Professional Documents
Culture Documents
521
522 The Musical Quarterly
* The term may be traced back to the Renaissance. Then it was used to desig-
nate the far-fetched arguments to which the syllogistic philosophers were prone. (See
Encyclopaedia Britannka, 1967 ed., I l l , 190.). Rousseau (and later the art critici
Ruskin and Burckhardt) pinned a "baroque" label on works of art that violated
classic canons of order and balance. The Frenchman's definition of a "baroque" mu-
sic contributed no little to the aversion in which the "baroque" period was long held:
"Une musique baroqut est celle dont l'harmonie eat confuse, charge de modulations
et dissonances, le chant dur et peu naturel, l'intonation difficile et le mouvement
contraint" {Dictionnairt de musique [1768], ed. M. M. Pathay, I [Paris, 1826], 67).
8
I am indebted for this and the following examples to Georg Weise, "La doppia
origine del concetto di manierismo," Studi Vasariani (Atti del Convegno inter-
nazionale per il quarto centenario della prima edizione delle "Vite" del Vasari [1950];
Florence, 1952), pp. 181ff.
6
To Leo X, 1519. See Julius von Schlosser, Die Kunstliteratur (Vienna, 1924),
pp. 175 and 177f. about the sources and authenticity of this letter.
7
He climaxes his famous philippic against Gothic style (Introduction to Vol. I
of his Vite, chap. I l l ) with the words "May God preserve every country from
such notions and modes of building! They appear so ill-proportioned when com-
pared with the beauty of our structures that they are not deserving of any further
discourse from us." Le Vite de' eccellenti pittori, scultori ed architettori (1550),
ed. G. Milanesi (Florence, 1878-1885), I, 138.
8
Cf. John Shearman, "Man\era as an Aesthetic Ideal," The Renaissance and
Mannerism (Acts of the Twentieth International Congress of the History of Art;
Princeton, 1963), II, 205.
524 The Musical Quarterly
from the preface to part I, p. 2. In writings of the 17th and 18th centuries, though,
the term was assigned various meanings ranging from a "manner" of performance
(e.g., Caccini's "nobile maniera di cantare") or a performance practice (Praetorius
refers to singing "uff jetzige Italienische Manier" in connection with Bovicelli and
Caccini) to the addition of embellishments to instrumental music (F. W. Marpurg
distinguishes between Setzmanitren and Spielmanieren, the first denoting written-out
"figures and passages," the second improvised ornaments). About these later usages,
see Hugo Riemann, Musiklexikon, 12th ed., Ill (1967), 543.
14
As a striking parallel to estrangement of this sort, one need only mention the
topography of the aristocratic household. In the Middle Ages the feudal lord built
his fortress in such a way as to encompass his tenant landowners. The Renaissance
noble chose for his palace a site in the midst of urban throngs. The new taste has it
that the dwelling be situated outside the city walls, away from humanity, in a rural
or silvan setting (Palazzo del Te, Pratolino, Villa d'Este). Nor was this enough; the
dwelling was further isolated by elaborately planned gardens which, in themselves,
stressed the contrast between the artificial order created by man and the natural dis-
order of his environment. Cf. Hauser, Mannerism, I, 283-84.
526 The Musical Quarterly
poets whetted their taste for the amorous and the pastoral; here they
evolved their subtleties of thought and expression. A few decades back,
the Florentine court and the urban populace had been entertained to
sounds of the sprightly frottola (or more accurately its Florentine count-
erpart, the canto carnascialesco); the same ditties sung within the walls
of the palazzo were repeated even more lustily on the streets. It is a sign
of the intervening class stratification that the madrigal became an exclu-
sive diversion of the courts, while the masses were forced to seek their
amusements elsewhere in the popular song, the villota, the canzone
villanesca.
The madrigal picked up its refinements via its poetry, a poetry as
tasteful and graceful as the highbred society for whom it was created. It
builds on a number of artifices which, in their way, presage the marin-
Madonna's presence, yet live from the hope of seeing her again; about
men who seek out the pleasures of love because they delight in wallowing
in its torments; about undaunted suitors who willingly suffer martyrdom
for her who only too willingly ordains their martyrdom; about their
more easily despairing confreres who, however much they try to escape
from love, become all the more entangled in its stratagems; about stem-
faced ladies who persist in their cruelty while deep down they crave
much the same thing as the objects of their cruelty.16 The conceits of the
madrigal work by way of antitheses. They unite "concepts" that are
mutually exclusive; they force a rationale on ideas which, when held up
to scrutiny, are irrational in their conjunction. Most characteristic of the
concetto, as the literary theorists would have it, is its sudden turn to the
unexpected, a turnabout in content that takes one by surprise. The pro-
ficial this courtly deportment was may be judged from Giovanni della
Casa's book called // Galateo (1558), an updated version of // COT-
tegiano.3* Its author draws up the social mores of a young gentiluomo,
briefing him on the virtues of a suppressed yawn, silent sneeze, the tone
of voice befitting address, the position of the arms during ambulation,
and like trivia. Between the calculated graces of our gentiluomo and that
deliberate floundering in circumstantial detail that hallmarks much of
the art and music of the Cinquecento there exists a not uncertain affinity.
Both issue from a frame of mind in which greater import is attributed to
superficies than to cogency of structure or statement the madrigalist
fastening on verbal characterization as an alternative for a binding larger
form, the poet grasping at an "exquisite, subtle, accomplished, highly
ornamented way of expression" out of the feeling that "language threat-
Alinari, Florence
The base of Cellini's Perseus group.
Loggia dei Lanzi, Florence
Alinari, Florence
Downloaded from mq.oxfordjournals.org at Hebrew University of Jerusalem on January 11, 2014
Of the two generating traditions the Northern was the more vital: the
forms and content of its sacred and secular music changed with changes
in times and aesthetic criteria. The dynamic growth of Northern art
comes as no surprise: its rich complex of styles and practices provides
from within the seeds of development. That it scaled heights of technical
achievement is evident from its many polyphonic intricacies.
The Italian tradition, by contrast, strikes one as rather sluggish of
character, given to reiteration of what has been consecrated by time and
usage. It failed to bring about anything that might be called a major
renovation of form and content, satisfying itself with minor changes here
and there, changes too sporadic and undeliberate to reform the ground-
work of its practice. Italian music could not provide from within itself
the stimulus for change; it could not claim, nor did it care to claim, the
In the fin de siicle eccentricities that crop up during the wane of the
14th century? What about the relationship of the madrigal to the later
Rococo, to the "vermanierten Mannheimer Gout" for which Leopold
Mozart reproached his son, to art nouveau, to Jugendstil? Are we deal-
ing here, perhaps, with a constant principle in Western arts? This last
question, touching as it does on the possibility of a unified historical un-
folding of mannerism what one literary critic has described as an
"academic tradition of the anti-academic" M intimates a most chal-
lenging line of further investigation. It is a question that must be an-
swered if the subject of mannerism in the madrigal is to be brought into
focus with the broad mainstream of musical as well as cultural history.