You are on page 1of 3

PHILIPPINE NORMAL UNIVERSITY

The National Center for Teacher Education


College of Flexible Learning and ePNU
Taft Avenue cor. Ayala Blvd., Ermita, Manila
cflex@pnu.edu.ph317-1768 local 776 The FUTURE is NOW.

Globe Prism Digital Literacy Program


TRAINING EVALUATION

BRANCH/INSTITUTION:_____________________________________________________________________

POSITION:________________________________________________________________________

I. Program
Plenary Session I. Reflecting on Digital Literacy
(Nikki Vergara, Ralph Lumbres)
Please encircle the number that signifies your degree of satisfaction with each item below.
1-Very Dissatisfied 2- Dissatisfied 4-Satisfied 5-Very Satisfied
1. The discussed plenary topic was relevant to the theme. 4.407767
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.361905
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.4286

Plenary Session II. Prototyping, Failure, and Assumptions


(Bernice Dy, Kaye Robles, Anthony Garciano)
1.The discussed plenary topic was relevant to the theme. 4.457143
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.514286
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.96875

Plenary Session III. All About Design Thinking (Ness Roque-Lumbres, Lacey Ramos)
1.The discussed plenary topic was relevant to the theme. 4.495238
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.495238
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.47619

Plenary Session IV. Using Technology to Teach Young Learners


(Nikki Vergara, Z Cubillas, Bernice Dy, Ralph Lumbres, Kaye Robles, Lacey Ramos, Anthony Garciano, Ness Roque-
Lumbres)
1.The discussed plenary topic was relevant to the theme. 4.52381
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.542857
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.533333

Plenary Session VI. Generation Z?


(Gerson Abesamis)
1.The discussed parallel topic was relevant to the theme. 4.533333
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.504762
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.52381

Plenary Session VII. Starting Our Prism Missions


(Bernice Dy, Anthony Garciano, Ness Roque-Lumbre, Gerson Abesamis, Kaye Robles, Lacey Ramos, Ralph Lumbres,
Nikki Vergara)
1.The discussed parallel topic was relevant to the theme. 4.542857
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.561905
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.533333
PHILIPPINE NORMAL UNIVERSITY
The National Center for Teacher Education
College of Flexible Learning and ePNU
Taft Avenue cor. Ayala Blvd., Ermita, Manila
cflex@pnu.edu.ph317-1768 local 776 The FUTURE is NOW.

Parallel Session. Mission Projects Level 1!

Red Mission: Getting to know the youth (Bernice Dy)


1.The discussed parallel topic was relevant to the theme. 4.761905
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.733333
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.761905

Orange Mission: Motivating Learning (Anthony Garciano, Ness Roque-Lumbres)


1.The discussed parallel topic was relevant to the theme. 4.809524
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.942857
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.838095

Yellow Mission: Pitching a Project (Gerson Abesamis)


1.The discussed parallel topic was relevant to the theme. 4.847619
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.961905
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.838095

Green Mission: Promoting Social Media Etiquette (Kaye Robles)


1.The discussed parallel topic was relevant to the theme. 4.62069
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.655172
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.586207

Blue Mission: Polishing Teaching Strategies (Lacey Ramos)


1.The discussed parallel topic was relevant to the theme. 4.363636
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.363636
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.409091

Indigo Mission: Designing School Communications (Ralph Lumbres)


1.The discussed parallel topic was relevant to the theme. 4.37037
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.4375
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.46875

Violet Mission: Connecting with Learning Communities (Nikki Vergara)


1.The discussed parallel topic was relevant to the theme. 4.419355
2.The speaker was engaging in the delivery of the assigned plenary topic. 4.37931
3.The speaker included the right level of detail for the participants knowledge level. 4.366667

II. Overall Evaluation for the Lecturers


1. Overall, how satisfied were you with the speakers/presenters? 4.510204
2. The content of STEM training sessions was appropriate and informative. 4.530612

III. Secretariat
Please rate the following:
1. Pre-Assessment 4.361905
2. Registration process 4.638095
3. Materials provided 4.619048
PHILIPPINE NORMAL UNIVERSITY
The National Center for Teacher Education
College of Flexible Learning and ePNU
Taft Avenue cor. Ayala Blvd., Ermita, Manila
cflex@pnu.edu.ph317-1768 local 776 The FUTURE is NOW.

4. Venue 4.409524
5. Food 4.371429
6. Organization of the program 4.314286
7. Training staff 4.342857

III. Comments/ Suggestion


1. What did you like most about the Globe Prism activity?

2. What did you like least about the Globe Prism activity?

3. What topics would you like to suggest for future Globe Prism Training?

4. In what ways could the presentations and recommendations of this activity be used in your institution?

5. General rating for this Globe Prism Training


1.Very Poor 2.Poor 3.Average 4.VeryGood 5.Excellent

6. Other comments/suggestions: