Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Early Man in the New World: A survey of the archaeological evidence suggests that a number
of specialized tool complexes were widely distributed in the Americas before 12,000 years ago
Author(s): Richard S. MacNeish
Source: American Scientist, Vol. 64, No. 3 (May-June 1976), pp. 316-327
Published by: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27847257 .
Accessed: 02/11/2013 22:39
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to American Scientist.
http://www.jstor.org
The peopling of the New World An important feature of the theory is discernible human activity of these
how and when itbegan and what may the "invisibility" of the Paleoindians early men is their subsistence pat
have been its consequences-is a as they proceeded southward. The terns. Thus, the stages to some degree
question of great interest to ar paucity of sites where human artifacts represent a classification of subsis
chaeologists and prehistorians. Be are found in association with mam tence systems, showing a general ev
cause of the scarcity of evidence, some moth kills-such sites might lend olutionary development (Nelken
controversial hypotheses have been credence to the model-is not only Terner and MacNeish, in press).
proposed to describe the event. explicable but inevitable, according
Among them is the "overkill" hy to Martin, owing to the thin distri The earliest stage, which is repre
pothesis of Paul S. Martin, most bution of hunters over a vast territory sented in the archaeological record by
thoroughly elucidated in an article in and the rapidity with which they a series of chipped-stone bifacial
Science in 1973 and its logistics re passed. hand-held choppers with sinuous
cently elaborated by means of com sharp edges, chipped cores, unspe
puter simulation by James E. Mosi Often, however, "invisibility" results cialized bifaces, and thick flake
mann and Martin in American Sci from the fact that the observer scrapers and spokeshavelike tools in
entist ("Simulating Overkill by doesn't know how to "see," where to association with a wide variety of
Paleoindians," 63:304-13). Briefly look, or how to understand what he is fauna and probably flora, may rep
stated, Martin's model proposes that looking at. In fact, early man was not resent the remains of peoples who
man, already a highly skilled hunter, quite "invisible" in the New World, were relatively unskilled hunters and
entered the New World in a single and the available archaeological evi gatherers and who possessed a tech
migration only about 12,000 years dence not only fails to support the nology that seems neither very spe
ago; a rapidly expanding population Martin hypothesis but tends to refute cialized nor well adapted for under
then moved swiftly southward, their it.About fiftyexcavated sites (see Fig. taking the food quest and dealing
highly specialized big game-hunting 1) have yielded eleven human skele with its by-products. The people of
subsistence patterns causing the ex tons, more than a thousand artifacts, the second stage were probably also
tinction about 10,000 years ago of the and three times that many bones of unskilled hunters and gatherers, but
resident fauna of large mammals extinct animals. From this evidence by this time the technology is better
such as mastodons, mammoths, we have obtained more than fifty ra adapted to these tasks and includes,
sloths, giant cats, horses, camels, etc. diocarbon determinations earlier besides the older types of imple
than 12,000 years before the present. ments, many specialized unifacial
In this paper I should like to review tools, including drills, spokeshaves,
the existing evidence for early man in end-scrapers, serrated tools (denti
Richard S. MacNeish isDirector of the Robert
S. Peabody Foundation He
North and South America, and to culates), and unifacial projectile
for Archaeology.
has done extensive work on prehistoric occu piece together some of the implica points. The people of Stage II also
pations and cultures in the Canadian arctic, tions from a different perspective. used bone tools, including perfora
the American Southwest and
Manitoba,
tors, scrapers, and projectile points,
Northeast, Kentucky, Illinois, Peru, and
In considering the evidence-which which were oftenmade by using stone
Mexico. Through his fieldwork inMexico at
Vera Cruz, Chiapas, and Puebla, ismeager at best and often very ten burins (slotting tools).
Tamaulipas,
Dr. MacNeish has provided most of the revo tative-it may be useful to divide
lutionary archaeological evidence for the long Paleoindian prehistory into four The people of the third and fourth
of Indian civiliza
general stages of development based stages were apparently more skilled
indigenous development
tions inMexico. His interdisciplinary studies
on tool assemblages (Fig. 2) and fau hunters, who used a series of rela
at Tehuacan, in particular, have given plant
specialists the materials for the continuing
nal remains. Essentially, the stages tively specialized tools both to bring
study of the prehistoric development ofmaize are developed from technological down the large mammals and to uti
and other Mexican is cur
features, for these are what an ar
domesticates. He lize the by-products of this game.
rently engaged in a similar study of the growth
and prehistoric in chaeologist most readily observes in Stage III sees the rise of the technique
of agriculture society
the artifacts and "ecofacts" he un ofmaking bifacial, laurel-leaf-shaped
highland Peru. Address: Robert S. Peabody
Foundation for Archaeology, Box 71, Andover, covers. Technological traits do reflect projectile points, often finely chipped,
MA 01810. human behavior, and themost clearly that may have been attached to lan
The earliest stage they were deposited during glacial Nuevo Leon, Mexico (Epstein 1969);
interstadials or during an ancient Tequixquiac, central Mexico (Avel
Let us begin with the earliest and glacial advance. eyra 1964); and Calico Hills, Califor
therefore the most tentative stage, nia (Simpson 1972). All these tools
which dates tomore than 20,000 years Underneath them are four strata of bear some resemblance to those of the
ago in South America and possibly to earlier glacial epochs which contained well-documented Paccaicasa phase of
more than 40,000 years ago inNorth artifacts ofwhat has been termed the Peru and seem to have been tools of
America. We may guess that migrat Paccaicasa phase, delineated on the the trade of similarly unspecialized
ing bands crossed the Bering Strait basis of about 80 artifacts found in hunters and gatherers of Stage I.
landbridge some 70,000 30,000 association with extinct sloth, horse, Exactly how old they are remains to
years ago and subsequently moved deer, giant cat, and other bones be seen.
Stage II
little evidence we have suggests that Garcia Cook 1970). UCLA radiocar
these people were technologically bon dates from all but the earliest
unsophisticated, making mainly zone, confirming the stratigraphy, While the evidence ismeager for the
bifacial tools by percussion. Perhaps were 14,700 1,400 B.P., 16,050 first stage, it is slightly better for the
they were also unskilled as hunters 1,200 B.P., and 19,600 300 B.P.; and second. There are many more dates
almost "collectors" of big game rather an Isotopes, Inc., date of 20,200 from South America ranging from
than hunters-like the people of the 1,000 on a bone from this earliest 12,000 to perhaps as much as 16,000
Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Eu dated stratum verifies the UCLA years ago, while dates from Central
rope and of the chopper-chopping calculation in a striking manner America range from 15,000 to 25,000
Site and location Date (yrsB.P.) and source Site and location Date (yrsB.P.) and source
Stage 1 :Stone choppers, cleavers, hammers, etc. Stage IV: Specialized bifacial projectile points, well-made scrapers and knives,
1. Pikimachay Cave (Paccaicasa 14,700 1,400-20,200 1,000 many other tools for new subsistence options
phase), Ayacucho, Peru (MacNeish, Nelken-Terner, 36. El Inga, Ecuador 9,030 144 (Bell 1965)
Garcia Cook 1970) 37. Los Toldos Cave, Patagonia before 8,750 -480 (Cardich,
2. Lewisville, Texas 37,000-40,000 (Crook and Harris (Argentina) Cardich, and Hajdak 1973)
1958) 38. Fell's Cave, Patagonia (Chile) 10,720-11,000 (Bird 1946)
3. Alice Boer, Rio Claro, Brazil undated (Beltrao 1974) 39. Pali Aike Cave, Patagonia (Chile) 8,369 400 (Bird 1946)
4. Fort Liard (Hughes complex), undated (Millar 1968) 40. Arica, Chile undated
N.W.T., Canada 41. Tequendama Cave, Bogota, 10,025-10,920 (Correal 1974)
5. Richmond Hill, British Honduras undated (Puleston 1974) Colombia
6. Frazer Canyon, Yale, B.C., Canada undated (Borden 1961) 42. Alice Boer, Rio Claro, Brazil 14,200 (Beltrao 1974)
7. San Isidro, Nuevo Leon, Mexico undated (Epstein 1969) 43. Lagoa Santa Cave, Brazil 9,720 (Hurt and Blasi 1969)
8. Tequixquiac, central Mexico undated (Aveleyra 1964) 44. Las Casitas, western Venezuela undated (Rouse and Cruxent 1963)
9. Calico Hills, California undated (Simpson 1972) 45. Tres Ventanas, central Peru 9,000-10,500 (Engel 1972)
46. Geuitarrero Cave, Peru 9,000-10,500 (Lynch and
Stage ll: Unifacial tools, burins, bone tools Kennedy 1970)
47. Pikimachay Cave (Puente 9,100-10,500(MacNeish,Nelken
10. Pikimachay Cave, Ayacucho, 14,150 180 (MacNeish, Nelken Terner, Garcia Cook 1970)
phase), Avacucho, Peru
Peru Terner, Garcia Cook 1970) 48. Inca Cave, Mendoza undated (Aguerre, Distel, Aschero
11. Los Toldos Cave, Patagonia 12,600 (Cardich, Cardich, Hajdak 1973; Schobinger 1969)
Argentina
(Argentina) 1973) 49. Cueva Negra, Cuenca, 10,010 430 (T. F. Lynch,
12. Valsequillo, Puebla, Mexico 21,850 (Caulapan)Orwin Ecuador pers. comm.)
Williams 1967) 50. Chivateros ll, Lima, Peru 10,400 (Lanning 1967)
13. El Bosque, Nicaragua 22,000* (A. Espinosa 1974) 51. Anafagosta, Chile undated
14. Tlapacoya, Valley of Mexico 23,150, 24,000 (Mirambell 1973) 52. Sambaqui, Brazil undated (Hurt 1974)
15. Tagua-Tagua, Chile 11,300 (Montane 1968) 53. Ajuereado, Tehuacan 9,000-12,000* (MacNeish,
16. Cueva de la Indies, San 10,500-13,100 (Gonzalez and Nelken-Terner, Johnson 1967)
Valley, Mexico
Raphael, Argentina Lagiglia 1973) 54. Valsequillo, Mexico 9,150 (Irwin-Williams, inpress)
17. Guitarrero Cave, Peru 12,560 (Lynch and Kennedy 1970) 55. San Juan del Rio, ca. 10,000* (MacNeish, Nelken
18. El Abra Cave, Bogota, Colombia 12,400 (Hurt et al. 1972) Terner, Johnson 1967)
Queretaro, Mexico
19. Meadocroft Rocksheiter, 13,250-15,120 (Adovasio 56. Lerma, Tamaulipas, Mexico 9,720 (MacNeish 1958)
Pennsylvania et al. 1975) 57. La Calzada, Nuevo Leon, 9,550 130-10,640 210
20. Old Crow, Yukon Terr., 25,750-29,100 (Irving amd Mexico (Epstein 1966)
Canada Harrington 1973) 58. Devil's Mouth, Texas 8,780 310 (Epstein 1966)
21. Dawson City, Yukon Terr., Canada before 39,000* (Harrington 1975) 59. Los Tapiales, Guatemala 10,710 (Gruhn 1973)
22. Santa Rosa Island, California 11,300-29,700 (Orr and Berger 1966) 60. Ventana Cave, Arizona 11,290 500 (Warren 1967)
23. Levi Rocksheiter, Texas before 12,830 175* (Alexander 61. Duchess Quarry, New York State 12,530 (Funk 1972)
1963) 62. Folsom, New Mexico 10,850 550 (Haynes 1965)
24. Fort Liard (McLeod complex), undated (Millar 1968) 63. Debert, Nova Scotia, 10,466 123-11,026 225
N.W.T., Canada Canada (MacDonald 1968)
64. Clovis, New Mexico 9,890 290-11,630 400
Stage III: Burins, blades, well-made end-scrapers, bifacial leaf-points (Haynes 1965)
65. Hell Gap, Colorado 8,600 600-13,060 600
25. Taima-Taima, Venezuela 11,860-14,400 (Bryan 1973) (Irwin 1970)
26. Muaco, Venezuela 9,030-16,375 (Bryan 1973) 66. Plainview, Texas 500 (Haynes 1965)
9,800
27. Cucuruchu, Venezuela undated (Cruxent 1970) 67. Brohm, Ontario, Canada ca. 9,000* (MacNeish 1959)
28. Huanta, Peru 10,400-14,150* (MacNeish, Nelken 68. Great Bear Lake, N.W.T., Canada ca. 9,000* (MacNeish 1964)
Terner, Garcia Cook 1970) 69. Modoc Rocksheiter, Illinois 10,051 650-11,200 800
29. Hueyatlaco (Valsequillo), before 11,000* (Irwin-Wi Ihams (Fowler 1959)
Puebla, Mexico 1967, inpress) 70. Hardaway, North Carolina before 9,000* (Coe 1964)
30. Coxcatlan Cave, Puebla, Mexico before 11,000* (MacNeish 1975) 71. San Dieguito, California 15,000-20,000* (Warren 1967;
31 Wilson Butte Cave, Idaho 14,500 (Gruhn 1965) E. L. Davis Pers. comm.)
32. McGee's Point, Utah 12,500-22,000* (Haynes 1969) 72. Danger Cave, Utah 8,970 150-11,453 600
33. Fort Liard (Klondike com undated (Millar 1968)
(Haynes 1965)
plex), N.W.T., Canada 73. Lind Coulee, Washington
34. Flint Creek-Bedwell complexes
10,800-13,000 (Daugherty 1962)
before 8,450 130 (H. L. 74. Healy Lake, Alaska 11,090 170 (Cook, 1970)
Yukon Terr, and Alaska Alexander, Jr., pers. comm.) 75. Onion Portage, Alaska before 9,857 155 (D. D.
35. Chivateros I, Lima, Peru before 10,400 (Lanning 1967) Anderson, pers. comm.)
*Not directly dated.
years, and the few dates from North increase very slight, and movements ing stone projectile points, denticu
America, from 25,000 to 40,000 years. in the New World extremely slow. lates, end-scrapers, spokeshaves,
The peoples of this stage could con Although no necessary connection is burins, and distinctive bone tools in
ceivably have come across on a land intended, in a general evolutionary cluding projectile points, as well as all
bridge from Asia or developed in way this stage might be roughly the earlier Paccaicasa types of
northern North America some 40,000 compared to the Mousterian of Eu scrapers and choppers. All of these
10,000 years ago. Fair but still in rope or the Ordos industry of China, tool types were found in association
adequate samples suggest that their ofMiddle Paleolithic times. with themany (302 identifiableand
technology emphasized stone flake 215 nonidentifiable) bones of extinct
tools fashioned by percussion and Much of the best evidence for the scelidotherium and megatherium
pressure, as well as the making and second stage comes from Latin sloths, horse (Equus andium), and
use of bone tools. Some of these new America. Again, the Pikimachay Cave camel, as well as with bones ofmod
concepts may have been introduced site at Ayacucho is of central impor ern animals.
by migrants from Asia, after which tance. Two well-defined strata above
older New World complexes may the Paccaicasa remains in the south These unifacial artifacts from Ay
have assimilated the traits to sup room pertain to this stage. The later acucho seem closely related to the
plement or replace their existing tool one, convincingly dated at 14,150 abundant materials, dated about
kit. The meager faunal and tool evi 180 years ago (MacNeish, Nelken 12,600 years ago (Cardich, Cardich,
dence seems to indicate a subsistence Terner, and Garcia Cook 1970), con and Hajdak 1973), from the lowest
based upon hunting of a relatively tained about 133 artifacts, while the levels of Los Toldos Cave inArgenti
unspecialized nature. Populations earlier zone had about 76. The tools nian Patagonia. Perhaps that date
seem to have been small, population are predominantly unifacial, includ represents the end point of the com
73-^HHHHH
66
67 Due to the fact that these well-exe
22 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^fc 63
69
after they had been begun, the arti
fact assemblage is neither well de
32- ^-
71
-W72 ^^^^^^^^K ^ ^^ I ^B ^r
19 fined nor well dated, but charcoal
wK I ^^ from Caulapan yielded a radiocarbon
determination of 21,850 years ago.
80
06
findings are our best repre
62-'-- These
I ^-- 23
sentatives of Stage II. A number of
'
other possible candidates all leave
56-:-9- much to be desired. For example, A.
Espinosa reported, in a speech at the
5=-^ 1974 Americanist Congress, finding
88
6
-^- 8 chipped stone unifacial implements
from a large fossil bed dated at about
--2^--69 22,000 years ago at the El Bosque site
44 -v
inNicaragua. Also, the Mexican site
27
25 -aaJMMk
?-Tili. of Tlapacoya has yielded C-14 dates
-^HHoH^Httb^ of 23,150 and 24,000 years ago, re
26-^^VH^^HHH^
ported to be in association with ex
18-;-JHHHH^L tinct animals, unifacial artifacts, and
49-^^H|^HHH|HHH^ a fine obsidian blade (Mirambell
36-^???^^??jjjjj^HHjjjj^A 1973). Unfortunately, the archaeolo
46-H^ffiWii^^nBf^MnKiii
17 --
i
gical contexts of these artifacts have
35-^HHHHHHHII^HHII^BK 10 not been adequately described, and
45
-"^IIHHHHHI^HHI^^Hi^^H^ the blade, a better trait of Stage III
so-?-^^^^^^HHH^^H^^^^^^^^^Hk than Stage II, was found in lake de
28-^BHI^HHHHHIII^^^I^HIIIHHi
47-^mB ^^^m lmm^S^m S ^m posits rather than in an occupation
?^ K^^^ Kj^^mHSj^^^m 43
context. Although the dates seem
about right for Stage II, both ar
Stage III
from 11,300 to 29,700 years ago (Orr have evolved from the still earlier
and Berger 1966), but their contexts New World complexes which I have
are such that one cannot accept them The third stage for the New World, termed Stage II. New World Stage III
with any degree of confidence. little better documented than the seems analogous to the early part of
second, is represented by complexes the Upper Paleolithic elsewhere-for
Some undated unifacial complexes in in the 11,000- to 15,000-year range in example, the Aurignacian and Solu
somewhat better context may also South America and Mesoamerica, trean of Europe and the Irkutsk
belong to Stage II, but, again, samples and there are hints that they are only Hospital industry of Siberia.
are small. These include three flake slightly older in North America
tools from Levi Rocksheiter inTexas, roughly 13,000 to 25,000 years old. Like much of the earliest evidence,
associated with extinct tapir bones The incomplete evidence from Latin our most numerous reliable materials
and under a layer dated at about America suggests that these peoples for Stage III come from Latin Amer
10,000 years ago (Alexander 1963); were specialized hunters of big game ica. Perhaps the most relevant are
the unifacial tools associated with or herd animals in a wide variety of from the Rio Pedregal area, east of
sabertooth tiger bones inFreisenhahn environments. Their technology Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela, where
Cave, also inTexas (Evans 1961); the seems considerably advanced over the abundant artifacts representing four
unifacial tools of the McLeod com previous stage, for they fashioned fine relatively well-defined complexes
plex from near Fort Liard, N.W.T. leaf-shaped bifacial projectile points Camare, Las Lagunas, El Jobo, and
(Millar, Ph.D. diss., 1968); and the as well as blades and produced skill Casitas-have been found on the
layer 4materials from the Alice Boer fully made flint burins, perhaps for surface of a series of four terraces
site in Brazil (Beltrao 1974). More making even better bone tools. Al (Rouse and Cruxent 1963). The Las
information is needed about each of though the sites of this stage have Lagunas and El Jobo complexes,
these assemblages. these diagnostic tools in common, which include leaf points and blades,
some Venezuelan assemblages are not in good archaeological con
A series of skeletal remains of typical suggest that future research may re text, and there is some question
American Indians, albeit slightly veal some regionally distinct com whether they are connected with our
primitive, that are difficult to classify plexes showing adaptation to specific Stage III. Fortunately, contextual
into my stage scheme might also be environmental conditions-perhaps data that have bearing upon the so
mentioned here. Among the most re the beginning of a development that lution of this problem are gradually
liably dated are Midland Man of becomes a fundamental characteristic coming to light (Cruxent 1970).
Texas and Marmes Man of Wash of Stage IV.
ington, with dates of about 13,000 Part of this contextual information
years ago, and Laguna Beach Man The new subsistence techniques, comes from three kill sites that have
and Los Angeles Man of California, ultimately derived from Asia, seem
dated at 17,150 1,470 (UCLA) and not to have noticeably diminished the
more than 23,600 (Berger et al. 1971), megafauna or led to remarkable in
respectively. J. L. Bada (1975), using creases in the human population, and Figure 2. The most important and plentiful
an amino acid dating technique, has the diffusion of the Stage III peoples remains of the Paleoindians are their tools,
reported dates of 70,000, 46,000, from the Bering Strait southward which may be categorized in four stages that
reflect evolving subsistence
45,000, 44,000, 39,000, and 28,000 seems to have been slower than a patterns. Diag
nostic artifacts for each group are illustrated
years ago for six other California snail's pace. It might be noted that here at one-half their actual size, except for
skeletons found near San Diego, while Stage III coincides with the time numbers 2 and 18-20, which are reduced to
Stalker (1969) estimates on the basis when ice is believed by many Ameri one-quarter actual size.
Hadleigh-West, F. 1967. The Donnelly Ridge site and -, A. Nelken-Terner, and A. Garcia Cook. 1970.
the definition of an early core and blade complex Second Annual Report of the Ayacucho Ar
in central Alaska. Am. Antiq. 32(3):360-82. chaeological-Botanical Project. Andover: Robert
S. Peabody Found, forArchaeol.
Harrington, C. R. 1975. A bone tool foundwith Ice Age
mammal remains near Dawson City, Yukon Ter -, A. Nelken-Terner, and I. Johnson. 1967. The
ritory.Arctic Circular 23(1). Ottawa. Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, Vol. 2: The
Non-Ceramic Artifacts, ed. D. S. Byers. Univ, of
Haynes, C. V. 1965. Carbon-14 dates and early men
Texas Press.
in the New World. Geochronological Laboratories,
Univ, of Arizona, Tucson. Martin, P. 1973. The discovery of America. Science
-. 179:969-74.
1969. The earliest Americans. Science 166:
' 709-15. McGee, W. J. 1889. An obsidian implement from
-. Pleistocene deposits inNevada. Am. Anthrop. 2:
1970. Geochronology ofman-mammoth sites
301-12.
and their bearing on the origin of the Llano com
plex. In Pleistocene and Recent Environments of Millar, J. F. V. Archaeology of Fisherman's Lake,
the Central Great Plains, ed. W. Dort, Jr., and J. N.W.T. Ph.D. diss., 1968,Univ, of Calgary, Alberta.