You are on page 1of 2

Engineers Guide

Urea Manufacturing Methods

The experiment by Woehler showed that organic chemicals could be prepared from “inorganic”
chemicals. This synthesis of urea in 1828 marks the beginning of synthetic organic chemical
production. Most early plants were built to supply downstream industrial chemical units rather
than to manufacture fertilizer products. The demand for urea as an important fertilizer increased
considerably by the 1960’s by which time any processes for urea manufacture had
become available.

The six major processes for urea production being used in the 60’s were chemico, inventa,
momtecatini, and pechiney-grace, stamicarbon and toyokoastu. Most of these processes were
offered on a once through, partial recycle or total recycle basis. The principal difference
between these propriety processes was the manner in which the ammonia and carbon
dioxide from the ammonia carbamate decomposers were recycled to the urea
synthesis autoclave.

THE MAJOR FEATURES OF THESE PROCESSES ARE DESCRIBED BELOW:

CHEMICO PROCESS:
Chemico’s original recycle process developed in 1955 was based upon the use of
monoethanolamine (MEA) as a selective solvent for separating the CO2 from NH3-CO2
mixture. The purified ammonia was then condensed and recycled decompose the carbamate,
saving steam and cooling water. This process also claimed lower utility costs than processes
utilizing oil slurry or selective solvents.
In later development of the chemico total recycle process, two- urea synthesis autoclaves were
operated in parallel. One reactor as feed, only fresh ammonia and carbon dioxide, while the
other reactor was fed the recycled ammonium carbamate solution. This minimized the effect of
received water and the overall urea conversion to above 60%.

INVENTA PROCESS:
Inventa process included once through, partial recycle and total recycle. A feature of the
process was the use of a special construction material to limit corrosion, and the use of urea
nitrate solution as a selective solvent for separating ammonia in the total recycled version. The
ammonia and carbom dioxide feed ratio between 2 to 3 was fed to autoclave. The effluent from
the autoclave containing urea, water ammonium carbamate and excess carbon dioxide is
flashed in carbamate decomposers. The off gases from these decomposers are absorbed in
urea in urea nitrate solution, which selectively absorb ammonia. This ammonia is stripped from
the solvent and both CO2, NH3 are sent to autoclave in separate streams.

MONTE CATINI PROCESS:


The Fauser-Montecatini process was offered by montecatini, italy. Two methods of liquid
recycle was offered an aqueous recycle scheme and liquid ammonia-recycling scheme. The
advantage of recycling with ammonium carbamate in liquid is that raising the conversion of
ammonium carbamate to urea does not return water to the synthesis autoclave there. In the
aqueous recycle process the pressure employed was 180-200Kg/cm^2g and the temperature
was between 180*c to 190*c. the effluent from the urea synthesis is led down to a medium
pressure of about 21Kg/cm^2g in first stage and close to atmospheric in the second stage of
decomposer. The off gases from the first decomposer consisted mainly of ammonia with
some carbon dioxide, and this was absorbed in water and recycled back to the autoclave in an
aqueous solution. The ammonia and carbon dioxide from the second decomposer were
absorbed in water and this dilute solution used to absorb the gases entering the first absorber.

PECHINEY-GRACE PROCESS:
It was a total recycle scheme. The basic feature of this process was that the ammonium
carbamate was that increasing the conversion of urea did not recycle water to the autoclave,
there. The feed of ammonia and carbon dioxide (in 2:1 mole ratio), along with recycle
ammonium carbamate in a suspension of oil. The oil acted as a heat-balancing medium through
out the process, and also helped to limit corrosion.

STAMI CARBON PROCESS:


Once through, partial recycle and total recycle systems were offered. The total recycle scheme
offered best economy and hence became popular. One feature of the process was the
introduction of a controlled amount of oxygen into the urea synthesis autoclave, limiting
corrosion of the stainless steel. A later development was a two-reactor scheme to minimize the
effect of recycled water on the urea conversion rate.

TOYO KOATSU PROCESS:


Toyo Kotsu built the first Japanese urea plant in 1937, though it was a non-commercial unit. The
recycle process involved recalculating the ammonium carbamate in a water solution.

SNAMPROGETTI PROCESS:
Snamprogetti used the stripping technique to decompose the uncovered carbamate. However
the stripping agent is ammonia instead of CO2. In contrast to the solution recycle processes; the
stripping process originally required a tall structure to accommodate the reactor, stripper
and condenser. This was necessary to ensure the flow of carbamate recycle to the reactor by
gravity.