0 Up votes0 Down votes

19 views49 pagesNov 05, 2017

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

© All Rights Reserved

19 views

© All Rights Reserved

- Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster
- The Field Updated Ed: The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe
- The Final Day: A John Matherson Novel
- Bloody Sunday: A Thriller
- WomanCode: Perfect Your Cycle, Amplify Your Fertility, Supercharge Your Sex Drive, and Become a Power Source
- The Hormone Reset Diet: The 21-day Diet That Resets Your Metabolism
- The Making of the Atomic Bomb
- Blackfish City: A Novel
- Blackfish City: A Novel
- Wheels of Life: A User's Guide to the Chakra System
- Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich
- Chernobyl 01:23:40: The Incredible True Story of the World's Worst Nuclear Disaster
- The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power
- Multipliers, Revised and Updated: How the Best Leaders Make Everyone Smarter
- Zero Hour
- The Energy Bus: 10 Rules to Fuel Your Life, Work, and Team With Positive Energy
- The Keto Reset Diet: Reboot Your Metabolism in 21 Days and Burn Fat Forever
- The Power of Full Engagement: Managing Energy, Not Time, is the Key to High Performance and Personal Renewal
- Midnight in Chernobyl: The Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster
- Positive Energy: 10 Extraordinary Prescriptions for Transforming Fatigue, Stress, and Fear into Vibrance, Strength, and Love

You are on page 1of 49

Semester-1

Paper -2

Unit-I: Atomic Structure

Lesson: Atomic Structure

Lesson Developer: Geetika Bhalla

College/Department: Hindu College, University of Delhi

Atomic Structure

1.1 Introduction

Though the atom has been in existence since the beginning of creation, it was only in

465 BC that it was first thought of and mentioned by the Greek philosopher Democritus

(460-370 B.C). He believed that matter was indestructible and made up of tiny particles

called atoms. The structure of atom as known to our ancient Hindu philosophers (600500

BC) was made up of exceedingly small, indivisible and eternal particles called

"Paramanu". For the next 2000 years and more the atom was forgotten until in 1808,

Dalton put forward the living hypothesis called Dalton's atomic theory.

Dalton in 1808, proposed that atom was the smallest indivisible particle of matter.

However, later on, the researches carried out by various eminent scientists like J. J.

Thomson, Goldstein, Chadwick, and many others established beyond doubt that the

atom was not the smallest particle but had a complex structure of its own and was made

up of still smaller particles like electrons, protons and neutrons. However, an atom is the

smallest particle, which retains the properties of an element. The arrangement of

particles within the atom was put forward by Rutherford in 1911 on the basis of his

scattering experiments or nuclear structure of atoms. This model, however, suffered

from a serious drawback that it could not explain the stability of the atom. Niels Bohr in

1913 proposed a model of the hydrogen atom that not only did away with the problem of

Rutherfords unstable atom but also satisfactorily explained the line spectrum of

hydrogen element. The Bohr model was the first atomic model based on the quantization

of energy.

Biographic Sketch

Biographic Sketch

Atomic Structure

Amongst the various scientists who proposed different models for structure of an atom,

the Nobel Prize was conferred to Thomson in 1906, Rutherford in 1908, Bohr in 1922,

Heisenberg in 1932 and Schrdinger in 1933. Although the models proposed by some of

these scientists were rejected later but all of them were significant contributions in the

progress of science and were a major breakthrough in their times.

Historical Context

The history of the study of the atomic nature of matter illustrates the thinking process

that went on as science progressed. The models used by various scientists might not

provide an absolute understanding of the atom but only a way of abstracting so that they

can make useful predictions about them.

Democritus 460 B.C. Developed the idea of tiny particles called atoms,

which could not be subdivided or made any

smaller.

The atom is the smallest particle of matter that

takes part in a chemical reaction.

Atoms are indivisible and cannot be created or

destroyed.

Atoms of the same element are identical in every

respect.

experiments.

His model of the atom looked like raisins stuck on

the surface of a lump of pudding.

Max Planck 1900 Showed that when you vibrate atoms strong

enough, such as when you heat an object until it

glows, you can measure the energy only in

discrete units. He called these energy packets,

quanta.

electrons from atoms, a phenomenon called the

Atomic Structure

"photoelectric effect."

Published the famous equation E=mc2

(e=1.602 x 10-19 coulomb) and the mass (m =

9.11 x 10-28 gram) of an electron.

E. Rutherford 1911 Discovered the nucleus and provided the basis for

the modern atomic structure through his alpha

particle scattering experiment.

He established that the nucleus was: very dense,

very small and positively charged.

He also assumed that the electrons were located

outside the nucleus.

Drawback: The theory of electricity and

magnetism predicted that opposite charges

attract each other and the electrons should

gradually lose energy and spiral inward.

Electrons can orbit only at certain allowed

distances from the nucleus.

Atoms radiate energy when an electron jumps

from a higher-energy orbit to a lower-energy

orbit. Also, an atom absorbs energy when an

electron gets boosted from a low-energy orbit to

a high-energy orbit.

Drawbacks: The theory only worked roughly in

case of heavier elements.

Could not explain Zeeman effect and Stark effect.

Gave the concept of stationary orbits.

Louis de Broglie 1924 Showed that if light can exist as both particles

and waves, then atomic particles also behave like

waves; gave the principle of dual behaviour of

matter.

within the atom that agreed with experiment: If

an electron has a certain set of quantum

numbers, then no other electron in that atom can

have the same set of quantum numbers.

Physicists call this "Pauli's exclusion principle."

Werner Heisenberg 1925 Had a theory of his own called matrix mechanics,

which also explained the behavior of atoms.

Heisenberg based his theory on mathematical

quantities called matrices that fit with the

conception of electrons as particles.

He based his theory on waves and used partial

differential equations to solve the system of

equations.

'psi'. Born thought they resembled waves of

chance and hence gave the idea of probability of

finding the particle in space (a given volume

element) around the nucleus.

no experiment can measure the position and

momentum of a quantum particle simultaneously.

Scientists call this the "Heisenberg uncertainty

principle." This implies that as one measures the

certainty of the position of a particle, the

uncertainty in the momentum gets

correspondingly larger. Or, with an accurate

momentum measurement, the knowledge about

the particle's position gets correspondingly less.

Atomic Structure

James Chadwick 1932 Found the weight of atom did not check out when

working with isotopes and thus found the

predicted particles in nucleus with no charge,

called the neutron.

Neutron weighs about the same as a proton.

Neutron has no electrical charge.

i. An atom consists of a small, heavy positively charged nucleus in the centre and

the electrons revolve around bit in circular paths called orbits.

ii. Out of an infinite number of circular orbits possible, the electrons revolve only in

certain permissible orbits having a fixed value of energy.

These orbits (shown in Figure 1.1) are called energy levels or stationary states. The

energies of the different stationary states in case of hydrogen atom are given by

expression,

e = electronic charge and 0 = permittivity = 8.8542 10-12 C2N-1m-2

and n is an integer that can take the values 1, 2, 3, , etc. for first, second, third, etc.

energy levels, respectively

Since the electrons revolve only in certain permissible orbits, they can have only certain

definite or discrete values of energy and not any arbitrary value of their own. This is

expressed by saying that the energy of an electron is quantized.

Only those orbits are permissible whose angular momentum, mvr, is an integral multiple

of h/2 . Mathematically it can be expressed as:

Hence, the angular momentum of an electron in an atom is also quantized, i.e., it can

have certain definite or discrete values and not any arbitrary value of its own.

Atomic Structure

1. While revolving in a particular orbit, the electron does not lose or gain any energy.

Energy is absorbed or emitted only when the electrons jump from one orbit to

another. the amount of energy absorbed or emitted during this transition is given by:

v. = = or = E2E1E hv

where, E2= energy of higher orbit,

E1= energy of lower orbit,

E = difference in energy between higher and lower orbits, v = frequency of light

absorbed or emitted, = wavelength of light absorbed or emitted, c = velocity

8 -1

of light (3.0 x 10 m s ) and h = Plancks constant.

1 Bohrs model of atom could not explain the spectra of atoms containing more than

one electron. It failed even for the simple helium atom, which has only two electrons.

2 Although Bohrs model was successful in explaining the spectra of hydrogen atom

+ 2+

and hydrogen like systems such as He , Li etc., it could not account for the fine

structure in the spectrum observed using refined spectroscopic techniques. It is found

that each spectral line on high resolution is in fact a doublet, i.e., two closely spaced

lines.

3 Bohrs theory was also unable to account for the splitting of the spectral lines in

the presence of a magnetic field (Zeeman Effect) or an electric field (Stark Effect).

4 Bohr proposed a two dimensional or flat model of the atom which now has

become obsolete as it has been established that atom is a three dimensional entity.

5 It failed to account for Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

6 It failed to account for the shapes of molecules.

In view of the shortcomings of the Bohr model, attempts were made to develop a more

suitable and general model for atom. Two important developments that contributed

significantly in the formulation of such a model were:

(ii) Heisenberg uncertainty principle

In case of light, some phenomenon, like interference [shown in Fig. 1.2(a)], diffraction,

etc., can be explained if the light is supposed to possess wave character. However,

certain other phenomenon, such as black body radiation and photoelectric effect [shown

in Fig. 1.2(b)] can be explained only if it is believed to be a stream of photons, i.e., it

has particle character (or is corpuscular in nature). Thus, light is said to have a dual

character.

Comment

The quanta of light (radiant energy) are called photons (from the Greek phos = light;

introduced by G. N. Lewis in 1926). They are defned by the equation:

E = h

where h is Plancks constant (named for the German physicist Max Planck, 18581947)

and is the frequency of radiation.

Atomic Structure

(b) photoelectric effect

Louis de-Broglie, the French physicist in 1924 proposed that matter, like radiation,

should also exhibit dual behaviour, i.e., both particle and wave-like properties (the

distinction between the properties of a particle and a wave is given in Table 1.1). This

means that just as a photon has momentum as well as wavelength, electrons should also

have momentum as well as wavelength. de-Broglie, from this analogy, gave the

following relation between wavelength () and momentum (p) of a material particle, i.e.,

where m is the mass of the particle, v its velocity, and p its momentum.

The wave character of matter should not be confused with the wave character of

electromagnetic waves. They differ in various aspects as given in Table 1.2.

Although, de-Broglie equation is applicable to all material objects but it has significance

only in case of microscopic particles.

-1

For example, consider a ball of mass 0.1 kg moving with a speed of 60 m s . From

-34

de-Broglie equation, the wavelength of the associated wave is h/mv = (6.62 x 10

-34

)/(0.1 x 60) or 10 m. It is apparent that this wavelength is too small for ordinary

-31

observation. On the other hand, an electron with a rest mass equal to 9.11 x10 kg,

-30

i.e., approximately 10 kg moving at the same speed would have a wavelength = (6.62

-34 -30 -5

x 10 )/(10 x 60) =10 m, which can be easily measured experimentally.

showed that a crystal diffracts that electron beam in the same way as light radiation is

diffracted, a phenomenon characteristic of waves. This provided a proof of wave nature

of electrons. It needs to be noted that according to de-Broglie, every object in motion

has a wave character. The wavelengths associated with ordinary objects are so short

Atomic Structure

(because of their large mass) that their wave properties cannot be detected. The

wavelengths associated with electrons and other subatomic particles (with very small

mass) can however be detected experimentally.

position in space, i.e., a particle example, on throwing a stone in a pond of

is localized in space. For water, the waves start moving out in the

example, a cricket ball. form of concentric circles. Thus, wave is

delocalized in space.

2. When a particular space is Two or more waves can co-exist in the same

occupied by one particle, the region of space and hence undergo

same space cannot be occupied interference.

simultaneously by any other

particle. Particles do not undergo

interference.

present in a given region of given region of space, due to interference,

space, their total value is equal the resultant wave can be larger or smaller

to their sum. than the individual waves.

The wave character of matter should not be confused with the wave character of

electromagnetic waves. They differ in various aspects as given in Table 1.2.

radiations) are associated with electric and material particles, like electron,

magnetic fields perpendicular to each other proton etc.) are not associated with

and to the direction of propagation. electric and magnetic fields.

2. They do not require any medium for They require medium for their

propagation, i.e., they can pass through propagation, i.e., they cannot pass

vacuum. through vacuum.

3. They travel with the same speed as that of The speed of these waves is not the

light. same as that of light. Moreover, it is

not constant for all material

particles.

Example

A moving particle has 4.55 x 10-25 J of kinetic energy. Calculate its wavelength. (mass =

9.1 x 10-31 kg and h = 6.6 x 10-34 kg m2 s-1)

Solution:

m = 9.1 x 10-31 kg

h = 6.6 x 10-34 kg m2 s-1

Thus, (9.1 x 10-31) v2 = 4.55 x 10-25

or v2 = 106 or v = 103 m s-1

= h/mv = 6.6 x 10-34 / (9.1x10-31) x 103

= 7.25 x 10-7 m.

Two particles A and B are in motion. If the wavelength associated with particle A is 5 x

10-8 m, calculate the wavelength associated with particle B if its momentum is half of A.

Solution:

Atomic Structure

A = h/pA and B= h/pB

so A/ B = pB/pA

But pB = pA (given)

or B = 2 A = 2 (5 x 10-8) m =10-7 m

Interesting fact

A very interesting fact about the life of two scientists lies in the concept of the

wave-particle duality of matter.

It was J.J. Thomson who first showed in 1895 that electrons are subatomic particles and

his son G.P. Thomson was one of the first who showed in 1926 that electrons could also

behave as waves.

J.J. Thomson, the father, won the Nobel Prize in 1906 for showing particle nature of

electrons and his son won Nobel Prize in 1937 for showing that electrons behave as

waves.

consequence of dual behaviour of matter and radiation. It states that it is impossible to

determine simultaneously the exact position and velocity of an electron.

The uncertainty principle can best be understood with the help of an example.

Suppose you are asked to measure the thickness of a sheet of paper with an unmarked

meter-stick, obviously, the result obtained would be extremely inaccurate and

meaningless. In order to obtain any accuracy you would have to use an instrument

graduated in units smaller than the thickness of a sheet of paper. Analogously, in order

to determine the position of an electron, we must use a 'metrestick' calibrated in units

smaller than the dimensions of an electron. To observe an electron, we can illuminate it

with light or electromagnetic radiation. The light used must have a wavelength smaller

than the dimensions of an electron, but photon of such light would possess very high

energy. The high momentum photons of such light (p = h/ ) would change the velocity

of electrons on collision. In this process, although we are able to calculate the position of

the electron accurately, we would know very little about the velocity of the electron after

the collision. On the other hand, if we reduce the energy (h ) of the photons, i.e., we

increase wavelength () of light, the effects of impacts could be considerably diminished.

But at the same time the electron would be less accurately defined owing to the

decreased resolving power of the microscope. Therefore, with light of low frequency, it is

possible to know the velocity of an electron, but not its position.

For example, let us try to measure the momentum of an electron moving with a velocity

8 -1 -30 8 -22 -1

of say 10 m s . Momentum (mv) of the electron = 10 x 10 = 10 kg m s . The

-15

photon needed for looking at the electron has wavelength of the order of 6 x 10 m.

It is clear that the -photon required to detect the electron will hit with a momentum

1000 times greater than its own. So, the very act of observing the electron disturbs it.

In other words, it can be stated that if the position of the electron is measured

accurately, there is an uncertainty in its velocity or momentum and vice-versa.

Atomic Structure

and m = mass of the particle.

Example

Calculate the uncertainty in the velocity of an electron if the uncertainty in its position is1

-34 2 -1

or 100 pm. (h = 6.6 10 kg M s )

Solution:

-10 -31

= 10 m (given) m = 9.1 x 10 kg Applying uncertainty principle :

-34 -31 -10 5 -1

= (6.6 x 10 )/(4 x 3.14 x 9.1 x 10 x 10 ) = 5.77 x 10 m s

Heisenbergs uncertainty principle. The approximate dimension of a nucleus of an atom is

14

of the order of 10 . Now, if the electron were supposed to be present inside the

14

nucleus, the maximum uncertainty in its position would be 10 . Using the uncertainty

expression, the maximum uncertainty in its velocity would be:

This uncertainty in the velocity is much higher even than the velocity of light, which is

not possible. Hence, such an electron cannot exist.

Atomic Structure

FAQs

for making precise measurements?

No, the uncertainty is not due to limitations in our technology for making precise

measurements. The uncertainty is inherent in the nature of subatomic particles and in

the very process of making measurements. For making a measurement, the instrument

must interact with the particle on which the measurement is made. During this

interaction it changes the properties of the particle 'uncontrollably'. If the interaction is

through photons (which have a dual nature) then shorter wavelength photons can

determine the position of the particle more accurately. But such photons will have very

high energy and at the instant of measurement of the position it will grossly change the

momentum of the particle. If, in order to accurately determine the momentum, we use

low energy photons, then the wavelength would become very large and the uncertainty

in position will increase.

According to the uncertainty principle, the position and the momentum of an electron

cannot be known accurately at the same time. So, the Bohr's concept of well-defined

paths or orbits for a moving electron becomes meaningless. There is always some

R

uncertainty associated with the location the electron. In other words, we can only talk

about probability of finding an electron at a point in space rather than describing it

accurately.

Bohr model of the hydrogen atom not only ignores dual behavior of matter but also

contradicts Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. In view of this inherent weakness in the

Bohr's model, there was no point in extending his model to other atoms. What was

needed was an insight into the structure of the atom that takes into account

wave-particle duality of matter and was consistent with Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

This came with the advent of quantum mechanics.

In classical mechanics, the state of a system is defined by specifying all the forces

acting on the system and all the positions and velocities of the particles. Classical

mechanics is based on Newtons laws of motion that successfully describes the motion of

all macroscopic objects such as a falling stone, orbiting planets etc., which have

essentially a particle-like behaviour. However, it fails when applied to microscopic objects

like electrons, atoms, molecules etc. This is mainly because of the fact that classical

mechanics ignores the concept of dual behavior of matter and the uncertainty principle.

The branch of science that takes into account this dual behavior of matter is called

quantum mechanics.

Quantum mechanics is a theoretical science that deals with the study of the motion

of the microscopic objects that have both observable wave like and particle like

properties. It specifies the laws of motion that these objects obey. When quantum

mechanics is applied to macroscopic objects (for which wave like properties are

insignificant) the results are the same as those from the classical mechanics.

uncertainty in the position and the velocity overruled Bohr's picture of fixed

circular

orbits. The term probability distribution is used to describe position of an electron.

A stream of electrons is associated with a wave, whose wavelength () is given

Since electron is under the influence of nuclear forces, it can be compared to a

stationary or standing wave formed by a vibrating string fixed between two

points.

Energy values of the electron are quantized as calculated by Bohr.

Erwin Schrdinger. Here, however, we shall be discussing the quantum mechanics of

Schrdinger, which is based on the ideas of wave motion. With the wave nature of a

Atomic Structure

moving electron confirmed, it was expected that its behaviour could be described by a

suitable wave equation just as for waves of light, sound, etc.

total energy of the electron, V = potential energy of the electron and x, y and z are the

coordinates of the electron with nucleus at the origin.

This equation was proposed by Schrdinger, which won him the Nobel Prize in Physics in

1933. In quantum mechanics, the state of the system is defined by a mathematical

function () called the state function or wave function. A wave equation gives a

complete description of a system. Just as we can write a volume function for a gas, V =

nRT/P, we can write a wave function for a wave in the form of .

distance from the nucleus Differentiating with respect to x

Differentiating with respect to x

Differentiating again,

The total energy of a particle is sum of potential energy and kinetic energy, i.e.,

E = P.E. + K.E.

= V + mv2

E V = mv2

v2 = 2(E - V)/ m

Atomic Structure

operations to be performed (i.e., taking second differentials, multiplying their sum by

2 2

h /8 m and adding the potential energy, V) on the function . The result of carrying out

these operations on function is the same as multiplying by the electronic energy, E.

This form of the Schrdinger wave equation (i.e. = E) is called an eigenvalue

equation.

FAQs

What is an operator?

follows it. For every observable/ measurable property in classical mechanics, there is a

corresponding operator in quantum mechanics. Like d/dx (first derivative of function),

2 2

d /dx (second derivative of function), (square root of function) etc, are some

examples of operators.

The Hamiltonian operator defines the sequence of mathematical operations to be

performed on the wave function, , which follows it in the Schrdinger

Equation. = E

i.e.,

Hamiltonian operator. This indicates a correspondence between the Hamiltonian operator

and the energy. In fact, the Hamiltonian operator in the above equation is constructed

in a manner such that it contains both the kinetic energy term and the potential energy

term and therefore it is evident that the Hamiltonian operator has the dimensions of

energy (energy units) in the Schrdinger Equation.

The solution of the Schrdinger wave equation led to the concept of the most probable

regions where the chance to find the electrons is maximum. This is in contrast to the

well-defined circular paths proposed by Bohr. In accordance with Heisenbergs

uncertainty principle, the electron cannot exist at a definite point but at certain regions in

space around the nucleus where the probability of finding electron is about 90-95%.

Institute of Lifelong, University of Delhi

Atomic Structure

An orbital may be defined as a region in space, around the nucleus, where the probability

of finding electron is maximum.

Table 1.3.

Table 1.3 Difference between an orbit and an orbital

S.No Orbit Orbital

path around the nucleus in which nucleus in which the probability of finding the

an electron revolves. electron is the maximum.

an electron. an electron around the nucleus.

is against the Heisenberg's the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle and the

uncertainty principle and the de-Broglie relation.

de-Broglie concept.

4. All orbits are circular. Orbitals have different shapes. For example,

s- orbital is spherically

symmetrical and p-orbital is dumbbell

shaped.

5. Orbits do not have directional Except the s-orbital, all others have

characteristics. directional characteristics and, thus, they

clearly explain the shape of a molecule during

bonding.

in an orbit is 2n2, where n electrons and that too with opposite spins.

represents the number of orbit.

principles of quantum mechanics. It was the genius of Schrdinger to arrive at equation

(1.4) by intuition and to justify it by solving this equation to give values for E in

agreement with the experiments. It may be emphasized again that the above treatment

is in no way a proof of the Schrdinger equation, it merely shows that if the deBroglies

relationship is assumed and if the motion of the electron is analogous to a system of

standing waves, equation (1.4) is the type of the wave equation to be expected. The

Schrdinger equation shows a logical coherence to a vast amount of experimental

observations. It has been found to hold true in both microscopic and macroscopic

systems.

obtain a suitable expression for showing how the wave amplitude varies with distance

along the x, y, z-axes and then to derive solutions of the differential equation.

There will be, in every case, many expressions for satisfying the Schrdinger equation,

all of which are, however, not acceptable. Only those wave functions which satisfy

certain conditions are acceptable and are called eigenfunctions of the system, while the

energy E, corresponding to the these eigenfunctions are called eigenvalues.

For hydrogen atom, the eigenvalues correspond to the discrete sets of energy values

postulated by Bohr theory, i.e., the occurrence of definite energy levels in an atom

follows directly from the wave mechanical concept.

Institute of Lifelong, University of Delhi

Atomic Structure

The conditions which a wave function, , must satisfy before it is accepted are:

2

(ii) must be finite ( must be finite since it represents probability).

(iii) must be single valued, i.e., it must have only one definite value at a particular

point in space.

(iv) The probability of finding the electron over the entire space from to + must

significance except that it represents the wave amplitude. depends on the coordinates

of the particle. In some cases, it may turn out to be a complex function of the form:

= a + ib

where a and b are real functions of the coordinates and i is iota This complex

nature of is necessary if one is to use superposition of wave functions to describe

interference effects in matter waves. The complex conjugate of is:

2 2

* = a ib therefore, * = (a + ib) (a ib) = a + b If is real, * is identical to

2

.

2

Neither nor * has any physical significance but * (or ) has. The product of *

2

will always be real, whereas, () can possibly be imaginary.

In dealing with all forms of wave motions such as light waves, sound waves or matter

waves, the square of the wave amplitude at any point is interpreted

) is 2

as the intensity of the effect at that equal to point. So, the value of * or at

any point around the nucleus gives unity. measure of the electronic charge

density at that point, the density of Mathemati which varies from point to point

around the nucleus. According to the cally, it statistical interpretation, the electron

2

is still considered as a particle and the can be value of at any point is taken to

represent the probability of finding the electron at that point at a given instant.

According to uncertainty principle, the position of the electron cannot be determined with

2

certainty. Thus is interpreted as giving a direct measure of probability. Consequently,

the greater the intensity of wave function at a particular point, greater is the probability

2

of locating the electron at that point. When is high, electron density is high, i.e., the

probability of finding an electron is high.

is known as the storehouse of information because the information regarding any

property of the system like energy, radius etc., can be obtained from .

over the entire space (from to + ) is equal to unity. Mathematically, it can be

expressed as:

This is quite reasonable, as the probability of finding the electron in the entire universe

has to be 100%. Sometimes may not be a normalized wave function. In that case, we

multiply the function with a constant, N such that, the function N is also a solution to

the wave equation. The value of N is so chosen that the new function N be normalized.

Mathematically, the expression can be written as:

Atomic Structure

it is different from all the other wave

functions over the entire space (from to + ). Mathematically, it can be expressed as:

This is reasonable, as each wave function (that is solution to the wave equation) is

unique and different. Thus, any two wave functions (say, 1 and 2) should be

independent of each other, i.e., they should be orthogonal to one another.

The quantum mechanical study of any system consists of

(ii) Solving Schrdinger wave equation for the meaningful solutions of the wave functions

and the corresponding energies.

Hydrogen atom is the simplest chemical system consisting of one proton and one

electron. Schrdinger equation can be solved exactly for hydrogen-atom but not for

atoms having more than one electron. Assuming that the electron moves at a distance

around the stationary nucleus, then the nucleus can be taken as the origin in a

coordinate system. Schrdinger equation for the hydrogen atom can be written in terms

of the Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) as given below:

The solutions of the Schrdinger equation for the hydrogen atom lead to important

conclusions. It gives the values of energy, which agrees well with those obtained

experimentally, and also with those given by Bohr for his model of atom. It also gives

the allowed energy levels for electrons, which are same as that derived by Bohr.

The problem here is that of calculating the amplitude of electron waves at various

points in a hydrogen atom. These points can be defined by drawing a set of Cartesian (x,

y, z) axes through an origin at the nucleus of the atom and locating points by x, y, z

coordinates.

However, it turns out that the mathematics involved is much simpler if we use an

alternative way of specifying position namely the polar coordinates (r, , ). Since the

atom has spherical symmetry, it is apparent that in the polar coordinates, the separation

of the variables for the hydrogen system is easier than in Cartesian coordinates. Hence,

Schrdinger equation is transformed into polar coordinates. The coordinate r, measures

radial distance from the origin, is a lattitude and is a longitude. Since the electron is

moving in three dimensions, three coordinates are sufficient to describe its position at

any time.

The relation between the two coordinate systems is shown in the fig. 1.3. It can be seen

from the fig. 1.3 that the coordinates x, y, and z of the electron with respect to nucleus

Institute of Lifelong, University of Delhi

Atomic Structure

By replacing x, y, z coordinates with the polar coordinates in the Schrdinger equation,

we get,

The above equation is the Schrdinger wave equation for H-atom in terms of polar

coordinates.

A series of wave functions exist that are solutions to the above equation. A standard

method of solving the classical wave equation is by the method of separation of

variables. This can be done if it is assumed that the actual wave function (r, , ) is

the product of three separate wave functions each containing one of the three variables.

This can be represented as:

For convenience, the solutions are given in terms of radial part R(r) and angular part

().() or A(,).

When Schrdinger equation in polar coordinates is solved for the hydrogen atom, it gives

the possible energy states and the corresponding wave functions [(r, , )] (called

atomic orbitals or hydrogenic orbitals). The quantum mechanical solution of the

hydrogen atom successfully predicts all aspects of the hydrogen atom spectrum and

other phenomena that could not be explained by the Bohr model.

The application of Schrdinger equation to hydrogen atom and other atoms yields three

quantum numbers n, l and m, characterized as principal quantum number, azimuthal

quantum number and magnetic quantum number, respectively. These three quantum

numbers arise as a natural consequence in the solution of the Schrdinger equation. The

restrictions on the values of these three quantum numbers also come naturally from this

solution.

The fourth quantum number, s, characterized as the spin quantum number, arises from

the spectral evidence. Using refined spectroscopic techniques, it was found that in

high-resolution spectrum of H-atom, each spectral line is in fact a doublet, i.e., two

Institute of Lifelong, University of Delhi

Atomic Structure

closely spaced lines. This can be accounted for only if we assume that electron in its

motion around the nucleus, not only rotates but also spins about its own axis. So, four

quantum numbers are actually required in order to define an electron completely in an

atom. These quantum numbers describe the whole atomic state.

The principal quantum number, n, is a positive integer with values of 1,2,3, etc. The

principal quantum number determines the size and to a large extent the energy of the

orbital. n specifies location and energy,

+ 2+

For hydrogen and hydrogen-like species (e.g., He , Li ), it alone determines the energy

and size of the orbital. The lower the value of n, the more stable will be the orbital. The

principal quantum number also identifies the shell to which the electron belongs. Each

value of n corresponds to a shell, which can be represented by the following letters.

n = 1 2 3 4

shell = K L M N

A shell consists of one or more subshells or sublevels. Each subshell in a shell is assigned

an azuimuthal quantum number, l. The number of subshells in a principal shell is equal

to the value of n, i.e. for a given value of n, l can have values ranging from 0 to (n-1).

For example, for n =1, the only value of l is 0 and there is only one sub-shell. For n=2,

there are two subshells that have values of l as 0 and 1. For n =3, the values of l are 0,1

and 2 for three subshells. Subshells corresponding to different values of l are

represented by the following symbols:

l = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

notation = s, p, d, f, g, h

The symbols s, p, d and f stands for the initial letters as in the words sharp, principal,

diffuse and fundamental respectively which had been used to define the spectral lines.

The other symbols, i.e., g, h,. and so on proceed alphabetically. Table 1.4 shows the

permissible values of l for a given principal quantum number and the corresponding

subshell notations.

n 1 2 3 4

l 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 3

Subshell 1s 2s 2p 3s 3p 3d 4s 4p 4d 4f

The azimuthal quantum number gives an idea about the shape of the orbital. For

example, orbital in a s subshell is spherical, orbitals in a p subshell are dumbbell

shaped, orbitals in a d subshell are double dumbbell shaped and so on. It also describes

the motion of the electron in terms of orbital angular momentum. The orbital angular

momentum (L) of an electron is given by the relation:

For hydrogen atom, energies of the subshells belonging to the same shell are equal, i.e.,

ns = np = nd = nf. However, for atoms with more than one electron, the energy

increases slightly with an increase in the value of l, i.e., ns < np < nd < nf.

Each subshell consists of one or more orbitals and each orbital is identified by a magnetic

orbital quantum number ml, which gives information about the orientation of the orbital.

The number of orbitals in a subshell is given by (2 l + 1). For instance, when l

=0(s-subshell) there is only one orbital, when l =1(p-subshell) there are three orbitals,

when l =2(d-subshell) there are five orbitals and so on. This is also equal to the number

of values that ml may assume for a given value of l. Since ml determines the orientation

of orbitals, the number of orbitals must be equal to the number of ways in which they

are oriented. For a given value of l, the values of ml are -l,..0,.,+l.

Table 1.5 Values of ml for different values of l

Atomic Structure

l Subshell ml

0 s 0

1 p -1, 0, +1

It may be noted that the values of ml are derived from l and that the values of l are

derived from n. For any shell represented by the quantum number n,

The number of subshells (or values for the quantum number l)= n

2

The number of orbitals (or values for the quantum number ml)= n

Orbitals within a given subshell differ in their orientation in space, but not in their

energies, i.e., they are degenerate (having same energies). However, on applying an

external magnetic or electric field, the degeneracy is lifted (orbitals with different

orientations acquire different energies in presence of the magnetic or electric field).

Spin Quantum Number (s) and Magnetic Spin Quantum Number (ms)

The spinning of an electron is untenable from quantum mechanics. It arises from the

spectral evidence. The electron not only revolves around the nucleus but also spins about

its own axis. This spin of the electron is associated with spin angular momentum, which

is characterized by spin quantum number, s (= specifically for electrons). In an

analogous way of orbital angular momentum, L, the spin angular momentum can be

obtained by the expression:

The component of the spin angular momentum along the z-axis is given by the

expression:

A spinning electron acts like a tiny magnet. So, two electrons with opposite spins will

behave as two magnets with opposite poles towards each other and hence there is

attraction.

For every value of the quantum number ml (orbital), there are only two permitted values

of ms, i.e., + and . That is to say that every orbital can have not more than two

electrons and that too having opposite spins.

Atomic Structure

Interesting fact

The Mystery of the fourth quantum number (s).

theory and experiment. The advent of and the progress made in the field of quantum

mechanics in the first quarter of the 20th century had provided a much better solution to

the problem of hydrogen atom and addressed the anomalies in the Bohrs model,

however, still many experimental observations were still raising the eyebrows of many

scientist of the time and these observations were the following:

-On passing a beam of silver atoms through an inhomogeneous magnetic field they

unexpectedly observed a splitting of the beam into two parts.Stern-Gerlach

observation

A doublet in the spectra of alkali metals.

In order to address these questions, Wolfgang Pauli postulated that an electron can exist

in two distinct states and introduced a fourth quantum number in a rather ad-hoc

manner. This fourth quantum number is now called the spin quantum number, s and has

a value for electrons. It is interesting to know that Pauli did not give any interpretation

to this fourth quantum number and therefore this fourth quantum number was just a

mystery at that time though it provided explanation to various experimental observation

listed above. It was finally the attempt of George Uhlenbeck and Samuel Goudsmit in

1925 who showed that there are two intrinsic states of an electron, which are due to the

motion of the electron about its own axis and identified these two intrinsic states with

two intrinsic angular momentum or spin states. That is how the concept of spin and

thereby the spin quantum number came in to existence. It did not come from the

solution of the Schrodinger wave equation but due to the explanations for the various

experimental observations at that time.

As stated earlier, the spin quantum number, s, does not follow directly from the solution

of the Schrdinger wave equation for the hydrogen atom. It arose out of necessity to

explain two types of experimental evidences, which suggested an additional property of

the electron. One was the closely spaced splitting of the hydrogen spectral lines, called

fine structure. The other was the Stern-Gerlach experiment, which showed in 1922 that a

beam of silver atoms directed through an inhomogeneous magnetic field would be forced

into two beams. Both of these experimental situations were consistent with the

possession of an intrinsic angular momentum and a magnetic moment by individual

electrons. Classically, this could occur if the electron was a spinning ball of charge, and

this property was called electron spin. George Uhlenbeck and Samuel Goudsmit, in 1925,

proposed the idea that each electron spins with an angular momentum of one half Planck

-24

constant and carries a magnetic moment of one Bohr magneton (B= 9.27 x 10 J/T ).

Figure 1.4: An electron spin angular momentum vector of length units (one unit = h/2)

can take only two orientations with

respect to a specifed axis

Atomic Structure

The experimental evidences suggest just two possible states for this angular momentum

described by spinning of electron in either clockwise or in anti-clockwise direction. In the

presence of an external magnetic field an electron can have one of the two orientations

corresponding to magnetic spin quantum number, ms = as shown in Figure 1.4. The

magnetic spin quantum number, ms, is used to define the z-component of the spin

angular momentum.

wave equation was developed by Paul Dirac, which was

relativistically invariant, (called r, of Dirac's equation). In this

equation the additional quantum number s intrinsic to

the electron arose naturally during its solution.

An atomic orbital is a one-electron wave function (r, , ) obtained from the solution of

the Schrdinger wave equation. It is a mathematical function of the three coordinates of

the electron (r, , ) and can be factorized into three separate parts each

of which is a function of only one coordinate:

where R (r) is the radial wave function which gives the dependence of the distance,

the electron from the nucleus and are the angular wave functions giving the direction of

the electron in terms of the angles and respectively. On solving the three wave

equations (each involving only one variable) separately, it was found that the radial wave

function depends upon the quantum numbers wave function depends upon quantum

numbers l and m depends on quantum number ml only. The total wave function may,

therefore, be more explicitly written as:

2

It would be interesting to know how and || vary as a function of the three

coordinates r, and for different orbitals. Such representation of the variations of or

2

in space would however need a four dimensional graph -three dimensions for the

2

coordinates and the fourth for or || . It is not possible to show such variation in a

single diagram since we can draw only two-dimensional diagrams on paper. We can get

over this difficulty by drawing separate diagrams for: (i) variation of radial function and

(ii) angular function.

The solutions of radial wave functions are in the form of polynomials in r and are known

as the associated Laguerae polynomials. The normalized solutions of these wave

equations are quite complex. However, they reduce to relatively simple forms on

introduction of particular values of the parameters, i.e., n parameter and l parameter. (n

= 1, 2, 3

and l = 0 to n-1).

Mathematical expressions for radial functions of 1s,2s, and 2p are given in the Table

1.6.

S. No. n l Orbital Radial Wave function, R(r)*

1. 1 0 1s

2. 2 0 2s

3. 2 1 2p

Atomic Structure

atom and in wave mechanics it is the most probable radii.

The important aspects of radial functions may be made apparent by grouping constants

(Table 1.7). For a given atom, Z is constant.

*where k1s, k2s and k2p are the constants. All these radial wave functions represent

an exponential decay and that for n = 2, the decay is slower than for n = 1.

The radial part of the wave function R(r) gives the distribution of the electron with

respect to its distance, r, from the nucleus. The importance of these plots lies in the fact

that they give information about how the radial wave function changes with distance, r,

and about the presence of nodes. As stated earlier, the radial wave function depends

only on the values of quantum numbers n and l. It is mainly goverened by exponential

-zr/na

term, e .

In all cases wave function, R(r), approaches zero as r approaches infinity. However, the

actual shape of the curve is determined by actual wave function that depends on the

value of the quantum numbers n and l. For 1s orbital (n =1; l =0), the wave function

depends only on the exponential function. So, a plot of R(r) versus r is an exponential

curve as shown in fig. 1.5(a). In this plot, at r = 0, R(r) has a maximum value and as r

increases, R(r) decreases exponentially. For a 2s orbital (n =2; l =0), the wave function

R(r), in addition to the exponential term also depends on the term wave

through a minimum and then increases to an infinitesimally small negative value. This is

shown in fig 1.5(b). R(r) for the 2s orbital becomes zero at a particular value of r

between r = 0 and r = , at this point, the so called nodal point, R(r) changes sign

from positive to negative.In general, the number of nodes in ns-orbital is given by (n

1). There is only one node in 2s radial function. The radial plot for a 3s-orbital (n =3; l

=0), is shown in fig.1.5(c). The radial wave function, R(r), for the 3s-orbital becomes

zero at two points between 0 and therefore, it has two nodes.

Atomic Structure

Figure 1.5: The plots of the radial wave function, R(r), as a function

of distance, r, of the electron from the nucleus for (a) 1s-orbital

(b) 2s-orbital and (c) 3s- orbital

The radial function for a 2p-orbital (n =2; l =1), depends on the term in addition to

the exponential term . So, in the plot of R(r) versus r, the function R(r) becomes

zero at r = 0. It increases initially with r, reaches a maximum value and then decreases

to an infinitesimally small value.

The function R(r) remains positive throughout as shown in fig. 1.6(a), hence there are no

nodes in the 2p radial function. The radial wave function for 3p orbital [fig. 1.6(b)]

increases to a maximum in the beginning and then decreases passes through zero and

decreases further and finally increasing again to an infinitesimally small value. There is

one node in the radial function plot of 3p-orbital. The radial wave function plot for 3d-

orbital is shown in fig. 1.6(c).

The general formula for calculating the number of nodes in any orbital is (n l 1).

Figure 1.6: T he plots of the radial wave function, R(r), as a function of distance, r,

of

the electron from the nucleus for (a) 2p-orbital (b) 3p-orbital

and (c) 3d-orbital

Polts of Radial probability Density R(r)2 or R2

Animation

http://www.illldu.edu.in/mod/resource/view.php?id=5634

2

The square of the radial wave function R for an orbital gives the radial density. The

radial density gives the probability density of finding the electron at a point along a

2

particular radius line. To get such a variation, the simplest procedure is to plot R against

r (fig. 1.7 and 1.8). These plots give useful information about probability density or

relative electron densitys at a point as a function of radius. It may be noted that while

for s-orbitals the maximum electron density is at the nucleus; all other orbitals have zero

electron density at the nucleus.

Atomic Structure

Atomic Structure

2

Figure 1.7: The plots of the radial probability density, R , as a function of distance, r, of

the electron from the nucleus for (a) 1s orbital (b) 2s orbital and (c) 2p

orbital

2

Figure 1.8: The plots of the radial probability density, R , as a function of distance, r, of

the electron from the nucleus for (a) 3s orbital (b) 3p orbital and (c) 3d

Figure 1.6: T he plots of the radial wave function, R(r), as a function of distance, r,

of

the electron from the nucleus for (a) 2p-orbital (b) 3p-orbital

and (c) 3d-orbital

Polts of Radial probability Density R(r)2 or R2

http://www.illldu.edu.in/mod/resource/view.php?id=5634

FAQs

What is the role of quantum mechanics in chemistry, if it is a science dealing with

"laws of motion" of microscopic objects? Quantum mechanics caters to three

fundamental problems in chemistry namely, structure, bonding and reactivity. Solutions to

these problems depend on the detailed understanding of the behavious of these microscopic

particles in matter. Microscopic particles can never be at rest. An in depth understanding of

the behaviour of these particles is achieved by quantum mechanical studies.

orbital.

2

The radial density, R ,for an orbital, as discussed earlier, gives the probability density of

finding the electron at a point at a distance r from the nucleus. Since the atoms have

spherical symmetry, it is more useful to discuss the probability of finding the electron in

a spherical shell between the spheres of radius (r + dr) and r (fig. 1.9). The probability

of finding the electron between the shell with radius r and the shell with radius (r +dr) is

called the radial probability.

2

Multiplying by R

The probability of finding the electron in the spherical shell of thickness dr is equal to

Institute of Lifelong, University of Delhi

Atomic Structure

probability distribution function ( ), which gives the probability of finding the

electron in a shell at a distance, r, from the nucleus regardless of direction.

FAQs

2 2 2

What is the difference between and 4r R terms if both represent the

probability of finding an electron around the nucleus?

2 * 2

or represents the probability of finding the electron at a point. The value of at

a point represents the probability of finding the electron at that point. depends on

variables (x, y, z) in Cartesian system and (r, , f) in polar system. When we perform

the separation of variables of the wave function (r, , f) into radial part R(r) and

2

angular part Y(, f), the R term gives us the radial probability distribution of electron

around the nucleus because R, the radial part of wave function, is only dependent on r

(distance of electron from the nucleus) and not on the other two polar coordinates (

and f). The radial probability represents the total probability of finding the electron in a

spherical shell situated at a distance r from the nucleus and having a thickness dr.

distribution function, , versus distance, r) for 1s. 2s and 2p orbitals are shown

in fig. 1.10. An important contrasting feature of the radial probability distribution curves

with regard to radial wave function and radial probability density can be seen in the plots

of s-orbitals. It may be noted that at r = 0, the latter two functions have a maxima while

the former has a zero value. The maxima in the former is very close to r = 0 but not at r

= 0. This is justified as the radial probability distribution function, , also

The importance of these curves lies in the fact that they give the true picture of the

probability of finding the electron with respect to the nucleus as it has been established

that an electron can never exist at the nucleus (i.e., at r = 0).

1s orbital

The radial probability distribution function for the 1s orbital, [fig. 1.10.(a)], initially

increases with increase in distance from the nucleus. It reaches a maximum at a distance

very close to the nucleus and then decreases. The maximum in the curve corresponds to

the distance at which the probability of finding the electron is maximum. This distance is

called the radius of maximum probability or most probable distance. For 1s

orbital, it is equal to 52.9 pm, same as Bohr's radius for hydrogen atom.

Bohr was the first to introduce the concept of quantization of angular momentum

through the relation

mvr = nh /2

but this concept had no proof at that time and hence became a limitation of Bohr model

of the atom.

(a) (b) (c) Figure 1.10: The plots of the radial probability distribution

function, 4r2drR2, as a function of distance, r, of the electron from the nucleus for (a)

1s-orbital (b) 2s-orbital and (c) 2p-orbital.

Atomic Structure

2s and 2p-orbitals

The radial probability function curve for 2s orbital, [fig. 1.10.(b)], shows two maxima, a

smaller one near the nucleus and a bigger one at a larger distance. In between these two

maxima it passes through a zero value indicating that there is zero probability of finding

the electron at that distance. The region at which the probability of finding the electron is

zero is called a node. The most probable distance for a 2s electron corresponds to the

value of r where we have a bigger maxima.

The distance of maximum probability for a 2p electron, [fig. 1.10.(c)], is slightly less

than that for a 2s electron. However, in contrast to 2p curve, there is a small additional

maxima in the 2s curve, which lies at or around the maxima for a 1s orbital. This

indicates that the electron in 2s orbital spends some of its time near the nucleus. In

other words, the 2s electron penetrates into the inner 1s shell and therefore, is held

more tightly than the 2p electron. That is the reason why 2s electron is more stable and

has lower energy than a 2p electron.

Radial probability distribution curves for 3s,3p and 3d-orbitals are shown in fig. 1.11.

(a) (b)

2R 2

r, as a function of distance, r, of the electron from the nucleus for

(a) 3s-orbital (b) 3s,3p and 3d-orbitals.

For 3s orbital, there are three regions of high probability separated by two nodes. The

first two peaks indicate penetration of the electrons.

In general, the number of high probability regions = (n l) And the number of radial

nodes = (n l 1) For example, in a 3p-orbital, number of peaks = n l =31=2 and

number of nodes = n l 1=31 1=1

It can be seen in Fig. 1.11(b) that the most probable distance for 3s,3p and 3d orbitals

decreases in the order 3s >3p >3d. That is to say that the 3s orbital is more extended in

space than the 3p orbital which is in turn more extended than 3d orbital. However, the

radial distribution of 3s orbital spreads into the curve for 2s and 1s orbital. Similarly, the

radial distribution of 3p-orbital spreads into the curve for 2p orbital and so on. This is

called penetration of orbitals to inner cores. Hence, an electron in an outer orbital is not

fully screened or shielded by the inner electrons from the nuclear charge. It is only

partially screened from the nuclear charge. The extent of penetration decreases from s

to f orbitals, i.e. s > p > d > f. This variation in the extent of penetration greatly

influences the effective nuclear charge and relative energies of orbitals in multielectron

Institute of Lifelong, University of Delhi

Atomic Structure

2 2

Plots of Radial Probability Distribution Function , 4nr R(r)

http://www.illldu.edu.in/mod/resource/view.php?id=5634

The angular part of the wave function determines the shape of the electron cloud and

varies depending upon the type of orbitals involved i.e., s, p, d, f and their orientation in

space.

Atomic Structure

As already mentioned, the angular wave function '()() depends only on the

quantum numbers l and ml and is independent of the principal quantum number n. It

therefore means that all s orbitals will have same angular wave function irrespective of

the shell they belong to. Similarly, all px orbitals will have same angular wave function

and so on. The plots of angular wave function with and ) are 3-dimensional plots,

which give an idea about the shapes of the orbitals. Mathematical expressions for

angular wave functions of s-and p-orbitals are given in the table 1.8:

Figure 1.6: T he plots of the radial wave function, R(r), as a function of distance, r,

of

the electron from the nucleus for (a) 2p-orbital (b) 3p-orbital

and (c) 3d-orbital

Polts of Radial probability Density R(r)2 or R2

http://www.illldu.edu.in/mod/resource/view.php?id=5634

FAQs

What is the role of quantum mechanics in chemistry, if it is a science dealing with

"laws of motion" of microscopic objects? Quantum mechanics caters to three

fundamental problems in chemistry namely, structure, bonding and reactivity. Solutions to

these problems depend on the detailed understanding of the behavious of these microscopic

particles in matter. Microscopic particles can never be at rest. An in depth understanding of

the behaviour of these particles is achieved by quantum mechanical studies.

Table 1.8 Angular wavefunctions for s-and p-orbitals

l ml Orbital Angular wave functions

0 0 s

0 for ps-orbital

z is independent of angle and and therefore, its

plot is spherically symmetrical. This is shown in fig. 1.12. There are no angular nodes in

s-orbital. The angular wave function plots for p-orbitals give two tangent spheres. The

plots for px, py and pz orbitals are identical in shape but are oriented along the x, y and

z axes respectively.

Each p-orbital has an angular node (represented by a plane) as shown in fig. 1.13. The

angular wave function plots for d and f orbitals are four-lobed and six-lobed respectively.

There are two nodal planes in each d-orbital except for dz2 , which has a nodal surface

as shown in the fig. 1.14.

It is necessary to keep in mind that in the angular wave function plots, the distance from

the center is proportional to the numerical values of and in that direction and is not

the actual distance from the center of the nucleus.

Atomic Structure

Atomic Structure

Figure 1.14: Angular wave function plots for 3dxy and 3dz2-orbitals showing

the angular nodes.

The actual shapes of the orbitals are obtained by plotting square of the angular wave

function as it represents the probability distribution. On squaring, different orbitals

change in different ways. For an s orbital, the squaring causes no change in shape since

the function everywhere is the same; thus another sphere is obtained. For both p and d

orbitals, however, on squaring, the plot tends to become more elongated as shown for pz

in fig. 1.15. Instead of two tangent spheres, we get two dumbbells symmetrical about

z-axis. Similarly, for px and py orbitals, we get dumbbell-shaped lobes symmetrical

about x-axis and y-axis respectively. For d-orbitals, four dumbbell shaped lobes are

obtained except for dz2 orbital, which consists of two lobes along z-axis with a ring of

electron density around the nucleus in xy-plane as shown in fig. 1.20(a).

How do electrons cross nodes when they can never be present at the nodes?

A mathematical expression, which describes the probability that an electron of an atom

will be at a certain point in space, is called an atomic orbital. A complete picture of an

orbital can be obtained by summing up both the radial and angular distribution functions

together. These pictures of orbitals are called the plots of total probability density.

Ideally, probability distribution extents till infinity but most of it exists very near to the

2

nucleus. Chemists tend to think of electron clouds and hence, probably gives the best

intuitive picture of an orbital. Although, electron density may be shown either by shading

or by contours of equal electron density, only the latter method is quantitatively

accurate. Figure 1.16 shows the pictorial representation of the electron density in a

hydrogen like 3p-orbital

.

Atomic Structure

We can also construct boundary surfaces or boundary surface diagrams such that

they contain a volume within which there is a 99% probability of finding the electron.

Such a boundary surface for an s-orbital (l = 0) has the shape of a spherical shell

centered on the nucleus [fig. 1.17(b)]. For each value of n, there is one s orbital. As n

increases, there are (n-1) concentric spherical shells like the successive layers in an

onion [fig. 1.17(a)].

2

probability density || is shown as a collection of dots such that the density of dots in

any region represents the electron probability density in that region. The greater the

density of dots at a region, the greater is the probability of an electron to be found there.

These diagrams for s-orbitals are shown in [fig. 1.17(c)]. Charge cloud diagrams give a

better picture of orbitals as compared to boundary surface diagrams because in the

former plots, density of dots is proportional to electron probability density. Hence, just

by looking at these plots, we can predict where the probability of finding an electron is

maximum. Moreover, the radial nodes can be seen in these plots, which are not visible in

boundary surface diagrams.

Figure 1.17: Total probability density plots for s-orbitals (a) crossection of boundary

surface plots showing radial nodes (b) boundary surface diagrams for 1s,2s and 3s

orbitals (c) charge cloud diagrams for 1s,2s and 3s-orbitals.

Boundary surface diagrams for the three 2p-orbitals (l = 1) are shown in fig. 1.18(a). In

these diagrams, the nucleus is at the origin. Each p-orbital consists of two lobes on

either side of the plane that passes through the nucleus. The size, shape and energy of

the three orbitals are identical. They differ, however, in the way the lobes are oriented.

Since the lobes may be considered to lie along the x, y or z axis, they are given the

designations 2px,2py and 2pz. Like s orbitals, p-orbitals increase in size with increase in

the principal quantum number and hence 4p >3p >2p. Figure 1.18(b) shows the charge

cloud diagram for 2py orbital.

Atomic Structure

Figure 1.18: Plots for 2p-orbitals (a) boundary surface diagrams for 2px,2py and 2pz

orbitals (c) charge cloud diagram for 2py orbital.

Boundary surface diagrams for the three 3p-orbitals (l = 1) are shown in fig. 1.19(a).

There are three 3p-orbitals, as there were three 2p-orbitals. The shapes of the 3porbitals

are similar to those of the 2p-orbitals, except that the 3p-orbitals have a spherical node

that cuts each lobe into two distinct sections. Figure 1.19(b) shows the charge cloud

diagram for 3pz orbital.

Figure: 1.19: Total probability density plots for 3p orbitals (a) boundary surface

diagrams for 3px,3py and 3pz orbitals (c) charge cloud Diagram for 3pz orbital.

Boundary surface diagrams of the d-orbitals (l=2) are shown in fig. 1.20(a). There are

five d orbitals which are designated as dxy, dyz, dxz, dx2 -y2 and dz2. The shape of

3dz2 orbital is different from that of others but all five 3d orbital are equivalent in

energy. The d orbitals for which n is greater than 3 (4d,5d) have similar shapes.

Figure 1.20(b) shows the charge cloud diagram for 3dxz ,3dx2-y2 and 3dz2 orbitals.

Figure 1.20: Plots for five d-orbitals (a) boundary surface diagrams for 3dxz ,3dyz , 3dxy

3dx2-y2 and 3dz2 orbitals (b) charge cloud diagram for 3dxz , 3dx2-y2 and 3dz2

orbitals.

An important feature to be noted here is that all angular nodes except for dz2 orbital are

represented as two-dimensional planes or surfaces while all radial nodes are represented

as spheres. The general formula for calculating the number of nodes is:

= (n l 1) Number of angular nodes = l

For instance, in a 4p-orbital, there are in all three nodes out of which two are radial

nodes and one is an angular node.

Atomic Structure

The sign of the wave function can be obtained from its angular part. The wave function,

, can be either positive or negative depending on the values of and . The s-orbital

being independent of angle and is positive all through. The p-orbitals, on the other

hand, have one positive and one negative lobe as shown in the fig. 1.18(a). Angular

dependence of d-orbitals gives opposite lobes with identical signs as shown in fig.

1.20(a). In dz2 orbitals, two opposite lobes have the positive sign and the ring in the

xy-plane caries the negative sign. These positive and negative sign does not indicate the

electron density in any way; they only represents the sign of the wave function. The true

significance of the sign is reflected only when orbitals combine to form bonds.

For hydrogen like systems (i.e., systems with only one electron), the energies of orbitals

depend only on the quantum number, n and therefore as n increases the energy of the

orbital increases. Thus the relative energies of the orbitals of hydrogen like system have

the following order:

On the other hand, for multi-electron systems (i.e. atoms/molecules with more than one

electron), the relative energies of orbitals not only depends on the principal quantum

number, n, but also on the azimuthal quantum number, l. The following factors are

responsible for the relative energies of orbitals for multi-electron systems:

(ii) Penetration effect (depends on l shape of the orbitals)

Effective nuclear charge may be defined as the actual charge felt by the electron. The

electron present in the innermost orbital (i.e., 1s) experiences the full charge of the

nucleus. However, the charge experienced by the electron in the outer orbitals is

influenced by the repulsions from the inner core electrons. As a result of these

repulsions, the net charge experienced by an electron is always less than the actual

nuclear charge. The reduced effect of the nuclear charge by the inner electrons is called

shielding. Consider for example the lithium atom, which has the ground state electronic

2 1

configuration as 1s 2s . Lithium has three protons, which gives the nucleus a charge of

+3, but the full attractive force of this charge on the 2s electron is partially offset by

2

electron electron repulsion from the inner 1s electrons. Consequently, the 1s electrons

shield the outer 2s electron from the nucleus. The effective nuclear charge (Zeff),

experienced by an electron can be expressed as:

Zeff = (Z-) where Z is the actual nuclear charge (atomic number of the element) and

(sigma) is called shielding constant. The shielding constant is the sum of shielding

contributions from all the inner electrons and the electrons in the same shell. About 520

kJ of energy is required to remove the first electron from 1 mol of Li atoms and 7298 kJ

+

of energy to remove the second electron from 1 mol of Li ions. Thus, much more

amount of energy is required to remove second electron as the electron feels the greater

effective nuclear charge. Effective nuclear charge depends on distance of the electron

from the nucleus. The greater the distance, the lesser is Zeff.

As already mentioned, the radial probability distribution curves show that the 2s-orbital

also has a maximum at or around the maximum for 1s orbital. Thus the electrons in the

2s-orbital penetrates the lower 1s orbital as shown in fig. 1.21(a). This means that

although 2s electron is shielded by the 1s core yet the 2s electron penetrates it to some

extent and experiences somewhat higher nuclear charge. This penetration exposes the

electrons to more influence of the nucleus and causes them to be more tightly bound and

Institute of Lifelong, University of Delhi

Atomic Structure

thus lowering their associated energy states. For example, in a sodium atom, 3s electron

penetrates the inner core more than the 3p and is significantly lower in energy. This is

shown in fig. 1.21(b).

Figure 1.21: (a) Penetration of a 2s-orbital to the inner 1s core (b) Penetration of 3s and

3p-orbitals to the inner 1s core in a sodium atom.

Therefore, the order of energies depends on the degree of penetration, lesser is the

energy associated with that orbital. As discussed earlier, the degree of penetration

decreases in the order :

Hence, the order of energy is 2s <2p. similar consideration lead to 3s <3p <3d and 4s

<4p <4d < 4f. this means that within a given main energy level (n). the energy states

do not remain degenerate but increase in the order ns < np < nd < nf.

In multielectron atoms, the following rules or principles govern the filling of electrons

into various orbitals.

(i) Paulis exclusion principle

(ii) Hunds rule of maximum multiplicity

(iii) Aufbau principle

Pauli exclusion principle was established by an Austrian scientist Wolfgang Pauli in 1925.

According to this principle, each electron is described by a unique set of four quantum

numbers. In other words, no two electrons in an atom can have the same set of four

quantum numbers. Thus, even if two electrons have the same value for n, l and ml, they

must possess different spins, i.e., different values of ms, which are either + or - .

This is illustrated in Fig. 1.22.

Atomic Structure

opposite spins (+ and ). With two electrons of opposite spins, the s-orbital is said to

be closed. Using similar considerations, a p-subshell can accommodate a maximum of

six electrons, two in each px, py and pz orbitals. A d-orbital can accommodate ten

electrons and so on as shown in Fig. 1.23. Pauli exclusion principle has no fundamental

explanation but is an experimental fact.

exclusion principle

This rule deals with the filling of electrons into the orbitals belonging to the same

subshell (i.e., orbitals of equal energy, called degenerate orbitals). It states that pairing

of electrons in the orbitals belonging to the same subshell does not take place

until each orbital belonging to that subshell is singly occupied (i.e., has got one

electron each). This is justified as the electrons in two different orbitals of same subshell

experience lesser inter-electronic repulsions as compared to the electrons in the same

orbital. Thus, it leads to lower energy state. This is illustrated in Fig. 1.24.

Since there are three p, five d and seven f orbitals, therefore the pairing of electrons will

start in the p, d and f orbitals with the entry of 4th, 6th, and 8th electron, respectively.

The unpaired electrons present in the orbitals of same subshell should have parallel

spins.

Institute of Lifelong, University of Delhi

Atomic Structure

The preference of the electrons for parallel spins within a subshell is due to their Spin

multiplicity = (2S +1) where S is sum of spin quantum numbers of all the electrons

(Si). Multiplicity is originally derived from the number of lines shown in a spectrum. It is

related to the number of unpaired electrons. Hunds rule states that the ground state of

an atom will be the one having the greatest spin multiplicity. Spin multiplicity

corresponding to the number of unpaired electrons is given in Table 1.9.

Name of the State

Electrons Spin, S (2S+1)

0 0 1 Singlet

1 1/2 2 Doublet

2 1 3 Triplet

stabilizatio by exchange energy(discusse later). It can be more appropriately

n d

understood in terms spin multiplicity, which is given by the

formula:

3 3/2 4 Quartet

4 2 5 Quintet

2

Consider a p state

In the singlet state, the electrons are close together, and consequently, there will be

high interelectronic repulsion energy. In the triplet state this will be smaller owing to the

greater distance of the electrons. Therefore, triplet state with electrons of the same spin

will be more stable (possess lower energy).

This principle is based on the relative energies of the orbitals as determined by the

effective nuclear charge and the penetration effect. The word Aufbau in German, means

building up. The electronic configuration of atoms is built up by adding the electrons in

various orbitals in a stepwise manner. In the ground state of the atoms, the orbitals are

filled in order of their increasing energies. This means that electrons first occupy the

lowest energy orbital available to them and enter into higher energy orbitals only after

the lower energy orbitals are completely filled. The increasing order of energies of the

orbitals and hence the order in which the orbitals are filled is as follows:

1s <2s <2p <3s <3p <4s 3d <4p <5s 4d <5p <6s 4f 5d <6p <7s

As the energy of the orbitals depends on the quantum number n and l, the order of filling

the orbitals proceeds according to (n + l) rules. According to this rule, the lower the

value of (n + l) the lower is the energy of an orbital. For example, 3d (n + l =3+2 = 5)

is filled after 4s (n + l = 4 + 0 = 4). If two orbitals have the same (n + l) value, the

orbital with lower value of n has the lower energy. For example, 2p (n + l =2+1= 3) is

filled before 3s (n + l = 3 + 0 = 3).

This order of filling the orbitals may be remembered by using the method given in Fig.

Atomic Structure

1.25. Starting from the top, the direction of the arrows gives the order of filling of

orbitals.

The ground state electronic configuration of an element always corresponds to the state

of the lowest total electronic energy. The electronic configurations of most of the atoms

follow the basic rules as you have studied earlier. However, in certain elements such as

Cu or Cr, where the two subshells (4s and 3d) differ slightly in their energies, an electron

shifts from a subshell of lower energy (4s) to a subshell of higher energy (3d), provided

such a shift results in either completely filled or half-filled subshell. The valence electron

5 1 10 1 2 4

configurations of Cr and Cu, therefore, are 3d 4s and 3d 4s respectively and not 4s 3d

2 9

and 4s 3d . Similarly, molybdenum (Mo) and silver (Ag) have electronic configuration

5 1 10 1

4d 5s and 4d 5s respectively. Thus, generally only one electron jumps from lower

energy orbital to higher energy orbital, e.g., from 4s to 3d. However, in case of

palladium, two electrons are involved (the only case with a difference). The reason for

the tendency of the subshells to be completely filled or exactly half-filled is that it leads

to greater stability.

Atomic Structure

half-filled subshells has symmetrical distribution of electrons in them and are therefore

more stable. For example, Symmetrical distribution of electrons Cr atomic

number 24

2

2 Exchange energyp : Two electrons with the same charge tend to keep apart and

two electrons with different spin tend to come together. For example, consider a

configuration,

2

Charge correlation energy (e /r) dictates that a lower energy situation exists if the two p

electrons have different angular functions (i.e., different ml values). Spin correlation

affords a lower energy for like spins (i.e., same ms values). The chemical significance of

spin correlation of electron motions is that, since electrons are charged and repel one

another, the repulsion is less by an amount called the exchange energy for electrons of

like spin than for electrons of different spin. The exchange energy, Eex, is proportional to

the number of pairs of electrons of the same spin that can be arranged from n electrons

with parallel spins. The pair in this context means simply a group of two electrons with

same spin quantum number.

This exchange energy provides the basis of Hunds rule that electrons in the same orbital

have their spins parallel as far as possible. For example,

This difference of 9k in exchange energy is sufficient to compensate for the loss in orbital

energy in moving the electron from 4s-orbital to a 3d-orbital. Hence, half-filled subshell

is more stable. Similarly, stability for completely filled-orbitals can be proved.

Atomic Structure

Atomic Structure

configuration. If one keeps in mind the basic rules, which govern the filling of different

atomic orbitals, the electronic configurations of first few atoms can be written very

easily. The order may be continued for the higher elements also with minor anomalies

arising in few cases. There are two ways to write the electronic configuration of

elements. One is subshell notation which involves writing the electronic configurations of

the atoms in terms of the subshells being filled. For example, the subshell notation for a

neutral fluorine atom is:

2 2 5

F(Z = 9): 1s 2s 2p

diagram gives a little more information about the properties of individual atoms. The way

to draw orbital diagram is to have squares to represent each of the individual orbitals.

The difference between the two electrons in each individual orbital is the electron spin or

the magnetic spin quantum number. They are differentiated by drawing one with an

arrow up and one with an arrow down. For example, the orbital notation for a fluorine

atom is:

The Table 1.10 below gives the ground state electronic configuration of various elements

and Fig. 1.26 shows these configurations in the periodic table.

1 H 1s1

2 He 1s2

3 Li [He]2 2s1

4 Be [He]2 2s2

10 Ne

or 1s2, 2s2, 2p6

11 Na [Ne]10 3s1

12 Mg [Ne]10 3s2

13 Al [Ne]10 3s2 3p1

14 Si [Ne]10 3s2 3p2

15 P [Ne]10 3s2 3p3

16 S [Ne]10 3s2 3p4

17 Cl [Ne]10 3s2 3p5

[Ne]10 3s2 3p6

18 Ar

or 1s , 2s2, 2p6, 3s2 ,3p6

2

19 K [Ar]18 4s1

20 Ca [Ar]18 4s2

Atomic Structure

27 Co [Ar]18 3d7 4s2

28 Ni [Ar]18 3d8 4s2

*29 Cu [Ar]18 3d10 4s1

30 Zn [Ar]18 3d10 4s2

31 Ga [Ar]18 3d10 4s2 4p1

32 Ge [Ar]18 3d10 4s2 4p2

33 As [Ar]18 3d10 4s2 4p3

34 Se [Ar]18 3d10 4s2 4p4

35 Br [Ar]18 3d10 4s2 4p5

*Anomalous Configurations

Table 1.10 (Continued)

36 Kr or

1s2,2s2,2p6,3s2,3p6,3d10,4s2,4p6

37 Rb [Kr]36 5s1

38 Sr [Kr]36 5s2

40 Zr [Kr]36 4d2 5s2

*41 Nb [Kr]36 4d4 5s1

*42 Mo [Kr]36 4d5 5s1

43 Tc [Kr]36 4d5 5s2

*44 Ru [Kr]36 4d7 5s1

*45 Rh [Kr]36 4d8 5s1

*46 Pd [Kr]36 4d10 5s0

*47 Ag [Kr]36 4d10 5s1

48 Cd [Kr]36 4d10 5s2

49 In [Kr]36 4d10 5s2 5p1

50 Sn [Kr]36 4d10 5s2 5p2

51 Sb [Kr]36 4d10 5s2 5p3

*Anomalous Configurations

Table 1.10 (Continued)

[Kr]36 4d10 5s2 5p5

54 Xe

or 1s ,2s ,2p ,3s2,3p6,3d10,4s2,4p6,4d10,5s2,5p6

2 2 6

55 Cs [Xe]54 6s1

56 Ba [Xe]54 6s2

*57 La [Xe]54 5d1 6s2

*58 Ce [Xe]54 4f2 5d0 6s2

Atomic Structure

60 Nd [Xe]54 4f4 6s2

61 Pm [Xe]54 4f5 6s2

62 Sm [Xe]54 4f6 6s2

63 Eu [Xe]54 4f7 6s2

*64 Gd [Xe]54 4f7 5d1 6s2

65 Tb [Xe]54 4f9 6s2

66 Dy [Xe]54 4f10 6s2

67 Ho [Xe]54 4f11 6s2

*Anomalous Configurations

Table 1.10 (Continued)

70 Yb [Xe]54 4f14 6s2

71 Lu [Xe]54 4f14 5d1 6s2

72 Hf [Xe]54 4f14 5d2 6s2

73 Ta [Xe]54 4f14 5d3 6s2

74 W [Xe]54 4f14 5d4 6s2

75 Re [Xe]54 4f14 5d5 6s2

76 Os [Xe]54 4f14 5d6 6s2

*77 Ir [Xe]54 4f14 5d7 6s2

*78 Pt [Xe]54 4f14 5d9 6s1

*79 Au [Xe]54 4f14 5d10 6s1

80 Hg [Xe]54 4f14 5d10 6s2

81 Tl [Xe]54 4f14 5d10 6s2 6p1

82 Pb [Xe]54 4f14 5d10 6s2 6p2

83 Bi [Xe]54 4f14 5d10 6s2 6p3

*Anomalous Configurations

[Xe]544f145d106s26p6

86 Rn or 1s ,2s2,2p6,3s2,3p6,3d10,4s2,4p6,

2

87 Fr [Rn]86 7s1

88 Ra [Rn]86 7s2

89 Ac [Rn]86 6d1 7s2

90 Th [Rn]86 5f2 6d10 7s2

91 Pa [Rn]86 5f3 6d17s2

92 U [Rn]86 5f2 6d1 7s2

93 Np [Rn]86 5f4 6d1 7s2

94 Pu [Rn]86 5f6 7s2

95 Am [Rn]86 5f7 7s2

96 Cm [Rn]86 5f7 6d1 7s2

97 Bk [Rn]86 5f9 7s2

98 Cf [Rn]86 5f10 7s2

99 Es [Rn]86 5f11 7s2

Atomic Structure

101 Md [Rn]86 5f13 7s2

102 No [Rn]86 5f14 7s2

103 Lr [Rn]86 5f14 6d1 7s2

Rf

104 [Rn]86 5f14 6d2 7s2

(Rutherfordium)

Db

105 [Rn]86 5f14 6d3 7s2

(Dubnium)

Sg

106 [Rn]86 5f14 6d3 7s2

(Seaborgium)

Bh

107 [Rn]86 5f14 6d4 7s2

(Bohrium)

Hs

108 [Rn]86 5f14 6d5 7s2

(Hassium)

Mt

109 [Rn]86 5f14 6d6 7s2

(Meitnerium)

Uon

110 [Rn]86 5f14 6d8 7s2

(Ununnium)

The hydrogen atom has only one electron, which goes in the orbital with lowest energy,

1

namely 1s. The electronic configuration of the hydrogen atom is 1s ,meaning it has one

electron in the 1s orbital. The second electron in helium (He) can also occupy the 1s

2

orbital. Its configuration is therefore, 1s . The third electron of lithium (Li) is not allowed

in the 1s-orbital because of the Pauli exclusion principle. It therefore, takes the next

2 1

available choice, namely the 2s orbital. The electronic configuration of lithium is 1s 2s .

The 2s-orbital can accommodate one more electron. The configuration of the beryllium

2 2

2s

2 2 1 2 2 2

In the next six elements-boron (B, 1s , 2s 2p ), carbon (C, 1s 2s 2p ), nitrogen (N,

2 2 3 2 2 4 2 2 5 2 2 6

1s 2s 2p ), oxygen (O, 1s 2s 2p ), fluorine (F, 1s 2s 2p ) and neon (Ne, 1s 2s 2p ) the

2p-orbitals get progressively filled. This process is completed with the neon atom. The

2 2 6 1

electronic configurations of the elements from sodium (Na, 1s 2s 2p 3s ) to argon (Ar,

2 2 6 2 2

1s 2s 2p 3s 3p ) follow exactly the same pattern as the elements from lithium to neon

with the difference that the 3s and 3p-orbitals are getting filled now. In potassium

(K) and calcium (Ca), the 4s orbital, being lower in energy than the 3d-orbitals, is filled

first and is occupied by one and two electrons, respectively. A new feature shows up

beginning with scandium (Sc). The 3d-orbital, being lower

in energy than 4p, is filled first. Consequently, in the next ten elements, scandium (Sc,

1

3d

2 2 2 3 2 5 1

4s ), titanium (Ti, 3d 4s ), vanadium (V, 3d 4s ), chromium (Cr, 3d 4s ),

5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2

manganese (Mn, 3d 4s ), iron (Fe, 3d 4s ), cobalt(Co, 3d 4s ), nickel (Ni, 3d 4s ),

Atomic Structure

10 1 10 2

copper (Cu, 3d 4s ) and zinc (Zn, 3d 4s )the five 3d-orbitals are progressively

occupied. We may be puzzled by the fact that chromium and copper have five and ten

electrons in 3d-orbitals rather than four and nine as their position would have indicated

(with one electron in the 4s orbital). The reason is that fully filled orbitals and half-filled

orbitals have extra stability (i.e., lower energy) as discussed below. Thus, chromium and

5 10 4 9

copper adopt the d and d configurations in preference to the d and d configurations.

1 2 10 2

Similarly, from yttrium (Y, 4d 5s ) to cadmium (Cd, 4d 5s ), 4d-orbitals are

progressively filled. However, in the sixth period, 4f orbitals start appearing. Between

1 2 2 2

lanthanum (La, 5d 6s ) and hafnium (Hf, 5d 6s ), the 4f orbitals are filled and these

elements are called lanthanides. These lanthanides are listed at the bottom of the

periodic table. Similarly, in the seventh period, 5f orbitals are being filled and these

1 2

elements are called actinides. They occur between actinium (Ac, 6d 7s ) and

2 2

rutherfordium (Rf, 6d , 7s ) and are also placed at the bottom of the periodic table.

Some important points that should be remembered while writing the electronic

configurations of atoms are:

(i) To avoid writing of the electronic configurations in a lengthy way, usually the

2 10 18

symbols [He] , [Ne] , [Ar] etc., are used as the first part of the configuration. Such

a symbol stands for the electronic configuration of that inert gas and is usually called

the core of the inert gas.

(ii) Although the orbitals of lower energy are filled first but the electronic configuration

are written not in the order in which the orbitals were filled but in the order of

18 1 2

principal quantum numbers. For example, Scandium [Ar] 3d 4s . In this case,

although 4s is filled before 3d yet it is written after 3d. This is because the principle

quantum number for s-orbital (n = 4) is greater than for d-orbital (n = 3).

(iii)Unless otherwise mentioned, electronic configuration always means the electronic

configuration in the ground state of the element.

(iv)One should always remember that while writing the electronic configuration of an ion

(cation or anion), first the electronic configuration of basic atom is written and then

the electron is added or removed from the system otherwise there is always a chance

3+ 5 1 3+ 3 0 2+ 10

of error. For example, for Cr , first, Cr 3d 4s then Cr 3d 4s , for Cu , first Cu 3d

1 2+ 9 0

4s then Cu 3d 4s .

One may ask what is the utility of knowing the electron configuration. The modern

approach to chemistry, in fact, depends almost entirely on electron distributions to

understand and explain chemical behaviour.

Although the Aufbau principle and the order of filling of orbitals given previously may be

used reliably to determine electronic configurations, yet for elements with high atomic

numbers, some deviations are observed.

Table 1.11 are due to the extra stabilities associated with half-filled and completely filled

electronic configurations.

2. 29 Cu 3d9 4s2 3d10 4s1

3. 42 Mo 4d4 5s2 4d5 5s1

4. 47 Ag 3d9 4s2 3d10 4s1

5. 79 Au 5d9 6s2 5d10 6s1

(ii)

(ii)

The predicted electronic configuration of palladium (Pd, Z = 46) is 4d8 5s2, however,

Atomic Structure

the observed configuration is 4d10 5s0. This is the only case of its kind where two

electrons are misplaced from their expected subshells.

(iii) The predicted electronic configuration of niobium (Nb, Z = 41) is 4d3 5s2, however,

the observed configuration is 4d4 5s1. In the same period, ruthenium (Ru, Z = 44)

and rhodium (Rh, Z = 45) has the electronic configuration 4d7 5s1 and 4d8 5s1

respectively instead of the expected 4d6 5s2 and 4d7 5s2. This shows that the

preference for half-filled and fully filled configurations is not the only determining

factor but other factors such as nucleuselectron attraction and electron-electron

repulsion also plays some important role in determining the actual configuration.

(iv)In the sixth period, 4f and 5d subshells are exceedingly close in energy. At

lanthanum (Z = 57), the last electron does not go to 4f as predicted in Aufbau order

but is added to 5d subshell to give it a configuration 4d105s25p65d16s2. However, the

next electron for cerium (Z = 58) is added to the 4f subshell and the previous

electron in 5d in lanthanum is also shifted to 4f to give it a configuration

4d105s25p64f25d06s2.

(v) In the third transition series, Pt (Z = 78) has an observed configuration of

5d 96s1 as compared to the expected configuration of 5d86s2. There is a jump of one

electron from 6s-orbital to 5d-orbital although this jump does not give a completely

filled 5d-orbital.

Despite having certain limitations, Aufbau order of filling the orbitals is quite reliable in

predicting the electronic configurations and the chemical behaviour of the elements.

Atomic Structure

Summary

Atoms are the building blocks of elements. They are the smallest parts of an element

that chemically react like a bulk sample of the element. Towards the end of the

nineteenth century it was proved experimentally that atoms are divisible and consist of

three fundamental particles: electrons, protons and neutrons. The discovery of sub-

atomic particles led to the proposal of various atomic models to explain the structure of

atom.

wave-particle duality of matter and Heisenberg uncertainty principle. According to the

principle of wave-particle duality of matter, waves known as matter waves or de Broglie

waves are associated with moving particles. The wavelength of such waves associated

with a particle of mass m moving with velocity v is given by the de Broglie relation = h

/ mv. Heisenberg uncertainty principle is a consequence of the dual behaviour of matter

and radiation. According to this principle, it is impossible to determine simultaneously

both the position and momentum of a moving particle with certainty.

Quantum mechanics is the theoretical science of microscopic matter. It specifies the laws

of motion that microscopic particles obey. Its central equation is Schrdinger equation.

The solution of the Schrdinger equation of the hydrogen atom gives the possible energy

states of the electron and the corresponding wave functions, also known as atomic

orbitals. These atomic orbitals can also be used with a reasonable accuracy in

multielectron atoms. An atomic orbital is a one electron wave function () that defines

2

the distribution of electron density ( ) in space. Orbitals can be represented by charge

cloud diagrams or boundary surface diagrams.

The quantized energy states and corresponding wave functions which are characterized

by a set of three quantum numbers (principal quantum number, n, atimuthal quantum

number, l, and magnetic quantum number, ml) arise as a natural consequence in the

solution of the Schrdinger equation.

+ 2+

For hydrogen and hydrogen like systems (such as He , Li etc.) all the orbitals within a

given shell have same energy while the energy of the orbitals in a multielectron atom

depends upon the values of n and l. The lower the value of (n+l) for an orbital, the lower

is its energy. If two orbitals have the same (n+l) value, the orbital with lower value of n

has the lower energy. In an atom many such orbitals are possible and electrons are filled

in those orbitals in order of increasing energy in accordance with Pauli exclusion principle

(no two electrons in an atom can have the same set of four quantum numbers) and

Hunds rule of maximum multiplicity (pairing of electrons in the orbitals belonging to the

same subshell does not take place until each orbital belonging to that subshell has got

one electron each, i.e., is singly occupied). This forms the basis of the electronic

structure of atoms.

Atomic Structure

Exercises

-25

1. What is the wavelength of an electron if its kinetic energy is 1.375 10 J? (Mass of

-31 -34

electron = 9.1 10 kg, h = 6.63 10 J s).

3 -1

2. A beam of helium atoms moves with a velocity of 2.0 10 m s . Find the

-34

wavelength of particles constituting the beam. (h = 6.63 10 J s).

3. Calculate the uncertainty in the position of an electron if uncertainty in its velocity is

(i) 0.001%

-31 -1

(ii) zero (mass of electron = 9.1 10 kg, velocity of electron = 300 m s ). (Ans. (i)

-2

1.92 10 m (ii) )

1. Calculate the uncertainty in the velocity of a wagon of mass 2000 kg whose position is

known to an accuracy of 10 m.

2. Why cannot we overcome the uncertainty predicted by Heisenbergs principle by

building more precise devices to reduce the error in measurement below the h/4 limit?

3. Which orbital in each of the following pairs is lower in energy in a many electron

atom?

(i) 2s,2p

(ii) 3p,3d

(iii) 3s,4s

(iv) 4d,5f

6

1. Explain the meaning of the symbol 4d .

2. Write electronic configuration of Cu (Z = 29) and Cr (Z = 24).

3. Explain why 4s electrons are removed before 3d electrons in transition metals?

4. What are the n, l, m values for 2px and 3pz electrons?

5. An electron is in a 4f orbital. What possible values for the quantum numbers, n, l, m

and s can it have?

6. Which of the following orbitals are not possible: 1p,2p,2s,3f, and 4d.

7. If n is equal to 3, what are the values of quantum numbers l and m?

8. Write the correct orbital notations for each of the following sets of quantum numbers.

(i) n = 1, l = 0, m =0

(ii) n = 2, l = 1, m = -1

(iii) n = 3, l = 2, m = +1

dimensions and explain the various terms in it.

2

2. Explain the significance of and .

3. What are normal and orthogonal wave functions.

4. What is the difference between radial probability function and probability?

5. What do you understand by

2

(i) Radial probability density, R and

(ii) Radial probability function 4

2 2

r R ? How do they vary with r for 1s,2s and 2p atomic orbitals of hydrogen atom?

1. Draw radial probability distribution curves for n=3, l=0, and n=4, l=2.

2. Draw the shapes of d-orbitals indicating the sign of wave function.

3. What do you understand by a node? How many nodes are present in 3s and 4p-

orbitals?

4. Draw the shapes (boundary surfaces) of the following orbitals:

5.

(i) 2py

2

(ii) 3dz

2 2

(iii) 3dx -y

Atomic Structure

1. For an element with atomic number 20, which is the last or highest occupied subshell

of atomic orbitals? 1s,2s,2p,3s,3p,3d,4s, or 5s.

2. Which of the following two electronic configurations is more stable?

5 1

(i) [Ar] 3d 4s

4 2

(ii) [Ar] 3d 4s

8 2

(i) [Ar] 4d 5s

10 0

(ii) [Ar] 4i 5s

References

Web side References

http://www.shodor.org/unchem/basic/atom/index.html(atomic structure, quantum

numbers, concept of orbital, electronic configuration)

http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~acarpi/NSC/3-atoms.htm(introduction to atomic structure)

http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/PY106/PeriodicTable.html (quantum mechanical view of

the atom)

http://ritchie.chem.ox.ac.uk/Grant Teaching/The Quantum Theory of%20Atoms%20-

%20The%20Schrodinger%20equation.pdf(Schrodinger equation)

http://www.webelements.com (interactive periodic table)

http://umanitoba.ca/outreach/crystal/resources for

teachers/QuantumMechanical%Model%20of%20the%20Atom%20C12-2-

04.doc(Historical Development of the Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom)

Book References

- A First Course on String TheoryUploaded byrinkujajpur
- Quantum Mechanical ModelUploaded byVlad Vizconde
- IIT Jam Modern PhysicsUploaded byshreya debnath
- Jain and JainUploaded byRAJA
- Quantum Sum rulesUploaded byVahagn Mkhitaryan
- Quantum MechanicsUploaded byShivang
- download.pdfUploaded byMayura Srinivasa Ramanujam
- Quantam NumberUploaded byhimanshu yadav
- sipUploaded byLyka XD Polistico Moral
- Pot StepUploaded byKenn Senados
- Edda ReportUploaded by140557
- boher modelsdUploaded bysam
- [J] Basic Atomic and Molecular SpectroscopyUploaded byhaonv08
- MIT8_04S13_exam1.pdfUploaded byplfratar
- An Introductory Lecture on Feynman Path IntegralsUploaded byDARIO CASTRO CASTRO
- Compressions, The Hydrogen Atom, & Phase ConjugationUploaded byBryan Graczyk
- 4-SchroedingerIUploaded byhermas67
- Helium 09Uploaded bydaniele
- Xray CanadaUploaded byDaniel Anibal Gomez
- Chapter 1Uploaded bynadnotme
- Supplementary materialUploaded byPo48HSD
- Statistical Physics - Fermi Dirac Distribution Function & Its Aplications in ThermodynamicsUploaded byAyya Chann
- Honors Chemistry - Break PacketUploaded byKIPPNYCDocs
- (Www.entrance-exam.net)-Gujarat Class 12th Physics (English Medium) Sample Paper 1Uploaded byAnonymous wKG4Y0
- Workshop Cal. Sc.Uploaded byPrabhu Charan Teja
- Ch. Neuhauser and M. Thalhammer- Convergence of high-order time–splitting pseudospectral methods for Schrödinger equationsUploaded byVortices3443
- Fundamentals of Electronics - DC - AC CircuitsUploaded byapi-19917523
- On the Enhanced Reverse Beta Processes in Graphene-Iron Nano Structures at High Temperatures in Strong Magnetic Field CompositeUploaded bytedmozbi
- JNU-Phd-2010.pdfUploaded byGurvir Singh
- AGM Problem Sheet IUploaded byMarkoPll

- 2. Biological Molecules AS BiologyUploaded byADEEL AHMAD
- 026_.pdfUploaded byMEHDI
- Buck Scientific Aa Spec Operating InstructionsUploaded byÓskar Ortega Rodríguez
- Astm d2501Uploaded byCamilo Andrés Vergara López
- Hexoloy Sa Sic Tds 0Uploaded byHamzah Syaifullah
- Fatty Acid GC LabUploaded byc6h6cl
- ie401616fUploaded byAysu Göçügenci
- METODE_MAGNETIK_1Uploaded byAnjazumaki Aufa
- Heinonen.Pekka.Pisto-Lopez.Sannimaria.pdfUploaded byRumit Mehta
- Heat and Temperature (1).pptUploaded byLyza Javier
- A Review on Micronization TechniquesUploaded byilurohit
- Gas Absoprtion 1Uploaded byJohn Leonard Faz
- Kwinana Refinery 2007 2009Uploaded byKhalid Mahmood
- Completion, Workover Fluids and Salt Tables GraphUploaded byHeris Sitompul
- Primera Ley Sistemas CerradosUploaded bypimpollomp
- Hair Colour ChemistryUploaded byShanoof Sharaf
- As 4863.1-2000 Particle Size Analysis - Laser Diffraction Methods General PrinciplesUploaded bySAI Global - APAC
- 10.1038@nature23268Uploaded byAnonymous 4F2bux
- PlanetaryUploaded byIanjamasimanana Roger
- L21 Worksheet 1Uploaded bymaplecookie
- 1. FAIMS WhitepaperUploaded byAngela2003
- Megias Et Al 2009 - Sunflower Protein Hydrolysates Reduce Cholesterol Micellar SolubilityUploaded byDanielle Prado
- Fundamentals of Physics Extended, 10th Edition (2)Uploaded byMuhammad Fadhil
- ENGINEERING MECHANICS VOL l STATICS FIFTH EDITION chapter6.pdfUploaded byFrancisco Javier Villate Gaona
- 6- ThermochemistryUploaded bystrakenx
- solubility Lec 222Uploaded byPrince Tan
- Colligative PropertiesUploaded byakshatjn
- CMP2015_Wash Water Optimization on an Iron Ore SpiralUploaded byChristian Arnaldo Concha Lazarinos
- Transformer Insulating OilUploaded byAzminAg
- OBTL Form 3 (Syllabus) ver 2016-2017 (1)_CHE 323 11-17-16Uploaded byLorenz John Chu

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.