Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2018-01-24
While activities concerning the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) came under
much scrutiny in recent times, its sister fund the Employees’ Trust Fund (ETF)
has seldom been discussed. Even when discussed, many have pointed to a
looming merger of the two social security programmes, followed by fears of the
funds being open to abuse and
“As this is a voluntary scheme, those who are self-employed can pay Rs. 500 per
month and they will be entitled to all the benefit schemes offered by ETFB. This is
also valid for foreign employment and benefits can be obtained if a migrant
worker pays a fee of $10 or Rs. 1,000. This is the special feature of the ETF,
whereas this facility is not provided by the EPF. At the moment we have about
40,000 self employed people contributing to the fund,” Madihahewa said,
speaking on the special scheme provided for self employed persons.
Out of the 10 benefit schemes of the ETFB, six fall under the criteria of health
ETFB has 18 regional offices across the island
Asked of the awareness initiatives undertaken by the ETFB, Madihahewa said the
board has launched mobile service through which employees can seek services.
“Last year we implemented the ‘Janapathi Jangama Sewa’ to expand the reach of
our services. ETFB has 18 regional offices across the island and one of our key
focus areas is the plantation sector, as many workers there do not have an
identification number.” He said the ETFB together with the Central Bank, Labour
Department and the Department for Registration of Persons, have launched a
joint project where such workers receive an identification number.
“We are in the process of introducing something called the ‘Unit Number’. The
Unit Number is the identification number given for members of both the EPF and
ETF. Following the appointment of a committee by the Prime Minister, to
introduce an EPF and ETF tracking system, we have signed a MoU with the
Department for Registration of Persons, the Department of Labour as well as the
Central Bank. The unit number will therefore facilitate this initiative. Until now,
employers had to provide the members with the identification number. We are in
the process of converting this system into an employee centric system, where the
unit number will replace the identification number,” Madihahewa explained.
Madihahewa took office three years ago and has since overseen many projects,
including the restructuring project of the board. The ETF Inspection System
Application (EISA) is one such project undertaken by Madihahewa. ETF’s
Enforcement Officers have been provided with tabs that possess details of
members and employees, in an effort to digitise the field work of the board. The
project is carried out with technical assistance of the International Labour
Organisation (ILO) together with the Finance Ministry. “All our officers have been
trained by the ILO technical officers. A training programme is currently underway
for our employees to aid our digitisation efforts. There is also an ICTA project
involving Rs. 120 million in funds. Our software is more than 15 years old. Under
the restructuring process we are now re-engineering the entire computer
system,” Madihahewa said.
The ETFB Chairman is also seeking to improve its human resource management
programme under which he aims to make several changes to the board. “Earlier
contributors had to wait for long periods of time -- ranging from 3 to 6 months--
to get their monies. But now we have an express service, where an employee,
upon requests made during the morning, can obtain his or her money by 2.00 pm.
Other services have been expedited to serve members within three to seven days.
Our services were decentralised recently. In addition to the ETFB office in Nuwara
Eliya, we established one in Vavuniya last year, along with an office in Jaffna,
while we are also extending our services to Trincomalee as well.” he said.
Adequate Assistance
Anton Marcus, Joint Secretary, Free Trade Zones & General Services Employees’
Union
The also spoke to the Joint Secretary of the Free Trade Zones and General
Services Employees Union Anton Marcus to obtain his views on employee
awareness on the ETF process and benefits. Speaking on awareness of the ETF
among workers, Marcus said in terms of contributions there is no great difference
between the EPF and the ETF. “Every employer which contributes to the EPF also
contributes to ETF. For us however, the EPF is something we can redeem as a long
term reward, when we are looking at retirement. In contrast we are able to claim
short term benefits from the ETF. Our members are of the belief that they are
able to claim these benefits when required,” he said.
“Sometimes if a company has not suspended its operations, but are pivoting
operations or changing its name, employees are given a new letter of
appointment. In such instances the ETF has notified us that this action is recorded
as a termination of employment. The board has also arrived at a decision that
employees can’t claim benefits if there is such a termination of employment.
When one of our members faced such a situation last year, we had to go through
great difficulty and claimed benefits through the intervention of the Chairman. As
far as I know, almost 50 employees of two factories faced this problem. There
may be more people who had to face similar circumstances,” he added.
“Some officials have admitted that new schemes have been introduced by the
ETFB ignoring the fundamental philosophy behind each scheme,” he said.
Explaining further Wijesinha said the EPF was created as a superannuation
scheme, an organizational pension program created for the benefit of employees.
“The ETF on the other hand is widely accepted as the idea of late Lalith
Athulathdmudali who wanted to create a fund which could be partly used to
finance industrial and commercial ventures and thereby benefit the working
population by creating more employment. At that time worker participation in
management was a popular concept and therefore the concept included
economic democracy and worker participation in management through equity
investment as objectives,” Wijesinha noted.
Purpose defeated
As per the broad outline of the ETF scheme announced during the establishment
of the ETF in 1980, the purpose of the Act was to ensure a gratuity to all
employees and to enable the investment of monies in the fund for purposes
beneficial to the employees. This was in contrast to the case of EPF from which
there is state borrowing. However Wijesinha notes that these fundamentals have
been ignored by authorities in the recent past.
“Why would the Government create two funds for the same purpose if the
purpose was to endorse state borrowing?” he questioned. “This is the reason
why, when attempts were made to amalgamate the EPF and ETF funds, I pointed
out the error in deliberating this course of action without understanding the
fundamental purposes of the two funds. I have notified the Premier in this regard
in writing, to which I have not received a response. We need elaborate public
understanding and discussion on this matter, so that the positive objectives of
setting up these funds would not be lost,” Wijesinha stressed. Responding to a
query on the security of the funds, Wijesinha noted that there exists an
unfounded fear among many uninformed members that their savings are not
actually available. The reason for this fear has been attributed to assumptions
that the Government has appropriated them. “Even educated private sector
managers have expressed this fear. More communication is required to educate
employees that their funds are safe. With over 95 per cent investments in
Government securities there should be no doubt that the funds are safe,” he said,
stressing however that this was not the desired objective of the establishment of
the fund.
Speaking on the objects of the ETFB and the clause on promotion of employee
participation in management through the acquisition of equity interest in
enterprises, Wijesinha said it is his belief that this dangerous object should be
removed.
“There were clear instances when the ETF acquired significant stakes in
companies which were being privatised, thus completely defeating the objective
of privatisation. In one instance the ETF acquired 90% of the equity of a company
being privatised. By and large the objects for which the ETF was formed has been
achieved, but it was only in the early 1990s that a clear identification of what ETF
stands for, and the difference between EPF and ETF, was made. This enabled
many who argued that the ETF was a mere duplication of EPF to realise the
difference,” Wijesinha opined.
The former ETFB Chairman underscored that it is imperative the authorities re-
visit this and re-define the objectives in line with current requirements, without
deviating from the objects specified in the ETF Act. “The Board should not be
callous in its equity investment policy. Every investment however small must be
transparent and justified. The investment in shares is grossly insufficient and
defeats the purpose for which this fund was set up,” Wijesinha underscored. He
added a separate study is required to determine whether the EPF and ETF have
provided a fair return at least equivalent to the savings interest rate of the
National Savings Bank.
“I hope the policy makers would not lose sight of the useful objects of ETF and
would formulate two funds to be managed by one body and continue the
programmes that would benefit employees during their working life and continue
to promote those techniques which would provide a safer workplace and create
healthier workers,” he reiterated.
Posted by Thavam