis for Complex SlopesUploaded bySathyamoorthy Venkatesh

- Calculation of Band DrainsUploaded byWan
- RC Pile Interaction DiagramUploaded byWan
- lecture03_4on1.pdfUploaded byWan
- Caisson Piles Design & ConstructionUploaded byWan
- PVD Spreadsheet_Example 2Uploaded byWan
- NOTA%20KURSUS%20TAHUN%202006%20-%20Analisa%20Kesetabilan%20Cerun%20dan%20Rekabentuk%20Tembok%20Penahan%20-%2016-05-2006%20.pdfUploaded byWan
- Bq - Police Marine Jetty-lmutUploaded byWan
- Design of Retaining WallUploaded byWan
- Case Study on Slope FailureUploaded byWan
- Design of Reinforced Concrete Structure - Volume 1 - DR. Mashhour A. Ghoneim.pdfUploaded byWan
- Sg. Lebam -Bq (Bridge Only)Uploaded byWan
- Q1-PART1Uploaded byWan
- New Proposal High Speed Train in MalaysiaUploaded byWan
- Alpaxl CirUploaded byWan
- Final Report ErsUploaded byWan
- Cam ClayUploaded byWan
- #Lecture 3 - Cam Clay Undrained CompUploaded byWan
- Bore Pile Design Design by IrWanAzriUploaded byWan
- Slope Stability Anderson & Md NoorUploaded byWan
- Report 1 by WanAzri-2009919835Uploaded byWan
- MainBridge - Design ReportUploaded byWan
- Vane Shear Test.pdfUploaded byWan