Ipcrf-Master Teachers

Name of Employee: ________________________
Position: Principal 1
Review Period: June 2016-March 2017
School: _______________________
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Instructional Instructional Leadership Performs instructional supervision to all Jan-Dec

supervision teachers to achieve learning outcomes at
to achieve the end of the school year
learning
outcomes
performed
classroom Conducts and submits 100 classroom observation

observation and monitoring at the end of the school
& monitoring year
conducted
Performs instructional supervision to enhance

Instructional curriculum implementation within the school year
supervision
performed
Manages instructional system by assigning teachers
where they best fit and organizing special classes
at the start of the year
child friendly Learning Environment Establish systems for safe and child
school systems friendly learning and school environment
established for students
Physical Improved physical environment

environment for student learning
improved
Technical Human Resource Provides technical assistance to

Assistance Management and teachers on matters pertaining to
provided Development enhancement of classroom mngt,
skills and instructional competence.
INSET & LAC Conducts TNA-based in-service

conducted trainings and learning action cell.
school's Parents' Involvement Established school, family and
stakeholders and Community community partnership for performance
partnership Partnership
established
School Leadership,
Data-based Management and Performs data-based strategic planning to improve
strategic Operations schools performance
planning
performed
Sound school Performs School Leadership,
leadership & Management and Operations
management functions
performed
school Improve school performance

performance in the areas:
improved enrolment rate
dropout rate
survival rate
promotion rate
Plus Factor Facilitates training in Division/
regional level
Acted chair of a committee in the

region/division/district
Ratee:
______________________________
Principal 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
Name of Rater:
Position: ASDS
Date of Review: December 2016
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

per KRA Obj QUALITY
40% 15% 5- 5pts & above increase of NAT
10.0% 4- 4 pts increase of NAT
3- 3 pts increase of NAT
2- 2 pts increase of NAT
1- 1 pts & below increase of NAT
10.00% 5- 100% & above of teachers have 90%-100% GSA

4- 86%-99% of teachers have 80%-89% GSA
1- 64% & below of teachers have 70%-89% GSA
10% 5- 100% & above classroom observation following STAR

model w/agreement conducted at the end of school year
4- 86-99% classroom observation following STAR model
w/ agreement conducted at the end of school year
3- 75-85% classroom observations following STAR model
2- 65-74% classroom observations following STAR model
1- 64% & below classroom observations following STAR model
10% 5- Collected, analyzed and utilized data to identify and plan
needed curriculum interventions
Organizes projects teams to plan and implement curriculum interventions
Recommended localized curriculum (MTB) for instruction
Organizes appropriate classes to diverse students needs
Adopts ADM & flexible learning options
4- 4 of 5 requirements satisfied (with evidences)
2- Some requirements satisfied w/out evidences
1- requirements and reports largely missing
5-5 & above of instructional system managed(organization of classes,
assignment of teachers,special classes,master/class program,
teaching loads) with evidences
2- Some requirements satisfied w/out evidences
1- requirements and reports largely missing
10% 5- 100% and above accomplishments on the following

5% (supported by evidence such as school policy, reports,information
materials,advocacy activities, regular meetings, inventory)
Adhered to CFSS,
Institutionalized Child protection mechanisms& processes
Has clear DRRM mobilization plans
4- All mechanisms are present except for some minimal
requirements.
3- All mechanisms are present but w/o evidences

2- Incomplete mechanisms and absence of reports.
1-mechanisms and reports are missing
5% 5- 17 & above of classrooms & facilities are structured & well-maintained
4- 14-16 of classrooms & facilities are structured & well-maintained
1- 7 & below of classrooms & facilities are structured & well-maintained
20% 5- 17 and above of teachers provided with technical assistance
10% with corresponding evidences: (observation reports, TNA results
performance analysis & recommendations for devt interventions(semestral)
4- 14-16 of teachers provided with technical assistance
with corresponding evidences(semestral)
with corresponding evidences
1- 6 & below of teachers provided with technical assistance
2.5% 5- 17 & above of teachers attended(2) INSET with TCR
4- 14-16 of teachers attended(2) INSET with TCR
3- 10-13 of teachers attended(2) INSET
2- 7 -9 of teachers attended(2) INSET
1- 6 & below of teachers attended(2) INSET
2.50% 5- 17 & above of teachers attended LAC sessions with TCR
4- 14-16 of teachers attended LAC sessions with TCR
1- 6 & below of teachers attended LAC sessions with TCR
w/ TCR
5% 5 -Has stakeholders partnership/mobilization plan agreements
(complete with reports and documentations of meetings,
Organized programs with stakeholders,esp. parents for academic
and other purposes (esp. Strategic planning)
Obtained resources for the school through stakeholders partnership
4 -Has mobilization plan and occasionally meets stakeholders in
meetings and activities but some elements (e.g. not enough
resources raised)
3- Has mobilization plan and ocassionally meets are missing

stakeholders but not resulting to resources generated and
evidences
2-Poor mobilization skills and seldom meets stakeholders
1-No evidence in this area
20% 5-100% & above of plans,programs & projects based on data to improve
10% schools performance captured in SIP/AIP using CI process with 100% evidences
4-86%-99% of plans,programs & projects based on data to improve schools
performance captured in SIP/AIP using CI process with 90% evidences
3-75%-85% of plans,programs & projects based on data to improve schools

perforamce captured in SIP/AIP using CI process with 80% evidences
2-65%-74% of plans,programs & projects ti improve pupils performance
captured in SIP/AIP using CI process with 70% evidences
1-64% & below of plans,programs & projects ti improve pupils performance

10% 5- With clear financial management system for the school
supported by evidences such as reports, account logs
, database sytem
Allocated/Prioritized funds for programs and school
facilities improvement and maintenance
Monitored, accounted and reported utilization of school fund

Reported sources and uses of funds
Ensured quality standards for facilities given to the school
Coordinated with stakeholders on resource mobilization
Maintained school EMIS and regularly submit
MIS reports to the Division Office
4- With clear financial and resource management
system but one or equirements were missing were
negligible (with complete evidence
3-With clear financial and resource management
system but two requirements and/or reports were lacking
2-Financial Management System and reporting were
in its initial stages
1-No Financial Managment System and/or reports
observed
10%
5- 100% of the target met per indicator
2.50% 4- 86-99% of the target met per indicator
2.50% 3- 75%-85% of the target met per indicator
2.50% 2- 65%-74% of the target met per indicator
2.50% 1- 64% & below of the target met per indicator
5- facilitated 3 trainings at regional/ 5 division
4-facilitated 2 trainings in region/4 in division
5- acted as chair of working committee in the region
4- acted as chair of working committee in the division
3- acted as chair of 3 working committees in the district
1- acted as chair of 1 working committee in the district
Rater: ________________________________________
PSDS
ENT & REVIEW FORM
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T
5- 100% & above of k -grade 6 teachers 5- 100% & above of K to grade 6 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance given instructional assistance monthly
4- 86%-99% of k to grade 6 teachers 4- 86%-99% of K to grade 6 teachers
3- 75%-85% of k to grade 6 teachers 3- 75%-85% of K to grade 6 teachers
given appropriate & timely instructional assistance given instructional assistance monthly.
2- 65%-74% of K to grade 6 teachers 2- 65%-74% of K to grade 6 teachers
1- 64% & below of K to grade 6 teachers 1- 64% & below of K to grade 6 teachers
5- 100% & above of K to grade 6 teachers 5- 100% & above of K to grade 6 teachers
1- 64% & below of K to grade 6 teachers 1- 64% & below of K to grade 6 teachers
5- 10 & above classroom observation
submitted monthly
4- 9 classroom observations
submitted monthly
submitted monthly
submitted monthly
1- 6 & below classroom observations
submitted monthly
5-100% of curriculum intervention plans implemented 5- 100% of curriculum intervention plans
successfully within the approved budget. implemented based on timeline
4-86%-99% of curriculum intervention plans implemented 4- 86%-99% of curriculum intervention plans
successfully but exceeded 10% of the approved budget. implemented1- 2 weeks late
successfully but exceeded 20% of the approved budget. implemented 3-4 weeks late
1-64% & below of curriculum intervention plans implemente1- 64% & below of curriculum intervention plans
5- 100% of instructional system managed
1 week before opening of classes
4- 86%-99% of instructional system managed
during the opening of classes
1 week after the opening of classes
2 weeks after the opening of classes
1- 64% & below of instructional system managed
3 weeks after the opening of classes
ions(semestral)
1-64% and below accomplishments, strategic planning
process and evidences are largely absent
TUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
Ave
Key Result Areas
(KRAs)
Instructional Leadership
Learning Environment
Human Resource Management and

Development
Parents Involvement and

Community Partnership
School Leadership, Management and
Operations
Objectives
Accounted for learning outcomes of schools and centers viz-a-viz goals and Manages instructional system
targets
Performed instructional supervision to Assigns teachers where they best fi
achieve learning outcomes . Inspects regularly Daily Lesson Lo

. Organizes special classes for learn
Determines the strengths, weakne
Provides EPA compliant accommo
Provided safe and child friendly learning and school environment for Evaluates the school plant, physica
students/learners
Provided technical assistance to teachers on matters pertaining to enhancement

of classroom management, skills and instructional competence and to non-teaching
personnel for support services within the RPMS cycle
6. Promotes and coordinates se
. Initiates and compiles teachers p
Rates all school personnel perform
. Promotes welfare of stakeholder
Established school and family and
community partnership for school performance

Performed school leadership, management and operations functions
s instructional system
teachers where they best fit to teach (grades, learning areas, special assignments, etc.)
s regularly Daily Lesson Logs (DLL)

zes special classes for learners with special needs
ines the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the school
s EPA compliant accommodation to learners amidst shortages
es the school plant, physical facilities fitness, safety and sufficiency with the assistance of specialists
5. Organizes and conducts INSETs
omotes and coordinates services for the holistic development of school personnel and pupils
s and compiles teachers professional documents in portfolios
school personnel performance and recommends promotion
tes welfare of stakeholders

INDIVIDUAL PERFORM
Name of Employee: ________________________
Position: Principal 1
Review Period: January 2015-December 2015
School: _______________________
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Instructional Instructional Leadership Performs instructional supervision to Jan-Dec

supervision achieve learning outcomes
to achieve
learning
outcomes
performed
classroom Conducts classroom observation

observation and monitoring
& monitoring
conducted
Performs instructional supervision

Instructional
supervision
performed
child friendly Learning Environment Establish systems for safe and child
school systems friendly learning and school environment
established for students
Physical Improved physical environment
environment for student learning
improved
Technical Human Resource Provides technical assistance to

Assistance Management and teachers on matters pertaining to
provided Development enhancement of classroom mngt,
skills and instructional competence.
INSET & LAC Conducts TNA-based in-service

conducted trainings and learning action cell.
school's Parents' Involvement Established school, family and

stakeholders and Community community partnership for performance
partnership Partnership
established
School Leadership,
Data-based Management and Performs data-based strategic planning
strategic Operations
planning
performed
Sound school Performs School Leadership,

leadership & Management and Operations
management functions
performed
school Improve school performance
performance in the areas:
improved enrolment rate
dropout rate
survival rate
promotion rate
Plus Factor Facilitates training in Division/
regional level

Ratee:
______________________________
Name of Rater:
Position: District Supervisor
Date of Review: December 2015
WEIGHT evidences ACTUAL RE

per KRA MOVs Actual Quality
40%
7.5% NAT results - from 65 to 69 2 pts 1.5 4
7.50% GSA sheet - 85 75 3

SF 5
10% class observations -180 150

monitoring 120 4
ISP - 1
2% 1 ISP 1 5
PMCF-120
13% 100 95 4
PMCF
10%
5% committees -CPP,DRRM,SPG, GAD, SPT
Policies 3 5 5
5% 5- 17 & above of classrooms & facilities are structured & well-maintained 17 15 4
1- 7 & below of classrooms & facilities are structured & well-maintained
20% 5- 17 and above of teachers provided with technical assistance
10% with corresponding evidences: (observation reports, TNA results
performance analysis & recommendations for devt interventions(semestral) 34 34 5
with corresponding evidences(semestral)
1- 6 & below of teachers provided with technical assistance
2.5% 5- 17 & above of teachers attended(2) INSET with TCR
4- 14-16 of teachers attended(2) INSET with TCR 2 2 5
3- 10-13 of teachers attended(2) INSET
2- 7 -9 of teachers attended(2) INSET
1- 6 & below of teachers attended(2) INSET
2.50% 5- 17 & above of teachers attended LAC sessions with TCR 20 15 3
1- 6 & below of teachers attended LAC sessions with TCR
w/ TCR
5% 5 -Has stakeholders partnership/mobilization plan agreements
(complete with reports and documentations of meetings,
Organized programs with stakeholders,esp. parents for academic 4 4
and other purposes (esp. Strategic planning)
Obtained resources for the school through stakeholders partnership
4 -Has mobilization plan and occasionally meets stakeholders in
meetings and activities but some elements (e.g. not enough
resources raised)
3- Has mobilization plan and ocassionally meets are missing

stakeholders but not resulting to resources generated and
evidences
2-Poor mobilization skills and seldom meets stakeholders
1-No evidence in this area
20% 5- Produced a school strategic plan/SIP and AIP through the
10% strategic planning process 1 4 4
conduct of school situational analysis, SWOT, determining
strategies through prioritizing strategic options, resource and facilities
planning and formulation of PAPs based of analyses
Strategic Plan was based on Deped vision, contextualized in
in school vision and mission all school stakeholders were
engaged in the strategic planning process
-M&E for process and outcomes checkpoints were
developed and utilized
100% and above accomplishment of school targets
(with evidence contained in school report card
-School report card presented to all stakeholders
4-Produced strategic plan following the strategic
planning process with minimal deviation and 86%-99%
accomplishment of school targets (supported by evidence
3- Produced strategic plan following the strategic
planning process with minimal deviation and
75%-85% accomplishment of school targets
(supported by evidence
2-Produced strategic plan following the strategic
planning process with deviation and
65%-74% accomplishment of school targets
(supported by evidence
1-64% and below accomplishments, strategic planning
process and evidences are largely absent
10% 5- With clear financial management system for the school
supported by evidences such as reports, account logs 4 4
, database sytem
Allocated/Prioritized funds for programs and school
facilities improvement and maintenance
Monitored, accounted and reported utilization of school fund

Reported sources and uses of funds
Ensured quality standards for facilities given to the school
Coordinated with stakeholders on resource mobilization
Maintained school EMIS and regularly submit
MIS reports to the Division Office
4- With clear financial and resource management
system but one or equirements were missing were
negligible (with complete evidence
3-With clear financial and resource management
system but two requirements and/or reports were lacking
2-Financial Management System and reporting were
in its initial stages
1-No Financial Managment System and/or reports
observed
10%
5- 100% of the target met per indicator
2.50% 4- 86-99% of the target met per indicator 4
2.50% 3- 75%-85% of the target met per indicator 0 3
2.50% 2- 65%-74% of the target met per indicator 80% 4
2.50% 1- 64% & below of the target met per indicator 95% 4%
Rater: ________________________________________
PSDS
ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
Efficiency Timeliness Ave
4 4 4 0.3
3 3 3 0.23
0.35
3 3.5 3.5
5 5 0.1
4 4 0.52
5 5 0.25
4 4 0.2
5 5 0.5
5 5 0.125
3 3 0.075
4 4 0.2
4 4 4 4 0.4
4 4 4 0.4
4 4 0.1
3 3 0.075
4 0.1
4 4 0.1
4.025
Name of Employee: ________________________ Name of Rater:
Position: Pri Teacher 1 Position: Principal I
Review Period: JuNE 2015-March 2016 Date of Review: November 2015
District:
School: _______________________
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT
per KRA
Lessons plans Teaching-Learning Process June-March 50%
& daily logs Prepares 1440 lesson plans and daily logs 10%
with IMs of activities including appropriate,
prepared adequate and updated instructional materials
from June 2016 to March 2017
Teaching- Facilitates teaching and learning in all subjects 20%

learning through functional lessons plans,
facilitated daily logs and innovative teaching strategies
at the end of school year
Student's Initiates discipline of students including 10%
discipline classroom rules, guidelines and individual
initiated and group tasks
attendance, Monitors attendance, diversity appreciation, 10%

cleanliness safe, positive and motivating environment,
& classroom overall physical atmosphere, cleanliness and
atmosphere orderliness of classrooms including
monitored proper waste disposal
Pupils/Students Outcomes 30%

Pupils progress Monitors,evaluates and maintains 8%
monitored pupils progress
& evaluated
Remedial & Conducts remediation/enrichment programs 7%
enrichment to improve performance indicators

programs
conducted
Required Attains the required GSA for grade level 15%

GSA in and learning areas
learning 75
areas
attained
Community Involvement 7%
regular/ Conducts regular/periodic PTA meetings 3%
periodic /conferences
PTA meetings
conducted 4
Parents of Visits parents of students needing academic 2%

students monitoring/follow-up
needing 2
academic
follow-up
visited
Projects Undertaken/initiated projects/events/activities 2%

events with external funding/sponsorship
activities
initiated
Professional Growth and 8%

Action Development Conducts Action Research 3%
Research
conducted
Co-curricular
school
association Initiated/Participated in co-curricular/school 5%
participated association, etc.
Special Assignments/ Facilitates training in school/district/ 5%

Tasks division 2.50%
/division/district/school 2.50%
Serves as coordinator in subjects/

special programs/ projects in the school
____________________________ ____________________________
Ratee Rater
Name of Rater:
Position: Principal I
Date of Review: November 2015
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
QUALITY
5-All daily lesson plans had the following objectives
subject matter, procedures, evaluation and assignment
Each part had a full description of what to do with an example
Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-oriented
and time-bound
100% and above developed high order thinking skills
Attains 100% and above of the desired learning competencies
4-Had four of the five parts of lesson plan
Each part had a partial description of what to do with an example
Objective was stated with 1 behavioral indicator is missing
86-99% developed high order thinking skills
Attained 86-99% of the desired learning
3- Had 3 of the five parts
Each part had a partial description without example
Objective was stated with 3-4 behavioral indicator missing
Attained 75-85% of the desired learning competencies
Each part had no description of what to do with example
Objective was stated with 1-2 behavioral indicators missing
Each part had no description of what to do and example
Objective was stated without behavioral indicators
64% and below develop high order thinking skills
64% and below attain the desired learning competencies at all
5-Established challenging and measurable goals for

student learning aligned with the curriculum guide.
5-Teaching methods and strategies elicited 100% & above
interaction from a class
5-Cooperative learning strategies was 100% & above
effective when used
5- ICT integration is100% and above evident
5-Provided appropriate activities to 100% & above of lessons taught
Teaching methods and strategies elicited 86%-99%
Cooperative learning strategies was 86%-99% effective
ICT integration was 86%-99% evident
Provided appropriate activities to 86%-99% of lessons taught
Teaching methods and strategies elicited 64% & below
Cooperative learning strategies was 64% & below effective
ICT integration was 64% & below evident
Provided appropriate activities to 64% & below of lessons taught
5-Pupils were 100% and above guided in the observation
of classroom rules and guidelines as evidenced by descriptive
rating in the report card/journal
4-Pupils were 86%-99% guided in the observation of classroom
rules and guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the
report card/journal
3-Pupils were 75-85% guided in the observation of classroom rules and
guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the reportcard/journal
2-Pupils were 65%-74% guided in the observation of classroom rules and
guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal
1-Pupils were 64% & below guided in the observation of classroom rules and
5-Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper

waste disposal were 100% and above maintained
Attendance checking was 100% and above systematically carried out

waste disposal were 86%-99% maintained
Attendance checking was 86%-99% systematically carried out

waste disposal were 64% and below
Attendance checking was 64%and below systematically
carried out
5-Evidences showed that the teacher purposely plans assessments
and varies assessment choices to match the different student needs,
abilities and learning styles
Class record reflected the bases of 100% and above of pupils ratings in all classes/subject
areas handled
Students portfolio contained 100% and above of his accomplishment
Table of Specifications is 100% and above prepared for tests
showing congruence between content and skills tested
Test questions were100% and above logically sequenced
Pretest and Post-test were 100% and above administered
in all classes/subject area
4-Evidences showed that the teacher purposely plans
assessments and varies assessment choices to match the
different student needs, abilities, and learning styles.
Class record reflected the bases of 86%-99% of pupils ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled
Students portfolio contained 86%-99% of his accomplishment
Table of Specifications is 86%-99% prepared for tests
Test questions were 86%-99% logically sequenced
Pretest and Post-test were 86%-99% administered
handled
Test questions were75%-85% logically sequenced

handled
Class record reflected the bases of 64% below of pupils ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled
Students portfolio contained 64% below of his accomplishment
Table of Specifications is 64% below prepared for tests
Test questions were 64% below logically sequenced
Pretest and Post-test were 64% below administered
5-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 100% and above of students who need it and
4-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 86%-99% of students who need it and
1-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 64% below of students who need it and
100% and above MPS/GSA

86%-99% MPS/GSA
75%-85% MPS/GSA
65-74% MPS/GSA
64% and below MPS/GSA
100% and above accomplishment with set agreements met

86%-99% of planned meetings conducted producing only set
agreements and partial accomplishment of these
75-85% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements
65-74% of planned meetings conducted with minimal results
64% and below of planned meetings conducted with no results
100% and above accomplishment of set visits successful
interventions
86%-99% accomplishment of visits with partial success in
implementation of interventions
75%-85% accomplishment of visits with suggested
planned interventions
61%-74% accomplishment of visits with planned
60%-below accomplishment of set visits with planned
interventions
100% and above project accomplishment with full

documentation report on completion
86%-99% project accomplishment with partial completion
75%-85% project initiative only with no completion report
No project/event/activity initiated
5- 3 Action Research conducted with full documentation on completion of interventions

4- 2 Action Research conducted with documentation on
completion of interventions
2-Identified classroom/learning problems with research proposals
1- Only classroom/ learning problems/ issues identified
5- Initiated at least 2 co-curricular/ school activities with documented results

4-initiated and participated in co-curricular/school activities
with documented results

3-participated in most of co-curricular/ school activities with
documented results
2-Participation only without documented results
1-No participation in school activities
5- facilitated 1 training at division & 2 districts
4-facilitated 1 training in district/4 in school
3-facilitated 3 trainings in school
5- acted as chair of working committee in the division w/ reports
4- acted as chair of working committee in the district w/ reports
3- acted as chair of 2 working committee in the district w/ reports
2- acted as chair of 3 working committees in the school w/ reports
1- acted as chair of 2 working committee in the school w/ AR
5- 100% of activities in assigned programs/projects implemented w/ MOVs
4- 86%-99% of activities in assigned programs/projects implemented w/ MOVs
1- 64% & below of activities in assigned programs/projects implemented w/ MOVs
Approving Authority
CE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
5- 100% & above of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs 5-100% and above LPs & DLLs are based on the budget of work
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials 100% and above of LPs & DLLs is prepared daily
4- 86%-99% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs 4-86%-99% of LPs & DLLs based on the budget of work
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials 86%-99% of LPs & DLLs is prepared daily
3- 75%-85% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs 3-75%-85% of LPs & DLLs based on the budget of work
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials 75%-85% of LPs & DLLs are updated
2- 65%-74% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs 2- 65%-74% of LsP & DLLs are based on the budget of work
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials 65%-74% of LPs & DLLs are updated
1- 64% & below of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs 1-64% & below of LPs & DLLs are based on the budget of work
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials 64% & below of LPs & DLLs are updated
5- 100% & above of instructional materials were used appropriately 5-100% of the lessons delivered on time
Managed time and resources efficiently in 100% & above of lessons taught 100% of the activities were done on time
4- 86%-99% of instructional materials were used appropriately 4-86%-99% of the lessons delivered on time
Managed time and resources efficiently in of 86%-99% lessons taught 86%-99% of the activities were done on time
3- 75%-85% of instructional materials were used appropriately 3-75%-85% of the lessons delivered on time
Managed time and resources efficiently in 75%-85% of lessons taught 75%-85% of the activities were done on time
2-65%-74% of instructional materials were used appropriately 2- 65%-74% of the lessons delivered on time
Managed time and resources efficiently in 75%-85% of lessons taught 65%-74%of the activities were done on time
1- 64% & below of instructional materials were used appropriately 1-64% & below of the lessons delivered on time
Managed time and resources efficiently in 64% & below of lessons taught 64%of the activities were done on time
5- 3 action research conducted based target date
4-2 action research conducted based target date
2-Identified classroom/learning problems with research
proposals on target date
1- Only classroom/ learning problems/ issues identified on
target date
5-100% of activities implemented on time
4-86%-99% of activities implemented 5-10 days late
1-64% of activities implemented 21-30 days late
Target ACTUAL RESULT RATING SCORE
Q E T Average
5
5
1
35 4 4 0.4
10-chart 5 5 5
10-SF2 5 5 5
4-systems 4 4 4 4.67 0.467 seat plan
leader
checklist
group
CR-10 5 5 5
32 5 5
32 4 4 4
100% 5 5 5
5 5 5 4.8 0.38
1 RP 5 5 5 5 5 0.35
R-5 5 5 5
M-5 5 5 5
MPS-85
GSA-85 3 3 3 0.45
4 5 5 5 0.15
5 5 5 5 0.1
2 5 5 0.1
1 1 0.03
5 5 5 5 5 0.25
1
1 1 0.025
1 1 0.025
2.727
Overall Rating
Descriptive Rating
District:
School: _______________________
per KRA
from June 2016 to March 2017
Teaching- Facilitates teaching and learning in all subjects 20%

learning through functional lessons plans,
facilitated daily logs and innovative teaching strategies
at the end of school year


& evaluated
programs
conducted
Required Attains the required GSA for grade level 15%

GSA in and learning areas
learning 75
areas
attained
PTA meetings
conducted 4

needing 2
academic
follow-up
visited

activities
initiated
Action Development Conducted Action Research 3%

Research
conducted
Co-curricular
school
Facilitates training in Division/ 5%

regional level 2.50%
region/division/district 2.50%
School Leadership, Mngt Prepares & submits SIP/AIP to improve

Operation performance.
Implements programs, projects &

activities in SIP/AIP
Manages school funds & resources

wisely and equitably at the end of SY.
____________________________ ____________________________
Name of Rater:
QUALITY
and time-bound

Teaching methods and strategies elicited 100% & above
Cooperative learning strategies was 100% & above
effective when used
ICT integration is100% and above evident
Provided appropriate activities to 100% & above of lessons taught
report card/journal



carried out
Class record reflected the bases of 100% and above of pupils ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled
Class record reflected the bases of 86%-99% of pupils ratings in all

Class record reflected the bases of 64% below of pupils ratings in all
5-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 100% and above of students

who need it and
4-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 86%-99% of students who
need it and
need it and
need it and
1-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 64% below of students who
need it and

86%-99% MPS/GSA
75%-85% MPS/GSA
65-74% MPS/GSA
100% and above accomplishment with set agreements met
interventions
interventions

5- 3 Action Research conducted with full documentation on completion of

interventions


documented results
1-facilitated 0 trainings in region/1 in district
1- acted as chair of 1 working committee in the school
5-100% & above of plans,programs & projects ti improve pupils performance
captured in SIP/AIP using CI process witn complete evidences
5-100% & above of plans,programs & projects ti improve pupils performance
implemented
4-86%-99% of plans,programs & projects to improve pupils performance
implemented
implemented
implemented
implemented
5-100% & above of school funds & resources managed wisely & equitably
4-86-99% of school funds & resources managed wisely & equitably
3-75%-85% of school funds & resources managed wisely & equitably
L PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
EFFICIENCY
5- 100% & above of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
w/ appropriate & low-cost instructional materials
4- 86%-99% of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
1- 64% & below of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
5- 100% & above of instructional materials were used appropriately

Managed time and resources efficiently in 100% & above of lessons taught
4- 86%-99% of instructional materials were used appropriately
Managed time and resources efficiently in of 86%-99% lessons taught
Managed time and resources efficiently in 75%-85% of lessons taught
2-65%-74% of instructional materials were used appropriately
1- 64% & below of instructional materials were used appropriately
Managed time and resources efficiently in 64% & below of lessons taught
5-established 5 systems in using funds(,procurement,
disbursement, monitoring,implementation,liquidation)
4- 4 systems established
1- 1 system established
Approving Authority
Target ACTUAL RESULT
TIMELINESS Q E T Average
5-100% and above LPs & DLLs are based on the budget of work
100% and above of LPs & DLLs is prepared daily
4-86%-99% of LPs & DLLs based on the budget of work 4 4 5 4.25
86%-99% of LPs & DLLs is prepared daily
3-75%-85% of LPs & DLLs based on the budget of work
75%-85% of LPs & DLLs are updated
2- 65%-74% of LsP & DLLs are based on the budget of work
1-64% & below of LPs & DLLs are based on the budget of work
64% & below of LPs & DLLs are updated
5-100% of the lessons delivered on time

100% of the activities were done on time
4-86%-99% of the lessons delivered on time
86%-99% of the activities were done on time
2- 65%-74% of the lessons delivered on time
65%-74%of the activities were done on time
1-64% & below of the lessons delivered on time
64%of the activities were done on time
35 4
10-chart 5 5 5
10-SF2 5 5 5
4-systems 4 4 4
CR-10 5 5 5
32 5 5
32 4 4 4
100% 5 5 5
5 5 5
1 RP
5 5 5 5
R-5
5 5 5
M-5
5 5 5
MPS-85
GSA-85 3 3
4 5 5
5 5 5
2 5
1 1
5 5 5 5
1
1 1
1 1
5-SIP/AIP prepared and submitted on time
4-SIP/AIP prepared and submitted 10-30 days after the schedule
3-SIP/AIP prepared and submitted 2-3 mnths after the schedule
2-SIP/AIP prepared and submitted 4-5 mnths after the schedule
1-SIP/AIP prepared and submitted 6 mnths after the schedule
5-100% of the programs,projects & activities implemented on scheduled time

4-86-99% of the programs,projects & activities implemented on scheduled time
3-75-85% of the programs,projects & activities implemented on scheduled time
2-65%-74% of the programs,projects & activities implemented on scheduled time
1-64% & above of the programs,projects & activities implemented on scheduled time
5- 100% & above of school funds disbursed & liquidated on time

4- 86%-99% of school funds disbursed & liquidated 1-3 days late
3- 75%-85% of school funds disbursed & liquidated 4-6 days
2- 65%-74% of school funds disbursed & liquidated 1-2weeks late
1- 64% & below of school funds disbursed & liquidated 3 wks late
RATING SCORE
4 0.4
4 0.4
4.67 0.467
4.8 0.38
5 0.35
3 0.45
5 0.15
5 0.1
5 0.1
0.03
5 0.25
0.025
0.025
3.127
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE C
District:
School: _______________________
per KRA
Teaching-Learning Process June-March 50%
Prepares 1440 lesson plans and daily logs 10%
of activities including appropriate,
adequate and updated instructional materials
Facilitates learning in the elementary 20%

schools through functional lessons plans,
daily logs and innovative teaching strategies
and learning materials
Initiates discipline of students including 10%

classroom rules, guidelines and individual
Monitors attendance, diversity appreciation, 10%

safe, positive and motivating environment,
overall physical atmosphere, cleanliness and
Monitors,evaluates and maintains 8%
pupils progress
Conducts remediation/enrichment programs 7%

to improve performance indicators
Attained the required GSA for grade level 15%

and learning areas
75
Conducts regular/periodic PTA meetings 3%
/conferences
Visits parents of students needing academic 2%

monitoring/follow-up
2
Undertaken/initiated projects/events/activities 2%
with external funding/sponsorship

Development Conducted Action Research 3%
Initiated/Participated in co-curricular/school 5%
association, etc.
Plus Factor Facilitates training in Division/ 5%

regional level
Acted as Teacher-Incharge/School head
____________________________ ____________________________
Ratee Rater
Name of Rater:
Evidences Target Actual ACTUAL RESULT

Q E
SMART Lesson plans/daily logs 1440
100% HOTS
100% competencies attained 1280
100% of budget of work accomplished
MPS - 85
Teaching methods & strategies elicited 100% interaction 85
Inductive & deductive methods 100% used
Cooperative learning used
ICT integration 100% evident
Pupils observed classroom rules and guidelines - 100%
safe, clean & orderly floors & toilets

waste disposal maintained 10
attendance check systematically 4
Class record reflected pupils ratings CR-8

Students portfolio -100% 100
Table of Specifications is 100% and above prepared for tests 32
Test questions were100% and above logically sequenced 100%
Pretest and Post-test were 100% administered
5-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 100% 1 RP

R-10
M-5

86%-99% MPS/GSA MPS-85
75%-85% MPS/GSA GSA-85
65-74% MPS/GSA
100% and above accomplishment with set agreements met 4
100% of pupils needing academic follow-up visited 5
100% and above project accomplishment with full 5


5- Initiated at least 2 co-curricular/ school activities with documented results 5


documented results
5- acted as school head for the whole year and above
4- acted as school head for 8-10 months
Overall Rating
Approving Authority Descriptive Rating
ACTUAL RESULT RATING SCORE
T Average
Overall Rating
Descriptive Rating
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FO
Name of Employee :
Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Review Period: JUNE 2016 - MARCH 2017
District:
School: _______________________
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMAN
per KRA QUALITY

June-March 25%
5- Conducted Action Research within the district supported by the
Professional Growth Conducts at least an action research related to school following evidences: Research proposal approved by the Division
and Development or classroom concerns/ problems during the year ( complete format ), Research Report with findings and
recommendations, proposed Learning Interventions and Programs
5%
Action Research
conducted following evidences: Research proposal approved by the Division
( complete format ), Research Report with findings

following evidences: Research proposal approved by the Division
( complete format ), with no findings
2- Approved Action Research Proposal

2- Approved Action Research Proposal
1-No Action research conducted
Seminars, Attends seminars , trainings , workshops

Trainings , and other work-related activities ( school ,
Workshops district , division , region , national level ) 5% 5 - 5 or more seminars , trainings , workshops in any level attended
Attended within the school year June
to 4 - 4 seminars , trainings , workshops in any level attended
March 3 - 3 seminars , trainings , workshops in any level attended

2 - 2 seminars , trainings , workshops in any level attended
1 - 1 seminar , workshop , training in any level attended
Conducts/ facilitates seminars, workshops,

Seminars, June 10% 5- 4 seminars/workshops/trainings/ LAC conducted / facilitated
trainings within a year (school-based,
Workshops & supported by evidence / TCR
district, division, regional or national level) to
Trainings March
Conducted/
Facilitated 4- 3 seminars/workshops/trainings / LAC conducted/ facilitated
supported by evidence / TCR
3- 2 seminars/workshops/trainings / LAC conducted/ facilitated

supported by TCR
2- 1 seminars/workshops/trainings / LAC conducted /facilitated

supported by evidence/TCR
1- 1 seminar/workshop/training / LAC conducted / facilitated

withoutout evidence / TCR
Demonstration 5%
teachings served 5 - 3 demonstration teachings conducted with MOVs
Conducts demonstration teaching during June
the year to March
4- 2 demonstration teachings conducted with MOVs
3-1 demonstration teachings served with MOVs
2 - 1 demonstration teaching served without MOVs
1- Failed to serve any demonstration teaching
45%
Prepares LPs/ DLL using appropriate
Instructional strategies, methodologies and instructional
LPs & DLLs 5- 100 % LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, approches and
Prepared Competence materials within the year
June to Instructional materials prepared
March 15%
4 - 80-99%% LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, approches
and Instructional materials parts
3- 60-79% LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, approches and
Instructional materials prepared
1- 39 % or less of LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies,

approches and Instructional materials prepared
Students' Achieves at least 75% of the pupils/

Performance students performance by conducting
Achieved enrichment , reinforcement and remedial 5 - 3 points increased from the baseline
classes within the year
10%
4- 2. 5 points increased from the baseline
3- 2. 0 points increased from the baseline
2- 1.5 point increased from the baseline
1- 1 point increased from the baseline

Initiates /implements/assists in projects,
10% 5- 5 programs/projects/interventions/school publication initiated /
programs & interventions that will assisted/implemented with MOVs

Projects, Programs
& Interventions enhance the curriculum and its delivery 4-4 programs/projects/interventions/school publication initiated /
Initiated,
Implemented & assisted/implemented with MOVs
Assisted within the school year
3-3 programs/projects/interventions/school publication initiated /
assisted/implemented with MOVs
2-2 programs/projects/interventions/school publication initiated /

1-1 program/project/intervention/school publication initiated /
NAT/ ELLNA Increases NAT and ELLNA performance 5% 5- 3 points and above increased or more NAT/ ELLNA result
Performance 4 - 2 points increased in NAT/ ELLNA result
Increased 3 - 1.5 increased in NAT / ELLNA result

2- 1 point increased in NAT/ ELLNA result
1- 0. 5 point or below increased in NAT/ELLNA result
5 - observed proper decorum ( wearing of uniform . punctuality ,

Observes proper decorum at all times 5% attendance , courtesy , human relation )
4 - 4 out of 5 observed
Instructional 15%
Supervision
Conducts instructional and class monitoring

5%
of teachers within the school year 5 - Conducted instructional and class monitoring of 100% of teachers
Instructional &
Class Monitoring with appropriate monitoring tool/ STAR observation form
Assisted
4 - Conducted instructional and class monitoring of 80%- 99% of
teachers with appropriate monitoring tool/ STAR observation form
3 - Conducted the instructional and class monitoring of 60%-79%% of

teachers with appropriate monitoring tool/ STAR observation form
2 - Conducted instructional and class monitoring of 40%-59%% of

teachers with appropriate monitoring tool / STAR observation form
1 - Conducted instructional and class monitoring of 39% of teachers

and below
Conducts mentoring/ coaching activities with co-
Mentoring/ teachers within the year
Coaching Activities 5% 5- 4 and above teacher mentoring /coaching sessions were
Conducted conducted ( with report)
4 - 3 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted

(with report)
3- 2 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted

(with report)
2- 1 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted

(with report)
1- no teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted
(with report)
Manages performance of teachers following

Performance of the RPMS cycle 5% 5- 100% and above of teachers' performance evaluated following
Teachers Managed (planning and commitments, RPMS framework cycle
coaching and monitoring, review and 4- 80%-99% of teachers' performance evaluated following
evaluation and development planning) RPMS framework cycle
within the year 3- 60%-79% of teacher's performance evaluated following
RPMS framework cycle
2- 40%-59% of teacher's performance evaluated following
1-39%-below of teacher's performance evaluated following
10%
School / Community/
Parent Involvement Updates parents on childrens progress and
Partnership problems through dialogues, conferences 5%
and PTA meetings 5-100% of parents updated on pupils'/students' progress and problems
Parents Updated through quarterly release of cards , PTA meetings , home visitations.
4- 80%- 99% of parents updated on pupils'/students' progress and

problems through quarterly release of cards , PTA meetings , home
visitations.
3- 60%- 79% of parents updated on pupils'/students' progress and

visitations.
2-40%- 59% of parents updated on pupils'/students' progress and

visitations.
1-39% or below of parents updated on pupils/students' progress and

visitations.
Participates in community and civic-

Community & Civic 5%
Activities organization activities within the school year
Participated 5-100% of community and civic organization activities participated
4-80-99% of community and civic organization activities participated
3- 60-79% of community and civic organization activities participated
2-40% - 59% of community and civic organization activities participated
1-39% or less of community and civic organization activities participated

5%
Designing Capacity 5 - acted as trainer , writer , chairperson , resource person, coordinator
Development Acts as trainer/ chairperson of a in 5 activities/ committees in school or 3 in the district, or 1 in the
Programs Assisted committee / writer / resource person / division or higher level
Technical Assistance coordinator in the school , district , division ,
region , national level. 5%
4 - acted as trainer, writer , chairperson , resource person , coordinator
in 4 activities/ committees in the school or 2 in the district
3 - acted as trainer, writer , chairperson , resource person ,

coordinator in 3 activities/ committees in school or 1 in the district
2 - acted as trainer, writer , chairperson , resource person , coordinator in 2

activities/ committees in school
1 - acted as trainer, writer , chairperson , resource person , coordinator in 1

activity/ committee in school
Ratee Rater
COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
Name of Rater :
Position :
Date of Review : MARCH 2017
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE
5 - Action Research conducted with expenses less 5 - Action research conducted 5 days before the
than the approved budget schedule
4 - Action research conducted on schedule

4 - Action Research conducted with expenses within
the budget
3 - Action research conducted 1- 5 days after the

schedule
3 - Action Research conducted with expenses 5%
over the budget

2 - Action Research conducted with expenses 10% schedule
over the budget
2 - Action Research conducted with expenses 10% schedule
over the budget
1- No action research done

1 - Action research conducted with expenses more
than 10% over the budget
5 - Conducted seminars / trainings / workshops / LAC within the

specified time in the training design
5- Conducted seminars/ trainings / workshops / LAC utilizing low-
cost , indigenous materials with less than the budget alloted.
4 - Conducted seminars / trainings / workshops / LAC 1 - 2 days

4 - Conducted seminars/ trainings / workshops / LAC utilizing beyond the specified time in the training design
low-cost , indigenous materials and within the budget alloted.
3 - Conducted seminars / trainings / workshops / LAC 3-5 days

low-cost , indigenous materials with 5% more than the budget
alloted.
2 - Conducted seminars / trainings / workshops / LAC 6-8 days

low-cost , indigenous materials with 10 % more than the budget
alloted.
1 - Conducted seminars / trainings / workshops / LAC 9-12 days or

1 - Conducted seminars/ trainings / workshops / LAC utilizing more beyond the specified time in the training design
alloted.
1 - Conducted seminars / trainings / workshops / LAC 9-12 days or
1 - Conducted seminars/ trainings / workshops / LAC utilizing more beyond the specified time in the training design
alloted.
5 - demonstration teaching conducted based on alloted
5-100% of demonstration teachings done with appropriate
time
instructional materials / ICT equipment
4-80-99% of demonstration teachings done with appropriate 4 - demonstration teaching conducted 1- 5 minutes after
Instructional materials / ICT equipment the alloted time
3-60-79% of demonstration teachings done with appropriate 3 - demonstration teaching conducted 6- 10 minutes
Instructional materials/ ICT equipment after the alloted time
2-40-59% of demonstration teachings done with apropriate 2 - demonstration teaching conducted 11-15 minutes
Intructional materials/ ICT equipment after the alloted time
1-39% and below of demonstration teachings done with 1 - demonstration teaching conducted 15 minutes
inappropriate Intructional materials / ICT equipment beyond alloted time
5-100% & above teaching-process facilitated using appropriate

5- 100% LP/ DLL with IMs are prepared a day before
localized materials / ICT equipment
4- 80%-99% of teaching-process facilitated using 4 - 100% of LP/DLL with IMs prepared during the day
appropriate localized instructional materials/ ICT equipment
3- 60% - 79% of teaching-process facilitated using 3- 100% LP/ DLL prepared a day late
2-40%-59% of teaching-process facilitated using 2- 100% LP/DLL prepared 2 days late

1- 39% & below teaching-process facilitated using 1- 100% LP/DLL prepared 3 days late
appropriate localized instructional materials / ICT equipment
5- Conducted enrichment , reinforcement,

5- Conducted enrichment , reinforcement , remedial
remediation utilizing 100% low-cost materials/ SIMs
session ahead of the scheduled time
appropriate for the pupils' learning level
4 - Conducted enrichment , reinforcement,

4- Conducted enrichment , reinforcement , remedial
remediation utilizing 80- 99% low-cost materials/ SIMs
sessions on time the scheduled time

3 - Conducted enrichment , reinforcement , remedial
remediation utilizing 60-79% low-cost materials/ SIMs
sessions conducted 1 - 2 days after
2 - Conducted enrichment , reinforcement,

remediation utilizing 40-59% low-cost materials/ SIMs
sessions 3-4 days after

remediation utilizing 39% or less low-cost materials/
sessions 5 days after or more
SIMs appropriate for the pupils' learning level
5 - 5 of programs / projects/ publication / intervention
implemented within the specified time
4 - 4 programs / projects/ publication / intervention

exceeded 1-5 days within the specified time
3 - 3 programs / projects/ publication / intervention

exceeded 6-10 days
2- Initiated/ implemented/ assisted in projects/

programs/ intervention with more than 10% of the
alloted budget
1- Initiated/ implemented/ assisted in projects/

programs/ intervention with 15% or more of the
alloted budget
5 - Reports submitted ahead of time
4 - Reports Submitted on time
3 - Reports submitted 1-2 days after
2 - Reports submitted 3-4 days after
1 - Reports submitted 5 days or more after

5- 4 and above mentoring/coaching sessions done using
appropriate Ims/ICT equipment following scheduled time 5 - mentoring reports submitted ahead of time
4-3 mentoring/coaching sessions done using appropriate Ims/ICT 4 -mentoring reports submitted on time
equipment following scheduled time
3-2 mentoring/coaching sessions done using appropriate Ims/ICT

equipment following scheduled time 3 - mentoring reports submitted 1 - 2 days after
2-1 mentoring/coaching sessions done using appropriate Ims/ICT

equipment following scheduled time 2- mentoring reports submitted 3-4 days after
1- No mentoring/coaching sessions done using appropriate 1 - Mentoring reports submitted 5 days or more after
Ims/ICT equipment following scheduled time
5 - Managed performance of teachers 1- 2 days before

the specified time frame
4- Managed performance of teachers during the
specified time
3- Managed performance of teachers 1-2 days after the
specified time
2 - Managed performance of teachers 3 - 4 days after
the specified time
1 - Managed performance of teachers 5 days or more
after the specified time
5 - Quarterly release of Cards/ PTA meetings conducted
on the scheduled date
4 - Quarterly release of cards/ PTA meetings conducted

1 week after the scheduled date
3 - Release of Cards/ PTA meetings conducted 2

weeks after the scheduled date
2 - Release of Cards/ PTA meetings conducted one

month after the scheduled date
1- Release of Cards/ PTA meetings conducted more

than one month after the scheduled date
5-100% of community & civic activities participated on time
4-80-99% of community & civic activities participated on time
1-39% and below of community & civic activities participated

on time
5-Assistance given upon receipt of instruction from school
head
4-Assistance given 1 day after receipt of instruction
3-Assistance given 2-3 days after receipt of instruction

2-Assistance given 4-5days after receipt of instruction
1-Assistance given 8-10 days after receipt of instruction
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
FELIX ROMY A. TRIAMBULO , CESE

Approving Authority
Key Result Areas(KRAs)
Professional Growth
& Devt
Instructional Competence
Instructional Supervision
School/community/Partnership
Technical Assistance
Objectives
Conducted at least an action research related to school
or classroomconcerns/ problems during the year
Participated in seminars, workshops, trainings
within a year (division, regional or national)
Received (division, regional or national)
awards/recognitions within a year
Served as demonstration teacher
Handled teaching loads every year

Achieved at least 75% of the students performance at the end of the school
Attained 100% of the required learning competencies

for the students in every quarter
Increased NAT performance by 10%
Observed 100% of the teachers every quarter

Conducted at least 3 mentoring/ coaching activities with teachers quarterly
Evaluated teachers performance twice a year.
Job objectives
1.Attends professional meetings, in-service trainings and related activities for self-growth and advancement.
8. Observes proper decorum
9. Conducts echo seminars for co-teachers.
Conducts in-depth studies or action researches on instructional problems
22. Assists in designing capacity development programs for teachers
23. Serves as trainer in school-based INSET
serves as demonstration teachers
2. Prepares daily logs and visual aids related to the lesson .

3. Conducts remedial episodes classes for slow learners
14. Leads in the preparation and enrichment of curriculum; leads in the discussion of professional
ideas, problems, issues and concerns
15. Initiates projects and programs that will enhance the curriculum and its delivery
16. Makes the needed instructional materials available to teachers and students
24. Evaluates teacher-made tests and interpret results
26. Carries regular teaching load for the grade/subject area
12. Assists principals in instructional monitoring of teachers.

13. Guides co-teachers in the performance of duties and responsibilities
Mentors co-teachers in content and skills difficulties
Assists school heads in class monitoring
Checks regularly lesson plans of teachers in the assigned grade/subject area
Outputs
Action research
Seminars/workshops/trainings
Awards/recognitions for the year
Documented demonstration teaching

Teaching load
75% annual student performance
Quarterly observation forms for teachers accomplished

3 documented mentoring/coaching activities per quarter
c. Accomplished teachers evaluation report
Position: Teacher 1 Position: Principal I
District:
School: _______________________
per KRA
for every semester
Teaching- Facilitates teaching and learning in assigned subject 20%

learning area through functional lessons plans,
facilitated daily logs, innovative teaching strategies
and Instructional materials for every semester

Students Outcomes 30%

& evaluated

programs
conducted
Required Attains the required GSA for subjects taught 15%

GSA in for every semester
learning 75
areas
attained
PTA meetings
conducted 4

needing 2
academic
follow-up vbjunbats@yahoo.com
visited

activities
initiated

Action Development Conducts Action Research 3%
Research
conducted
Co-curricular
school
Special Assignments/ Facilitates training in school/district/ 5%

Tasks division 2.50%
/division/district/school 2.50%
Serves as coordinator in subjects/

special programs/ projects in the school
____________________________ ____________________________
Ratee Rater
Name of Rater:
QUALITY
and time-bound

5-Teaching methods and strategies elicited 100% & above
5-Cooperative learning strategies was 100% & above
effective when used
5- ICT integration is100% and above evident
5-Provided appropriate activities to 100% & above of lessons taught
report card/journal



carried out
Class record reflected the bases of 100% and above of pupils ratings in all classes/subject
areas handled
handled
handled

handled
Class record reflected the bases of 64% below of pupils ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled
5-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 100% and above of students who need it and

1-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 64% below of students who need it and
100% and above of subjects taught attained 90%-100% GSA.

86%-99% of subjects taught attained 75%-89% GSA
64% and below of subjects taught attained 75%-89% GSA
5- 4 and above PTA meetings conducted with agreements and MOVs

4- 3 PTA meetings conducted w/ agrrements and MOVs
1- 1 PTA meeting conducted w/o agreements and MOVs

interventions
interventions




documented results
5- facilitated 1 training at division & 2 districts
4-facilitated 1 training in district/4 in school
5- acted as chair of working committee in the division w/ reports
4- acted as chair of working committee in the district w/ reports
3- acted as chair of 2 working committee in the district w/ reports
2- acted as chair of 3 working committees in the school w/ reports
1- acted as chair of 2 working committee in the school w/ AR
5- 100% of activities in assigned programs/projects implemented w/ MOVs
1- 64% & below of activities in assigned programs/projects implemented w/ MOVs
Approving Authority
ANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM
EFFICIENCY
5- 100% & above of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
1- 64% & below of Lesson Plans & Daily Lesson Logs
5- 100% & above of instructional materials were used appropriately

Managed time and resources efficiently in 100% & above of lessons taught
Managed time and resources efficiently in of 86%-99% lessons taught
2-65%-74% of instructional materials were used appropriately
1- 64% & below of instructional materials were used appropriately
Managed time and resources efficiently in 64% & below of lessons taught
5- 5 systems in checking students attendance established(by group,checklist,
seat plan, calling out names, & others)

4- 4 out of 5 systems in checking students' attendance established
Target ACTUAL RESULT RATING
TIMELINESS Q E T Average
5-100% and above LPs & DLLs are based on the budget of work
100% and above of LPs & DLLs is prepared daily
86%-99% of LPs & DLLs is prepared daily
2- 65%-74% of LsP & DLLs are based on the budget of work
1-64% & below of LPs & DLLs are based on the budget of work
64% & below of LPs & DLLs are updated
5-100% of the lessons delivered on time 5

100% of the activities were done on time 5
4-86%-99% of the lessons delivered on time 1
2- 65%-74% of the lessons delivered on time
65%-74%of the activities were done on time
1-64% & below of the lessons delivered on time
64%of the activities were done on time
35 4 4
10-chart 5 5 5
5-100% & above of student's attendance & classroom cleanliness checked daily 10-SF2 5 5 5
4-86%-99% of student's attendance & classroom cleanliness checked daily 4-systems 4 4 4 4.67
3-75%-85% of student's attendance & classroom cleanliness checked daily
2-65%-74% of student's attendance & classroom cleanliness checked daily
1-64% & below of student's attendance & classroom cleanliness checked daily
CR-10 5 5 5
32 5 5
32 4 4 4
100% 5 5 5
5 5 5 4.8
1 RP
5 5 5 5 5
R-5 5 5 5
M-5 5 5 5
5-100% & above of GSA in subjects taught submitted 2 days after QA.
4-86%-99% of GSA in subjects taught submitted 3-5 days after QA.
3-75%-85% of GSA in subjects taught submitted 6-10 days after QA. MPS-85
2-65-74% of GSA in subjects taught submitted 11-15 days after QA. GSA-85 3 3 3
1-64% & below of GSA in subjects taught submitted 16-20 days after QA.
4 5 5 5
5 5 5 5
2 5 5
5- 3 action research conducted based target date

4-2 action research conducted based target date 1 1
2-Identified classroom/learning problems with research proposals on
target date
1- Only classroom/ learning problems/ issues identified on target date
5 5 5 5 5
1
1 1
1 1
5-100% of activities implemented on time
1-64% of activities implemented 21-30 days late
Overall Rating
Descriptive Rating
SCORE
0.4
0.467
0.38
0.35
0.45
0.15
0.1
0.1
0.03
0.25
0.025
0.025
2.727

Ipcrf-Master Teachers

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ipcrf-Master Teachers

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Name of Employee: ________________________

Instructional Instructional Leadership Performs instructional supervision to all Jan-Dec

classroom Conducts and submits 100 classroom observation

Performs instructional supervision to enhance

Physical Improved physical environment

Technical Human Resource Provides technical assistance to

INSET & LAC Conducts TNA-based in-service

school Improve school performance

Acted chair of a committee in the

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

10.00% 5- 100% & above of teachers have 90%-100% GSA

10% 5- 100% & above classroom observation following STAR

10% 5- 100% and above accomplishments on the following

3- All mechanisms are present but w/o evidences

3- Has mobilization plan and ocassionally meets are missing

performance captured in SIP/AIP using CI process with 90% evidences

3-75%-85% of plans,programs & projects based on data to improve schools

captured in SIP/AIP using CI process with 60% evidences

Monitored, accounted and reported utilization of school fund

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

Human Resource Management and

Parents Involvement and

Performed instructional supervision to Assigns teachers where they best fi

achieve learning outcomes . Inspects regularly Daily Lesson Lo

Provided technical assistance to teachers on matters pertaining to enhancement

6. Promotes and coordinates se

. Initiates and compiles teachers p

Rates all school personnel perform

. Promotes welfare of stakeholder

Established school and family and

community partnership for school performance

s regularly Daily Lesson Logs (DLL)

5. Organizes and conducts INSETs

s and compiles teachers professional documents in portfolios

school personnel performance and recommends promotion

tes welfare of stakeholders

Instructional Instructional Leadership Performs instructional supervision to Jan-Dec

classroom Conducts classroom observation

Performs instructional supervision

Technical Human Resource Provides technical assistance to

INSET & LAC Conducts TNA-based in-service

school's Parents' Involvement Established school, family and

Sound school Performs School Leadership,

Acted chair of a committee in the

WEIGHT evidences ACTUAL RE

7.50% GSA sheet - 85 75 3

10% class observations -180 150

3- Has mobilization plan and ocassionally meets are missing

Monitored, accounted and reported utilization of school fund

Teaching- Facilitates teaching and learning in all subjects 20%

attendance, Monitors attendance, diversity appreciation, 10%

Pupils/Students Outcomes 30%

enrichment to improve performance indicators

Required Attains the required GSA for grade level 15%

Parents of Visits parents of students needing academic 2%

Projects Undertaken/initiated projects/events/activities 2%

Professional Growth and 8%

Special Assignments/ Facilitates training in school/district/ 5%

Serves as coordinator in subjects/

5-Established challenging and measurable goals for

5-Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper

Attendance checking was 100% and above systematically carried out

Attendance checking was 65%-74% systematically carried out