You are on page 1of 2

Whether there must be two different victims’ legal teams under separate Victims’ Legal

Representatives in this case because one portion of the victims supported secession and the other
favored remaining part of Astafur.

The legal team must be unbiased on their decision-making on how to represent the victims
accurately. Representing a team in court with two different point of view and beliefs, would
confuse the court and would not disclose a right representation of the victims. It must be clear to
the court on what is the real representation or stand of each legal team of the victims. In this
case, the victims have two stands which are those who supports secession and those who are in
favored to remain as part of the Astafur.

asfafasfasfgsdgmalvlvin whose territory they habitually reside. Also it was declared in the said
agreement that Pantos will continue under the government of the Astafur.

Hence, with the arguments that were laid out it was clearly presented that there was indeed a
need for the two different victims’ legal teams under separate Victims’ Legal Representatives in
this case because one portion of the victims supported secession and the other favored remaining
part of Astafur. One legal team working with two different ideal would result to conflicts and
misunderstandings.

Whether there must be two different victims’ legal teams under separate Victims’ Legal
Representatives in this case because one portion of the victims supported secession and the other
favored remaining part of Astafur.

The legal team must be unbiased on their decision-making on how to represent the victims
accurately. Representing a team in court with two different point of view and beliefs, would
confuse the court and would not disclose a right representation of the victims. It must be clear to
the court on what is the real representation or stand of each legal team of the victims. In this
case, the victims have two stands which are those who supports secession and those who are in
favored to remain as part of the Astafur.

asfafasfasfgsdgmalvlvin whose territory they habitually reside. Also it was declared in the said
agreement that Pantos will continue under the government of the Astafur.

Hence, with the arguments that were laid out it was clearly presented that there was indeed a
need for the two different victims’ legal teams under separate Victims’ Legal Representatives in
this case because one portion of the victims supported secession and the other favored remaining
part of Astafur. One legal team working with two different ideal would result to conflicts and
misunderstandings.

Whether there must be two different victims’ legal teams under separate Victims’ Legal
Representatives in this case because one portion of the victims supported secession and the other
favored remaining part of Astafur.
The legal team must be unbiased on their decision-making on how to represent the victims
accurately. Representing a team in court with two different point of view and beliefs, would
confuse the court and would not disclose a right representation of the victims. It must be clear to
the court on what is the real representation or stand of each legal team of the victims. In this
case, the victims have two stands which are those who supports secession and those who are in
favored to remain as part of the Astafur.

asfafasfasfgsdgmalvlvin whose territory they habitually reside. Also it was declared in the said
agreement that Pantos will continue under the government of the Astafur.

Hence, with the arguments that were laid out it was clearly presented that there was indeed a
need for the two different victims’ legal teams under separate Victims’ Legal Representatives in
this case because one portion of the victims supported secession and the other favored remaining
part of Astafur. One legal team working with two different ideal would result to conflicts and
misunderstandings.

Whether there must be two different victims’ legal teams under separate Victims’ Legal
Representatives in this case because one portion of the victims supported secession and the other
favored remaining part of Astafur.

The legal team must be unbiased on their decision-making on how to represent the victims
accurately. Representing a team in court with two different point of view and beliefs, would
confuse the court and would not disclose a right representation of the victims. It must be clear to
the court on what is the real representation or stand of each legal team of the victims. In this
case, the victims have two stands which are those who supports secession and those who are in
favored to remain as part of the Astafur.

asfafasfasfgsdgmalvlvin whose territory they habitually reside. Also it was declared in the said
agreement that Pantos will continue under the government of the Astafur.

Hence, with the arguments that were laid out it was clearly presented that there was indeed a
need for the two different victims’ legal teams under separate Victims’ Legal Representatives in
this case because one portion of the victims supported secession and the other favored remaining
part of Astafur. One legal team working with two different ideal would result to conflicts and
misunderstandings.