1

Ibbott Ward - Mayor Tom Melican 7-11-2017

Cc: Hawdon Ward - Cr Alison Zandegu
5 enquiries@banyule.vic.gov.au

Tom,
despite my past request for information I am not aware that so far you did provide the
requested information to me, even so I view I am entitled to it.
10 Do understand that the system to complaint against valuation is not relevant to this request, this
as I am currently not disputing the assessment as simply I am seeking to find out first what the
assessment was based upon.
Obviously I wonder why we have Alison Zandegy as a councillor she neither seemed to have the
common decency to send me an email about what she considers to do about my request. This
15 even so provided as a Cc for a copy of my request.
QUOTE 2-3-2017 correspondence
I understand that Banyule City Council has at times local PROPERTIES assessed. I for one
therefore likes to know on what basis was for example the last assessment made? Was it
including my trees and now with having cut them the property has lessened in value? Has it
20 included the tree that was in the nature-strip but long since died and so the autistics has
changed and to perhaps the value. Did the value include say my neighbours property by
accident, I wonder? Whatever, I view to be entitled upon what criterias any assessment,
including any images and other details that were part of the assessment when made so I can
then consider if, in my view, this was at the time a possible appropriate assessment or not.
25 It is not ab out getting someone else do an assessment as after all I havent got a clue what
the last assessment was based upon. Sit a person just on a computer and add a certain
percentage to the value regardless if a property in the meantime might have been cleared
from any improvement and became a vacant land?
END QUOTE 2-3-2017 correspondence
30 While we have as an example governments pursuing that children are vaccinated the very basics
as to vaccination having mercury in it and as such dangerous to the child being vaccinated
somehow is of no concern to governments and others. As such it is not about so to say saving
lives but about some policy that a government has regardless of the actual harm to society.
We have this nonsense about global warming that it was predicted that Australian rivers would
35 be dry years ago.
We have this utter and very dangerous nonsense about vaccination
QUOTE

why flu shots don't work

40 A stunning new scientific study has solved the riddle of why flu shots don't work.

After decades of lies and propaganda from the junk science vaccine industry, we now know that growing
viral strains in chicken eggs causes them to mutate, making them largely ineffective for human immunity.

We've all been lied to for decades, in other words, about flu shots.

p1 7-11-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 2
My feature story brings you all the details. Read it here.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-11-01-vaccine-industry-in-panic-as-scientific-study-solves-riddle-why-
flu-shots-dont-work-immunization.html
Scientific Proof: Flu vaccine found to be completely ineffective because of how it is made, new study
5 finds
By Ethan Huff | Read the full story
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-11-02-scientific-proof-flu-vaccine-found-to-be-completely-ineffective-
because-of-how-it-is-made-new-study-finds.html
END QUOTE
10
Do you really desire to be creating as legacy you were part of a murderous bunch of politicians
who were more interested to serve the chemical industry then to protect the rights of children and
others?
Then I give another example how municipal/shire councils are providing citizenship ceremonies
15 to aliens when obviously those who are in councils are totally incompetent to understand what
they are doling.
On 4 December 2002 the Magistrates Court of Victoria (by consent) in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka
ordered that the S78B NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS be dealt with by the
High Court of Australia. This notice included:
20 QUOTE
NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER

1. The Defendant GERRIT HENDRIK SCHOREL-HLAVKA gives notice that the

proceedings involves a matter arising under the constitution or involving its interpretation
25 within the meaning of section 78B of the judiciary Act 1903.
END QUOTE
And
QUOTE
37. That I seek this Court to adjourn these proceedings and to place before the HIGH COURT OF
30 AUSTRALIA a CASE STATED as to have the High Court of Australia to first determine the following
matters;

(i) Can a person obtain Australian citizenship without first obtaining State citizenship (Quasi
States being Territories included)? If so, then by which constitutional valid manner?
35
(ii) Does the Commonwealth have constitutional powers to define citizenship? If so;
(a) under which provision? And
(b) in regard of aliens and immigrants; or
(c) in regard to any person within (b), as well as and including those born within Australia?
40
(iii) Does the Commonwealth have constitutional powers to declare and/or grant citizenship? If so,
(d) under which provision? And
(e) in regard of aliens and immigrants; or
(f) in regard to any person within (b), as well as and including those born within Australia?
45
(iv) Does the Commonwealth have the constitutional powers to determine the rights of a resident in a
State to obtain citizenship of such State? If so, by which constitutional powers?
END QUOTE

50 I (representing myself) subsequently succeeded in both appeals on 19 July 2006 unchallenged by

any of the Attorney-Generals and as such my legal challenge against the validity of the purported
Australian Citizenship Act 1948 remains and the purported Act therefore is and remains ULTRA
VIRES unless and until if ever at all a court pronounces against it and declare it to be INTRA
VIRES, which to my knowledge has not occurred since the court order of 4 December 2002 was
55 issued.

p2 7-11-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 3
QUOTE 19-11-2002 correspondence to Victorian Attorney-General
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Attorney General 19-11-2002
Victoria
5 Fax 9651 0577 AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
URGENT
Sir/Madam
Since 27-9-2002 I sought clarification about what, if any State citizenship I have
as to be able to obtain Australian citizenship, yet, in the recent 18 November 2002 response it
10 was stated;
As explained in my previous letter, citizenship is a matter for the Commonwealth,
not the States. You indicated that you were naturalized in 1994. As result of that, you
are an Australian citizen.
15
This utter ridiculous response was provided by RUVANI WICKS, Assistant Director, Civil
Branch of the Department of Justice.
Edmund Barton (later becoming the first Prime Minister of Australia and thereafter a judge of the
20 High Court of Australia) made very clear during the convention, that if it isnt in the
Constitution, then the Commonwealth had no legislative powers.
RUVANI WICKS refers me to the Commonwealth Government to sort out matters, however this
is clearly unacceptable, this, as the State of Victoria and not the Commonwealth deals or must
25 deal with State Citizenship!
Unless you can point out when there was a reference of legislative powers from the State of
Victoria to the Commonwealth approved within Section 128 of the Commonwealth constitution,
I view, there never was and still is no constitutional legislative powers by the Commonwealth to
30 determine State or any other citizenship!
END QUOTE 19-11-2002 correspondence to Victorian Attorney-General

As the Court on 4 December 2002 (by consent) ordered for the matter to be heard and
determined by the High Court of Australia and this so far never eventuated then in law my legal
35 objection remains valid, this in particular where none of the Attorney-Generals did in fact
challenge my written submissions whatsoever on 19 July 2006.
One therefore has to ponder on what legal basis do municipal/shire councils since 4 December
2002 hold citizenship ceremonies?
No one so to say can claim I am ripping of the community of being an incompetent
40 councilor as I am not and never was a councilor. But at least I do check matters. Are you?
When did you during your reign as councilor and during the years of being mayor
bothered to check the facts from fiction? Ignorance is no excuse! Is Banyule City Council
going to continue with the farce of citizenship ceremonies regardless of the purported
Australian Citizenship Act 1948 being and remaining to be ULTRA VIRES?
45
Getting back to my request regarding valuations of my property, can you just try to
manage to do the job you are getting paid for? I am entitled to be given appropriate details
how a valuation is done and upon what facts, if any.
50 This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to refer to all details/issues.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL (Our name is our motto!)

p3 7-11-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati