17519348-James-Perrett-

Curriculum-2A-Biology-
Assessment-2
by James Perrett

FILE 17519348-JAMES-PERRET T -CURRICULUM-2A-BIOLOGY-

ASSESSMENT -2.DOCX (862.19K)
T IME SUBMIT T ED 24-APR-2017 06:59PM WORD COUNT 5996
SUBMISSION ID 803842306 CHARACT ER COUNT 35435
17519348-James-Perrett-Curriculum-2A-Biology-Assessment-2
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

31
Part A: Your voice is clear and audible. You make the
learning intention clear but then you stop addressing
the students and discuss activities that could be
done? I think you have misunderstood the nature of
the task. You needed to actually make an
instructional video aimed at students. You have
shown knowledge of the content however.

/50 Part B: T his is a creative task but some students will

be overwhelmed f rom the text dense inf ormation.
Some aspects could be condensed. You don't need
to explain the concept of the task to the students.

Part C: You have identif ied relevant research

however there are a lot of broad statements that
you do not explicitly connect to your practice.

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

PAGE 5

Comment 1
as discussed in tutorials be aware that NESA have their own policy in regards to late
submissions that all schools must implement

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

PAGE 9
PAGE 10

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

PAGE 14

PAGE 15

PAGE 16

PAGE 17

PAGE 18

PAGE 19

PAGE 20

PAGE 21

Comment 2
?

PAGE 22

PAGE 23

PAGE 24

PAGE 25

PAGE 26
RUBRIC: SC2 BIO/CHEM ASSIGN. 2-1H 20 16

CONT ENT REP. Pass

FAIL Content representation is not complete, f ails to demonstrate accurate knowledge

of the topic, and/or f ails to use the prescribed medium in an appropriate way Lacking
evidence of completed lecture/tutorial activities.

PASS Content representation is complete and meets the required standards Content
representation demonstrates mostly accurate knowledge of the topic Content
representation uses the prescribed medium in mostly appropriate ways All required
evidence of completed lecture/tutorial activities are included

CREDIT Content representation is complete and meets the required standards Content
representation demonstrates accurate and thorough knowledge of the topic
Content representation uses the prescribed medium in appropriate ways All required
evidence of completed lecture/tutorial activities are included

DISTINCTION Content representation is complete and meets the required standards Content
representation demonstrates advanced knowledge of the topic Content
representation uses the prescribed medium in advanced/creative ways All required
evidence of completed lecture/tutorial activities are included

HIGH DISTINCTION Content representation is complete and meets the required standards Content
representation demonstrates sophisticated knowledge of the topic Content
representation uses the prescribed medium in highly creative/sophisticated ways All
required evidence of completed lecture/tutorial activities are included

ASSESSMENT Credit

FAIL Assessment materials are highly unorganised, or f ail to demonstrate accurate

knowledge of the topic or assessment design Assessment materials are not
classroom-ready, not complete, or not grade-level appropriate Assessment
materials are not original or modif ied f rom original source

PASS Assessment materials are organised and demonstrate mostly accurate knowledge
of the topic and assessment design Assessment materials are classroom-ready,
complete, and grade-level appropriate Assessment materials are original or modif ied

CREDIT Assessment materials are organised and demonstrate accurate and thorough
knowledge of the topic and assessment design Assessment materials are
classroom-ready, complete, and grade-level appropriate Assessment materials are
original or modif ied

DISTINCTION Assessment materials are organised and demonstrate advanced knowledge of the
topic and assessment design Assessment materials are classroom-ready, complete,
and grade-level appropriate Assessment materials are original or modif ied

HIGH DISTINCTION Assessment materials are organised and demonstrate sophisticated knowledge of
the topic and assessment design Assessment materials are classroom-ready,
complete, and grade-level appropriate Assessment materials are original or modif ied
JUST IFICAT ION Pass

FAIL 0-5 peer-reviewed ref erences used Justif ication f ails to adequately provide
complete, explicit, well-substantiated claims due to not being explicit or making
several claims that are not well-substantiated Justif ication f ails to provide
appropriate and clear connections between science education literature and Parts A/B
Work lacks structure; little evidence paper has been edited; terminology
inappropriate; f requent spelling/ typographic errors. Poor paraphrasing; over
reliance on quotes; no or inaccurate ref erence list and poor in-text ref erencing; not
submitted to T urnitin or high level of matches.

PASS At least 6 ref erences used Justif ication provides complete, explicit, well-
substantiated claims, and demonstrates mostly accurate knowledge Justif ication
provides mostly appropriate and clear connections between science education
literature and Parts A/B Generally clear; paper/presentation has introduction, body
and conclusion; developed with students voice; sentences coherent and
grammatically correct; within word/time length; some typographic and /or spelling
errors. Generally accurate APA ref erencing; submitted to T urnitin; originality report
detects some insignif icant matches. Some appropriate use of evidence but needs to
be better integrated.

CREDIT At least 6 ref erences used Answers to justif ication questions provide complete,
explicit, well-substantiated claims and demonstrates accurate and thorough
knowledge Justif ication provides appropriate and thorough connections between
science education literature and Parts A/B Well structured and coherent text;
ef f ective grammatical expression; adheres to word/time length; uses appropriate
terminology; minor typographic and /or spelling errors. Mostly accurate APA
ref erencing; submitted to T urnitin; low percentage f or originality report. Analysis well
developed with students voice and supported by literature and research.

DISTINCTION At least 6 ref erences used Answers to justif ication questions provide complete,
explicit, well-substantiated claims and demonstrate advanced knowledge
Justif ication provides advanced connections between science education literature
and Parts A/B Clear and concise structure; strengthened by relevant research;
grammar and syntax mostly correct; cohesive text within word/time length;
discriminating use of appropriate vocabulary; f ew typographic or spelling errors.
Consistently accurate APA ref erencing; competent integration of evidence, low
percentage f or T urnitin; original work with insignif icant matches.

HIGH DISTINCTION At least 6 ref erences used Answers to justif ication questions provide complete,
explicit, well-substantiated claims and demonstrate sophisticated knowledge
Justif ication provides sophisticated connections between science education literature
and Parts A/B Well structured paper or innovative presentation; explicitly identif ies
the key issues; cohesive, grammatically correct structure; very f ew typographic or
spelling errors. Consistently accurate APA ref erencing; highly competent integration
of evidence, submitted to T urnitin; original work with insignif icant matches.