Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nicolas Nisse
Inria, France
Univ. Nice Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, I3S, UMR 7271, Sophia Antipolis, France
September 2015
x1 , x2 Decision variables
z = 50x1 + 200x2 .
x1 + 4x2 21.
z = 50x1 + 200x2 .
x1 + 4x2 21.
z = 50x1 + 200x2 .
x1 + 4x2 21.
x1 0, x2 0.
a 3 b
3 3
2
s d
2 1 2
c 1 e
a 3 b
3 3
2
s d
2 1 2
c 1 e
a 3 b
3 3
2
s d
2 1 2
c 1 e
a 3 b
3 3
2
s d
2 1 2
c 1 e
a 3 b
3 3
2
s d
2 1 2
c 1 e
a 3 b
3 3
2
s d
2 1 2
c 1 e
a 3 b
3 3
2
s d
2 1 2
c 1 e
Maximize f (su )
u N + (s)
Subject to: f (a ) c (a ) for all a A
f (vu ) = f (uv ) for all v V \ {s, t }
u N + (v ) u N (v )
f (a ) 0 for all a A
Example:
x1 + x2 = 200
We get:
x1 = 122
x2 = 78
Objective = 66100.
Algebraical methods:
Simplex method (George B. Dantzig 1949): skim through the
feasible solution polytope.
Similar to a "Gaussian elimination".
Very good in practice, but can take an exponential time.