Fluid Dynamics of Ladle Metallurgy

© All Rights Reserved

2 views

Fluid Dynamics of Ladle Metallurgy

© All Rights Reserved

- Snapshots of Brownian Motion Primer
- Swot Analysis of Tata Steel
- BOF Post Combustion Paper
- Proses Basic Oxygen Furnace
- EXP03 - Gas Diffus - Introdc, Objective, Theory
- Steel Industry pakistan
- Chapter 4 Refractory SteelMaking
- Physical Properties of Milk
- pyrolysis oil machinery comparison
- best practise in industry
- Introduction to Modern Concept of Steel Making Through Induction Furnaces by Stead Fast Engineers
- Velocity in Pipeline for Natural Gas
- 159588
- Basic of Pneumatic
- AWS
- 50658252 Thermodynamics Ppt Notes
- HY14-2500_12-11_Pressure_Control_Valves.pdf
- Density of Gas
- Fluid Characteristics
- Tower q It News Notes

You are on page 1of 7

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272385545

Metallurgy

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.55.1

CITATIONS READS

6 109

3 authors, including:

G. A. Irons

McMaster University

133 PUBLICATIONS 1,418 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by G. A. Irons on 01 January 2016.

ISIJ International, Vol. 55 (2015), No. 1, pp. 1–6

Review

1) Steel Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L7 Canada.

2) Saarstahl Innovation, D-66330, Völklingen, Germany.

(Based on Honorary Member Lecture; held at Tokyo Institute of Technology on March 21, 2014.

Manuscript received September 11, 2014.)

Ladle or secondary metallurgy in steelmaking is an essential process step for the production of high-

quality steel. There has been a vast amount of research conducted in this area, particularly regarding refin-

ing reactions and inclusion chemistry. More recently, the fluid dynamic aspects of the process have been

examined in more detail to provide better control of the process. In this Honorary Lecture two recent

aspects related to fluid dynamics are reviewed; gas-liquid plumes and entrainment of slag droplets in

metal.

in this process.

1. Introduction

Ladle or secondary steelmaking is the process step after

2. Gas-Liquid Plumes

primary steelmaking (BOF or EAF steelmaking) and before

casting, so it is the final opportunity to modify the steel In Ladle Metallurgy, the flow rates are very low, so that

chemistry. Therefore, it is essential that the chemistry in the gas-liquid plume appears as in the water model in Fig.

terms of dissolved elements, and inclusion chemistry and 1. In previous work by the present authors on the dynamics

size distribution be correct. During ladle processing, the of two-phase plumes,1) it was proven that only two dimen-

steel melt is usually stirred by an inert gas such as Argon sionless quantities are required to characterize free-rising

through porous plug(s) fitted in the bottom of the ladle or a plumes as in ladle metallurgy applications. These are the

lance inserted deep into the melt. The purging serves several non-dimensionalized gas flow rate (Q*) and axial height (z*),

purposes viz., homogenizing the melt, flotation of inclu- defined, respectively, as:

sions, enhancing the rates both of refining reactions and dis-

solution of alloying elements and promoting inter-phase Q

Q* = .............................. (1)

interactions in the ladle. g H 2.5

0.5

There has been a large amount of work conducted on var- z ................................... (2)

ious aspects of the fluid dynamics of gas-metal-slag interac- z* =

H

tions relevant to ladle metallurgy. In this Honorary Lecture

I have chosen to review two works in my group that provide where Q is the gas flow rate, H is the metal height, z is the

some new insight into the industrial processes:

1. The first is a model of gas-liquid plumes that provides

a relatively simple way to calculate the gas void fraction,

gas-liquid plume area, and the gas and liquid velocities. The

model is important because it shows that the modified

Froude number, previously used for such studies is not rel-

evant, but that a plume Froude number is the appropriate

group for dynamic similarity. It also clarifies that the type

and diameter of injector is largely irrelevant and that the

gas-liquid density ratio is not important.

2. The second is a study, still underway, to determine the

extent of entrainment of slag droplets into steel during gas

stirring. This has been an unresolved issue for over 30 years,

and this work is providing details of the important variables

* Corresponding author: E-mail: ironsga@mcmaster.ca Fig. 1. Photograph of a water model of a gas-liquid plume, similar

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.55.1 to ladle metallurgy stirring.

1 © 2015 ISIJ

ISIJ International, Vol. 55 (2015), No. 1

vertical position and g is the gravitational acceleration. It all the major plume parameters to Q* and z* on a fundamen-

was also proven that the proper form of the Froude number tal basis.1) In this framework, the similarity parameters for

relevant to Ladle Metallurgy is the plume Froude number, the void fraction, plume radius, liquid and gas velocities,

based on the liquid or plume velocity as the relevant veloc- respectively are:

ity and the bath height as the characteristic dimension:

( ) (z )

0.63 −1.57

α = 1.13 Q* *

..................... (5)

U2

FrP = l ................................ (3)

α gH

( ) (z )

Rp 0.2 0.5

R*p = = 0.65 Q* *

.................. (6)

The plume Froude number arose from the non-dimensional- H

ization of the equation for momentum in the free-rising part

of the plume. In that study the plume Froude number was

( ) (z )

Ul 0.32 −0.28

Ul* = = 1.16 Q* *

.............. (7)

mathematically related to Q*:1) gH

( )

FrP = Φ Q* , z* ............................ (4)

( ) (z )

Ug 0.37 −0.43

Therefore, dynamic similarity is achieved by matching U g* = = 3.52 Q* *

.............. (8)

gH

either Frp or Q* and z* in the plume. It is more convenient

to use Q* because it contains variables that are set by the where the overbar indicates that the quantity is averaged

operator. over the plume cross-section and the superscript * indicates

Further, by using the mathematical descriptions of two- that that the variable is non-dimensional.

phase systems, viz., the well-known Eulerian-Lagrangian or The model was also extended to mixing times, tm (the

bubble tracking models and momentum and continuity for time to achieve a particular degree of chemical homogene-

the phases, a similarity framework was developed to correlate ity, 95% in this case) as a function of gas injection rate:2)

Fig. 2. Similarity representation of the plume void fraction (a), plume radius (b), liquid velocity (c), gas velocity (d) and

mixing time (e). The letters in the figures refer to the source of the data, explained in the original Refs. 2) and 3).

Equation (39) in Fig. 2(e) is Eq. (9) in this text.

© 2015 ISIJ 2

ISIJ International, Vol. 55 (2015), No. 1

( ) (R )

g −0.31 2

t = tm

*

m = 82.4 Q* *

............... (9) models are not sufficiently tested due to the difficulty in

H measuring entrainment parameters even in aqueous models.

Where R* is the dimensionless vessel radius: The purpose of the current work is to use multiphase

computational fluid dynamics to simulate slag entrainment

R

R* = ................................. (10) and obtain estimates for number and size of droplets formed

H so that the interfacial area for slag metal reaction rates can

The equations in this model, Eqs. (5) to (9), have been com- be calculated. The results from the present study will be

pared with all available data in Fig. 2. Further details are used in a model under development to calculate mass trans-

contained in other references.2,3) It is clear that there is fer rates. The fluid flow equations are solved using the

remarkably good agreement between the model and data Large Eddy Simulation (LES) approach. However, since it

over a wide range of conditions. It should also be noted that is computationally very intensive to perform large eddy sim-

the model is entirely self-consistent which means that the ulations for the entire ladle, only a thin slice of the ladle

variables scale properly, according to plume Froude number domain is considered, as shown in Fig. 4.

similarity. Refs. 2) and 3) further argue that because the

modified Froude number (widely used in gas injection stud- 3.1. Mathematical Model Description

ies) and the specific energy input should not be used in ladle The multiphase large eddy simulations were carried out

metallurgy applications because they do not conform to using Gerris Flow Solver, an Open source CFD package.10)

plume Froude number similarity. For a given boundary conditions viz. geometry of the

domain, inlet and outlet conditions, Gerris calculates fluid

flow in the domain by solving the incompressible Navier-

3. Entrainment of Slag Droplets into Steel

Stokes equation with gravity and surface tension terms. By

The two-phase plume of gas and liquid steel that was using the Volume of Fluid method, it tracks the interface

described in the previous section rises to the surface, and between two immiscible phases. The governing equations

creates a raised spout of steel that pushes the slag layer radi- are as follows:

ally leaving an exposed metal portion known as an “open

Momentum conservation:

eye”, as shown in Fig. 3. The relative motion between the

G

slag and the outflowing metal causes instability in the slag ⎛ ∂U G G⎞ G G G

metal interface and leads to droplet formation beyond a crit- ρm ⎜ (

+ U ⋅∇U ⎟ = −∇P + ∇ ⋅ μm ∇U + g + σκδ n )

⎝ ∂t ⎠

ical velocity, known as entrainment. Such an entrainment

.........................................(11)

process leads to increased slag-metal interfacial area that in G

turn increases the interfacial mass transfer rates for refining where, U is the velocity field to be obtained, ρm and μm are

G

reactions such as desulphurization, but could potentially the mixture density and viscosity respectively, g is gravita-

lead to slag entrainment in the product. tional acceleration, σ is the surface tension coefficient, κ is

There has been a substantial amount of work on the effect the radius of curvature, δ is the Kronecker delta which is

G

of entrainment on mass transfer in industrial trials and in unity at the interface, otherwise zero, and n is the unit nor-

water modelling. There is a sudden increase in mass transfer mal vector to the two fluid interface.

rate at a certain gas injection rate.4) Since it is impossible to

Incompressibility condition:

see in liquid metal systems, water modelling has been used G

to identify the critical gas flow rate to be at the onset of ∂U G

+ ∇ ⋅ U = 0 ........................... (12)

entrainment of upper phase into the lower. Currently, there ∂t

is no quantitative link between the entrainment conditions in

the system and the rate of refining. Many attempts have VOF advection equation:

been made in the past to characterize this degree of entrain-

∂F G

ment, most of which are limited to finding the critical con- + U ⋅∇F = 0 .......................... (13)

∂t

where F is the volume fraction field defined as 1 for upper

phase, 0 for lower phase and for interface between 0 and 1.

Fig. 4. (a) Schematic of thin slice of fluid domain in the ladle, con-

Fig. 3. Schematic of gas stirred ladle and flow features causing sidered for the Large Eddy Simulations. (b) Nomenclature

entrainment of slag into metal around the eye region. of various boundaries of the LES domain.

3 © 2015 ISIJ

ISIJ International, Vol. 55 (2015), No. 1

Gerris does not have any turbulence model; it was imple- Table 1. Summary of simulation parameters that are dependent on

mented by the present authors; further details are else- gas injection rate.

where.11) Specific Gas Injection Rate, (STP)lpm/ton 2 4 8

In Gerris, the grid is generated automatically, although

Gas Injection Rate at half bath height, lpm 355 710 1 421

based on user defined criteria, into quadtree (in 2D) or

octree (in 3D) discretization that can be adaptively refined Radius of Slag Eye, m 0.34 0.45 0.60

based on user criteria. As a result, for multiphase problems Slag Thickness during operation, cm 11.3 12.5 15.4

like entrainment that involves wide range of spatial scales,

the total number of grid points can be decreased by an order

of magnitude by adaptively refining only at the interface Table 2. List of cases of simulations performed. The table has

three, 3-by-3 matrices of cases, one for each gas injection

between two phases. The adaptation can be performed every

rate; the moderate gas injection rate has all possible cases,

time step with little computational overhead (< 5%). Another whereas the other matrices have only the diagonal cases.

feature in Gerris is that by coupling the so called ‘balance-

force continuum-surface-force surface-tension’ method and Q, lpm/ton 2 4 8

the height function method to estimate interface curvature, σ , N/m → 0.25 0.5 1.0 0.25 0.5 1.0 0.25 0.5 1.0

it has been possible to achieve exact balance between sur- μ , Pa.s ↓

face tension and pressure gradient. This assures better rep-

0.055 10 1 2 3 13

resentation of interfaces than offered by many other flow

solvers. Since the phenomena are not wall dominated, no 0.11 11 4 5 6 14

wall treatment was applied to the LES model. 0.22 12 7 8 9 15

The location of the inlet and the outflow planes are

marked in Fig. 4(b). The height of the inlet was always set

to the slag thickness. The inlet condition for the LES is the is close to lime saturation. Although there is no specific data

velocity field at the location of the inlet plane in the ladle. on interfacial tension for this slag, various studies for differ-

It is unnecessary and prohibitively expensive to perform ent slag-metal combinations have shown that equilibrium

LES on the whole ladle; however, the proper turbulent interfacial tension values vary somewhere between 0.6 and

conditions need to be specified at the inlet plane. These 1.4 N/m.14–16) Moreover, Gaye et al.14) have shown that a

conditions were extracted from a Reynolds-Averaged high flux of oxygen atoms transferred across the interface

Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation for the entire ladle, as could drop the interfacial tension to virtually zero. Consid-

they are relatively inexpensive. These computations are ering these facts, a low value of 0.5 N/m was taken to be

called the “precursor RANS simulations”. Still, the time- the base case and two others were obtained by halving and

averaged velocity field obtained from a RANS simulation is doubling this value. The density of the slag was taken to be

insufficient, as an appropriate inlet condition should also 2 800 kg/m3. Table 1 summarizes the ladle conditions that

have the fluctuating components that are characteristic of are flow rate dependent.

turbulence. The fluctuating components were ‘synthesized’ To study the role of viscosity and interfacial tension, sep-

by employing the ‘Synthetic Eddy Method’ (SEM) of Jarrin arately, 9 simulations were performed at moderate gas injec-

et al.,12) as described elsewhere.11) tion rate of 4 lpm/ton. At the other two gas injection rates,

3 simulations were performed for each, by simultaneously

3.2. Cases Simulated increasing the slag viscosity and the interfacial tension. In

All ladle operating parameters for the simulations corre- all these simulations, slag thickness was taken to be the

spond to a ladle of 2 m diameter, steel bath height of 2 m nominal thickness of 0.1 m. However during ladle opera-

at a melt temperature of 1 600°C. The nominal slag thick- tion, when the slag eye forms and its size increases with gas

ness was taken to be 0.1 m to give a slag to steel height ratio injection rate, the slag thickness also increases. The values

of 1/20. A thin slice of thickness 0.1 m was considered for calculated based on volume continuity are summarised in

the LES domain. The length and the depth of the domain Table 1. So 9 more cases that are along the diagonals of sub

were 0.6 m, sufficiently large to avoid wall effects and to matrices in Table 2, were performed for slag thicknesses

also prevent droplets being drained down the outflow, that vary with gas injection rate.

before being counted. The height of the inlet was the same

as the thickness of slag and therefore varied with the slag 3.3. LES Results

thickness. Three specific gas injection rates were chosen This section discusses the results of simulations including

based on the industrial range, 2, 4 and 8 standard litres per only droplets of diameter greater than 4 mm. Various fea-

minute per ton (slpm/ton) of steel that gives 355, 710 and tures of deformation of the slag metal interface are shown

1 421 lpm at half bath height and 1 600°C. Here 4 slpm/ton in Fig. 5 in two views of same snapshot of simulation for

is the base case value and the others obtained by halving and Case-13.

doubling the base value. Three slag viscosities were consid- Entrainment Rate is defined as the number of slag drop-

ered, again by halving and doubling the base case value of lets entrained per second. Figures 6(a) and 6(b) show the

0.11 Pa.s. This value was calculated using the National variation of entrainment rate with slag-metal interfacial ten-

Physical Laboratory model for slag of 40% Al2O3–40% sion and slag viscosity at gas injection rate of 4 lpm/ton and

CaO–10% SiO2–10% MgO, a typical composition of ladle slag thickness of 0.1 m. An increase of either of the fluid

desulphurization slags.13) A value of 0.22 Pa.s corresponds properties decreases the entrainment rate, although interfa-

to a slag of 30% Al2O3–50% CaO–10% SiO2–10%MgO that cial tension has more effect than the slag viscosity. So the

© 2015 ISIJ 4

ISIJ International, Vol. 55 (2015), No. 1

Fig. 5. (a) Side view and (b) perspective view of slag-metal inter-

Fig. 8. Sauter mean droplet diameter for various slag viscosity and

face in a same simulation snapshot, showing various inter-

slag metal interfacial tension (σ ).

face deformation features like waves, ligaments and droplets.

Repeating the procedure at various time steps and taking the

average of these, the average bulk velocity of liquid steel

near the slag metal interface was calculated. An interesting

feature in Fig. 7(a) is the convergence of all the curves to a

point where entrainment rate is zero for a finite gas injection

rate.Fitting of first order exponential decay to the curves in

Fig. 7(a) yields flow rates of 1.44 to 1.65 slpm/ton. From the

simulation results the steel velocity for such cases is 0.50 to

Fig. 6. (a) Plots of entrainment rate versus slag-metal interfacial

0.52 m/s; further details have been previously presented.11)

tension for various slag viscosities at Q = 4 lpm/ton and hU =

0.1 m. (b) Same values of entrainment rate as in (a) replot- These values are close to the value of 0.5 m/s estimated by

ted against slag viscosity for various interfacial tension val- Krishnapisharody and Irons17) using their model based on

ues. Kelvin-Helmholtz instability criterion for the onset of

entrainment, although for a very thin slag of 3.0 cm thick-

ness.

The Sauter mean diameter (D32) estimated from a particle

size distribution with discrete size classes is defined as,18)

D32 =

∑ ( fD3 ) , .......................... (14)

∑ ( fD2 )

where f is the distribution frequency and D is the particle

diameter. This averaging was chosen because the particle

Fig. 7. Entrainment versus gas injection rate for simulation cases

with the Sauter mean diameter will have the same ratio of

with (a) constant slag thickness (b) slag thickness that vary volume to surface area as the entire ensemble of droplets,18)

with gas injection rate. which is very relevant to the role of entrainment in slag

metal interfacial mass transfer. The Sauter mean diameter

calculated for the cases 1 to 9 in Table 2 are plotted as his-

resistance to entrainment is a function of both interfacial togram in Fig. 8; these cases have constant gas injection rate

tension and slag viscosity. but varying fluid properties. The absence of any systematic

The results of the cases in the diagonal of the sub-matrices difference among these cases indicates that slag viscosity

in Table 2, are plotted in Figs. 7(a) and 7(b). Figure 7(a) and slag-metal interfacial tension do not significantly affect

contains the results of simulations for the constant slag the droplet sizes.

thickness and Fig. 7(b) contains the results of simulations

with slag thicknesses that vary with gas injection rate. The 3.4. Discussion

cases with constant slag thickness exhibit an asymptotic To the authors’ knowledge this is the first time in ladle

increase of entrainment rate with gas injection rate, for var- metallurgy a high resolution simulation was performed for

ious fluid properties. These cases do not fully include the slag entrainment by applying relevant fluid flow conditions

effect of gas injection rate due to their constant slag thick- existing in a full scale gas stirred ladle. This was possible

ness, but are good to study the effect of flow velocity near due to the adaptive refinement feature and the accurate sur-

the slag-metal interface. On the other hand the cases with face tension model of Gerris and the ability to generate tur-

variable slag thickness show ever increasing entrainment bulent inlet conditions using the synthetic eddy method.

rate. Furthermore, the present approach was compared with drop-

The average velocity of steel flow near the slag metal let break-up in a water model of the slag-metal interface17)

interface was calculated by volume averaging the norm of and found to be in reasonable agreement. Unfortunately, it

5 © 2015 ISIJ

ISIJ International, Vol. 55 (2015), No. 1

would be very difficult to validate the present work against complete, and that with better understanding we may be able

real slag-metal systems due to the difficulty in making such to improve ladle metallurgy processes.

measurements.

The present work provides some insight into the important REFERENCES

variable influencing the creation of slag droplets which in a 1) K. Krishnapisharody and G. A. Irons: ISIJ Int., 50 (2010), 1413.

qualitative sense has been linked to increased rates of mass 2) K. Krishnapisharody and G. A. Irons: Materials Processing Towards

Properties, Seetharaman Seminar, Jernkontoret, Stockholm, (2010),

transfer.4) As discussed earlier, Fig. 7(a) shows that the onset 317.

of droplet formation velocities are consistent with the Kelvin- 3) K. Krishnapisharody and G. A. Irons: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 44B

Helmholtz instability as Krishnapisharody17) found in water (2013), 1486.

4) J. Ishida, K. Yamaguchi, S. Sugiura, K. Yamano, S. Hayakawa and

models and simple VOF codes. The computational results N. Demukai: Denki-Seiko (Electric Furnace Steel), 52 (1981), 2

demonstrate that the entrainment rate is very sensitive to the (Cited in S. Asai, I. Muchi and M. Kawachi, Fluid Flow and Mass

Transfer in Gas Stirred Ladles, Foundry Processes, Their Physics

interfacial tension between slag and metal, compared to slag and Chemistry, Plenum Press, New York, (1988), 261).

viscosity. This is a completely new finding. 5) J. Mietz, S. Schneider and F. Oeters: Steel Res., 62 (1991), 10.

6) S-H. Kim, R. J. Fruehan and R. I. L. Guthrie: Steelmaking Conf.

Proc., Iron and Steel Society, Warrendale, PA, (1987), 107.

7) M. Iguchi, Y. Sumida, R. Okada and Z. Morita: ISIJ Int., 34 (1994),

4. Conclusions 164.

8) K. Krishnapisharody and G. A. Irons: EPD Congress 2008, The

This paper is a brief review of some of the work that high- Mineral, Metals and Material Society, Warrendale, PA, (2008), 293.

lights the importance of fluid dynamic phenomena in ladle 9) J. Mietz, S. Schneider and F. Oeters: Steel Res., 62 (1991), 1.

metallurgy. The plume dynamics are dominated by balance 10) Gerris Flow Solver, http://gfs.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_

Page, (accessed 2014-01-10).

between the buoyancy of the plume and inertia of the liquid; 11) A. Senguttuvan and G. Irons: AISTech2014 Proc., Association of

thus, ladle Froude number similarity is achieved. For these Iron and Steel Technology, Warrendale, PA, (2014), 1453.

12) N. Jarrin, R. Prosser, J.-C. Uribe, S. Benhamadouche and D. Laurence:

phenomena, interfacial phenomena at the injector inlet or at Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 30 (2009), 435.

the gas-liquid interfaces are of secondary importance. How- 13) J. Ekengard, A. M. T. Andersson and P. G. Jonsson: Ironmaking

Steelmaking, 35 (2008), 575.

ever, for the issues related to slag-metal interactions, the 14) H. Gaye, L. D. Lucas, M. Olette and P. V. Riboud: Can. Metall. Q.,

physical properties of the slag, particularly, the interfacial 23 (1984), 179.

tension, are of prime importance. These issues are very dif- 15) I. Jimbo, Y. Chung and A. W. Cramb: ISIJ Int., 36 (1996), S42.

16) S. C. Park, H. Gaye and H. G. Lee: Ironmaking Steelmaking, 36

ficult to investigate in full-scale systems, so the present (2009), 3.

approach with computational fluid dynamics may continue 17) K. Krishnapisharody: PhD Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton,

Canada, (2006).

to improve our understanding of these phenomena. It is also 18) Sauter Mean Diameter, http://www.thermopedia.com/content/1108/,

clear that our understanding of these phenomena is far from (accessed 2014-01-10).

© 2015 ISIJ 6

- Snapshots of Brownian Motion PrimerUploaded byFrank Munley
- Swot Analysis of Tata SteelUploaded bykausysnitdgp4582
- BOF Post Combustion PaperUploaded byAvs Ramachandra
- Proses Basic Oxygen FurnaceUploaded byRafa Muadz
- EXP03 - Gas Diffus - Introdc, Objective, TheoryUploaded byHattori Kun
- Steel Industry pakistanUploaded byhelperforeu
- Chapter 4 Refractory SteelMakingUploaded byMari Matz
- Physical Properties of MilkUploaded byMohammad Ashraf Paul
- pyrolysis oil machinery comparisonUploaded bysrscribd10
- best practise in industryUploaded byknsaravana
- Introduction to Modern Concept of Steel Making Through Induction Furnaces by Stead Fast EngineersUploaded byStead Fast Engineers Pvt Ltd
- Velocity in Pipeline for Natural GasUploaded byNakkolop
- 159588Uploaded bySharat Chandra
- Basic of PneumaticUploaded byPaul
- AWSUploaded byMahmoud Elemam
- 50658252 Thermodynamics Ppt NotesUploaded bysaranyababy
- HY14-2500_12-11_Pressure_Control_Valves.pdfUploaded byPartsGopher.com
- Density of GasUploaded bySelGowri
- Fluid CharacteristicsUploaded byFarahain Idrus
- Tower q It News NotesUploaded bysahj
- models.plasma.thermal_plasma.pdfUploaded bynimavaz
- FuelsUploaded bySavindra Silva
- Cooler 171110 (r0) Seleccion de Enfriador y Calculo Tlr-4225-uUploaded byloreto
- 435-report.pdfUploaded bySomdeb Bandopadhyay
- Measurement and simulation of the two-phase velocity correlation in sudden-expansion gas--particle flows_2.pdfUploaded byWageeh El-Askary
- Q5Uploaded byAbdullah Helmi
- SCIENCE TEST.docxUploaded byMaximiliano Alexi
- 5 Phases of MatterUploaded byroven desu
- Ingles TraucUploaded byZexar Altebo Villar
- Topic 1 QuantitativeUploaded bymanurulez_21

- Kalman -- A New Approach to Linear Filtering, etc. (1960)Uploaded byDerek O'Connor
- Fans & Blowers-Calculation of PowerUploaded byPramod B.Wankhade
- Fan Performance and SelectionUploaded byinam758388
- Understanding fanUploaded bypinenamu
- NALCO corrosionmanual72Uploaded byDiego Alexander B
- Fans Blowers GuideUploaded byMohammed Shafi Ahmed
- Understanding Fan Curves FE 2000Uploaded bycyoser
- Kalman filterUploaded bypinenamu
- ANSYS Fluent Tutorial Guide(Ver.15.0)Uploaded byhull
- Understanding the basics of packaged steam generatorsUploaded bykichas
- Kalman 1Uploaded bypinenamu
- Steam Turbine Performance and Condition Monitoring PDFUploaded bypinenamu
- 201203_Maximizing-Sinter-Plant-Heat-Recovery.pdfUploaded bypinenamu
- Flowmaster v7.0 Easy GuideUploaded bypinenamu
- Boiler Tube FailuresUploaded bysen_subhasis_58
- 2Uploaded byTran Khac Truong
- Steam Generator Tube FailuresUploaded bypinenamu
- Vpi-45 Fluid Dynamics of Gas Side- HRSGUploaded byLTE002
- 1_Boiler Tube FailuresUploaded byMohamad Eshra
- GE Advance Material and CoatingUploaded bykhunplatt
- A REVIEW OF GAS-GAS HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEMSUploaded bypinenamu
- entropy-14-00599Uploaded bykoustavghosh1986
- Heat exchangers-Sadık KakaçUploaded byBabbare Voltaire
- Waste heat recovery boilerUploaded bypinenamu
- ie50184a024Uploaded bypinenamu
- Process Heat Transfer - D.Q. KernUploaded byapi-3733275

- Propagasi Gelombang RadioUploaded byRizkita Kurnia Putri
- AIEEE Previous Paper 2011deUploaded byNivitha Moorthy
- Lap vs ConcentricUploaded byAmr Diaa El-Din El-Fawal
- Thrust Force Analysis of Tripod Constant Velocity Joint Using Multibody ModelUploaded bybee140676
- Chapter18 Student 2Uploaded byPuteri Nur Shaheerah
- Field Wiring and Noise Considerations for Analog SignalsUploaded byfarmcorp
- FreeOCR NotesUploaded byYasir Munir
- Erosion 1 (14)Uploaded byShaheen S. Ratnani
- Multiple IntegralUploaded byAnkur Singh
- A Vector Controlled Axial-Flux Seven-Phase Machine in Fault OperationUploaded byMostafa8425
- Experimental validation of dynamic simulation of the flat plate collector.pdfUploaded byAbubakkar Siddiq
- Interim Report Final VersionUploaded bysteve
- P241 General Physics LabUploaded byVivek Singh
- Rotational Kinema TicsUploaded bygirithik14
- Proteccion Electrostatica 8000-Sb001 -En-pUploaded byronaldxmen
- XC Tension StiffeningUploaded byLuis C. Pérez Tato
- Articulo science directUploaded byAnonymous 6wbdrJc
- 19980048420Uploaded byKumar Abhishek
- Coaching 150 Pipe UpUploaded byrobert carbungco
- Automatic Spring Rolling Machine111Uploaded bysrajaprojects
- Shear Force Full ReportUploaded byMoganraj
- rpp2016-Chin.Phys.C.40.100001Uploaded bykwangdid
- Matlab CodeUploaded byAvinash Singh
- Chapter 4- TransformersUploaded byMohammedSaadaniHassani
- Liquid Crystals.pptUploaded byvarundasjh
- Mao on SakataUploaded byborn91j
- Applications of Vector analysis & PDEsUploaded bymasood
- CFD Project ReportUploaded byAnderson Oliveira
- gauravUploaded bygrv.agrwl1212
- Flight Control Design Using Backstepping.pdfUploaded byIvan Ramirez