Final Judgment in AgedDebt - Net Scheme

Uploaded by

George Sharp
325 views22 pages
Judgment against Shenae Osborn aka Shanney Osborn aka Shanney Gallegos, Michael Todd Osborn, aka Michael Ison aka Michael Osborn Ison aka Tom Furlong, and Virgil Williams for the AgedDebt.net scheme. Each defendant is jointly responsible for disgorgement of $438,016.82 in profits and each are ordered to pay a fine of $160,000. Good luck to the SEC in its collection efforts. How they avoided criminal prosecution is a mystery.

Original Title

Final Judgment in AgedDebt.net Scheme

Copyright

© © All Rights Reserved

Available Formats

PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Report this Document

Description:

Judgment against Shenae Osborn aka Shanney Osborn aka Shanney Gallegos, Michael Todd Osborn, aka Michael Ison aka Michael Osborn Ison aka Tom Furlong, and Virgil Williams for the AgedDebt.net scheme. Each defendant is jointly responsible for disgorgement of $438,016.82 in profits and each are ordered to pay a fine of $160,000. Good luck to the SEC in its collection efforts. How they avoided criminal prosecution is a mystery.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Flag for inappropriate content
325 views22 pages

Final Judgment in AgedDebt - Net Scheme

Original Title:

Final Judgment in AgedDebt.net Scheme

Uploaded by

George Sharp

Description:

Judgment against Shenae Osborn aka Shanney Osborn aka Shanney Gallegos, Michael Todd Osborn, aka Michael Ison aka Michael Osborn Ison aka Tom Furlong, and Virgil Williams for the AgedDebt.net scheme. Each defendant is jointly responsible for disgorgement of $438,016.82 in profits and each are ordered to pay a fine of $160,000. Good luck to the SEC in its collection efforts. How they avoided criminal prosecution is a mystery.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Flag for inappropriate content
of 22

Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 22

Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 2 of 22


Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 3 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 4 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 5 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 6 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 7 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 8 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 9 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 10 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 11 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 12 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 13 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 14 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 15 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 16 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 17 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 18 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 19 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 20 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 21 of 22
Case 1:17-cv-01756-AJN Document 50 Filed 08/21/17 Page 22 of 22

You might also like