Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Amplitude (dB)
L ZL
-15
= 1, = -1 - 0.01j = 1, = -1 - 0.01j
= 1, x = 1, y = -1 - 0.01j 12 = 1, x = 1,
10 y = -1 - 0.01j
Efficiency (%)
10
0
8
-10
6
-20 4
-30 2
-40 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 26.65 26.7 26.75 26.8
k x /k 0 Frequency (MHz)
Fig. 5. Comparison of transmission coefficient for different metamaterial Fig. 6. Comparison of the efficiency for different WPT systems with different
slabs. The free-space case is also shown as a reference. types of metamaterial slabs. The free-space case is also shown as a reference.
the total transmission coefficient taking into account the wave IV. E NHANCEMENT OF W IRELESS P OWER T RANSFER
propagation (and decay for evanescent wave components) in U SING M ETAMATERIALS
the free-space region outside the metamaterial slab is then
All the above three types of metamaterials have been
2qy ky ejky (dL) applied to investigate the efficiency enhancement of the WPT
T = . (7)
2qy ky cos(qy L) j(qy2 + ky2 ) sin(qy L) system shown in Fig. 1. The overall system efficiency can
For isotropic metamaterials = = 1 and = 1, = be approximated as |S21 |2 . Figure 6 shows the comparison
1, qy can be calculated as of the efficiency for different WPT system configurations
from numerical simulations, in which the distance between
qy = k02 kx2 , (8) the loop antenna is kept unchanged, i.e. d = 3 m, and the
thickness of the metamaterial slabs is L = 0.6 m. It is
where k0 is the free-space wave number. For anisotropic clear that all metamaterial slabs contribute to the enhancement
metamaterial = x = 1, y = 1, qy is given by of system efficiency, comparing to the free-space case. The
DNG and IMNG slabs provide similar improvement since their
k2
qy = k02 x , (9) transmission coefficients are also similar, which means that
y
the resonance at about kx = 1.1k0 does not offer significant
Figure 5 shows the calculated transmission coefficient for advantage in amplification of evanescent waves. Nonetheless,
the above three types of metamaterials, as well as for the free- the efficiency of the WPT systems using DNG and IMNG
space case when no metamaterials are present between the is almost double that of the free-space case. For the case
loop antennas. The thickness of the slabs is L = 0.6 m, and the of the AMNG slab, the resonance at higher wave numbers
distance between the source and destination planes is d = 3 m. helps improve the system efficiency by nearly three times. The
In the calculations, a small amount of loss (tan = 0.01) for results demonstrate that the anisotropy of negative material
negative material parameters is also included to characterize parameters in metamaterials is essential in the efficiency
realistic metamaterials. It can be seen that for the free-space enhancement for WPT systems.
case, the higher the value of the wave number kx , the faster For illustration purposes, the calculated magnetic field dis-
the wave decays. For the case of DNG, the wave decays in tributions for the WPT systems with and without the AMNG
a much slower rate, especially for larger wave numbers. This slab are plotted and shown in Fig. 7. It can be seen that for the
is because the evanescent wave components (for kx > k0 ) free-space case, only a small fraction of the magnetic field is
are amplified when propagating inside the DNG, which is coupled to the receiving loop, thus the system efficiency is low.
also the case for the IMNG and AMNG, as shown in Fig. 5. On the other hand, when the AMNG slab is placed between the
However, for IMNG and AMNG, a resonance occurs for kx loop antennas, evanescent waves are amplified inside the slab
just above k0 , and another resonance is also present for AMNG and then further coupled to the receiving loop, contributing to
at about kx = 4.4k0 . In fact the amplification of evanescent a significant enhancement of the system efficiency.
wave components is essential in the efficiency enhancement of For WPT systems, it is often useful to investigate how
WPT systems, and it can be predicted from the comparison in the system efficiency varies with distance. Figure 8 shows a
Fig. 5 that the AMNG slab may provide a better performance. comparison of system efficiency at different distances (sepa-
Receiving loop positive effect. When the distance is small, although the
AMNG slab amplifies evanescent waves, the mutual coupling
affects the impedance matching of the loop antennas and
decrease their efficiency. As a result, the improvement of
overall system efficiency is less significant.
V. C ONCLUSION
In conclusion, an investigation of efficiency enhancement
for WPT systems using metamaterials is presented in this
paper. Using plane-wave analysis, it is found that evanescent
= 1, x = 1, waves can be amplified the most when anisotropy of negative
y = -1 - 0.01j material parameters is present in metamaterials, which is
essential in the efficiency improvement for WPT systems. Nu-
merical simulations show that comparing to the conventional
y
WPT system, the system using metamaterials has a much
x higher efficiency, and the efficiency enhancement using the
Transmitting loop
AMNG slab is nearly three times. Further work may include
Fig. 7. Comparison of magnetic field distributions for WPT systems with the realization of metamaterials using split-ring resonators
and without the AMNG slab. (SRRs) [9], as well as the investigation of how different system
parameters such as the thickness of the metamterial slab, affect
35 the performance of the metamaterial-enhanced WPT systems.
Without the AMNG slab
With the AMNG slab
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
30
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support
25 by The Thailand Research Fund (TRF) Ref. MRG5580226.
Efficiency (%)
R EFERENCES
20
[1] W. C. Brown, The history of wireless power transmission, Solar
Energy, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3-21, 1996.
15 [2] W. C. Brown, Experimental airborne microwave supported platform
descriptive note: Final rept., Jun 1964 - Apr 1965.
[3] A. Kurs, A. Karalis, R. Moffatt, J. D. Joannopoulos, P. Fisher, and
10 M. Soljiacic, Wireless power transfer via strongly coupled magnetic
resonances, Science, vol. 317, pp. 83-86, 2007.
[4] E. Nader, and R. W. Ziolkowski, Metamaterials: Physics and Engineer-
5 ing Explorations, Wiley & Sons, 2006.
[5] B. Wang, K. H. Teo, T. Nishino, W. Yerazunis, J. Barnwell, and J.
0 Zhang, Experiments on wireless power transfer with metamaterials,
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 98, p. 254101, 2011.
[6] J. Choi, and C. Seo, High-efficiency wireless energy transmission using
Distance (m) magnetic resonance based on metamaterial, Progress In Electromagnet-
ics Research, vol. 106, pp. 33-47, 2010.
Fig. 8. Comparison of system efficiency at difference distances between the [7] Y. Urzhumov, and D. R. Smith, Metamaterial-enhanced coupling be-
transmitting and receiving loop antennas for WPT systems with and without tween magnetic dipoles for efficient wireless power transfer, Phys. Rev.
the AMNG slab. B, vol. 83, p. 205114, 2011.
[8] The American Radio Relay League, Small high efficiency loop sntennas
for transmitting, The ARRL Antenna Handbook 15th ed., pp. 5-14, 1988.
[9] J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, D. J. Robbins, and W. J. Stewart, Magnetism
ration between the transmitting and receiving loop antennas) from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena, IEEE Trans.
for WPT systems with and without the AMNG slab. For the Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 47, pp. 2075-2084, 1999.
case of without the AMNG slab, it can be seen that the
peak efficiency when two loop antennas are placed in close
proximity is about 27%, which agrees well with theoretical
prediction as the analytically calculated efficiency of each loop
antenna is around 50% [8]. When the distance between two
loop antennas is increased, the system efficiency decreases
accordingly. When the AMNG slab is placed between the
transmitting and receiving loop antennas, the improvement
of system efficiency is more significant when the distance
between the loop antennas is large. This is due to the fact that
at larger distances, the coupling between loop antennas and the
AMNG slab is negligible and the AMNG slab only introduces