You are on page 1of 3

Sartreist absurdity and neocultural

Ludwig C. Abian

Department of Sociology, University of Illinois

L. Stefan Prinn

Department of Semiotics, Miskatonic University,

Arkham, Mass.

1. Expressions of stasis

The characteristic theme of the works of Tarantino is the common ground

between class and sexual identity. Therefore, Debord suggests the use of
capitalist subtextual theory to deconstruct and read class. Bataille uses the
term dialectic feminism to denote the role of the writer as reader.

If one examines neocultural narrative, one is faced with a choice: either

accept Sartreist absurdity or conclude that language has significance, but only
if sexuality is equal to language; if that is not the case, truth may be used
to oppress the Other. In a sense, Marx promotes the use of postsemantic
discourse to challenge hierarchy. Neocultural narrative holds that narrative
comes from the masses, given that Lacans model of Sartreist absurdity is

However, Lyotard uses the term neocultural narrative to denote a dialectic

whole. Porter[1] states that we have to choose between
dialectic feminism and subtextual deconstructive theory.

It could be said that in Reservoir Dogs, Tarantino analyses the

neocultural paradigm of consensus; in Jackie Brown, however, he denies
Sartreist absurdity. The subject is contextualised into a neocultural narrative
that includes reality as a paradox.

Thus, textual materialism suggests that culture is capable of truth. The

example of neocultural narrative intrinsic to Tarantinos Pulp Fiction
emerges again in Jackie Brown.

2. Sartreist absurdity and Lacanist obscurity

Class is part of the absurdity of consciousness, says Derrida. In a sense,
if neocultural narrative holds, we have to choose between Sartreist absurdity
and poststructuralist dialectic theory. Marx uses the term Lacanist obscurity
to denote the role of the artist as observer.

The main theme of la Tourniers[2] essay on neocultural

narrative is the bridge between society and class. Therefore, Marx suggests the
use of Sartreist absurdity to analyse narrativity. Baudrillard uses the term
Lacanist obscurity to denote a mythopoetical totality.

Class is intrinsically impossible, says Debord. But in Pulp

Fiction, Tarantino analyses subconstructive discourse; in Reservoir
Dogs he denies neocultural narrative. The primary theme of the works of
Tarantino is the role of the writer as participant.

The main theme of Prinns[3] critique of Sartreist

absurdity is the difference between truth and society. It could be said that
Werther[4] states that we have to choose between
postcultural narrative and the textual paradigm of expression. If neocultural
narrative holds, the works of Spelling are postmodern.

Therefore, the primary theme of the works of Spelling is the role of the
artist as poet. In Charmed, Spelling analyses neodialectic capitalism;
in Models, Inc., however, he denies neocultural narrative.

But the premise of conceptual desublimation holds that culture is used to

entrench colonialist perceptions of narrativity. Porter[5]
suggests that we have to choose between Lacanist obscurity and the
deconstructive paradigm of narrative.

Thus, an abundance of constructions concerning Marxist class may be

discovered. Lyotard uses the term neocultural narrative to denote a
subdialectic whole.

However, semiotic discourse implies that discourse is a product of

communication. If Sartreist absurdity holds, the works of Spelling are

But several materialisms concerning the common ground between society and
class exist. The subject is interpolated into a postcultural capitalist theory
that includes truth as a reality.

1. Porter, A. E. (1972)
Discourses of Rubicon: Sartreist absurdity in the works of Madonna.
Panic Button Books

2. la Tournier, S. ed. (1995) Debordist situation,

libertarianism and Sartreist absurdity. OReilly & Associates
3. Prinn, Y. W. V. (1979) Reading Baudrillard: Neocultural
narrative and Sartreist absurdity. Panic Button Books

4. Werther, K. ed. (1984) Neocultural narrative in the

works of Spelling. Schlangekraft

5. Porter, F. Q. F. (1970) The Circular Door: Sartreist

absurdity and neocultural narrative. Loompanics

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by
the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a
bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada
Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified
very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 16,886,268 essays since 25/Feb/2000
18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of

Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: On the Simulation of Postmodernism and
Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where
NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokals brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was
accepted by a cultural criticism publication.