Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Victor Brancati
Rosemarie Michaels
For the second lesson study of the semester our class went to see a second grade class at a
private school in San Rafael. I was really looking forward to this lesson study because I had not
had the opportunity to see second grade as a student at Dominican until now. The class had 20
students all of which were meeting the standards for that grade level and none had any kind of
disability on file. The lesson we observed the teacher teaching was Number stories and nutrition
with learning outcomes of having the students both write and answer their own number word
problem with a topic of nutrition in it. While observing the lesson, the three main focuses were
TPE: pedagogy for teaching math, math practice standard 1: make sense of problems and
persevere in solving them, and math practice standard 2: reason abstractly and quantitatively.
First, TPE: pedagogy for teaching math was demonstrated throughout the lesson. At the
start of the lesson the students went over a pattern warm up problem from the morning. Since
they had already made a prediction, they talked with partners about what they thought would be
next and why. By doing this the were able to learn and practice explaining their reasoning and
proof. Another part of the teachers techniques that I really admired seeing and plan to use in my
class is how she called the students to different parts of the class. When going from the tables to
the carpet or vice versa the teacher said things like if you have an even number of letters in your
name go sit down or odd number of vowels. By relating the math directly to them the students
were in some ways learning productive disposition. Concluding, procedural fluency could be
Brancati 2
observed through the teacher singing math songs with the students. The songs had different tunes
of nursery rhymes, but went through math multiples. The teacher did effectively demonstrate that
Second, the first math practice standard: make sense of problems and persevere in solving
them was also demonstrated during the pattern activity. At the start of class that day the teacher
had the students sign in by going up to the smart board and move their name into a tri-Venn
diagram. The three categories were white, pinnate, and up. The pattern that the students
were trying t figure out had many different parts to it including color, type of leaf, and direction.
The students were able to follow through with this practice standard by finding their own way of
thinking in order to solve the problem. As mentioned earlier, the students did have the
opportunity to talk with each other about how and why they got their answers, which helped the
students follow through with understanding the reasoning of others and different ways of getting
other answers. Students continued the same method of understanding the meaning of the problem
and coming up with a solution pathway during the number line activity that the class completed.
Last, the second math practice standard reason abstractly and quantitatively, was
observed during the number line activity. The teacher had a number in her head that the class had
to figure out. The teacher started out by setting up a number line that went all the way to 150 by
tens. The class counted with her while making the number line and then started making
predictions to what the number might be. The students would quantitatively guess a number and
the teacher would tell them if the number was greater than or less than the students then
contextualized where they should and should not guess on the number line and then make
another prediction to what the number is. At one point there were a few students who the teacher
thought were acting up and had them go back to their seat, but they then became somewhat
Brancati 3
disconnected from the activity. To conclude, the number line activity was a great opportunity for
Overall, this lesson study did a great job of showing the specific details of the three main
focuses of our time at the class; TPE: pedagogy for teaching math, math practice standard 1:
make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, and math practice standard 2: reason
abstractly and quantitatively. As great of an opportunity as this was to learn about the specific
parts of the math pedagogy, I found that it got lost in other parts of the lesson study. Some of my
peers mentioned that only girls were being called on, but sometimes that is the luck of the draw
of the Popsicle sticks. One thing I want to remember for my class when I am a teacher is to make
sure that even when a student might be uncooperative to always put them somewhere where they
can follow the instruction instead of away where they can get lost and not follow along.
Brancati 4