You are on page 1of 1


Naxalbari is not a mere renewal of the memory of a historical occurrence in the minds
of the communist revolutionaries and the revolutionary masses. (14)
2. On the other hand, it is a live ideological, political, presence which still influences us
for an incessant revolutionary struggle. (13)
3. This revolution rejected the line of right opportunism and revisionism which had
clung to the communist movement till then. (12)
4. The Indian communist movement started its journey from rightist line to the
revolutionary leftist following this historical rupture. (12)
5. It presented before the broad masses the line of armed revolutionary struggle aimed at
seizing of political power. (10)
6. When the peasants fighters seized arms attacking the Magurjan police out post,
Comrade Charu Mazumdar rightly declared that it has opened a new armed front in
our struggle. (12)
7. Once again in the country, after Telegana, the political agenda of armed struggle and
agrarian revolution gained prominence. (9)
8. That was why in the phases of politics and of counter attack against the combined
onslaught of the state and landlords, a revolutionary high level was contributed by the
peasant fighters to the country. (9)
9. Using this tradition of struggle as a prop, the Indian communist revolutionaries have
come forward at different stages to express their revolutionary urge overtly and also
to question right opportunism. (22)
10. Hoisting the flag of armed revolution, with more clarity in the political ideology, the
Naxalbari opened new era in the history of Indian communist movement and class
struggle. (22)
11. People who believed in revolution from different parts of India rallied behind the
revolutionaries and they broke themselves from the revisionist camp. (16)
12. The united front was a league of revisionist CPI, neo revisionist CPM, they publicly
welcomed the intervention of the congress government under the leadership Indira
Gandhi and hunted the revolutionaries. (16)

capitalism involves in
anarchic productions for its increasing
profits, without any regulations and
without any relation with necessity and
social interest. It goes on to increase its
production. All profits will concentrate only
with some capitalist companies. But
production would be social. It is the
contradiction between social production
and individual appropriation.