You are on page 1of 14
6 THE STILL PoinT embodiment and uence Ashe sil pong ofthe Neth rom nor tow Bat neither cet nor movement. Aad do nels, ‘Where past and fue ae gathered. Nekher movesent fom nor towards, cep forthe poi the stl pine, ‘There would be no dance, thr ion the dance, ‘TS. Elo, The For Quartets I aay hl res th he word era alo quicly eure p= ory. ingreving of ry the seveneemk corey Seni wor nigel by ee Mires, 98) On te ar had Soyo mrad lage cal may om nation fide al gry spol resune™~wich nad sete pila the dime tt tealinay even (os 98821)" "Ths kod of thiking shat ai Sol romani foe ino the di parol cs {Boonie ‘ths end, caw In acempting onset spf Wake Bejan ee ‘wong worl, Nhe flesh nor ese, gatthestl pain cherie ance "On the one had ‘of «politics of ‘overeucning, question. (Hil 1975: 14} whch strech all dy fs old ened psi down’ to the ewes es at of Beauty” (MER, 1996 0 qual preity cone op mck of he whch ide eaivay™ wo culal “produc tothe kindof errs thas end ‘rasing your er on Sunday i ng abou restance with cs implicit David versus as oe very dint disadvantage everything hare tomy of esstance or submission andl of the hich anno be undesod in this way rman hidden 1 were conser estan in teres fundamen ston hare en mach infor by he Michel de Conn T wort fas Ld Sep ee Bet raced ere er ey eaeelSiny Serres Mostained but not defined by dominant social orders. Yet, ultimately, both eben ett ham pec nn re Nees ees pee ere er ee ee ee ee ee eo er ee Sos rere nie fetes na ced fare Sean tS ee Sees a ee ers ae rae cee eee ere One =e ‘We mos finaly face p to theak of any pre-esalished orders in the oa) (Shoe, 1993: 25) Tas beg 280% something remarkable has hag terbqunuteplacntr wy Sr apn or hy ‘he poral it T call on-represcatational theory or the ther Err Ssh tr cn ud ating ty vfs) aa aal sciences and humanities for example in philoso, Depa ay ann rete aa oko eel cr tig Oc Bing ke wod ce mettn se mush renown Thy "oY Gili iar ete St ea ptm ‘usr ll bat nie wether i dene THR tee inlet tem tha pare wha ce mani SERENE Scot in providing ach guise, th Eiticounes eplntion and knowles cone eo eee covery of how the wold "rely" iyisreprsension bee the shine akth comin of nage it aloan a TR atc of hte go Sade sean contre wih propsiontad dana het eo ings our way ofloking at things by "moving eae hE 2 97 king neh pyr ht amend ctl lig eMac pmo omen tes mers thes wees de uy lec nae ‘iter tery sly Pan ma ine 8:9 ait senting psa ew tnd a patne fans my yb op tiny ame OF rn psy pea fm he ia ide ‘What, then is non repre exe PO rpesnttinl theory? We can summarise it min | Non-rprsemtions | sep ml eheory is about pracics, mundane everyday __—_ poctces, that shape the conduct of human beings towards others and Fpcmsche in parca sns/The domain of inventguion iste dnorbed ‘fl eopingo thx practic nd the concer i heefore — ot x0 much .. with wt ssig che supposedly true nature of what omehing i entempltvely, se with stemptng to tial bow moment by moment, we aft conduct ot practi everydy allie omehing we wally lave urackoowladge in the background to courte (Sbose, 996-2) A opresn and eng, Showing anna? of) [Tiziano then, project concerned wiih. the pevformatvepeniaton? \ ery Ci, 1960. 2 Now-epresetnional theory i concerned with the paces af sub Jesifeaion (aoe the ere “on, not wi the sbjos. A numberof Ssequenes follow. Fir, the subject aly deenred. Human Being thoupeok a 4 kindof machnaion, a hybrid of fs, knowledge pasion, and fecnigu. One af the character of esr of teal i ayo lectin apn an acing al Ur ern cee and ancnlge to tre of tied persona to Be ‘ere, dacoered or worked nn acs mctnron of tes = thee cody form the hvion ofthe ike Bet hs achnson ede to be reaped at psi gino sipieston of rset ig ose, 1964 144) Inflows tac suchan approach egies ‘only «minimal, wesk oe thin eoegpion of human materi on which history writs. the humsn being here ata enty with sony, burthe tage ofa multiply of types of work, morelike a tad or a longiade at which diferent vcore of diferent spate inten The { “ntersoriy’ which so many fel compelled o diagnose is not ha of psychologial system, but of + dacontinious sirlas, Kind of Inflding exerioty (oss, 19864 1427 ‘But, second the abet i sl embodied. This means much more than the actual shape and inate capaci ofthe ban ody Tess involves ase ener sl and carl silt. Meden-Ponty (192. 14) makes ib Slnincon clear "The body our general medium for having a word. Sometimes itis restiaed to scons secrsry for the conservation of if, and ‘cordingly i pois sound wr Kooga! won at eter tine, | ‘laborating upon these pri running Primary ston and running fom thee Somerton, seein fit of motor habits [sic] such as dance” Sapna he man ined canoe hea bets nt ncn ma fh he ‘Projects thereby around itself « cultural woeld. a ‘Ac allembodinent is ctl inv bay in other word, sundentoed i ne an active rip onthe wor tems af wht an do (Gron19RN ptin edges Melen-Pont cr Bulbuingwiehthsyes—tstng imalingendece hore Keg Theta duam nsocgven orn eee tod the ough he sek and he cy the nl se vento movemers ofthe hand hat ppt oe Pra acing, perialy, across seen aoe nn atemed ways ich movements modeacd ons ooking tnd hey ae (Ling 19:7 cing Meens- Ponty, 19623179 "Ths eve an activity ike studying, innocent in is uni Guy sl bein for some ough handing too" Cag Taos fe \ Same and Mal, 16) Thr hea ease tes a8 Smeg incidental or nimi to nbjctaion Whe ee becoming bj ge tha ee aged sa wie snl, an absence da inlnporbi ete es ‘eins a ae poychouysiseet ona nation of dase sitet ob le hough tes inden. hat rcs a machine alliances wend of ign posing ito the vented feats [phe si oohingaboveis own rleraion orate Xcasemble things ou sagas sa ecg down ino hei snglrties enor toe nae Mme (Gros, 194:165) Sanit aBs bles ened in mb ton dsl practices, hat 2% imelisealy, we pay mos tenon to thse kin of avy in —_ which we suppose peopl to know what hey are dong in-which hey shane aire nein eee es ae a are SELENE ed ares eg TESS ns deo ghee is iota the light of day, bu because the formative influences shaping ce ree oe Soaly dary ow ii ke ei wie ee (thc Sn ee mc pra ee es Taroom aaa rae ee ee ear ntsc dean en ele SE re ee oe eee not ankaowledgebl) kind of acti. ining hugo hid tay. Jone ction has a number of impor fears. To bein with ie Jicdncndedcomsoqcnce, Cat is us consequences which are Hot tended by ty ofthe paripans nan interaction But ae oot utc ‘Theo acon bas entonaliy, tht yt any ene moment he ome pope const wen Ron hae 2 cing pass uh ony ean fer 2a wi hsb prop, we th be eed teand wil be gored or even sctioed Unfting rnappropiate and wl Bei nance ine on ein ain aay a naive rtore-pont fom, di ‘Rp, Sar geno Tat ora characte which dre on diferent krwleges which do ea ae Tnsen atarert bs cornet make Scot dng be oa tcl eveything ses fine pepe pitas. Eo ease ee se ne pti ens eer ret oes auing 2 maximum gap on the world” (Dreyfs, 19%: 10). Send (Grossberg, 1992) Third, boas space thesore ramets into si of| toners whichenoruntes we rodeo In other word, at an isanc of che joint ction Berween ther, people find themselves ina seeing ven sition an organised son ‘hae har ‘horizon’ eo abd ie ope to tei acon, Indeed ‘orgniantion such thatthe contin (and emblem) ie makes ‘valle inlonce tha ist sy, invite” oe “inhibit, peopl’ next pombe sctione (Shower, 1995:47) AAs eeu geography “wrens hicry from itself in order to discover ‘comings tha donot belong t0 history even if they all back ino fe (Ddleuzeand Gusta 1994590)" (9) Now-epresemational theory is concerned with technologies of beng, “hybrid atembages of knowledges instrument; persons eyes of jg men ulin and spaces underpianed at the programmatic evelby centin resuppostion about, and objetves for, human being” (N. Ree, 16a 132) Sach an approach ass complex genealogy, bot fight Be suggested that thre major example can curren be found "The it ofthese he ‘ecalogil approach of Foacal, Foca tempted vo prove» number {oF egional’ examples of tchnoogier which ale moder lf big human ther objec One, the dicpinary technology operates in erm os dead structuring of space, ie and reasons amonga avis, through proce Aare of hierarchical observation and normal jodgement, nd throagh tempo fold shee agement int the procedures and judgemens which ‘ch nid! wes to order their own conduct Another the pao ‘echooogy attempts bul ‘lain of pial pidance beimeen sn authority and cach member of Sei eck being ch leo ad close, exemplary. an dipship enfolded int the person eet way of eae of al vee ere ol Aisne, elfdciphrmon sod slurry Like dip ths pastoral echnslogy cpa of tation i» range of cet forms nthe ration of rie and prihinc be pa ed patent socal werk and cen and nthe elton ote edad sje to me (N Rose, 196 152) A second ctampe isso sctornetwork theory (which in sme of its version owes a deh to Foal). Acorneework tory an atempt 10 ‘Produce an scout oftchnolopes of sng whch more perforate an tht provided by Fone The work ld plored, embedded and represented in mater tha ar only pany soa Th onder stot thn ake plc sing thse mater produce more os age neworks that remove or fan scl scoring to hr byt aml he ees et teases ed ic atc ar tee et thes endless strug In prsiesla,actornetwook theory provides hee ferences rom te Foucallian ode. Tit gives mch greater rleto fon human agency Homan and non-human agents ae ssocted with one nother in erworks and evolve topether wh these networks Actor rework theory is therefore syeumtealwid respect o human and non Iman agency Second, gives eater emphasis 0 contingency, 4 mode of understanding is always limited, Ie sometimes generates Prous pool of eppaens order. Certny i does’ old che world Inthe pp of toning hegemony: Bue hs i righ then there age auenion that Foural tends ta efuse, Though cher ae exepion in fis work ~as for isance in the opening chaps of The Order of ‘Things moet ten he avoids esplanng the ways in which discourses ‘rmodet of ordering interac sche are aval tld, erormed apd ‘embodied in the networks ofthe soci But my argument is tha ‘queions of changes inthe moe of eering, onthe one hand a tha imteacon onthe other, ae closely relate. Agents, dessions machines, organiations and ther envionment speech, ation, texts want ro sy thot all of thee change Beetae they are recursive ingerordng or terdncrsive elas Tey all da, ell, embody oF perorma network of muliply-ordringrelions- (haw 19:22) In other word, as Law (199: 2) psi ‘psstracralism mes symbolic incr? Third actor network theory providers mach more central ole {espace han normaly found in Foacal accounts (Law 19%: 102) Space ie ot jst at of dillerene compatible o incompatible orders. In actor network tory, pace constructed by networks pce is costantly made ‘noble durable ad rode toot dhe agumon spl. Ista some materials bee than ‘er And sme travel hee than other Voes dn’ It fr log, fd they don’ tel very far soil ordering depended on voices lone i would be» very loal fac Bes travel beer than vices fd they tend lat ver: Bu they can only each 3 fa ad once they are out of your ight you canbe sre hat they will do wha you have told them So soc crdering tht res ypon the soma Hable to be small in scope and ited in soccer Text lo have thee ‘rawbacks, They an be brbed, lx, rninerpeted. On the othe hand he tn 0 eravel well nd they Lt well they aze properly looked ater So texts may have ordering effects ha spread seroas the timeand space And other materials may have sir tects. The Palas ‘de Verses hs lasted wll nd machines, though they vary, may be Ino and ast for longer thon peopl "This them ithe simple wy of puting The agumen is tht arge- scale atiempes a ondeig or dvaciton depend onthe cretion of ‘nhac Brun Latur cl “inmucabe mob’ materials tht can ay {ecard abou wend oretai hel shape But opt iia i wy Soo simple sounds at Tam saying chat mobility and dra = nei -aretemelves lation eects Concrete walle ae sold hil they are maintained snd puto Tee order oly if ey ae tot destroyed enroute sd heres someone athe ther end who wl ead them and order thir conduct accordingly. Buildings may be ‘Moped or ther wes for nance, a abject of che tour ase So {nate san eller. And ies durable o there a3 foetion of Inebeaton nthe nonwork ofthe sci (ae, 1994 102) A thie example i provided by the work of Deleze and Guat For Deleuze and Gusta, the world made up of asemblags or machine ‘These ssemblaes re provisional kage of elements, agmens, Dow of heterogeneous bine ad seats which are never cramer by any {xo eteror coordinates and which ca therefore, a any moment extend beyond themselves, prolierte or be abolished (Goat, 196). Tew, {hing animals mans lof thee ber the same ooo ats. The Inimesher words, no hierarchy of being, no preordained order tothe colleion ad ‘Configuration ofthe tages no erralongaiation olan to which ‘hey must conform. Their aw’ is eather tbe inpesive of endless ‘xptrimenation, metamorphosis or varsmution, alignment apd ‘ligament. Tei ot ht the world x without rt oly datened; rather he irachierarenotchervalt af ubwancer ond hee ature ad tale bor of mode of organstion of disparate substances, They are “omporedof lines, of meting of pds and intents, ater than of things and thir lations. ASsemblages or mui, the, because they te enently ie movemen, aio atealways made, no found “Thay ae he consequences of space, wheter tbe that the bein ‘ello totbeflowerand beh orefasobject making something sing tools of implements They are mcesarily Rt i space and tie ovina and eprary asta hy alvayshavean case they do ovr aco not belong ts higher-order machine (Gron,1994 167-168) Daal Gs mci of throes in to aetr-gework theory in atention to non-human afency, conngee), Sind spi Tf snybing these atebute, ace powered up. Nowa “gency emptied bythe dere to which the ody sno longer sen = "inked or wifying catty an onan cented cher biloialy payehially egal in teams ofan overarching consciousness or uncon. ious, obese through ltentonainy or capacity for refleion a selreletio’ (Grose, 1994169}, The body moves prmiscous wih ll manner of asrblge, iti a tering. mas of malic (Deleuze and Gost, 187! Comingzcy is cpanel rough te vocbury of Grimctons, menses Haws, speeds Enes of fight. In Deleure and Stents Go eed nd vem noe ny Se Gea oa ec paaly wan ge a xa torn of the sr saa mcs Cain cco wd ought consequence of he Cain of the emo andor vce v- Ceoguphy thre [Cote crcal sa mene of thinking hgh Ta, a Fest ose provigil om wih 2 Seth pes kitty pel on han bet eran Copeny why fom co cer une tcy oom ree ero var ss pwc i Caen ona ouete ine eight pas | re nel ol ac te Mensa Pee | ae ett ee Sami doo oy = = {Deleuze and Guattari, 19: 96) hats commun cach of hese thse approaches technologies of Being ‘Nek in conaictom othe grand narrations of being by tears of ‘Soernity or posmodraty, wich a rth, are not much more than a {Raiaconery of modernisation theory (letandey, 195 they acini tend nore modest utaoatins of being which reader big ineligible in terms ofthe loesistion of routes, aie {iu technique within spe domains of action and vale: Haris {rato rooms bahay ouroms ad eharoms ‘onolingeooms and museum ples market and deparment store Toth apparent neni, eiiectionaty and reverb of tng we sa coupe smo of pl, plant 2nd races fnd in cach of these space repeoites of conduct ce eteated that are not bound by the enclosure formed bythe hom {Ered in al fm nh tir of nia hy ‘bra of eson aus pace thet seco aman Bins copes othe ewent that they cath them op in hybrid asemblages of Knowledges instrament vorbis systems of judgement and feeble (N Rowe, 1965 14-144) {hese ome of he base ees of so-sepeentionl hoy, wha {icieation notion of power domination and rsitanee? They sugges, Thin har such motion tect be reformulated in namber of different ws, Fins, and following Fou power: Thus for ermple cal thse tenet fom a pose conception the individuals nt to be conecved a imitiv atom, mile and ine ma fete or aginst which t happens tore uptctindhduals tac th aeady one of thepuceliccetree, tha sein bodies, erin gure, corain daroures soe Ronee ‘some tobe ented and conmtited asinine (Pouca, 196: 234) indice a contingent (but na itoaynca) conception sort of cementary nutes, cil on which power comer ie ke and ins doing subdue oy ‘Sccond, these toe sotto wat oy hat God rte ascent or the fn meds of ony. arte seem ‘edison deri how thre oey (out adie tockoratidyorsy Node 2 Sod of wc ane etapa ee ~ Scene ere scoop eae ee ko ‘pater only osofae - = ata tam 994997) i i hilows te hs oon of ower into te “capilty’ notion of power aed theca er Lona ste fom A aa hae ‘matey apecaf ere a on local siatons of etrogencous mati (Lam, {srmhopsin enor mc oe‘ bor wich sands fo coma dfs hls npc, nt ae sand a fe msi nd ro vr ete pe Mera Peo eo tt ec cans yeh Rae ann iene A hn sche Neher a thy ioe tage ae Froelich i dm 99 109 Aso wil dno ey sere wie i ‘Sta ig en se hs th ok world ely bgt mare oe ‘dni casa naw ee an wenpor set poins 1 cnet of spl ad sempra ‘eso irda in vb nono Bred oo lw ha bear eet eee ax their best... modest soiologes .. ae all shout dtribaton ‘olay, pun. And mot important they ae all about how these tre done in pacce. So when the sociology of order comple that inequality is absent Tow hear a illerent ind of complain: an thsi othe fc that the Sociologia order donot bay into = ‘eluesont commits to some fal version of ede: tha thy ee ot for instance, commited to pacar theory of ls a der trplain; tha they rele wo adope wht some Feminist Poe epizemology’ tha thst matriali slaonal eather than ‘alg tha thre no pri diction between the macro socal Spd the micosocial, The complaint are right, but dont elee {hi they ate jsfied, For ordering soiloge, wheter legit ot laerpretive prcfer wo explin Bow bierrcice come to be tol, cmbodied, performed ind vested. Butt chaowe vo look at berry nth way is acter to ignore nor to deny Rather ei to tell Stoves about its mechanisms, abot inmtances, abou oar we al da fed by dy. (La, 1996 13, ermphass ade) However in making these pointy, tao important to make lr the poston wit ke Pai cy ew ee ch | Powerin non tepretcrainal theo which dlr mpartant ways "Theft ofthese might beled ard line Foucmldian The scond might bec ater cham, de Crean Let me war by pointing ov whe these wo approaches sce men they wrt on owe Fis thy ac that lL sbjsnti aco se Bal’, ‘polypbon, pra working ‘many diacursive rede, many space, any tines. Tus people inhabit many diferent domains atone. and the negotiations feck, within and acrost groups, an eaordinaly complet tnd delicate sk, Tes ipoctant not preserve cer nity or singe | ‘membership tern the mingling of Humans or nonhumans, Wee / tllmargina in some road, a members of more than on comin / of practice (oil world. / (Se 199159) Second, ay gee tat his aration ia vegies of sje i -many ways, sulin o secure for rotace since ‘esianc is iaere inthe constiation of power its mo longer surprising that human beings ote find themes resting the foes of pesonbood that they are enjoined to adap, ‘Resin’ ifby ha one means opposition oa patslr regime for ‘he conduct of one's conduct reque o theory af ageny Te neds no acoun ofthe inherent forces within ary, nce hae own powers eign ate mansion that withthe demand of ve prior to and in confit with the dea isin ah dicptn: One so mer es he es sczoun for tesstince than one need an epistemology oe Pron of tthe Hanan Beg a ina formin whch ion On thy a os cusant moronn aco ier ye aie from the peeve of spose {rom the pepe o's psn ce tn chige cP fiche tems nent of spurious (N Rove 1966: 40-14) Thin hey aogre that prices can lays ted Srnec sich cot he cont of pon sno xP ed ee serch the pr gulf man nee ec se ‘minimal sense that human being, like all else, e sll aempes to think simply base, wists mecca ong edo es a form a Soap ‘Thus, in any one site of locale, humans tury ‘programmes intended for one end to the service of others. One way af the de Certeauian approach begin to erigieed icra den md network approach, there isa ‘tendency to assume a sort of uniform agen] ‘Steels lcheue bee nmin nee brody ke any other bjs ia construc an nse surface. lee that tt approach need ob empere, athe very least by arecognton of Ge pecel suru of embodiment of which de Geen writs in hit (kscrpon = the ordinary prstoners of the city... who} lve “down below’ low the decal se which viity gine They walk an deme Uy lorm of thiseperene of the chy they are wakes, wendesman iy where bodies follow the upe and downs of an ‘Urban text they {irae wibout bing able ret "The paths which respond ch ‘Ghee thisimeremiemen,mecsined poems of which each body | aaa oeeltyeuyoke olen smd reer iecencay 198293) KE In other words « Foucallian approach cannot aprre he special qualities | Ul the body whieh flow from etc ntae (Play, 1967): i imply demonstrate thatthe body's fonctions and. movemts are shaped by Tocoure withouconideringhe he, exprenive side of itcexisence. Thus ‘hough eopresenaion a txt the body alesis marginalised ” “The consequence ofthis situation i ht, within discourse, the ved til seenredhnowale ony through te constrctios chat ares ‘lp relies bu uence a2 Hved ety is effectvely denied, [Nevethlery tis absence conics to command the anton of ‘horse who repeat sok to represent tht which ssimaancously ‘bing dsnvowsd: rom the pespecve of dicouse the body is « [bueditcd term which, bashed to the cneepeal shadows on Ties eit so arnamelens man charged with significance, That SSeticane ang from a materiality and = source of power beyond ‘oro, ve tht eis the object of repeated tempts to banish on Thcomeand snd incade sd contain con the othe. ale, 195:7) “This tension booms parca scat when the dntin baweon the bovis of mea aod women are minimised, usually by decorporaling the Fgure of he woman For example in the radial anahumansim of Deleuze _ ted Guatari womens bodies and wubjecvie are deterred. ony 0 Ee eid m pr «mare nvr move of becoming (Grose, 194) The, tere the aia downgrading th conversions erpday fers whl eof asic’ communicative ctv are ced. They Slnply do nt gure in the monclogialFoucaldan model in whichis often Seema tha the Lind of “onging argumentative conduct of fit and justifcation whee eer argumentative move” a formule asa response {o previous move? (Shot, 193 4) x rgeded 38 «secondary phenom ‘a Hat the dilemmas of discourse are ele in prac, nt in coy ‘Something cl thn follows. The ate to make amas na non-humans inc simply dfleren lcasons in erworks or assemblages, with humans iecoming es performed by them sno 8 spe (ety throug) 8 ‘i may a ist som: i dificult deny that human bois hav cesin powers within the planet practice which haere consequences for sta ‘xenon (Piherng 1998). "A second divergence concerns “wnsuccenfl” or “marginal” networks; rework nth very ile power How i i pouibl inthe ngaage of stor ‘eawork theory tke law account theft tha ‘every enrolment fn ‘sworn ha fle snol and a dstrtion af the world ofthe romenolled’ (Sian, 199 4). Ar Sar notes they marca and wether rework srerarly completely dsroyed. They work nthe background. Of {une thy ca al infor the cots alld in ger neework. But the {aera that xs dificult net ee this sa significa acum with which che Foucauldan account only deals engetly. To conan, the Ceteauian spoon fon ce he binge aot hog emp on feet heer Tn turn, hs aproach might be widened out a more genet fous on “weapons ofthe weak (Sot 1985) which provides whale sea aordances which can be ployed in marginal networks Such weapons can ext even Tn the mow henly monitored societies For example, Jowit (1982) as ened how in Ruri 'diniultion’, the wihdrvwal from a ofS Sgliere which can only mean woubl, wes a mrgial practice in Rusian ran soit. Then it Bossme sent element of every Hein Soviet ie eee xtra es ep eeeen epee a en ai powrSorctsoceies since the silat abet refies all pic “The idenication of disimalatve posere asthe means of intogeting public and privates Jot’ genuine theresa contribution, which ‘Sings hin out amongst Western students of Russa who peeve hat there something specie about the way poble and private hang together in commune socees but fll to esprare i ina concept Jowt managed pinpoint he ental socal rte aml every ‘Sovie hizen in the 1970s and 1980s yng something wie bicring the opposite o be uc parpating in ssi nls ust forthe ake ‘of partition even bringing up children by teling them a schism xis Between what i and what ought fo be, a shim not to be Ine pba ht had deerBethe word ite (hachoein, 1995: 209) [A third divergence concerns the means by wick ‘rng’ is counted fo Inthe Foucsblin scour the constant tation which everyday eines ito discourses given ater than an abet of inveigaion. Bu the ‘ements of anther acount of word of permanent dog, and lemma {caaved jn paces an be assembled fom the work of de Certs snd ‘thers The aecoane would rest on ive oly rele fe. One would be {he importance ofthe Wagering ito cul-fallowing to fll {tule elfen meas not following al Kinds of eetve inpovisaions are Speco wy erg ny a ieee teen oe on arto, Another foo. would be provided BY em ee The mines which are normal in practi everyday condita Pan way in which tris about the world are changed a hey ae Tee es han my Sepia ect a ge Siena cha Patek ae eg me setele Gen oFkee lc we ge Ih re Mel oe ee Te sore a ob pin ig “ (sadora Duncan, cited in Bateson, 197) sow wa al hho oes, eminon d sce og fr el pn hoe ier de ee py mage am ig er Hens en ahaa a Senet cps pcan oman 0 Tit on ns See. ght eg a ay ri et ts can pity iad cn noose sah a ce mi te rhe 2 hak comand fe a er frei “avs fly ered er Aileen” whose pay generates pron things and thi separations Sand unions PAY Boner a (ros, 194 102-105 Secon, bodiment is prac That itis insoled in ration with he ‘ord wc sabay cnging und jon wih ober an ec Ser cg of hn nd re anny rh ‘clans, with wich peopl ae rsd yh nd of Lane) they are" (Shotter, 1993: 12) aa “ied always inves ober bjs The objec won is ok washer bills embed ems ct te ek the tho toh nore compen lac: Lt mami eine ge bet by poiming thelr on new desronicctnconer er, ‘sings tis erate tok ease ene ak

You might also like