22 views

Uploaded by rsrkkk

- Unit 2 Exercises
- 3 - Impact of Non-monetary Rewards on Employees Motivation a Study of Commercial Banks in Karachi
- 20140303_TestMemo1.pdf
- 8[1].Basic Stat Inference
- 85_161_Virosil Pharma Brochure - (New)
- mata hati jku
- Solutions to Practice Problems for Week 3.pdf
- Lampiran 3 Output
- ENSY
- Chi Square Test
- RPG131.docx
- the beginning
- Frequencies Rosita
- math1040
- Basic Statistics Session 2
- Research Methodology- MB0050 (1)
- CFA Exam Result Explanation
- Risk Management in Geotechnical Engineering
- Racial Gap in Management of Pediatric Appendicitis Pain
- chi patrat.pdf

You are on page 1of 180

Notes

Output Created 12-Apr-2010 18:17:26

Comments

Input Data C:\Users\kiran\Desktop\Modifed

Data.sav

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter <none>

Weight <none>

Split File <none>

N of Rows in Working

Data File 350

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are

treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are based

on all the cases with valid data in

the specified range(s) for all

variables in each table.

Syntax CROSSTABS

/TABLES=PPDesignation Division

PPEducation PPExpinVSP BY

P1ASC P1BSC P2ASC P2BSC

P3ASC P3BSC P4ASC P4BSC

P5ASC P5BSC P6ASC P6BSC

P7BSC P7ASC P8ASC P8BSC

P9ASC P9BSC P10ASC P10BSC

P11ASC P11BSC

/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES

/STATISTICS=CHISQ CC LAMBDA

/CELLS=COUNT

/COUNT ROUND CELL

/METHOD=MC CIN(95) SAMPLES

(10000).

Resources Processor Time 00:01:06.862

Elapsed Time 00:01:06.923

Dimensions Requested 2

Cells Available 174762

Time for Exact Statistics 00:01:06.610

Page 1

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.149E2 a

112 .407 .402 b

.393 .412

Likelihood Ratio 119.093 112 .306 .275 b

.267 .284

a. 106 cells (77.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.545.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

a. 106 cells (77.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.545.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Fisher's Exact Test 110.556 .335 b .326 .344

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 2.386 1 .122 .122 .116 .129

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 106 cells (77.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.545.

Page 2

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .057 .067 .062 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 106 cells (77.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.545.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .082 .023 3.481

Designation Dependent .111 .030 3.520

P1A Standard score

Dependent .054 .029 1.797

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .047 .006

tau

P1A Standard score

Dependent .021 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .000

Designation Dependent .000

P1A Standard score

Dependent .072

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .409 c .393 d

tau

P1A Standard score

Dependent .415 c .417 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 3

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P1A Standard score

Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .384 .403

tau

P1A Standard score

Dependent .407 .427

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .497 .407 .402 a

.393 .412

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 95.349 a 105 .739 .766 b .758 .775

Likelihood Ratio 96.850 105 .702 .843 b

.836 .850

Fisher's Exact Test 89.053 .774 b .766 .782

Linear-by-Linear

Association 1.708 c 1 .191 .185 b .178 .193

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 106 cells (82.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.307.

Page 4

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .086 .098 .092 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 106 cells (82.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.307.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .071 .020 3.538

Designation Dependent .104 .028 3.647

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .038 .023 1.646

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .038 .007

tau

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .018 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 5

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .000

Designation Dependent .000

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .100

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .770 c .792 d

tau

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .792 c .738 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P1B Standard Score

Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .784 .800

tau

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .730 .747

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .463 .739 .766 a .758 .775

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 6

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 91.660 a

126 .991 .999 b

.999 1.000

Likelihood Ratio 83.731 126 .999 .999 b .999 1.000

Fisher's Exact Test 97.218 .998 b

.997 .999

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.302 1 .254 .252 .244 .261

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 120 cells (78.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.141.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .121 .134 .128 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 120 cells (78.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.141.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .051 .022 2.215

Designation Dependent .070 .031 2.242

P2ASC Dependent .031 .027 1.118

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .037 .005

tau

P2ASC Dependent .014 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 7

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .027

Designation Dependent .025

P2ASC Dependent .263

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .994 c 1.000 d

tau

P2ASC Dependent .997 c

.979 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P2ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .999 1.000

tau

P2ASC Dependent .976 .982

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .456 .991 .999 a .999 1.000

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 8

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.165E2 a

119 .547 .571 b

.561 .581

Likelihood Ratio 108.535 119 .744 .539 b

.529 .549

Fisher's Exact Test 117.226 .579 b .569 .589

Linear-by-Linear

Association .140 c 1 .709 .712 b .703 .721

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 116 cells (80.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.374.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .348 .367 .358 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 116 cells (80.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.374.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .076 .022 3.307

Designation Dependent .094 .032 2.861

P2BSC Dependent .057 .025 2.268

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .047 .006

tau

P2BSC Dependent .020 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 9

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .001

Designation Dependent .004

P2BSC Dependent .023

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .563 c .582 d

tau

P2BSC Dependent .546 c

.525 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P2BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .573 .592

tau

P2BSC Dependent .515 .534

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .500 .547 .571 a .561 .581

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 10

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.239E2 a

119 .361 .352 b

.343 .362

Likelihood Ratio 128.778 119 .255 .425 b

.415 .434

Fisher's Exact Test 110.737 .462 b .452 .472

Linear-by-Linear

Association 1.814 c 1 .178 .174 b .167 .182

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 134 cells (93.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.347.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .083 .094 .089 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 134 cells (93.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.347.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .089 .023 3.694

Designation Dependent .114 .033 3.323

P3ASC Dependent .064 .025 2.483

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .051 .008

tau

P3ASC Dependent .020 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 11

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .000

Designation Dependent .001

P3ASC Dependent .013

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .357 c .341 d

tau

P3ASC Dependent .458 c

.458 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P3ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .332 .350

tau

P3ASC Dependent .448 .468

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .511 .361 .352 a .343 .362

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 12

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.395E2 a

126 .194 .176 b

.168 .183

Likelihood Ratio 135.206 126 .272 .321 b

.312 .330

Fisher's Exact Test 123.012 .354 b .344 .363

Linear-by-Linear

Association .013 c 1 .910 .910 b .904 .916

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 135 cells (88.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.113.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .445 .465 .455 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 135 cells (88.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.113.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .087 .023 3.712

Designation Dependent .124 .033 3.575

P3BSC Dependent .050 .023 2.114

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .056 .007

tau

P3BSC Dependent .020 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 13

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .000

Designation Dependent .000

P3BSC Dependent .035

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .220 c .192 d

tau

P3BSC Dependent .481 c

.482 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P3BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .184 .200

tau

P3BSC Dependent .472 .491

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .534 .194 .176 a .168 .183

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 14

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.158E2 a

98 .106 .089 b

.084 .095

Likelihood Ratio 113.060 98 .142 .170 b

.163 .177

Fisher's Exact Test 99.402 .170 b .163 .177

Linear-by-Linear

Association 2.202 c 1 .138 .134 b .127 .140

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 86 cells (71.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.484.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .065 .075 .070 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 86 cells (71.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.484.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .091 .028 3.151

Designation Dependent .107 .034 3.009

P4ASC Dependent .074 .033 2.151

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .047 .007

tau

P4ASC Dependent .023 .006

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 15

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .002

Designation Dependent .003

P4ASC Dependent .031

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .104 c .086 d

tau

P4ASC Dependent .123 c

.177 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P4ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .081 .092

tau

P4ASC Dependent .169 .184

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .499 .106 .089 a .084 .095

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 16

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 89.147 a

105 .866 .911 b

.905 .916

Likelihood Ratio 92.399 105 .805 .826 b .818 .833

Fisher's Exact Test 94.877 .691 b

.682 .700

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .329 1 .566 .573 .564 .583

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 94 cells (73.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.573.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .280 .298 .289 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 94 cells (73.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.573.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .075 .026 2.839

Designation Dependent .084 .033 2.485

P4BSC Dependent .067 .030 2.171

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .037 .006

tau

P4BSC Dependent .020 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 17

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .005

Designation Dependent .013

P4BSC Dependent .030

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .837 c .880 d

tau

P4BSC Dependent .442 c

.447 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P4BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .874 .887

tau

P4BSC Dependent .438 .457

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .451 .866 .911 a .905 .916

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Designation * P5ASC

Page 18

Crosstab

Count

P5ASC

… … … … …

Designation DGM 0 0 1 4 4

AGM 0 0 2 1 6

Sr Manager 0 1 2 4 10

Jr Manager 0 1 0 1 5

Manager 0 2 0 2 3

Asst Manager 0 1 3 5 3

Officer 1 1 2 2 6

Asst Executive 1 1 3 3 4

Total 2 7 13 22 41

Crosstab

Count

P5ASC

… 50 … … …

Designation DGM 6 5 10 6 2

AGM 5 3 3 4 5

Sr Manager 6 5 7 5 3

Jr Manager 3 3 7 4 3

Manager 9 10 6 6 3

Asst Manager 6 6 5 4 3

Officer 3 8 8 10 5

Asst Executive 7 6 9 7 3

Total 45 46 55 46 27

Crosstab

Count

P5ASC

… … … 75 … Total

Designation DGM 2 1 0 0 0 41

AGM 2 4 1 0 0 36

Sr Manager 2 2 1 0 0 48

Jr Manager 4 2 0 0 0 33

Manager 3 1 1 0 2 48

Asst Manager 1 1 2 1 0 41

Officer 3 0 2 1 0 52

Asst Executive 2 3 1 1 0 51

Total 19 14 8 3 2 350

Page 19

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 76.510 a

98 .947 .967 b

.963 .970

Likelihood Ratio 77.512 98 .937 .988 b .985 .990

Fisher's Exact Test 68.530 .988 b

.985 .990

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .027 1 .869 .863 .856 .870

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 90 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .19.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .165.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .423 .442 .432 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 90 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .19.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .165.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .066 .025 2.568

Designation Dependent .087 .033 2.525

P5ASC Dependent .044 .028 1.548

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .031 .006

tau

P5ASC Dependent .014 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 20

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .010

Designation Dependent .012

P5ASC Dependent .122

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .945 c .960 d

tau

P5ASC Dependent .984 c

.960 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P5ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .957 .964

tau

P5ASC Dependent .956 .964

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .424 .947 .967 a .963 .970

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 21

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 77.573 a

84 .676 .689 b

.680 .698

Likelihood Ratio 83.586 84 .492 .764 b .755 .772

Fisher's Exact Test 69.133 .770 b

.762 .778

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .111 1 .739 .736 .727 .744

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 76 cells (73.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.333.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .355 .374 .364 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 76 cells (73.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.333.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .062 .025 2.434

Designation Dependent .074 .034 2.111

P5BSC Dependent .050 .028 1.717

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .030 .006

tau

P5BSC Dependent .017 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 22

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .015

Designation Dependent .035

P5BSC Dependent .086

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .774 c .783 d

tau

P5BSC Dependent .829 c

.795 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P5BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .775 .791

tau

P5BSC Dependent .787 .803

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .426 .676 .689 a .680 .698

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 23

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.517E2 a

133 .128 .107 b

.101 .113

Likelihood Ratio 156.237 133 .082 .067 b

.062 .072

Fisher's Exact Test 144.123 .065 b .060 .070

Linear-by-Linear

Association .124 c 1 .725 .731 b .722 .739

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 144 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .352.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .354 .373 .364 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 144 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .352.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .088 .024 3.518

Designation Dependent .131 .031 4.009

P6ASC Dependent .046 .030 1.497

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .065 .009

tau

P6ASC Dependent .024 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 24

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .000

Designation Dependent .000

P6ASC Dependent .134

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .066 c .041 d

tau

P6ASC Dependent .060 c

.105 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P6ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .037 .045

tau

P6ASC Dependent .099 .111

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .550 .128 .107 a .101 .113

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 25

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.151E2 a

119 .585 .597 b

.588 .607

Likelihood Ratio 119.564 119 .468 .602 b

.592 .611

Fisher's Exact Test 107.140 .660 b .651 .669

Linear-by-Linear

Association .107 c 1 .744 .749 b .740 .757

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 129 cells (89.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.327.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .367 .385 .376 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 129 cells (89.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.327.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .065 .023 2.810

Designation Dependent .101 .032 3.009

P6BSC Dependent .030 .027 1.101

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .046 .007

tau

P6BSC Dependent .018 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 26

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .005

Designation Dependent .003

P6BSC Dependent .271

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .660 c .678 d

tau

P6BSC Dependent .808 c

.762 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P6BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .669 .687

tau

P6BSC Dependent .753 .770

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .497 .585 .597 a .588 .607

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 27

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.254E2 a

112 .183 .152 b

.145 .159

Likelihood Ratio 115.067 112 .402 .308 b

.299 .317

Fisher's Exact Test 108.066 .430 b .421 .440

Linear-by-Linear

Association .408 c 1 .523 .522 b .512 .531

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 108 cells (79.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.639.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .248 .265 .257 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 108 cells (79.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.639.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .056 .023 2.370

Designation Dependent .087 .030 2.836

P7BSC Dependent .024 .030 .809

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .050 .006

tau

P7BSC Dependent .018 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 28

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .018

Designation Dependent .005

P7BSC Dependent .418

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .241 c .206 d

tau

P7BSC Dependent .774 c

.701 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P7BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .198 .214

tau

P7BSC Dependent .692 .710

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .514 .183 .152 a .145 .159

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 29

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 96.697 a

112 .848 .883 b

.877 .889

Likelihood Ratio 95.585 112 .867 .952 b .948 .956

Fisher's Exact Test 89.030 .920 b

.914 .925

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .250 1 .617 .612 .602 .621

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 112 cells (82.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.500.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .294 .312 .303 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 112 cells (82.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.500.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .069 .024 2.883

Designation Dependent .104 .033 3.007

P7ASC Dependent .034 .026 1.316

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .040 .007

tau

P7ASC Dependent .017 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 30

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .004

Designation Dependent .003

P7ASC Dependent .188

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .833 c .860 d

tau

P7ASC Dependent .889 c

.827 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P7ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .853 .867

tau

P7ASC Dependent .820 .835

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .465 .848 .883 a .877 .889

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 31

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.067E2 a

105 .434 .436 b

.426 .445

Likelihood Ratio 114.702 105 .243 .380 b

.370 .390

Fisher's Exact Test 101.953 .302 b .293 .311

Linear-by-Linear

Association .384 c 1 .535 .530 b .520 .540

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 102 cells (79.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .620.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .253 .270 .262 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 102 cells (79.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .620.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .078 .024 3.175

Designation Dependent .104 .036 2.781

P8ASC Dependent .051 .023 2.157

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .043 .007

tau

P8ASC Dependent .023 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 32

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .002

Designation Dependent .005

P8ASC Dependent .031

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .497 c .506 d

tau

P8ASC Dependent .180 c

.219 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P8ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .496 .515

tau

P8ASC Dependent .211 .228

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .483 .434 .436 a .426 .445

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 33

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 88.152 a

98 .752 .788 b

.780 .796

Likelihood Ratio 91.990 98 .652 .773 b .765 .781

Fisher's Exact Test 86.379 .729 b

.720 .737

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .274 1 .601 .607 .597 .616

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 92 cells (76.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .523.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .301 .319 .310 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 92 cells (76.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .523.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .066 .024 2.700

Designation Dependent .081 .032 2.471

P8BSC Dependent .051 .029 1.740

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .035 .006

tau

P8BSC Dependent .019 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 34

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .007

Designation Dependent .013

P8BSC Dependent .082

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .786 c .818 d

tau

P8BSC Dependent .677 c

.632 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P8BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .811 .826

tau

P8BSC Dependent .622 .641

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .449 .752 .788 a .780 .796

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 35

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.479E2 a

133 .178 .165 b

.157 .172

Likelihood Ratio 150.760 133 .139 .235 b

.227 .243

Fisher's Exact Test 130.585 .198 b .190 .205

Linear-by-Linear

Association 1.171 c 1 .279 .269 b .260 .277

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 145 cells (90.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.082.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .129 .143 .136 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 145 cells (90.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.082.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .086 .024 3.458

Designation Dependent .124 .035 3.391

P9ASC Dependent .047 .023 1.991

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .059 .008

tau

P9ASC Dependent .024 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 36

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .001

Designation Dependent .001

P9ASC Dependent .046

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .239 c .214 d

tau

P9ASC Dependent .071 c

.125 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P9ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .205 .222

tau

P9ASC Dependent .119 .131

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .545 .178 .165 a .157 .172

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 37

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.188E2 a

140 .902 .945 b

.940 .949

Likelihood Ratio 123.327 140 .841 .891 b

.885 .897

Fisher's Exact Test 116.728 .911 b .906 .917

Linear-by-Linear

Association 6.729 c 1 .009 .009 b .007 .011

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 148 cells (88.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 2.594.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .004 .007 .005 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 148 cells (88.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 2.594.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .071 .025 2.813

Designation Dependent .097 .034 2.758

P9BSC Dependent .044 .027 1.594

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .048 .006

tau

P9BSC Dependent .017 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 38

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .005

Designation Dependent .006

P9BSC Dependent .111

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .910 c .943 d

tau

P9BSC Dependent .899 c

.816 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P9BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .939 .948

tau

P9BSC Dependent .808 .824

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .503 .902 .945 a .940 .949

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 39

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.230E2 a

98 .045 .028 b

.025 .031

Likelihood Ratio 116.835 98 .094 .050 b

.045 .054

Fisher's Exact Test 115.694 .027 b .024 .030

Linear-by-Linear

Association .028 c 1 .868 .874 b .867 .880

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 90 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .167.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .430 .449 .440 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 90 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .167.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .097 .024 3.845

Designation Dependent .128 .033 3.659

P10ASC Dependent .065 .030 2.099

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .050 .008

tau

P10ASC Dependent .029 .006

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 40

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .000

Designation Dependent .000

P10ASC Dependent .036

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .050 c .026 d

tau

P10ASC Dependent .002 c

.015 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P10ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .023 .029

tau

P10ASC Dependent .013 .018

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .510 .045 .028 a .025 .031

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 41

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 78.115 a

91 .830 .864 b

.857 .870

Likelihood Ratio 84.518 91 .671 .812 b .804 .819

Fisher's Exact Test 77.268 .744 b

.736 .753

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .176 1 .675 .680 .671 .689

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 78 cells (69.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.420.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .330 .348 .339 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 78 cells (69.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.420.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .069 .026 2.562

Designation Dependent .074 .032 2.215

P10BSC Dependent .065 .032 1.981

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .031 .006

tau

P10BSC Dependent .020 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 42

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .010

Designation Dependent .027

P10BSC Dependent .048

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .855 c .878 d

tau

P10BSC Dependent .512 c

.496 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P10BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .872 .885

tau

P10BSC Dependent .487 .506

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .427 .830 .864 a .857 .870

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 43

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.093E2 a

119 .728 .764 b

.756 .772

Likelihood Ratio 111.935 119 .664 .724 b

.715 .733

Fisher's Exact Test 102.295 .807 b .799 .814

Linear-by-Linear

Association .025 c 1 .873 .873 b .867 .880

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 130 cells (90.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.159.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .425 .444 .434 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 130 cells (90.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.159.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .047 .024 1.924

Designation Dependent .074 .036 1.971

P11ASC Dependent .020 .025 .775

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .044 .006

tau

P11ASC Dependent .016 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 44

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .054

Designation Dependent .049

P11ASC Dependent .438

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .771 c .805 d

tau

P11ASC Dependent .965 c

.927 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P11ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .797 .813

tau

P11ASC Dependent .922 .932

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .488 .728 .764 a .756 .772

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 45

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 1.241E2 a

126 .531 .546 b

.536 .556

Likelihood Ratio 127.163 126 .454 .602 b

.593 .612

Fisher's Exact Test 110.287 .640 b .631 .650

Linear-by-Linear

Association .175 c 1 .675 .674 b .665 .684

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 140 cells (92.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .419.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .333 .351 .342 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 140 cells (92.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected

count is .09.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .419.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .075 .023 3.172

Designation Dependent .117 .032 3.509

P11BSC Dependent .033 .027 1.234

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .051 .007

tau

P11BSC Dependent .019 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 46

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .002

Designation Dependent .000

P11BSC Dependent .217

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .535 c .542 d

tau

P11BSC Dependent .648 c

.613 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Designation Dependent

P11BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Designation Dependent .532 .552

tau

P11BSC Dependent .603 .622

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .512 .531 .546 a .536 .556

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 47

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 20.248 a

16 .209 .188 b

.180 .195

Likelihood Ratio 22.266 16 .135 .204 b .196 .211

Fisher's Exact Test 19.420 .200 b

.192 .208

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 8.363 1 .004 .004 .003 .005

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 15 cells (44.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -2.892.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .001 .003 .002 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 15 cells (44.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -2.892.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .033 .023 1.404

Division Dependent .083 .043 1.869

P1A Standard score

Dependent .010 .027 .372

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .058 .021

tau

P1A Standard score

Dependent .003 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 48

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .160

Division Dependent .062

P1A Standard score

Dependent .710

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .212 c .189 d

tau

P1A Standard score

Dependent .436 c .417 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P1A Standard score

Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .181 .196

tau

P1A Standard score

Dependent .408 .427

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .234 .209 .188 a .180 .195

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 49

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 9.737 a

15 .836 .864 b

.857 .871

Likelihood Ratio 12.127 15 .669 .784 b .776 .792

Fisher's Exact Test 8.978 .905 b

.899 .911

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .144 1 .705 .692 .683 .701

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 12 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.379.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .343 .361 .352 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 12 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.379.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. T

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .000 .000 .b

Division Dependent .000 .000 .b

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .000 .000 .b

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .028 .013

tau

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .001 .001

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 50

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .b

Division Dependent .b

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .b

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .838 c .865 d

tau

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .956 c .910 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P1B Standard Score

Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .858 .872

tau

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .904 .915

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .165 .836 .864 a .857 .871

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 51

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 17.820 a

18 .468 .479 b

.469 .489

Likelihood Ratio 20.628 18 .299 .488 b .478 .498

Fisher's Exact Test 16.856 .508 b

.498 .518

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 2.100 1 .147 .161 .154 .168

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 20 cells (52.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.449.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .075 .085 .080 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 20 cells (52.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.449.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .023 .027 .858

Division Dependent .015 .052 .289

P2ASC Dependent .027 .021 1.268

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .051 .019

tau

P2ASC Dependent .004 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 52

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .391

Division Dependent .773

P2ASC Dependent .205

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .471 c .481 d

tau

P2ASC Dependent .088 c

.156 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P2ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .471 .491

tau

P2ASC Dependent .149 .163

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .220 .468 .479 a .469 .489

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 53

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 17.075 a

17 .449 .453 b

.443 .463

Likelihood Ratio 19.535 17 .299 .440 b .430 .450

Fisher's Exact Test 16.601 .454 b

.444 .464

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .092 1 .762 .773 .765 .781

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 16 cells (44.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.303.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .380 .399 .390 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 16 cells (44.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.303.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .016 .015 1.095

Division Dependent .053 .047 1.095

P2BSC Dependent .000 .000 c

.

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .049 .017

tau

P2BSC Dependent .002 .001

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 54

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .273

Division Dependent .273

P2BSC Dependent .c

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .453 d .456 e

tau

P2BSC Dependent .852 d

.764 e

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P2BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .446 .465

tau

P2BSC Dependent .756 .773

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .216 .449 .453 a .443 .463

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 55

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 16.323 a

17 .501 .511 b

.501 .521

Likelihood Ratio 17.520 17 .420 .531 b .521 .541

Fisher's Exact Test 15.853 .522 b

.512 .531

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .123 1 .725 .728 .719 .737

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 10 cells (27.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.351.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .348 .367 .358 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 10 cells (27.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.351.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .029 .029 .996

Division Dependent .053 .051 1.023

P3ASC Dependent .019 .029 .663

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .047 .021

tau

P3ASC Dependent .003 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 56

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .319

Division Dependent .307

P3ASC Dependent .507

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .504 c .512 d

tau

P3ASC Dependent .272 c

.287 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P3ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .502 .521

tau

P3ASC Dependent .278 .296

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .211 .501 .511 a .501 .521

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 57

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 16.832 a

18 .535 .551 b

.541 .561

Likelihood Ratio 18.326 18 .434 .580 b .570 .590

Fisher's Exact Test 16.572 .545 b

.535 .555

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .102 1 .749 .745 .737 .754

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 16 cells (42.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .319.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .363 .382 .372 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 16 cells (42.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .319.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .012 .021 .549

Division Dependent .030 .041 .731

P3BSC Dependent .003 .024 .137

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .048 .019

tau

P3BSC Dependent .003 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 58

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .583

Division Dependent .465

P3BSC Dependent .891

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .538 c .553 d

tau

P3BSC Dependent .535 c

.503 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P3BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .543 .563

tau

P3BSC Dependent .493 .513

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .214 .535 .551 a .541 .561

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 59

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 15.062 a

14 .374 .373 b

.363 .382

Likelihood Ratio 15.794 14 .326 .442 b .433 .452

Fisher's Exact Test 15.058 .343 b

.334 .353

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.384 1 .239 .239 .230 .247

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 13 cells (43.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.176.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .116 .129 .122 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 13 cells (43.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.176.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .016 .018 .897

Division Dependent .045 .036 1.227

P4ASC Dependent .003 .020 .164

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .043 .018

tau

P4ASC Dependent .002 .001

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 60

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .370

Division Dependent .220

P4ASC Dependent .869

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .377 c .375 d

tau

P4ASC Dependent .871 c

.786 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P4ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .365 .384

tau

P4ASC Dependent .778 .794

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .203 .374 .373 a .363 .382

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 61

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 18.885 a

15 .219 .191 b

.183 .199

Likelihood Ratio 20.957 15 .138 .202 b .194 .210

Fisher's Exact Test 17.958 .216 b

.208 .224

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .425 1 .514 .515 .505 .525

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 14 cells (43.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .652.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .245 .262 .253 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 14 cells (43.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .652.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .032 .021 1.515

Division Dependent .061 .033 1.797

P4BSC Dependent .020 .027 .739

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .054 .018

tau

P4BSC Dependent .003 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 62

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .130

Division Dependent .072

P4BSC Dependent .460

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .221 c .192 d

tau

P4BSC Dependent .578 c

.523 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P4BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .184 .200

tau

P4BSC Dependent .513 .533

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .226 .219 .191 a .183 .199

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 63

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 4.473 a

14 .992 .994 b

.993 .996

Likelihood Ratio 4.465 14 .992 .996 b .994 .997

Fisher's Exact Test 5.261 .991 b

.989 .993

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .000 1 .999 .991 .989 .992

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 11 cells (36.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .75.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .001.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .492 .512 .502 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 11 cells (36.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .75.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .001.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .002 .015 .153

Division Dependent .008 .013 .578

P5ASC Dependent .000 .021 .000

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .013 .012

tau

P5ASC Dependent .001 .001

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 64

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .879

Division Dependent .564

P5ASC Dependent 1.000

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .992 c .994 d

tau

P5ASC Dependent .995 c

.985 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P5ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .993 .996

tau

P5ASC Dependent .983 .988

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .112 .992 .994 a .993 .996

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 65

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 11.471 a

12 .489 .495 b

.486 .505

Likelihood Ratio 11.642 12 .475 .526 b .516 .536

Fisher's Exact Test 11.338 .496 b

.486 .505

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 3.983 1 .046 .047 .042 .051

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 6 cells (23.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.51.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.996.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .021 .027 .024 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 6 cells (23.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is 1.51.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.996.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .018 .025 .737

Division Dependent .023 .031 .728

P5BSC Dependent .017 .033 .498

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .033 .019

tau

P5BSC Dependent .003 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 66

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .461

Division Dependent .467

P5BSC Dependent .619

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .492 c .497 d

tau

P5BSC Dependent .420 c

.405 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P5BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .488 .507

tau

P5BSC Dependent .395 .414

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .178 .489 .495 a .486 .505

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 67

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 20.407 a

19 .370 .360 b

.350 .369

Likelihood Ratio 23.250 19 .227 .331 b .322 .340

Fisher's Exact Test 19.084 .419 b

.410 .429

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .039 1 .843 .843 .835 .850

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 16 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .198.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .406 .425 .416 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 16 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .198.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .011 .032 .353

Division Dependent .038 .063 .585

P6ASC Dependent .000 .031 .000

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .058 .021

tau

P6ASC Dependent .004 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 68

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .724

Division Dependent .558

P6ASC Dependent 1.000

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .374 c .361 d

tau

P6ASC Dependent .149 c

.185 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P6ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .352 .371

tau

P6ASC Dependent .178 .193

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .235 .370 .360 a .350 .369

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 69

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 15.053 a

17 .592 .616 b

.607 .626

Likelihood Ratio 16.901 17 .461 .590 b .580 .599

Fisher's Exact Test 14.601 .630 b

.621 .639

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.588 1 .208 .212 .204 .220

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 12 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.260.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .100 .112 .106 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 12 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.260.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .021 .018 1.155

Division Dependent .045 .039 1.136

P6BSC Dependent .010 .019 .522

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .043 .019

tau

P6BSC Dependent .002 .001

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 70

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .248

Division Dependent .256

P6BSC Dependent .601

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .595 c .618 d

tau

P6BSC Dependent .704 c

.653 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P6BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .608 .627

tau

P6BSC Dependent .643 .662

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .203 .592 .616 a .607 .626

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 71

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 24.680 a

16 .076 .053 b

.049 .057

Likelihood Ratio 28.319 16 .029 .047 b .042 .051

Fisher's Exact Test 23.927 .054 b

.050 .059

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.157 1 .282 .282 .274 .291

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 16 cells (47.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.076.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .136 .150 .143 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 16 cells (47.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.076.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .031 .016 1.866

Division Dependent .053 .022 2.352

P7BSC Dependent .021 .022 .950

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .071 .019

tau

P7BSC Dependent .004 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 72

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .062

Division Dependent .019

P7BSC Dependent .342

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .077 c .054 d

tau

P7BSC Dependent .123 c

.176 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P7BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .049 .058

tau

P7BSC Dependent .168 .183

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .257 .076 .053 a .049 .057

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 73

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 21.453 a

16 .162 .146 b

.139 .153

Likelihood Ratio 24.251 16 .084 .138 b .131 .145

Fisher's Exact Test 21.530 .121 b

.115 .128

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .056 1 .814 .802 .794 .810

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 15 cells (44.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .236.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .391 .410 .400 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 15 cells (44.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .236.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .026 .028 .928

Division Dependent .061 .049 1.209

P7ASC Dependent .010 .023 .438

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .061 .021

tau

P7ASC Dependent .005 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 74

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .354

Division Dependent .227

P7ASC Dependent .662

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .164 c .146 d

tau

P7ASC Dependent .068 c

.114 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P7ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .140 .153

tau

P7ASC Dependent .108 .120

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .240 .162 .146 a .139 .153

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 75

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 22.195 a

15 .103 .086 b

.080 .091

Likelihood Ratio 26.236 15 .036 .055 b .051 .060

Fisher's Exact Test 20.767 .114 b

.107 .120

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .230 1 .631 .617 .608 .627

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 10 cells (31.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .480.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .301 .319 .310 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 10 cells (31.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .480.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .019 .021 .864

Division Dependent .053 .034 1.533

P8ASC Dependent .003 .027 .124

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .063 .019

tau

P8ASC Dependent .003 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 76

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .388

Division Dependent .125

P8ASC Dependent .901

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .104 c .086 d

tau

P8ASC Dependent .434 c

.416 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P8ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .080 .091

tau

P8ASC Dependent .407 .426

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .244 .103 .086 a .080 .091

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 77

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 9.748 a

14 .780 .804 b

.796 .812

Likelihood Ratio 10.282 14 .741 .829 b .821 .836

Fisher's Exact Test 9.963 .780 b

.772 .789

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .001 1 .969 .980 .978 .983

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 10 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.038.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .482 .501 .492 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 10 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.038.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .007 .012 .578

Division Dependent .023 .039 .578

P8BSC Dependent .000 .000 c

.

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .028 .016

tau

P8BSC Dependent .002 .001

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 78

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .564

Division Dependent .564

P8BSC Dependent .c

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .782 d .805 e

tau

P8BSC Dependent .882 d

.814 e

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P8BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .797 .813

tau

P8BSC Dependent .806 .822

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .165 .780 .804 a .796 .812

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 79

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 19.047 a

19 .454 .463 b

.453 .472

Likelihood Ratio 23.745 19 .206 .310 b .301 .320

Fisher's Exact Test 18.100 .502 b

.493 .512

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 12.304 1 .000 .001 .000 .001

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 18 cells (45.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 3.508.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .000 .001 .000 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 18 cells (45.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 3.508.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .012 .010 1.215

Division Dependent .038 .031 1.215

P9ASC Dependent .000 .000 c

.

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .054 .016

tau

P9ASC Dependent .001 .001

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 80

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .224

Division Dependent .224

P9ASC Dependent .c

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .457 d .464 e

tau

P9ASC Dependent .956 d

.907 e

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P9ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .454 .474

tau

P9ASC Dependent .901 .913

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .227 .454 .463 a .453 .472

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 81

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 20.500 a

20 .427 .433 b

.423 .442

Likelihood Ratio 23.063 20 .286 .461 b .451 .471

Fisher's Exact Test 20.210 .401 b

.392 .411

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .259 1 .611 .626 .617 .636

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 21 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.509.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .310 .328 .319 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 21 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.509.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .016 .019 .856

Division Dependent .038 .017 2.252

P9BSC Dependent .007 .026 .254

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .059 .017

tau

P9BSC Dependent .002 .001

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 82

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .392

Division Dependent .024

P9BSC Dependent .799

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .431 c .434 d

tau

P9BSC Dependent .778 c

.689 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P9BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .424 .444

tau

P9BSC Dependent .680 .698

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .235 .427 .433 a .423 .442

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 83

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 15.959 a

14 .316 .298 b

.289 .307

Likelihood Ratio 17.882 14 .212 .291 b .282 .300

Fisher's Exact Test 14.820 .350 b

.340 .359

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.677 1 .195 .208 .200 .216

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 10 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.295.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .105 .117 .111 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 10 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.295.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .017 .020 .809

Division Dependent .030 .015 2.012

P10ASC Dependent .010 .029 .356

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .046 .016

tau

P10ASC Dependent .002 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 84

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .418

Division Dependent .044

P10ASC Dependent .722

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .319 c .299 d

tau

P10ASC Dependent .677 c

.602 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P10ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .290 .308

tau

P10ASC Dependent .593 .612

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .209 .316 .298 a .289 .307

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 85

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 18.988 a

13 .123 .110 b

.104 .117

Likelihood Ratio 21.388 13 .066 .098 b .093 .104

Fisher's Exact Test 19.662 .081 b

.075 .086

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .238 1 .626 .635 .625 .644

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 10 cells (35.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .488.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .305 .323 .314 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 10 cells (35.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .488.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .012 .024 .493

Division Dependent .038 .041 .899

P10BSC Dependent .000 .029 .000

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .054 .019

tau

P10BSC Dependent .003 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 86

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .622

Division Dependent .369

P10BSC Dependent 1.000

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .125 c .111 d

tau

P10BSC Dependent .344 c

.344 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P10BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .105 .117

tau

P10BSC Dependent .335 .354

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .227 .123 .110 a .104 .117

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 87

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 14.852 a

17 .606 .634 b

.625 .644

Likelihood Ratio 15.621 17 .551 .712 b .703 .721

Fisher's Exact Test 15.280 .570 b

.560 .579

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .011 1 .916 .933 .928 .938

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 15 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .105.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .458 .478 .468 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 15 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .105.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .012 .014 .801

Division Dependent .038 .046 .801

P11ASC Dependent .000 .000 c

.

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .042 .019

tau

P11ASC Dependent .003 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 88

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .423

Division Dependent .423

P11ASC Dependent .c

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .609 d .636 e

tau

P11ASC Dependent .497 d

.465 e

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P11ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .626 .645

tau

P11ASC Dependent .456 .475

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .202 .606 .634 a .625 .644

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 89

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 15.742 a

18 .611 .640 b

.630 .649

Likelihood Ratio 16.953 18 .526 .691 b .682 .700

Fisher's Exact Test 15.455 .632 b

.623 .642

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.671 1 .196 .206 .198 .214

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 16 cells (42.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.293.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .101 .113 .107 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 16 cells (42.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .38.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.293.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .014 .009 1.505

Division Dependent .045 .030 1.505

P11BSC Dependent .000 .000 .c

tau

P11BSC Dependent .002 .001

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 90

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .132

Division Dependent .132

P11BSC Dependent .c

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .614 d .641 e

tau

P11BSC Dependent .784 d

.721 e

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Division Dependent

P11BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Division Dependent .632 .651

tau

P11BSC Dependent .712 .730

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .207 .611 .640 a .630 .649

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 91

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 61.981 a

64 .548 .567 b

.557 .577

Likelihood Ratio 64.428 64 .462 .558 b .549 .568

Fisher's Exact Test 60.733 .474 b

.464 .484

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .141 1 .708 .697 .688 .706

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 53 cells (62.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .375.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .338 .357 .347 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 53 cells (62.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .375.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .050 .020 2.497

Education Dependent .052 .030 1.729

P1A Standard score

Dependent .047 .022 2.124

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .045 .009

tau

P1A Standard score

Dependent .013 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 92

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .013

Education Dependent .084

P1A Standard score

Dependent .034

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .516 c .523 d

tau

P1A Standard score

Dependent .234 c .282 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P1A Standard score

Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .513 .533

tau

P1A Standard score

Dependent .273 .291

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .388 .548 .567 a .557 .577

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 93

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 81.471 a

60 .034 .027 b

.024 .030

Likelihood Ratio 85.589 60 .017 .028 b .025 .031

Fisher's Exact Test 73.619 .026 b

.023 .029

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .216 1 .642 .646 .636 .655

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 52 cells (65.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .465.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .315 .334 .324 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 52 cells (65.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .465.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .057 .029 1.914

Education Dependent .077 .040 1.829

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .041 .030 1.345

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .056 .011

tau

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .016 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 94

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .056

Education Dependent .067

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .179

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .054 c .043 d

tau

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .022 c .056 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P1B Standard Score

Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .039 .047

tau

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .052 .061

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .435 .034 .027 a .024 .030

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 95

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 79.084 a

72 .265 .234 b

.226 .242

Likelihood Ratio 83.772 72 .162 .148 b .141 .155

Fisher's Exact Test 75.986 .156 b

.149 .164

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.164 1 .281 .278 .270 .287

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 64 cells (67.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.079.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .137 .151 .144 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 64 cells (67.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.079.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .052 .022 2.288

Education Dependent .048 .039 1.227

P2ASC Dependent .054 .025 2.152

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .056 .009

tau

P2ASC Dependent .015 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 96

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .022

Education Dependent .220

P2ASC Dependent .031

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .289 c .256 d

tau

P2ASC Dependent .044 c

.108 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P2ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .248 .265

tau

P2ASC Dependent .102 .114

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .429 .265 .234 a .226 .242

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 97

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 62.209 a

68 .675 .735 b

.726 .743

Likelihood Ratio 61.837 68 .687 .684 b .675 .693

Fisher's Exact Test 61.176 .723 b

.714 .731

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .453 1 .501 .515 .505 .524

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 58 cells (64.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .673.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .246 .263 .254 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 58 cells (64.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .673.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .033 .017 1.929

Education Dependent .036 .021 1.740

P2BSC Dependent .030 .026 1.155

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .045 .008

tau

P2BSC Dependent .010 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 98

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .054

Education Dependent .082

P2BSC Dependent .248

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .664 c .713 d

tau

P2BSC Dependent .808 c

.731 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P2BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .704 .721

tau

P2BSC Dependent .723 .740

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .388 .675 .735 a .726 .743

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 99

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 77.352 a

68 .205 .192 b

.184 .199

Likelihood Ratio 81.383 68 .128 .225 b .216 .233

Fisher's Exact Test 70.067 .251 b

.242 .259

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .122 1 .727 .715 .706 .724

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 59 cells (65.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .349.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .351 .370 .361 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 59 cells (65.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .349.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .055 .025 2.191

Education Dependent .073 .039 1.808

P3ASC Dependent .042 .021 1.948

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .055 .010

tau

P3ASC Dependent .012 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 100

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .028

Education Dependent .071

P3ASC Dependent .051

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .207 c .196 d

tau

P3ASC Dependent .303 c

.329 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P3ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .188 .203

tau

P3ASC Dependent .320 .338

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .425 .205 .192 a .184 .199

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 101

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 72.677 a

72 .456 .456 b

.447 .466

Likelihood Ratio 72.617 72 .457 .583 b .574 .593

Fisher's Exact Test 64.877 .639 b

.630 .649

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 4.068 1 .044 .041 .037 .045

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 64 cells (67.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -2.017.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .018 .023 .020 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 64 cells (67.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -2.017.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .038 .023 1.631

Education Dependent .065 .040 1.574

P3BSC Dependent .017 .021 .801

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .053 .010

tau

P3BSC Dependent .011 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 102

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .103

Education Dependent .115

P3BSC Dependent .423

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .427 c .419 d

tau

P3BSC Dependent .554 c

.528 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P3BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .410 .429

tau

P3BSC Dependent .518 .537

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .415 .456 .456 a .447 .466

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 103

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 55.027 a

56 .512 .519 b

.510 .529

Likelihood Ratio 56.300 56 .464 .620 b .611 .630

Fisher's Exact Test 49.386 .616 b

.606 .625

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .120 1 .729 .735 .726 .743

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 44 cells (58.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .346.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .359 .378 .369 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 44 cells (58.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .346.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .049 .023 2.102

Education Dependent .052 .030 1.729

P4ASC Dependent .047 .030 1.551

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .041 .009

tau

P4ASC Dependent .011 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 104

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .036

Education Dependent .084

P4ASC Dependent .121

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .451 c .452 d

tau

P4ASC Dependent .637 c

.587 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P4ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .442 .462

tau

P4ASC Dependent .577 .596

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .369 .512 .519 a .510 .529

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 105

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 45.965 a

60 .909 .948 b

.943 .952

Likelihood Ratio 48.328 60 .860 .939 b .934 .944

Fisher's Exact Test 46.031 .925 b

.920 .930

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .160 1 .689 .691 .682 .700

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 47 cells (58.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.400.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .331 .349 .340 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 47 cells (58.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.400.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .031 .015 2.059

Education Dependent .032 .018 1.797

P4BSC Dependent .030 .023 1.289

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .033 .007

tau

P4BSC Dependent .008 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 106

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .040

Education Dependent .072

P4BSC Dependent .197

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .917 c .951 d

tau

P4BSC Dependent .970 c

.924 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P4BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .946 .955

tau

P4BSC Dependent .918 .929

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .341 .909 .948 a .943 .952

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 107

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 58.138 a

56 .397 .406 b

.397 .416

Likelihood Ratio 66.923 56 .151 .270 b .261 .278

Fisher's Exact Test 57.087 .266 b

.257 .275

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .325 1 .569 .564 .554 .573

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 45 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .31.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .570.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .274 .291 .282 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 45 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .31.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .570.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .050 .021 2.291

Education Dependent .056 .028 1.952

P5ASC Dependent .044 .026 1.644

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .045 .009

tau

P5ASC Dependent .013 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 108

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .022

Education Dependent .051

P5ASC Dependent .100

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .263 c .254 d

tau

P5ASC Dependent .233 c

.267 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P5ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .246 .263

tau

P5ASC Dependent .258 .275

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .377 .397 .406 a .397 .416

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 109

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 33.259 a

48 .948 .959 b

.955 .963

Likelihood Ratio 37.858 48 .853 .945 b .940 .949

Fisher's Exact Test 33.813 .935 b

.931 .940

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .387 1 .534 .526 .516 .536

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 30 cells (46.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .63.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .622.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .253 .270 .262 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 30 cells (46.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .63.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .622.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .025 .021 1.186

Education Dependent .028 .024 1.153

P5BSC Dependent .023 .033 .690

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .024 .007

tau

P5BSC Dependent .008 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 110

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .236

Education Dependent .249

P5BSC Dependent .490

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .948 c .954 d

tau

P5BSC Dependent .945 c

.923 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P5BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .950 .958

tau

P5BSC Dependent .918 .928

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .295 .948 .959 a .955 .963

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 111

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 68.838 a

76 .707 .743 b

.735 .752

Likelihood Ratio 71.822 76 .614 .725 b .717 .734

Fisher's Exact Test 64.811 .796 b

.789 .804

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .732 1 .392 .393 .383 .403

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 70 cells (70.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .856.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .192 .207 .199 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 70 cells (70.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .856.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .038 .021 1.816

Education Dependent .060 .033 1.763

P6ASC Dependent .020 .021 .927

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .050 .009

tau

P6ASC Dependent .009 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 112

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .069

Education Dependent .078

P6ASC Dependent .354

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .681 c .707 d

tau

P6ASC Dependent .889 c

.836 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P6ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .698 .716

tau

P6ASC Dependent .828 .843

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .405 .707 .743 a .735 .752

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 113

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 65.426 a

68 .566 .576 b

.566 .585

Likelihood Ratio 66.261 68 .537 .671 b .662 .680

Fisher's Exact Test 59.983 .674 b

.665 .683

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.590 1 .207 .212 .203 .220

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 59 cells (65.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.261.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .102 .114 .108 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 59 cells (65.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.261.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .045 .020 2.234

Education Dependent .073 .034 2.050

P6BSC Dependent .023 .018 1.303

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .045 .009

tau

P6BSC Dependent .010 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 114

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .025

Education Dependent .040

P6BSC Dependent .193

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .649 c .668 d

tau

P6BSC Dependent .779 c

.726 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P6BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .659 .678

tau

P6BSC Dependent .717 .734

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .397 .566 .576 a .566 .585

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 115

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 79.260 a

64 .095 .068 b

.063 .073

Likelihood Ratio 79.795 64 .088 .092 b .086 .097

Fisher's Exact Test 71.607 .090 b

.084 .096

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .001 1 .971 .974 .971 .977

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 55 cells (64.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .037.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .479 .498 .488 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 55 cells (64.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .037.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .061 .028 2.122

Education Dependent .073 .039 1.808

P7BSC Dependent .052 .027 1.870

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .055 .010

tau

P7BSC Dependent .015 .005

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 116

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .034

Education Dependent .071

P7BSC Dependent .062

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .129 c .101 d

tau

P7BSC Dependent .060 c

.124 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P7BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .095 .107

tau

P7BSC Dependent .118 .131

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .430 .095 .068 a .063 .073

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 117

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 62.445 a

64 .532 .546 b

.536 .556

Likelihood Ratio 68.564 64 .325 .499 b .490 .509

Fisher's Exact Test 59.914 .453 b

.443 .462

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .400 1 .527 .530 .520 .540

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 53 cells (62.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.633.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .260 .278 .269 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 53 cells (62.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.633.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .046 .027 1.681

Education Dependent .052 .038 1.337

P7ASC Dependent .041 .025 1.581

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .044 .009

tau

P7ASC Dependent .014 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 118

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .093

Education Dependent .181

P7ASC Dependent .114

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .566 c .580 d

tau

P7ASC Dependent .099 c

.155 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P7ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .570 .590

tau

P7ASC Dependent .148 .162

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .389 .532 .546 a .536 .556

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 119

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 66.413 a

60 .266 .257 b

.249 .266

Likelihood Ratio 72.663 60 .126 .219 b .211 .227

Fisher's Exact Test 61.757 .262 b

.254 .271

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.462 1 .227 .232 .224 .240

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 49 cells (61.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.209.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .109 .122 .116 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 49 cells (61.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.209.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .042 .015 2.759

Education Dependent .085 .028 2.919

P8ASC Dependent .007 .014 .472

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .048 .010

tau

P8ASC Dependent .011 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 120

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .006

Education Dependent .004

P8ASC Dependent .637

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .232 c .218 d

tau

P8ASC Dependent .639 c

.607 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P8ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .210 .226

tau

P8ASC Dependent .597 .616

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .399 .266 .257 a .249 .266

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 121

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 50.451 a

56 .684 .708 b

.699 .716

Likelihood Ratio 55.930 56 .477 .604 b .594 .613

Fisher's Exact Test 48.501 .711 b

.702 .720

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .696 1 .404 .406 .396 .415

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 49 cells (65.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .834.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .196 .212 .204 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 49 cells (65.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .834.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .022 .016 1.362

Education Dependent .040 .027 1.448

P8BSC Dependent .007 .019 .365

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .036 .008

tau

P8BSC Dependent .009 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 122

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .173

Education Dependent .148

P8BSC Dependent .715

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .685 c .707 d

tau

P8BSC Dependent .869 c

.806 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P8BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .698 .716

tau

P8BSC Dependent .798 .813

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .355 .684 .708 a .699 .716

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 123

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 72.903 a

76 .579 .595 b

.586 .605

Likelihood Ratio 79.893 76 .358 .563 b .554 .573

Fisher's Exact Test 69.254 .543 b

.534 .553

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .551 1 .458 .468 .458 .477

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 69 cells (69.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.742.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .225 .241 .233 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 69 cells (69.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.742.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .026 .019 1.326

Education Dependent .044 .034 1.273

P9ASC Dependent .010 .014 .728

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .049 .009

tau

P9ASC Dependent .011 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 124

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .185

Education Dependent .203

P9ASC Dependent .467

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .706 c .728 d

tau

P9ASC Dependent .562 c

.533 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P9ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .719 .737

tau

P9ASC Dependent .524 .543

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .415 .579 .595 a .586 .605

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 125

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 97.038 a

80 .094 .069 b

.064 .074

Likelihood Ratio 99.998 80 .065 .086 b .080 .091

Fisher's Exact Test 88.166 .066 b

.061 .071

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .033 1 .856 .861 .854 .868

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 79 cells (75.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .181.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .425 .445 .435 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 79 cells (75.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .181.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .062 .022 2.770

Education Dependent .085 .030 2.764

P9BSC Dependent .044 .032 1.337

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .069 .011

tau

P9BSC Dependent .016 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 126

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .006

Education Dependent .006

P9BSC Dependent .181

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .100 c .073 d

tau

P9BSC Dependent .020 c

.067 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P9BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .068 .078

tau

P9BSC Dependent .062 .072

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .466 .094 .069 a .064 .074

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 127

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 61.497 a

56 .286 .266 b

.257 .274

Likelihood Ratio 63.131 56 .239 .242 b .233 .250

Fisher's Exact Test 60.530 .197 b

.189 .205

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.541 1 .214 .222 .214 .230

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 47 cells (62.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.241.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .100 .113 .106 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 47 cells (62.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.241.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .052 .023 2.215

Education Dependent .065 .029 2.152

P10ASC Dependent .041 .030 1.345

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .045 .009

tau

P10ASC Dependent .013 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 128

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .027

Education Dependent .031

P10ASC Dependent .179

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .261 c .240 d

tau

P10ASC Dependent .278 c

.307 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P10ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .232 .249

tau

P10ASC Dependent .298 .316

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .387 .286 .266 a .257 .274

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 129

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 46.920 a

52 .673 .697 b

.688 .706

Likelihood Ratio 48.230 52 .623 .782 b .774 .790

Fisher's Exact Test 44.364 .697 b

.688 .706

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 2.380 1 .123 .127 .120 .133

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 42 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.543.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .061 .070 .066 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 42 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.543.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .039 .019 1.987

Education Dependent .044 .025 1.769

P10BSC Dependent .034 .029 1.165

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .033 .009

tau

P10BSC Dependent .010 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 130

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .047

Education Dependent .077

P10BSC Dependent .244

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .727 c .745 d

tau

P10BSC Dependent .694 c

.646 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P10BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .737 .754

tau

P10BSC Dependent .637 .656

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .344 .673 .697 a .688 .706

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 131

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 71.463 a

68 .364 .356 b

.346 .365

Likelihood Ratio 74.557 68 .274 .372 b .363 .382

Fisher's Exact Test 66.173 .372 b

.362 .381

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 3.483 1 .062 .064 .060 .069

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 55 cells (61.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.866.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .029 .036 .032 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 55 cells (61.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.866.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .044 .023 1.828

Education Dependent .060 .036 1.614

P11ASC Dependent .030 .026 1.136

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .052 .011

tau

P11ASC Dependent .012 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 132

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .068

Education Dependent .106

P11ASC Dependent .256

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .336 c .321 d

tau

P11ASC Dependent .380 c

.388 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P11ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .312 .330

tau

P11ASC Dependent .379 .398

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .412 .364 .356 a .346 .365

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 133

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 75.852 a

72 .355 .348 b

.338 .357

Likelihood Ratio 79.188 72 .263 .433 b .424 .443

Fisher's Exact Test 66.819 .461 b

.451 .471

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .008 1 .929 .931 .926 .936

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 58 cells (61.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.088.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .446 .465 .455 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 58 cells (61.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .16.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.088.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .044 .024 1.777

Education Dependent .073 .030 2.383

P11BSC Dependent .020 .031 .647

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .057 .010

tau

P11BSC Dependent .011 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 134

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .076

Education Dependent .017

P11BSC Dependent .517

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .258 c .246 d

tau

P11BSC Dependent .498 c

.490 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Education Dependent

P11BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Education Dependent .237 .254

tau

P11BSC Dependent .480 .499

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .422 .355 .348 a .338 .357

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 135

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 34.374 a

32 .355 .340 b

.331 .349

Likelihood Ratio 36.937 32 .251 .367 b .358 .377

Fisher's Exact Test 33.443 .309 b

.300 .318

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .032 1 .858 .863 .856 .870

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 27 cells (52.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.179.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .422 .441 .431 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 27 cells (52.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.179.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .089 .029 2.992

Experience in VSP

Dependent .155 .042 3.459

P1A Standard score

Dependent .037 .028 1.309

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .049 .014

P1A Standard score

Dependent .007 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 136

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .003

Experience in VSP

Dependent .001

P1A Standard score

Dependent .191

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .357 c .347 d

P1A Standard score

Dependent .143 c .196 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P1A Standard score

Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .338 .356

P1A Standard score

Dependent .188 .203

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .299 .355 .340 a .331 .349

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 137

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 19.475 a

30 .929 .952 b

.948 .956

Likelihood Ratio 21.429 30 .874 .954 b .950 .959

Fisher's Exact Test 20.234 .927 b

.922 .932

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .579 1 .447 .457 .448 .467

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 24 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .761.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .219 .236 .228 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 24 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .761.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .063 .033 1.875

Experience in VSP

Dependent .112 .051 2.068

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .024 .029 .809

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .028 .011

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .005 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 138

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .061

Experience in VSP

Dependent .039

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .418

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .931 c .953 d

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .682 c .622 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P1B Standard Score

Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .949 .957

P1B Standard Score

Dependent .612 .631

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .230 .929 .952 a .948 .956

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 139

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 31.837 a

36 .667 .726 b

.717 .735

Likelihood Ratio 35.495 36 .492 .718 b .709 .726

Fisher's Exact Test 32.386 .581 b

.571 .590

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .068 1 .794 .804 .796 .811

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 33 cells (57.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.261.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .396 .415 .405 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 33 cells (57.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.261.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .070 .033 2.052

Experience in VSP

Dependent .134 .054 2.309

P2ASC Dependent .020 .028 .718

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .046 .012

P2ASC Dependent .007 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 140

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .040

Experience in VSP

Dependent .021

P2ASC Dependent .473

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .670 c .721 d

P2ASC Dependent .232 c .281 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P2ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .713 .730

P2ASC Dependent .272 .290

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .289 .667 .726 a .717 .735

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 141

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 24.459 a

34 .886 .952 b

.947 .956

Likelihood Ratio 25.736 34 .845 .957 b .953 .961

Fisher's Exact Test 23.614 .948 b

.944 .953

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .707 1 .400 .403 .393 .413

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 27 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .841.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .195 .211 .203 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 27 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .841.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .064 .026 2.424

Experience in VSP

Dependent .116 .046 2.378

P2BSC Dependent .023 .018 1.260

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .035 .010

P2BSC Dependent .004 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 142

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .015

Experience in VSP

Dependent .017

P2BSC Dependent .208

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .888 c .957 d

P2BSC Dependent .895 c .812 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P2BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .953 .961

P2BSC Dependent .805 .820

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .256 .886 .952 a .947 .956

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 143

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 33.633 a

34 .486 .496 b

.486 .505

Likelihood Ratio 35.829 34 .383 .528 b .518 .537

Fisher's Exact Test 31.482 .552 b

.543 .562

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .359 1 .549 .554 .544 .564

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 18 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .599.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .269 .286 .278 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 18 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .599.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .081 .027 2.937

Experience in VSP

Dependent .159 .047 3.160

P3ASC Dependent .022 .024 .928

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .048 .015

P3ASC Dependent .005 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 144

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .003

Experience in VSP

Dependent .002

P3ASC Dependent .353

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .489 c .496 d

P3ASC Dependent .674 c .645 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P3ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .486 .506

P3ASC Dependent .636 .654

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .296 .486 .496 a .486 .505

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 145

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 37.807 a

36 .387 .386 b

.376 .396

Likelihood Ratio 38.887 36 .341 .484 b .474 .493

Fisher's Exact Test 35.962 .406 b

.396 .416

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 2.468 1 .116 .111 .105 .118

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 27 cells (47.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.571.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .051 .060 .055 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 27 cells (47.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.571.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .086 .026 3.145

Experience in VSP

Dependent .177 .048 3.414

P3BSC Dependent .017 .019 .871

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .054 .016

P3BSC Dependent .007 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 146

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .002

Experience in VSP

Dependent .001

P3BSC Dependent .384

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .393 c .390 d

P3BSC Dependent .263 c .292 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P3BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .381 .400

P3BSC Dependent .283 .301

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .312 .387 .386 a .376 .396

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 147

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 23.123 a

28 .727 .762 b

.753 .770

Likelihood Ratio 28.050 28 .462 .629 b .620 .639

Fisher's Exact Test 23.609 .687 b

.678 .696

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .001 1 .975 .978 .975 .981

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 21 cells (46.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .031.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .475 .494 .485 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 21 cells (46.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .031.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .060 .034 1.733

Experience in VSP

Dependent .099 .057 1.645

P4ASC Dependent .030 .027 1.085

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .033 .010

P4ASC Dependent .005 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 148

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .083

Experience in VSP

Dependent .100

P4ASC Dependent .278

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .729 c .760 d

P4ASC Dependent .695 c .635 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P4ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .752 .769

P4ASC Dependent .625 .644

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .249 .727 .762 a .753 .770

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 149

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 31.899 a

30 .372 .358 b

.349 .367

Likelihood Ratio 34.659 30 .255 .370 b .361 .380

Fisher's Exact Test 31.950 .278 b

.270 .287

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .712 1 .399 .393 .384 .403

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 24 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.844.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .187 .202 .194 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 24 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.844.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .090 .032 2.756

Experience in VSP

Dependent .142 .052 2.578

P4BSC Dependent .050 .027 1.788

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .046 .013

P4BSC Dependent .008 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 150

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .006

Experience in VSP

Dependent .010

P4BSC Dependent .074

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .372 c .355 d

P4BSC Dependent .060 c .114 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P4BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .346 .364

P4BSC Dependent .108 .120

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .289 .372 .358 a .349 .367

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 151

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 23.972 a

28 .683 .707 b

.698 .716

Likelihood Ratio 25.799 28 .584 .737 b .728 .746

Fisher's Exact Test 22.561 .744 b

.735 .752

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.840 1 .175 .178 .171 .186

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 21 cells (46.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .65.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.357.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .086 .097 .091 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 21 cells (46.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .65.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.357.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .059 .028 2.079

Experience in VSP

Dependent .121 .050 2.303

P5ASC Dependent .010 .021 .481

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .034 .012

P5ASC Dependent .005 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 152

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .038

Experience in VSP

Dependent .021

P5ASC Dependent .631

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .680 c .698 d

P5ASC Dependent .655 c .611 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P5ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .689 .707

P5ASC Dependent .601 .620

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .253 .683 .707 a .698 .716

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 153

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 28.964 a

24 .221 .221 b

.213 .229

Likelihood Ratio 30.920 24 .156 .230 b .221 .238

Fisher's Exact Test 28.354 .214 b

.206 .222

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .464 1 .496 .502 .492 .512

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 15 cells (38.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.30.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.681.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .244 .261 .253 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 15 cells (38.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is 1.30.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.681.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .069 .027 2.535

Experience in VSP

Dependent .129 .050 2.422

P5BSC Dependent .023 .017 1.351

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .041 .014

P5BSC Dependent .007 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 154

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .011

Experience in VSP

Dependent .015

P5BSC Dependent .177

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .222 c .211 d

P5BSC Dependent .196 c .218 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P5BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .203 .219

P5BSC Dependent .210 .226

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .276 .221 .221 a .213 .229

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 155

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 31.484 a

38 .763 .808 b

.800 .815

Likelihood Ratio 34.233 38 .644 .796 b .788 .804

Fisher's Exact Test 30.743 .795 b

.787 .803

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .243 1 .622 .623 .613 .632

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 27 cells (45.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .493.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .308 .327 .317 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 27 cells (45.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .493.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .071 .028 2.485

Experience in VSP

Dependent .142 .043 3.120

P6ASC Dependent .016 .025 .651

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .045 .012

P6ASC Dependent .004 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 156

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .013

Experience in VSP

Dependent .002

P6ASC Dependent .515

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .765 c .808 d

P6ASC Dependent .833 c .772 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P6ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .800 .815

P6ASC Dependent .764 .780

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .287 .763 .808 a .800 .815

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 157

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 25.003 a

34 .869 .905 b

.899 .910

Likelihood Ratio 26.875 34 .802 .906 b .900 .912

Fisher's Exact Test 25.206 .880 b

.873 .886

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .024 1 .877 .876 .870 .883

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 21 cells (38.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.155.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .433 .453 .443 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 21 cells (38.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.155.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .050 .020 2.416

Experience in VSP

Dependent .116 .046 2.416

P6BSC Dependent .000 .000 .c

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .036 .012

P6BSC Dependent .004 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 158

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .016

Experience in VSP

Dependent .016

P6BSC Dependent .c

tau Dependent .868 d .902 e

P6BSC Dependent .911 d .865 e

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P6BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .896 .908

P6BSC Dependent .858 .872

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.

d. Based on chi-square approximation

e. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .258 .869 .905 a .899 .910

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 159

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 31.715 a

32 .481 .494 b

.484 .504

Likelihood Ratio 35.442 32 .309 .462 b .452 .472

Fisher's Exact Test 30.561 .461 b

.452 .471

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .200 1 .655 .657 .647 .666

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 27 cells (52.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .447.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .319 .337 .328 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 27 cells (52.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .447.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .080 .024 3.231

Experience in VSP

Dependent .134 .042 2.979

P7BSC Dependent .038 .021 1.817

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .045 .011

P7BSC Dependent .007 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 160

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .001

Experience in VSP

Dependent .003

P7BSC Dependent .069

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .484 c .491 d

P7BSC Dependent .194 c .243 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P7BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .481 .500

P7BSC Dependent .235 .252

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .288 .481 .494 a .484 .504

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 161

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 48.713 a

32 .030 .018 b

.015 .020

Likelihood Ratio 53.455 32 .010 .020 b .017 .023

Fisher's Exact Test 45.363 .021 b

.018 .024

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .078 1 .780 .778 .769 .786

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 24 cells (47.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .279.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .382 .401 .392 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 24 cells (47.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .279.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .107 .033 3.145

Experience in VSP

Dependent .207 .051 3.710

P7ASC Dependent .027 .029 .944

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .069 .017

P7ASC Dependent .010 .004

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 162

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .002

Experience in VSP

Dependent .000

P7ASC Dependent .345

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .031 c .017 d

P7ASC Dependent .007 c .028 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P7ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .014 .019

P7ASC Dependent .024 .031

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .350 .030 .018 a .015 .020

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 163

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 34.280 a

30 .270 .258 b

.249 .266

Likelihood Ratio 35.035 30 .241 .353 b .343 .362

Fisher's Exact Test 33.428 .233 b

.225 .241

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .567 1 .452 .464 .454 .474

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 21 cells (43.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .753.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .222 .239 .231 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 21 cells (43.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .753.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .083 .028 2.937

Experience in VSP

Dependent .164 .050 3.044

P8ASC Dependent .020 .019 1.062

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .049 .015

P8ASC Dependent .008 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 164

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .003

Experience in VSP

Dependent .002

P8ASC Dependent .288

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .276 c .262 d

P8ASC Dependent .101 c .138 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P8ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .253 .270

P8ASC Dependent .131 .144

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .299 .270 .258 a .249 .266

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 165

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 18.790 a

28 .905 .932 b

.927 .937

Likelihood Ratio 19.274 28 .889 .946 b .942 .951

Fisher's Exact Test 18.230 .939 b

.934 .943

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .000 1 .994 .994 .993 .996

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 18 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .008.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .488 .507 .498 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 18 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .008.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .051 .029 1.747

Experience in VSP

Dependent .108 .052 1.969

P8BSC Dependent .007 .021 .324

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .027 .011

P8BSC Dependent .003 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 166

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .081

Experience in VSP

Dependent .049

P8BSC Dependent .746

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .905 c .935 d

P8BSC Dependent .976 c .942 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P8BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .930 .940

P8BSC Dependent .938 .947

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .226 .905 .932 a .927 .937

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 167

Crosstab

Count

P9ASC

30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5

Experience in VSP 1-10 1 0 2 1 1 7 9 8

10-20 0 1 1 2 3 5 6 14

20-30 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 8

Total 1 1 5 5 5 13 15 30

Crosstab

Count

P9ASC

50 52.5 55 57.5 60 62.5 65 67.5

Experience in VSP 1-10 9 20 12 13 10 6 6 4

10-20 8 18 12 10 9 6 6 9

20-30 19 16 16 11 14 6 7 4

Total 36 54 40 34 33 18 19 17

Crosstab

Count

P9ASC

70 72.5 75 80 Total

Experience in VSP 1-10 4 3 1 1 118

10-20 4 1 2 1 118

20-30 2 3 2 0 114

Total 10 7 5 2 350

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 37.062 a

38 .513 .524 b

.515 .534

Likelihood Ratio 42.693 38 .276 .444 b .435 .454

Fisher's Exact Test 38.311 .378 b

.369 .388

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .860 1 .354 .367 .358 .377

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 31 cells (51.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .927.

Page 168

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .174 .190 .182 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 31 cells (51.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .927.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .072 .027 2.636

Experience in VSP

Dependent .151 .047 3.007

P9ASC Dependent .010 .020 .507

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .053 .014

P9ASC Dependent .006 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 169

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .008

Experience in VSP

Dependent .003

P9ASC Dependent .612

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .525 c .530 d

P9ASC Dependent .339 c .349 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P9ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .520 .540

P9ASC Dependent .339 .358

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .309 .513 .524 a .515 .534

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 170

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 35.496 a

40 .673 .716 b

.707 .725

Likelihood Ratio 40.323 40 .456 .692 b .683 .701

Fisher's Exact Test 33.021 .762 b

.754 .771

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .729 1 .393 .402 .392 .412

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 36 cells (57.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.854.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .198 .214 .206 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 36 cells (57.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.854.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .079 .032 2.421

Experience in VSP

Dependent .138 .050 2.603

P9BSC Dependent .034 .028 1.181

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .051 .012

P9BSC Dependent .005 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 171

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .015

Experience in VSP

Dependent .009

P9BSC Dependent .238

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .670 c .707 d

P9BSC Dependent .811 c .718 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P9BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .698 .716

P9BSC Dependent .709 .726

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .303 .673 .716 a .707 .725

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 172

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 20.069 a

28 .862 .916 b

.910 .921

Likelihood Ratio 21.857 28 .788 .913 b .908 .919

Fisher's Exact Test 18.622 .941 b

.936 .945

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .184 1 .668 .678 .669 .687

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 18 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .429.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .336 .355 .346 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 18 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is .429.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .042 .026 1.569

Experience in VSP

Dependent .078 .046 1.636

P10ASC Dependent .014 .020 .667

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .029 .009

P10ASC Dependent .003 .002

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 173

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .117

Experience in VSP

Dependent .102

P10ASC Dependent .505

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .863 c .916 d

P10ASC Dependent .995 c .979 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P10ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .911 .922

P10ASC Dependent .976 .982

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .233 .862 .916 a .910 .921

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 174

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 25.904 a

26 .468 .479 b

.469 .489

Likelihood Ratio 26.787 26 .421 .577 b .567 .587

Fisher's Exact Test 25.150 .466 b

.456 .475

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 1.955 1 .162 .161 .154 .168

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 15 cells (35.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.398.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .077 .088 .082 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 15 cells (35.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is 1.398.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .074 .029 2.514

Experience in VSP

Dependent .134 .046 2.759

P10BSC Dependent .027 .029 .931

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .037 .013

P10BSC Dependent .007 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 175

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .012

Experience in VSP

Dependent .006

P10BSC Dependent .352

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .471 c .480 d

P10BSC Dependent .277 c .300 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P10BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .470 .490

P10BSC Dependent .291 .309

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .263 .468 .479 a .469 .489

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 176

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 26.981 a

34 .798 .838 b

.831 .846

Likelihood Ratio 29.565 34 .685 .846 b .839 .853

Fisher's Exact Test 26.835 .804 b

.797 .812

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association .394 1 .530 .526 .516 .535

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 24 cells (44.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.628.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .256 .273 .265 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 24 cells (44.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -.628.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .077 .033 2.243

Experience in VSP

Dependent .142 .059 2.267

P11ASC Dependent .026 .026 1.001

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .038 .013

P11ASC Dependent .006 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 177

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .025

Experience in VSP

Dependent .023

P11ASC Dependent .317

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .803 c .842 d

P11ASC Dependent .511 c .492 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P11ASC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .835 .850

P11ASC Dependent .482 .501

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .268 .798 .838 a .831 .846

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 178

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Asymp. Sig.

Value df (2-sided) Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Pearson Chi-Square 41.247 a

36 .252 .245 b

.237 .253

Likelihood Ratio 45.220 36 .139 .271 b .262 .280

Fisher's Exact Test 37.861 .290 b

.281 .299

Linear-by-Linear c b

Association 2.191 1 .139 .138 .131 .144

N of Valid Cases 350

a. 27 cells (47.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.480.

Chi-Square Tests

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sig.

Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association .064 .074 .069 b

N of Valid Cases

a. 27 cells (47.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count

is .33.

b. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

c. The standardized statistic is -1.480.

Directional Measures

Asymp. Std.

Value Errora Approx. Tb

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .072 .025 2.833

Experience in VSP

Dependent .155 .042 3.428

P11BSC Dependent .007 .019 .343

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .059 .014

P11BSC Dependent .006 .003

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 179

Directional Measures

Monte

Carlo

Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .005

Experience in VSP

Dependent .001

P11BSC Dependent .732

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .253 c .238 d

P11BSC Dependent .311 c .341 d

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Directional Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric

Experience in VSP

Dependent

P11BSC Dependent

Goodman and Kruskal Experience in VSP

tau Dependent .230 .247

P11BSC Dependent .331 .350

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on chi-square approximation

d. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Symmetric Measures

95% Confidence Interval

Value Approx. Sig. Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .325 .252 .245 a .237 .253

N of Valid Cases 350

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 605580418.

Page 180

- Unit 2 ExercisesUploaded byAbubakr Alisawy
- 3 - Impact of Non-monetary Rewards on Employees Motivation a Study of Commercial Banks in KarachiUploaded byUmair Khan Niazi
- 20140303_TestMemo1.pdfUploaded by2009028818
- 8[1].Basic Stat InferenceUploaded byManish Mahabir
- 85_161_Virosil Pharma Brochure - (New)Uploaded byvk
- mata hati jkuUploaded byAri Setiyo Sidik
- Solutions to Practice Problems for Week 3.pdfUploaded byJose Ruben Sorto Bada
- Lampiran 3 OutputUploaded bybabyK
- ENSYUploaded byBintang
- Chi Square TestUploaded byAbhishek Ghatak
- RPG131.docxUploaded byIerah Mohd Hgg
- the beginningUploaded byapi-323248433
- Frequencies RositaUploaded byRositawati Sumarto
- math1040Uploaded byapi-238312886
- Basic Statistics Session 2Uploaded byakragnarock
- Research Methodology- MB0050 (1)Uploaded bysudhirasutkar12
- CFA Exam Result ExplanationUploaded byGart Desa
- Risk Management in Geotechnical EngineeringUploaded byoscar2302
- Racial Gap in Management of Pediatric Appendicitis PainUploaded bymysteriousdress42
- chi patrat.pdfUploaded byv
- math 1040 final project 1Uploaded byapi-272578219
- Structural Failure of Large Bulk ShipsUploaded byscheisshandy
- pnw_gtr211Uploaded bymyco sam
- Www.scielo.br PDF Bjorl v75n3 v75n3a18Uploaded bykhanasifalam
- Migration and Education Experiences of Refugee Children in the East Region of CameroonUploaded byEditor IJTSRD
- Coke Drum Remaining LifeUploaded byash1968
- Hypertension 2002 Myerson 750 5Uploaded byMadhusudan Singh Rathore
- 4Uploaded byRavi Singh
- jmeterUploaded byneovik82
- ch17Uploaded byImam Awaluddin

- Pressure Transient TestingUploaded byJuli Santacruz
- g10mathUploaded byKarla Hoffman
- RamanuJan LostnotebookUploaded byNarendrn Kanaeson
- Abrevieri in EnglezaUploaded byEugen
- Efecto de Masa Corporal en Qx AneUploaded byElias Sinahi Ramirez Sanchez
- Hapter 3 r Isk and ReturnUploaded byAbdii Dhufeera
- A Pentagonal Prism 25mm Sides of Base and 60 Mm Axis Length Rests on HP on One of Its Edges of the BaseUploaded byPraveena R Rajanna
- CHAPTER 02 - Linear CodesUploaded byNuruljannah Mohd Mazuki
- Conserving Natural Resources in Olive Orchards on Sloping Land Alternative Goal Programming Approaches Toawards Effective Design of Cross_compliance and Agrienvironmental Measures_ LUUK FLESKENSUploaded byRybens Sola
- 4 Ways to Insert Equations in Microsoft Word - WikiHowUploaded byAliceAlormenu
- Digital Signal Processors Application ArchitectureUploaded byanjugadu
- 206 / 401E : Operations Management Unit - I :Uploaded bysangeeta_bais1827
- Ansys Coursework 3Uploaded byWei Hong Teh
- Angles - MathsUploaded byJannifer Love U
- Comparison of PSD Calculating MethodsUploaded byccdj1235
- When Should You BypassUploaded byAnonymous 1A7olH
- 12 - UDMUploaded bychanchai T
- Swinburne Multi VerseUploaded byAna Thereza
- Low-Complexity High-Speed Decoder Design ForUploaded byVel_udhaya
- Multinivel Modelo Estadística SPSSUploaded byMichele Wright
- GEOP320 Wavelet Estimation Project 2016Uploaded bytarek moahmoud khalifa
- HPhys Unit 07 COEM Packet 2012Uploaded byKelly O'Shea
- Grade 8 Exponents and Powers InUploaded bybhawanasharma
- Hybrid Reward Architecture for Reinforcement LearningUploaded byPanthros
- Newton, Isaac - OpticksUploaded byGeoff Bonning
- 1d Steel Shear Connections CE438 538 F15Uploaded byanshul
- RPP_05_BDA37101 TERKINI 2014Uploaded byAina Syazwana Zulkefli
- STATISTICUploaded byEzManso
- Greg Morris Core Rotation StrategyUploaded byfredtag4393
- UntitledUploaded byscribd_1008