You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 67, No.

217 / Friday, November 8, 2002 / Notices 68115

CIG’s Drennan Road Meter Station in will not serve to make the filer a party final Commission order approving or
Colorado Springs, Colorado. to the proceeding. The Commission’s denying a certificate will be issued.
CIG states that the proposed facilities rules require that persons filing
will provide Valley Line customers with Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
comments in opposition to the project
50,000 Dth per day of flexibility during Deputy Secretary.
provide copies of their protests only to
the summer season and an additional the party or parties directly involved in [FR Doc. 02–28439 Filed 11–7–02; 8:45 am]
42,150 Dth per day of incremental the protest. BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
capacity. CIG estimates that the cost of
Persons who wish to comment only
the proposed Summer-time
on the environmental review of this DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Enhancement Project facilities will be
$9,753,100 and that cost of the Valley project should submit an original and
Line 2003 Expansion Project will be two copies of their comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory
$13,237,800 for a total cost of Secretary of the Commission. Commission
$22,990,900. CIG states that it will not Environmental commenters will be [Docket No. RP03–44–000]
initially seek any rate recovery for the placed on the Commission’s
costs associated with the Summer-time environmental mailing list, will receive Enbridge Pipelines (UTOS) L.L.C.;
Enhancement Project. CIG states that it copies of the environmental documents, Notice of Filing of Offer of Settlement
seeks rolled-in rate treatment for the and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission’s November 1, 2002.
costs associated with the Valley Line
2003 Expansion Project facilities. environmental review process. Take notice that on October 28, 2002,
Any questions regarding this Environmental commenters will not be Enbridge Pipelines (UTOS) L.L.C.
application should be directed to Robert required to serve copies of filed (UTOS), pursuant to Rule 602 of the
T. Tomlinson, Director, Regulatory documents on all other parties. Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Affairs, Colorado Interstate Gas However, the non-party commenters Procedure, 18 CFR 385–602 (2002), filed
Company, P.O. Box 1087, Colorado will not receive copies of all documents an Offer of Settlement (Settlement) in
Springs, Colorado 80944 at (719) 520– filed by other parties or issued by the the captioned proceedings.
3788 or by fax at (719) 667–7534 or Judy Commission (except for the mailing of UTOS states that the Settlement
Heineman, Vice President and General environmental documents issued by the resolves UTOS’s general Section 4(e)
Counsel, Colorado Interstate Gas Commission) and will not have the right rate filing obligation presently set for
Company, P.O. Box 1087, Colorado to seek court review of the January 2, 2003, pursuant to the
Springs, Colorado 80944 at (719) 520– Commission’s final order. Commission’s October 8, 1998 Notice of
4829 or by fax at (719) 520–4898. Extension of Time in Docket Nos. RP94–
The Commission may issue a 161–000, et al. UTOS further states that
There are two ways to become
preliminary determination on non- shippers representing approximately
involved in the Commission’s review of
environmental issues prior to the 91% of its present system throughput
this project. First, any person wishing to
completion of its review of the either did not oppose or took no
obtain legal status by becoming a party
environmental aspects of the project. position relative to the Settlement.
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before November 21, 2002, This preliminary determination According to UTOS, under the
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory typically considers such issues as the Settlement, it will not be required to
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., need for the project and its economic make such general rate filing, thus
Washington, DC 20426, a motion to effect on existing customers of the permitting its currently effective rates to
intervene in accordance with the applicant, on other pipelines in the area, remain in effect until subsequently
requirements of the Commission’s Rules and on landowners and communities. changed. As a result, UTOS says, the
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR For example, the Commission considers Settlement promotes administrative
385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations the extent to which the applicant may efficiencies by providing rate certainty
under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A need to exercise eminent domain to for all concerned, while at the same
person obtaining party status will be obtain rights-of-way for the proposed time avoiding the time and expense that
placed on the service list maintained by project and balances that against the would otherwise be attendant to a
the Secretary of the Commission and non-environmental benefits to be general Section 4(e) rate filing.
will receive copies of all documents provided by the project. Therefore, if a Pursuant to Rule 602(f)(2) Initial
filed by the applicant and by all other person has comments on community Comments on the Settlement are due by
parties. A party must submit 14 copies and landowner impacts from this November 18, 2002, and Reply
of filings made with the Commission proposal, it is important either to file Comments are due by November 27,
and must mail a copy to the applicant comments or to intervene as early in the 2002.
and to every other party in the process as possible. This filing is available for review at
proceeding. Only parties to the the Commission in the Public Reference
The Commission strongly encourages Room or may be viewed on the
proceeding can ask for court review of
electronic filings of comments, protests, Commission’s website at http://
Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to and interventions via the internet in lieu www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘FERRIS’’ link.
intervene in order to have comments of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) Enter the docket number excluding the
considered. The second way to and the instructions on the last three digits in the docket number
participate is by filing with the Commission’s web site under the ‘‘e- field to access the document. For
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as Filing’’ link. Assistance, please contact FERC Online
possible, an original and two copies of If the Commission decides to set the Support at
comments in support of or in opposition application for a formal hearing before FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll-
to this project. The Commission will an Administrative Law Judge, the free at (866) 208–3676, or TTY, contact
consider these comments in Commission will issue another notice (202) 502–8659. Comments, protests and
determining the appropriate action to be describing that process. At the end of interventions may be filed electronically
taken, but the filing of a comment alone the Commission’s review process, a via the Internet in lieu of paper. The

VerDate 0ct<31>2002 16:24 Nov 07, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM 08NON1
68116 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2002 / Notices

Commission strongly encourages Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
electronic filings. See, 18 CFR last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions field to access the document. For Assistance, please contact FERC Online
on the Commission’s web site under the Assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
‘‘e-Filing’’ link. Support at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll-
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll- free at (866) 208–3676, or TTY, contact
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
free at (866) 208–3676, or TTY, contact (202) 502–8659. Comments, protests and
Deputy Secretary. (202) 502–8659. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
[FR Doc. 02–28447 Filed 11–7–02; 8:45 am] interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. The
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P via the Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages
Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See, 18 CFR
electronic filings. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission’s web site under the
Federal Energy Regulatory on the Commission’s web site under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Commission ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
[Docket No. RP99–220–013] Linwood A. Watson, Jr., Deputy Secretary.
Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 02–28446 Filed 11–7–02; 8:45 am]
Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited [FR Doc. 02–28449 Filed 11–7–02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
Partnership; Notice of Negotiated Rate BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
Agreement
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
November 1, 2002. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Take notice that on October 30, 2002, Federal Energy Regulatory
Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Partnership (Great Lakes) filed for Commission [Docket No. EL03–12–000]
disclosure, a transportation service
[Docket No. RP02–533–000]
agreement pursuant to Great Lakes’ Rate Kinder Morgan Michigan, LLC,
Schedule FT entered into by Great Lakes Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Complainant, v. Michigan Electric
and Nexen Marketing U.S.A. Inc. Transmission, LLC; Notice of Request Transmission Company, LLC,
(Nexen) (FT Service Agreement). The FT for Waiver Respondent; Notice of Complaint
Service Agreement being filed reflects a
negotiated rate arrangement between November 1, 2002. October 18, 2002.
Great Lakes and Nexen commencing Take notice that on September 4, Take notice that on October 15, 2002,
November 1, 2002. 2002, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Kinder Morgan Michigan, L.L.C. (KMM)
Great Lakes states that the FT Service Transmission LLC (KMIGT) tendered for filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Agreement is being filed to implement filing a request for a one-time waiver of Commission (Commission) a complaint
a negotiated rate contract as required by certain notice and timing requirements under section 206 of the Federal Power
both Great Lakes’ negotiated rate tariff of Section 29.a of its FERC Gas Tariff, Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e (1994), and section
provisions and the Commission’s Fourth Revised Volume No. I–B, relating 206 of the Commission’s Rules of
Statement of Policy on Alternatives to to the assessment of an Operational Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 206,
Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking Flow Order (OFO) penalty to Kansas against Michigan Electric Transmission
for Natural Gas Pipelines and Gas Service, a Division of OneOk, Inc. Company, LLC (METC) requesting that
Regulation of Negotiated Transportation KMIGT states that copies of the filing the Commission find that the terms and
Services of Natural Gas Pipelines, have been served upon transportation conditions of KMM’s Generator
issued January 31, 1996, at Docket Nos. and storage shippers and affected state Interconnection and Operating
RM95–6–000 and RM96–7–000. regulatory bodies. Agreement with METC violate
Any person desiring to be heard or to Any person desiring to be heard or to Commission policy and precedent, and
protest said filing should file a motion protest said filing should file a motion are unjust and unreasonable.
to intervene or a protest with the to intervene or a protest with the Any person desiring to be heard or to
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, protest this filing should file with the
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
20426, in accordance with sections 20426, in accordance with Sections 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC
385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission’s 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission’s 20426, in accordance with Rules 211
rules and regulations. All such motions Rules and Regulations. All such motions and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of
or protests must be filed in accordance or protests must be filed on or before Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211
with section 154.210 of the November 8, 2002. Protests will be and 385.214). Protests will be
Commission’s regulations. Protests will considered by the Commission in considered by the Commission in
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be determining the appropriate action to be
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make taken, but will not serve to make
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. protestants parties to the proceeding.
protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party Any person wishing to become a party
Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. This must file a motion to intervene. The
must file a motion to intervene. This filing is available for review at the answer to the complaint and all
filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference comments, interventions or protests
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the must be filed on or before October 25,
Room or may be viewed on the Commission’s website at http:// 2002 . This filing is available for review
Commission’s website at http:// www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘FERRIS’’ link. at the Commission in the Public
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘FERRIS’’ link. Enter the docket number excluding the Reference Room or may be viewed on

VerDate 0ct<31>2002 16:24 Nov 07, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM 08NON1