JOE STEWART’S FIRST AFFADAVIT

IN THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA EDNA JANE FAVREAU,
Petitioner,

v CASE No. WALTER F. FAVREAU,
Defendant.

97-9644-CA

_________________________________
STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF BREVARD

AFFIDAVIT OF JOSEPH N. STEWART After being duly sworn and cautioned, I, Joseph N. Stewart do state the following under oath: 1. In 1981, when Mr. Favreau first started seeing my ……………mother, my family lived at 120 Moonstone Ct. in ……………Daytona Beach, Fl. 2. I was in the 5th grade and went to school at Port Orange Elementary. In 1981, my mother was working for Century 21 Realty and Mr. Walter F. Favreau did not have a job. Mr. Walter F. Favreau did not have a car. I remember he would come over and borrow my mother’s car. My mother had her own leased residence at 120 Moonstone Ct. and that Mr. Favreau did not live with us. When Mr. Favreau alleged in his deposition that he “took care of [my mother] and her three children at that time” he was not speaking truthfully. Mr. Walter F. Favreau has written checks out of my mother’s bank account as early as 1981. When Mr. Walter F. Favreau alleged that my mother was “domineering” this is not a term I would ever apply in reference to my mother. If anything, this is a term I would apply to Mr. Favreau instead. Furthermore, I have never witnessed my mother being domineering towards him or anyone else.
Page 1 of 6

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

My mother was never mean to me and always did things to help me be a wise person. My mother was not of poor health until she entered the relationship with Mr. Walter F. Favreau. I took time from work and came to be with my ill mother in the deposition and also to return the leather jacket personally to Walter Favreau. Walter Favreau had the jacket in his closet but he had gained too much weight to wear it so he gave it to me to wear to my Christmas Band concert in 1988 and I have pictures of me wearing it that day. I believe Mr. Walter F. Favreau’s claim that the jacket was not the one he gave me is in fact an attempt to make a fraudulent claim for the cash value of an ”Italian” leather jacket. When his attorney Henry Martocci started making racist remarks about it being a “gook” jacket because it was made in Korea, I found that comment to be very offensive and a totally improper remark for a member of the Florida Bar to make. If Henry Martocci is any example of how attorneys work in Brevard County Florida, it is a shame. Because of the long trip to come to be with my mother who is too ill to go alone to the courthouse (as described by her doctor), it is my belief that because there was no deposition(that being due to Mr. Favreau’s attorney being so bombastic and seemingly determined to stop the deposition, it is my opinion that Mr. Favreau should be responsible for my expenses on the wasted trip. According to the orders made by the judge my mother was to be allowed to video for her own personal use all the depositions and hearings etc. I believe this attempt to prevent her from having a videotape of the deposition for her own use (as she has orders from a judge to allow her to) was done to upset my mother and cause additional expense to this case, and that
Page 2 of 6

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

the attorney Henry Martocci should be sanctioned for doing that.

19.

Henry Martocci changed what the judge ordered regarding the videotaping when the orders were typed up and that false statement had to be brought to the judge’s attention and another order had to be given with the true statement of the judge. My mother needs this over with for her health’s sake, and the actions of the attorney Henry Martocci, I believe, are designed to weaken this disabled woman to a state where she cannot fight for her day in court.

20.

______________________________ Joseph N. Stewart

JOE STEWART’S SECOND AFFADAVIT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR BREVARD COUNTY FLORIDA EDNA JANE FAVREAU Plaintiff v WALTER FAVREAU CASE NO. 96-9544 CA

Defendant ____________________

COMPULSORY JUDICIAL NOTICE TO THE COURT
AND

SECOND AFFIDAVIT OF JOSEPH NEAL STEWART

This Notice to the Court is to state I was assured the 1-12-98 deposition of Mr. Walter Favreau would take place
Page 3 of 6

My Mother checked for me before I left South Carolina for Florida and we were assured the deposition would take place. Atty Martocci alleges I panned the room with the video and took pictures of people in the room including the Bailiff (who was never even present in the room during any part of the deposition!) This attorney's allegations are simply not true and the video will show that. This attorney seems to be purposely delaying things and is unfairly trying to have my mother denied her right (as given to her by the orders of Judge Jackson) to videotape the deposition for her personal use. It seems that the attorney is afraid to have his own actions videotaped, and given the inappropriate behavior I have witnessed from him (outlined in my last affidavit to this Honorable Court), I don’t blame him. My Mother, since she has been married to the defendant, has declined greatly in physical health and well-being. The level of stress she is having to face in these situations it seems to me is orchestrated by the defendant's attorney to make her have a breakdown before she can complete her judicial actions. I urge the court to sanction the attorney Martocci for his frequent deviations from ethical practices, and not overlook his tactics in this matter; including changing Judge's orders in his favor when he writes them. (Why attorneys in your State are allowed to write Judge's orders themselves, is beyond me; It seems to open the door for "typos" in the Attorney's favor. I have witnessed the court document containing one of Atty. Martocci's "typos" regarding where he inserted the word "professional" into the Judge's orders concerning who would be responsible for the video-graphy, and the judge immediately had the order corrected to reflect his actual judgment when that was brought to his attention. I also ask the court to guarantee my mother the right to always be given a large room to have her depositions, or any other meetings with the defendant and his attorney. It has been shown to the court long ago that this was needed to accommodate her disability, yet, when we arrived at the courthouse for the deposition, she was pushed and ushered into a tiny room, inches away from the person responsible for her disability and his bombastic attorney, and no one at the courthouse even seemed to care that the judge had previously granted that she could have a large room. It is VITAL to my mother's health that she is granted this accommodation, and
Page 4 of 6

anyone who works on the floor where the proceedings are taking place should be made aware of the judge's orders regarding this ahead of time. My sister and I have made arrangements for someone to be with our mother on 3-4-98. And can anyone explain to me what the problem was at mother’s last hearing before the Hon. Judge Ed. Jackson, because my mother was there at 11:20, but the office help- told her the time had been changed to 3:30 so mother left word where she was going to the Law Library. When she returned at 3:15, she was told the hearing had taken place at 11:30 after all. Please take notice that mother has always wanted to mediate things but it is Mr. Favreau that dragged her into court and it is he that will not put any offers in writing (with 72 hours for her to look over the documents because she has a problem when she is rushed and panics too many times. This was no problem before, but now after that man abused and battered her so brutally that he was sentenced to a year in jail– after he plead guilty (according to the State Attorneys office records I saw) now rushing her is a big problem. Signed copy went to the attorney-Thomas
State of South Carolina By____________________________ Joseph N. Stewart

First affidavit was signed and put on record. The second affidavit was given to my attorney Billy Thomas to be put on record. The affidavits were also sent to The Florida Bar with my letter, as follows: ________________________________________________________________

JANE’S LETTER TO THE FLORIDA BAR:

When I first turned in my complaint to the Florida Bar something should have been done then. I have suffered many months of pain

because this attorney has used intimidation and tactics and mislead the court. On June 6th 2001 Mr. Martocci told the court

lies and again misled the court about me with direct lies and trickery. I need this investigated and brought to an end.

Page 5 of 6

It is past time to do something about this mayhem towards Jane Favreau. Doc. 177 is on record also (Orders showing Martocci was found guilty of saying inappropriate things to Jane)

It would be justice if the Florida Bar did something right and investigated this and asked the Florida Supreme Court to grant me a trial de novo because the proof is in the records that Attorney Martocci lied to the court in my case. I am elderly and I am not

well physically or emotionally and clearly because my assets are still with Mr. Favreau and Anna May. I am not well financially. There was

fraud used on the documents given to the court by Anna May Favreau.

The little that is left of my life should not be spent in court due to the bad actions of a Florida Attorney. I will send this affidavit in

with a formal complaint but things need expedited and you know that as I know that, I have spent all my life’s saving and 20 years of my life mixed up with the corruption of the Brevard County Courts.

And the Florida Bar is supposed to be in charge of looking after things that are done wrong by their members but they do not.

Page 6 of 6

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful