2016

NQI SURABAYA
Polygon SBY01
September 2016

[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the
document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the
contents of the document.]
 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

1 Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 5

2. CET Result & Verification.................................................................................................................. 7
2.1 CET Optimization Activities .............................................................................................................. 8
2.1.1 CET Spot Excelso Kertajaya .................................................................................................... 8
2.1.2 CET Spot Kampus Unair B ....................................................................................................... 9
2.1.3 CET Spot Universitas 17 Agustus ......................................................................................... 10
2.1.4 CET Spot Lotte Mart Ngagel .................................................................................................. 11
2.1.5 CET Spot Raya Kertajaya ....................................................................................................... 12
2.2 CET Justification............................................................................................................................... 12
3. Drive Test KPI Result ...................................................................................................................... 13
2G Rx Level............................................................................................................................................... 14
3G RSCP ................................................................................................................................................... 14
4G RSRP ................................................................................................................................................... 15
2G Speech Quality Index (SQI).............................................................................................................. 15
2G Rx Qual................................................................................................................................................ 16
3G EcNo .................................................................................................................................................... 16
4G SINR .................................................................................................................................................... 17
3G Downlink CS Bler ............................................................................................................................... 17
3G Downlink PS Bler ............................................................................................................................... 18
3G DL Throughput ................................................................................................................................... 18
4G PDCP DL Throughput ....................................................................................................................... 19
4G PDCP UL Throughput ....................................................................................................................... 19
3.1 Bad Spot Optimization ..................................................................................................................... 20
3.1.1 Bad Spot Optimization 1 ......................................................................................................... 20
3.1.2 Bad Spot Optimization 2 ......................................................................................................... 21
3.1.3 Bad Spot Optimization 3 ......................................................................................................... 22
3.1.4 Bad Spot Optimization 4 ......................................................................................................... 23
3.2 Bad Spot Justification ...................................................................................................................... 24
3.2.1 2G RxLevel Bad Spot Justification ........................................................................................ 24

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 2

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.2.2 3G RSCP Bad Spot Justification............................................................................................ 25

3.2.3 3G EcNo Bad Spot Justification ............................................................................................. 26
3.2.4 3G BLER PS Bad Spot Justification ...................................................................................... 27
3.2.5 4G RSRP Bad Spot Justification............................................................................................ 28
3.2.6 4G SINR Bad Spot Justification ............................................................................................. 29
3.2.7 4G DL Throughput Bad Spot Justification ............................................................................ 30

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. 4G User Throughput Experience improvement at spot Excelso Kertajaya ...................... 8

Figure 2. 4G User Throughput Experience improvement at spot Kampus Unair B ......................... 9
Figure 3. 4G User Throughput Experience improvement at spot UNTAG ...................................... 10
Figure 4. 4G User Throughput Experience improvement at spot Lotte Mart .................................. 11
Figure 5. 4G User Throughput Experience improvement at spot Raya Kertajaya ......................... 12
Figure 6. 2G Rx Level (dBm) Idle Mode ............................................................................................ 14
Figure 7. 3G RSCP (dBm) Dedicated Mode ..................................................................................... 14
Figure 8. 4G RSRP (dBm) Dedicated Mode ..................................................................................... 15
Figure 9. 2G SQI Dedicated Mode ..................................................................................................... 15
Figure 10. 2G Rx Qual (dB) Dediated Mode .................................................................................... 16
Figure 11. 3G EcNo (db) Dedicated Mode........................................................................................ 16
Figure 12. 4G SINR (db) Dedicataed Mode...................................................................................... 17
Figure 13. 3G Downlink CS Bler ............................................................................................................ 17
Figure 14. 3G Downlink PS Bler ............................................................................................................ 18
Figure 15. 3G HSDPA Troughput (kbps) .............................................................................................. 18
Figure 16. 4G PDCP DL Troughput (kbps) .......................................................................................... 19
Figure 17. 4G PDCP ULTroughput (kbps) ........................................................................................... 19
Figure 18. Coverage Improvement area Kodam Wonokromo ....................................................... 20
Figure 19. Coverage Improvement area Manyar Menur Pumpungan .......................................... 21
Figure 20. Coverage Improvement area Kertajaya Indah.................................................................. 22
Figure 21. Coverage Improvement area MERR Semampir............................................................... 23
Figure 22. 2G RxLevel Bad Spot ........................................................................................................... 24
Figure 23. 3G RSCP Bad Spot .............................................................................................................. 25

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 3

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

Figure 24. 3G EcNo Bad Spot ................................................................................................................ 26

Figure 25. 3G BLER PS Bad Spot......................................................................................................... 27
Figure 26. 4G RSRP Bad Spot .............................................................................................................. 28
Figure 27. 4G SINR Bad Spot ................................................................................................................ 29
Figure 28. 4G DL Throughput Bad Spot ............................................................................................... 30

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. CET Target .................................................................................................................................. 5
Table 2. Drive Test KPI Target Design ................................................................................................... 6
Table 3. CET Result SBY-1 ...................................................................................................................... 7
Table 4. CET Spot Excelso Kertajaya Optimization Activities............................................................. 8
Table 5. CET Spot Kampus Unair B Optimization Activities ............................................................... 9
Table 6. CET Spot UNTAG Optimization Activities ............................................................................ 10
Table 7. CET Spot Lotte Mart Ngagel Optimization Activities ........................................................... 11
Table 8. CET Spot Raya Kertajaya Optimization Activities ............................................................... 12
Table 9. DT Result SBY-1....................................................................................................................... 13
Table 10. Optimization Activities area Kodam Wonokromo ........................................................... 20
Table 11. Optimization Activities area Manyar Menur Pumpungan .............................................. 21
Table 12. Optimization Activities area Kertajaya Indah ...................................................................... 22
Table 13. Optimization Activities area MERR Semampir................................................................... 23
Table 14. 2G RxLevel Bad Spot Justification Remark ....................................................................... 24
Table 15. 3G RSCP Bad Spot Justification Remark ........................................................................... 25
Table 16. 3G EcNo Bad Spot Justification Remark ............................................................................ 26
Table 17. 3G BLER PS Bad Spot Justification Remark ..................................................................... 27
Table 18. 4G RSRP Bad Spot Justification Remark ........................................................................... 28
Table 19. 4G SINR Bad Spot Justification Remark ............................................................................ 29
Table 20. 4G DL Throughput Bad Spot Justification Remark ........................................................... 30

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 4

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

1. Executive Summary
Huawei has been delivered E2E Network Quality Improvement Project in Surabaya region consist of
3 polygon belongs to Huawei (HTI).
During optimization period, there were a lot of activities that had been carried out to improve the
network performance. There are 2 Classification KPIs to be optimized, CET Result and Drive Test
Result.

Customer Experience Test

Technology Test Parameter Target

XL to XL number call test clear & no robotic

XL to others number call test* clear & no robotic
SMS On Net 1 drop of 10
2G
SMS Off Net 1 drop of 10
XL Signal Strength (dBm) info
Check Balance* 7s
Data DL speedtest using most used Handsets 1.2 Mbps
Instant Message test 3s tick send
Smartphone Internet browsing (detik.com) 7s
Smartphone Internet browsing (Google) 7s
Smartphone Internet browsing (Facebook) 7s
Smartphone Internet browsing (123.co.id) 7s
3G Video Streaming (Youtube) no buffering
XL to XL number R99 AMR call test clear & no robotic
XL to others number R99 AMR call test* clear & no robotic
SMS On Net 1 drop of 10
SMS Off Net 1 drop of 10
XL Signal Strength (dBm) info
Check Balance* 7s
Data DL speedtest using most used Handsets 20 Mbps
Instant Message test 3s tick send
Smartphone Internet browsing (detik.com) 5s
Smartphone Internet browsing (Google) 5s
Smartphone Internet browsing (Facebook) 5s
4G
Smartphone Internet browsing (123.co.id) 5s
Video Streaming (Youtube) no buffering
CSFB Call setup time (MOC) Ringing Tone 7s
CSFB Call Success rate (MOC) 1 drop of 10
XL Signal Strength (dBm) info

Table 1. CET Target

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 5

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

Drive Test KPI

No KPI Item Tech Target

1 Call Setup success rate (Speech Call 2G only) 2G >98%
2 Call setup time 2G 6s
3 Packet Drop Ratio (PDP Context - GPRS) 2G <1%
4 Call Drop Rate (2G) 2G <=1.3%
5 Receiving Level (Rx Lev >= -85 dbm) 2G >= -85dBm, area 90%
6 Receiving Quality (Rx Qual >= 4) 2G >85%
7 Receiving SQI 2G SQI >=18, area 80%
8 Handover Success Rate (2G to 2G) 2G >96%
9 Call Setup success rate (Speech Call 3G only) 3G only >97%
10 Call Setup success rate (Speech Call 3G - 2G) 3G Prefered >98%
11 PS HS Speed >=1 Mbps 3G 1000 Kbps
12 Call setup time 3G <6s
13 3G
Packet Drop Ratio (R99)+Packet Drop Ratio (HSUPA+) <1%
14 3G
15 Call Drop Rate (3G) 3G <1.8%
16 Receiving Level (RSCP >= -85 dbm) 3G >=90% of Area*, depend on network design
17 Receiving Quality (Ec/No >= -14) 3G >=90% of Area*
18 BLER CS 3G 1% of 90% of area
19 BLER PS 3G 10% of 90% of Area
20 Hard Handover Success Rate (3G to 3G) 3G >98%
21 IRAT Handover Success Rate (3G to 2G) 3G Prefered >98%
22 Speech Access Success Rate (Speech Access Rate) 3G Prefered >98%
23 PS Access Success Rate (PS Access Rate) 3G >98%
24 Speech Drop Rate (CS RAB Drop Rate) 3G <1%
25 PS Drop Rate (PS RAB Drop Rate) 3G <1%
26 Soft Handover Success Rate (3G to 3G) 3G >99%
RSRP > -115 dBm > 95% area on the
27 RSRP > -85 dBm in 90% polygon 4G
cluster,depend on network design
28 SINR > 12 in 90% polygon 4G SINR Plot >= 0 > 90% area on the cluster
29 Jitter (Uplink and Downlink) 4G <50ms
30 Session Abnormal Release Rate 4G <1.4%
31 Session Setup Success Rate 4G >99%
32 RRC Setup Success Rate 4G >98%
33 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Time 4G <=3.5s
34 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Success Rate 4G >97%
35 Voice - Return to LTE Success Rate 4G >97%
36 CS Fall Back Success Rate 4G >97%
37 CS Fall Back Return Time 4G <=5s
38 CS Fall Back Setup Time 4G <=3.5s
39 Handover Success Rate Intra-Frequency 4G 98%
40 Handover Success Rate Inter-RAT 4G 95%
41 Inter frequency HO LTE 4G 98%

Table 2. Drive Test KPI Target Design

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 6

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

Following activities have been proposed and executed during optimization period :

Hardware troubleshooting
Physical tuning including antenna down tilting and change of orientation
Bad spot improvement based on Drive Test
Parameter optimization
Audit neighbor list
New site integration (LTE)

2. CET Result & Verification

Table below shows the Customer Experience Test compared to Baseline.

Table 3. CET Result SBY-1

Customer Experience Test Acceptance has been conducted and signed by XL AM and RSM Sales
(as attached).

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 7

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

2.1 CET Optimization Activities

Optimization has been carried to improve user experience in CET spots. Below are optimization
activities that have been done for 5 CET spot samples in SBY-1.

2.1.1 CET Spot Excelso Kertajaya

4G user experience has been improved for CET spot Excelso Kertajaya.
Issue Description Solution Result
Physical tuning
- SINR improved
Pollutant from PCI 50 from M 3/2/2 E4G 6/6/6
Poor SINR - Throughput user experience improved
4541521E_LTE_KEPUTRAN to M 2/2/2 E4G 8/6/6
(speedtest)
(height 29~31m)
Feature activation
DL Throughput Dynamic Scheduling feature - RBG Resource Allocation Strategy
DL Throughput improved
improvement alignment (Adaptive)
- Smart Pre-allocation

Table 4. CET Spot Excelso Kertajaya Optimization Activities

Figure 1. 4G User Throughput Experience improvement at spot Excelso Kertajaya

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 8

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

2.1.2 CET Spot Kampus Unair B

4G user experience has been improved for CET spot Kampus Unair B.
Issue Description Solution Result
Physical tuning
- SINR improved
Pollutant from PCI 25, 26 from M 4/2/5
Poor SINR - Throughput user experience improved
4541571E_LTE_UNAIR to M 6/8/6
(speedtest)
(height 21~23m)
Feature activation
DL Throughput Dynamic Scheduling feature - RBG Resource Allocation Strategy
DL Throughput improved
improvement alignment (Adaptive)
- Smart Pre-allocation

Table 5. CET Spot Kampus Unair B Optimization Activities

Figure 2. 4G User Throughput Experience improvement at spot Kampus Unair B

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 9

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

2.1.3 CET Spot Universitas 17 Agustus

4G user experience has been improved for CET spot UNTAG.
Issue Description Solution Result
Physical tuning
Need to improve coverage dominance redirection az 60/210/330 to 60/210/300 - SINR improved
Sidelobe coverage
from from M 2/2/2 E 2/6/2 - Throughput user experience
from best server
4541854E_LTE_MENUR_PUMPUNGAN to M 2/2/2 E 6/6/6 improved (speedtest)
(height 24~27m)
Feature activation
DL Throughput - RBG Resource Allocation Strategy
Dynamic Scheduling feature alignment DL Throughput improved
improvement (Adaptive)
- Smart Pre-allocation

Table 6. CET Spot UNTAG Optimization Activities

Figure 3. 4G User Throughput Experience improvement at spot UNTAG

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 10

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

2.1.4 CET Spot Lotte Mart Ngagel

3G user experience has been improved for CET spot Lotte Mart.
Issue Description Solution Result
Parameter tuning at
354PC543G_MARVEL_CITY_SURABAYA
Poor 3G user Network Communication Issue indication by HSDPA user
- admission parameter (Add 2nd SCCPCH)
experience Ookla speedtest experience improved
- uplink feature activation
- background noise nodeB parameter
Poor 4G New IBS 4G (colo
No indoor coverage Proposed (pending)
coverage 354PC543G_MARVEL_CITY_SURABAYA)

Table 7. CET Spot Lotte Mart Ngagel Optimization Activities

Figure 4. 4G User Throughput Experience improvement at spot Lotte Mart

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 11

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

2.1.5 CET Spot Raya Kertajaya

4G user experience has been improved for CET spot Raya Kertajaya.
Issue Description Solution Result
Physical tuning
Need to improve coverage dominance - SINR improved
Sidelobe coverage from M 2/4/1 E 5/6/6
from - Throughput user experience
from best server to M 2/2/2 E 6/4/8
4544337E_LTE_MANYAR_SAMBONGAN improved (speedtest)
(height 24m)
Feature activation
DL Throughput - RBG Resource Allocation Strategy
Dynamic Scheduling feature alignment DL Throughput improved
improvement (Adaptive)
- Smart Pre-allocation

Table 8. CET Spot Raya Kertajaya Optimization Activities

Figure 5. 4G User Throughput Experience improvement at spot Raya Kertajaya

2.2 CET Justification

As attached.

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 12

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3. Drive Test KPI Result

Below are Drive Test results for Polygon SBY01.
Baseline Surabaya After Surabaya
No KPI Item Tech Target
SBY 1 SBY 1
1 Call Setup success rate (Speech Call 2G only) 2G >98% 98.56% 99.06%
2 Call setup time 2G 6s 4.90 4.015
3 Packet Drop Ratio (PDP Context - GPRS) 2G <1% 0% 0.00%
4 Call Drop Rate (2G) 2G <=1.3% 0% 0.00%
5 Receiving Level (Rx Lev >= -85 dbm) 2G >= -85dBm, area 90% 98.89% 95.68%
6 Receiving Quality (Rx Qual >= 4) 2G >85% 75.19% 85.65%
7 Receiving SQI 2G SQI >=18, area 80% 81.95% 94.17%
8 Handover Success Rate (2G to 2G) 2G >96% 95.60% 99.94%
9 Call Setup success rate (Speech Call 3G only) 3G only >97% 97.99% 98.60%
10 Call Setup success rate (Speech Call 3G - 2G) 3G Prefered >98% 93.94% 98.63%
11 PS HS Speed >=1 Mbps 3G 1000 Kbps 1648.89 2383.25
12 Call setup time 3G <6s 4.799 2.931
13 3G 0.00% 0.00%
Packet Drop Ratio (R99)+Packet Drop Ratio (HSUPA+) <1%
14 3G 3.13% 1.11%
15 Call Drop Rate (3G) 3G <1.8% 0.53% 1.33%
16 Receiving Level (RSCP >= -85 dbm) 3G >=90% of Area*, depend on network design 95.64% 94.05%
17 Receiving Quality (Ec/No >= -14) 3G >=90% of Area* 95.56% 95.36%
18 BLER CS 3G 1% of 90% of area 97.88% 97.62%
19 BLER PS 3G 10% of 90% of Area 72.27% 80.20%
20 Hard Handover Success Rate (3G to 3G) 3G >98% 95.00% 99.14%
21 IRAT Handover Success Rate (3G to 2G) 3G Prefered >98% 100.00% 100.00%
22 Speech Access Success Rate (Speech Access Rate) 3G Prefered >98% 97.99% 98.63%
23 PS Access Success Rate (PS Access Rate) 3G >98% 70.27% 97.99%
24 Speech Drop Rate (CS RAB Drop Rate) 3G <1% 0.53% 1.33%
25 PS Drop Rate (PS RAB Drop Rate) 3G <1% 0.00% 0.87%
26 Soft Handover Success Rate (3G to 3G) 3G >99% 80.45% 99.96%
RSRP > -115 dBm > 95% area on the
27 RSRP > -85 dBm in 90% polygon 4G 99.99% 99.97%
cluster,depend on network design
28 SINR > 12 in 90% polygon 4G SINR Plot >= 0 > 90% area on the cluster 95.45% 95.79%
29 Jitter (Uplink and Downlink) 4G <50ms 7.600 9.663
30 Session Abnormal Release Rate 4G <1.4% 0.03% 0.00%
31 Session Setup Success Rate 4G >99% 100.00% 100%
32 RRC Setup Success Rate 4G >98% 100.00% 100%
33 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Time 4G <=3.5s 2.60 2.81
34 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Success Rate 4G >97% 88.68% 100%
35 Voice - Return to LTE Success Rate 4G >97% 91.45% 99.16%
36 CS Fall Back Success Rate 4G >97% 80.61% 100.00%
37 CS Fall Back Return Time 4G <=5s 3.89 3.37
38 CS Fall Back Setup Time 4G <=3.5s 2.39 1.71
39 Handover Success Rate Intra-Frequency 4G 98% 99.84% 99.92%
40 Handover Success Rate Inter-RAT 4G 95% - -
41 Inter frequency HO LTE 4G 98% - -

Table 9. DT Result SBY-1

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 13

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

2G Rx Level

BAND Level (dBm) COLOUR BASELINE AFTER - 2G Signal Strenght (-85) is Degrade from 98.89 % to 95.68
75 dBm 91.22% 81.82% %,Pass from target
-85 - -75 7.67% 13.86%
2G -95 - -85 1.05% 4.08%
-95 0.06% 0.24%
RxLevel -85 98.89% 95.68%

Figure 6. 2G Rx Level (dBm) Idle Mode

3G RSCP

BAND Level (dBm) COLOUR BASELINE AFTER - 3G Signal Strenght (-85) is Degrade from 95.64 % to 94.06
75 dBm 72.38% 72.48% %,Pass from target
-85 - -75 23.26% 21.58%
3G -95 - -85 4.25% 5.43%
-95 0.11% 0.52%
RSCP -85 95.64% 94.06%

Figure 7. 3G RSCP (dBm) Dedicated Mode

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 14

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

4G RSRP

Mode Range (kbps) Colour BASELINE AFTER 4G Signal Strenght (-115) is Maintain from 99.99 % to 99.97 %,
85 dBm 50.61% 59.91% Pass from target
-90 to -85 19.86% 16.26%
-100 to -90 24.46% 19.28%
4G -110 to -100 4.93% 4.38%
-115 to -110 0.13% 0.14%
-115 0.00% 0.03%
RSRP >= -115 99.99% 99.98%

Figure 8. 4G RSRP (dBm) Dedicated Mode

2G Speech Quality Index (SQI)

BAND Level (dBm) COLOUR BASELINE AFTER - 2G Network Quality (SQI) is improve from 81.95 % to 94.17 %
18 - 30 81.95% 94.17%
2G 0 - 18 15.90% 5.73%
<0 2.15% 0.11%

Figure 9. 2G SQI Dedicated Mode

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 15

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

2G Rx Qual

BAND Level (dBm) COLOUR BASELINE AFTER - 2G Network Quality (SQI) is improve from 75.19 % to 85.69 %
>= 0 to < 4 75.19% 85.69%
2G >= 4 to < 7 21.33% 13.81%
>= 7 to < 9 3.48% 0.50%

Figure 10. 2G Rx Qual (dB) Dediated Mode

3G EcNo

BAND Level (dBm) COLOUR BASELINE AFTER - 3G Signal Quality (-14) is Maintain from 95.56 % to 95.35 %,
10 dBm 66.77% 63.64% Pass from target
-14 - -10 28.79% 31.71%
3G -18 - -14 3.71% 4.21%
-18 0.73% 0.44%
EcNo -14 95.56% 95.35%

Figure 11. 3G EcNo (db) Dedicated Mode

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 16

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

4G SINR

Mode Range (kbps) Colour BASELINE AFTER 4G Network Qaulity ( 0) is Maintain from 95.45 % to 95.79 %
20 dBm 12.58% 21.35%
10 to 20 44.35% 42.87%
5 to 10 25.24% 19.90%
4G 0 to 5 13.28% 11.68%
-5 to 0 0.0404 3.76%
-5 0.51% 0.45%
SINR >= 0 95.45% 95.79%

Figure 12. 4G SINR (db) Dedicataed Mode

3G Downlink CS Bler

BAND Level (dBm) COLOUR BASELINE AFTER Bler CS ( 1) is Maintain from 99.22 % to 99.71 %,Improve from traget
>= 50 to < 100 0.01% 0.02%
>= 10 to < 50 0.09% 0.05%
Downlink
>= 1 to < 10 0.11% 2.32%
Bler CS
>= 0 to < 1 99.78% 97.62%
Bler CS >= 1 99.78% 97.62%

Figure 13. 3G Downlink CS Bler

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 17

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3G Downlink PS Bler

Mode Range (kbps) Colour BASELINE AFTER DL PS Bler ( 10 ) is Degrade from 83.97% to 80.21% Not improve
from target
30 to < 100 9.18% 9.95%
,
25 to < 30 0.99% 1.44%
20 to < 25 1.36% 1.60%
DownlinkB 15 to < 20 1.59% 2.00%
ler PS 10 to < 15 2.90% 4.81%
10 to < 5 3.12% 4.39%
0 to < 5 80.85% 75.82%
DL PS Bler > 10 83.97% 80.21%

Figure 14. 3G Downlink PS Bler

3G DL Throughput

Mode Range (kbps) Colour BASELINE AFTER 3G HSDPA Average Throughput (1000 Kbps ) is improve from
1648.89 Kbps to 2383.25 Kbps
>= 1024 55.34% 69.55%
768 to 1024 9.25% 5.14%
512 to <768 8.12% 5.06%
3G DL 256 to 512 6.93% 4.15%
128 to 256 2.85% 2.00%
< 128 17.51% 14.09%
Average 1648. 2383.25

Figure 15. 3G HSDPA Troughput (kbps)

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 18

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

4G PDCP DL Throughput

Mode Range (kbps) Colour BASELINE AFTER 4G Average PDCP DL Throughput ( Info Only ) is improve from
30000 3.56% 22.49% 9050.26 Kbps to 21727.27 Kbps
20000 to 30000 7.16% 20.71%
10000 to 20000 19.83% 28.31%
4G DL
5000 to 10000 27.01% 13.52%
5000 42.45% 14.96%
Average 9050.26 21727.27

Figure 16. 4G PDCP DL Troughput (kbps)

4G PDCP UL Throughput

Mode Range (kbps) Colour BASELINE AFTER 4G Average PDCP UL Throughput ( Info Only ) is improve from 10975.71
15000 26.76% 51.93% Kbps to 14207.4 Kbps
10000 to 15000 11.35% 21.17%
5000 to 10000 31.46% 10.90%
4G UL
2000 to 5000 11.50% 3.00%
2000 18.90% 13.00%
Average 10975.71 14207.4

Figure 17. 4G PDCP ULTroughput (kbps)

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 19

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.1 Bad Spot Optimization

Optimization has been carried out to improve coverage quality. Below are the samples of bad
spot improvement in polygon SBY-1.

3.1.1 Bad Spot Optimization 1

Optimization has been carried out to improve coverage in area of Kodam Wonokromo.
RSRP Before RSRP After
Before After
eNodeBNa me Hei ght
Di r Mech El ec Di r Mech El ec
4541526E_LTE_WONOKROMO 30 90 2 6 90 2 8
4541526E_LTE_WONOKROMO 30 210 2 6 210 2 8
4541526E_LTE_WONOKROMO 30 330 2 6 330 2 8
454C903E_LTE_KODAM_BRAWIJAYA 30 60 2 3 60 2 6
454C903E_LTE_KODAM_BRAWIJAYA 30 210 2 3 210 2 6
454C903E_LTE_KODAM_BRAWIJAYA 30 300 2 3 300 2 6
MC4544345E_LTE_GAJAH_MADA_SURABAYA 16 90 0 RET/40 120 2 RET/20
MC4544345E_LTE_GAJAH_MADA_SURABAYA 16 210 0 RET/40 210 2 RET/20
MC4544345E_LTE_GAJAH_MADA_SURABAYA 16 320 0 RET/40 320 2 RET/20

Site Covered :
MC454C524E_LTE_KARANGREJO_WONOKROMO,MC454
C502E_LTE_JOYOBOYO_SURABAYA and
SINR Before SINR After 4541526E_LTE_WONOKROMO
Detail Analysis:
Bad RSRP and SINR on the area due to have overshoot
from site 454C903E_LTE_KODAM_BRAWIJAYA Sec 1 and
4541526E_LTE_WONOKROMO Sec 2
Optimization Done:
downtlit 454C903E_LTE_KODAM_BRAWIJAYA Sec 1 E3 to
E6 and 4541526E_LTE_WONOKROMO Sec 2 E6 to E8
Uptilt site
MC454C524E_LTE_KARANGREJO_WONOKROMO sec 3
from E8 to E6
new site LTE colo site
MC3544345G_3G_GAJAH_MADA_SBY (OA)

Figure 18. Coverage Improvement area Kodam Wonokromo

Issue Description Solution Result

Physical tuning
- 454C903E_LTE_KODAM_BRAWIJAYA
sector 1, from E 3 to E 6
Overshoot from
- 4541526E_LTE_WONOKROMO sector 2,
454C903E_LTE_KODAM_BRAWIJAYA
Poor RSRP & SINR from E 6 to E 8 RSRP & SINR improved
sector 1 and
- MC454C524E_LTE_KARANGREJO
4541526E_LTE_WONOKROMO sec2
WONOKROMO sector 3, from E 8 to E 6
- new site MC4544345E_LTE
GAJAH_MADA_SURABAYA
Feature activation
DL Throughput - RBG Resource Allocation Strategy
Dynamic Scheduling feature alignment DL Throughput improved
improvement (Adaptive)
- Smart Pre-allocation

Table 10. Optimization Activities area Kodam Wonokromo

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 20

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.1.2 Bad Spot Optimization 2

Optimization has been carried out to improve coverage in area of Manyar Menur Pumpungan.
SINR Before SINR After
Be fore Afte r
e Node BNa me He i ght
Di r Me ch El e c Di r Me ch El e c
4544336E_LTE_MANYAR_SABRANGAN 29 100 2 6 120 2 8
4544336E_LTE_MANYAR_SABRANGAN 29 200 2 6 210 2 8
4544336E_LTE_MANYAR_SABRANGAN 29 330 2 6 330 2 8
4541805E_LTE_PUCANGSEWU_SURABAYA 12+18 130 2 3 60 2 6
4541805E_LTE_PUCANGSEWU_SURABAYA 12+18 210 2 3 210 2 6
4541805E_LTE_PUCANGSEWU_SURABAYA 12+18 330 2 3 300 2 6

Site Covered :
4544336E_LTE_MANYAR_SABRANGAN
And 4541805E_LTE_PUCANGSEWU_SURABAYA
Detail Analysis:
RSRP Before RSRP After Bad SINR on the area due to no dominant site
serving
Optimization Done:
downtilt site
4544336E_LTE_MANYAR_SABRANGAN sec 1 from
E6 to E 8 and re azimuth 90 to 130
and site audit
4541805E_LTE_PUCANGSEWU_SURABAYA sec 1
from E2 to E6

Figure 19. Coverage Improvement area Manyar Menur Pumpungan

Issue Description Solution Result

Physical tuning
No Dominant site serving by
- MC454C504E_LTE_MANYAR_SABRANGAN sector 1, re
Poor MC454C504E_LTE_MANYAR_SABRANGAN
azimuth from 90 to 130 and from E 6 to E 8 SINR improved
SINR &
- 4541805E_LTE_PUCANGSEWU SURABAYA sector 1,
4541805E_LTE_PUCANGSEWU_SURABAYA
from E 2 to E 6

Table 11. Optimization Activities area Manyar Menur Pumpungan

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 21

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.1.3 Bad Spot Optimization 3

Optimization has been carried out to improve coverage in area of Kertajaya Indah.

RSCP Before RSCP After

Site Covered :
3541548G_3G_MEDOKAN,3544340G_3G_SEM
AMPIR_INDAH,3542833G_3G_RAYA_KEDUNG_
BARUK

Detail Analysis:
Bad EcNo due to missing neighbor from site
3541548G_3G_MEDOKAN Sec 1 to
3544340G_3G_SEMAMPIR_INDAH sec 3 and
3542833G_3G_RAYA_KEDUNG_BARUK Sec 1

Optimization Done:
EcNo Before EcNo After Audit neighbor site 3541548G_3G_MEDOKAN.
Done add relation from Sec 1 to
3544340G_3G_SEMAMPIR_INDAH sec 3 and
3542833G_3G_RAYA_KEDUNG_BARUK Sec 1

Figure 20. Coverage Improvement area Kertajaya Indah

Issue Description Solution Result

Poor Ec/No due to missing neighbor from site
3541548G_3G_MEDOKAN Sec1 to
Poor Ec/No
3544340G_3G_SEMAMPIR_INDAH sec3 and
3542833G_3G_RAYA_KEDUNG_BARUK Sec1
Audit neighbor site 3541548G_3G_MEDOKAN.
Add relation from Sec1 to
Ec/No improved
3544340G_3G_SEMAMPIR_INDAH sec3
and 3542833G_3G_RAYA_KEDUNG_BARUK Sec1

Table 12. Optimization Activities area Kertajaya Indah

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 22

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.1.4 Bad Spot Optimization 4

Optimization has been carried out to improve coverage in area of MERR Semampir.

RSCP Before RSCP After

Before After
NWName Height
Dir Mech Elec Dir Mech Elec
MC354C540G_3G_KERTAJAYA_INDAH_SURABAYA 23 90 2 3 120 2 6
MC354C540G_3G_KERTAJAYA_INDAH_SURABAYA 23 210 2 3 210 2 6
MC354C540G_3G_KERTAJAYA_INDAH_SURABAYA 23 330 2 3 330 2 6
3544335G_3G_MANYAR_KERTOADI 37 125 2 5 60 2 6
3544335G_3G_MANYAR_KERTOADI 37 250 2 1 210 2 8
3544335G_3G_MANYAR_KERTOADI 37 325 2 4 300 2 6

Site Covered :
MC354C540G_3G_KERTAJAYA_INDAH_SURABAYA
Detail Analysis:
EcNo After Bad RSCP and EcNo due no dominant serving from
EcNo Before nearest site
MC354C540G_3G_KERTAJAYA_INDAH_SURABAYA
sec 3, and
SH354C728G_3G_BTS_HOTEL_KERTAJAYA_INDAH,
overshooting from
3544335G_3G_MANYAR_KERTOADI sec 3
Optimization Done:
Downtilt
MC354C540G_3G_KERTAJAYA_INDAH_SURABAYA
sec 3 from E3 to E6 and
3544335G_3G_MANYAR_KERTOADI sec 3 from E4 to
E6

Figure 21. Coverage Improvement area MERR Semampir

Issue Description Solution Result

Physical Tuning
Poor RSCP and Ec/No due no dominant serving from
Poor MC354C540G_3G_KERTAJAYA_INDAH_SURABAYA
nearest site
RSCP & sec3 from E3 to E6 RSCP & Ec/No improved
MC354C540G_3G_KERTAJAYA_INDAH_SURABAYA
Ec/No 3544335G_3G_MANYAR_KERTOADI sec3 from E4 to
sec3 & 3544335G_3G_MANYAR_KERTOADI sec3
E6

Table 13. Optimization Activities area MERR Semampir

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 23

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.2 Bad Spot Justification

Several bad spots are highlighted with justifications as follow.

3.2.1 2G RxLevel Bad Spot Justification

Figure 22. 2G RxLevel Bad Spot

No Root Cause Proposed Solution

Rx Level degrade serving by
Improve coverage dominance from MC254C524_KarangrejoWonokromo sec3
1. MC2544345_Jl.GajahMada sec1 (shadowing from building
(waiting for final pentaband antenna)
obstacle) & MC254C524_KarangrejoWonokromo sec3
Coverage shaping at 2542826_ManyarIm3 sec3 (waiting for final pentaband
2. Coverage overshoot from 2542826_ManyarIm3 sec3
antenna)
No dominant serving by 2544340_SMPRIDH &
3. Pending physical tuning/audit at site 2544340_SMPRIDH 2544339_MDKNSE
2544339_MDKNSE

Table 14. 2G RxLevel Bad Spot Justification Remark

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 24

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.2.2 3G RSCP Bad Spot Justification

Figure 23. 3G RSCP Bad Spot

No Root Cause Proposed Solution

Poor RSCP serving from
1. MC354C556G_3G_GUBENG_KERTAJAYA due to service Follow up for alarm TS
impacting alarm during DT (SCTP Link Fault)
Poor RSCP serving from Propose antenna redesign (adjust height) at
2.
3541565G_3G_MANYAR_KERTOARJO due to building obstacle 3541565G_3G_MANYAR_KERTOARJO
Poor RSCP serving from 3541510G_3G_KLAMPIS_(RELOC)
3, 4 due to service impacting alarm during DT (alarm Rectifier High Follow up for alarm TS
Voltage/Rectifier Failure)
Poor RSCP serving from 3541855G_3G_SEMOLOWARU due to
5, 6, 7 Follow up for alarm TS
service impacting alarm during DT (SCTP Link Fault)

Table 15. 3G RSCP Bad Spot Justification Remark

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 25

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.2.3 3G EcNo Bad Spot Justification

Figure 24. 3G EcNo Bad Spot

No Root Cause Proposed Solution

Poor Ec/No due to poor coverage serving from
1. MC354C556G_3G_GUBENG_KERTAJAYA; Has service impacting Follow up for TS
alarm during DT (SCTP Link Fault);
Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from site Coverage shaping at 3541526G_3G_WONOKROMO (waiting for final
2.
3541526G_3G_WONOKROMO pentaband antenna)
Poor Ec/No due to poor coverage serving from
3. MC3544347G_3G_JETIS_KULON_SURABAYA caused by building Propose newsite at alfa-mart location (Long, Lat)
obstacle

Table 16. 3G EcNo Bad Spot Justification Remark

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 26

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.2.4 3G BLER PS Bad Spot Justification

Figure 25. 3G BLER PS Bad Spot

No Root Cause Proposed Solution

Poor Bler caused by poor RSCP & Ec/No serving from
1. 3541510G_3G_KLAMPIS_(RELOC); Has service impacting alarm during DT (alarm Follow up for TS
Rectifier High Voltage/Rectifier Failure);
Poor Bler caused by poor RSCP & Ec/No serving from 3541855G_3G_SEMOLOWARU;
2. Follow up for TS
Has service impacting alarm during DT (SCTP Link Fault);

Table 17. 3G BLER PS Bad Spot Justification Remark

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 27

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.2.5 4G RSRP Bad Spot Justification

Figure 26. 4G RSRP Bad Spot

No Root Cause Proposed Solution

1. No dominant serving at grid location Speed Up OA Newsite LTE colo MC354C526G_3G_MANYAR_KARTIKA

Table 18. 4G RSRP Bad Spot Justification Remark

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 28

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.2.6 4G SINR Bad Spot Justification

Figure 27. 4G SINR Bad Spot

No Root Cause Proposed Solution

1. No dominant serving at grid location Speed Up OA Newsite LTE colo MC354C526G_3G_MANYAR_KARTIKA
SINR degrade by serving cell
- Pico to macro from 454PC736E_LTE_DARMOTCEN with 330 deg bearing
MC454C502E_LTE_JOYOBOYO_SURABAYA sec1 (building
2. - Improve coverage dominance from MC254C524_KarangrejoWonokromo
obstacle) & MC454C524E_LTE_KARANGREJO_WONOKROMO
sec1 (waiting for final pentaband antenna)
sec1
- No dominant serving from
- Propose antenna redesign (adjust height) at
4544337E_LTE_MANYAR_SAMBONGAN sec1 &
3541565G_3G_MANYAR_KERTOARJO
MC454C504E_LTE_MANYAR_SABRANGAN sec2 (pollutant)
3. - Improve coverage dominance from
- SINR degrade by serving cell
4544337E_LTE_MANYAR_SAMBONGAN sec1 (waiting for final pentaband
4541565E_LTE_MANYAR_KERTOARJO sec2 (building
antenna)
obstacle)
4. No dominant serving at grid location Speed Up OA Newsite LTE colo 354C589G_3G_KEPUTRAN_SURABAYA

Table 19. 4G SINR Bad Spot Justification Remark

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 29

 [NQI SURABAYA POLYGON SBY01_ ACCEPTANCE REPORT]

3.2.7 4G DL Throughput Bad Spot Justification

Figure 28. 4G DL Throughput Bad Spot

No Root Cause Proposed Solution

- Pico to macro from 454PC736E_LTE_DARMOTCEN with
Low DL throughput by serving cell MC454C502E_LTE_JOYOBOYO_SURABAYA 330 deg bearing
1. sec1 (building obstacle) & MC454C524E_LTE_KARANGREJO_WONOKROMO - Improve coverage dominance from
sec1 MC254C524_KarangrejoWonokromo sec1 (waiting for final
pentaband antenna)
Low DL Throughput due to low SINR Improve coverage dominance from
2. No dominant serving by 4544335E_LTE_MANYAR_KERTOADI, 4541855E_LTE_SEMOLOWARU (proposed 15 Mhz with
4541855E_LTE_SEMOLOWARU, 4544339E_LTE_MEDOKAN_SEMAMPIR RRU 2*40W upgrade)
- Propose antenna redesign (adjust height) at
Low DL Throughput due to no dominant serving 3541565G_3G_MANYAR_KERTOARJO
4541565E_LTE_MANYAR_KERTOARJO, 4542826E_LTE_MANYAR IM3, - Coverage shaping in
3.
4544337E_LTE_MANYAR_SAMBONGAN, 4544337E_LTE_MANYAR_SAMBONGAN,
MC454C504E_LTE_MANYAR_SABRANGAN 4542826E_LTE_MANYAR IM3 (waiting for final pentaband
antenna)
Low DL throughput with low PCC PDCCH DL Grant Count serving by
4. Follow up for transport monitoring/upgrade
4541871E_LTE_SUKOLILO_KEPUTIH (indication of transport issue)
Speed Up OA Newsite LTE colo
5. Low DL throughput due to no dominant serving
354C589G_3G_KEPUTRAN_SURABAYA

Table 20. 4G DL Throughput Bad Spot Justification Remark

Huawei NQI Surabaya Project Page 30