8 views

Uploaded by Leandro Az

Disputa entre Einstein y Hilbert

- Einstein and Kepler.pdf
- Anglisht...Projekti.docx
- Bianchi Type V Cosmological Model with Wet Dark Fluid In Brans-Dicke Theory of Gravitation
- David Langlois- Brane cosmology: an introduction
- Molecular Orbital Theory
- On the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction
- FFDf a PC in Q ED
- lec5_1_order_ra
- Michael Ibison- The Yilmaz Cosmology
- Albert Einstein
- ANISRMF
- Capitalization Rules
- Measures of Dependence
- practical_problems_in_slr.doc
- Wk 5 - Chapter 5Supplement Decision Theory
- Harvard Government 2000 Lecture 1
- Poisson CDF Table
- Schwarzschild-and-Kerr-Solutions-of-Einsteins-Field-Equation.pdf
- tugas jurnal
- HW10Solutions.pdf

You are on page 1of 3

V.A. Petrov

Institute for High Energy Physics, 142200, Protvino, Russia

The history of the equations of gravitational field is of particular interest because they are

related to two famous names: Albert Einstein and David Hilbert, and because the circumstances of

their invention bear sometimes almost detective character.

One of the early references is the book Einstein, Hilbert and the Theory of Gravitation by a

renowned historian of science J. Mehra [1], where the great role of Hilbert was showed very clear.

Such view was strengthened in 1978 when the correspondence between Einstein and Hilbert was

published, from which followed that Hilbert informed Einstein on the gravitational field equations

in a letter before his formal publication [2].

The opinion, shared by many physicists, was that it was Hilbert who possessed an undoubtful

priority [3].

However, in 1997 a new sensation shaked just established opinion: the authors of a short

article in Science [4] argued on the basis of the first proofs of the Hilbert paper on the gravita-

tional equations, digged up from the Hilbert archive, that Hilbert had no correct, generally

covariant equation before Einstein. Moreover, the authors of [4] transparently alluded that

Hilbert borrowed some decisive formulae from Einstein! And even that Hilbert tried to hide such

an appropriation with help of deliberately wrong dating of his article.

Such an accusation would seriously undermine the image of David Hilbert from the ethical side,

and was in a sharp contrast to all what was known about his personality.

On the other hand the very personality of Einstein is by no means irreproachable. Take, for

instance, the case of the relativity theory. So, counter-reaction to paper [4] followed.

One of the first was the book by C.J. Bjerknes [5], well documented and with a rich bibliography,

in which the conclusions of paper [4] were contested. This was based on the correspondence between

Einstein and Hilbert and an important fact that the proofs of Hilberts paper the main evidence

of the authors of [4] against Hilbert were mutilated with some part of proofs cutted off.

This fact was mentioned for the first time, but without a due evaluation, in Ref. [6]. In book [5] it

was mentioned that F. Winterberg assumed that the explicit form of the gravitational field could be

fairly contained in the cutted off parts of the proofs. This seriously undermined the main argument

of the authors [4] against Hilbert1 .

In ref. [9] the question was considered in detail with analysis of the Hilbert and Einstein

papers.

Here I will reproduce only one simple reason we used to reject one of the main accusation of

the authors [4] against Hilbert, namely: ...knowledge of Einsteins result may have been crucial to

Hilberts introduction of the trace term into his field equations.

Thus, according to the authors of [4], Hilberts equations

gH

= 0, ()

g

1

Afterwards this consideration was published [7], and, finally, the book [8] appeared in which D. Wuensch gave a

thorough analysis of the mutilated proofs and other relevant documents with a conclusion: Hilbert knew the explicit

form of the gravitational equations, they contended in the proofs and the latter were deliberately mutilated in order

to falsify the historical truth. Note added to proof.

185

where H is the sum of the gravitational and material lagrangians, g is the metric tensor with the

determinant g, are incomplete and need some ad hoc introduction of additional terms (trace

term). This discovery of the authors of paper [4] clearly demonstrates their professional incon-

sistency: they must be never tried to calculate the variational derivative (*) themselves! Otherwise

they would quickly saw that the crucial trace term is safely contained in Eq.(*).

Other mistakes of the authors of paper [4] where analysed in our paper [9].

One thing has to be clear. At the very moment when Hilbert equated the gravitational

part of the lagrangean to the scalar Riemannian curvature the whole game was over.

All the rest was the matter of almost routine calculations, though one has to mention that

Hilbert managed to get, in his paper [10] some very important results (Bianchi identity). All

detailes are given in [9].

So, we conclude that an unfair attack of the authors of ref. [4] against Hilberts originality in

deriving the gravitaional field equations is completely and shamefully failed.

Now, what about Einstein? In ref. [9], there was admitted that Einstein could derive the

gravitational field equations [11] independently of Hilbert.

The main evidence, if to be as loyal as possible to Einstein, is his assertion, made by him in the

letter to Hilbert of 18 November 1915: The system you furnish agrees as far as I can exactly

with what I found in the last few weeks and presented to the Academy [2].

That is, Einstein, in this letter, acknowledged receiving the Hilbert equations of the gravitational

field and informed him that his, Einsteins, equations are essentially the same.

But we know all papers by Einstein presented to the Academy in the last few weeks, including

the paper of the 18 November they all are still wrong and do not contain the trace term. One has

to concede that Einstein had by 18 November 1915 the correct equations but preferred to publish

the wrong ones up to 25 November! In principle this is possible, but...

We also have to mention the paper by Einstein of 18 November 1915 [12] where he claimed the

successful test of his (wrong!) theory in obtaining the correct result for the Mercury perihelion.

F. Winterberg (as cited in ref. [5]) draw the attention to the fact that if Einstein would really follow

his equations as they were described in his paper of 18 November, he would obtain the result twice

larger than the correct one. Nonetheless, his final result was correct! Further interesting details of

this story can be found in [5].

What is our conclusion? We still keep the opinion expressed in [9]: the gravitational equation

has to be named as the EinsteinHilbert equation. The reason is that it was Einstein who

posed the problem to find out the equation in which the energy-momentum tensor is a source

for gravitational potentials [13]. Hilbert had found such an equation. Einstein derived it, quite

probably, later in his own way.

References

D. Reidel. Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland, Boston (1974).

[2] A. Einstein. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Vol. 8. The Berlin Years. Correspondence,

1914-1918 (Eds. Schulmann et al.) (Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press, 1998.)

[3] J. Earman, and C. Glymour. Arch. Hist. Exact. Sci. 19 (1978) 291.

[5] C.J. Bjerknes. Anticipations of Einstein in General Theory of Relativity. (Downers Grove, Ill.:

XIX Inc., 2003.)

186

[6] T. Sauer. Arch. Hist. Exact. Sci. 53 (1999) 529.

[9] A.A. Logunov, M.A. Mestvirishvili and V.A. Petrov. Physics Uspekhi 47 (6) (2004) 607.

[10] D. Hilbert. Nachr. von der Konig. Ges. der Wiss. zu Gottingen. Math.-phys. Klasse, 395 (1916).

Early versions of this paper were reported in Goettingen 16 and 20 November 1915. The text

of the proofs, as of 6 December 1915, is available, e.g., in the book [5].

[11] A. Einstein. Sitz. der Konig. Preus. Akademie der Wiss. zu Berlin. (Vorg. am 25 November

1915), 844.

[12] A. Einstein. Sitz. der Konig. Preus. Akademie der Wiss. zu Berlin. (Vorg. am 18 November

1915), 831.

187

- Einstein and Kepler.pdfUploaded bywcontrer5542
- Anglisht...Projekti.docxUploaded bybledar burgjia
- Bianchi Type V Cosmological Model with Wet Dark Fluid In Brans-Dicke Theory of GravitationUploaded byIJIRST
- David Langlois- Brane cosmology: an introductionUploaded byHuntsmith
- Molecular Orbital TheoryUploaded byYen Yen Yap
- On the Lorentz-Fitzgerald ContractionUploaded bysidbom
- FFDf a PC in Q EDUploaded byCece Ede
- lec5_1_order_raUploaded byz_k_j_v
- Michael Ibison- The Yilmaz CosmologyUploaded byUtnyu
- Albert EinsteinUploaded byarghya_bi108
- ANISRMFUploaded byEddi Lopez Garcia
- Capitalization RulesUploaded byHector Bhoy Reyes
- Measures of DependenceUploaded byhppynnlu
- practical_problems_in_slr.docUploaded byAkhilesh
- Wk 5 - Chapter 5Supplement Decision TheoryUploaded byWan Azizul Faiz Zulkifli
- Harvard Government 2000 Lecture 1Uploaded byJ
- Poisson CDF TableUploaded byRian Pebriansyah
- Schwarzschild-and-Kerr-Solutions-of-Einsteins-Field-Equation.pdfUploaded byJairo E Márquez D
- tugas jurnalUploaded byAslam
- HW10Solutions.pdfUploaded byDavid Lee
- PUBH 6000 Inference About a Mean 2_17 (3) (2)Uploaded byaastha93
- Quantum Mechanics Final Exam 2003Uploaded byMatt
- HRM 535 - Leadership Organizational BehaviorUploaded byArslan Khan
- Mater t TestUploaded byHanif Najib

- MAN_DR_Hamiltoniana.pdfUploaded byLeandro Az
- Manual Servicio Bomba Ksb MegachemUploaded byFrancisco Pulgar Pizarro
- Mantenimiento programadoUploaded byLeandro Az
- 137-209-1-SMUploaded byAngelito Mogollon
- Linear Functionals - S. MrówkaUploaded byLeandro Az
- David Hilbert. La búsqueda de la certidumbre.Uploaded byLeandro Az
- David Hilbert. La búsqueda de la certidumbre.Uploaded byLeandro Az
- Notices of AMS 2016Uploaded byLeandro Az
- 201608 Full IssueUploaded byLeandro Az
- Pigna Sobre M. MorenoUploaded byLeandro Az
- anafunap2Uploaded byLeandro Ribeiro
- criteriosdeconvergenciaparaseries-120619234633-phpapp02Uploaded byRomel Huaraca Paredes
- criteriosdeconvergenciaparaseries-120619234633-phpapp02Uploaded byRomel Huaraca Paredes
- Einstein, Hilbert and Equations of GravitationUploaded byLeandro Az
- Another Proof of 6ζ(2)=π^2 Using Double Integrals - Daniele Ritelli (AMM, v120, n7, 2013)Uploaded byLeandro Az
- Undertaker With FireUploaded byLeandro Az
- Ejercicio de programacion linealUploaded byLeandro Az
- Teoria. Segunda Parte_2016Uploaded byLeandro Az
- Etnocentrismo.rtfUploaded byLeandro Az
- Orígenes de.la.Teoria.de.DistribucionesUploaded byAnonymous TlGnQZv5d7
- The UnforgivenUploaded byLeandro Az
- La Demostración Elemental de TNPUploaded byLeandro Az
- On Integrals Related to and Extensions of the Lebesgue Integrals - T. H. Hildebrandt (AMS, 1917)Uploaded byLeandro Az
- Tratamientos Tópicos de La PsoriasisUploaded byLeandro Az
- Sistema en ParaleloUploaded byLeandro Az
- Carta de Serge Lang a Mordell y Siegel Smf Gazette 63-17-36Uploaded byLeandro Az
- Jean Pierre SerreUploaded byCarlos Pérez
- pág 33-40Uploaded byLeandro Az
- Preliminaries PDEUploaded byLeandro Az

- JEE Main 2018 Online Mode 15-04-2018 Morning ShiftUploaded byVatsa Rajvardhan
- Syllabus.xlsxUploaded bymostlazyele
- lect6Uploaded bydk519
- Exercises for Lecture x2Uploaded byTara Edwards
- Psych Rome TryUploaded bypalanihunt
- An automatic FTIR method to analize water content in used fuel oils. An alternative to Karl-Fischer titration.Uploaded byCarlos Diaz
- Fludarabine PhosphateUploaded byMulayam Singh Yadav
- 2006-9 IAC PaperUploaded byDaniel Valadares
- CoalUploaded byYusup Maulana Sp
- Experiment 1 MagnetismUploaded byNur Atikah Shuhada Rosli
- Physics Midterm Review '13Uploaded bycstolvr
- IIT Class XI Phy Rotation MotionUploaded bysatish jadhav
- Bio-Optics Reserach and Deveice DevelopmentUploaded byRutvij Kotecha
- Assignment 1 Sft1023Uploaded byJongwakiJwkk
- chapter11.pptUploaded byFendi Delacerna
- Waves on a String Type 2 Part 1 of 2 EngUploaded byRavi Yadav
- Carboxylic AcidsUploaded byMohamad Arif Azam
- CS and CyanideUploaded bystignz
- Horie Adhesives glossaryUploaded byraniakrd
- zUploaded byMailiw Ashford
- Assignment ElectrostaticsUploaded byRammohan Vaidyanathan
- Gas Kiln design & firingUploaded byStefan Van Cleemput
- CHE411 Fall 2010-Chemical Reaction Engineeirng-Ahmed a AbdalaUploaded byYayan Indrayani
- RelativityUploaded byAbhishek Chatterjee
- Student Unit Op Lab manual_Thin Film Evaporator.pdfUploaded byMuiz Moktar
- 1999 LBNL Ferrofluid Flow in Porous Media[1]Uploaded byPondok Huda
- OECD 114 - OECD GUIDELINE FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS Viscosity of LiquidsUploaded bycactussoulman
- Igcse 12 Forces&ShapeUploaded byHany ElGezawy
- 0 2 - wave intro assignment 1 solutionUploaded byapi-272986951
- Engineering Geology - Lecture Notes, Study Materials and Important questions answersUploaded byBrainKart Com