A chapter of the book "geographies of resistance" edited by Steve Pile and Michael Keith. The chapter focuses on a geographical approach to dancing, very very interesting!
A chapter of the book "geographies of resistance" edited by Steve Pile and Michael Keith. The chapter focuses on a geographical approach to dancing, very very interesting!
A chapter of the book "geographies of resistance" edited by Steve Pile and Michael Keith. The chapter focuses on a geographical approach to dancing, very very interesting!
6
THE STILL PoinT
embodiment and uence
Ashe sil pong ofthe
Neth rom nor tow
Bat neither cet nor movement. Aad do nels,
‘Where past and fue ae gathered. Nekher movesent fom nor
towards,
cep forthe poi the stl pine,
‘There would be no dance, thr ion the dance,
‘TS. Elo, The For Quartets
I aay hl res th he word era
alo quicly eure p= ory.
ingreving of ry
the seveneemk corey
Seni wor nigel by ee
Mires, 98) On te ar had
Soyo mrad lage cal may
om nation fide al gry
spol resune™~wich nad
sete pila the dime tt
tealinay even (os 98821)"
"Ths kod of thiking shat ai
Sol romani
foe ino the di
parol cs
{Boonie
‘ths end,
caw
In acempting onset
spf Wake Bejan
ee
‘wong worl, Nhe flesh nor ese,
gatthestl pain cherie ance
"On the one had
‘of «politics of ‘overeucning, question.
(Hil 1975: 14} whch strech all dy fs
old ened psi down’ to the ewes
es at of Beauty” (MER, 1996
0 qual preity cone op
mck of he whch ide
eaivay™ wo culal “produc
tothe kindof errs thas end
‘rasing your er on Sunday i
ng abou restance with cs implicit David versus
as oe very dint disadvantage everything hare
tomy of esstance or submission andl of the
hich anno be undesod in this way rman hidden
1 were conser estan in teres fundamen
ston hare en mach infor by he
Michel de Conn T wort fas Ld
Sep ee
Bet raced ere er ey eaeelSiny
Serres
Mostained but not defined by dominant social orders. Yet, ultimately, both
eben
ett ham
pec nn re Nees ees
pee ere er ee
ee ee ee ee
eo er ee
Sos rere nie fetes na ced
fare Sean tS ee
Sees a ee ers ae
rae
cee eee
ere One
=e
‘We mos finaly face p to theak of any pre-esalished orders in the
oa)
(Shoe, 1993: 25)Tas beg 280% something remarkable has hag
terbqunuteplacntr wy Sr apn or hy
‘he poral
it T call on-represcatational theory or the ther
Err Ssh tr cn ud ating ty
vfs) aa aal sciences and humanities for example in philoso,
Depa ay ann rete aa
oko eel cr tig Oc
Bing ke wod ce mettn se
mush renown Thy "oY Gili
iar ete St ea ptm
‘usr ll bat nie wether i dene
THR tee inlet tem tha pare wha ce mani
SERENE Scot in providing ach guise, th
Eiticounes eplntion and knowles cone eo eee
covery of how the wold "rely" iyisreprsension bee the
shine akth comin of nage it aloan a
TR atc of hte go Sade
sean contre wih propsiontad dana het eo
ings our way ofloking at things by "moving eae hE
2 97 king neh pyr
ht amend ctl lig
eMac pmo omen tes mers thes
wees de uy lec nae
‘iter tery sly Pan ma
ine 8:9
ait senting psa ew tnd a patne
fans my yb op tiny ame OF
rn psy pea fm he
ia ide
‘What, then is non repre
exe PO rpesnttinl theory? We can summarise it min
| Non-rprsemtions
| sep ml eheory is about pracics, mundane everyday
__—_
poctces, that shape the conduct of human beings towards others and
Fpcmsche in parca sns/The domain of inventguion iste dnorbed
‘fl eopingo thx practic nd the concer i heefore —
ot x0 much .. with wt ssig che supposedly true nature of what
omehing i entempltvely, se with stemptng to tial bow
moment by moment, we aft conduct ot practi everydy allie
omehing we wally lave urackoowladge in the background to
courte
(Sbose, 996-2)
A opresn and eng,
Showing anna? of)
[Tiziano then, project concerned
wiih. the pevformatvepeniaton?
\ ery Ci, 1960.
2 Now-epresetnional theory i concerned with the paces af sub
Jesifeaion (aoe the ere “on, not wi the sbjos. A numberof
Ssequenes follow. Fir, the subject aly deenred. Human Being
thoupeok a
4 kindof machnaion, a hybrid of fs, knowledge pasion, and
fecnigu. One af the character of esr of teal
i ayo lectin apn an acing al Ur ern
cee and ancnlge to tre of tied persona to Be
‘ere, dacoered or worked nn acs mctnron of tes =
thee cody form the hvion ofthe ike Bet hs achnson
ede to be reaped at psi gino sipieston of rset
ig
ose, 1964 144)
Inflows tac suchan approach egies
‘only «minimal, wesk oe thin eoegpion of human materi on which
history writs. the humsn being here ata enty with sony,
burthe tage ofa multiply of types of work, morelike a tad or
a longiade at which diferent vcore of diferent spate inten The {
“ntersoriy’ which so many fel compelled o diagnose is not ha of
psychologial system, but of + dacontinious sirlas, Kind of
Inflding exerioty
(oss, 19864 1427
‘But, second the abet i sl embodied. This means much more than the
actual shape and inate capaci ofthe ban ody Tess involves ase
ener sl and carl silt. Meden-Ponty (192. 14) makes ib
Slnincon clear
"The body our general medium for having a word. Sometimes itis
restiaed to scons secrsry for the conservation of if, and
‘cordingly i pois sound wr Kooga! won at eter tine, |‘laborating upon these pri running
Primary ston and running fom thee
Somerton, seein fit of motor habits [sic] such as dance”
Sapna he man ined canoe hea
bets nt ncn ma fh he
‘Projects thereby around itself « cultural woeld. a
‘Ac allembodinent is ctl inv
bay in other word, sundentoed i
ne an active rip onthe wor
tems af wht an do (Gron19RN
ptin edges Melen-Pont cr
Bulbuingwiehthsyes—tstng imalingendece hore
Keg Theta duam nsocgven orn eee
tod the ough he sek and he cy the nl se
vento movemers ofthe hand hat ppt oe
Pra acing, perialy, across seen aoe nn
atemed ways ich movements modeacd
ons ooking
tnd hey ae
(Ling 19:7 cing Meens- Ponty, 19623179
"Ths eve an activity ike studying, innocent in is uni
Guy sl bein for some ough handing too" Cag Taos fe
\ Same and Mal, 16) Thr hea ease tes a8
Smeg incidental or nimi to nbjctaion Whe ee
becoming bj ge
tha ee aged sa wie
snl, an absence da
inlnporbi ete es
‘eins a ae
poychouysiseet ona nation of dase
sitet ob le hough tes
inden. hat rcs a
machine alliances wend of ign
posing ito the vented feats
[phe si oohingaboveis own rleraion orate
Xcasemble things ou sagas sa ecg
down ino hei snglrties enor toe nae Mme
(Gros, 194:165)
Sanit aBs bles ened in mb ton dsl practices, hat
2% imelisealy, we pay mos tenon to thse kin of avy in
—_
which we suppose peopl to know what hey are dong in-which hey
shane aire nein eee
es ae a are
SELENE ed ares eg
TESS ns deo ghee
is iota the light of day, bu because the formative influences shaping
ce ree oe Soaly dary ow ii ke
ei wie ee
(thc Sn ee mc pra
ee es Taroom aaa
rae ee ee
ear ntsc dean en ele
SE re
ee oe eee
not ankaowledgebl) kind of acti.
ining hugo hid tay.
Jone ction has a number of impor fears. To bein with ie
Jicdncndedcomsoqcnce, Cat is us consequences which are Hot
tended by ty ofthe paripans nan interaction But ae oot utc
‘Theo acon bas entonaliy,
tht yt any ene moment he ome pope const wen
Ron hae 2 cing pass uh ony ean fer
2a wi hsb prop, we th be eed
teand wil be gored or even sctioed
Unfting rnappropiate and wl Bei nance
ine on
ein ain aay a naive rtore-pont fom, di
‘Rp, Sar geno Tat
ora characte which dre on diferent krwleges which do
ea ae Tnsen atarert bs cornet make
Scot dng be oa tcl eveything ses fine
pepe pitas.
Eo ease
ee se ne
pti ens eer ret oes
auing 2 maximum gap on the world” (Dreyfs, 19%: 10). Send(Grossberg, 1992) Third, boas space thesore ramets into si of|
toners whichenoruntes we rodeo
In other word, at an isanc of che joint ction Berween ther, people
find themselves ina seeing ven sition an organised son
‘hae har ‘horizon’ eo abd ie ope to tei acon, Indeed
‘orgniantion such thatthe contin (and emblem) ie makes
‘valle inlonce tha ist sy, invite” oe “inhibit, peopl’ next
pombe sctione
(Shower, 1995:47)
AAs eeu geography “wrens hicry from itself in order to discover
‘comings tha donot belong t0 history even if they all back ino fe
(Ddleuzeand Gusta 1994590)"
(9) Now-epresemational theory is concerned with technologies of beng,
“hybrid atembages of knowledges instrument; persons eyes of jg
men ulin and spaces underpianed at the programmatic evelby centin
resuppostion about, and objetves for, human being” (N. Ree, 16a
132) Sach an approach ass complex genealogy, bot fight Be suggested
that thre major example can curren be found "The it ofthese he
‘ecalogil approach of Foacal, Foca tempted vo prove» number
{oF egional’ examples of tchnoogier which ale moder lf big human
ther objec One, the dicpinary technology operates in erm os dead
structuring of space, ie and reasons amonga avis, through proce
Aare of hierarchical observation and normal jodgement, nd throagh
tempo fold shee agement int the procedures and judgemens which
‘ch nid! wes to order their own conduct Another the pao
‘echooogy attempts bul
‘lain of pial pidance beimeen sn authority and cach member of
Sei eck being ch leo ad
close, exemplary. an dipship enfolded int the person
eet way of eae of al vee ere ol
Aisne, elfdciphrmon sod slurry Like dip ths
pastoral echnslogy cpa of tation i» range of cet
forms nthe ration of rie and prihinc be pa ed patent
socal werk and cen and nthe elton ote edad sje to
me
(N Rose, 196 152)
A second ctampe isso sctornetwork theory (which in sme of its
version owes a deh to Foal). Acorneework tory an atempt 10
‘Produce an scout oftchnolopes of sng whch more perforate an
tht provided by Fone The work ld plored, embedded and
represented in mater tha ar only pany soa Th onder stot
thn ake plc sing thse mater produce more os age neworks
that remove or fan scl scoring to hr byt aml he
ees et teases ed ic atc ar tee et
thes endless strug In prsiesla,actornetwook theory provides hee
ferences rom te Foucallian ode. Tit gives mch greater rleto
fon human agency Homan and non-human agents ae ssocted with one
nother in erworks and evolve topether wh these networks Actor
rework theory is therefore syeumtealwid respect o human and non
Iman agency Second, gives eater emphasis 0 contingency,
4 mode of understanding is always limited, Ie sometimes generates
Prous pool of eppaens order. Certny i does’ old che world
Inthe pp of toning hegemony: Bue hs i righ then there age
auenion that Foural tends ta efuse, Though cher ae exepion in
fis work ~as for isance in the opening chaps of The Order of
‘Things moet ten he avoids esplanng the ways in which discourses
‘rmodet of ordering interac sche are aval tld, erormed apd
‘embodied in the networks ofthe soci But my argument is tha
‘queions of changes inthe moe of eering, onthe one hand a
tha imteacon onthe other, ae closely relate. Agents, dessions
machines, organiations and ther envionment speech, ation, texts
want ro sy thot all of thee change Beetae they are recursive
ingerordng or terdncrsive elas Tey all da, ell, embody oF
perorma network of muliply-ordringrelions-
(haw 19:22)
In other word, as Law (199: 2) psi ‘psstracralism mes symbolic
incr? Third actor network theory providers mach more central ole
{espace han normaly found in Foacal accounts (Law 19%: 102) Space
ie ot jst at of dillerene compatible o incompatible orders. In actor
network tory, pace constructed by networks pce is costantly made
‘noble durable ad rode
toot dhe agumon spl. Ista some materials bee than
‘er And sme travel hee than other Voes dn’ It fr log,
fd they don’ tel very far soil ordering depended on voices
lone i would be» very loal fac Bes travel beer than vices
fd they tend lat ver: Bu they can only each 3 fa ad once
they are out of your ight you canbe sre hat they will do wha you
have told them So soc crdering tht res ypon the soma Hable
to be small in scope and ited in soccer Text lo have thee
‘rawbacks, They an be brbed, lx, rninerpeted. On the othe
hand he tn 0 eravel well nd they Lt well they aze properly
looked ater So texts may have ordering effects ha spread seroas the
timeand space And other materials may have sir tects. The Palas
‘de Verses hs lasted wll nd machines, though they vary, may be
Ino and ast for longer thon peopl
"This them ithe simple wy of puting The agumen is tht arge-
scale atiempes a ondeig or dvaciton depend onthe cretion of‘nhac Brun Latur cl “inmucabe mob’ materials tht can ay
{ecard abou wend oretai hel shape But opt iia i wy
Soo simple sounds at Tam saying chat mobility and dra
= nei -aretemelves lation eects Concrete walle ae sold
hil they are maintained snd puto Tee order oly if ey ae
tot destroyed enroute sd heres someone athe ther end who wl
ead them and order thir conduct accordingly. Buildings may be
‘Moped or ther wes for nance, a abject of che tour ase So
{nate san eller. And ies durable o there a3 foetion of
Inebeaton nthe nonwork ofthe sci
(ae, 1994 102)
A thie example i provided by the work of Deleze and Guat For
Deleuze and Gusta, the world made up of asemblags or machine
‘These ssemblaes re provisional kage of elements, agmens, Dow
of heterogeneous bine ad seats which are never cramer by any
{xo eteror coordinates and which ca therefore, a any moment extend
beyond themselves, prolierte or be abolished (Goat, 196). Tew,
{hing animals mans lof thee ber the same ooo ats. The
Inimesher words,
no hierarchy of being, no preordained order tothe colleion ad
‘Configuration ofthe tages no erralongaiation olan to which
‘hey must conform. Their aw’ is eather tbe inpesive of endless
‘xptrimenation, metamorphosis or varsmution, alignment apd
‘ligament. Tei ot ht the world x without rt oly datened;
rather he irachierarenotchervalt af ubwancer ond hee ature ad
tale bor of mode of organstion of disparate substances, They are
“omporedof lines, of meting of pds and intents, ater than of
things and thir lations. ASsemblages or mui, the, because
they te enently ie movemen, aio atealways made, no found
“Thay ae he consequences of space, wheter tbe that the bein
‘ello totbeflowerand beh orefasobject making something sing
tools of implements They are mcesarily Rt i space and tie
ovina and eprary asta hy alvayshavean case they do
ovr aco not belong ts higher-order machine
(Gron,1994 167-168)
Daal Gs mci of throes in
to aetr-gework theory in atention to non-human afency, conngee),
Sind spi Tf snybing these atebute, ace powered up. Nowa
“gency emptied bythe dere to which the ody sno longer sen =
"inked or wifying catty an onan cented cher biloialy
payehially egal in teams ofan overarching consciousness or uncon.
ious, obese through ltentonainy or capacity for refleion a
selreletio’ (Grose, 1994169}, The body moves prmiscous wih ll
manner of asrblge, iti a tering. mas of malic (Deleuze and
Gost, 187! Comingzcy is cpanel rough te vocbury of
Grimctons, menses Haws, speeds Enes of fight. In Deleure and
Stents Go eed nd vem noe ny Se
Gea oa ec paaly wan ge a xa torn of the sr
saa mcs Cain cco wd ought consequence of he
Cain of the emo andor vce v- Ceoguphy thre
[Cote crcal sa mene of thinking hgh Ta, a
Fest ose provigil om wih 2
Seth pes kitty pel on han bet
eran Copeny why fom co
cer une tcy oom ree
ero var ss pwc
i Caen ona ouete ine eight pas |
re nel ol ac te Mensa Pee |
ae ett ee Sami doo oy
= = {Deleuze and Guattari, 19: 96)
hats commun cach of hese thse approaches technologies of Being
‘Nek in conaictom othe grand narrations of being by tears of
‘Soernity or posmodraty, wich a rth, are not much more than a
{Raiaconery of modernisation theory (letandey, 195 they acini tend
nore modest utaoatins of being which
reader big ineligible in terms ofthe loesistion of routes, aie
{iu technique within spe domains of action and vale: Haris
{rato rooms bahay ouroms ad eharoms
‘onolingeooms and museum ples market and deparment store
Toth apparent neni, eiiectionaty and reverb of
tng we sa coupe smo of pl, plant 2nd
races fnd in cach of these space repeoites of conduct ce
eteated that are not bound by the enclosure formed bythe hom
{Ered in al fm nh tir of nia hy
‘bra of eson aus pace thet seco aman Bins copes
othe ewent that they cath them op in hybrid asemblages of
Knowledges instrament vorbis systems of judgement and
feeble
(N Rowe, 1965 14-144)
{hese ome of he base ees of so-sepeentionl hoy, wha
{icieation notion of power domination and rsitanee? They sugges,
Thin har such motion tect be reformulated in namber of different
ws,Fins, and following Fou
power: Thus for ermple
cal thse tenet fom a pose conception
the individuals nt to be conecved a
imitiv atom, mile and ine ma
fete or aginst which t happens tore
uptctindhduals tac th aeady one of thepuceliccetree,
tha sein bodies, erin gure, corain daroures soe Ronee
‘some tobe ented and conmtited asinine
(Pouca, 196: 234)
indice a contingent (but na itoaynca) conception
sort of cementary nutes,
cil on which power comer ie
ke and ins doing subdue oy
‘Sccond, these toe
sotto wat oy hat God rte ascent
or the fn meds of ony. arte seem
‘edison deri how thre
oey (out adie
tockoratidyorsy Node
2 Sod of wc ane
etapa
ee
~ Scene ere
scoop eae ee ko
‘pater only osofae - =
ata tam 994997)
i i hilows te hs oon of ower into te
“capilty’ notion of power aed
theca er Lona ste fom A aa hae
‘matey apecaf ere a
on
local siatons
of etrogencous mati (Lam,
{srmhopsin enor mc oe‘ bor wich
sands fo coma dfs hls npc, nt ae
sand a fe msi nd ro
vr ete pe Mera Peo
eo tt ec cans yeh
Rae ann iene A hn
sche Neher a thy ioe tage ae
Froelich
i dm 99 109
Aso wil dno ey sere wie i
‘Sta ig en se hs
th ok world ely bgt mare oe
‘dni casa naw
ee
an wenpor set poins 1 cnet of spl ad sempra
‘eso irda in vb nono Bred oo lw ha bear
eet eee
ax their best... modest soiologes .. ae all shout dtribaton
‘olay, pun. And mot important they ae all about how these
tre done in pacce. So when the sociology of order comple that
inequality is absent Tow hear a illerent ind of complain: an
thsi othe fc that the Sociologia order donot bay into =
‘eluesont commits to some fal version of ede: tha thy ee
ot for instance, commited to pacar theory of ls a der
trplain; tha they rele wo adope wht some Feminist
Poe epizemology’ tha thst matriali slaonal eather than
‘alg tha thre no pri diction between the macro socal
Spd the micosocial, The complaint are right, but dont elee
{hi they ate jsfied, For ordering soiloge, wheter legit ot
laerpretive prcfer wo explin Bow bierrcice come to be tol,
cmbodied, performed ind vested. Butt chaowe vo look at berry
nth way is acter to ignore nor to deny Rather ei to tell
Stoves about its mechanisms, abot inmtances, abou oar we al da
fed by dy.
(La, 1996 13, ermphass ade)
However in making these pointy, tao important to make lr the
poston wit ke Pai cy ew ee ch |
Powerin non tepretcrainal theo which dlr mpartant ways
"Theft ofthese might beled ard line Foucmldian The scond might
bec ater cham, de Crean Let me war by pointing ov whe
these wo approaches sce men they wrt on owe Fis thy ac that
lL sbjsnti aco se Bal’, ‘polypbon, pra working
‘many diacursive rede, many space, any tines. Tus
people inhabit many diferent domains atone. and the negotiations
feck, within and acrost groups, an eaordinaly complet
tnd delicate sk, Tes ipoctant not preserve cer nity or singe |
‘membership tern the mingling of Humans or nonhumans, Wee /
tllmargina in some road, a members of more than on comin /
of practice (oil world. /
(Se 199159)
Second, ay gee tat his aration ia vegies of sje i
-many ways, sulin o secure for rotace since ‘esianc is iaere
inthe constiation of power
its mo longer surprising that human beings ote find themes
resting the foes of pesonbood that they are enjoined to adap,
‘Resin’ ifby ha one means opposition oa patslr regime for
‘he conduct of one's conduct reque o theory af ageny Te nedsno acoun ofthe inherent forces within
ary, nce hae own powers eign ate
mansion that withthe demand of
ve prior to and in confit with the dea
isin ah dicptn: One so mer es he es
sczoun for tesstince than one need an epistemology oe
Pron of tthe Hanan Beg a
ina formin whch ion On thy a os
cusant moronn aco ier ye aie
from the peeve of spose
{rom the pepe o's psn ce tn chige cP
fiche tems nent of spurious
(N Rove 1966: 40-14)
Thin hey aogre that prices can lays ted
Srnec
sich cot he cont of pon sno xP ed ee
serch the pr gulf man nee ec se
‘minimal sense that human being, like all else, e sll aempes to
think simply base, wists mecca ong edo es
a form a Soap ‘Thus, in any one site of locale, humans tury
‘programmes intended for one end to the service of others. One way af
the de Certeauian approach begin to erigieed
icra den md
network approach, there isa ‘tendency to assume a sort of uniform agen]
‘Steels lcheue bee nmin nee
brody ke any other bjs ia construc an nse surface. lee that
tt approach need ob empere, athe very least by arecognton of
Ge pecel suru of embodiment of which de Geen writs in hit
(kscrpon =
the ordinary prstoners of the city... who} lve “down below’
low the decal se which viity gine They walk an deme
Uy lorm of thiseperene of the chy they are wakes, wendesman
iy where bodies follow the upe and downs of an ‘Urban text they
{irae wibout bing able ret "The paths which respond ch
‘Ghee thisimeremiemen,mecsined poems of which each body |
aaa oeeltyeuyoke olen
smd reer iecencay 198293) KE
In other words « Foucallian approach cannot aprre he special qualities |
Ul the body whieh flow from etc ntae (Play, 1967): i imply
demonstrate thatthe body's fonctions and. movemts are shaped by
Tocoure withouconideringhe he, exprenive side of itcexisence. Thus
‘hough eopresenaion a txt the body alesis marginalised ”
“The consequence ofthis situation i ht, within discourse, the ved
til seenredhnowale ony through te constrctios chat ares
‘lp relies bu uence a2 Hved ety is effectvely denied,
[Nevethlery tis absence conics to command the anton of
‘horse who repeat sok to represent tht which ssimaancously
‘bing dsnvowsd: rom the pespecve of dicouse the body is «
[bueditcd term which, bashed to the cneepeal shadows on
Ties eit so arnamelens man charged with significance, That
SSeticane ang from a materiality and = source of power beyond
‘oro, ve tht eis the object of repeated tempts to banish on
Thcomeand snd incade sd contain con the othe.
ale, 195:7)
“This tension booms parca scat when the dntin baweon the
bovis of mea aod women are minimised, usually by decorporaling the
Fgure of he woman For example in the radial anahumansim of Deleuze _
ted Guatari womens bodies and wubjecvie are deterred. ony 0
Ee eid m pr «mare nvr move of becoming
(Grose, 194) The, tere the aia downgrading th conversions
erpday fers whl eof asic’ communicative ctv are ced. They
Slnply do nt gure in the monclogialFoucaldan model in whichis often
Seema tha the Lind of “onging argumentative conduct of fit and
justifcation whee eer argumentative move” a formule asa response
{o previous move? (Shot, 193 4) x rgeded 38 «secondary phenom
‘a Hat the dilemmas of discourse are ele in prac, nt in coy
‘Something cl thn follows. The ate to make amas na non-humans
inc simply dfleren lcasons in erworks or assemblages, with humans
iecoming es performed by them sno 8 spe (ety throug) 8‘i may a ist som: i dificult deny that human bois hav cesin
powers within the planet practice which haere consequences for sta
‘xenon (Piherng 1998).
"A second divergence concerns “wnsuccenfl” or “marginal” networks;
rework nth very ile power How i i pouibl inthe ngaage of stor
‘eawork theory tke law account theft tha ‘every enrolment fn
‘sworn ha fle snol and a dstrtion af the world ofthe
romenolled’ (Sian, 199 4). Ar Sar notes they marca and wether
rework srerarly completely dsroyed. They work nthe background. Of
{une thy ca al infor the cots alld in ger neework. But the
{aera that xs dificult net ee this sa significa acum with which che
Foucauldan account only deals engetly. To conan, the Ceteauian
spoon fon ce he binge aot hog emp on
feet heer
Tn turn, hs aproach might be widened out a more genet fous on
“weapons ofthe weak (Sot 1985) which provides whale sea aordances
which can be ployed in marginal networks Such weapons can ext even
Tn the mow henly monitored societies For example, Jowit (1982) as
ened how in Ruri 'diniultion’, the wihdrvwal from a ofS
Sgliere which can only mean woubl, wes a mrgial practice in Rusian
ran soit. Then it Bossme sent element of every Hein Soviet
ie eee xtra es ep eeeen epee a en
ai powrSorctsoceies since the silat abet refies all pic
“The idenication of disimalatve posere asthe means of intogeting
public and privates Jot’ genuine theresa contribution, which
‘Sings hin out amongst Western students of Russa who peeve hat
there something specie about the way poble and private hang
together in commune socees but fll to esprare i ina concept
Jowt managed pinpoint he ental socal rte aml every
‘Sovie hizen in the 1970s and 1980s yng something wie bicring
the opposite o be uc parpating in ssi nls ust forthe ake
‘of partition even bringing up children by teling them a schism
xis Between what i and what ought fo be, a shim not to be
Ine pba ht had deerBethe word ite
(hachoein, 1995: 209)
[A third divergence concerns the means by wick ‘rng’ is counted fo
Inthe Foucsblin scour the constant tation which everyday eines
ito discourses given ater than an abet of inveigaion. Bu the
‘ements of anther acount of word of permanent dog, and lemma
{caaved jn paces an be assembled fom the work of de Certs snd
‘thers The aecoane would rest on ive oly rele fe. One would be
{he importance ofthe Wagering ito cul-fallowing to fll
{tule elfen meas not following al Kinds of eetve inpovisaions are
Speco wy erg ny a
ieee teen
oe on arto, Another foo. would be provided BY
em ee The mines which are normal in practi everyday condita
Pan way in which tris about the world are changed a hey ae
Tee es han my
Sepia ect a ge
Siena cha Patek ae eg
me setele Gen oFkee lc we ge
Ih re Mel oe ee
Te sore a ob pin ig
“ (sadora Duncan, cited in Bateson, 197)
sow wa al hho oes, eminon d
sce og fr el pn hoe
ier de ee py
mage am ig er Hens en
ahaa a
Senet cps pcan oman 0
Tit on ns See.
ght eg a ay
ri et ts can pity
iad cn noose sah a ce mi te rhe
2 hak comand fe
a er frei
“avs fly ered erAileen” whose pay generates pron things and thi separations
Sand unions PAY Boner a
(ros, 194 102-105
Secon, bodiment is prac That itis insoled in ration with he
‘ord wc sabay cnging und jon wih ober an ec
Ser cg of hn nd re anny rh
‘clans, with wich peopl ae rsd yh nd of Lane)
they are" (Shotter, 1993: 12) aa
“ied always inves ober bjs The objec won is ok
washer bills embed ems ct te ek
the tho toh nore compen lac: Lt mami eine ge
bet by poiming thelr on new desronicctnconer er,
‘sings tis erate tok ease ene ak