A

Summary Report
ON ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
OWNER: BISNHNU MAYA TAMANG
LOCATION: KHADKA BHADRAKALI-5, KATHMANDU
Contents Page No.
1. SALIENT FEATURE OF THE BUILDING ....................................................... 1
2. Introduction .................................................................................................... 2
3. Design Considerations .................................................................................. 3
A) Methodology..................................................................................................................................... 3
B) Design Codes and Standards ............................................................................................................. 3
C) Design Loads and Forces ................................................................................................................... 3
a) Dead Loads .................................................................................................................................... 3
b) Live loads....................................................................................................................................... 4
c) Seismic Load .................................................................................................................................. 4
D) Load Cases and Load Combinations.................................................................................................. 5
4. Structural Analysis and Design .................................................................... 6
A) Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 6
a) Analysis Output Details: ................................................................................................................ 6
B) Design................................................................................................................................................ 8
a) Design of structural components.................................................................................................. 8
5. Conclusion .................................................................................................... 22
6. ANNEXES ...................................................................................................... 23
C) COLUMN REBAR DETAILS ................................................................................................................ 23
D) BEAM REBAR DETAILS ..................................................................................................................... 25
E) AXIAL FORCE DIAGRAM (1.5DL+1.5LL)............................................................................................ 28
F) DEFORMED SHAPE .......................................................................................................................... 29
G) BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM ....................................................................................................... 32
H) STOREY SHEAR ................................................................................................................................ 33
1. SALIENT FEATURE OF THE BUILDING
A) General Features:
Project:
Location:
Plinth Area:
B) Architectural Features:
Type of Building:
Number of Storey:
Height of 1st storey:
Height of upper storeys:
Height of top storey:
Total height of the building:
Wall and partitions:
C) Structural Features:
Structural system:
Foundation type:
Columns:
Beams:
Slab:
D) Geotechnical Features:
Soil Type:
Seismic Zone:
Allowable Bearing Capacity:
E) Materials:
Concrete:
Steel:
1|Page
Residential Building
Khadka Bhadrakali-5, Kathmandu
775.46 sq. ft.
Residential
3
9’-4”
9’-4”
9’-4”
28’-0”
9” th. and 4” th.
RC Framed Structure
Isolated Footings
Square columns 12”x12”
Foundation Beams 9”x12”
Plinth Tie Beams 9”x12”
Main Beams 14”x 9”
5” th. RC floor slab
5” th. RC stair waist slab
II (As per IS 13290: 2002)
V (As per IS 1893: 2002)
150 KN/m2 (Assumed)
M20 for Beam and Slab
M20 for Column
Fe 500 for longitudinal bars
Fe 500 for confinement bars
2. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to summarize design assumption, methodology and follow up of codes and
standards, the design criteria and practices that have been used in structural analysis and design calculation
of the proposed Residential building at Khadka Bhadrakali-5, Kathmandu. These criterias form the basis of
the design for various structural components of the building. Detailed structural designs and working
drawings are prepared considering safety, serviceability and economy as prime concern of the structural
design. The design also imply earthquake resistivity governed as per IS code and Nepal NBC.
The design methodology used is ‘Limit State Method’ and can be emphasized as ‘Earthquake Resistant RC
Framed Structure Design’. For the proper performance of the building as per design, precautions shall be
taken from initial construction phase to quality control during construction and during services that in no
case it would violate any design assumption.
Moreover, the building is modeled and designed as a Residential Building without considering the stiffness
of the infill walls.

2|Page
3. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
A) METHODOLOGY
The structure has been designed by Limit State Method based on “Plain and Reinforced Concrete, Code of
Practice, India and Nepal National Building Code, Nepal”. The acceptable theories and experiences are
taken into account to assure the design for safety and durability. However, the calculations alone do not
produce safe, serviceable and durable structures but quality of materials, proper detailing and good
supervision are equally important.

B) DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS

The structural calculation of this building shall be in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations of
the Government of Nepal, and its referral to any other standards. A summary of the codes and standards
used in structural analysis and design is listed below.
1. IS:875-1987 (Part 1), Code of practice for design loads in Building and structure-Dead loads,
Bureau of Indian standards, New delhi,1989
2. IS:875-1987 (Part 2), Code of practice for design loads in building and structure-Dead loads, Bureau
of Indian standards, New delhi,1989
3. IS:1893- (Part I)-2002, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design structure Bureau of Indian
standards, New delhi,1986
4. Design of reinforced concrete structure-IS 456-2000
5. Ductility design for earthquake resistant structure IS13920
6. Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal, Nepal NBC105
7. Mandatory rules of thumb, RC buildings without masonry infill, Nepal NBC 205

C) DESIGN LOADS AND FORCES

Design loads for all structures have been in accordance to the criteria described below. The structure has
been designed considering following dead loads:
a) Dead Loads
1. 9” th. wall + 0.5” th. plaster on both sides without opening = 12.168 KN/m
2. 9” th. wall + 0.5” th. plaster on both sides with 30% opening = 8.517 KN/m
3. 4” th. wall + 0.5” th. plaster on both sides without opening = 6.019 KN/m2
4. 4” th. wall + 0.5” th. plaster on both sides with 30% opening = 4.213 KN/m2
5. 4” th. and 3.5’ high parapet wall = 2.580 KN/m
6. Floor finishes = 1.00 KN/m2
(Note: Dead load of slabs, beams and columns are calculated by the program itself.)

Unit weight of materials:

1. Reinforced concrete (RCC) = 25 KN/m3
2. Plain Cement Concrete (PCC) = 24 KN/m3
3. Steel = 78.5KN/m3
4. Brick Masonry = 19 KN/m3
5. Sand filling = 18 KN/m3
6. Unit weight of soil = 16 KN/m3

3|Page
 b) Live loads
1. Room = 2 KN/m2
2. Toilet = 2 KN/m2
3. Balcony = 3 KN/m2
4. Staircase = 3 KN/m2

c) Seismic Load
The site location is on high seismic risk as per seismic hazard map of Nepal. Equivalently it is
on Zone-V (IS seismic hazard map). For this zone the expected peak ground acceleration is
0.36g, in 100 yr peak ground acceleration return period (Basu and Nigam, 1978). Depending
upon this data, seismic load calculation has been made and distribution done for this structure
by LINEAR STATIC OR SEISMIC COFFICIENT METHOD.

i. Calculation of design Spectra and Lateral Force Coefficients

(As per IS 1893 (Part I):2002, Clause 6.4)
The design horizontal seismic coefficient Ah for a structure is determined by the following
expression (IS 1893 (Part I):2002):
Z I Sa
Ah =
2Rg
Where, Z = Zone factor
I = Importance factor, depending upon the functional use of structure
R = Response reduction factor, depending on the perceived seismic damage
performance of the structure, characterized by ductile or brittle
deformations.
Sa
= Average response acceleration coefficient
g
Here, For the given project,
Height of the building (h) = 8.534 m (28’-0”)
Time Period (T) = 0.075 x h0.75 = 0.374 s
Zone Factor (Z) = 0.36 (for zone 5)
Importance factor (I) = 1.0
Response Reduction Factor (R) = 5.0

ii. Vertical Distribution of Base Shear to Different Floor Level

The design base shear (VB ) shall be distributed along the height of the building as per the
following expression:
Wi h2i
Qi = VB n
∑j=1 Wj h2j
Where, Qi = Design Lateral force at floor i
Wi = Seismic weight of floor i, (DL+0.25 LL, if LL< 3 KN/m2)
(DL+0.5 LL, if LL>3 KN/m2)
Hi = Height of floor i measured from base, and
N = Number of storey in the building is the number of levels at which the masses
are located.
The seismic weight of building, calculation and distribution of base shear are allowed to
calculate by software itself and the time period is given manually calculated as per IS 1893: Cl
7.6.1. i.e.
Ta = 0.075 h0.75 Where, h = Height of the building, in m.

4|Page
D) LOAD CASES AND LOAD COMBINATIONS
In the analysis, following load cases have been considered.
1. Dead Load (DL)
2. Live Load (LL)
3. Earthquake Load in + ve X-Direction (EQX)
4. Earthquake Load in + ve Y-Direction (EQY)
In the limit state design of reinforced concrete structure, the following load combinations are accounted as
per IS 1893 (Part I): 2002.
1. 1.5(DL + LL)
2. 1.2(DL + LL ± EL)
3. 1.5(DL ± EL)
4. 0.9DL ± 1.5EL

5|Page
4. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
A) ANALYSIS

A three dimensional linear analysis has been carried out using the standard software ETABS V16.0.3. The
structure is assumed to be fixed at the plinth level. The brick wall is considered as the filler wall only. The
beams are modeled as rectangular beams. The flange effect of the beams has been neglected. Center to
center dimension of the structure has been considered. The floor diaphragms are assumed to be rigid. The
method of analysis used in the given project is Seismic Coefficient method.

Fig.: 3D Model of the Building

a) Analysis Output Details:

i. Base Shear:
The base shear (Vb) as calculated by ETABS V16.0.3 is given in the table below:
Table: Calculation of base shear
Lumped
Load Time Period Coeff. Used Base Shear
Direction Mass (W),
Pattern (T), sec (Vb), KN
KN
EQX X 0.44 0.09 1637.8589 147.4073
EQY Y 0.44 0.09 1637.8589 147.4073

6|Page
 ii. Storey Drift:
As per Clause no. 7.11.1 of IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002, the storey drift in any storey due to specified
design lateral force with partial load factor of 1.0, shall not exceed 0.004 times the storey height.
Storey drift on the buildings for earthquake in x and y-directions are tabulated below in tables below:
Table: Storey drift (EQX)
Storey
Storey Drift (%)
Storey Displacement(mm)
Storey
height (m) X-Dir Y-Dir X-Dir Y-Dir
Max Max Max Max

Storey 3 9.333 14.000 1.300 0.000 0.000

Storey 2 9.333 10.700 1.200 0.001 0.000
Storey 1 9.333 4.700 0.500 0.001 0.000

Table: Storey drift (EQY)

Storey Drift (mm) Storey Drift (%)
Storey
Storey 1 2 1 2
height (m)
Max Max Max Max

Storey 3 9.333 0.100 9.600 0.000 0.000

Storey 2 9.333 0.100 7.200 0.000 0.000
Storey 1 9.333 0.046 3.400 0.000 0.000

iii. Modal Load Participation Ratios:

The modal load participation ratios are greater than 90% for both UX and UY as shown in the table
below. Hence, O.K.
Table: Modal Load Participation Ratios
Output Case Item Type Item Static (%) Dynamic (%)
MODAL Acceleration UX 100 100
MODAL Acceleration UY 100 100

7|Page
B) DESIGN
The design of the members has been done as per philosophy of limit state method. For the design of the
members IS 456:2000 and design aid SP 16 has been used extensively.
Footings have been designed for vertical loads developed at the base due to unfactored dead load and live
load only and it is assumed that the moments at base are solely resisted by tie beams at plinth level and
foundation level (double tie beams). Isolated footings have been adopted for ground load transfer.
Longitudinal reinforcement in columns has been calculated based on critical load combination among the
load combinations adopted. A symmetric arrangement of the reinforcement has been adopted from seismic
point of view that reversal of stresses may occur. Longitudinal reinforcement in beams is also based on
critical load combination. It is calculated from the envelope of bending moment diagram. Spacing of the
shear reinforcement has been calculated as per the ductility principle. IS 13920 -1993 have been used for
this purpose.
a) Design of structural components
The design of footings, beams, columns and slabs have been made as per IS 456: 2000 using ETABS
V16.0.3 as per limit state method of design.

i. Design of Beams:
The table given below shows the provided rebar area for beam as per the design output from ETABS
V16.0.3. The rebar area provided is slightly altered than that provided by ETABS as per necessity and
sound judgment.
Table: Beam Reinforcement Details

GRID A / GRID B
FLOOR
LEVEL
END-I MID END-J
SPAN
Plinth TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
Level
1-2/2-3 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16
3-4 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16

END-I MID END-J

SPAN
TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
1st / 2nd
Floor 1-2 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-12 2-16 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-12
2-3 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-12 2-16 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-12
3-4 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-12 2-16 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-12

END-I MID END-J

SPAN
TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
3rd Floor 1-2 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12 2-16 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12
2-3 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12 2-16 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12
3-4 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12 2-16 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12
4-5 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12 2-16 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-12

8|Page
 Table: Beam Reinforcement Details

GRID 1 / GRID 2 / GRID 3/ GRID 4

FLOOR
LEVEL
END-I MID END-J
Plinth SPAN
Level TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
A-B 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-16

END-I MID END-J

1st / 2nd SPAN
Floor TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
A-B 2-20+1-16 2-16+1-16 2-20 2-16+1-16 2-20+1-16 2-16+1-16

END-I MID END-J

3rd Floor SPAN
TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM TOP BOTTOM
A-B 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-12 2-16 2-16+1-12 2-16+1-16 2-16+1-12

9|Page
The calculation of design of beam as designed by ETABS V16.0.3 is as shown below:
ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)
Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (in) LLRF
Story1 B2 12 BEAM 14" X 9" ENV 130 136 1

Section Properties
b (in) h (in) bf (in) ds (in) dct (in) dcb (in)
9 14 9 0 1 1

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 415

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
13.252 14.8121 60.7925 -0.1442

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
13.252 22.2665 35.5185 -71.3472

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -71.3472 570 1.658E-01 570 174
Bottom (-2 Axis) 35.5185 285 263 1.658E-01 285

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
93.3015 31.7933 165.1797 47.7429 1386.21

10 | P a g e
 Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, T u & VU2
Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN in in mm²/m
14.8121 60.7925 7.8 12.8 1113.39

11 | P a g e
 ii. Design of Columns
The table given below shows the provided area for columns as per the design output from ETABS
V16.0.3.
Table: Column Reinforcement Details
GRID 1 / GRID 2 / GRID 3 / GRID 4
REBAR PROVIDED (sq.mm)
COLUMNS CORNER MID TOTAL Ast
DIA. DIA. PROVIDED
NO. NO. (sq.mm)
(mm) (mm)
STOREY
1ST 16 4 16 4 1608.45
GRID (A)
2ND 16 4 16 4 1608.45
3RD 16 4 12 4 1256.60

STOREY
1ST 16 4 16 4 1608.45
GRID (B)
2ND 16 4 16 4 1608.45
3RD 16 4 12 4 1256.60

12 | P a g e
The calculation of design of column as designed by ETABS v16.0.3. is as shown below:

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (in) LLRF
Story1 C5 58 COL 12" X 12" 1.5 (DL + EQX) 0 112 0.744

Section Properties
b (in) h (in) dc (in) Cover (Torsion) (in)
12 12 2.3 1.2

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 415

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
451.7944 -9.0359 61.949 9.0359 9.0359 1500 1.61

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless in kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.747339 98 24.7796 0 9.0359
Minor Bend(M2) 0.690177 98 -2.6529 0 9.0359

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 38.9015 69.8811 30.0894 33.767 337.85
Minor, Vu3 42.0848 69.8811 30.0894 42.0848 337.85

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN mm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

13 | P a g e
 (1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio
Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
mm² mm² kN kN kN Unitless
92903 1500.2 1398.7025 297.0178 451.7944 0.859509

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (in) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.875 12 6.103 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.875 12 5.636 12 No 0

Notes:

N/A: Not Applicable

N/C: Not Calculated

N/N: Not Needed

14 | P a g e
 iii. Design of slab

The design of slab is done manually for the given dead loads and live loads. The sample design of slab is
as follows:

15 | P a g e
16 | P a g e
 iv. Design of staircase
In the project, the staircase has been modeled in structural model in ETABS 2016.0.3 for making it
more realistic and the loads on the staircase are directly applied on it. Moreover, the design of the
staircase is done manually, the detail calculation of which is given below:
1 Material Properties
fy = 500.00 N/mm2
fck = 20.00 N/mm2
Cover = 15.00 mm
Diameter of main bars = 12.00 mm2
Diameter of distribution bars = 10.00 mm2

Tread = 0.23 m
Rise = 0.18 m
Thickness of waist slab = 0.13 m
width of slab = 1.00 m
width of landing = 1.00 m
thickness of landing slab = 0.13 m
span of landing A = 1.30 m
span of flight = 1.60 m
span of landing B = 1.07 m
Total Span = 3.96 m

2 LOAD CALCULATION

2.1 LOAD ON WAIST SLAB

Area of slab = 0.04 m2
Area of step = 0.02 m2
Total area = 0.06 m2
DLper m = 1.43 KN/m
DL = 6.24 KN/m2
FF = 1.00 KN/m2
LL = 3.00 KN/m2
Total load per m square = 10.24 KN/m2
Factored load = 15.37 KN/m2
Load per meter = 15.37 KN/m

2.2 LOAD ON LANDING

Self-weight of slab = 3.18 KN/m2

FF = 1.00 KN/m2
LL = 3.00 KN/m2
Load per meter square = 7.18 KN/m2
Factored load = 10.76 KN/m2
Load per meter 10.76 KN/m

CALCULATION OF
3
MOMENTS

Reaction at B = 25.22
Total load = 50.01
Reaction at A = 24.79
17 | P a g e
 Assuming it lies at the flight = 2.00 m
Assuming it lies at the landing = 2.30 m
Point of zero shear force = 2.00 m
Max moment at the span = 26.92 KNm
Design moment = 26.92 KNm

4 DEPTH
Effective depth required from 0.10 m
moment consideration =
Overall depth provided = 0.13 m
Effective depth = 0.11 m

5 CALCULATION OF MAIN STEEL

Ast = 699.11 mm2
Diameter of steel = 12.00 mm
Area of each steel = 113.10
Spacing required = 161.77 mm
Spacing provided = 150.00 mm
Actual steel = 753.98 mm2

CALCULATION OF
6 DISTRIBUTION STEEL
Ast = 152.40 mm2
Diameter of steel = 10.00 mm
Area of each steel = 78.54
Spacing required = 515.35 mm
Spacing provided = 150.00 mm
Actual steel = 523.60 mm2

7 CHECK FOR SHEAR

Vu = 25.22
τV = 0.24
Pt = 0.71
τC = 0.56
Check: Safe in shear

CHECK FOR DEVELOPMENT

8
LENGTH

Ld = 48.55
M1(at A) = 26.92 KNm
V(at A) = 24.79 KN
Lo(ancorage required (A)) = 106.00 mm
Ld = 1191.76 mm
Ø< 24.55 mm
Result: Safe

18 | P a g e
 9 DEFLECTION CHECK
Length (L) (m) = 3.96
Breadth (b) (mm) = 1000.00
Depth (D) (mm) = 127.00
d (mm) = 106.00
fck (N/mm2) = 25.00
2
fy (N/mm ) = 415.00
Moment (KNm) = 26.92
Mu/bd2 = 2.40
2=
Ast(reqd) mm 699.11
2=
Ast(prov) mm 753.98
a= 23.00
b= 2.00
g= 1.00
d= 1.00
l= 1.00
L/d permissible, (abgdl) = 46.00
L/d provided = 37.38
Check: O.K.

19 | P a g e
 v. Design of footing
The detail of design of combined footing is given in the table below:
TABLE 1: DETERMINATION OF SIZE OF FOOTING (L X B)

Foundation Soil Foudation Factored Unfactored

Size of Foundation
ID Data Depth load Load

Required (Hreqd.)
Allowable Bearing

Provided (Hprov.)
Capa. of Soil (q0)

Axial Load (Pu)

Axial Load (P)

Footing Depth

Footing Depth
Joint ID

Lx prov.

Ly prov.

Lx prov.

Ly prov.
Lx reqd.

Ly reqd.
Grid ID

Areqd.

Aprov.
KN/m2 m ft. KN KN m2 m m m m ft ft m2

A1 1 140.0 1.28 4.5 216.106 144.071 1.06 1.03 1.03 1.50 1.50 5.0 5.0 2.3
A2 2 140.0 1.28 4.5 417.449 278.300 2.04 1.43 1.43 1.50 1.50 5.0 5.0 2.3
A3 3 140.0 1.28 4.5 492.195 328.130 2.41 1.55 1.55 1.50 1.50 5.0 5.0 2.3
A4 4 140.0 1.28 4.5 312.773 208.515 1.53 1.24 1.24 1.50 1.50 5.0 5.0 2.3
B1 5 140.0 1.28 4.5 219.233 146.155 1.07 1.04 1.04 1.50 1.50 5.0 5.0 2.3
B2 6 140.0 1.28 4.5 430.850 287.233 2.11 1.45 1.45 1.50 1.50 5.0 5.0 2.3
B3 7 140.0 1.28 4.5 463.020 308.680 2.26 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 5.0 5.0 2.3
B4 8 140.0 1.28 4.5 300.133 200.088 1.47 1.21 1.21 1.50 1.50 5.0 5.0 2.3

TABLE 2: DETERMINATION OF THICKNESS OF FOOTING

Moment per unit Effective Total

Foundation Effective Depth of Total Depth
length on the Depth Depth
ID Footing Required Provided
face of column reqd. Required
two way shear
one way shear
dreqd based on

dreqd based on

dreqd based
Joint ID

moment
Grid ID

Dreqd.

Dprov.
dreqd.
Mux

Muy

KNm KNm m m m m m m Inch.

A1 1 17.15 17.15 0.08 0.13 0.09 0.13 0.17 0.45 18.00

A2 2 33.13 33.13 0.11 0.20 0.14 0.20 0.25 0.45 18.00
A3 3 39.06 39.06 0.12 0.23 0.16 0.23 0.27 0.45 18.00
A4 4 24.82 24.82 0.09 0.17 0.12 0.17 0.21 0.45 18.00
B1 5 17.40 17.40 0.08 0.13 0.09 0.13 0.18 0.45 18.00
B2 6 34.19 34.19 0.11 0.21 0.15 0.21 0.26 0.45 18.00
B3 7 36.75 36.75 0.12 0.22 0.15 0.22 0.27 0.45 18.00
B4 8 23.82 23.82 0.09 0.16 0.11 0.16 0.21 0.45 18.00

TABLE 3: CALCULATION OF AREA OF STEEL (AST)

20 | P a g e
 Ast Required per Diameter of C/C distance
Foundation ID Ast Provided per metre
metre Reinforcement (reinforcement)

For Mux

For Muy

For Mux

For Muy

For Mux

For Muy

For Mux

For Muy
Joint ID

Grid ID

mm2 mm2 mm mm mm mm mm2 mm2

1 A3 540.00 540.00 12.00 12.00 200 200 565 565

2 B3 540.00 540.00 12.00 12.00 200 200 565 565
3 A2 540.00 540.00 12.00 12.00 200 200 565 565
5 B2 540.00 540.00 12.00 12.00 200 200 565 565
6 C2 540.00 540.00 12.00 12.00 200 200 565 565
7 D2 540.00 540.00 12.00 12.00 200 200 565 565

21 | P a g e
5. CONCLUSION
Given residential building has been analyzed & designed as per the NBC / IS codal provision to ensure the
overall structural safety & serviceability for all the possible load combinations. Max inter-storey drift is
found to be 0.001% (EQX) and 0.000% (EQY) which is within the limit specified by code i.e. 0.4% of
storey height.
It is strongly recommended to consult the structural engineer prior any change in structural details; if
required during construction phase.

22 | P a g e
6. ANNEXES
C) COLUMN REBAR DETAILS
1) GRID A

23 | P a g e
 2) GRID B

24 | P a g e
 D) BEAM REBAR DETAILS
1) 1ST STOREY

25 | P a g e
 2) 2ND STOREY

26 | P a g e
 3) 3RD STOREY

27 | P a g e
 E) AXIAL FORCE DIAGRAM (1.5DL+1.5LL)

28 | P a g e
 F) DEFORMED SHAPE
1) EQX

29 | P a g e
30 | P a g e
 2) EQY

31 | P a g e
 G) BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM

32 | P a g e
 H) STOREY SHEAR
1) EQX

33 | P a g e
 2) EQY

34 | P a g e