Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) follows allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It results
from alloreactive processes induced by minor histocompatibility antigen incompatibilities leading to the
activation of CD4 T cells and the development of fibrosis and inflammation of the skin and visceral organs and
autoimmunity that resemble systemic sclerosis. EGFR is a ubiquitous cell receptor deeply involved in cell
proliferation, differentiation, and motility. EGFR has recently been implicated in autoimmune and fibrotic
diseases. Therefore, we tested whether Erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can prevent sclerodermatous
GVHD (Scl-GVHD). Scl-GVHD was induced in BALB/c mice by B10.D2 bone marrow and spleen cell
transplantation. Transplanted mice displayed severe clinical symptoms including alopecia, fibrosis of the skin
and visceral organs, vasculitis, and diarrhea. The symptoms were reversed in mice treated with Erlotinib. These
beneficial effects were mediated by the decreased production of activated/memory CD4+ T cells and the
reduction in T-cell infiltration of the skin and visceral organs along with a decrease in IFN-γ and IL-13 production
and autoimmune B-cell activation. The improvement provided by Erlotinib in the mouse model of Scl-GVHD
supplies a rationale for the evaluation of Erlotinib in the management of patients affected by chronic GVHD.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2015) 135, 2385–2393; doi:10.1038/jid.2015.174; published online 28 May 2015
AU
0.6
Erlotinib on the development of chronic Scl-GVHD in mice.
RESULTS 0.5
Phospho-EGFR expression in mouse ears from GVHD animals
and modulation by Erlotinib 0.4
Levels of phospho-EGFR (pEGFR) were assessed by immuno- Syn Syn-Erlo GVH GVH-Erlo
histochemistry on ear pinna sections and by western blot on
Figure 1. Effects of Erlotinib on mouse ear skin following graft-versus-host
lysates of ear lobes. pEGFR expression was greater in mouse disease (GVHD) induction and oral administration of Erlotinib (Erlo).
ear pinna that developed Scl-GVHD than in control mice (a) Immunohistochemical study of phospho-EGFR (pEGFR) on 7 μm ear skin
with a syngeneic graft (Figure 1a). This result was confirmed sections in syngeneic (Syn) BALB/c mice and in GVHD mice, revealed with
by western blot. pEGFR expression was increased by 32% diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride. (b) Western blot of pEGFR expression in
compared with syngeneic control mice (P = 0.043, Figure 1b). the ear skin of BALB/c mice submitted to a syngeneic or a nonsyngeneic graft.
Photographs were taken with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope. Original
Erlotinib decreased the expression of phospho-EGFR com- magnification × 50. Values in b are mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05; ***P ≤ 0.001.
pared with untreated GVHD mice (0.67 ± 0.019 vs. 0.53 ± AU, arbitrary unit.
0.025 arbitrary unit (AU), P = 0.0027, Figure 1b).
a 3 b 55
Syn
Syn-Erlo
Clinical score - AU
GVH
2 GVH-Erlo 45
*
40 ***
1 35
30
0 25
0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40
Days Days
c
Syngeneic Syngeneic Erlotinib
Figure 2. Effects of Erlotinib (Erlo) on clinical features following graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) induction and oral administration of Erlotinib. (a) Evolution
of the GVHD score in the different groups during Erlotinib treatment. (b) Evolution of ear skin thickness during Erlotinib treatment. (c) Representative Sirius
red–dyed ear skin sections of 7 μm, showing fibrosis in syngeneic (Syn) BALB/c mice and in GVHD mice, treated by Erlotinib or not. Photographs were taken
with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope. Original magnification × 50. Values in a and b are mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05; ***P ≤ 0.001. Bars represent mean ± SEM. AU,
arbitrary unit.
initial levels (1.03 ± 0.04-fold vs. 7.69 ± 0.50-fold in the 55.7 ± 5.85 UI l − 1, Po0.05, and AST: 464.71 ± 79.37 vs.
untreated GVHD group, P = 0.0029, Figure 3d). IL-13 mRNAs 160.33 ± 12.38 UI l − 1, Po0.01, Figure 4b and c). Erlotinib
were increased in GVHD mice compared with syngeneic decreased transaminase levels in GVHD mice (ALT: 104.88 ±
(3.69 ± 0.07-fold vs. syngeneic mice, Po0.0001, Figure 3d). 12.60 vs. 184.57 ± 31.15 UI l − 1, Po0.05, and AST: 291.25 ±
This level was decreased following Erlotinib compared with 17.04 vs. 464.71 ± 79.37 UI l − 1, Po0.05, Figure 4b and c).
untreated mice (0.52 ± 0.04-fold vs. 3.69 ± 0.07-fold in the Liver sections from untreated GVHD mice showed portal
untreated GVHD group, Po0.0001, Figure 3d). CCL17 inflammation and bile duct destruction (Figure 4a). GVHD
mRNAs were overexpressed in the skin of GVHD mice mice treated with Erlotinib displayed a significant reduction in
compared with syngeneic mice (3.34 ± 0.54-fold vs. syn- liver lesions compared with untreated GVHD animals
geneic mice, P = 0.0017). Erlotinib abolished the overexpres- (0.63 ± 0.12 vs. 2.01 ± 0.47 AU, Po0.05). Mice grafted with
sion of CCL17 in GVHD mice (0.71 ± 0.41-fold vs. syngeneic bone marrow and splenocytes, treated or not with
3.34 ± 0.54-fold in the untreated GVHD group, P = 0.0026, Erlotinib, showed no liver inflammation (0.25 ± 0.07 vs.
Figure 3d). Similarly, CCL21 mRNAs were higher in GVHD 0.19 ± 0.08 AU, P = nonsignificant).
mice than in syngeneic mice (6.51 ± 0.29-fold vs. syngeneic
mice, P = 0.0016; Figure 3d). This mRNA level was decreased Effects of Erlotinib on B- and T-cell responses
in Erlotinib-treated GVHD mice compared with untreated Anti-DNA topoisomerase I autoantibodies were increased
mice (1.23 ± 0.10-fold vs. 6.51 ± 0.29-fold in the untreated in GVHD mice compared with untreated syngeneic mice
GVHD group, P = 0.0020; Figure 3d). No difference in CCL27 (Po0.001, Figure 5a). Erlotinib significantly reduced the
mRNAs was found among the four groups (Figure 3d). levels of anti-DNA topoisomerase I autoantibodies (1.15 ±
0.23 vs. 2.65 ± 0.82 AU, Po0.001, Figure 5a). Furthermore,
Prevention of GVHD-associated liver disease by Erlotinib Erlotinib reduced the number of B cells by 43% in syngeneic
Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate mice compared with the untreated group (Po0.001,
aminotransferase (AST) were higher in GVHD -untreated Figure 5b). No difference in B-cell counts was observed
mice than in syngeneic groups (ALT: 184.6 ± 31.15 vs. between treated and untreated GVHD mice.
www.jidonline.org 2387
F Morin et al.
Erlotinib Prevents Scl-GVHD
a c IFN-γ
8 000
GVH GVH Erlotinib *
6 000
pg ml–1
4 000
2 000
0
lo
rlo
VH
Sy
Er
-E
G
n-
VH
Sy
G
GVH GVH Erlotinib IL-13
3 000
pg ml–1
2 000
*
1 000
lo
rlo
VH
Sy
Er
-E
G
n-
VH
Sy
G
b d qRT-PCR
Syn
eGFP Anti-CD3 10 Syn-Erlo
15 GVH
**
Mean cell numbers
15 ***
Mean cell numbers
8 GVH-Erlo
***
Fold increase
**
10 10 6
4 *** **
5 5
2
0 0 0
rlo
rlo
-γ
13
1
VH
7
VH
7
L2
N
L1
L2
-E
-E
IL
IF
G
G
C
C
C
VH
VH
C
C
C
G
G
Figure 3. Effects of Erlotinib (Erlo) on mouse skin following graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) induction and oral administration of Erlotinib. (a) Representative
5 μm frozen skin sections with enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) donor cells and phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-CD3 mAb staining. (b) Scores obtained
by enumerating eGFP- and anti-CD3-positive cells in 10 areas per frozen skin section. (c) Levels of IFN-γ and IL-13 produced by skin cells and used as
markers of T helper type 1 and 2 (Th1 and Th2) responses. (d) Levels of mRNAs for IFN-γ, IL-13, CCL17, CCL21, and CCL27 in the skin. Photographs
were taken with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope. Original magnification: × 100. Values in b, c, and d are mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.
qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase–PCR; Syn, syngeneic.
Similarly, CD4 T cells decreased by 40% in the Erlotinib- inhibitor Erlotinib prevents skin and visceral lesions through
treated syngeneic group compared with the untreated group an inhibition of the allogeneic response.
(Po0.05, Figure 5c). There was no effect on CD8 cell Experimental chronic GVHD shares characteristic features
numbers in treated and untreated syngeneic mice (Figure 5d). with scleroderma, including skin and visceral fibrosis,
If the levels of CD4 and CD8 T cells were significantly inflammation with systemic sclerosis, and autoimmunity.
decreased in untreated GVHD mice compared with untreated Erlotinib improves the clinical outcome of sublethally
syngeneic animals (93 and 87%, respectively Po0.001, irradiated BALB/c mice transplanted with B10.D2 hemato-
Figure 5c and d), no significant difference between the levels poietic cells. Fibrosis, alopecia, and vasculitis are clearly
of CD4 and of CD8 T cells was observed between treated and reduced in treated versus untreated mice. EGFR is a
untreated GVHD animals (Figure 5c and d ). There was an ubiquitous cell receptor involved in proliferation, differentia-
increase in the percentages of CD4 and CD8 memory T cells tion, and cell motility (Schneider and Wolf, 2009). This
within CD4 and CD8 T-cell subsets in GVHD mice compared receptor has a role in tissue fibrosis through the control of
with syngeneic animals (1.6 ± 1.4% vs. 83 ± 3%, Po 0.001, fibroblast proliferation and migration (Pastore et al., 2008).
Figure 5e and 50 ± 17% vs. 83 ± 7%, Po0.001, Figure 5f). Moreover, EGFR signaling promotes fibrosis through a trans-
Erlotinib did not influence the percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ forming growth factor-β–dependent mechanism, implicating
T cells in the syngeneic group (Figure 5e and f). Erlotinib activation of smad2/3 in various tissues like kidney or skin.
induced an increase in percent CD4 naive T cells in GVHD This could explain why EGFR inhibition by Erlotinib attenu-
mice compared with untreated mice (45% vs. 17 ± 1.6 ± ates liver fibrosis and the development of hepatocellular
1.4%, Po0.001, Figure 5e), whereas it had no effect on CD8 carcinoma (Fuchs et al., 2014).
naive T cells. Liver involvement is a common feature in human GVHD
that also occurs in the Scl-GVHD model (Jaffee and Claman,
DISCUSSION 1983; Lee et al., 2002). Indeed, in GVHD mice, we found
Here we show that Scl-GVHD is associated with an activation a periportal lymphocytic infiltration associated with an
of the EGFR pathway whose inhibition by the tyrosine kinase increase in serum transaminase levels. Erlotinib decreased
b 250 c
600 *
*
200
400
150
100
200
50
0 0
Syn Syn-Erlo GVH GVH-Erlo Syn Syn-Erlo GVH GVH-Erlo
Figure 4. Effects of Erlotinib (Erlo) on liver involvement following graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) induction and oral administration of Erlotinib.
(a) Hematoxylin–eosin staining of liver sections. GVH and GVH Erlo groups showed mixed lymphomonocytic infiltrations around the portal vein with a major
reduction in the GVH Erlo group. (b) Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels in various experimental groups. (c) Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
levels in various experimental groups. Photographs were taken using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope. The arrows showed mixed lymphocytic infiltrations around
the portal vein. Original magnification × 100. Values in b and c are mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05. Syn, syngeneic.
transaminase levels and reduced the periportal lymphocytic natural killer cells. CCL17 produced by dendritic cells,
infiltrate. Thus, in addition to its direct antifibrotic properties keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells (Saeki and
(Fuchs et al, 2014), Erlotinib inhibits the EGFR pathway and, Tamaki, 2006) has been implicated in various skin diseases
consecutively, abrogates tissue infiltration and inflammation such as atopic dermatitis and bullous pemphigoid (Furudate
of the liver. et al., 2014; Hamilton et al., 2014). CCL21 is the ligand of
The pathophysiology of chronic GVHD is still poorly CCR7 expressed by T cells, B cells, and dendritic cells
understood. However, evidence suggests that, unlike acute (Comerford et al., 2013). It has been implicated in contact
GVHD that is CD8+ T-cell dependent, the events observed in allergic dermatitis (Eberhard et al., 2004).
chronic GVHD depend on the activation of donor CD4+ In addition to its antiproliferative properties against tumor
T cells specific of minor histocompatibility antigen (Korngold cells, Erlotinib exerts inhibitory effects on T-cell proliferation.
and Sprent, 1978; Kansu, 2004; Shlomchik, 2007; Chu and Erlotinib causes G0/G1 arrest and inhibits the secretion of IL-2
Gress, 2008). After transplantation of spleen and bone and the phosphorylation of c-Raf, extracellular signal–
marrow cells, naive CD4+ T cells from B10.D2 initiate the regulated kinase, and Akt (Luo et al., 2011). Erlotinib acts as
disease in irradiated BALB/c mice. Activated donor CD4+ other antiproliferative molecules like steroids, cyclosporine,
T cells infiltrate the skin and induce fibrosis (Korngold and sirolimus, or mycophenolate that are treatments for chronic
Sprent, 1978; Kansu, 2004; Chu and Gress, 2008). In our GVHD (Wolff et al., 2010, 2011 ). Erlotinib impairs Th1-
hands, the beneficial effect of Erlotinib was associated with a mediated immune response as it inhibits the secretion of IFN-γ
reduction in the percentages of effector memory CD4+ T cells by activated T cells in vitro and ameliorates in vivo picryl
(CD69 −CD4+CD44highCD62Llow) but not of CD8+ T cells in chloride–induced ear contact dermatitis (Luo et al., 2011).
GVHD mice. IFN-γ is involved in the pathophysiology of chronic GVHD
This reduction is associated with a diminution in infiltrating (Korholz et al., 1997; Bruggen et al., 2014). It induces an
T cells in the skin and with a profound decrease in CCL17 and overexpression of HLA and adhesion molecules in target
CCL21 expression. Increased CCL17 mRNAs have already tissues and favors the recruitment of macrophages. Therefore,
been shown by Zhou et al. (2007) in murine Scl-GVHD. its inhibition by Erlotinib can participate in the improvement
CCL17 is the ligand of CCR4 on Th2 cells, basophils, and of GVHD. Recently, the immunomodulating role of Erlotinib
www.jidonline.org 2389
F Morin et al.
Erlotinib Prevents Scl-GVHD
×106 B cells
3 15
previous reports, we observed a production of anti-DNA-
AU
2 NS 10
topoisomerase I antibodies in Scl-GVHD mice that was
1 5
NS decreased by Erlotinib. We conclude that Erlotinib targets
0 rlo 0 CD4+ T cells, blocks T- and B-cell cooperation in Scl-GVHD
n
lo
rlo
lo
VH
vH
Sy
Sy
Er
Er
-E
-E
G
G
n-
n-
VH
vH
our model.
Sy
Sy
G
G
×106 T cells
300
1 000
200 fibrosis, limits the production of specific autoantibodies, and
500 NS prevents the production of CD4+ memory T cells. Inhibition of
NS 100
the EGFR pathway acts on the three main components of Scl-
0
0
GVHD: fibrosis, inflammation, and autoimmunity. These
n
n
lo
rlo
rlo
lo
vH
vH
Sy
Sy
Er
Er
-E
G
G
n-
n-
vH
vH
Sy
Sy
e CD4 naive/memory+naive f CD8 naive/memory+naive molecule for the treatment of chronic GVHD in humans.
T cells T cells
100 NS 100 NS
80 80
MATERIALS AND METHODS
NS Animals, cells, and chemicals
60 *** 60
%
%
40 40
Six-week-old female BALB/c mice (Janvier Laboratory, Le Genest
20 20
Saint Isle, France) and male B10.D2-enhanced green fluorescent
0 0
protein (eGFP) mice (gift from Colette Kanellopoulos-Langevin,
CDTA–CNRS–Orléans, France) were used in all experiments.
rlo
rlo
lo
n
rlo
vH
vH
Sy
Sy
Er
-E
-E
-E
G
G
n-
vH
vH
Sy
G
G
sign; 1: piloerection on back and underside, 1: hunched posture microscopy (Olympus BX60) by a pathologist who was blinded to
or lethargy; 0.5: alopecia o1 cm2; 1: alopecia 41 cm2; 1: vasculitis the experimental group assignment. Degree of inflammation of
(one or more purpural lesions on ears or tail); and 1: eyelid sclerosis coded microscopic sections of liver was graded from 0 to 4, as
(blepharophymosis). The severity score is the sum of these values and previously described (Nagler et al., 2000).
ranges from 0 (unaffected) to a maximum of 6. The incidence and
severity score were recorded every week by two blinded scientists. Serum AST and ALT activities
Serum activity of AST and ALT were used as markers of hepatocyte
Skin thickness cytolysis. AST and ALT activities were quantified using a standard
Skin thickness of the right and left ears lobes of mice was measured clinical automatic analyser (Modular PP, Roche Diagnostics, Meylan,
each week with a digital calliper and expressed in mm. France).
www.jidonline.org 2391
F Morin et al.
Erlotinib Prevents Scl-GVHD
Flow cytometric analysis of spleen cell subsets Grange PA, Raingeaud J, Calvez V et al. (2009) Nicotinamide inhibits
Cell suspensions from spleens were prepared after hypotonic lysis of Propionibacterium acnes-induced IL-8 production in keratinocytes
through the NF-kappaB and MAPK pathways. J Dermatol Sci 56:
erythrocytes in potassium acetate solution. Cells were incubated with 106–12
the appropriate labeled antibody at 4 °C for 30 minutes in phosphate- Hamilton JD, Suárez-Fariñas M, Dhingra N et al. (2014) Dupilumab improves
buffered saline with 2% normal fetal calf serum. Flow cytometry was the molecular signature in skin of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic
performed using a FACS Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 134:1293–300
according to standard techniques. The mAbs used in this study Jaffee BD, Claman HN (1983) Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) as a
model for scleroderma. I. Description of model systems. Cell Immunol 77:
were anti-B220-PECy7, anti-CD11b-biotin and Streptavidin-PerCP, 1–12
anti-CD11c-PE on one hand and anti-CD69-BV421, anti-CD44-PE, Johnson JR, Cohen M, Sridhara R et al. (2005) Approval summary for erlotinib
anti-CD62L-APC, anti-CD4-PerCP, and anti-CD8-PE-Cy7 (BD for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small
Biosciences) on the other hand. Data were analyzed with FlowJo cell lung cancer after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen.
Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 11:6414–21
software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
Kansu E (2004) The pathophysiology of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Int J
Hematol 79:209–15
Statistical analysis Kavian N, Servettaz A, Mongaret C et al. (2010) Targeting ADAM-17/notch
All quantitative data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Data were signaling abrogates the development of systemic sclerosis in a
compared using one-way analysis of variance followed by murine model. Arthritis Rheum 62:3477–87
Dunn’s multiple comparison test. Student’s unpaired t-test was used Kavian N, Marut W, Servettaz A et al. (2012) Arsenic trioxide prevents murine
sclerodermatous graft-versus-host disease. J Immunol 188:5142–9
when comparing two groups. All analyses were carried out using the
Korholz D, Kunst D, Hempel L et al. (1997) Decreased interleukin 10 and
GraphPad Prism 5.0 statistical software package (San Diego, CA),
increased interferon-gamma production in patients with chronic graft-
and P-values of o0.05 were considered significant. versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone
Marrow Transplant 19:691–5
Korngold R, Sprent J (1978) Lethal graft-versus-host disease after bone
CONFLICT OF INTEREST marrow transplantation across minor histocompatibility barriers in mice.
The authors state no conflict of interest. Prevention by removing mature T cells from marrow. J Exp Med 148:
1687–98
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Kumai T, Oikawa K, Aoki N et al. (2014) Tumor-derived TGF-β and
We thank A Colle for typing the manuscript and N Saidu for reviewing the prostaglandin E2 attenuate anti-tumor immune responses in head and
manuscript. This work was supported by grants from University Paris neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with EGFR inhibitor. J Transl Med
Descartes. 12:265
Lee SJ, Klein JP, Barrett AJ et al. (2002) Severity of chronic graft-versus-host
disease: association with treatment-related mortality and relapse. Blood
REFERENCES 100:406–14
Akita RW, Sliwkowski MX (2003) Preclinical studies with Erlotinib (Tarceva). Linhares YPL, Pavletic S, Gale RP (2013) Chronic GVHD: Where are we?
Semin Oncol 30:15–24 Where do we want to be? Will immunomodulatory drugs help? Bone
Baird K, Pavletic SZ (2006) Chronic graft versus host disease. Curr Opin Marrow Transplant 48:203–9
Hematol 13:426–35 Luo Q, Gu Y, Zheng W et al. (2011) Erlotinib inhibits T-cell-mediated immune
Bruggen MC, Klein I, Greinix H et al. (2014) Diverse T-cell responses response via down-regulation of the c-Raf/ERK cascade and Akt signaling
characterize the different manifestations of cutaneous graft-versus-host pathway. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 251:130–6
disease. Blood 123:290–9 Marut W, Kavian N, Servettaz A et al. (2013) Amelioration of systemic
Chu Y-W, Gress RE (2008) Murine models of chronic graft-versus-host disease: fibrosis in mice by angiotensin II receptor blockade. Arthritis Rheum 65:
insights and unresolved issues. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant J Am Soc 1367–77
Blood Marrow Transplant 14:365–78 Nagler A, Pines M, Abadi U et al. (2000) Oral tolerization ameliorates liver
Comerford I, Harata-Lee Y, Bunting MD et al. (2013) A myriad of functions disorders associated with chronic graft versus host disease in mice.
and complex regulation of the CCR7/CCL19/CCL21 chemokine axis Hepatology 31:641–8
in the adaptive immune system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 24: Nishimori H, Maeda Y, Tanimoto M (2013) Chronic graft-versus-host disease:
269–83 disease biology and novel therapeutic strategies. Acta Med Okayama 67:
Eberhard Y, Ortiz S, Ruiz Lascano A et al. (2004) Up-regulation of the 1–8
chemokine CCL21 in the skin of subjects exposed to irritants. BMC Pastore S, Mascia F, Mariani V et al. (2008) The epidermal growth factor
Immunol 5:7 receptor system in skin repair and inflammation. J Invest Dermatol 128:
Ferrara JLM, Levine JE, Reddy P et al. (2009) Graft-versus-host disease. Lancet 1365–74
373:1550–61 Robert J (2011) [Tyrosine kinase inhibitors]. Bull Cancer (Paris) 98:1321–34
Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S et al. (2005) National Institutes of Health Ruzek MC, Jha S, Ledbetter S et al. (2004) A modified model of graft-versus-
consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic host-induced systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) exhibits all major aspects of
graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. the human disease. Arthritis Rheum 50:1319–31
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transplant 11:
945–56 Saeki H, Tamaki K (2006) Thymus and activation regulated chemokine (TARC)/
CCL17 and skin diseases. J Dermatol Sci 43:75–84
Fuchs BC, Hoshida Y, Fujii T et al. (2014) Epidermal growth factor receptor
inhibition attenuates liver fibrosis and development of hepatocellular Schneider MR, Wolf E (2009) The epidermal growth factor receptor ligands at
carcinoma. Hepatol Baltim Md 59:1577–90 a glance. J Cell Physiol 218:460–6
Furudate S, Fujimura T, Kambayashi Y et al. (2014) Comparison of CD163+ Servettaz A, Goulvestre C, Kavian N et al. (2009) Selective oxidation of DNA
CD206+ M2 macrophages in the lesional skin of bullous pemphigoid and topoisomerase 1 induces systemic sclerosis in the mouse. J Immunol 182:
pemphigus vulgaris: the possible pathogenesis of bullous pemphigoid. 5855–64
Dermatology 229:369–78 Shlomchik WD (2007) Graft-versus-host disease. Nat Rev Immunol 7:340–52
Socié G, Ritz J (2014) Current issues in chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood Yahata Y, Shirakata Y, Tokumaru S et al. (2006) A novel function of angiotensin
124:374–84 II in skin wound healing. Induction of fibroblast and keratinocyte migration
Vogelsang GB, Lee L, Bensen-Kennedy DM (2003) Pathogenesis and treatment by angiotensin II via heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like
of graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplant. Annu Rev Med growth factor-mediated EGF receptor transactivation. J Biol Chem 281:
54:29–52 13209–16
Wolff D, Gerbitz A, Ayuk F et al. (2010) Consensus conference on clinical Yamamoto T (2010) Animal model of systemic sclerosis. J Dermatol 37:26–41
practice in chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD): first-line and Yang F, Chung ACK, Huang XR et al. (2009) Angiotensin II induces connective
topical treatment of chronic GVHD. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16: tissue growth factor and collagen I expression via transforming growth
1611–28 factor-beta-dependent and -independent Smad pathways: the role
Wolff D, Schleuning M, von Harsdorf S et al. (2011) Consensus of Smad3. Hypertension 54:877–84
Conference on Clinical Practice in Chronic GVHD: second-line treatment Zhou L, Askew D, Wu C et al. (2007) Cutaneous gene expression by DNA
of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 17: microarray in murine sclerodermatous graft-versus-host disease, a model
1–17 for human scleroderma. J Invest Dermatol 127:281–92
www.jidonline.org 2393