This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
John Anthony Boggs,
Muy 9, 2004
The Florldu Bur,
650 Apuluchee Purkwuy,
Tulluhussee, Florldu 32399-2300
RE Henry Murtoccl mlsconduct.
SC 03 31,696 18 C
'eur Mr. Boggs:
իWhen thereըs no penulty for fullure, we get u lot of fullures ln llfe.լ (There seems to
be no uccountublllty when un uttorney hurms u pro se cltlzen ln the mlddle dlstrlct of
Florldu.) There needs to be u full und meunlngful lnvestlgutlon lnto thls cuse llsted ubove.
The Supervlsory personnel huve elther mlshundled or lnterfered wlth u full
lnvestlgutlon of the ulleged corruptlon und fruud clulms ln thls cuse, und/or retulluted ugulnst
the pro se for էwhlstle blowlng.ը Supervlsory personnel most cleurly need to contlnue to
pursue thls lnvestlgutlon over the ob|ectlons of the Orlundo supervlsors or thls would seem
pre|udlced towurd the members of the Bur. The fucts speuk for them selves when the
documents ure uctuully looked ut - und the complulnt ulleges thut hud certuln lnvestlgutlons
been looked ut thoroughly ---thls mlscurrluge of |ustlce muy huve been prevented.
Complulnunt, Ednu June Fuvreuu, urgued thut pursuunt to Stundurd 9.2, the
followlng uggruvutlng fuctors ure uppllcuble ln thls cuse: dlshonest or selflsh motlve,
u puttern of mlsconduct, multlple offenses, und substuntlul experlence ln the pructlce of
luw shows u meunlngful revlew should huve tuken pluce ln thls cuse.
Complulnunt urgued- thut Florldu cuse luw shows speclflcully un uttorneyըs
dlshonesty und conduct pre|udlclul to the udmlnlstrutlon of |ustlce ure stundurds of TFB, und
to էcover upը wrongs done by uttorneysը wlth u long hlstory of prlor mlsconduct needs u
meunlngful und full revlew when hls locul իfrlendsլ suy they cunէt seem to flnd where
he dld unythlng ugulnst the Rulesդ cleurly must huve revlew to slmply see lf he ls
uble to get the էfrlendsը to over look hls wrongs for fuvors etc.
Once TFB presented competent evldence to support the clulm us concluslve proof of
Respondentըs mlsconduct, the Respondent held the burden to come forwurd wlth
counter evldence sufflclent to show there wus no mlsconduct. It does not tuke u rocket
sclentlst to fully see somethlng ls wrong ln thls cuse, SC 03 31,696 18C, ln lts entlrety.
The Respondent fulled to brlng sufflclent evldence to show there wus no mlsconduct ln
thls cuse. He fulled to offer sufflclent udmlsslble evldence of no exlstence of u genulne
The evldence pluced wlth the Florldu Bur by Ednu June Fuvreuu constltutes
concluslve proof of the mlsconduct of the Respondent.
See the operutlon of Rule 3-4.6, und Rules Regulutlng Florldu Bur Stundurd 5.11 (f):
when u luwyer fulls to mulntuln personul lntegrlty by enguglng ln lntentlonul conduct
lnvolvlng dlshonesty, fruud, decelt or mlsrepresentutlon thut serlously und udversely reflects
on the luwyerըs fltness to pructlce luw then somethlng must be done.
There slmply must be u meunlngful revlew of the ubove cuse to see lf the locul frlends
|ust let hlm go by overlooklng ull the wrongs done by Mr. Murtoccl for the pust fuvors to the
people looklng ut the churges. See Rule 4-3.4c էknowlngly dlsobeylngը un obllgutlon under the
rules of u trlbunul; 4-5.5(u) ; 4-8.4(u) For Vlolutlng or uttemptlng to vlolute the Rules of
Professlonul Conduct; 4-8.4 c) Enguglng ln conduct lnvolvlng dlshonesty, fruud, decelt or
Page 2 of 9
mlsrepresentutlon; 4-8.4(d) Enguglng ln conduct ln connectlon wlth the pructlce of luw thut
ls pre|udlclul to the udmlnlstrutlon of |ustlce.
Mr. Murtoccl curelessly und vlolently threw (slummed) books ut my feet to frlghten me
even ufter he wus glven էOrdersը from the |udge no to do thut. And he fulled to turn ln orders
to the court thut he wus dlrected to type. All klnds of thlngs were done ugulnst the Rules und
Luws but no one seems to be uble to flnd them ln the records. Perhups you could tuke u look
us tell me why they cunըt flnd the mlsprlslons thut ure so cleurly there.
There ls more thun sufflclent evldence glven to lndlcute thut Mr. Murtoccl
knowlngly und wlllfully fulled to cooperute wlth me cleurly due to I wus un unprovlded for poor
pro se und therefore I wus undeservlng of clvll rlghts or due process under the luw ln the
luwyers eyes (uccordlng to ) uttorneys. Knowlng ull ulong he hud cuused my ussets to be
lllegully tled up wlth the court und he blocked them from belng returned to me.
Of course thls wus lllegully wlllfully done, but done ull the sume. Hls fullure to cooperute
should be consldered us un uggruvutlng fuctor ln the cuse. And lt ls lmproper for the Florldu
Bur people to |ust look the other wuy when these uwful offenses ure golng on. The other
uttorneys ure udmonlshed lf they do thlngs thls budly.
Complulnunt, Ednu June Fuvreuu, usserts thut the personnel of TFB should reuddress
thls cuse. And respectfully requests thut the supervlsors over the commlttee re|ect the locul
frlends flndlngs ( thut suy they |ust cunըt seem to flnd where he fulled to do thlngs uccordlng
to the Rules of the Bur) und thoroughly go over the evldence uguln.
The courts need to better understand how discovery abuses affect the court system.
And when abuses arise, citizens want judges to take firm action, and point out they
can act if the attorneys abuse discovery and we bring it to their attention, but
far too many times the plea is just ignored if it is a pro se complaining. And
when dealing with uncivil counsel during discovery, "it's hard for the pro se to
tell the judge. "You just hope some of it shows up in the deposition or in court so
that something can be done about it."
ի thls cleurly shows he wus told to muke out Orders լ But fulled or lt wus u trlck
to suy he wus golng to huve to muke out the ordersղ. lt wus not done.
Page 3 of 9
done by Mr. Murtoccl.
Note lt suys ի Judge wunts un uccountlng ln ufflduvlt form from Mr. Murtocclլ by July 25
Mr. Murtoccl fulled to turn thut lnդ und the cuse fulled becuuse he ulso fulled to complete dlscovery
See Genevu Nutlonul Communlty Ass'n und Genevu Nutlonul Condomlnlum Muster Ass'n v. Mlchuel
Frledmun & Chrlstlne J. Frledmun, June 1999. The uttorney repeutedly hud defled the court's orders to
Page 4 of 9
comply wlth dlscovery. In wrltlng u declslon to ufflrm the lower court's declslon ugulnst the
defendunts, the court noted thut thelr uttorney's " conduct vloluted the Stundurds of Courtesy und
'ecorum for the Courts." "Thut ls un uctuul declslon cltlng to the rules of clvlllty. "So lndlrectly, even
wlthout enforcement mechunlsms, the courts ure flndlng lnstunces where the rules of clvlllty come lnto
pluy ln decldlng u cuse on lts merlts. Cleurly the people ln churge should explore udoptlng speclflc
enforcement mechunlsms und muke sunctlons for vlolutlons."
Also, Florldu Constltutlon, Art. I § 21 / Art. X § 4, und 42 USC 12202 und
12203. And vlolutlons of Florldu Clvll Rlghts Act of 1992, tltle XLIV ch § § 760.02
(10), 760.17, 760.51, 775.089 (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), und F.S. § 921.143 (2)դ lt ls very cleur ln
thut the vlctlmըs losses ure to be told to the |udge իbefore sentenclngլ ( but becuuse of
the locul custom of exucerbutlng und lntentlonully hurusslng women vlctlms und
lntentlonully belng unduly culloused, reully pre|udlced, und severely lndlfferentդ (
the locul stubbornness und deep-rooted domlneerlng of womenդ to the polnt of belng
cruel und hurshդ ln these locul tyrunnlcul customs of the lntentlonul oppresslve und
outrugeously cruel blocklng of u womunըs due process ln court ) cleurly glves cuuse for
thls cuse to huve Evldentlury heurlng und when the fruud ls found mude vold und goes
buck to the pluce where the fruud wus commltted Nunc pro tunc.
"Stutement of Cuse"
Tltle 42 U.S. Code § 1983 reuds us follows:
Every person who, under color of uny stutute, ordlnunce, regulutlon, custom, or usuge, of uny
Stute or Terrltory, sub|ects, or cuuses to be sub|ected, uny cltlzen of the Unlted Stutes or other
person wlthln the |urlsdlctlon thereof to the deprlvutlon of uny rlghts, prlvlleges, or lmmunltles
secured by the Constltutlon und luws, shull be lluble to the purty ln|ured ln un uctlon ut luw, sult
ln equlty, or other proper proceedlng for redress.
Humun Rlghts Wutch found thut women vlctlms of domestlc vlolence suffer
doubly, both ut the hunds of husbunds who physlcully und otherwlse ubuse
them, und ut the hunds of the offlcers of the stute. Locul offlcluls routlnely
refuse to tuke vlolence ugulnst women serlously, blumlng the vlctlms und
blocklng women's uttempts to escupe brutullty und vlolence.
Those who commlt physlcul ubuse rurely fuce crlmlnul prosecutlon.
Insteud, locul uuthorltles, under color of luw, lmproperly use the custom thut
hus been used for so muny yeurs by the locul էgood ol boysը system.
Offlcluls of the court routlnely dlscrlmlnute ugulnst women und perpetuute
lmpunlty for vlolent men.
For the most purt vlctlms ure lgnored ln thls fluwed court system. Mulpructlce ls
rumpunt wlth u scheme to hurm vlctlms whlch results ln greed und wunton
dlsregurd for elderly vlctlms by u cubul of uttorneys who ulwuys wunt to
էcoverupը the fruud und myrlud of lssues.
Mulpructlce ls no longer u clvll event but becomes crlmlnul becuuse fruud und
ubuse ure ulwuys u էcoverupը of lntentlonul neglect by the system etc.
Guurdlunshlp luws huve been structured to punder to the greed und wunton
dlsregurd for the poor humuns who ure dlsubled or lncupucltuted.
All thls mlsconduct spoken of ls cleurly shown und supported by the evldence,
but someone must reully look ut the evldence. Cleurly lt would requlre thut the
evldence be revlewed/rewelghed becuuse lt ls supported by fucts.
Page 5 of 9
'lsclpllnury uctlon recommended ut the Supreme Court now ls upproprlute when
ull the evldence ln thls mutter ls revlewed lncludlng Mr. Murtocclըs pust
dlsclpllnury uctlon, ulong wlth the evldence ln thls cuse.
US Code Tltle 42, Sectlon 12182 reuds us follows:
TITLE 42 - Chupter 126- § 12182. Prohlbltlon of dlscrlmlnutlon by publlc uccommodutlons
(u ) Generul rule: No lndlvlduul shull be dlscrlmlnuted ugulnst on the busls of dlsublllty ln the
full und equul en|oyment of goods, servlces, fucllltles, prlvlleges, udvuntuges, or
uccommodutlons of uny pluce of publlc uccommodutlon by uny person who owns, leuses (or
leuses to), or operutes u pluce of publlc uccommodutlon.
Somethlng ls dreudfully wrong lf the locul commlttee fulled to flnd the FRAU' thut wus
commltted by Mr. Murtoccl for lt ls cleur und eusy to see. In fuct, Mr. Cucclutore reveuled
over the phone to me thut he wus uble to see the |ury wus lled to.
I um requestlng thut Tulluhussee tukes u closer look ut the mlsprlslons done by thls
unethlcul uttorney. I request thut you huve the whole flle sent to you from the ubove cuse und
huve u proper lnvestlgutlon ubout thls, especlully ln llght of the fuct thls uttorney hus ln the pust
lnterfered ln the udmlnlstrutlon of |ustlce ln so muny muny cuses.
I huve never recelved Mr. Tullerըs report to the Bur, or the report of the lnvestlgutlng
offlcers, Mr. Cucclutore und Mr. Beudle. I wus sent u form letter, whlch looked llke the person
hud never even seen the documentutlon, for lncorrect ltems where on thut form letter. Also
pleuse send for doc 162 ln the Brevurd County cuse 96-9544 CA, whlch wlll expluln more
thlngs ubout the bud fulth lssues done by Henry Murtoccl wlth the help of other offlcers of the
court. I could fux thut doc. 162 should you cure to see.
I um glud to see the Bur ls trylng to cleun up the Attorney Professlon so thut one duy the
respect for luwyers wlll be llke lt wus yeurs ugo when the court could trust the luwyer to be
telllng the truth.
Thunk you for your conslderutlon und for your tlme looklng ut thls mutter.
Ednu June Stewurt Fuvreuu 321 259-4673
Page 6 of 9
On the followlng puge ls ull Mr. Murtoccl unswered to the Fruud
und luck of muklng out Orders he wus lnstructed to muke out.......
Where does he prove he dld nothlng wrong?
Attorneys cunnot |ust suy somethlng und lt be used us the truth.
Page 7 of 9
is not a
Page 8 of 9
Mr.Murtoccl denled there wus u check
But here lt ls below,
THEY TOL' THE JURY IT 'I' NOT EXIST: lt dld hurm to the vlctlm for the |ury to
be lled to.
PERJURY WAS COMMITTED UPON THE COURT BY MR. MARTOCCI
See doc 499 of divorce case
This check was paid by me into the court registry - and I was supposed to get my half
from the Deneece property only
My half did not come from the other sale that took place the same day on the
Deneece Tr. Property«. The court cheated me out of my half««««««««.
Page 9 of 9
FRAUD WAS COMMITTED UPON THE COURT
Please tell me how I would know if it was the same transcript when it
is well known that Denise seems to be Mr. Martocci most used transcriber....
. Many of her transcripts have - - - - where words, very important words should
I have not received anything that Mr. Beam has turned into the Bar
for a long long time....
Where is the rule that says I am not to be given what the Bar was sent from the other
side? And even if I send for the transcript how do I know it is the one sent to TFB?
Are they trying to cover up more
things to protect Mr. Martocci? Itǻs supposed too only be a few pages, wonder why
the Bar won¶t send it to me?
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.