You are on page 1of 11

Trop. Agr. Develop.

58(4):169 - 179,2014

Land Use and Farming Systems in Dry Zone, Myanmar:


A Case Study in Kani, Sagaing Region

Moe Swe YEE and Eiji NAWATA*

Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan

Abstract The dominant features of the Myanmar Dry Zone include erratic rainfall, soil with low nutrient content and high
temperatures. The majority of the people depend on agriculture. In order to determine how the local people adapted themselves
to their agro-environment, land types and agricultural systems in four villages in the Sagaing region were analyzed, based on field
observations and interviews. In the surveyed villages, a sesame-pigeon pea intercropping system has predominated since long
time ago. Other upland field crops such as groundnut and a fruit tree, jujube, were also cultivated. Groundnut and sesame oil
mainly fulfilled home consumption. Pigeon pea and jujube were cash crops exported to India and China. The existing cropping
systems were able to secure their home consumption with adaptability to the environment, in addition to supply of the income.
In the recent decades, however, the farmers have faced a reduction in the productivities of the present major crops. They are
considering the possibility of introducing more profitable new cash crops than those in the present cropping systems to provide
a higher economic viability.
Key words: Agroecosystem, Cash crops, Cropping system, High risk, Rainfed agriculture

ter-holding capacity, and high temperatures. Since the


Introduction
region chronically receives a low rainfall compared to
Myanmar, the largest country in mainland South- the other parts of Myanmar, local people meet unstable
east Asia is predominantly a monsoon country and livelihoods with little prospect of increasing agricultural
seasonal changes in the monsoon wind directions create production.
three seasons: summer, rainy and winter seasons (Sen It is said that most of the small holders have em-
Roy and Kaur, 2000). Based on its topography and agro- ployed practices designed to optimize productivity in the
ecological conditions, Myanmar is generally divided into long term rather than to maximize it in the short term
four different zones, i.e, Coastal region, Delta region, the (Glissman et al., 1981). In order to achieve the optimized
Dry Zone and Mountain region. sustainable agricultural production, it is indispensable
The Dry Zone in central Myanmar covers approxi- to evaluate the local agricultural resources and past and
mately 8.7 million hectares or about 13% of the country’s present farming systems. Therefore, the objectives of
total land area, and consists of the lower Sagaing, Man- the present study were to analyze the agroecosystems of
dalay and Magway Regions (Hadden, 2008). About 14.5 the Dry Zone and to determine how the Dry Zone farm-
million people, close to one third of the country’s popula- ers adapted themselves to their agro-environment, even
tion live there (Poe, 2011), and the majority depends on under severe conditions, through land use and farming
agriculture and allied activities for livelihood. According systems. In the present study, the detailed land use
to the Asian Development Bank (ADB, 2009), Myanmar and cropping systems in the central Dry Zone, Sagaing
is one of the countries which are the most vulnerable region was analyzed as a case study.
to climate changes. Drought and water scarcity are the
dominant climate-related hazards in the Myanmar Dry
Methodology
Zone. Kyi (2012) stated that there is a saying in Burmese
“a nyar thar, ta moe loe hnit mawe”, which means that Field surveys were conducted in Kani Township,
a dry land people can be poor after just one drought. Yinmarbin District (officially subdivided from Monywa
The dominant feature of the Dry Zone regions include District in September, 2013), Sagaing Region (Fig.1),
erratic rainfall, sandy soils with low fertility and low wa- in which agriculture is mainly practiced under rainfed
conditions, and the area is important in terms of typical
Communicated by H. Gemma field crop production and road-side location on the main
Received Mar. 6, 2014 route, Monywa-Yagyi-Kalaywa Road, for border trade
Accepted Sep. 22, 2014
* Corresponding author
with China and India. Kani is a small town, located on the
  nawata@kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp western bank of the Chindwin River. The construction
170 Trop. Agr. Develop. 58(4)2014

To Kalaywa
Chindwin River

Kani
ASEAN High Way
TMC
YKT
ZPT
CM To Monywa

Dry Zone Region

250kn 1. Lower Sagaing Township area


2. Mandalay Town
3. Magway
Village
Fig. 1. Map of the study area in the Dry Zone region, Myanmar.
Regarding the abbreviation of the village names, please refer to the text.

of Monywa-Yagyi-Kalaywa Road as a part of the ASEAN The basic maps showing the landmarks, land-holdings,
highway (AH1, from the border of Thailand to the border land types and allocation of land by land parcels in each
of India) project was launched on June 1, 2000, which village were obtained with the assistance of the Settle-
connected Monywa to the Indian border. It was com- ment and Land Record Department in Kani.
pleted in 2003 and expected to be the shortest link to the Households were randomly selected for interview
border with India and to contribute to the development surveys related to agricultural activities, land use and
of border trade and national economy. The road passed farming systems in the present and past. The total
through the middle of Kani Township administrative number of households (HH) involved in this study was
area, from a southeastern to a northwestern direction, 108 during the periods from December 2011 to March
20 km away from Kani Town. The construction of the 2012, and from July to August 2012, namely, 30 HHs
road from Kani Town to the ASEAN main road was also from CM, 33 from ZPT, 25 from YKT and 20 from TMC.
completed in 2003. The surveyed villages, Chanung Ma Further investigations were conducted by informal
(CM), Zee Pin Twin (ZPT), Yet Kan Tine (YKT) and Tha discussions, and group interviews twice on average
Min Chan (TMC), with a total number of households and in each surveyed village to cover seasonal changes in
population (shown in the parenthesis) of 105 (575), 209 agricultural activities, land use and farming systems. Field
(1041), 172 (946) and 148 (877) at the time of the survey, observations were conducted to confirm the location of
respectively, were located in the administrative area of lowland and upland fields, physical conditions of the
Kani Township. Each of the surveyed villages was a part soils, household land ownerships, cropping systems and
of administrative villages (village tract) with the same agricultural practices.
names. For example, Chanung Ma (CM) is a small vil-
lage in the Chanung Ma village tract. The area surveyed
Results and Discussion
was characterized by a generally hilly topography, with
undulating slopes and few flat areas. Elevations ranged Land use in Dry Zone area
from 130m in the northeastern parts to about 220m in The Dry Zone Greening Department classified and
the southwestern parts of the township territorial area. recorded the land use types of the Dry Zone as follows;
Crops grown, lack of irrigation systems and accessibility agricultural land, forest, water bodies and others (Table
to the nearest town were the factors taken into consider- 1). Agriculture was the major land use type accounting
ation in the selection of the villages for the study. for about 57% of the total area of the Dry Zone. About
The detailed climatic data were obtained from 27%, more than one-fourth of the region was still covered
the Department of Meteorology and Hydrology, Kani with forests. Water bodies made up only 1.5% of the Dry
Township. The statistical data of land use were collected Zone surface, reflecting the scarcity of water resources.
from the annual reports (2011 and 2012) of the Offices of Other land uses included swamp areas, sand areas and
Settlement and Land Records Department, Department settlements. The Settlement and Land Record Depart-
of Agriculture, in Yinmarbin and Kani, and the Office of ment (SLRD 2011) stated that the net sown acreage of
Village General Administration in the surveyed villages. Myanmar in 2010 was 11,965,000 ha. According to Table
Yee and Nawata: Land use and farming systems in Dry Zone, Myanmar 171

Table 1. Land use types of Dry Zone, Myanmar in 2010.


Land use and ecological type Area (ha) % of total
Forest 2,182,007 27
Forest affected by shifting cultivation 986,006 12
Agriculture 4,678,644 57
Other land uses 128,384 2
Water bodies 191,259 2
Total 8,166,300 100
Source: The Dry Zone Greening Department, Ministry of Environmental Conservation
and Forestry, Myanmar.

Table 2. Land use in Kani Township, Sagaing Region, in the study, ZPT harbored the largest agricultural and
Myanmar in 2011. forest lands, while CM the smallest. There was no forest
Land use unit Area (ha) % of total land in the surveyed villages except for ZPT. For culti-
Agricultural land 76,177 23 vated areas in all the villages, there were very few paddy
Forest 155,979 46
Wood land* 2,429 7 fields and the land area was occupied mostly by upland
Fallow land 43,134 13 fields, especially in TMC.
Meadow land 36,643 11
Total land area 336,061 100
Agricultural environment
*Land mostly covered with dense growth of trees and shrubs,
from which timber or fuel wood was cut. Topographically, the average elevation of ZPT was
Source: Settlement and Land Record Department Office, Kani. 220m, CM 150 m, YKT 138m and TMC 140m with undu-
lating fields. Mean temperatures ranged from a minimum
1 and the statement of SLRD (2011), 40% of the total of about 10℃ in December, January and February to a
agricultural land of the whole country was located in the maximum of about 43℃ in March, April and May. Fig.
Dry Zone. 2 shows the mean temperatures in 11 years (2001-2011)
with 21-year average monthly rainfall (1991-2011) in Kani
Land use types and characteristics in the study area Township. The area showed a bimodal rainfall distribu-
Table 2 indicates that in Kani Township, the forest tion pattern influenced strongly by the monsoon, duirng
land area occupied nearly half of the total land area of the which precipitation was concentrated from May to July
Township, whereas the cultivated area only one-fourth, and from August to October. According to the villagers,
similarly to unutilized areas (fallow and meadow). For the heaviest intensity of rainfall during 24 hours was
these regions, forest land referred to the areas with generally observed in May and June, whereas Septem-
substantially higher levels of canopy closure, up to 60%. ber was the month with heaviest monthly rainfall. There
Land mostly covered with dense growth of trees and were some periods without precipitation. Especially in
shrubs, from which timber or fuel wood was cut, was July, dry spells occurred when dry desiccating winds
designated as wood land. blew from the south, but the length and frequency of the
dry spells were variable.
Land use and distribution in the study area Based on traditional knowledge, forecasts on the
According to Tables 3 and 4, among the villages rainfall amount and onset of the rainy season were

Table 3. Land use of the surveyed villages, Kani Township, Sagaing Region, Myanmar in 2011.
Land types
Total area
Villages Agricultural land Forest Wood land Fallow land Meadow land
(ha)
(ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha)
Chaung Ma 1,268* 0 0 385 580 2,233
Zee Pin Twin 5,733 3,505 4,169 25 2,690 16,122
Yet Kan Tine 1,891* 0 0 378 203 2,472
Tha Min Chan 2,600 0 0 0 192 2,792
11,492 3,505 4,169 788 3,665 23,619
*Area calculated based on the data provided by the Departments of Agriculture and Land Record.
Source: Annual Report, 2012. General Administrative Department, Kani.
Note: The area of each land type was calculated based on the total area of village tract.
(an administrative village). Each of the surveyed villages was a part of administrative villages (village tract) with the same names.
172 Trop. Agr. Develop. 58(4)2014

Table 4. Land distribution of the surveyed villages, Kani Township, Sagaing Region, Myanmar in
2011.
Agricultural land (ha)
Villages Total area (ha)
Upland field Paddy field Horticultural field
Chaung Ma 1,227 37 12 1,276*
Zee Pin Twin 4,989 92 652 5,733
Yet Kan Tine 1,814 69 0 1,883*
Tha Min Chan 2,594 6 0 2,600
*Area calculated based on the data provided by the Departments of Agriculture and Land Record in relation
to standing crops.
Source: Annual Report, 2012. General Administrative Department, Kani.
Note: The area of each land type was calculated based on the total area of village tract.
(an administrative village). Each of the surveyed villages was included in the village tract.

mm ℃
180 45
160 40
140 35

Average temperature
120 30
Monthly rainfall

100 25
80 20
60 15
40 10
20 5
0 0
Rainfall
Max temperature
y

ry

ch

il

ay

ne

ly

er

r
us

be

be

be
ar

pr

Ju

ob
ua

ar

Ju

ug
nu

em

em

em
A
M
br

ct

Mean temperature
A
Ja

pt

ov

ec
Fe

Se

D
N

Min temperature

Fig. 2. Monthly average rainfall in 21 years (1991-2011) and maximum,


minimum and mean temperatures in 11 years (2001-2011) in Kani
Township, Sagaing Region, Myanmar.
Source: Department of Meteorology and Hydrology, Kani (2012).

made by local people for decisions on agriculture. They Crop production


observed natural phenomena in their environment to The major cultivated crops in the surveyed villages
predict rainfall. Some examples of rainfall predictions were sesame, pigeon pea, groundnut, rice and jujube
were the observation of animals. The occurrence of bee, (Table 5). According to the interviews of the villagers
wasp and ant swarms indicated the duration of rainy pe- conducted in 2011 and 2012, all the surveyed households
riods. The farmers also predicted the rainfall conditions adopted a sesame-pigeon pea intercropping system and
based on the occurrence of rainfall during the three days produced jujube since they owned upland fields. All of
of the annual water festival in April. There were some the upland crops were cultivated in the inter-space of
other predictions using e.g. astrological phenomena and jujube trees since there were a number of jujube plants
characteristics. Although the prediction based on these scattered in almost all the upland fields.
natural phenomena seems to be non-scientific, the local Originally, there were many jujube trees in upland
farmers paid a great attention to them. farms, owned by former generations. These trees were
According to the soil classification data of the Land naturally grown as the natural conditions in the region
Use Department (LUD, 2002), the major soil types found were favorable. It was a local variety developed from wild
in the area were red brown savanna soils, Luvisol. Local types and at first the farmers were not interested in this
people subdivided and named the soils based on physi- type of jujube for cultivation. They allowed these trees to
cal properties, i.e sandy soil (the-mye), gravel-strewn red grow in the fields mainly for the protection of their crops
soil (mye- ni–kyauk–sa– yit), compact soil (kyit – mye) and from damages by cattle and possibly thefts from their
caliche (phyut- chay- mye). Comprehensive studies have neighbors, since thorny branches could be used as a
not been conducted on the soils in this area, and very hedge. After 1988, however, transportation, communica-
little information was available on the soil properties. tion and open market policy were well established under
the administration of the State Peace and Development
Yee and Nawata: Land use and farming systems in Dry Zone, Myanmar 173

Table 5. Cultivated crops in selected households in the surveyed villages, Kani Township, Sagaing Region, Myanmar
in 2011 and 2012.
Number of households growing
Villages Households
Sesame Groundnut Pigeon pea Rice Jujube
Chaung Ma 30 5 30 12* 30 30
Zee Pin Twin 33 3 33 8 33 33
Yet Kan Tine 25 8 25 14 25 25
Tha Min Chan 20 2 20 2* 20 20
*Decision-making for rice growing depended on the onset and availability of rain. The number of rice-growing households
changed year by year unlike that of the households growing other crops.
Source: Household interviews in CM, ZPT, YKT and TMC.

Council (changed to the Government of the Republic of and ZPT, were able to produce rice every year, because
the Union of Myanmar, in 2011). As a result, the farmers the water-holding capacity of the soil in YKT and ZPT
were aware of the value of the crop and investigated new was higher than that in the other two villages, CM and
and advanced technologies, such as the propagation of TMC. The farmers in CM and TMC said that they did not
improved varieties by grafting to local type jujube trees. produce rice every year because the soil conditions were
The villagers were able to produce marketable jujube unfavorable compared to those in the other two villages.
fruits; sweet, delicious using small-sized jujube varieties The water-holding capacity of soils that were generally
instead of the conventional variety. Since the jujube sandy, was too low for paddy production. Rainfall was
plants were naturally spread out in their fields, the vil- critically unstable and only in some years, there was
lagers produced marketable jujube grafted on existing sufficient water to grow rice. In dry years, paddy field,
local type plants without increasing the plant population especially those located in the two villages, were left idle,
or area extension. based on interviews of the villagers in CM and TMC.
Groundnut cultivation without any combined crops According to the local farmer interviews and statis-
except for jujube, was also observed but to small extent. tical data, pigeon pea and jujube were cultivated in all
According to the sampled household interviews, the the sample households, mainly for commercial use, for
number of groundnut growers had decreased because gaining income to buy staple foods and other household
the yield could not cover the inputs, mainly seed cost, needs. Other crops, sesame, groundnut and rice were
since the price of groundnut seeds at sowing time was mainly grown for home consumption.
very high.
Topography of the survey area was characterized Agricultural practices and machinery
by gently undulating land as previously described. For crop production, farming practices and ma-
Although in some depressions rainfall accumulated, the chinery were investigated based on interviews with
amount of water was not sufficient for rice cultivation. the villagers and the statistical year book of the Village
In almost all the years, some water which accumulated General Administration Office (VGA, 2012). Table 6
in lowland both directly from rainfall and by runoff from shows the extent of mechanization in crop production.
the upland area, had enabled to cultivate rice. Among the Several traditional farm instruments, which were manu-
villages, some households owning paddy fields in YKT ally handled and/or attached to cattle, had been used for

Table 6. Use of agricultural machinery in the surveyed villages, Kani Township, Sagaing Region, Myanmar.
Number of agricultural instruments
Total number
Villages Plow & Threshing
Seed Driller Hand Tractor Water Pump of households
Harrow Mill
Chaung Ma 680 - - 6 2 105
Zee Pin Twin 1,296 6 - - 5 209
Yet Kan Tine 855 - 4 11 - 172
Tha Min Chan 787 - - 5 - 148
Source: Village General Administrative Office in CM, ZPT, YKT and TMC.
Note: The number of plows and harrows was counted for several traditional farm instruments which had been used in the farming
process, such as iron bars for breaking hard pan, harrow teeth, crop seeding markers for sowing, inter-cultivator for weeding,
inter-cultivator for pruning/thinning, sickle for manual harvest, etc.
174 Trop. Agr. Develop. 58(4)2014

tillage operations. The farmers were still using human chemical fertilizers mentioned that the soil characteris-
and animal power. Only a few farmers in the villages tics and moisture conditions were unfavorable for profit-
used hand tractors. For farm activities, a few households able yields steadily and that they restricted investment.
owned water pumps and threshing machines. All the Among the villages, YKT used the highest amount of
adult members of the farm households were involved in foliar fertilizers for groundnut, while one household did
farm work. not use any. For rice production, the CM and TMC vil-
For fertilizer application, at the time of the survey, lagers did not apply chemical fertilizers, unlike ZPT and
100% of the interviewed farm households in the surveyed YKT villagers. However, about 50% of the households
villages applied manure for all the cultivated crops. The applied them twice and the higher amount of fertilizers
manure, a mixture of cow dung, household waste and was used for basal application. The others used them
crop residues, was piled in the corner of their house only once with a lower amount for basal application in
and applied to the fields before land preparation. The ZPT and YKT.
interviewed households stated that they applied all the For jujube, 100% of the sampled farm households in
manures to their fields, which were produced by daily YKT and TMC applied fertilizers, while the TMC villag-
efforts. Tables 7 and 8 shows how manure and chemical ers used higher application. Sixty seven percent of the
fertilizers were applied, including the application rates surveyed households in CM and thirty nine percent in
for each crop in the study area. In sesame and pigeon ZPT used chemical fertilizers unlike others. Most of the
pea intercropping, the farmers in CM and ZPT did not households in CM and ZPT who did not use chemical
apply any fertilizers, while in the other 2 villages they fertilizers told that without chemicals fertilizers, jujube
applied a small amount. Households who did not apply could produce profit comparable to that of other crops.

Table 7. Number of households using manure and/or chemicals for crop production in the surveyed villages.
Number of households using
Villages Sesame-Pigeon pea Groundnut Rice Jujube
Manure (M) Chemicals (C) M C M C M C
CM 30 * 5 3 12 * * 30
ZPT 33 * 3 3 8 8 * 33
YKT 25 8 8 5 14 14 * 25
TMC 20 5 2 2 2 * * 20
*No households used respective fertilizer.
Manure was a mixture of cow dung, household wastes and crops residues.
Commonly used chemical fertilizers were urea (N) and compound fertilizer (N:P:K 16:16:8 and 15:15:15).
Commonly used liquid fertilizers were Ca:N:Bo 6:5:1.
Source: Household interviews in CM, ZPT, YKT and TMC.

Table 8. Fertilizer application and application rate for each crop in the surveyed villages, Kani Township, Sagaing Region,
Myanmar.
Sesame-Pigeon pea Groundnut Rice Jujube
Village
HHs Liter/ha* HHs Liter/ha* HHs kg/ha HHs Time/season
CM 30 -** 3 2.5 12 -** 8 Twice
12 Once
10 -**
ZPT 33 -** 3 2.5 8 210-226 13 Once
20 -**
YKT 8 1.5 4 3.25 14 192-222 20 Twice
17 -** 1 -** 5 Once
TMC 3 1.5 2 2.5 2 -** 20 Twice
17 -**
*Liquid fertilizers were used.
**No households used chemical fertilizers for the respective crops.
Commonly used chemical fertilizers were urea (N) and compound fertilizer (N:P:K 16:16:8 and 15:15:15).
Commonly used liquid fertilizers were Ca:N:Bo 6:5:1.
For jujube, the application rate of chemicals based on planted area could not be calculated.
Source: Household interviews in CM, ZPT, YKT and TMC.
Yee and Nawata: Land use and farming systems in Dry Zone, Myanmar 175

According to the household interviews, the choice


Cropping systems of crops and cropping system was mainly based on
Based on the interviews of the villagers, although natural setting in their region. For field crop production,
the number of groundnut growers had decreased and the supplementary irrigation system managed privately or
importance of jujube in home economy had increased, by the government development project was not avail-
cultivated crops and cropping patterns of the past and able. Water resources such as natural streams were very
present did not change significantly since the farming seasonal since they received water only when rain came.
was practiced, and the constraints associated with natu- Major soil types in the surveyed villages consisted of
ral conditions did not permit the growers to change the sandy and gravel-strewn red soils, with a low water-hold-
system. Fig. 3 shows the crops presently cultivated and ing capacity. In this sense, the farmers selected crops
the crop calendar of the households based on the type of which could be produced only under rainfed conditions
land-holding and season. during the rainy season. The common cropping system,
In the surveyed villages, a pigeon-pea based crop- highly evaluated by the interviewed farm households,
ping pattern was the major traditional cropping system. was sesame-pigeon pea intercropping. Sesame oil is the
Under their natural environment, the farmers tradition- typical cooking oil for their daily food and it was one of
ally planted sesame with pigeon pea in May and har- the factors in their consideration. Sesame and pigeon
vested sesame at the latest in July or early August. After pea were planted in May and sesame was harvested in
harvesting of sesame, growth of pigeon pea continued August. Shading by sesame leaves did not affect the
with rain in August and early September. Productivity growth of pigeon pea because of the small leaf blades
of pigeon pea was determined by the moisture available and fall of the lower old leaves. After sesame harvesting,
at planting time in May and late vegetative and early relatively plentiful rainfall was expected in August and
reproductive growth periods in August according to September. As a result, the growth of pigeon pea was
the farmers. Farmers stated that timely precipitation enhanced, and the moisture received during that period
was essential and they also noted that in some years, was sufficient for later growth. According to the farm-
insufficient moisture for later growth stages of sesame ing experience and indigenous knowledge, pigeon pea
in July, caused by dry spells, led to lower yield. However, showed a high productivity even in the absence of rain in
they took this risk because the input for sesame in this late October and November. Another important feature
cropping pattern was minimal and negligible compared in this system was the existence of jujube, cultivated with
to the profits from pigeon pea. Groundnut cultivation sesame and pigeon pea. This crop is drought-tolerant
occurred in August and September. The farmers had and inputs used by the farmers were minimal compared
planted groundnut during the period from late August to those for other field crops. Both pigeon pea and jujube
to mid-September, during which some amount of rain could be exported to India and China, too.
fell and somewhat stable production was expected.
Although groundnut cultivation had decreased year by Productivity
year recently and its relative importance was not very Based on the interviews and the data from the
high, in the past, most of the villagers cultivated it, ac- statistical year book of 2012 from the Department of
cording to the interviews with the villagers. Agriculture, the average yield of cultivated crops at the

Fig. 3. Crop calendar of the villages studied in Sagaing Region, Myanmar.


176 Trop. Agr. Develop. 58(4)2014

national level and the actual yield in the surveyed area of rice, sesame and pigeon pea (May and June) and at
are shown in Table 9. The data clearly indicated that the the time of the vigorous growth period of pigeon pea
yield of rice in the research area was significantly lower or sowing time of groundnut (August and September).
than national average, whereas that of pigeon pea was During this 21-year period, the average rainfall of the pe-
similar. Sesame and groundnut yields were also lower riod from May to June was 243mm and that of the period
than the national average. The villagers stated that crop from August to September was 583mm. The relatively
yields were lower than those in other regions because of high values of CV, 46% in the May-June period and 38% in
the lower soil fertility and available moisture. Especially the August-September period, indicated that the yearly
in rice, the soil type, sandy with a low water-holding variations of the precipitation in these 2 periods were
capacity, could not give a high yield. Precipitation dur- large.
ing the sowing period (May-June) and growth period In 1995 and 1996, the loweast amount of rain, less
(July-October) was also the main factor for determining than or about 100mm was recorded in May and June,
rice yield. Therefore, investment for rice production was whereas the highest amount of 500 - 600mm fell in
low. For jujube productivity, very little information and August and September. Therefore, the farmers faced
few records by the people were available. the limitation of soil moisture for planting sesame,
Fig. 4 shows more detailed characteristics of rain- pigeon pea and rice, while soil moisture was sufficient
fall in the surveyed area during the period from 1991 for growth of pigeon pea at later stages and groundnut
to 2011. The average annual rainfall of 917mm ranged planting. A similar phenomenon was observed in 2002
from 1168mm for the highest year (2006) to 625mm for and 2006. On the other hand, in 2007, rainfall amount
the lowest year (2001). The value of the coefficient of during the May-June period was high, while that of the
variation (CV) was 17%, indicating that there were large August-September period was low. Hence, soil moisture
annual variations during this 21-year period, compared to was suitable for the planting of field crops, but too low
the other areas of Myanmar. According to Sen Roy and for groundnut planting. When we examined the rainfall
Kaur (2000), CV of annual rainfall during 33 years (1947- distribution in 1998, 1999, 2003 and 2010, the rainfall
1979) was less than 14% in other areas of Myanmar. Fig. amount during the May-June period and, August-Sep-
5 indicates the rainfall during crop seasons, which was tember period did not show a considerable difference.
recorded yearly by the Department of Meteorology and The soil moisture was suitable for planting of sesame
Hydrology, Kani township, i.e. rainfall at planting times and pigeon pea during the May-June period and, also for

Table 9. Average yield in Myanmar and in the surveyed township (Kani, Sagaing Region) in 2012.
Yield (kg/ha)
Subjects
Sesame Groundnut Pigeon pea Rice
National 530 1,570 1,250 4,056
Research area 330 993 1,007 750
Source: Department of Agricultural Planning, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, Myanmar and General
Administrative Department Office, Kani.

mm
1400
700
1200 600
1000
Annual rainfall

500
Rainfall (mm)

800 400

600 May-June
300
Aug-Sept
400 200

200 100

0 0
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
19 1
19 2
19 3
19 4
19 5
19 6
19 7
19 8
20 9
20 0
20 1
20 2
20 3
20 4
20 5
20 6
20 7
20 8
20 9
20 0
11

19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
19

Fig. 4. Changes of annual rainfall during a 21-year period Fig. 5. Rainfall amounts during the periods of May-June and
(1991-2011) in Kani Township, Sagaing Region, August-September in 1995-2011 in Kani Township,
Myanmar. Sagaing Region, Myanmar.
Source: Department of Meteorology and Hydrology, Kani
(2012).
Yee and Nawata: Land use and farming systems in Dry Zone, Myanmar 177

groundnut planting and growth of pigeon pea during the affecting agriculture, however, was the large variation of
August-September period. High productivity of all the rainfall distribution during an agriculturally important
planted crops could be expected even with the relatively period in a year, rather than the total amount of rainfall
low amount of annual rainfall in these years, suggesting (Figs. 4 and 5). Thus, it was essential for the local people
that the cropping systems in this area were adapted to to consider crop production in terms of high risk caused
fluctuation of rainfall distribution within an agricultural by seasonal variation of rainfall.
season in a year, to ensure successful production from at
least one crop, as insurance against the uneven rainfall Crop production in similar natural environment
distribution (Fig. 5). In Northeast Thailand, in which similar agro-
Although accurate statistical data and records for ecological conditions to those of the Myanmar Dry
crop productivity and rainfall were not available, upland Zone were observed (Table 10), more than 80% of the
crop production had been stable with satisfactory yields agricultural land was used for rainfed farming (Farming
several decades ago, according to group discussions with System Research Group, 1996), as in the Dry Zone. Like
elderly persons in the surveyed villages. They strongly in the Myanmar Dry Zone, farming was performed on
insisted that the rainfall at that time was more stable a small scale and crop yield was generally low due to
and evenly distributed. Therefore, the productivity of the low soil fertility and erratic rainfall in Northeast
sesame, pigeon pea and groundnut was significantly high Thailand (Idhipong, et al., 2012). However, the higher
and very reliable for their livelihood. The income from annual rainfall in Northeast Thailand may enable paddy
these crops covered household expenditure throughout rice cultivation on much larger scale than in the Dry
a year. Starting from the last three decades, however, Zone of Myanmar. Traditionally, the major agricultural
crop yields had gradually decreased due to uncertain system, rice-based cropping system, had been adopted
rainfall and insufficient soil moisture. in association with livestock rearing (Craig and Baker,
Natural resources are important and related to all 1986). Rice is produced for primary subsistence. The
the agroecosystem properties (Subhadhira et al., 1986). focus of rice cultivation is to produce it sufficiently for
Among them, soil and water resources determined home consumption and the stability of production is
the productivity of crops here in the Dry Zone. Major more important than the maximization of yields.
upland crops, pigeon pea and jujube could be exported Presently, crops are more diversified than in previ-
and were the main income source for all the households. ous years in Northeast Thailand. Vityakon et al. (2004)
Therefore, the farmer selection of cultivated crops in stated that the expansion of the market economy and
principle was compatible with the adaptability for crops increasing commercialization of agriculture arose from
to their agro-environment and natural resources, and socio-political and economic changes at the national and
also based on the market prices of the crops to some international levels and described the gradual changes
extent, according to the interviews of the farmers. As from subsistence farming to more commercialized
stated previously, one of the most critical climatic factors agriculture. About one-fifth of the cultivated area was de-

Table 10. Agroenvironmental data of the Dry Zone of Myanmar and Northeast Thailand.
Characteristics Dry Zone of Myanmar Northeast Thailand
Climatic conditions Semi-arid region Semi-arid region
Average temperature range From 15 ℃ to 32 ℃ From 19.6 ℃ to 30.2 ℃
Rainfall From 500 to 1,000 mm From 900 to 2,500 mm
rainy season (mid-May to October) rainy season (mid-April to mid-October)
cool season (mid-October to mid-February) dry season (mid-October to mid-April)
dry hot season (mid-February to mid-May)
Soil Mostly sandy soils (including gravel) Sandy texture
Cultivated crops and cropping Low land (rice-based cropping system) Low land (rice-based cropping system)
systems
Upland (pigeon pea-based cropping Upland (Cassava, Sugarcane)
system, sesame, groundnut, cotton,
pulses
Source: Food Security Assessment in the Dry Zone of Myanmar.
Natural Resource Management Issues in the Korat Basin of Northeast Thailand, An Overview.
178 Trop. Agr. Develop. 58(4)2014

voted to upland crops and in the recent decade, cassava ance of crops to various stresses, could not completely
and sugarcane have been the two dominant cash crops. compensate for the difficulties of producing profitable
Comparison of yields revealed that Northeast Thailand yields. Therefore, the current rainfed agriculture may
was competing very well with other regions of Thailand not provide economic growth and food security needed
for cassava and sugarcane production (Ekasingh et al., in the near future.
2007). Although the Dry Zone of Myanmar and North- To consider crop production in terms of high risk-
east Thailand shared nearly the same agroecological rainfed conditions and price fluctuations, one of the Dry
conditions, Thailand promoted industrialization and Zone products, Thanakha, Limonia acidissima (syn.
open market policy for upland crops. Therefore, farmers Hesperethusa crenulata), a tree plant, whose bark is used
in Northeast Thailand were able to adopt a diversified for a natural and traditional cosmetic, made by grinding
farming system under severe soil and climatic condi- the bark with a small amount of water on a circular
tions, although the cultivation of flowering herbaceous stone slab, could be suitable for cultivation. It makes
crops such as maize remained limited. skin smooth and cool, and is considered to remove
acne. Joo et al. (2004) indicated that UV-absorbent,
Cropping systems in the future Marmesin, extracted from the bark of Thanakha could
Although the present cropping systems seem to be commercially successful as a UV A-blocking product
be well adapted to the natural conditions, upland crop since Thanakha had long been used as a cosmetic in
productivity has gradually decreased due to uncertain Myanmar without causing toxicity. Wangthong et al.
rainfall and insufficient soil moisture, according to the (2010) also stated that the stem bark of Thanakha had
villagers. Even though we could not find conspicuous been commonly used especially by Myanmar women,
changes in the rainfall tendency, the local people said for more than a thousand years as a skin care product.
that there was a distinct rainfall instability, compared to The trees that grow in the upland area of the Dry Zone
30 years ago and as a result, crop productivity was also are more fragrant than those produced in other areas. It
more unstable. As we stated previously, since pigeon is considered that if they were produced in fertile soil,
pea and jujube were crops that could be exported, ex- their quality would be low with a thin bark and large
port market and policy played an important role in the trunk. The demand is very high in this region because
economy of the farm households. Based on these two Thanakha with good quality can be produced only in
factors, the villagers were considering for the future. some specific areas of the Dry Zone.
When we examined the possibility of planting other
field crops such as maize, many factors were associated
Conclusion
with low yields in Myanmar (Oo and Ekasingh, 2010).
The minimum use of improved production technologies The present study on agroecosystems of the Dry
was one of the major factors responsible for low yields. Zone based on various data and interviews of the local
The farmers pointed out that maize needed more nutri- people about farming practices revealed that they were
ents, displayed a low drought tolerance and absorbed well adapted to their agro-environmental conditions,
a large amount of nutrients from the soil. Continuous since the major land type consisted of upland crop fields,
cultivation of maize might have caused a decline of which accounted for 92% of the cultivated area. A vast
yield, compounded with the decline of soil fertility and rainfed upland area led to nearly total dependence on
decreased water-holding capacity of soil according to field crops such as sesame, pigeon pea and, groundnut
group interviews conducted in 2011 and 2012. For the and a fruit tree (jujube). A pigeon pea-based cropping
introduction to the Dry Zone of Myanmar of sugarcane system, i.e. sesame-pigeon pea intercropping has
and cassava, that are more tolerant crops to environ- been sustainable in these areas since long time ago.
mental stresses and have already been cultivated widely Mechanization and chemical fertilizer application for
in Northeast Thailand, social investment, such as the the improvement of crop productivity were very limited.
construction of processing factories, would be neces- Edible oil crops, such as groundnut and sesame were
sary. According to our observations, under the high-risk produced mainly for home consumption. Pigeon pea, one
rainfed conditions and soils with a low water-holding of the important commercial crops was drought-tolerant
capacity and fertility, the farmers tended to limit invest- and fertilizer requirements were minimal, compared
ment for crop production. The use of chemical fertilizers, to those of other field crops. Jujube required the least
which were considered to be useful to enhance the toler- inputs but provided high income if the export market
Yee and Nawata: Land use and farming systems in Dry Zone, Myanmar 179

was favorable. Therefore, the existing cropping systems University (Thailand) p. 15.
Farming System Research Group. 1996. Sustainable land use sys-
had been adopted long time ago, and enabled to secure
tems in Northeast Thailand. Research and Financial Report.
home consumption with adaptability to the environment, Khon Kaen University (Thailand) p.2.
in addition to providing income to buy staple foods. In Glissman, S. R., R. E. Gracia, and M. A. Amador 1981. The ecologi-
cal basis for the application of traditional agricultural technol-
this sense, people in the survey area in the Dry Zone
ogy in the management of tropical agroecosystems. Agro-eco-
were well adapted to their agro-environment even under systems. 7: 173-185.
severe conditions. This conclusion was in agreement Hadden, R. L. 2008. The Geology of Burma (Myanmar): An anno-
tated bibliography of Burma’s geology, geography and earth
with the study of Matsuda (2013), who investigated the
science. Topographic Engineering Center, US Army Corps of
changes in crop productivity in a village in the Sagaing Engineers. Virginia Geospatial Library (Alexandria) p. 19.
Region. Idhipong, S., A. Pong-sed, T. Maolanont, S. P. Wani, T. J. Rego,
and P. Pathak 2012. Improved crops and cropping systems for
According to Matsuda (2013), maximization of
rainfed Northeast Thailand. In Community watershed man-
productivity, which tends to reduce stability, would not agement for sustainable intensification in Northeast Thailand.
be appropriate in his surveyed areas. However, the local International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Trop-
ics (India) pp. 92-131.
people were worrying about the future for crop produc-
Joo, S. H., S. C. Lee, and S. K. Kim 2004. UV absorbent, Marmesin,
tion. Even though the present system, sesame-pigeon from the bark of Thanakha, Hesperethusa crenulata L. J. Plant
cropping was adapted to the local environment to some Biology, 47(2): 163-165.
Kyi, K. M. 2012. Farmer vulnerability amidst climate variability:
extent, they were still uneasy about the instability of
A case study of Dry Zone of Myanmar International Confer-
rainfall and crop market. Therefore, the introduction of ence on International Relations and Development (ICIRD).
new crops, and changes to new systems in this region Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Develop-
ment, Chaing Mai University (Thailand) p.3
are likely to take place in the near future.
LUD (Land Use Division) 2002. Annual report of Department of
Agriculture. Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, the Union
of Myanmar.
Acknowledgements Matsuda, M. 2013. Upland farming systems coping with uncertain
rainfall in the central Dry Zone of Myanmar: How stable is in-
This study and main surveys were supported by the digenous multiple cropping under semi-arid conditions? Hum.
Faculty Foundation from Paris. The supplemental sur- Ecol. 41: 927-936.
Oo, W. T. and B. Ekasingh 2010. Factors affecting the adoption
veys were financially supported by the JSPS KAKENHI
of chemical fertilizers in maize cropping system in Southern
Grant Number 23248055. We would like to express our Shan State, Myanmar. Proceedings of International Confer-
gratitude to both institutions. Special thanks are given ence on Food and Agricultural Supply Chain in Indo-China
region: Phitsanulok (Thailand) March. 29-31, 2010. pp. 63-73.
to the Chairman of the Village Peace and Development
Poe, C. A. 2011. Food security assessment in the Dry Zone, Myan-
Council and staff, the managers of the Departments mar. [Online] http://home.wfp.org/ stellent/groups/public/
of Cotton, Agriculture and Settlement & Land Record, documents/ena/wfp234780.pdf (browsed on Jan. 22, 2012).
Sen Roy, N. and S. Kaur 2000. Climatology of monsoon rains of
and to all of the interviewed farmers and villagers in the
Myanmar (Burma). Inter. J. Climatol. 20: 913-928.
surveyed villages for their information, hospitality and SLRD (Settlement and Land Record Department) 2011. Myanmar
active participation. Agriculture at A Glance. Department of Agricultural Planning,
Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, Government of the
Union of Myanmar p.19.
Subhadhira, S., S. Simaraks, M. Samart, and V. Limpinuntana
References
1987. Changes in systems properties of Ban Hin Lad: A village
ADB (Asian Development Bank) 2009. Building climate resilience agroecosystem in Northeastern Thailand. In Proceedings of
in the agriculture sector in Asia and the Pacific. Asian Devel- Agroecosystem Research for Rural Development. Chiang Mai
opment Bank and International Food Policy Research Insti- University (Thailand) pp. 79-101.
tute (Philippines) pp. 64-65. VGA (Village General Administration) 2012. Annual reports. Kani
Craig, I. A. and G. P. Baker 1986. The upper paddies in North- Township p.22.
east Thailand: the current situation and some implication Vityakon, P., S. Subhadhira, V. Limpinuntana, S. Srila, V. Trelo-ges,
for development. NERADICS Problem Definition Series No. and V. Sriboonlue 2004. From forest to farmfields: Changes in
P3. Northeast Rainfed Agricultural Development (NERAD) land use in undulating terrain of Northeast Thailand at differ-
Project, Northeast Regional Office of Agriculture, Khon Kaen ent scales during the past century. Southeast Asian Studies.
(Thailand) pp. 157-187. 41: 444-472.
Ekasingh, B., C. Sungkapitux, J. Kitchaicharoen, and P. Suebpong- Wangthong, S., T. Palaga, S. Rengpipat, S. P. Wanichwecharungru-
sang 2007. The development of competitive commercial agri- ang, P. Chanchaisak, M. Heinrich 2010. Biological activities
culture in the Northeast of Thailand, 1950-2006: A review. The and safety of Thanaka (Hesperethusa crenulata) stem bark. J.
Multiple Cropping Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai Ethnopharmacol. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2010.08.046 (in press).