Cavite State University

College of Arts and Sciences

Department of Social Sciences and Humanities

Evaluation of Research Report Defense/Presentation

Title of Research Proposal : ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Name of Researcher/s : ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Section : _________________________________

Element/Component Exemplary (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1) Rating
Is relevant and novel, clearly Is relevant and describes the Is relevant and describes the Is inappropriate given the
stated, and describes the context context and the variables and context but fails to express problem and the purpose of
TITLE and the variables and their their relationship the variables and their the study
relationship relationship

Presents an ample description of
what are included in the
research report. Incorporates and
INTRODUCTION gives details of all the items in
CHAPTER the chapter. Integrates all the
suggestions for improvement in
the chapter.
Gives too much information of
what is in the research report.
Includes and explains all the
items in the chapter. Incorporates
most of the suggestions for
improvement in the chapter.
Gives little information of
what the research report is all
about. Includes and describes
some items in the chapter.
Adds-in some of the
suggestions for improvement
in the chapter.
Does not give any
information about what to
expect in the research report.
Misses to explain the
important items in the
chapter. Includes very few of
the suggestions for
improvement in the chapter

Exceptionally thorough,
appropriate, clear, and
REVIEW OF systematic review. Literature is
RELATED highly relevant to the problem
LITERATURE or question Integrates all the
CHAPTER suggestions for improvement in
the chapter.
Generally thorough, appropriate,
and clear review. Literature bears
upon the problem or question.
Incorporates most of the
suggestions for improvement in
the chapter.
Review barely meets standard
for a research paper and/or is
marginally related to the
problem or question.
Adds-in some of the
suggestions for improvement
in the chapter.
Scanty, inappropriate, and/or
unclear review. Literature is
not relevant to the problem or
question. Includes very few
of the suggestions for
improvement in the chapter

METHODOLOGY Presents a detailed, clear
CHAPTER description of how the study
was conducted and analyzed.
Incorporates and gives details of
all the items in the chapter.
Integrates all the suggestions for
improvement in the chapter
Describes clearly how the study
was conducted. Includes and
explains all the items in the
chapter. Incorporates most of the
suggestions for improvement in
the chapter.
Explains how the study was
conducted but some items are
confusing and lack detail.
Include some of the
suggestions for improvement
in the chapter.
Give information about how
the study was conducted but
very confusing. Not
sequential, most steps are
missing. Includes very few of
the suggestions for
improvement in the chapter

1
 Includes a complete and correct
REFERENCES/ bibliography or source list.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
There are few or no errors in
mechanics, usage, grammar, or
GRAMMAR, USAGE, spelling. Word choice is precise
MECHANICS & and appropriate for the reader.
SPELLING
Students present information in
ORAL logical, interesting sequence
PRESENTATION which panel can follow;
demonstrate full knowledge
(4X) (more than required) by
answering all the questions with
explanations and elaboration;
Graphics explain and reinforce
screen text and presentation.
TOTAL
Overall Evaluation: ________ Passed (24 – 40)
__________________________________________________
Name and Signature of Panel Member
Some bibliography or source lists
are missing and/or incorrect.
There are minor errors in
mechanics, usage, grammar, or
spelling. Word choice is usually
appropriate for the reader.
Students present information in
logical sequence which panel can
follow; are at ease with expected
answers to all questions, but fails
to elaborate. Graphics are related
to text and presentation.
______________________________
Date
2
Includes an incomplete and/
or incorrect bibliography or
source list
There are numerous errors in
mechanics, usage, grammar, or
spelling. Word choice is not
always appropriate for the
reader.
Panel has difficulty following
presentation because students
jump around. Students are
uncomfortable with
information and are able to
answer only rudimentary
questions; occasionally use
graphics that rarely support
text and presentation.
__________ Failed (23 & Below)
Include very few or may not
include a bibliography or
source list, or almost all are
incorrect.
Numerous errors in
mechanics, usage, grammar,
or spelling may hinder
comprehension. Word choice
shows little understanding
of the reader.
Panel cannot understand
presentation because there is
no sequence of information.
Students do not have
grasp of information; cannot
answer questions about
subject; use superfluous
graphics or no graphics
 Comments and Suggestions

_____________________________________ _____________
Panel Member Date