12 views

Uploaded by mzulfikarmuslim

- Image Segmentation using clustering (Texture with PCA)
- 2. Fuzzy Logic Algorithm for Unit Commitment Problem
- Lecture of AI- Module 10-2017.pdf
- Fuzzy Logic Example
- Inverse Laplace Transform Lecture-3
- Cambridge Paper IA1
- Fuzzy Paper
- 1208-2490-1-PB
- Dt 31811815
- 1303.0634
- Bonferroni Mean Operators of Linguistic Neutrosophic Numbers and Their Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Methods
- A NEW RANKING ON HEXAGONAL FUZZY NUMBERS
- Analyzing Specialized Views of Transportation Under Mean Safety By Using Fuzzy Inference Sysytem
- Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets
- Quiz3_QM2015_soln
- NFEM.Ch05
- Functions
- Fuzzy GA Economic Dispatch
- SpeIas
- sdarticle-1

You are on page 1of 7

r

selection of underground mining a

n

method s

a

by A. Karadogan*, A. Kahriman* and U. Ozer* c

t

i

o

Classical method evaluations generally produce n

a complex situation and take a long period of

Synopsis time. The decision-making process is made

harder by the question of many parameters

Decision making can be defined as the selection process of the best and the uncertain elements of underground P

routes from the alternatives in order to achieve a goal, and mostly mining method selection. New methods for a

involves uncertainty. Additionally, mostly qualitative variables

(weak rock, massive ore deposit, etc.) are in question. Mine

decision making processes have enabled p

planning engineers often use their intuition and experience in

decision-makers to decide more quickly, easily e

decision making. As fuzzy set theory has been used since 1970, and sensitively.

r

these uncertainties are easily evaluated in the decision-making

process. Real world study is decision making under vague Fuzzy set theory

constraints of different importance, involving uncertain data

(qualitative variables), where compromises between antagonistic Fuzzy logic is an appropriate methodology for

criteria are allowed. investigating a number of problems charac-

This paper presents a new approach in the selection of an

terized by unreliable data, imprecise measures,

underground mining method based on fuzzy set theory for the

Ciftalan Lignite Site located close to Istanbul in Turkey. The

ambiguous language and unclear decision

physical parameters such as geology and the geotechnical rules. Over nearly the past three decades,

properties of ore, hanging and foot wall, economic effects, environ- fuzzy logic has been advanced as a formal

mental effects, are established with field and laboratory tests means of handling the implicit imprecision in a

together with the determination of other qualitative variables. wide range of problems, e.g. in industrial

Meanwhile, some qualitative variables dealing with the matter was control, military operations, economics,

described according to the view of a number of experts. Then fuzzy

engineering, medicine, reliability, pattern

set theory is applied to these parameters, considering the available

underground methods in order to choose the proper method. At the

recognition and classification.5,6

end of the evaluations, the room and pillar method with filling was Mine planning engineers often use their

determined as the most suitable method for the test site. intuition and experience in decision making.

Keywords: Decision making, fuzzy set theory, underground, Decision makers, however, may not know how

mining, method selection to deal with quantative variables such as weak

rock or ore with massive dimensions. The

uncertainties in question can be easily

evaluated by applying fuzzy set theory in the

decision making process.7

Introduction A fuzzy set can be described as a value

Available deposits should be evaluated appointment that shows membership degree in

carefully in an optimum manner. In the the fuzzy set to whatever an existence in

process, the selection of the most appropriate pronunciation universe as mathematical.8 The

underground mining method is of great membership degree shows the adaptation

importance from the economic, technique, and degree to the properties that are described by

safety points of view. In the method selection

process, many controllable and uncontrollable

parameters should be taken into account.

Therefore, these parameters must be obtained

with scientific and technical studies for each

ore deposit.1,2

Up to now, research dealing with * Mining Engineering Department, Istanbul

University, Turkey.

underground mining method selection was

The Southern African Institute of Mining and

carried out by many scientists such as Metallurgy, 2008. SA ISSN 0038223X/3.00 +

Boskhov-Wright (1973), Hartman (1987), 0.00. Paper received Oct. 2006; revised paper

Laubscher (1981), Nicholas-Narek (1981).3,4 received Mar. 2007.

The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy VOLUME 108 REFEREED PAPER FEBRUARY 2008 73

SAIMM_feb_19-25:Template Journal 3/3/08 9:54 AM Page 74

the fuzzy set of this existence. There is not a exact definition The next step of fuzzy set theory is given in Figure 3. In

between elements of the fuzzy set and outside remaining of this Figure, hot fuzzy set membership degree gains cold

these elements. Thus, a fuzzy set can be described as fuzzy set membership identity at 0.5. The degree of the cold

concepts/objects having uncertain limits between them. fuzzy set membership increases when temperature decreases.

Namely, Fuzzy set theory is interested in fuzziness that According to this, temperature between 0 and 15C is

appears within these uncertain limits. Old people, high qualified as very cold and this part has cold fuzzy set entire

temperature and small numbers can be given as examples of membership. There is a gradual membership of cold fuzzy set

this fuzziness.9 for the temperature between 15C and 25C. It appears that

In classical set theory, an element is either a member of a there is an intersection of cold and hot fuzzy sets for the

set or not. There is no partial membership. This situation can temperature between 20C and 25C. Elements in this part

be explained with an example given in Figure 1. In this can be taken as members of either the hot or the cold fuzzy

example, the temperatures below 30C are not considered as set10.

hot. According to this, even 29.5C is not considered as hot. Although these examples are valid for the non-fuzzy

Therefore, there is no flexibility in this logic. inputs, sometimes inputs can be fuzzy in fuzzy logic. In this

In the real world, these limits are not as sharp as that.10 It situation, fuzzy set membership degree is determined from

is required that events should have a certain flexibility. The the area being covered between fuzzy set and fuzzy input

sharp limits of bilateral variables such as cold-hot, fast-slow, value. This situation is shown in Figure 4 and membership

high-low in classical sets is softened by fuzzy logic with the degree is about 0.3.

application of flexible characterizations such as little cold-

little hot, little high-little low. Figure 2 shows fuzzy set Fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making

theory that gives the value of variables such as temperature

close to the value observed in the real world. According to Decision-making is explained as a selection process of the

this, the membership degree of the hot fuzzy set is revealed best alternative from alternative sets in order to reach an aim

for the temperature values between 20C and 40C. The or aims. There are many methods of decision-making. The

membership degree decreases gradually from 1 at 30C to 0 focus of this paper is on Yager's method, which is one of the

at 20C. According to Figure 2, little-hot state will appear as methods of fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making. This

the temperature decreases. For example, 25C temperature is method is also based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process

qualified as little hot while 30C temperature is qualified as (AHP).11

very hot and 20C temperature is not qualified as hot. AHP, developed by Thomas Saaty (1988), has been used

Therefore, 20C temperature is not an element of the hot successfully in practice for the solutions of the various

fuzzy set.10 problems related to decision-making and planning. This

technique has also been used to solve the problems of

Figure 1Classical set theory

Figure 2Fuzzy set theory Figure 4Membership degree of the fuzzy input values

74 FEBRUARY 2008 VOLUME 108 REFEREED PAPER The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

SAIMM_feb_19-25:Template Journal 3/3/08 9:54 AM Page 75

T

decision-makers in different areas such as politics, defence, Table I r

town planning, communication and psychology. AHP is

Judgement scale determined by decision-maker a

based on the fact that problems can be solved more

effectively by dividing the problems into plausible and

Numerical scale Meanings n

smaller sub-parts. This process is formed by the following

1 Equally important s

3 Weakly more important

stages.12 a

5 Strongly more important

Clear description of the problem 7 Demonstrably more important

c

The determination of sub-aims t

9 Absolutely more important

The determination of the factors affecting sub aims

Analysis of the model results according to alternatives.

2, 4, 6 , 8 Compromise judgements i

The development by Saaty of a mathematical analysis of

o

pairwise comparisons of user responses has continued to n

exert a profound influence on computer applications designed procedure for obtaining a ratio scale for the elements

to enhance interactive human cognition. Saaty discovered compared14. To assess the importance the decision-maker

that if users are asked to measure the contribution of one or (w) is asked to judge the criteria in pairwise comparisons and P

more decision elements to two or more potential decisions, the values assigned are wij = 1/wij. Where i is the column

and if the decision element evaluations are entered pairwise number and j is the line number in m x m matrix. Having

a

in a two-dimensional matrix as they are obtained from the obtained the judgements, the m x m matrix B is constructed p

user, then the response matrix can be solved for its principal so that: (a) bii = 1; (b) bij = wij; (c) bji = bij14. To sum up, e

eigenvalue and for the eigenvector containing this principal Yager suggests that the resulting eigenvector should be used r

eigenvalue. These mathematical solutions yield direct to express the decision-makers empirical estimate of

estimates of data consistency within the response matrix, and importance. The reciprocal matrix in which the values are

a normalized estimate of the contribution of each decision given by the decision-maker for each criteria in the decision

element to each potential decision. The use of the eigenvector and criteria 1 and 2, respectively C1 and C2, are three times

method also preserves the ordinal rank of each of the as important as G, and the pairwise comparison reciprocal

decision elements when data within the response matrix are matrix is:

incomplete or inconsistent, a situation often encountered

during the selection evaluation of a system6.

The practical effect of such matrix cognition during the

selection evaluation is to record the users choices of

potential decisions for consideration, the users choices of

decision elements for analysis, and the users choices of

consultants for participation in the analysis. Each consultant

is then asked to estimate the quantitative contribution of

each decision element to each potential decision, and this Hence, the eigenvalues of the reciprocal matrix are =

estimate is then weighted by the calculated eigenvector [0, 3, 0] and therefore max = 3. All values except one are

obtained by solving the response matrix of each consultant. zero (as stated in Saaty14). The weights of the criteria are

Each consultants quantitative scaling of each potential finally achieved in the eigenvector of the matrix,

decision is then calculated, ranked in order, and combined

with the results of the other consultants to yield a consensus

best decision and ranking of alternative decisions6.

Formally, let A = A1, A2, ., An be the set of [4]

alternatives, C = C1, C2,.,Cm be the set of criteria, which

can be given as fuzzy sets in the space of alternatives, and G

the goal, which can also be given by a fuzzy set. Firstly, the The eigenvector corresponds to the weights to be

membership degrees of alternatives for each criterion are associated with the memberships of each

determined by expert views. attribute/feature/goal. Thus, the exponential weighting is

1=1/3, 2=2/3, 3=2/3 and the final decision (membership

Consider a simple example:

decision function) about the site location is given as follows:

G = [0.5/A1, 0.8/A2, 0.3/A3] [1]

D(A) = D(A) = min G(X), C1(X),

C1 = [0.7/A1, 0.9/A2, 0.5/A3] [2] [5]

C2(X),,CM(X)

C2 = [0.4/A1, 0.2/A2, 0.9/A3] [3]

There are some cases where the importance of criteria is

For the criterion weights to be determined, we used the not equally alike and weighting coefficients are required. The

judgement scale (Table I) determined by decision-maker. decision function with the relative importance of criteria,

Yager suggests the use of Saatys method for pairwise omitting the membership signal for simplification, is13:

comparison of the criteria (attributes). A pairwise comparison

of attributes (criteria) could improve and facilitate the [6]

assessment of criteria importance. Saaty developed a

The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy VOLUME 108 REFEREED PAPER FEBRUARY 2008 75

SAIMM_feb_19-25:Template Journal 3/3/08 9:54 AM Page 76

Thus, the fuzzy decision function in the example is proportion of the land above the coal seam was owned by the

D(A) = minG1/3, C12/3, C22/3 [7] company (approximately 2 217 000 m2). However, the rest of

the area was owned by the village people and village common

G = [0.5/A1, 0.8/A2, 0.3/A3]0.229 = [0.85/A1, 0.95/A2,

public property (approximately 172 000 m2). The company

0.76/A3]

could not extract the coal by open pit mining because of the

C1= [0.7/A1, 0.9/A2, 0.5/A3]0.688 = [0.78/A1, 0.93/A2,

fact that the village refused to sell these properties to the

0.62/A3]

company. This situation still continues. This leaves the

C2= [0.4/A1, 0.2/A2, 0.9/A3]0.688 = [0.53/A1, 0.33/A2,

company with no option but underground mining. However,

0.93/A3

The Kutman Company did not have any plans to extract the

D(A) = 0.53/A1, 0.33/A2, 0.62/A3 [8] coal by underground mining. The goal of this study is to

and the optimal solution, corresponding to the maximum select the most suitable underground mining method for this

membership 0.62, is A3 (D(A*) site with a new approach by applying fuzzy set theory.

D(A) = 0.62/A3). [9] In accordance with the main objective of this study, the

needed physical parameters such as geologic and

Case study geotechnical properties of ore, hanging- and footwall,

economic effects, environmental effects, which are

This study is based on the optimum underground mining

method selection for the iftalan lignite site located 35 km. established by field and laboratory tests, together with

north of Istanbul, Turkey. The location of the test site is uncertain variables, were determined. Meanwhile some

shown in Figure 5. uncertain variables dealing with the matter were described

Although all open pit mines operated at the sites according to the view of some experts. The generated

surrounding the iftalan lignite site had stopped their lignite parameters, which are needed for the method selection, are

production, the iftalan lignite site had stayed untouched and given briefly in Table II, together with related criterion.

no coal has ever been produced at this site. It was understood The optimum method was selected from among the

that the company had planned to extract the coal by open pit methods listed in Table III. These methods were defined as

mining despite the fact that the profitable coal seam lies more applicable methods for these conditions at the end of

under the iftalan village at a depth of 55 m. A major the preliminary election considering the expert comments.

76 FEBRUARY 2008 VOLUME 108 REFEREED PAPER The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

SAIMM_feb_19-25:Template Journal 3/3/08 9:54 AM Page 77

T

Table II r

Technical parameters determined as selection criterion a

Criterion Description n

Geometric shape of the lignite deposit Plate state (layered) s

Thickness of the lignite seam 2.3 m (average)

a

Seam inclination 5 (average)

Excavation dept 55 m (average)

c

Soundness degree of the lignite Low strength (compressive strength: 41 MPa) t

Contact state of the lignite seam-hanging and footwall Not clear i

Soundness degree of the hangingwall Hangingwall is marl-clay-sand. Low strength (compressive strength: 28 MPa) o

Soundness degree of the footwall Footwall is clay. Low strength (shear strength: 2.2 kg/cm2 )

n

Subsidence effect Seam is near to the surface (55 m) and hangingwall is low strength (compressive strength:

28 MPa). Therefore, there is a subsidence risk

Support necessity However, hangingwall and footwall became low strength, support is necessary

Nearness of the settlement areas There is a iftalan village over the lignite seam (55 m) P

Burning property of the lignite The lignite has burning property by itself and burning property is high. a

Hydraulic conditions There is the Black Sea at the north of lignite site (about 500 m) and there is a water problem.

p

Because elevation of the seam is about -10

e

r

Some of the qualitative results were produced from varied According to seam inclination, A5 is appropriate.

solution methods such as linear programming, expert According to the soundness degree of the hangingwall,

systems, expert views, etc. Each alternative (method) has A5 is more appropriate than other methods.

shown its advantages. In this case, it did not appear that an From the viewpoint of appropriateness, hydraulic

easy solution to the problem will be obtained. From the condition, A1 is the best method.

solution point of view, application of the fuzzy set theory The selection criteria are presented in Table IV and the

would be a proper choice and, therefore, used in this paper. optimum underground mining method selection procedure is

It was given some of the analysis that was determined by given below.

experts below: Let A = A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 be the set of alternative

According to dimension, A3 is the best method. systems and C = C1, C2, C3, , C18 be the set of criteria.

Seam thickness averages 2.3 m. Therefore, A3 is the The decision-maker is then asked to define the membership

best method. degree of each criterion that is conferred with experts on this

subject. Following that procedure the membership degree of

each criterion is given below in detail:

Table III C1 = 0.80/A1, 0.75/A2, 0.95/A3, 0.90/A4, 0.85/A5

Alternative underground mining methods C2 = 0.75/A1, 0.80/A2, 0.88/A3, 0.85/A4, 0.82/A5

A1 Longwall methods with filling (direction of inclination rising) C3 = 0.70/A1, 0.65/A2, 0.87/A3, 0.85/A4, 0.92/A5

A2 Longwall methods with filling (direction of inclination C4 = 0.70/A1, 0.75/A2, 0.90/A3, 0.80/A4, 0.65/A5

decline) C5 = 0.55/A1, 0.60/A2, 0.70/A3, 0.75/A4, 0.85/A5

A3 Longwall method with filling (progressed) C6 = 0.50/A1, 0.55/A2, 0.65/A3, 0.75/A4, 0.85/A5

A4 Longwall method with filling (returned)

C7 = 0.70/A1, 0.65/A2, 0.85/A3, 0.75/A4, 0.90/A5

A5 room and pillar method with filling

C8 = 0.40/A1, 0.50/A2, 0.70/A3, 0.80/A4, 1.00/A5

C9 = 0.65/A1, 0.75/A2, 0.85/A3, 0.60/A4, 0.95/A5

Table IV

Parameters taken into consideration for underground mining method selection

Criterion Selection parameters Criterion Selection parameters

C1 Geometric shape of the lignite deposit C10 Support necessity

C2 Thickness of the lignite seam C11 Nearness of the settlement areas

C3 Seam inclination C12 Burning property of the lignite

C4 Excavation dept C13 Methane existence

C5 Soundness degree of the lignite C14 Hydraulic conditions

C6 Contact state of the lignite seam-hanging and footwall C15 Mining cost

C7 Soundness degree of the hangingwall C16 Capital cost

C8 Soundness degree of the footwall C17 Production ratio

C9 Subsidence effect C18 Labour cost

The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy VOLUME 108 REFEREED PAPER FEBRUARY 2008 77

SAIMM_feb_19-25:Template Journal 3/3/08 9:54 AM Page 78

C10 = 0.60/A1, 0.55/A2, 0.85/A3, 0.65/A4, 0.80/A5 = 0.83/A1, 0.79/A2, 0.93/A3, 0.92/A4, 0.96/A5

C11 = 0.80/A1, 0.75/A2, 0.90/A3, 0.65/A4, 0.95/A5 C4 = 0.70/A1, 0.75/A2, 0.90/A3, 0.80/A4, 0.65/A50.1637

C12 = 0.78/A1, 0.70/A2, 0.90/A3, 0.75/A4, 0.65/A5 = 0.94/A1, 0.95/A2, 0.98/A3, 0.96/A4, 0.93/A5

C13 = 0.50/A1, 0.72/A2, 0.80/A3, 0.60/A4, 0.85/A5 C5 = 0.55/A1, 0.60/A2, 0.70/A3, 0.65/A4, 0.85/A50.3069

C14 = 0.85/A1, 0.45/A2, 0.75/A3, 0.60/A4, 0.50/A5 = 0.83/A1, 0.85/A2, 0.89/A3, 0.87/A4, 0.95/A5

C15 = 0.60/A1, 0.55/A2, 0.80/A3, 0.70/A4, 0.95/A5 C6 = 0.50/A1, 0.55/A2, 0.65/A3, 0.75/A4, 0.85/A50.1298

C16 = 0.60/A1, 0.55/A2, 0.80/A3, 0.65/A4, 0.90/A5 = 0.91/A1, 0.92/A2, 0.94/A3, 0.97/A4, 0.98/A5

C17 = 0.75/A1, 0.70/A2, 0.82/A3, 0.80/A4, 0.90/A5 C7 = 0.70/A1, 0.65/A2, 0.85/A3, 0.75/A4, 0.90/A50.2990

C18 = 0.65/A1, 0.70/A2, 0.80/A3, 0.75/A4, 0.60/A5 = 0.90/A1, 0.88/A2, 0.95/A3, 0.92/A4, 0.97/A5

C8 = 0.40/A1, 0.50/A2, 0.70/A3, 0.80/A4, 1.00/A50.2320

Additionally, the m x m matrix (Figure 6) was

= 0.81/A1, 0.85/A2, 0.92/A3, 0.97/A4, 1.00/A5

constructed to express the decision-makers empirical

C9 = 0.65/A1, 0.75/A2, 0.85/A3, 0.60/A4, 0.95/A50.0782

estimate of importance for each criterion. Then, the maximum

= 0.97/A1, 0.98/A2, 0.99/A3, 0.96/A4, 1.00/A5

eigenvector was obtained using Matlab.15 The judgement

C10 = 0.60/A1, 0.55/A2, 0.85/A3, 0.65/A4, 0.80/A50.0450

scale used here is: 1 equally important; 3 weakly more

= 0.97/A1, 0.97/A2, 0.99/A3, 0.98/A4, 0.99/A5

important; 5 strongly more important; 7 demonstrably more C11 = 0.80/A1, 0.75/A2, 0.90/A3, 0.65/A4, 0.95/A50.0430

important, 9 absolutely more important. = 0.99/A1, 0.99/A2, 0.99/A3, 0.98/A4, 1.00/A5

It turns out that the maximum eigenvalue of the C12 = 0.78/A1, 0.70/A2, 0.90/A3, 0.75/A4, 0.65/A50.0777

reciprocal matrix is = 21.3488. The weights of the criteria = 0.98/A1, 0.97/A2, 0.99/A3, 0.98/A4, 0.97/A5

are finally obtained in the eigenvector of the matrix. C13 = 0.50/A1, 0.72/A2, 0.80/A3, 0.60/A4, 0.85/A50.0313

Eigenvector = {0.3543, 0.4855, 0.5369, 0.1637, 0.3069, = 0.98/A1, 0.99/A2, 0.99/A3, 0.98/A4, 1.00/A5

0.1298, 0.2990, 0.2320, 0.0782, 0.0450, 0.0430, 0.0777, C14 = 0.85/A1, 0.45/A2, 0.75/A3, 0.60/A4, 0.50/A50.0288

0.0313, 0.0288, 0.1564, 0.1600, 0.0353, 0.0197} max = 1.00/A1, 0.98/A2, 0.99/A3, 0.99/A4, 0.98/A5

The eigenvector corresponds to the weights to be associated C15 = 0.60/A1, 0.55/A2, 0.80/A3, 0.70/A4, 0.95/A50.1564

with the memberships of each attribute/feature/goal. Thus, = 0.92/A1, 0.91/A2, 0.97/A3, 0.95/A4, 0.99/A5

the exponential weighting is 1 = 0.3543, 2 = 0.4855, 3 = C16 = 0.60/A1, 0.55/A2, 0.80/A3, 0.65/A4, 0.90/A50.1600

0.5369, 4 = 0.1637, 5 = 0.3069, 6 = 0.1298, 7 = 0.2990, = 0.92/A1, 0.91/A2, 0.96/A3, 0.93/A4, 0.98/A5

8 = 0.2320, 9 = 0.0782, 10 = 0.0450, 11 = 0.0430, 12 = C17 = 0.75/A1, 0.70/A2, 0.82/A3, 0.80/A4, 0.90/A50.0353

0.0777, 13 = 0.0313, 14 = 0.0288, 15 = 0.1564, 16 = = 0.99/A1, 0.99/A2, 0.99/A3, 0.99/A4, 1.00/A5

0.1600, 17 = 0.0353, 18 = 0.0197 and the final decision is C18 = 0.65/A1, 0.70/A2, 0.80/A3, 0.75/A4, 0.60/A50.0197

obtained as follows: = 0.99/A1, 0.99/A2, 1.00/A3, 0.99/A4, 0.99/A5

C1 = 0.80/A1, 0.75/A2, 0.95/A3, 0.90/A4, 0.85/A50.3543 D(A) = min0.81/A1, 0.79/A2, 0.89/A3,

= 0.92/A1, 0.90/A2, 0.98/A3, 0.96/A4, 0.94/A5 0.87/A4,0.92/A5

C2 = 0.75/A1, 0.80/A2, 0.88/A3, 0.82/A4, 0.85/A50.4855 and the optimal solution, corresponding to the maximum

= 0.87/A1, 0.90/A2, 0.94/A3, 0.91/A4, 0.92/A5 membership 0.92, is A5 (D(A*)

C3 = 0.70/A1, 0.65/A2, 0.87/A3, 0.85/A4, 0.92/A50.5369 D(A*) = 0.92/A5

78 FEBRUARY 2008 VOLUME 108 REFEREED PAPER The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

SAIMM_feb_19-25:Template Journal 3/3/08 9:54 AM Page 79

T

At the end of the evaluations, the room and pillar method References r

with filling (A5) was determined to be the most suitable

1. KAHRIMAN, A., CEYLANOLU, A., DEMIRCI, A., ARPAZ, E., and UYSAL, a

method with 0.92 membership degree as an optimum

underground mining method for the iftalan lignite Site.

. Optimum underground mining method selection for Kayseri-Pulpinar n

Chrome Mine, Mining Review, TMMOB Chamber of The Mining Engineers,

Other methods with lower membership degrees than A5 have Ankara, 1994. pp. 2741. s

lowered the chosen probability. 2. DEMIRCI, A., CEYLANOLU, A., and KAHRIMAN, A. Determination of optimum a

underground mining method at Aegean Metal Eskiehir Chrome

To reach the result of this study, we benefited from expert c

Enterprise and Projected Studies, Final Report, Cumhuriyet Universiy,

views through a questionnaire to determine the alternative Sivas, 1995. t

methods and criteria weights. When experts were asked for 3. NICHOLAS, D.E. Selection variables, Mining Engineering Handbook, vol. 2,

1993. pp. 20512057.

i

the optimum method for application to this site, most of

experts suggested the room and pillar method with filling. 4. HAMRIN, H. Choosing an underground mining method, Techniques in o

Underground Mining, Society of Mining Metallurgy and Exploration Inc.,

Littleton, CO, USA, 1998. pp. 4585.

n

Conclusions 5. BASCETIN, A. A decision support system using analytical hierarchy process

(AHP) for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open pit mine,

The development of computer technology and programming Environmental Geology, vol. 52, no. 4, April, 2007, pp. 663672.

of colloquial language with expert systems has considerably 6. BASCETIN, A., ZTA, A., and KANL, A. EQS: A Computer Software Using P

reduced the decision-makers burden. With regard to classic Fuzzy Logic for Equipment Selection in Mining Engineering, The Journal a

of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM),

methods, decision-making with fuzzy set theory enabled one p

vol. 106. no. 1, January, 2006.

to reach the aim in a quicker, easier, and more sensitive way. 7. BAETIN, A. An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in e

This paper has discussed decision-making in a fuzzy Equipment Selection at Orhaneli Open Pit Coal Mine. Transactions of the

Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM), Section A-Mining r

environment (uncertain qualitative data variables involved in

Technology. vol. 113, no. 3, September, 2004.

the systems) for solving multiple attribute problems of

8. ZADEH, L.A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to

optimum underground mining method selection. Since the approximate reasoning, Part 1, Information Science, vol. 813, 1975.

focus is on fuzzy multiple attribute problems, a detailed pp. 199249.

discussion of the most important methods for solving these 9. GOKAY, M.K. Used of the fuzzy logic approach on rock mass classification,

Mining Review, TMMOB Chamber of The Mining Engineers, Ankara,

problems was presented. 1998. pp. 311.

At the end of the evaluations, the room and pillar method 10. KARADOGAN, A., BASCETIN, A., KAHRIMAN, A., and GORGUN, S. A new

with filling (A5) was determined to be the most suitable approach in selection of underground mining method, Int. Conf. Modern

underground mining method for the iftalan lignite site. Management Mine Producing Geol. Env. Protection, Varna, Bulgaria,

June 39, 2001. pp. 171183.

Results of this study used to determine underground mining

11. BASCETIN, A. and KESIMAL, A. Fuzzy logic application in mining,

method selection with fuzzy set theory will show the way to Engineering Facultys Earth Sciences Review, vol. 12, no. 1, 1999.

the most appropriate method selection studies at other mines. 12. ALBAYRAK, C. and ALBAYRAK, E. Selection of rigth associate on strategical

cooperation: suggestion a decision support model, 1th National

Production Researchs Sym., Istanbul, 1997. pp. 1922.

Acknowledgement

13. YAGER, R.R. A new methodology for ordinal multi objective decisions

This work was supported by the Research Fund of Istanbul based on fuzzy sets, Decision Sci. 12, 1981. pp. 589600.

14. SAATY, T.L. Exploring the interface between hierarchies, multiple

University (Project number is T-832/07032000). The authors

objectives and fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 1978. pp. 5768.

are grateful to the Executive Secretariat of Scientific Research 15. Matlab, The Mathworks, Inc., version 5.0.0.4069, copyright

Projects of Istanbul University for their financial support. 19841996.

The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy VOLUME 108 REFEREED PAPER FEBRUARY 2008 79

- Image Segmentation using clustering (Texture with PCA)Uploaded byP Prakash Prakash
- 2. Fuzzy Logic Algorithm for Unit Commitment ProblemUploaded byPravin Sonwane
- Lecture of AI- Module 10-2017.pdfUploaded bymsalehtdc2
- Fuzzy Logic ExampleUploaded byThilina Weliwita
- Inverse Laplace Transform Lecture-3Uploaded bySingappuli
- Cambridge Paper IA1Uploaded byChristopher Hitchens
- Fuzzy PaperUploaded bymukesh311aa
- 1208-2490-1-PBUploaded byArte Zaragoza
- Dt 31811815Uploaded byAnonymous 7VPPkWS8O
- 1303.0634Uploaded byss_barpanda8473
- Bonferroni Mean Operators of Linguistic Neutrosophic Numbers and Their Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making MethodsUploaded byMia Amalia
- A NEW RANKING ON HEXAGONAL FUZZY NUMBERSUploaded byijflsjournal
- Analyzing Specialized Views of Transportation Under Mean Safety By Using Fuzzy Inference SysytemUploaded byAnonymous 7VPPkWS8O
- Single Valued Neutrosophic SetsUploaded byIlieCraciun
- Quiz3_QM2015_solnUploaded byMena Awan
- NFEM.Ch05Uploaded byShubhankar Bhowmick
- FunctionsUploaded byAtiqah Abd Rahim
- Fuzzy GA Economic DispatchUploaded byGiovanni Eliezer
- SpeIasUploaded bysfofoby
- sdarticle-1Uploaded byGodwin Anand
- Jan 14 SlidesUploaded bygheorghe gardu
- sun8Uploaded byshanmugapriyaarulsek
- Base Isolationreport Asasas25022017Uploaded byJody Setiawan
- 34434Uploaded bydeepak_gupta_priti
- Restrepo 2007 ApproximatingUploaded bypastafarianboy
- LSW With PolymerUploaded bytsanshine
- Implementation of One Dimensional Fem ElementsUploaded byRobert Vochescu
- 02 - Logica difusa.pptxUploaded byJames Saavedra Castillo
- NEUTROSOPHIC REFINED SIMILARITY MEASURE BASED ON TANGENT FUNCTION AND ITS APPLICATION TO MULTI ATTRIBUTE DECESION MAKINGUploaded byMia Amalia
- Oo Imple Fuzzy Inference EngineUploaded bytulkas72

- Unplanned Dilution and Ore Loss Prediction in Longhole Stoping Mines via Multiple Regression and Artificial Neural Network AnalysesUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- Very Low Frequency TechnologyUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- Water-treatment Practice in South African Gold MinesUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- v104n11p617Uploaded byKatta Sridhar
- What is the Best Energy-Delivery System for Hand-held Stope Drilling and Associated Equipment in Narrow-reef Hard Rock MinesUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- A Perspective on Underground Support Technologies InUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- Early Start and Late Start Algorithms to Improve the Solution Time for Long-term Underground Mine Production SchedulingUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- 07Uploaded bybenjamin
- Large-scale Deformation in Underground Hard-rock MinesUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- Critical Investigation Into the Problems Surrounding Pillar Holing OperationsUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- A Model to Predict the Performance of Roadheaders Based on the Rock Mass Brittleness IndexUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- A Decision Analysis Guideline for Underground Bulk Air Heat Exchanger Design SpecificationsUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- A New Underground Auger Mining SystemUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- Hydraulic Rock Drills and Their Effect on the Underground EnvironmentUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- Air Leakage Through Underground Ventilation Stoppings and in Situ Assessment of Air Leakage Characteristics of Remote Filled Cement Concrete Plug by Tracer Gas TechniqueUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- A Risk Evaluation Model for Support Design in Bushveld Complex Underground Mines Part II–Model Validation and Case StudiesUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- Can Buffer Stores Improve ProductivityUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- An Investigation Into the Optimization of Personnel Transportation to Level 15 and Below at Khuseleka No. 1 Shaft, Anglo PlatinumUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- A Comparative Study Between Shuttle Cars and Battery HaulersUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- Cooling Power of Underground EnvironmentsUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- Underground Gold Mine Grade ControlUploaded byquercus0
- Fighting Mine Fires Using Gases With Particular Reference to NitrogenUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- Control Strategies for Coal Dust and Methane Explosions in Underground Coal Mines Current South African Research and Development InitiativesUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- An analogue system for the early detection of fires in gold minesUploaded byd0153030
- A Critical Evaluation of the Water Reticulation System at Vlaklaagte Shaft, Goedehoop CollieryUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- A Case Study on Stoping Shift Buffering at Impala Platinum a Critical Chain Project Management PerspectiveUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim
- Colorado School of Mines IntroductionUploaded bymzulfikarmuslim

- LS-LSIT Video Exam Preparation Course WorkbookUploaded byChris Szychowski
- Service BlueprintingUploaded byliza nayak
- Audit of HospitalUploaded byKunal Kapoor
- Plant Kingdom Previous Year Questions_ezyexamsolution.comUploaded byNavas ev
- Kipdf.com Event Space Rental Agreement and Contract 5aab99851723ddbd6a79429b (1)Uploaded byMary Ann Farcon Velasco
- 8157-6M_HummingbirdBasicLanguageProgrammersGuideUploaded byJay Lee
- Best Glide Speed and DistanceUploaded byLikeKangen LoveWater
- datasheet f1010Uploaded byshobu21
- 01-07 Seamless MPLS ConfigurationUploaded byMeklati Youness
- 2018 Digital Video Viewers and Brand Connection FinalUploaded byagnihoon
- Full Thrust RemixedUploaded byTeknoMerk
- Essential Heavy Metal Guitar Scales and ModesUploaded byTirta Budiawan
- Stack StoriesUploaded by0zzie
- chapter2.pdfUploaded byvka_prince
- 18. Connectors r1Uploaded byCarlos Eduardo Mora Cifuentes
- 723 Conduct TrainingUploaded byWanda
- manual de partes cargador 908Uploaded byDavid Gallardo Guerra
- billRodgers1974LOGUploaded bybobing4barker
- Essential OilsUploaded bysanazh
- AllUploaded byRavi Kumar
- NDT for Gas TurbinesUploaded bysami
- EPBMUploaded bySandip Sarkar
- koike ik12 beetlepartsmapUploaded byRoxy Sinead Vigo Lau
- LG EnV2 for Verizon WirelessUploaded byWirefly
- 15+Jeppesen+Marine+Contribution+to+e-Navigation+Stεle+Hψylandsskjζr+Jeppesen+Marine (1)Uploaded byNikolas Kalyvas
- 25Uploaded bymarya_mar
- 3. Analyze and Save a SignalUploaded byniggy.fan
- Corrine Brown Letter to Holder Re Trayvon Martin With AttachmentsUploaded byThe Conservative Treehouse
- DOAS Supply Air ConditionsUploaded bymefaisal75
- New Microsoft Office Word DocumentUploaded byJeevan Landge Patil