6 views

Uploaded by Ahmad Fikri

bgudfhguidfh segf

- Manual de Tension de Bandas
- Parts Guide Manual Bizhub C20_A0FD013
- Tabel Pulley
- LM Guide Technical Descriptions
- Misumi s5m Pulley p1117
- Tolomatic Rod and Rodless Style Electric Actuators Brochure
- Isuzu Timing Belt
- Catalogo UNIT
- TASKalfa250ci 300ci 400ci 500ci PartList
- New Base Isolation Technique for Earthquake Resistant Constr
- 5708
- Marc2005_ReleaseGuide
- is.2508.1984
- Duties of Deputy Director
- Helical Inline Geared Motors manual.pdf
- Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behavior
- MP3500-4500 Drum Ground
- XHD DT Primary Scraper
- C8Phy12 Friction(InterlockingofSurfacesorSurfaceParticles) StaticSlidingRollingFriction Drag(FrictionThroghFluids) IncresinFric(TreadingRoughing) DecresinFric(Lubricants-BallBearing-ByShape).pdf
- Copy of Raport DWI April awal.xlsx

You are on page 1of 12

Consider a belt which moves on the pulley with the small angle of lap, . Consider that T is the

tension at point a, and T + dT is the tension at point b. R is the small surface for the pulley rim

and the touching belt (see Figure 1). Figure 2 shows the triangle force, where R can be measured.

Assume that the change on angle is so small, d and the change of the belt tension is dT,

therefore ;

R = T d---------------(1)

The coefficient of friction (COF), also known as a frictional coefficient or friction coefficient,

symbolized by the Greek letter , is a dimensionless scalar value which describes the ratio of the

force of friction between two bodies and the force pressing them together. The coefficient of

friction depends on the materials used; for example, ice on steel has a low coefficient of friction,

while rubber on pavement has a high coefficient of friction. Coefficients of friction range from

near zero to greater than one under good conditions, a tire on concrete may have a coefficient

of friction of 1.7.

When the surfaces are conjoined, Coulomb friction becomes a very poor approximation (for

example, adhesive tape resists sliding even when there is no normal force, or a negative normal

force). In this case, the frictional force may depend strongly on the area of contact. Some drag

racing tires are adhesive in this way. However, despite the complexity of the fundamental physics

behind friction, the relationships are accurate enough to be useful in many applications.

The force of friction is always exerted in a direction that opposes movement (for kinetic friction)

or potential movement (for static friction) between the two surfaces. For example, a curling stone

sliding along the ice experiences a kinetic force slowing it down. For an example of potential

movement, the drive wheels of an accelerating car experience a frictional force pointing forward;

if they did not, the wheels would spin, and the rubber would slide backwards along the

pavement. Note that it is not the direction of movement of the vehicle they oppose, it is the

direction of (potential) sliding between tire and road.

and cannot be found through calculations. Rougher surfaces tend to have higher effective values.

Most dry materials in combination have friction coefficient values between 0.3 and 0.6. Values

outside this range are rarer, but Teflon, for example, can have a coefficient as low as 0.04. A

value of zero would mean no friction at all, an elusive property even magnetic levitation

vehicles have drag. Rubber in contact with other surfaces can yield friction coefficients from 1 to

2. Occasionally it is maintained that is always < 1, but this is not true. While in most relevant

applications < 1, a value above 1 merely implies that the force required to slide an object along

the surface is greater than the normal force of the surface on the object. For example, silicone

rubber or acrylic rubber-coated surfaces have a coefficient of friction that can be substantially

larger than 1.

Both static and kinetic coefficients of friction depend on the pair of surfaces in contact; their

values are usually approximately determined experimentally. For a given pair of surfaces, the

coefficient of static friction is usually larger than that of kinetic friction; in some sets the two

coefficients are equal, such as Teflon-on-Teflon.

In the case of kinetic friction, the direction of the friction force may or may not match the

direction of motion: a block sliding atop a table with rectilinear motion is subject to friction

directed along the line of motion; an automobile making a turn is subject to friction acting

perpendicular to the line of motion (in which case it is said to be 'normal' to it). The direction of

the static friction force can be visualized as directly opposed to the force that would otherwise

cause motion, were it not for the static friction preventing motion. In this case, the friction force

exactly cancels the applied force, so the net force given by the vector sum, equals zero. It is

important to note that in all cases, Newton's first law of motion holds.

While it is often stated that the COF is a "material property," it is better categorized as a "system

property." Unlike true material properties (such as conductivity, dielectric constant, yield

strength), the COF for any two materials depends on system variables like temperature, velocity,

atmosphere and also what are now popularly described as aging and deaging times; as well as on

geometric properties of the interface between the materials. For example, a copper pin sliding

against a thick copper plate can have a COF that varies from 0.6 at low speeds (metal sliding

against metal) to below 0.2 at high speeds when the copper surface begins to melt due to

frictional heating. The latter speed, of course, does not determine the COF uniquely; if the pin

diameter is increased so that the frictional heating is removed rapidly, the temperature drops, the

pin remains solid and the COF rises to that of a 'low speed' test.

Known that the coefficient of friction, = friction / action of touching surface, therefore

dT = R --------------(2)

dT = (Td) dT/T = d

Antilog of 0.4342

= angle of lap

T1 = m1g

T2 = (m1-m2) g

=m2g

= 90

Log e T1/T2 =

=0.66/ 90 = 0.0073

EQUIPMENT

QUANTITY APPARATUS

wall with ;

groove, and fit groove

1 Flat belt

1 V - belt

hook m2

2 Surface plate

500g, and 1kg.

PROCEDURES

2. Fix the flat belt at an angle of 60 degees and through the correct groove.

4. Wind the cord as many as you can on pulley in the opposite direction of flat belt and hang

500g weight hook at the end of cord and state 500g as the first value of m2.

5. Support the weight hook m2 by hand at early stage to avoid from moving downwards due

to the rotation of pulley. Then add load little by little at weight hook m1 until m2 become

stable. State the load as the value of m1.

6. Repeat step 4 and 5 by using the value of m2 as 700g, 900g, 1100g and 1300g. state the

total load of m1 and m2.

7. Then, repeat step 2 until 6 by fixing the belt at different angle of lap, 90 degrees , 120

degrees and 180 degrees. State the total value of load m1 and m2.

2. Fix the V-belt at an angle of 90 degrees and through the incorrect V-groove at (b).

4. Wind the cord as many as you can on pulley in the opposite direction of flat belt and hang

500g weight hook at the end of cord and state 500g as the first value of m2.

5. Support the weight hook m2 by hand at early stage to avoid from moving downwards due

to the rotation of pulley. Then add load little by little at weight hook m1 until m2 become

stable. State the load as the value of m1.

6. Repeat step 4 and 5 by using the value of m2 as 700g, 900g, 1100g and 1300g. state the

total load of m1 and m2.

7. Then, repeat step 2 until 6 by fixing the belt for the V-belt with correct fitting of groove

(c). state the total value of load m1 and m2.

RESULTS

Table 2- Test 1

No 90 120 150 180

m1(g) m2(g) m1(g) m2(g) m1(g) m2(g) m1(g) m2(g)

1 1400 500 1200 500 1000 500 900 500

2 2200 700 1700 700 1400 700 1300 700

3 2700 900 2200 900 1900 900 1700 900

4 3300 1100 2700 1100 2400 1100 2000 1100

5 3500 1300 3200 1300 3000 1300 2400 1300

1 13.73 8.83 11.77 6.87 9.81 4.91 8.83 3.92

2 21.58 14.72 16.68 9.81 13.78 6.87 12.75 5.89

3 26.49 17.66 21.53 12.75 18.64 9.81 16.68 7.85

4 32.37 21.58 26.49 15.7 23.54 12.75 19.62 8.83

5 34.34 21.58 31.39 18.64 29.43 16.68 23.54 10.79

T1/T2 1.52 1.69 1.87 2.18

loge

[T1/T2] 0.66 0.73 0.81 0.95

Angel of lap of belt, at angle of , = 90

No Flat belt (a) V-belt large groove (b) V-belt with correct / fit groove (c)

m1(g) m2(g) m1(g) m2(g) m1(g) m2(g)

1 1400 500 600 500 600 500

2 2200 700 800 700 900 700

3 2700 900 1100 900 1100 900

4 3300 1100 1300 1100 1400 1100

5 3500 1300 1400 1300 1500 1300

1 13.73 8.83 4.9 5.89 0.98 4.91 5.89 0.98 4.91

2 21.58 14.72 6.86 7.85 0.98 6.87 8.83 1.96 6.87

3 26.49 17.66 8.83 10.79 1.96 8.83 10.79 1.96 8.83

4 32.37 21.58 10.79 12.75 1.96 10.79 13.73 2.94 10.79

5 34.34 21.58 12.76 13.73 0.98 12.75 14.72 1.96 12.76

Table 3-Test 2

OBSERVATION

A cord was stuck into a screw when we change the pulley into angle 180 and was make a

rectification to the result.

When we increase the angle of lap, the value of weight that we need to stabilize the m2

hook also decrease.

In the test 2, flat belt need more weight,m1 to stabilize the hook,m2 than the V belt large

groove and v belt with correct or fit groove.

When we increase the angle of lap, the value of tight belt will decrease as we can look at

table 2-test 1.

CALCULATION

Calculation to get T1 :

T1 = m1g

We assume that gravity, g is 9.81 m/s

T1 = 1.4x9.81

= 13.73 N.

Calculation to get T2 :

T2 = (m1-m2)g

m1 = 1400g @1.4 kg

m2 = 500g @ 0.5kg

T2 = (1.4-0.5)9.81

= 8.829 N

= 128.51N

= 84.37 N

T1/T2 = 128.51/84.37=1.52

= 0.66

= 90

Log e T1/T2 =

=0.66/ 90 = 0.0073

DISCUSSIONS

1. Based on data T1 , T2 from TEST 1, plot the graph of T1 versus T2 according to the

angle of lap on the same graph paper. Discuss the relation between the changes of driving

force with the angle of lap.

From the graph of T1 versus T2, we can see the relation between the changes of driving

force with the angle of lap. The relation is when the angle of lap increase, so the force

that we need to stabilize the m2 hook also will increase.

2. Based on data from TEST 1, plot the graph of log[T1/T2] versus angle of lap. Then

calculate the value of coefficient of friction of flat belt and review on the result.

= 90

Log e T1/T2 =

=0.66/ 90 = 0.0073

= 120

Log e T1/T2 =

Coefficient of friction between belt and pulley, = [Log e T1/T2] / =0.73/ 120 = 0.0061

= 150

Log e T1/T2 =

= 180

Log e T1/T2 =

Coefficient of friction between belt and pulley, = [Log e T1/T2] / =0.95/ 180 =

0.0053

As what we can see from a graph log e[T1-T2] versus angle of lap, we can say that when

value angle of the lap increase, so the value of tension, T will decrease. And from the

value of coefficient that we get above , we also can say that, when the value of angle lap

increase, the value of coefficient will be decrease.

3. Based on data from the TEST 2, plot the graph (T1-T2) versus T1 according to the

different type of belt on the same graph. Review the results.

From our observation of the graph (T1-T2) versus T1 , we can say that V-belt large

groove(b) need more tension (T) to stabilize a m2 hook than the V- belt with correct or fit

groove (c) and flat belt. So we can say that , the V-belt large groove posses a less friction

than the V- belt with correct groove and flat belt.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, from this belt friction experiment, we can learn the relation between tight belt and

angle of lap for flat belt. From the result f this experiment, we can say that the tight of the belt

will be decrease when the angle of lap for flat belt increase. Beside that, during this experiment

student also can look and compare the driving force at certain angle of lap of the flat belt, v belt

with incorrect groove and v belt with correct groove. We also can make a conclusion that the

ideal belt is that of the lowest tension which does not slip in high loads.

REFERENCE

2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_(mechanical)

- Manual de Tension de BandasUploaded byAlejandro Fdz
- Parts Guide Manual Bizhub C20_A0FD013Uploaded byHugo Luis Escalante
- Tabel PulleyUploaded byDimas D'rooyal Borooss'
- LM Guide Technical DescriptionsUploaded byyuvarajsukumaran
- Misumi s5m Pulley p1117Uploaded bytigor caraka
- Tolomatic Rod and Rodless Style Electric Actuators BrochureUploaded byElectromate
- Isuzu Timing BeltUploaded byserraoxx
- Catalogo UNITUploaded byhareudang
- TASKalfa250ci 300ci 400ci 500ci PartListUploaded byvladimir2426
- New Base Isolation Technique for Earthquake Resistant ConstrUploaded byravi1625
- 5708Uploaded byСергей Иванов
- Marc2005_ReleaseGuideUploaded byMahmud Kori Effendi
- is.2508.1984Uploaded byDeepak Jain
- Duties of Deputy DirectorUploaded byJai Narain
- Helical Inline Geared Motors manual.pdfUploaded byHEMANTKHERA
- Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behaviorUploaded byHalim Mamani
- MP3500-4500 Drum GroundUploaded byRandula Sigera
- XHD DT Primary ScraperUploaded byivom
- C8Phy12 Friction(InterlockingofSurfacesorSurfaceParticles) StaticSlidingRollingFriction Drag(FrictionThroghFluids) IncresinFric(TreadingRoughing) DecresinFric(Lubricants-BallBearing-ByShape).pdfUploaded byanuk1989
- Copy of Raport DWI April awal.xlsxUploaded byLeo Gusty
- Seal Friction Parker SealsUploaded byChristian Mavarez
- SCF2C7(RAFIDA)Uploaded byJeanShuen
- Rieter - E 35 OMEGA lap.pdfUploaded byashar khan
- JURNALUploaded byIntan Puri
- Design of Conveyor in Metric UnitsUploaded bymuhd.qasim
- Act FactoryUploaded byHimanshu Jain
- PtD Project ReferencesUploaded byHarshGupta
- wd_14_abr_07(1)-1Uploaded byIndrajeet
- is.12213.1987Uploaded bySHAIJU
- DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF A POWER HACKSAW MACHINE.pdfUploaded byGokul Gocool

- Bab 01- IntroductionUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- ruma tipuUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- Zhang 2005Uploaded byAhmad Fikri
- Air Conditioning System 1Uploaded byAhmad Fikri
- BDA31103_LECT03 - 2DOF_Part 2_Sem 2 1617Uploaded byAhmad Fikri
- preventive maintenanceUploaded byVikas Sethi
- TEST 1 Skema 2Uploaded bySmith
- SlideUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- Formulas.pdfUploaded byDono Dorjpagma
- fyuUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- pptUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- 215 Sample ChapterUploaded bySreekumar Rajendrababu
- dfgfdsgfdgfdgdfgdfgUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- Leadership TheoriesUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- Conduction IVUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- Psychrometric ChartUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- BDA 40703 FOC Activity SheetUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- Group Assignment - Case Study (Revised 10 Oct 2012) (1)Uploaded byAhmad Fikri
- Bda 10203 Statics OverviewUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- Assignment 2 Case StudyUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- kokokoUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- 57769468-Car-History.docxUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- gregergregggregUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- 6 Gantt ChartUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- A Building Structure is Shown in Figure 1 and 2 the Node and Element Data is Documented in Table 1Uploaded byAhmad Fikri
- HintUploaded byAhmad Fikri
- Material PropertiesUploaded byAhmad Fikri

- 2. Laws of Motion and Circular MotionUploaded byAnkit Lakshya
- Typical Retaining WallUploaded bydskumar49
- lesson plan-k-5 9 24 10 02 15bUploaded byapi-326177943
- INA - PERMAGLIDE - INFORMATIONSUploaded bynunesalessandro1975
- Marc2005_ReleaseGuideUploaded byMahmud Kori Effendi
- IC EngineUploaded byShreepal Chila
- NXT LFS Shearing CapabilitiesUploaded byLuka Parma
- Technical Guidelines 2nd EditionUploaded byMario Luis Lourenco
- Linear GuidewaysUploaded byKótai Péter
- 18166001_KEY QUESTIONS (1)Uploaded byAkif Prasla
- MATHEMATICSUploaded bySri Sai
- Spe 170566Uploaded byilkerkozturk
- Tarkett Collection for Professionals 2013 2 PartUploaded byDan George III
- Fatigue Life of Riveted JointUploaded bykamlesh
- FRICTION LOSSESUploaded byJan Vincent Martinez Madayag
- Chapter 3B Friction.pptUploaded by0JTING
- A Study on Friction and Wear Reduction Due to Porosity in Powder Metallurgic Gear Materials-9Uploaded byEdilberto Murrieta Luna
- Pianc Berm BWUploaded byeduardovalera
- F13_CE470Ch3Bolts_Part2Uploaded byIhab El Aghoury
- Design of Belt Conveyors Part 1Uploaded byanirban687
- Response of Buried Steel Pipelines Subjected to Relative Axial Movement WijewickremeUploaded byGottfried Leibniz
- Textile AntistaticUploaded byAmber Yasmin
- Hercules Pot Type BearingUploaded bySunil Kumar
- B14 Homework 2Uploaded byvicejunior
- Irc-78-Pile-capacity p 25 20 mUploaded byhghgh
- BRIAN ARMSTRONG - 1994 - A Survey of Models, Analysis Tools and Compensations Methods for the Machines With Friction.Uploaded byfiregold2
- [BS en 13361-2013] -- Geosynthetic Barriers. Characteristics Required for Use in the Construction of Reservoirs and Dams.Uploaded byMichał Kisielewski
- Pressure Loss CalculationsUploaded byAgus Manggala
- cl-HWK-17-01.pdfUploaded byRaúl A. Santacruz
- April 2018 GEAS Refresher 1 SolutionsUploaded byHenryboi Cañas