Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AbstractA novel compact wearable antenna printed on paper isolate the antenna in order to preserve its radiation character-
is presented. The antenna comprises a nonresonant coplanar istic as much as possible and to prevent hazardous biological
monopole antenna placed on a miniaturized artificial magnetic effects. Artificial magnetic conductors (AMCs) have been suc-
conductor (AMC) (total size of 0.14 0 0.14 0 0.01 0 at
700 MHz). The manufacturing process only requires a commercial cessfully employed to cope with this problem for their capabil-
desktop inkjet printer and conductive nano-ink. The effective- ity of isolating an antenna from the surrounding environment
ness of the proposed configuration (monopole above AMC) with [6], [8], [13].
respect to the unloaded monopole or to the monopole above a It is interesting to notice that few of the proposed wearable
metallic ground plane is proved with on-body measurements in antennas work at frequencies lower than 1 GHz where some fre-
the sub-GHz band.
quency ranges are allocated as in the case of some LTE channels
Index TermsArtificial magnetic conductor (AMC), inkjet (700960 MHz), ISM and GSM bands (900 MHz), and wireless
antenna, miniaturization, on-body, small antenna, sub-GHz, sensor networks [3], [9], [12][14]. This is probably due to the
wearable antenna, wideband, wireless applications. cumbersome dimensions of an antenna working in the sub-GHz
I. I NTRODUCTION region. However, wider range, better in-building penetration,
and lower operative cost with respect to higher frequencies
1536-1225 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
1928 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 15, 2016
Fig. 1. Top view of the AMC screen. The zoomed area remarks the periodic
square unit cell with periodicity D = 3 cm. The footprint of the eight-arm
element is H = 5.5 cm (highlighted in blue).
Fig. 3. Frequency response of the AMC screen: (a) real part and (b) imaginary
part of the equivalent AMC impedance.