This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
by Judyth Vary Baker
First of all, Lee Harvey Oswald did not kill John F. Kennedy. But if you knew who actually had Kennedy killed, you might not accept the choices you are being offered to vote for to run America. You might also understand why we have gone to war and never win wars anymore (not profitable for the military-industrial complex to end wars successfully rather, to start a new war somewhere else before the old war ends is more profitable, though blood is shed .) You might understand why so much money and effort goes into specials yo try to prove to you that Oswald killed JFK/ You might write Tom Hanks and tell him not to besmirch his patriotic image by doing the mini-series he s signed up for, to be shown in 2013, the 50th anniversary of Kennedy s death, showing Oswald as the cold-blooded assassin. The fellow who convinced Tom Hanks to make such a series was given a million dollars in advance to write his big book that supposedly researched everything and concluded Oswald killed JFK. That character never even spoke to me, though he spent quite a few paragraphs disparaging me. The man who got all that money to do research got his information about me from people who also never met me. So it s time for somebody tell Tom Hanks to read my book, Me & Lee! And just be so kind as to speak to me! Meanwhile, beware of the TV specials and computer animations that assail America every November proving Oswald killed JFK. Americans are not a stupid people, so these efforts continue every year. One in 2003 by Dale Myers looks quite convincing to the uninformed viewer. Of course, the viewer has to believe what is being shown. And what did the viewer see, regarding Myers clever computer animation? (We won t go into the fact that the very angle of the bullet shown, entering Kennedy, is too low to have come from where Oswald was supposed to be located, nor will we (until later) bring up the fact that Kennedy, upon being shot, supposedly from behind, was thrown violently BACK and TO THE LEFT from the bullet that supposedly hit him in the back of the head.) My fellow patriots, ! I live in exile, my life having been systematically threatened, my reputation besmirched, and my family (and some friends) afraid to even help me, all because I ve spoken out, and the people who are powerful enough to pay for these big books, these expensive computer animations, and these TV movies are also powerful enough to ruin people s lives. However, I refuse to shut up. Even though enormous lies and falsehoods and quotes are linked to me that the media refuses to retract or correct, in particular Wikipedia, whose biographies on living persons are sometimes travesties.
Then there s major TV media and Internet media. The History Channel banned TMWKK Documentary THE LOVE AFFAIR about Lee and me without even checking to see if I had evidence to back up my story. It was bad enough that my witnesses were not included in the documentary (one had been gthreatened). Just this week, I was directed to view what the History Channel, in its Conspiracy Theories Internet video, states concerning what it calls a fact that I claim to have invented AIDS! You can view the History Channel s outright lie about me right here: http://www.history.com/videos/jfk-assassion-conspiracy-theories#jfk-assassion-conspiracy-theories
³JFK Assassion Conspiracy Theories (3:57 minutes) This History Channel video covers the President Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories. The Warren Commission explored these theories. One theory was that Lee Harvey Oswald was working on behalf of Castro because the CIA tried to assassinate him.´ What the blurb doesn¶t tell you is how the History Channel is trying to rewrite history. Jim Marrs has written dozens of books, but the History Channel mentions only an oddity about UFO¶s and Aluiens to discredit his groundbreaking book, Crossfire, which was the major basis of the Oliver stone movie, JFK ± a must-see (don¶t believe the lies!) for anyone who wants an introduction to the truth. Then there¶s the slap to researcher Ed Haslam¶s face²the author of Dr. Mary¶s Monkey--- even as the History Channel slams Mr. Haslam, they offer his book for sale in their online bookstore! ³I can see for miles and miles´ is the theme song used in this smear campaign by the History Channel ± yet NOBODY ever so much and sent me an email to verify the statement that I claimed to have invented AIDS. They didn¶t µsee¶ anything. Imagine if YOU had AIDS, and somebody told YOU that I lived down the street. Is it any wonder that I am forced to live in exile and that I get death threats? Where did the History Channel get its information from? America, do you like the way your history books are being rewritten?
Nobody from the History Channel bothered to ask me if the quote they use against me is true. And unlike my beloved friend, Martha Rose Crow, who stood by my side and is now suddenly dead, I m still alive! I can still defend myself! Imagine what these people, then, have callously done to Lee H. Oswald, falsely accused of assassinating President John F. Kennedy, whom I defend, having known the accused assassin. The chances of my book, which will be soon released, of even being mentioned peripherally by these people are quite small and if mentioned, it will probably only be to place it up for target practice by these same people. Therefore, while I have breath remaining in my body, though severely limited depending on YOU to publish this material for me--I will defend myself, Lee Oswald, and John Kennedy from America s enemies. If you think America is doing fine right now, stop reading. You either possess a two-digit IQ, or you believe everything the government tells you because it s patriotic to do so. When America had its revolution and escaped from the clutches of King George of England, those who refused to help the brave patriots who carved out a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal, also believed it was wisest to do nothing. We who love our country cannot allow America to remain in darkness. Let us begin here: examining the Emmy award-winning animation by Mr. Myers, in a typical frame:
Remember: THE FANCY ANIMATIONS AND TV SPECIALS YOU ARE FORCE-FED BY THE MEDIA AND THE GOVERNMENT EVERY NOVEMBER ARE CREATED TO CONVINCE YOU THAT OSWALD DID IT. THE EXAMPLE ABOVE IS TYPICAL OF HOW THE TRUTH IS TWISTED AND RIGGED. In Z Frame 225, we examine Dale Meyers animation which won him an Emmy -- versus the Zapruder film that the American people were not allowed to see for decades.
When we do so, we find that Meyers animation is misleading and that the bullet as shown would not have hit Connally. We have the heads of Connally shown at the same size in both instances as for comparison. Immediately, we have to note that the animation is different from the reality. (1) Car angle is wrong in the animation, placing Connally more to the right than he was in the ZFILM (2) Kennedy s body is too small in the animation (too much foreshortening) even when suit is taken into account (3) Kennedy is significantly closer to the viewer in the Z film note size of JFK s head
(4) When measured nose-to-nose, Connally is shown too close to Kennedy in the animation When adjusted for these errors, the bullet shown passing through Kennedy s neck (in error) nevertheless still would not have hit Connally. It would have missed Connally s shoulder, had the animation sizes been correct. The bunched-up jacket has been used to demonstrate that holes in the jacket could not be used to conclude where the bullet that hit Kennedy hit Kennedy s body. Fair enough. But what about Lennedy s shirt? The shirt was securely tucked in, being a dress shirt of the era.
The hole seen here, which has nothing to do with a bunched-up jacket, is located somewhat to the right of center. The entry hole location can be compared with the point of entry assumed in the animation. The entry hole shown in the animation has been moved more toward the right of the actual hole shown in the shirt. The exit hole in the animated version is shown below Kennedy s Adam s apple (larynx).
All well and good, IF there hadn¶t been bones in the way! Harrison Livingston, in The Radical Right and the Murder of John F. Kennedy, makes a clear case, later supported by the work of Dr. David Mantik, Dr. James Fetzer (The Great Zapruder Film Hoax), Doug Horne of the ARRB (Inside the ARRB) and others that we can trust that Kennedy¶s autopsy was rigged and that the Zapruder film itself was altered, including, as Horne has reported, as verified by a respected group of Hollywood film restoration experts led by Sydney Wilkinson, that frames in the Zapruder film were blacked out where the back of kennedy¶s head would have shown a bullet emerged, having struck kennedy from the front. There wasn;t a word in the media about this astonishing FACT when it became known late in 2009.
Furthermore, Dr. Mantik ±described by those who don¶t want you to respect him as a mere µradiologist¶ ± though he¶s much, much more --has demonstrated that a bullet striking Kennedy in the neck would not have been able to exit without striking Kennedy¶s neck vertebrae. The original neck wound at the Adam¶s apple location was an entry wound and was described --- at Parkland Hospital where Kennedy was taken after being shot ---as an entry wound by all the doctors involved with the tracheotomy ±experienced Dallas ER crime scene doctors, no less. And they all described a blow-out to the upper back and side of JFK¶s skull caused by a bullet from the front. Nevertheless, efforts continue to hide the truth from the American people. It has to stop. When people view the cleverly drawn animation, they do not have an opportunity to make the measurements we mention. No doubt this year, the animation efforts of Mr. Meyers, et al, will be trotted out again to convince the public that a single bullet ± the so-called Magic Bullet ± hit both men. It¶s a lie.
Below is what the Dallas (not US government) doctors and nurses testified as to what they saw before JFK s official autopsy (where Kennedy s brain got lost the brain that would have proved which way the shots were fired!): note the entry wound in the throat and an entry wound that exited to the back of the head that came from a shot fired from the front, consistent with the strong back and to the left reaction of the body. Anyone who has shot a deer or is familiar with same understands that when a bullet strikes an object, from the front, it pushes that object back. Martin Luther King, shot from the front, was thrown back so violently that witnesses said his shoes were thrown off his feet: ³... And I didn't realize it was a shot. I looked over the railing and people were ducking. ... And I think it knocked one of his shoes off«´ Rev. Kyles Ref: www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId.
³«At 6:01 p.m., as Dr. King stood behind the iron balcony railing in front of room 306, the report of a high-powered rifle cracked the air. A slug tore into the right side of his face, violently throwing him backward.´
But the American people were told lies, right from the beginning, about that very fact. The eminent journalist/reporter Dan Rather told us, the American people, who didn¶t get to see the Zapruder film for decades (but he did!) that the President lurched forward just a bit, uh, it was obvious he had been hit in the movie but you had to be looking very closely in order to see it. the second shot hit President Kennedy and there was no doubt there, his head ... went forward with considerable violence ... Mrs. Kennedy stood up immediately her mouth wide open Ref. Dan Rather interview by Hughes Rudd, immediately after Rather saw the secret Zapruder film : transcript at http://www.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/10th_Issue/d_rather.html The Zapruder film clearly shows Kennedy being shot, and his head being thrown violently BACKWARDS, consistent with a SHOT FROM THE FRONT. Dan Rather later apologized, for what he called an µerror¶ that millions of people swallowed whole ---but look at it in context with what witness Beverly Oliver has to say: ³Nightmare In Dallas (Starburst Publishers, P.O. Box 4123, Lancaster Pennsylvania 17604) is the story of what happens when a citizen of the United States of America steps forward to tell her story. It is Beverly Oliver's story. Q: I was trying to imagine what it must be like to be Beverly Oliver. Having witnessed one of the greatest tragedies of the Twentieth Century, when you're asked to tell what you saw, and you tell, and are told "No, you didn't see that," isn't that terribly frustrating? A: Well, it is very frustrating, but the most frustrating is that the American public was so gullible for so long. Now they're not nearly as gullible as they were back in the 60's because we're post Watergate, post Iran-Contra, and other problems, and we know our government is less than truthful with us.
Q: Dan Rather has said at C.B.S. that they still consider the J.F.K. Assassination an open case and will always examine new information as it's made available. [Note by JVB: Sixty Minutes tried three times to film me and get my testimony to the people. the founder of Sixty Minutes, Don Hewitt, told C-Span that ³The door was slammed in our faces.´ ]
Don Hewitt wanted to film Baker for Sixty Minutes ´By ignoring the eyewitness testimony of people like yourself, Jean Hill, Ed Hoffman, is Dan Rather saying what you observed isn't important and doesn't count? A: I don't know if a lot of people know about Dan Rather and what happened, right after the assassination. The Zapruder film was viewed by a handful of people, and Dan Rather was the only person of the press allowed to view that footage. He came out and told the rest of the people that President Kennedy's head went violently forward. Anyone who has viewed the Zapruder film knows that the President's head did not go violently forward. From that point on, his career skyrocketed. Q: You're saying because of that statement.... A: He lied. He was part of the cover-up, and he accepted the promises. Q: In all fairness to Dan Rather, he details the watching of that film in his book The Camera Never Blinks. He writes, "Having seen the film once, I had to describe it in detail, live on television, while millions watched. Given the circumstances, I would like to think my description was good. Regrettably, it was not without error, in terms of what was unsaid about the movement of the President's head. I described the forward motion of his head. I failed to mention the violent, backward reaction. This was, as some assassination buffs now argue, a major omission. But certainly not deliberate.´
(JVB: Beverly had some bad things happen to her, such as Gerald Posner acting as if he had interviewed her, and concluding in his book that Oliver was a fake and a fraud: )
Q: How about the introduction of Lee Oswald by Jack Ruby to you? Lee Oswald of the C.I.A. He said that? A: He did. He said this is my friend Lee Oswald. He's with the C.I.A.
Q: Can you positively say that was Lee Oswald? A: I can positively say it was the same man that Jack Ruby killed in the basement of the police station the following Sunday, November 24. It was positively that same man. Now, if that was Lee Harvey Oswald, then yes, that's him. Q: Why do we have all these reports that Lee Oswald didn't go out to nightclubs? A: Well, I don't know because I wasn't the only one who saw him there. There have been several people who have tried to tell people he was in the club. Everyone of them is called a liar or made out to be a drunk. They can't make me out to be a drunk. I was seventeen years old. I didn't drink and still don't drink. What are they gonna do to me? Try to attack my integrity. That's all they can do.
(Note by JVB: Oswald and I went into nightclubs in New Orleans, and yes, he knew Jack Ruby well. I thereby stand at her side to verify the possibility that she could have met Oswald in Ruby¶s nightclub in Dallas. )
Q: Posner goes on to write "Beverly Oliver claimed that Jada (a dancer at Ruby's club) introduced her to Ruby and Oswald over drinks at The Carousel. However, within 2 weeks of the assassination Jada told the F.B.I. that she had never seen Oswald and that she knew of no Ruby Oswald association." Comment? A: The only thing I can tell you about that is that it happened exactly the way I say that it happened. In an article that Gary Cartwright wrote for The Texas Monthly about the Roscoe White (the Dallas police officer) connection to the assassination of President Kennedy, there was a little insert and he's talking about a guy named Bud Shrape who dates Ann Richardson, our former governor of Texas. So, these are not crackpots. These are serious people. He and Bud Shrape are roommates and lived at this apartment. He said he didn't believe in the conspiracy theory before and always believed Oswald did it alone. But then, he became educated. The story was retracting what he had printed back in 75. He said you remember when the girls at The Carousel used to come out and hang around our pool and that real good looking one Jada was around a couple of days after the assassination. She said she was sitting at a table, and Jack Ruby brought Oswald over. They sat down. He introduced him to her and that Beverly Oliver had come over and sat down and had a drink with them and was introduced to him too. That is printed in The Texas Monthly. Q: Beverly, any regrets? A: I'll tell you, there are two things in my lifetime I would change if I could. One of them would be I would not have been on The Grassy Knoll, November 22, 1963. The second thing is I would never have opened [my] mouth. (Ref: http://www.theharbinger.org/xvi/980526/james.html interview by Gary James) Now, you can choose to believe everything the government tells you. Remember that reporters, magazines and newspapers make their living by having access to the powers-that-be, and if they offend, they are not trusted or invited back into the fold.
There is little incentive to make enemies of the government over the Kennedy matter, even though an illegitimate government resulted that took us into several disastrous wars and ruined our economy and our standing in the world as a good and compassionate people. Today, the American media, the American government, the History Channel and its associates, the Sixth Floor Museum, the Sixth Floor Museum board, Vincent Bugliosi, and Gerald Posner, along with FBI, CIA and the Warren Commission official findings, want you to believe their religion. They use movie stars and animators and politicians, TV specials computer animations to feed you their ³religion´ which you are blindly supposed to believe ± that the government did not have Kennedy killed -- every November. That Lyndon Johnson was blameless. The staged µreconstructions,¶ the staged ³rifle experiments,´ etc. that are contrived to convince you -- and those who are America¶s only hope for the future²our youth²to believe these blatant lies. And they make lies about living witnesses, such as me, without hesitation.. In addition, hundreds of statements, files, records and films are being systematically removed from the Internet. They are vanishing before our eyes. Gil jesus¶ fine YouTube films are gone ± they provided convincing film footage of how Oswald was railroaded, lied about and framed. Now they¶re gone ± with various explanations offered. As for me, I have had over 250,000 favorable Google references removed, as well as my accurate and official biography. What¶s left are copies of a libelous Wikipedia biography that Wikipedia refused to correct, mirrored in µencyclopedias¶ on the Internet. When ABC, NBC, The History Channel and others remove ³copyrighted material´ that actually is filmed history, and witness statement evidence that belongs to the American people, they then can rewrite history. Help your country emerge from this illegal and lying position. Help yourself by doing so. If they do this to we who are witnesses while we are still alive, what shall they do after we are dead, and unable to defend ourselves? Or do you prefer to wonder what is true and what is false regarding what the government tells you? Those who killed Kennedy have the power to keep the truth from you²and those who inherited this power got it illegally, through the Coup. THAT is why it¶s a ³national security´ problem. THAT¶s why Oswald MUST be blamed. That¶s why a shot from the front must be covered up, no matter what. Will you help me keep the truth alive? If you care about your country, tell everyone you know the cold, hard truth, before the truth is killed.
I write this in memory of Martha Rose Crow who, with myself, received a death threat a few days before she died, when, in her early fifties, she suddenly collapsed due to a ³heart attack´ though she¶d never had any heart problems. She died soon after posting that I was her ³best friend´ and had placed my website address and the book cover of Me & Lee on all her blogs. She had never previously received any death threats in Europe, where she had been living in exile for over eight years. Her death occurred not long after Dr. James Fetzer interviewed me by telephone, subsequently receiving his first-ever death threat (concerning his 9-11 activities) after doing so. When I went to London later to complete several YouTube interviews for Dr. Fetzer there, I was seriously harassed at the airport, both coming and going. I addition, several important items were stolen from my possession, and a few other events occurred that, should I repeat them, might not be believed. Martha¶s body was cremated against her family¶s wishes before they could arrive from America to order a full autopsy. Police did open a case, but with only ashes to analyze, could do little. I urge you to go to the website -- my website -- that Martha advertised about on her blogs just prior to her death, where even at this date, some six months after her death, you can see ³Judyth Vary Baker is my best friend!´ and my official website address: http://www.judythvarybaker.com. Please tell everyone you know to read the book Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald, which is an honest, open, forthright, and detailed account of my love affair and close association with the innocent accused assassin, Lee H. Oswald. The book depicts things that are embarrassing to me, but which I believe need to be expressed to show the reader the true character and motives of the so-called ³lone nut´ who, in fact, was no such thing. He was a patriot who actually tried to save the President and had to be eliminated and his name blackened to hide those facts, as James Douglass in his excellent book, JFK and the Unspeakable²Why He Died and Why It Matters²explains in poignant and accurate detail. Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free. Thank you for your help and attention to this matter. Judyth Vary Baker, living in exile
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.