Professional Documents
Culture Documents
17, 2017 16
Abstract. Recently, neutrosophic sets and its application and ranking alternatives. Student are evaluated using
to decision making have become a topic of significant SVN, for the treatment of neutralities, and Euclidean dis-
im-portance for researchers and practitioners. The present tance. The paper ends with conclusion and future work
work addresses one of the most complex aspects of the proposal for the application of neutrosophy to new areas
formative process based on competencies: evaluation. In of education.
this paper, a new method for competencies evaluation is
developed in a multicriteria framework. The proposed
framework is composed of four activities, framework,
gathering information, ideal solution distance calculation Keywords: competency, evaluation, neutrosophy, SVN numbers
In the framework phase, he structures and elements of the In this paper linguistic variables[11] are represented using
decision problem are defined: experts, criteria, etc. The in- single valued neutrosophic numbers [16] for developing a
formation provided by experts is collected, according to the framework to decision support.
defined framework in the gathering information phase. In
line with our aims in this paper, a SVN numbers [10] ap- 2.2 Proposed framework
proach is developed due to the fact that provide adequate Our aim is to develop a framework for competencies evalu-
computational models to deal with linguistic information
ation based on for decision analysis based and SVN num-
[11] in decision problems allowing to include handling of
bers. The model consists of the following phases (graph-
indeterminate and inconsistent .
A way to compute a rating of alternatives is to use an ideal ically, Fig. 3).
alternative. A comparison between an ideal alternative and
available options in order to find the optimal choice could
be used [12]. Normally, the closer alternative to the Framework
ideal, corresponds to the best alternative.
3 SVN-numbers
Gathering
information
Neutrosophy [13] is mathematical theory developed for
dealing with indeterminacy . The truth value in neutrosophic
set is as follows [14]:
Rating
Let be a set defined as: = {(, , ) , ,
alternatives
[0, 1]}, a neutrosophic valuation n is a mapping from the set
of propositional formulas to , that is for each sentence p
we have (p) = (, , ).
The proposed framework is composed of three activities,
To facilitate the real world applications of neutrosophic set
framework, gathering information and rating alternatives.
and set-theoretic operators single valued neutrosophic set
(SVNS ) [5] was developed
A single valued neutrosophic set (SVNS) has been defined Framework
as follows [5]:
Let be a universe of discourse. A single valued neutro- In this phase, the evaluation framework, the decision prob-
sophic set over is an object having the form: lem structure is defined. The framework is established as
= {, (), (), (): } (1) follows:
C= {1 , 2 , , with 2 , a set competencies.
where (): [0,1], (), [0,1] and E= {1 , 2 , , } with 2 A set of students.
(): [0,1] with 0 ( ) + ( ) + (): 3 for
all . The intervals ( ), ( ) y () denote the
Gathering information
truth- membership degree, the indeterminacy-membership
degree and the falsity membership degree of to , respec- In this phase, the assessments is provided by means of as-
tively. sessment vectors:
Single valued neutrosophic numbers (SVN number) is de- = ( , = 1, . . , , = 1, . . , ) (3)
noted by = (,b,), where ,,[0,1] and ++3 . The assessment , for each criterion of each student ,
Alternatives could be rated according Euclidean distance is expressed by means of SVN numbers.
in SVN [15, 16].
Let = ( 1 , 2 , . . , ) be a vector of SVN numbers
such that = ( , , ) j=(1,2, , ) and = (1 , Rating alternatives
2 , , ) ( = 1,2, , ) be vectors of SVN num-
For rating alternatives an ideal option is constructed [16,
bers such that = ( , , ) ( = 1,2, , ), ( = 1,2,
17] .the evaluation criteria can be categorized into two cat-
, ). Then the separation measure between y is
egories, benefit and cost. Let + be a collection of benefit
defined as follows:
1 criteria and be a collection of cost criteria. The ideal al-
1 2 2 2 2 ternative is defined as:
si = (3 nj=1 {(|aij -a*j |) +(|bij -b*j |) +(|cij -c*j |) }) (
= {(=1 | + , =1 | ) , (=1 |
= 1,2, , ) (2) +
, =1 | ) , (=1 |
+ , =1 | )}
= [1 , 2 , , ] (4)
in Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ), 2010 IEEE International 16. ahin, R. and M. Yiider, A Multi-criteria neutrosophic
Conference on. 2010. IEEE. group decision making metod based TOPSIS for supplier
9. Clemen, R.T., Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5077, 2014.
to Decision Analysis. 1996: Duxbury Press. 17. Leyva-Vzquez, M., K. Prez-Teruel, and R.I. John. A
10. Deli, I. and Y. uba, A ranking method of single valued model for enterprise architecture scenario analysis
neutrosophic numbers and its applications to multi- based on fuzzy cognitive maps and OWA operators. in
attribute decision making problems. International Electronics, Communications and Computers
Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2016: p. (CONIELECOMP), 2014 International Conference on.
1-14. 2014. IEEE.
11. Leyva-Vzquez, M., et al. The Extended Hierarchical 18. Leyva-Vzquez, M., et al., Tcnicas para la
Linguistic Model in Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. in representacin del conocimiento causal: un estudio de
Technologies and Innovation: Second International caso en Informtica Mdica. Revista Cubana de
Conference, CITI 2016, Guayaquil, Ecuador, November informacin en ciencias de la salud, 2013. 24(1): p. 73-
23-25, 2016, Proceedings 2. 2016. Springer. 83.
12. Zeng, S., T. Baleentis, and C. Zhang, A method based 19. Prez-Teruel, K., M. Leyva-Vzquez, and M. Espinilla-
on OWA operator and distance measures for multiple Estevez. A linguistic software requirement prioritization
attribute decision making with 2-tuple linguistic model with heterogeneous information. in 4th
information. Informatica, 2012. 23(4): p. 665-681. International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery,
13. Smarandache, F., A Unifying Field in Logics: Knowledge Management and Decision Support
Neutrosophic Logic. Philosophy, 1999: p. 1-141. (EUREKA 2013), Mazatln (Mexico). 2013.
14. Rivieccio, U., Neutrosophic logics: Prospects and 20. Espin-Andrade, R.A., et al., Archimedean-
problems. Fuzzy sets and systems, 2008. 159(14): p. Compensatory Fuzzy Logic Systems. International
1860-1868. Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015.
15. Ye, J., Single-valued neutrosophic minimum spanning 8(sup2): p. 54-62.
tree and its clustering method. Journal of intelligent 21. F. Smarandache, Neutrosophic Perspectives: Triplets,
Systems, 2014. 23(3): p. 311-324. Duplets, Multisets, Hybrid Operators, Modal Logic,
Hedge Algebras. And Applications. Pons Editions,
Bruxelles, 325 p., 2017.