42 views

Uploaded by api-312401337

- Fluid Dynamics on Adaptative Airfoils
- Afwal Tm 84 203 Prediction of Aerodynamic Drag
- PrinciplesOfGliderFlight-LiftDragPerformance
- Lectures on Wind Tunnel
- wind tunnel
- Lift Distribution SylviaVilleda
- NACA-TN-3911
- Ch 9 Flow Over Immersed Bodies Web
- Fluid Mechanics 2
- Styling
- Chapter 15
- Janiszewska Jolanta M
- Drag and lift reduction of a 3D bluff-body using active vortex.pdf
- analysis of angle of attack on lift force
- Objective Questions
- RASAero Users Manual
- 1-s2.0-S1270963813000771-main.pdf
- Group-C
- Project 3
- Speed Limits on Swimming of Fishes

You are on page 1of 18

Mr. Pochop

Aerospace Engineering

Xfoil Project

The main point of the project was to become familiar with all the tools xfoil has,

that way we can use the program later on when building airfoils. We have examined

many coefficients such as; lift, drag, pressure, friction, and moments, and after doing

the project, it is much easier to analyse all these different graphs and data charts.

Overall, I did receive much different data for the graphs of the coefficients compared to

the NACA 2415 airfoil that was tested in the wind tunnels back in the day.

Pressure Coefficients

The actual tested data from NACA 2415 graph was a little different than the data

received on xfoil. NACA original gave a .6 coefficient of lift compared to .755 that was

found on xfoil. The moment Coefficient was -.2 on the original graphs and xfoil was -.1.

Some of this error may be due to the fact that xfoil is run off a computer rather than in a

Procedures

1. Find Pressure coefficients at 4 and 9 degrees with a reynolds number at 3

million. Xfoil= > Naca 2415 Oper => re 3e6 Oper => Visc

5. Plot data from the sequence in excel and explain the meaning and compare the

8. Look at the drag data and find whether drag is because of skin friction or

pressure.

million.

The dotted Lines are the inviscid solution where the colored lines are the viscid solution .

3 million

Viscid Solution CL= 1.2145 CM = -.0463 CD = .00107

The inviscid solution is different from the viscous solution because inviscid does

not take into consideration viscosity which makes sense given its name. Viscous deals

with real airflow and how it would react over the airfoil. That is why there are the yellow

and blue lines as well, because the air has to split up and travel on either side, where as

In both airfoils, the air becomes turbulent at about 75% of the chord length of the

airfoil. On the top of side of the airfoil the pressure coefficient is about -0.3 and on the

Skin Friction Charts

Angle of attack set to 4 degrees:

At .05% the skin friction is has a lot of friction at .0095. This makes sense

because this is basically where the air first hits the airfoil. The skin friction transition

points on the top are at 30% the Friction Coeff is at about .0005 then spikes to .0067 at

38% chord length where the skin friction is larger. This is where the air is going

turbulent probably right where the boundary layer and separation occur.

This is basically the same idea as the first chart. The friction is at its peak (.017)

at the very beginning (.05%), then the friction spikes up again once it is about to hit its

boundary layer (10%). Looking back, the second peak actually looks like it is where the

air first hits the airfoil, because on the cpx graph, the airfoil starts at 10%. My

hypothesis is that the friction is actually very high right before the airfoil hits that air, but

this could also be wrong because I do not really know how friction works before it

Pacc, Aseq:

Uses a range of -18 degrees to 24 degrees with an interval of .5 for all sets

of data.

This is the data we got from running the program in xfoil, it shows the pressure

coefficient at every angle between -18 and 24 degrees. I then transferred the data from

xfoil and put it on excel in order to make better charts and graphs. This was repeated

Reynolds Number: 6 million

Reynolds Number: 9 million

Every graph looked similar to the original NACA 2415 graphs, but they all were

slightly off too. This is most likely due to the scales of the graph, the scales for the

graph we used were different. Also, xfoil is a program running these situations, and the

original graphs were tested through actual wind tunnels which may make the data

different.

The angle of attack where the lift to drag ratio is the greatest is at 6 degrees and the

ratio is 122.

The airfoil boundary layer becomes turbulent at about 25% of its chord length.

If you look at the airflow from the pressure coefficient graph, you can also confirm

that the boundary layer becomes turbulent at that chord length. After it separates it

continues to flow further and further away from the airfoil. Compared to something like

alfa 9, where it stays fairly close to the airfoil and never really separates.

This is where the lift is greatest compared to drag. On the tangent line, this is the only

place where the line intersects with the graph. 0.00733 is the coefficient of drag point

attack to each other, the pressure is always causing an increasing amount of drag. Skin

friction does increase with larger angles of attack, but so does pressure at the same

time.

Conclusion

The project mainly got us familiar with xfoil and all the different tools within xfoil. I

can now easily determine skin friction, pressure coefficients, boundary layers much

easier after and understand the meaning of all the charts and graphs. In the future,

when we create our own airfoils, it will be easier to see what works the best using this

program.

Pochops notes

1) Good job, you answered the questions and wrote a well written report

2) How does changing the Reynolds number affect your data?

Grade 95%

- Fluid Dynamics on Adaptative AirfoilsUploaded byDaniel Olaya
- Afwal Tm 84 203 Prediction of Aerodynamic DragUploaded bymorganflexer
- PrinciplesOfGliderFlight-LiftDragPerformanceUploaded byKevin Tsui
- Lectures on Wind TunnelUploaded bynd1977
- wind tunnelUploaded byprannenbatra
- Lift Distribution SylviaVilledaUploaded bySylvia Damarisse Villeda
- NACA-TN-3911Uploaded byteuap
- Ch 9 Flow Over Immersed Bodies WebUploaded byAsif Rahman
- Fluid Mechanics 2Uploaded byAmmad Ud Din
- StylingUploaded bysureshgraphics
- Chapter 15Uploaded byNo Al Prian
- Janiszewska Jolanta MUploaded byapi-3800845
- Drag and lift reduction of a 3D bluff-body using active vortex.pdfUploaded byMarcusHuynh88
- analysis of angle of attack on lift forceUploaded bySiddhant Srivastava
- Objective QuestionsUploaded bySyed Sirajul Haq
- RASAero Users ManualUploaded byCRISA3000000
- 1-s2.0-S1270963813000771-main.pdfUploaded byAwan AJa
- Group-CUploaded byPRANAVI
- Project 3Uploaded byNaval Gupta
- Speed Limits on Swimming of FishesUploaded byMati Ger
- The Dynamic Study of the Weft Insertion of Air.pdfUploaded byNahid Khanna
- Cavitation Prediction of Flow over the Delft Twist 11 FoilUploaded byMNirooei
- DOC-20170529-WA0001Uploaded byAswanTajuddin
- Us 20080116717 a 1Uploaded byAbdelrahman Magdy
- MEASUREMENT OF THE DRAG COEFFICIENTS OF SPHERICAL PARTICLESUploaded bysr3sh
- Computational Investigation of the Effect of Nose Bluntness on the External and Internal Compression in a Mixed Inline IntakeUploaded byIAEME Publication
- MOF QB.docUploaded byKarnalPreeth
- A 563228Uploaded byMichael Briggs
- Proiect REI.docUploaded byNicholas Valdez
- 1Natural_convectionPaulUploaded byFelipe Arce

- evidence3inquiry1 reinerUploaded byapi-312401337
- letters of recUploaded byapi-312401337
- statement of future plansUploaded byapi-312401337
- outline proposal 1Uploaded byapi-312401337
- robotics community contributorUploaded byapi-312401337
- marble sorter projectUploaded byapi-312401337
- resumeUploaded byapi-312401337
- cover letterUploaded byapi-312401337
- the great gatsbyUploaded byapi-312401337
- inquiry232 reinerUploaded byapi-312401337
- inquiry2evidence1 reinerUploaded byapi-312401337
- inquiry2evidence2 reinerUploaded byapi-312401337
- inquiry2evidence3 reinerUploaded byapi-312401337
- evidence2inquiry1 reinerUploaded byapi-312401337
- evidence1inquiry1 reinerUploaded byapi-312401337
- inquiry1 reinerUploaded byapi-312401337

- Exp2Uploaded byAntarip Poddar
- venturi meterUploaded byChristopher Garcia
- 2011_Magnetorheological Fluids_ a ReviewUploaded byalkyrza
- Bernoulli PptUploaded byfatimahazirah
- Cavitation in Centrifugal PumpsUploaded byOmar Ahmed Elkhalil
- 44Uploaded byraza_aero2490
- FM Lecture Notes 4Uploaded byRahmad Efendi
- Colloid ChemistryUploaded byMoaz Siddig
- Nanofluid for enhanced oil recovery.pdfUploaded bydelmarciogomes6739
- CFD Simulation of Core Annular Flow Through Sudden Contraction and ExpansionUploaded byEnivaldo Barbosa
- Problem Solving Through SimilitudeUploaded byNirmal Lanka
- Best rheological Model drilling fluidsUploaded byVassilios Kelessidis
- Polymer RheologyUploaded bytflgvo123
- FoamUploaded byhamedianpur
- FMHB3-FlowmetersUploaded bytree_99
- CavitationUploaded byRudy Becks
- Thin airfoil theoryUploaded byjakub_gramol
- numerical investigation of laminar flow of a wateralumina nanofluid.pdfUploaded byAnonymous jy6m5YM
- 3040 Thickeners and Rheology GuideUploaded byajoilham
- Critical Static Gel Strength Calculation-API MethodUploaded byAbrarhassan
- 002-FLOW+IN+PIPEUploaded byRahim Genesis
- Csb 30103 Chap 3Uploaded byMuhammad Hariz
- Chapter 1 BFC34402Uploaded bydatonizam
- PART-I GWH-3Uploaded bytej pratap
- Oil-water Design Installation & OperationUploaded bydsahmed
- AAWahab2006_EstimatingVerticalDragonHelicopterUploaded byPeter Ijaramendi
- 216453915-Lab-OrificeUploaded bymark
- An study on Kort and proppellerUploaded byLong Nguyen
- SCRIPT MC-Quary Art Tastic (Revised)Uploaded bybeybond
- CavitationUploaded byvenkeeku